
Apple iPad Air 13 (2025) 平板电脑评测--几乎和 iPad Pro 一样好,但价格便宜很多
大顶级。
2025 年,iPad Air 的处理器得到了升级:Apple M3 现在可以提供强大的动力,应该会使这款平板电脑成为市场上速度最快的产品之一。在我们的测试中,我们看到了Apple 为使其 12.9 英寸平板电脑与时俱进而采取的其他措施。Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Apple iPad Air 13(2025 年)评测
iPad Air 13 只是在 2025 年进行了一次小更新:Apple M3 为已经非常强大的 iPad Air 提供了更强劲的动力,并略微延长了其运行时间。其配件也略有调整。除此以外,iPad Air 2024 的其他方面基本保持不变:外观设计、四种颜色、外壳尺寸、IPS 屏幕和功能都没有变化。
这也意味着,iPad 的优缺点基本保持不变--例如,它的无 PWM 显示屏、较长的更新周期、一系列可持续发展措施以及在任何环境下都很美观的高品质外壳。Apple ,新的 SoC 还保持了平板电脑的低散热性,并设法更好地控制了负载下的节流。
由于充电功率仅为 20 瓦,因此充电仍需要一段时间,而且蓝牙编解码器的数量也很少。此外,按照Apple 的典型方式,存储空间较大的机型的附加费几乎高得离谱。
iPad Air 13 2025 是一款非常可靠、高品质和灵活的平板电脑。得益于Apple 手写笔和 Magic Keyboard,你可以用它来代替笔记本电脑,使用它工作的感觉几乎与使用 iPad Pro 一样专业。
它与Apple 顶级平板电脑的不同之处包括:IPS 显示屏亮度不高,没有 FaceID 和 USB 4.0,扬声器系统稍弱。
不过,如果你想节省几百美元,那么这些限制你完全可以接受。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
配备 128GB 存储空间和 WiFi 的基本机型售价 799 美元,新款 iPad Air 机型可直接从以下网站购买Apple.
规格
外壳 - 经典一体成型外壳
乍一看,iPad Air 13(2025)和 2024 型可能很难区分:其尺寸完全相同,重量仅相差 1 克。它的设计也没有变化:平板电脑光滑的一体式金属外壳,闪亮的Apple 徽标和圆角设计,无论从哪个方面看都很美观。
可供选择的颜色也没有任何变化:精致的太空灰、蓝色、紫色或极地之星(一种浅米色)。第 7 代 iPad Air 13 的厚度仅为 6.1 毫米,再次成为一款纤薄的平板电脑。
它的显示屏边框非常窄,四边宽度相同,赋予平板电脑现代的外观,而且使用起来仍然符合人体工程学原理。
同样,它的外壳没有通过 IP 认证,因此最好远离灰尘和湿气。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
连接性 - iPad Air 的稳定价格
其存储配置再次从 128 GB 大容量存储开始,价格与去年相比保持稳定。有以下机型可供选择:
- 8 GB 内存,128 GB 存储空间:799 美元(WiFi)/949 美元(WiFi + 蜂窝电话)
- 8 GB 内存,256 GB 存储空间:899 美元(WiFi)/1049 美元(WiFi + 蜂窝电话)
- 8 GB 内存,512 GB 存储空间:1099 美元(WiFi)/1249 美元(WiFi + 蜂窝电话)
- 8 GB 内存,1 TB 存储空间:1,299 美元(WiFi)/1,449 美元(WiFi + 蜂窝网络连接)
我们测试的是带 WiFi 的最小配置。
USB 4 端口是 iPad Pro 专用的,但 iPad Air 13 (2025) 配备了速度高达 10 GBit/s 的超快 USB 3.1 Gen 2 端口。你可以连接分辨率高达 6,016 x 3,384 的屏幕,帧频为 60Hz。
可使用 NFC,但仍只能将Apple Pay 用作移动支付服务。
软件 - 在欧洲部分地区推出时没有Apple Intelligence
可持续性
在可持续发展方面,Apple 比其他制造商更加主动和积极:iPad 的外壳使用的是完全可回收的铝材,设备中的许多其他材料现在也是可回收的。
值得庆幸的是,Apple 还发布了一份全面的产品环保报告。Apple 称其生产和使用过程中的二氧化碳消耗量为 89 千克。旧产品可以在Apple 上进行交换,然后回收利用。
此外,Apple 还拥有自己的自我维修网站,您可以在网站上订购备件。遗憾的是,iPad 还不能这样做。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 6E 带来极快的传输速率
与前代产品一样,iPad Air 13 iPad Air 13 (2024)2025 机型也支持 WiFi 6E,这意味着它可以利用较少使用的 6 GHz 频段建立无线连接。因此,在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中,其速度最高可达 1,550 MBit/s,不过数据传输速率有时会略有下降。
我们测试的 iPad Air 不是蜂窝网络机型,但也有配备 5G 模块的版本。它可以与 eSIM 卡一起使用,但不能在 iPad 中插入实体 SIM 卡。只有蜂窝版本才额外支持卫星定位服务,因此我们的纯 WLAN 机型不适合导航。不过,它可以通过已知的 WLAN 网络确定自己的大致位置。
相机 - 相当不错,除了在黑暗中
在摄像头硬件方面也没有什么变化:前后各一个 1200 万像素的摄像头可以扫描二维码和文件,并拍摄照片。但也许新的 SoC 在图像处理方面有所改变?
乍一看,几乎没有什么明显的区别:对焦物体看起来很自然,但人工虚化有点不干净。摄像头的细节和清晰度跟不上高端智能手机的水平,但对于平板电脑来说,成像质量还是相当高的。
在弱光环境下,它的弱点会变得更加明显:在较暗的环境中,无法拍摄出足够明亮的照片,在我们的照片实验室中,照度为 1 lux 时,图像中没有任何可辨认的东西。
您可以录制高达 60 帧/秒的 4K 视频,如果需要,也可以录制过去电影中常见的 24 帧/秒视频。它的自动对焦速度快,不易察觉,录制的动态图像清晰度也同样出色。
平板电脑的前置摄像头自拍效果不错,但放大后清晰度一般。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light

配件和保修 - 出色的配件
除 USB 数据线外,iPad 包装盒中几乎没有其他配件。你必须自备充电器或从Apple 购买。
Magic Keyboard 通过 iPad Air 13 背面的磁性基座端口连接,并自带 USB-C 端口为 iPad Air 充电。14 个新功能键可以控制媒体或改变显示屏亮度等。值得肯定的是:与上一代产品相比,Apple ,降低了 Magic Keyboard 的价格。
Apple Pencil 或Apple Pencil Pro 仍与 iPad Air 13(2025 年)兼容--两者都可以通过磁力吸附到平板电脑上。
该平板电脑享有 12 个月的保修服务。
要获得更多保护,你可以购买 AppleCare+ 保险套餐,月费 4.99 美元,年费 49.99 美元。AppleCare+ 承保保险期内不限次数的意外损坏,每次损坏都有小额免赔额。
输入设备和操作 - 精确的触摸屏
显示屏 - 无 PWM
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 607 cd/m²
Contrast: 1214:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.197
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9" | Apple iPad Air 13 2024 IPS, 2732x2048, 13" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2800x1752, 12.4" | Huawei MatePad 12 X IPS, 2800x1840, 12" | OnePlus Pad 2 IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1" | Honor MagicPad 2 OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -2% | -35% | -55% | 8% | 19% | |
Brightness middle | 607 | 631 4% | 471 -22% | 1032 70% | 833 37% | 645 6% |
Brightness | 576 | 589 2% | 473 -18% | 991 72% | 771 34% | 650 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 97 11% | 87 0% | 84 -3% | 94 8% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.62 -24% | 0.92 -84% | 0.45 10% | ||
Contrast | 1214 | 1018 -16% | 1122 -8% | 1851 52% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.52 | 1.5 1% | 3.1 -104% | 3.8 -150% | 1.79 -18% | 1.3 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.5 | 3 14% | 5.8 -66% | 8.6 -146% | 4.01 -15% | 2.1 40% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.2 -0% | 2.4 -9% | 6.5 -195% | 3 -36% | 1.5 32% |
Gamma | 2.197 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.06 107% | 2.18 101% | 2.254 98% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 6929 94% | 6918 94% | 6746 96% | 7197 90% | 6419 101% | 6658 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
35.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise | |
↘ ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise | |
↘ ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). |
性能 - 动力强劲,得益于Apple M3
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision Core ML Neural Engine 1.2 | |
Average of class Tablet (4066 - 4823, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M3 (4158 - 4164, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Half Precision Core ML Neural Engine 1.2 | |
Average of class Tablet (6923 - 36754, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M3 (7042 - 30723, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Quantized Core ML Neural Engine 1.2 | |
Average of class Tablet (5648 - 51561, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M3 (5678 - 34342, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 |
Apple iPad Air 的 GPU 启用了 9 个内核,而 MacBook 则多了一个内核。前代机型 iPad Air 13 (2024)也有 10 个 GPU 内核--从基准测试结果中可以部分看出:目前的 iPad Air 并不总是领先于前代产品。
一些Android 平板电脑中的高通和联发科芯片速度很快,在某些情况下也能多跑几帧。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X |
iPad Air 13 2025 浏览网页的速度非常快,在浏览器基准测试中获得了最高分。只要网络连接良好,即使是非常大的网站也能立即加载,滚动时也无需等待图像。
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Average Apple M3 (305 - 318, n=4) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 (Safari 17) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X (Huawei Browswer 15) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average Apple M3 (548 - 674, n=5) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 (Safari 17) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=62, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Average Apple M3 (33.9 - 34.4, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 (Safari 17) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130) | |
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X (Huawei Browswer 15) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average Apple M3 (92645 - 98093, n=5) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 (Safari 17) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130) | |
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X (Huawei Browswer 15) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=89, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X (Huawei Browswer 15) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 (Safari 17) | |
Average Apple M3 (323 - 373, n=5) | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18) |
* ... smaller is better
Apple 它再次安装了一个组合内存模块,将 NVMe 大容量存储和 RAM 合并在一起。这应该能提高效率。
遗憾的是,目前还没有针对Apple 移动操作系统的基准测试来确定其速度。不过,在我们的测试中,加载时间很短,数据传输也非常快。
游戏 - 最高可达 60 fps
在游戏时,你不能期望帧数超过 60 帧,因为显示器根本无法显示更多的帧数。在我们的测试中,许多要求苛刻的游戏都达到了这一最高帧率,但在非常高的设置下,我们不时注意到帧率出现短暂的下降。此外,《PUBG Mobile》在最高设置下最多只能达到 40 帧/秒。
通过屏幕操作平板电脑运行稳定,其位置传感器也是如此。不过,大显示屏上的控制按钮并不总是很容易触及,因此连接游戏手柄往往是更好的选择。
我们使用GameBench软件测试帧率。
排放 - 减少节流
温度
我们开始了压力测试,并在测试前和使用一小时后测量了机箱的温度。我们注意到背部的局部发热,但温度仍相当适中,为 37.2 °C。
Apple 我们发现 iPad 的温度管理有所改善,因此节流效果也有所改善:在这种情况下 Apple M3在这种情况下,M3 的性能明显优于前代产品,即使在多次运行基准测试后,仍能提供至少 88.4% 的性能。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark stress test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ |
发言人
虽然设备上有四个扬声器开口,但只安装了两个扬声器。它们的音量并不大,但足以让一个中等大小的房间充满声音。声音温暖且相当平衡,但听不到真正的低音。中低音清晰可闻,将平板电脑放在桌上还能感觉到震动。
喜欢连接外部音频设备的用户可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.3 进行连接。这两种方式都能正常工作,但由于只能使用Apple 的 AAC 和低质量的 SBC,因此只有少数几种编解码器可用于无线音频传输。这就限制了兼容蓝牙耳机和扬声器的数量,尤其是在高质量音频传输方面。
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 足够使用一整天
耗电量
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 的整体功耗水平一般;尤其是在极低负载情况下,几乎不需要任何能源。在负载情况下,SoC 的功耗很快就会显现出来,在峰值时,功耗高达 16.9 瓦。
在充电方面,尽管Android 平板电脑的最大充电功率是 20 瓦的五倍,但Apple 依然固执己见,不愿提高充电功率。尽管如此,2:30 小时的完整充电周期还是可以接受的。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 mAh | Apple iPad Air 13 2024 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 10090 mAh | Huawei MatePad 12 X 10100 mAh | Honor MagicPad 2 10050 mAh | Average Apple M3 | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -2% | 8% | -22% | 3% | -46% | 31% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.1 | 2.23 -6% | 3.05 -45% | 4.66 -122% | 3.6 -71% | 2 ? 5% | 1.773 ? 16% |
Idle Average * | 8.3 | 8.45 -2% | 4.57 45% | 9.06 -9% | 6.52 21% | 8.6 ? -4% | 3.79 ? 54% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.5 | 8.53 -0% | 4.65 45% | 9.17 -8% | 6.54 23% | 9.16 ? -8% | 4.36 ? 49% |
Load Average * | 11.9 | 12.52 -5% | 13.35 -12% | 11.9 -0% | 10.63 11% | 26 ? -118% | 9.71 ? 18% |
Load Maximum * | 16.9 | 16.76 1% | 15.55 8% | 11.97 29% | 11.57 32% | 34.6 ? -105% | 13.5 ? 20% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
与前代产品相比,该机型的电池容量相同,均为 36.59 Wh。这样,iPad Air 13(2025)的电池续航时间就比上一代产品多了几分钟,但在实际使用中几乎看不出差别。
在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,13:14 小时的续航时间对于大型平板电脑来说还算可以,但是 华为 MatePad 12 X和 OnePlus Pad 2明显超过了这一数值。
iPad Air 13 (2025) 在连续使用的情况下,可以在沙发上度过雨天,但可能也仅仅是雨天而已。
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 mAh | Apple iPad Air 13 2024 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 10090 mAh | Huawei MatePad 12 X 10100 mAh | OnePlus Pad 2 9510 mAh | Honor MagicPad 2 10050 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | -37% | 28% | 9% | -11% | |
Reader / Idle | 1529 | 1519 -1% | 1469 -4% | |||
H.264 | 829 | 783 -6% | 880 6% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 794 | 771 -3% | 502 -37% | 1017 28% | 866 9% | 606 -24% |
Load | 298 | 272 -9% | 232 -22% |
Notebookcheck 总评分

iPad Air (2025) 再次成为一款非常优质的平板电脑,在许多方面都能与价格昂贵得多的 iPad Pro 相媲美。
Apple iPad Air(2025)非常注重产品的可持续发展,但与此同时,你也不得不忍受一些限制,如蓝牙音频编解码器数量少、充电速度慢等。
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
- 03/27/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe | Amazon: $749.00 List Price: 949€ | 616 g | 128 GB NVMe | 12.90" 2732x2048 265 PPI IPS | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 Apple M2 ⎘ Apple M2 10-Core GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe | Amazon: $924.95 List Price: 949€ | 617 g | 128 GB NVMe | 13.00" 2732x2048 264 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $849.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus... 2. $779.99 SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus... 3. $216.15 Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Plus ... List Price: 1119€ | 571 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 12.40" 2800x1752 266 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
Huawei MatePad 12 X HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $10.96 Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass... 2. $34.90 Case for Huawei Matepad 12 X... 3. $12.99 Protective Case for Huawei M... List Price: 649€ | 555 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.00" 2800x1840 279 PPI IPS | |
OnePlus Pad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: $549.99 List Price: 549€ | 584 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.10" 3000x2120 304 PPI IPS | |
Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $13.96 Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass... 2. $22.98 DWaybox Case for Honor Pad G... 3. $11.99 Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit... List Price: 600€ | 555 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.30" 3000x1920 290 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.