戴尔XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070笔记本电脑评论:既令人印象深刻又令人失望
XPS 15 9530是比2022年的XPS 15 9520的内部更新。去年型号上的第12代Alder Lake-H CPU和Nvidia Ampere GPU已分别升级为第13代Raptor Lake-H和Ada Lovelace选项。除此以外,机箱和显示器选项同比仍然相同,因此我们建议查看我们现有的对 XPS 15 9520, 9510, 和 9500 以了解更多关于该型号的物理特征。
我们的具体审查单位是一个更高端的配置,配备酷睿i7-13700H,RTX 4070,32GB内存,1TB SSD,以及光面3.5K OLED触摸屏,价格约为2800美元。其他SKU有更快的酷睿i9-13900H,更慢的RTX 4060,或更低分辨率的雾面FHD+面板。请注意,这是极少数配备50瓦GeForce RTX 4070的笔记本电脑之一,而其他大多数配备相同GPU的笔记本电脑则为100瓦或以上。
竞争者包括其他高端15英寸多媒体笔记本电脑,如华硕Zenbook Pro 15, MSI Summit E15,技嘉Aero 15,或 Razer Blade 15 Studio.
更多戴尔评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3456x2160 | |
89.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3456x2160 | |
90.1 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD i7-10875H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 2 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2400 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 20.1 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 自XPS 15 9500以来没有重大变化
SD卡阅读器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
沟通
一个英特尔AX211的标准配置是支持Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.2。我们能够毫无问题地连接到我们的华硕AXE11000 Wi-Fi 6网络,但笔记本电脑很奇怪地不能识别或连接到我们的6GHz Wi-Fi 6E网络。其他支持Wi-Fi 6E的设备,如 像素7 Pro可以识别并连接到我们的6GHz网络,没有任何问题。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 |
网络摄像头 - 100万像素的分辨率越来越令人尴尬
最新的XPS 15 *仍然*依赖一个低分辨率的100万像素/720p网络摄像头,尽管它的要价超过2000美元。竞争机型如 HP Spectre x360 16或Razer Blade系列已经转向200万像素或甚至500万像素的传感器。不用说,在原本漂亮的OLED显示屏上,图片质量非常模糊。至少支持红外线。
戴尔表示,低分辨率的网络摄像头是笔记本电脑上最窄的边框之一的结果。据称,一个更高分辨率的网络摄像头会使边框变厚。
维护
配件和保修
戴尔仍然在每个零售盒内包括一个方便的USB-C转USB-A和HDMI适配器,我们对此表示赞赏。通常的一年有限制造商保修适用。
显示屏--3.5K的三星OLED看起来仍然令人惊讶
戴尔在其2023年和2022年的XPS 15机型上采用了相同的三星156XG01 OLED面板,使它们之间有类似的观看体验。这不一定是坏事,因为三星面板仍然提供完整的DCI-P3色彩和清晰的画面,但我们很希望在未来看到90赫兹或更快的面板选项。 某些华硕VivoBook机型例如,配备120赫兹的OLED面板,以获得更流畅的视觉体验。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 389.5 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.53
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6" | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q Samsung ATNA56YX03-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 Sharp LQ156D1JW42, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Samsung SDC4143, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | -3% | -12% | -9% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 97.8 -2% | 89.7 -10% | 79.3 -21% | 80.48 -19% | 99.9 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 95.6 -4% | 96.95 -3% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.4 | 86 -13% | 99.8 1% | 87.3 -11% | 94.02 -4% | 99.5 1% |
Response Times | -29% | -2363% | -40% | -2088% | -23% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.68 ? | 1.9 ? -13% | 54 ? -3114% | 2.1 ? -25% | 51 ? -2936% | 2.8 ? -67% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.94 ? | 1.9 ? 2% | 33.2 ? -1611% | 2.3 ? -19% | 26 ? -1240% | 2 ? -3% |
PWM Frequency | 239 | 59.52 ? -75% | 60.2 -75% | 240 ? 0% | ||
Screen | -0% | -17% | 13% | 18% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 389.5 | 381.4 -2% | 557.9 43% | 342.9 -12% | 441 13% | 440 13% |
Brightness | 392 | 384 -2% | 541 38% | 346 -12% | 416 6% | 446 14% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 95 -3% | 91 -7% | 98 0% | 85 -13% | 92 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.155 | 0.04 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.95 | 4.34 12% | 4.54 8% | 2.42 51% | 1.51 69% | 2.53 49% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.65 | 9.24 -7% | 7.92 8% | 4.05 53% | 3.56 59% | 7.82 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.53 | 3.82 -150% | 2.57 -68% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2 -0% | 3.2 -60% | 2.1 -5% | 2.49 -25% | 1.2 40% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.13 103% | 1.99 111% | 2.21 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.206 100% |
CCT | 6265 104% | 6210 105% | 6451 101% | 6364 102% | 6292 103% | 6371 102% |
Contrast | 1431 | 2845 | 11000 | |||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.5 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-9% | -794% /
-405% | -13% /
-7% | -693% /
-372% | -5% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
该面板开箱即被校准,但用户仍然可以应用我们上面的校准过的ICM配置文件来略微提高色彩准确性。戴尔最终将各种颜色配置文件(如sRGB、AdobeRGB、DCI-P3和其他)整合到了Windows显示菜单上,以方便配置文件的切换。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.97 ms rise | |
↘ 0.97 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise | |
↘ 0.88 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 239 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 239 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 239 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在所有亮度水平上都存在闪烁,就像其他笔记本电脑上的OLED面板一样。我们能够记录从0到52%亮度的240赫兹频率,以及从53%到100%亮度的60赫兹频率。
性能 - 第13代英特尔+GeForce RTX 4070图形
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将设备设置为性能和dGPU模式。不支持Advanced Optimus或MUX。
处理器
由于该系统的Turbo Boost潜力有限,CPU的性能是一个混合的袋子。例如,我们的 酷睿i7-13700HCineBench R15 xT得分将比 i7-12700H去年的XPS 15 9520中的i7-12700H。然而,经过几个基准循环后,性能差距将缩小,并更接近去年的处理器。较小的微星Stealth 14 Studio,采用了与我们的XPS 15 9530相同的Core i7-13700H CPU,也会表现出类似的节流行为。
升级到 酷睿i9-13900H配置,预计可以将性能提高15%至25%。然而,好处可能更少,因为酷睿i9处理器在像XPS 15这样的薄型多媒体笔记本电脑上往往会有更剧烈的节流。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 -1! | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=28) | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 278, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=28) | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=28) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=28) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28) | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD -9! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12872 - 52727, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7158 - 7956, n=8) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10252 - 11449, n=8) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8501 - 10769, n=8) | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10358 - 12908, n=8) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1768 - 2073, n=6) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1645 - 2006, n=6) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1936 - 2137, n=6) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1451 - 2202, n=6) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
PCMark 10 Score | 7253 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (24334 - 78081, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (23681 - 79656, n=28) | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (22986 - 99898, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=28) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。4K60视频播放也不完美,在我们长达1分钟的测试视频中出现了4个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 多达两个PCIe4驱动器
我们的评测单元采用的是 SK Hynix PC801PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,而不是我们旧版XPS 15 9510测试单元上的WD SN810。这两块固态硬盘的性能通常是相当的,但它们落后于流行的三星PM9A1。
性能的可持续性很好,在压力下没有节流。在结账时没有提供PCIe5固态硬盘,这太糟糕了。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--一半的TGP等于一半的功率
很明显,图形性能应该比 "平均 "GeForce RTX 4070笔记本电脑因为XPS 15的50W TGP目标很低,但我们不知道是多少。现在我们有一个测试装置在手,根据3DMark基准测试,赤字可能是相当惊人的,比我们数据库的平均速度慢40%至50%。它是如此糟糕,甚至像惠普Omen 15这样的四年前的RTX 2070笔记本电脑也能与我们更昂贵的RTX 4070 XPS 15表现差不多。如果你打算玩很多游戏,那么XPS 15就成为一个糟糕的价值主张。
好消息是,图形性能仍然比 RTX 3050 Ti快了大约30%到35%。因此,尽管这是我们所见过的移动RTX 4070最慢的迭代之一,但还是有一个明显的同比提升。
有趣的是,相对于50W的TGP,运行3D软件工具时的图形加速要比预期的快得多。例如,采用CUDA加速的Blender Classroom只需46秒就能完成,这比一般的RTX 4070笔记本慢25%,而100W或更高的TGP是典型的。老式的RTX 3050 Ti在相同的基准测试中会花费几乎2.5倍的时间。因此,内容创作者在选择2023年的XPS 15时,将比旧型号受益最大。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F -1! | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB -1! | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD -2! | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK -2! | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti -2! | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD -2! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 22258 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13535 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5860 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=60) | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=63) | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 440, n=59) |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
尽管上述RTX 4070的性能令人失望,但该系统仍然可以在1080p和60FPS的中高设置下运行任何当前的标题。然而,再高的话,GPU就会开始挣扎。像《赛博朋克2077》或《Returnal》 这样的高要求游戏,如果设置高于中等水平,就会在没有G-Sync帮助的情况下出现明显的屏幕撕裂。除了像《DOTA 2》这样要求不高的多人游戏外,大多数游戏几乎不能在原生3.5K分辨率下运行。
此外,游戏时性能可能不稳定。闲置时的帧率 Witcher 3会周期性地从50FPS下降到40FPS,然后似乎没有任何理由地跳回50FPS。这种行为表明后台活动的优先级不高。
另一个不幸的缺点是,非常低的设置下的帧率有时会比高设置下的帧率慢。这是在低1080p设置下运行《赛博朋克2077》和《Returnal》 时观察到的,即使经过重复测试,帧率也一直比中等1080p设置下的慢。这种行为表明,当CPU和GPU都受到压力时,PSU的限制和随之而来的CPU和GPU之间的权力斗争。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F -1! | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD -3! | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
Returnal | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (65 - 119, n=11) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69 - 117, n=12) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (64 - 106, n=12) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
1920x1080 Epic Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54 - 90, n=12) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
2560x1440 Epic Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (39 - 66, n=12) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
3840x2160 Epic Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (21 - 39, n=8) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 180 | 168.1 | 134.3 | 63.5 | 52.9 | 53 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 354.2 | 233.3 | 123.9 | 69.8 | 47 | 26.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 189.5 | 163.1 | 147.6 | 137 | 88.4 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 108.6 | 84 | 66 | 48.8 | 26.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 134.2 | 91.6 | 90.6 | 67.3 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 334 | 172.1 | 136.6 | 117.7 | 79.9 | 42.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 55.3 | 70 | 57.5 | 48 | 30 | 12.8 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 98.1 | 92.5 | 74.3 | 58.6 | 49.8 | 39.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 155.1 | 148.5 | 123.5 | 39.2 | 10.6 | 4.7 |
Returnal (2023) | 65 | 69 | 64 | 54 | 39 | 21 |
排放
系统噪音 - 对尺寸来说不算太大
在浏览网页或流媒体视频时,风扇噪音往往徘徊在24 dB(A)左右,而安静的背景为23 dB(A),几乎听不见。引入更高的负载,如游戏,将诱发40至45分贝(A)之间的风扇噪音,这是安静比华硕Zenbook Pro 15或Gigabyte Aero 15在负载下更安静。XPS 15通常不像其他高性能15英寸多媒体笔记本电脑那样吵闹。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.1 / 23.1 / 24.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 27.1 / 44.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 512GB | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-1280P, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | -24% | -7% | -22% | -35% | |
off / environment * | 23.1 | 22.8 1% | 28.4 -23% | 22.8 1% | 26 -13% | 25 -8% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.1 | 22.9 1% | 28.4 -23% | 22.9 1% | 26 -13% | 30 -30% |
Idle Average * | 23.1 | 22.9 1% | 28.4 -23% | 22.9 1% | 30.7 -33% | 32 -39% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.2 | 22.9 5% | 28.4 -17% | 22.9 5% | 30.7 -27% | 35 -45% |
Load Average * | 27.1 | 30.9 -14% | 46 -70% | 33.2 -23% | 41.9 -55% | 44 -62% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.1 | 37.8 6% | 42 -5% | 47.3 -18% | 51 -27% | |
Load Maximum * | 44.6 | 44.7 -0% | 47.1 -6% | 52.8 -18% | 40.7 9% | 60 -35% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于薄型机箱的高功率密度,即使只是在桌面上空转,表面温度也相对较高,约为30℃。然而,这与去年的机型没有任何不同,因为电源包络线大致保持不变。在运行游戏等高要求的负载时,机箱底部的皮肤温度在45摄氏度,会让人感觉不舒服。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 Intel Core i7-1280P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -5% | -2% | -4% | -3% | -9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.6 | 51.4 -13% | 44 4% | 36 21% | 49 -7% | 45 1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 51 -21% | 48.8 -16% | 47.2 -12% | 52.6 -25% | 54 -29% |
Idle Upper Side * | 34.4 | 30 13% | 33 4% | 37 -8% | 29.7 14% | 34 1% |
Idle Bottom * | 33.2 | 33 1% | 32.4 2% | 39.2 -18% | 30.7 8% | 36 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试--CPU温度过高
在启动Prime95压力时,CPU将提升到3.7 GHz和96 W,只有一两秒钟。这将稳步下降到只有2.7 GHz和55 W,因为当CPU完全受压时,核心温度非常高,达到88至100 C。相比之下,在配备AMD的华硕Zenbook Pro 15 UM5上重复这个相同的测试 华硕Zenbook Pro 15 UM535Q戴尔系统的核心温度高于平均水平并不令人惊讶,因为这是XPS 15系列的一个共同特征。因此,升级到酷睿i9配置可能最多只是带来一点好处,因为我们的酷睿i7配置已经接近100℃的上限。
当运行 Witcher 3代表典型的游戏负载时,GPU将稳定在1590 MHz核心,1375 MHz内存,70 C和43 W,而目标是50 W。在较大的联合利华GM6PX7X IDX在更强大的130W RTX 4070上重复同样的测试将导致稳定的核心时钟、内存时钟、温度和GPU功率分别为2370MHz、2125MHz、73C和100W。在这个例子中,50W和100+W RTX 4070之间的性能差异非常明显。
令人惊讶的是,在电池电源上运行并不影响性能,这对任何GeForce RTX供电的笔记本电脑来说都是罕见的。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为20751和24569分,而在主电源上则为18112和24229分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 52 | 46 |
Prime95压力 | 2.4 | -- | 88 | 62 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.4 | ~1095 | 93 | 75 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~0.9 | 1590 | 72 | 70 |
发言人
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - Core H和GeForce RTX on USB-C
消耗功率
与去年的机型相比,耗电量普遍较高。例如,当在桌面上以最低设置空转时,XPS 15 9530将消耗约20瓦,而旧版XPS 15 9520只有5至6瓦。当游戏时,消耗量将高出约25%,这意味着比老款RTX 3050 Ti的额外性能并不完全是免费的。
我们能够从中小型(约14.3 x 6.6 x 2.2厘米)的130瓦交流适配器中记录到133瓦的临时最大消耗。XPS 15是首批同时采用Core H系列CPU和GeForce RTX 4070 GPU的笔记本电脑之一,完全由USB-C供电。这在便携性和多功能性方面当然有其优势,但由于电源包络有限,性能和充电会受到影响。例如,从空到满的充电时间比平时慢,约为2.5小时,如果同时运行高要求的负载,这将更慢。
值得庆幸的是,在游戏或运行高要求的负载时,电池不会像我们观察到的那样,慢慢耗尽。 旧的XPS 17型号.
Off / Standby | 0.51 / 1.67 Watt |
Idle | 20 / 20.7 / 22.4 Watt |
Load |
77.1 / 133.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 512GB, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD i7-10875H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, SK Hynix PC611 512GB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6" | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 28% | 12% | 34% | 51% | -39% | |
Idle Minimum * | 20 | 5.5 72% | 5.7 71% | 5.5 72% | 5.4 73% | 23 -15% |
Idle Average * | 20.7 | 7.2 65% | 13.5 35% | 7.4 64% | 11.8 43% | 26 -26% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.4 | 16 29% | 19.6 12% | 14.9 33% | 12.7 43% | 34 -52% |
Load Average * | 77.1 | 91.8 -19% | 114.1 -48% | 78.2 -1% | 45.9 40% | 99 -28% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 95.4 | 74.6 22% | 93 3% | 80.1 16% | 45.7 52% | 163 -71% |
Load Maximum * | 133.4 | 134.7 -1% | 135.2 -1% | 110.9 17% | 63 53% | 190 -42% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命 - 稍微短一些,但还不错
运行时间普遍比去年的机型短,这并不奇怪,因为第13代英特尔CPU和GeForce 40 GPU的功率包络与它们各自的前辈相似。我们能够记录8小时的实际WLAN使用时间,或比2022年的XPS 15短40分钟。尽管比华硕Zenbook Pro 15等竞争机型的时间短一些,但仍然不错。
电池寿命可以通过在OLED配置上显示较深的颜色而不是白色来延长,详见 这里.我们预计较低分辨率的IPS SKU将提供比我们在这里记录的更长的运行时间。
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD i7-10875H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 86 Wh | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 96 Wh | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 52% | 50% | 110% | 2% | 6% | |
Reader / Idle | 688 | 886 29% | 1382 101% | 1571 128% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 481 | 528 10% | 546 14% | 766 59% | 531 10% | 508 6% |
Load | 89 | 192 116% | 121 36% | 215 142% | 83 -7% | |
H.264 | 423 | |||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 131 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 为了瘦身而牺牲了性能
酷睿i7-13700H和GeForce RTX 4070通常保留给更大的游戏笔记本电脑,如华硕ROG Strix G18或Aorus 15X ASF每个都有笨重的200多瓦的电源砖。把它们塞进像XPS 15这样的低功率薄型设计中当然可以,但性能不可避免地受到重大打击。在这种情况下,TGP已经被削减了一半或更多,每美元的性能很差。如果你打算同时运行图形编辑和游戏,那么像Alienware x15这样的专用游戏机就可以了。 Alienware x15即使配置相同的CPU和GPU,也会以相当大的优势胜过我们的XPS 15。
与具有更高TGP目标的大型笔记本电脑相比,运行图形编辑时的性能打击并不像游戏性能的打击那么严重。这主要是因为即使是50瓦的RTX 4070也带有与100瓦以上版本相同数量的CUDA核心用于加速。因此,XPS 15 9530在内容创作方面表现出色,只有偶尔的游戏。毕竟,这是一台Nvidia Studio笔记本电脑。
如果你想平衡性能和便携性,XPS 15 9530是值得拥有的内容创作笔记本电脑。然而,不要指望它的性能会像其他大多数具有相同GPU的笔记本电脑一样。
我们希望在未来的机型上看到很多变化。首先,更新的90赫兹或120赫兹刷新率的显示器选项将对改善用户体验大有帮助。第二,720p的网络摄像头是非常糟糕的,因为它感觉甚至与十年前没有变化。第三,可能采用液态金属的修正冷却解决方案可以帮助提高Turbo Boost性能,而不需要加厚设计。最后,DPC问题、跳帧和掉帧问题当然应该得到关注,特别是对于一个面向内容创作的旗舰笔记本电脑。XPS 15有很多值得喜欢的地方,特别是如果你看重其类似MacBook Pro的便携性,但里面的处理器已经超过了机箱,并因此感到有些受限。
价格和可用性
在撰写本文时,XPS 15 9530还没有通过零售商广泛销售。获得机型的最佳机会是直接通过戴尔。基本配置的价格从2250美元开始,如果完全配置了最大的存储和内存,价格将达到4700美元。
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
- 04/23/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.