惠普Omen 16 2023笔记本电脑回顾:145 WGeForce RTX 4080性能
2023年的Omen 16继承了 去年的模型采用更快的第13代猛禽湖-H处理器,Nvidia Ada Lovelace RTX GPU,以及翻新的机箱设计。它可以被认为是比更注重预算的 惠普Pavilion Gaming 16.
我们的审查单位是最高端的配置,配备了第13代猛禽湖酷睿i7-13700HX处理器,145瓦GeForce RTX 4080 GPU,1440p240 IPS显示屏,每键RGB照明,以及32GB内存,价格略低于2600美元。配备RTX 4060、1080p165 IPS显示屏和单区键盘照明的较小的SKU也可在1100美元起价。不过,目前所有选项都必须配备相同的酷睿i7-13700HX处理器。请注意,惠普今年已经放弃了AMD和Radeon的选项。
Omen 16的替代品包括其他高端16英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 Alienware x16 R1,联想Legion Pro 7 16,华硕ROG Strix G16, 或 Razer Blade 16.
更多惠普评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.6 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M | 2.4 kg | 22.6 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 18.57 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 30.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
91.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱 - 加长的后部,以便更好地冷却
今年的主要视觉更新涉及延伸的尾部和更大的通风格栅,以更好地适应更高的TGP目标和更快的性能。因此,该模型从前面看与它的前辈相似,而从后面看变化则更明显。金属材料和光滑的表面在其他方面感觉和看起来与这两种设计相同。
底座的刚性非常好,尽管没有像雷蛇Blade 16那样坚固或不屈。例如,试图扭转底座和盖子,相比之下,会导致惠普的翘曲度略大。至少我们可以注意到我们的设备上没有吱吱作响或视觉缺陷。
由于上面提到的延长后部,新的Omen 16实际上比2022年的设计长约11毫米。即便如此,整体重量仍然大致相同,系统的尺寸仍然小于ROG Strix G16, Legion Pro 7 16,或Alienware x16 R1。
连接性
端口选项比去年的型号有所减少,因为现在少了一个USB-A端口,也没有了SD读卡器。两个USB-C端口已从后部边缘移至左侧边缘,以便于使用。
沟通
英特尔AX211是可选的,用于Wi-Fi6E和蓝牙5.3连接。我们在与华硕AXE11000 6GHz网络配对时没有遇到任何问题。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Alienware x16 R1 |
网络摄像头 - 2MP升级
一个200万像素的网络摄像头与一个隐私快门一起成为标准配置,以取代2022年Omen 16上的100万像素网络摄像头。然而,该系列不支持红外线。
维护
底部面板由六个十字螺丝固定,便于拆卸。用户可以直接访问2个M.2 PCIe4 x4 2280 SSD插槽、2个SODIMM插槽、电池和可拆卸的WLAN模块,就像2022年的设计一样。
配件和保修
如果配置了RTX 4080,零售盒中包括一个HyperX Cloud II Core无线耳机。否则,零售盒中只包括通常的交流适配器和文书工作。
如果从美国购买,标准的一年有限制造商保修。
输入设备 - 更小但更好的触摸板
键盘
虽然机箱和点击板得到了大修,但键盘并没有改变,因此打字体验与2022年的Omen 16相同。键的反馈令人满意,特别是点击式的空格键,但回车键可以更牢固。在这里打字的感觉比在刀锋16上更宽敞。
触摸板
有趣的是,惠普已经将点击板的尺寸从13 x 8.6厘米减少到了2022年的Omen 16上。 2022年的Omen 16到我们较新的2023型号上的12.5 x 8厘米。然而,当按下它的表面时,反馈已经得到改善,有了更令人满意和可听的点击。因此,我们对较小的尺寸并不感到困扰。
显示 - 没有坏的选择
惠普提供了两种显示器选项,如下表所示。我们的测量结果只反映了黑体字的面板。
- 1920 x 1080,165赫兹,IPS,7毫秒响应时间,哑光,300尼特
- 2560 x 1440,240赫兹,IPS,3毫秒响应时间,哑光,300尼特
对于游戏来说,这两块面板都不能算是一个糟糕的选择,但是像《守望先锋2》或《勇者无敌》 等快节奏游戏的玩家可能要考虑1440p的选择,因为它的响应时间和刷新率更快。色彩覆盖率仅限于100% sRGB,而像Legion Pro 7或ROG Strix G16这样的竞争对手可能有更全面的DCI-P3面板。
请注意,Omen 16是其尺寸类别中剩下的少数几个16:9游戏笔记本电脑之一,因为其他大多数已经转向16:10。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 310.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 888:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.52
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
HP Omen 16-wf000 BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1" | HP Omen 16-n0033dx BOE0AAE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Alienware x16 R1 BOE NE16NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | 23% | 1% | 20% | 23% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69 | 74.4 8% | 99.2 44% | 69.5 1% | 97 41% | 98.5 43% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.2 | 99.2 0% | 100 1% | 99.8 1% | 99.9 1% | 100 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.2 | 73.4 3% | 88.6 24% | 71.6 1% | 84.9 19% | 89.7 26% |
Response Times | -149% | -9% | -42% | 11% | -34% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 4.6 ? | 17.6 ? -283% | 5.1 ? -11% | 10.9 ? -137% | 5.1 ? -11% | 6.6 ? -43% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.7 ? | 11.2 ? -15% | 10.3 ? -6% | 4.6 ? 53% | 6.6 ? 32% | 12 ? -24% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -38% | -6% | 3% | 5% | -4% | |
Brightness middle | 310.9 | 373.3 20% | 302.2 -3% | 491 58% | 470 51% | 456.8 47% |
Brightness | 296 | 361 22% | 285 -4% | 472 59% | 459 55% | 437 48% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 79 -13% | 89 -2% | 91 0% | 93 2% | 83 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.44 -26% | 0.26 26% | 0.4 -14% | 0.42 -20% | 0.35 -0% |
Contrast | 888 | 848 -5% | 1162 31% | 1228 38% | 1119 26% | 1305 47% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.18 | 2.12 3% | 1.63 25% | 1.6 27% | 1.86 15% | 3.7 -70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.58 | 5.62 -57% | 4.13 -15% | 5.15 -44% | 3.87 -8% | 6.42 -79% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.52 | 2.06 -296% | 1.17 -125% | 0.97 -87% | 0.93 -79% | 0.66 -27% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 2.5 11% | 2.5 11% | 3 -7% | 2.7 4% | 2.6 7% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.3 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.211 100% | 2.246 98% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6002 108% | 6408 101% | 6590 99% | 6979 93% | 6711 97% | 6108 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -61% /
-45% | 3% /
-0% | -13% /
-4% | 12% /
9% | -5% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏开箱即被校准,平均灰度和色彩deltaE值分别为2.8和2.18。用X-Rite色度计自行校准面板将进一步提高平均值,分别为0.5和0.52。如果需要,业主可以应用我们上面的校准过的ICM配置文件。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.6 ms rise | |
↘ 5.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.1 ms rise | |
↘ 2.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
只有在阴凉处,户外能见度才可以接受。显示屏的亮度不如Legion Pro 7的显示屏、ROG Strix G16, 或刀锋16在户外更容易看到。
性能 - 第13代英特尔猛禽湖-H
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们通过Nvidia控制面板将我们的设备设置为dGPU模式,并通过Omen Gaming Hub和Windows设置为性能模式。除了常规的性能模式外,还有一个最大风扇设置。我们建议用户熟悉Omen Gaming Hub,因为它是调整电源配置文件、RGB照明、游戏设置等的控制中心。令人讨厌的是,惠普的电源配置文件设置没有与常规的Windows电源配置文件同步。
支持高级Optimus或MUX和G-Sync。
处理器
CPU的性能是我们所期望的,相对于其他具有相同性能的笔记本电脑而言。 酷睿i7-13700HXCPU,这意味着Omen 16上没有重大的性能节流。值得注意的是,该处理器与更昂贵的酷睿i9-13900HK同时比即将推出的第12代酷睿i7-12700H的速度快15-20%。 酷睿i7-12700H.而酷睿i9-13900HX在性能上有更大的提升,但这个型号没有这样的选项。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (15397 - 21999, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (77807 - 109364, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (3412 - 5053, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (105112 - 114717, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (10407 - 13519, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (38311 - 53484, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (72510 - 182575, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (981 - 1451, n=10) | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (8145 - 11837, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (20471 - 42415, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
系统性能
PCMark结果领先于去年的Omen 16,特别是在GPU重的数字内容创作分测试中,因为我们有更快的RTX 4080。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
PCMark 10 Score | 7814 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (36504 - 63990, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (36510 - 69729, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (33598 - 85675, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (81.9 - 97.9, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon揭示了在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题,类似于 ROG Strix G16或刀片16。4K60视频播放在其他方面几乎完美,在我们长达1分钟的视频测试中只有一个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了一个2TBSK hynix PC801NVMe固态硬盘的连续读写速率分别高达7100MB/s和6000MB/s,可以与流行的三星PM9A1相媲美。然而,较小的4k q32块大小的读写速率异常缓慢,即使经过多次重测。然而,整体性能在受压时还是很稳定,表明散热效果很好。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 16-n0033dx |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 145 WGeForce RTX 4080
图形性能非常好,可与其他游戏笔记本相媲美。 相同的GeForce RTX 4080GPU在5%的范围内。降级到 RTX 4070或 RTX 4060从我们的RTX 4080降到RTX 4070或RTX 4060,预计将分别降低约20%和30%的图形性能。
如果禁用最大风扇模式,整体性能会受到一点影响,如下表所示。如果设置为平衡模式,GPU性能会下降近15%,而对CPU性能的影响则要小得多。
电源配置文件设置 | Fire Strike 物理得分 | Fire Strike GPU得分 | Fire Strike 综合得分 |
性能+最大风扇开启 | 32721 | 38663 | 14122 |
性能+最大风扇关闭 | 31314 (-4%) | 38142 (-1%) | 13655 (-3%) |
平衡性 | 31837 (-3%) | 33328 (-14%) | 12426 (-12%) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 40848 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 32191 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 16835 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
所有的游戏都可以在原生的1440p分辨率下玩,即使在《Returnal》这样的高要求游戏中,平均帧率也在60FPS以上。移动RTX 4080与1440p面板搭配得非常好。
如果启用RT或在外部4K显示器上游戏,建议使用DLSS,因为移动RTX 4080比台式RTX 4080弱得多。 桌面RTX 4080要弱得多。.例如,在4K环境下运行《赛博朋克2077》时,平均帧率将从禁用DLSS 2的35 FPS跃升至启用DLSS 2的55 FPS。
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (221 - 353, n=6) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (199.6 - 297, n=6) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (166.7 - 213, n=6) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (112.9 - 167.1, n=9) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
2560x1440 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (85 - 114.8, n=9) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
3840x2160 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (46.4 - 60.9, n=9) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 |
Returnal | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (116 - 150, n=4) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (117 - 148, n=4) | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (114 - 137, n=4) | |
1920x1080 Epic Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (107 - 121, n=4) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
2560x1440 Epic Preset | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (79 - 92, n=4) | |
3840x2160 Epic Preset | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (43 - 53, n=3) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 184.7 | 176.8 | 171.6 | 114 | 108.6 | 142.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 453.2 | 407 | 296.5 | 163.4 | 113.1 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 187.4 | 173 | 164.2 | 153.7 | 145.7 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 208 | 194.9 | 153.9 | 120.6 | 71.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 172.4 | 151.2 | 118.5 | 102.3 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 413 | 334 | 320 | 299 | 225 | 116.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 132.3 | 127.1 | 124.4 | 116.7 | 77.6 | 35.3 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 260.2 | 232.5 | 177.1 | 145.2 | 102.6 | 54.4 |
F1 22 (2022) | 261 | 260 | 245 | 100.7 | 70.7 | 35.5 |
Returnal (2023) | 148 | 148 | 136 | 107 | 91 | 53 |
排放
系统噪音 - 在性能模式下仍然非常响亮
无论设置或屏幕负载如何,风扇总是以近30 dB(A)的速度活动,而背景却只有23 dB(A)的静音。从另一个角度看,风扇不需要经常脉冲,因此在运行视频流等要求不高的负载时,风扇噪音通常在30至33 dB(A)的低水平和相对不显眼的范围。
在平衡模式而不是性能模式下进行游戏时,风扇明显更安静,只有44.2 dB(A),这可能值得在图形性能上减少15%。否则,Omen 16是市场上最吵的游戏笔记本之一,当设置为性能模式时,噪音超过57 dB(A)。
电源配置文件设置 | Witcher 3 风扇噪音 dB(A) |
平衡模式 | 44.2 |
性能+最大风扇关闭 | 57 |
性能 + 风扇开启 | 58.3 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29.6 / 29.8 / 30.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.8 / 58.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Alienware x16 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HK, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 8% | -8% | -1% | 10% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 24.2 -5% | 22.7 1% | 25 -9% | 25 -9% | 23 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.6 | 27.4 7% | 23.1 22% | 28 5% | 26 12% | 23 22% |
Idle Average * | 29.8 | 27.4 8% | 25.8 13% | 30 -1% | 28 6% | 23 23% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.4 | 28.9 5% | 25.8 15% | 38 -25% | 30 1% | 23.6 22% |
Load Average * | 33.8 | 32.3 4% | 39.3 -16% | 48 -42% | 48 -42% | 39 -15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 57 | 54.1 5% | 49.9 12% | 53 7% | 49 14% | 51.6 9% |
Load Maximum * | 58.3 | 57.6 1% | 54.8 6% | 55 6% | 52 11% | 51.3 12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度是对称的,热点离键盘中心最近。这个区域在游戏时可以达到40至45摄氏度,而在更厚、更重、更快的键盘上则是55至60摄氏度。 联想Legion Pro 7 16.表面温度普遍较低,这可能是由于惠普设计的通风栅栏较大,TGP目标较低。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.4 °C / 88.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M | Alienware x16 R1 Intel Core i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | -13% | -17% | -12% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45 | 41.2 8% | 47.2 -5% | 53 -18% | 54 -20% | 40 11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48.8 | 53.2 -9% | 47.8 2% | 59 -21% | 55 -13% | 37.6 23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.2 | 26.4 10% | 36.8 -26% | 34 -16% | 29 1% | 32.4 -11% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.8 | 27.8 3% | 35.8 -24% | 32 -11% | 33 -15% | 31.4 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动Prime95压力时,CPU时钟速率和电路板功耗将分别飙升至3.4 GHz和110 W,持续约两分钟或直到核心温度达到91 C。此后,CPU将平均约3.0 GHz和90 W,以保持80至90 C之间的冷却温度范围。 刀锋16.
当运行 Witcher 3时,GPU时钟速率和主板功耗将略高于关闭最大风扇的性能模式,正如我们下面的截图所示。这些结果与我们上面的Fire Strike ,核心温度在最大风扇开启时也会明显降低。因此,如果你想从笔记本电脑中尽可能多地榨取性能,你必须启用Man Fan模式。
运行 Witcher 3当然,风扇噪音更小,但是以图形性能为代价。
使用电池电源运行会严重限制性能。在电池上进行3DMark 11测试,物理和图形得分分别为8347和10654分,而在主电源上则为23751和56145分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 41 | 33 |
Prime95压力 | 2.4 - 3.2 | - | 81 - 88 | 49 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.3 - 1.8 | 1300 - 2250 | 89 | 87 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | ~0.8 | 1665 | 68 | 74 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式+最大风扇关闭) | ~1.2 | 2085 | ~95 | 83 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式+最大风扇开启) | ~1.2 | 2160 | 76 | 76 |
发言人
立体声扬声器的声音还不如四声道扬声器的声音大。 扬声器。但是,平衡性还是值得尊敬的。由于风扇太大,游戏时声音质量明显下降。
HP Omen 16-wf000 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 更大的电池,更短的寿命
消耗功率
即使在iGPU处于激活状态且亮度设置为最低的情况下,空闲时的耗电量也比预期的要高。这个高的底线可能是下面一节中电池寿命较短的原因。
幸运的是,游戏时的消耗量显示出明显的改善,超过了 AMD驱动的2022 Omen 16.运行时 Witcher 3平均只多消耗4%的电量,同时提供1.5倍到2倍的GPU性能。 Radeon RX 6650M.仅这一事实就可以解释为什么惠普决定放弃今年Omen 16的任何Radeon选项,因为Ada Lovelace的每瓦性能优势是惊人的。
具有相同RTX 4080 GPU的竞争笔记本电脑,如ROG Strix G16或Blade 16,在运行同一标题时,都比我们的惠普系统多需要30瓦。然而,他们也配备了快得多的酷睿i9 HX CPU来进行补偿。
当CPU和GPU的利用率为100%时,我们能够从中等尺寸(约18 x 8.8 x 2.4厘米)的280 W交流适配器中记录到270 W的临时最大功耗。一个更大的330瓦交流适配器很可能是多余的。
Off / Standby | 1.8 / 3 Watt |
Idle | 21.8 / 26 / 36 Watt |
Load |
115.5 / 269.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1" | HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 34% | -17% | -9% | 11% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 21.8 | 7.9 64% | 25.2 -16% | 20 8% | 10 54% | 15.2 30% |
Idle Average * | 26 | 11.5 56% | 29.9 -15% | 25 4% | 16 38% | 22.8 12% |
Idle Maximum * | 36 | 18.3 49% | 49.8 -38% | 35 3% | 27 25% | 49.8 -38% |
Load Average * | 115.5 | 88.1 24% | 105.4 9% | 136 -18% | 129 -12% | 121.2 -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 214 | 206 4% | 263 -23% | 282 -32% | 247 -15% | 242 -13% |
Load Maximum * | 269.7 | 246.4 9% | 313.8 -16% | 320 -19% | 342 -27% | 273.7 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量从去年型号的68Wh增加到83Wh。不幸的是,电池寿命比以前短了近2个整小时。我们能够记录的无线局域网运行时间刚刚超过5小时,类似于 Legion 笔记本电脑7 即使是在iGPU激活的平衡电源配置文件下。
使用附带的桶式交流电适配器,从空电到满电大约需要90分钟。该系统也可以通过USB-C充电,但不保证兼容性。例如,连接我们的130瓦戴尔USB-C交流适配器会导致弹出信息,声称不兼容,而我们的135瓦联想USB-C适配器可以充电,没有任何问题。
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M, 68 Wh | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 40% | -18% | 0% | 43% | 34% | |
Reader / Idle | 328 | 599 83% | 436 33% | 533 63% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 307 | 418 36% | 149 -51% | 308 0% | 583 90% | 365 19% |
Load | 68 | 68 0% | 44 -35% | 65 -4% | 81 19% |
Pros
Cons
结论--薄而有吸引力的设计,进入门槛低
也许2023 Omen 16最有利可图的方面是它的起价,即酷睿i7-13700HX、RTX 4060和16GB内存配置的1100美元。这是一个中端机箱,具有更好的制造质量和更时尚的设计,比类似价格的预算游戏笔记本电脑如 微星Katana, 戴尔G16系列或 华硕TUF F系列.如果你在市场上购买RTX 4060笔记本电脑,而不必满足于廉价的塑料材料,那么Omen 16是值得考虑的。
新机型比前代产品略厚、略宽,电池寿命也较短,但这些变化可以说是值得的,因为CPU和GPU性能要快得多。尽管尺寸不同,但重量基本保持不变,大多数玩家可能不会介意较短的运行时间。
2023 Omen 16的外观和性能比其低起价所显示的要好。
Omen 16缺少的两个值得注意的功能是支持DCI-P3和集成SD读卡器。这些并不影响该系统的核心游戏体验,但同时也是内容创作者的游戏者可能要考虑Alienware x16 R1或 Razer Blade 16它们提供读卡器、更宽的颜色和更高的原始分辨率。当然,这些兼职的替代品也明显更贵。
价格和可用性
2023 Omen 16现在直接从惠普发货,基本的RTX 4060配置起价1100美元,而我们审查的RTX 4080配置则是2600美元。
HP Omen 16-wf000
- 09/13/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.