Notebookcheck Logo
Huawei MatePad 12 X Notebookcheck review

适合大学使用的 12 英寸轻便平板电脑，配备手写笔和磨砂显示屏 - 华为 MatePad 12 X 评测

iPad Air 的超薄替代品

Apple iPad Air 的经济型替代品？那么 MatePad 12X 将是您的最佳选择，它配备了经过特殊涂层处理的 PaperMatte 显示屏，支持手写笔，还赠送键盘盖。值得购买吗？
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Tablet

华为 MatePad 12 X 的评价：适合中小学生和大学生的全能无忧套装

华为认为，MatePad 12 X 名称中的 "X "代表发现新的可能性和创意项目。无论如何，MatePad 12 X 都为用户的高效工作奠定了良好的基础。由于支持手写笔，高分辨率的 PaperMatte 显示屏非常适合做笔记。结合智能磁性键盘和超长的运行时间，华为平板电脑为正在寻找轻便小巧的日常数码伴侣的中小学生和大学生提供了强有力的卖点。

如果你实在看不出哑光面板有什么好处，那么你应该看看采用亮光面板的竞争产品--OnePlus Pad 2 或Honor 的 MagicPad 2 都会是有趣的选择。这是因为 PaperMatte 显示屏的微观纳米级蚀刻表面结构在一定程度上降低了色彩还原的亮度。此外，由于黑阶较高，对比度也会受到影响。

平板电脑没有蜂窝网络选项也与 MatePad 12 X 的生产方式不太相符。不过，如果你想在移动中访问网络，那么 Tab P12 Paper 可能是一个合适的Android 替代品。尤其是联想平板电脑的购买者不必尝试与华为的HarmonyOS系统交朋友，因为华为的HarmonyOS系统不允许使用谷歌服务。

Pros

+ 明亮的 IPS 面板
+ 无反光
+ 供货范围广
+ 轻薄
+ 卓越音质

Cons

- 未安装 GNSS 模块
- 没有 4G 选项
- 亚光涂层也有缺点
- 软件缺陷
- 无 IP 等级或指纹传感器
- 没有 6 GHz 无线局域网

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时，华为 MatePad 12 X 尚未在美国发售。您或许可以从指定零售商那里买到进口设备。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
83%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Bestpreis 649€ Alternate
2. 649€ Huawei Shop
3. 649€ galaxus
555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.00"
2800x1840
279 PPI
IPS
2.
86.1%
OnePlus Pad 2
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Bestpreis 450€ Gomibo.de
2. 457.98€ Jacob Elektronik direkt
3. 459€ alza.at
584 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
3000x2120
304 PPI
IPS
3.
84.8%
Honor MagicPad 2
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Bestpreis 441€ Gomibo.de
2. 445€ Gomibo.at
3. 524.9€ alza.de
555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.30"
3000x1920
290 PPI
OLED
4.
74.8%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP4 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Bestpreis 351.9€ alza.de
2. 354.9€ alza.at
615 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash12.70"
2944x1840
273 PPI
LTPS
5.
81.1%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Bestpreis 367.7€ x-kom
2. 369€ Huawei Shop
3. 369.99€ nullprozentshop.de
510 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.50"
2800x1840
291 PPI
TFT-LCD

华为 MatePad 12 X 的 PaperMatte 版采用 12 英寸显示屏，最高刷新率为 144 Hz。这款中端平板电脑采用磨砂表面，并支持华为 M-Pencil 触控笔，作为记笔记和在明亮环境中使用的数码伴侣，提供了一个有趣的整体解决方案。制造商自己也表示，其平板电脑具有特别自然的书写感觉和纸张般的使用效果。

华为 MatePad 12 X 的规格

Huawei MatePad 12 X (MatePad 12 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W 12 x 1.5 - 2.5 GHz
Graphics adapter
HiSilicon Maleoon 910
Memory
12 GB 
Display
12.00 inch 4.57:3, 2800 x 1840 pixel 279 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, Digitizer, HDR: HLG, HDR10, glossy: no, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 226 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, hall sensor, position sensor, OTG, NearLink
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.9 x 270 x 183
Battery
10100 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Huawei HarmonyOS
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/​1.8, AF) + 8 MPix (f/​2.2, wide angle), Camera2 API: limited
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/​2.2, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: six speakers, charger, keyboard, USB cable, HarmonyOS 4.2, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
555 g, Power Supply: 103 g
Price
649 Euro
Links
Huawei homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - MatePad 12 X，纤薄边框

白色版 MatePad 12 X
白色版 MatePad 12 X

MatePad 12 X 重量仅为 555 克，机身厚度不到 6 毫米，尽管采用了 12 英寸显示屏，但使用起来非常舒适。此外，华为平板电脑的屏占比超过 86%，让人感觉非常现代。外壳没有 IP 认证。

MatePad 12 X 的做工质量非常好--铝制边框和玻璃后壳（表面覆盖珍珠贝母）让人感觉它是一款高档中端设备，而且不易沾染指纹。华为尚未向客户透露正面和背面使用的是哪种玻璃。

华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测

尺寸比较

❌
293.4 mm 190.8 mm 6.9 mm 615 g274.5 mm 180.5 mm 5.8 mm 555 g270 mm 183 mm 5.9 mm 555 g268.7 mm 195 mm 6.49 mm 584 g261 mm 177.3 mm 6.2 mm 510 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 配备 USB 3.2 的华为平板电脑

在连接性方面，华为平板电脑配备了不可扩展的 UFS 3.1 存储和 USB OTG 以及蓝牙 5.2。此外，NearLink 短距离无线技术可用于 Matepad 12 X 与 M-Pencil（第三代）或智能磁性键盘之间的数据交互。

通过 USB 接口进行的数据传输采用 3.0 标准（3.2 Gen 1），也支持图像传输。在复制测试中，我们使用 M2.SSD 硬盘（三星 980 Pro）从端口获得了 282 MB/s 的速度。连接的数据载体不仅可以用 FAT32 格式化，还可以用 exFAT 和 NTFS 格式化。

软件 - 华为平板电脑仍未配备 GMS

华为的这款 PaperMatte 平板电脑安装了基于过时的Android 12 的 HarmonyOS 4.2 版。不过，制造商只使用了操作系统的开源部分，这意味着大多数Android 应用程序都可以安装在 MatePad 12 X 上。不过，由于商业限制，谷歌移动服务（GMS）不可用。如果不采取额外步骤，就无法访问 PlayStore。我们在详细指南中介绍了如何在华为平板电脑上设置谷歌服务和应用程序。.

您可以使用 AppGallery 直接安装开箱即用的应用程序；也可以通过 Petal 搜索安装第三方来源的 APK，不过这可能会带来安全风险。不过，内部搜索功能可能不会再继续开发；相反，华为现在依靠的是极光商店。它可以通过 AppGallery 安装，并提供对 Google Play 商店库的访问。

华为打算在多长时间内为其中档平板电脑提供软件更新，目前还没有官方消息。在测试时，尽管运行的是Android 12，但 MatePad 12 X 从 2024 年 9 月开始提供相当最新的安全补丁。

华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测

可持续性

可持续发展并不是 MatePad 12 X 的重点。制造商没有提供任何关于材料提取或可回收性的信息。不过，华为确实提供了一个电子垃圾回收计划，将铜或铝等原材料和塑料分离出来，用于生产新的电子产品。

这款中端平板电脑的包装似乎不含塑料。设备本身、触控笔和键盘都用铝箔纸包裹，其余包装则由硬纸板制成。

通信和全球导航卫星系统

在我们的测试中，支持 WiFi 6 的 MatePad 12 X 在 5 GHz 频率范围内使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器实现了超过 1,000 MBit/s 的峰值传输速率。它的高数据传输速率也基本稳定。用户无法选择使用蜂窝数据。遗憾的是，华为平板电脑也不支持卫星定位服务。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 (sort by value)
Huawei MatePad 12 X
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1025 (510min - 1036max) MBit/s
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
867 (453min - 934max) MBit/s -15%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
873 (734min - 940max) MBit/s -15%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1015 (495min - 1037max) MBit/s -1%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=121)
870 MBit/s -15%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1710, n=82, last 2 years)
537 MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 (sort by value)
Huawei MatePad 12 X
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
883 (798min - 942max) MBit/s
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
937 (892min - 952max) MBit/s +6%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
673 (516min - 740max) MBit/s -24%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
876 (737min - 950max) MBit/s -1%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=119)
834 MBit/s -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=82, last 2 years)
517 MBit/s -41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz (sort by value)
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
895 (675min - 1017max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (770 - 1902, n=16)
1308 MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (691 - 1888, n=13, last 2 years)
1362 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz (sort by value)
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
1652 (1472min - 1703max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (666 - 1816, n=18)
1178 MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (666 - 1842, n=15, last 2 years)
1352 MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
OnePlus Pad 2 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø894 (675-1017)
OnePlus Pad 2 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1652 (1472-1703)
Huawei MatePad 12 X 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1008 (510-1036)
Huawei MatePad 12 X 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø882 (798-942)

摄像头 - 配备双摄像头的 MatePad 12 X

华为 MatePad 12 X 上的自拍照
华为 MatePad 12 X 上的自拍照

前置 800 万像素摄像头采用固定对焦。照片质量尚可，但曝光和清晰度在同价位产品中确实应该更加均衡。这款中端平板电脑可以 30fps 的全高清画质录制视频。

后置摄像头系统的核心是一个 1300 万像素镜头，自动对焦，光圈为 f/1.8。没有光学防抖功能。MatePad 12 X 可在日光下拍摄出清晰的照片。遗憾的是，在日常使用过程中，色彩还原在冷色和暖色之间波动。不过，在可控的照明条件下，华为平板电脑在我们的测量中表现出了良好的色彩还原能力。华为平板电脑非常适合为文档拍照，以便日后添加注释。

华为平板电脑还配备了广角摄像头，但质量一般。不过，800 万像素的镜头拥有更好的色彩平衡。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
3x
3x
5x
5x
10倍（最大值）
10倍（最大值）
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleLow lightBook pages
ColorChecker
3.9 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad 12 X: 4.65 ∆E min: 1.37 - max: 11.61 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
62.5 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
74.9 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
86.9 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad 12 X: 46.03 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 86.95 ∆E

配件和保修 - 配备电源装置的中端平板电脑

MatePad 12 X 的配件
MatePad 12 X 的配件

MatePad 12 X 的送货范围值得称赞。包装盒内有 66 瓦电源适配器、智能磁性键盘、抛光布、USB 线缆（USB-A 至 USB-C）和信息资料。

该设备享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。

输入设备与操作 - 配备 FaceUnlock 的华为平板电脑

MatePad 12 X 配备了第三代华为 M-Pencil 和智能磁性键盘，开箱即可进行高效工作。键盘行程平缓，但由于尺寸较大，使用起来仍然很舒适。不过，受力点比较松软。遗憾的是，智能磁性键盘没有背光，平板电脑本身也没有振动电机。

根据制造商的说法，M-Pencil（第三代）支持超过 10,000 级压力，某些应用程序还支持 16,384 级压力感应手写功能。它的响应时间很短，但华为没有提供任何延迟信息。得益于 IPS 面板 144 Hz 的超高刷新率和磨砂玻璃表面，在平板电脑上书写和绘画的感觉非常棒。虽然并不能完全达到广告中所说的耐磨损效果--就像在纸上书写一样，但 PaperMatte 显示屏仍然比反光面板感觉更自然。用手指滚动或浏览菜单时，屏幕的显示效果也非常漂亮流畅。不过，在日常使用中，华为平板电脑有时会出现轻微的延迟。

遗憾的是，你无法使用生物手指识别技术解锁平板电脑。反过来，用户可以通过安全性较低的 2D 面部识别（使用前置摄像头）进行身份验证。在光线充足的日常使用过程中，这种方式运行稳定，而且可以保存五个配置文件。

华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测

显示屏 - MatePad 12 X 采用哑光 IPS 面板

LC 显示器采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。
LC 显示器采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

MatePad 12 X 的显示屏分辨率为 2,800 x 1,840 像素，对角线尺寸达到了令人印象深刻的 12 英寸。反过来，这也意味着它的像素密度只有 280 ppi--"智能分辨率 "功能也必须关闭才能正常工作。如果需要，它最高 144 Hz 的高刷新率还能在不同频率（30 Hz、60 Hz、90 Hz、120 Hz、144 Hz）之间自动切换。

该显示器的最大亮度被制造商规定为 1,000 cd/m²。在我们的测量过程中，IPS 面板也达到了类似的水平，最大亮度为 1,050 cd/m²（APL18：1,036 cd/m²），在这个价格范围内算是非常不错了。不过，它的照明还可以更均匀一些。MatePad 12 X 没有使用脉宽调制来控制亮度，在我们的测量中也没有出现任何闪烁。

968
cd/m²		992
cd/m²		1050
cd/m²
914
cd/m²		1032
cd/m²		1016
cd/m²
942
cd/m²		967
cd/m²		1041
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1050 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 991.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 1032 cd/m²
Contrast: 1122:1 (Black: 0.92 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Huawei MatePad 12 X
IPS, 2800x1840, 12"		OnePlus Pad 2
IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"		Honor MagicPad 2
OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"		Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"		Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
TFT-LCD, 2800x1840, 11.5"
Screen
29%
26%
-8%
-17%
Brightness middle
1032
833
-19%
645
-37%
148
-86%
511
-50%
Brightness
991
771
-22%
650
-34%
139
-86%
449
-55%
Brightness Distribution
87
84
-3%
94
8%
90
3%
83
-5%
Black Level *
0.92
0.45
51%
0.3
67%
0.99
-8%
Contrast
1122
1851
65%
493
-56%
516
-54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.8
1.79
53%
1.3
66%
3.59
6%
3.6
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.6
4.01
53%
2.1
76%
5.52
36%
7.5
13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.5
3
54%
1.5
77%
3
54%
5.5
15%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.254 98%
2.25 98%
2.243 98%
2.27 97%
CCT
7197 90%
6419 101%
6658 98%
7115 91%
7566 86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们使用 Calman 软件和分光光度计对显示器进行了测量，结果表明 IPS 显示屏的校准效果令人满意，但其灰度明显超出了理想范围（<3），并显示出明显的绿色偏色。对比度约为 1,100:1，也不太理想，这是因为它的黑度非常高，为 0.92 cd/m²。APL 测量结果（0.88 cd/m²）证实对比度稍好一些。

由于面板采用了特殊涂层，可能需要在这些方面做出一些妥协，如 MatePad 11.5 S也显示出类似的不足。华为宣传其 PaperMatte 面板不会对显示质量造成明显影响，但在我们看来，亚光涂层确实会影响色彩还原的亮度和清晰度。

色彩精确度（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，暖色）
色彩精确度（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，暖色）
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，暖色）
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，暖色）
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，暖色）
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，暖色）
色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，暖色）
色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，暖色）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
14.96 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.448 ms rise
↘ 10.51 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.77 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.376 ms rise
↘ 19.39 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

得益于玻璃面板的纳米级微蚀刻表面，MatePad 12 X 可以产生漫反射，没有明显的眩光。这意味着这款平板电脑可以在户外很好地使用，此外，由于面板的亮度很高，即使在夏天阳光直射的情况下也不会受到任何限制。IPS 面板的视角稳定性很好，色彩也没有变化。

华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测
华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测

性能 - 搭载自制 SoC 的华为平板电脑

华为目前在处理器方面非常低调，MatePad 12 X 的规格表中甚至没有出现 SoC。从系统应用程序（设备信息 HW）中可以读出 "麒麟 T90A "的名称，它应该对应于 麒麟 9000WL和麒麟 9000W 在 MatePad 11.5 S和 MatePad Pro 13.2.这是因为这两款内部 SoC 在 Geekbench 基准测试中的性能水平非常接近。因此，MatePad 12 X 在中端平板电脑中具有很强的竞争力，即使是 骁龙 8s Gen 3在 MagicPad 2更强大。

Geekbench 6.3 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1986 Points +62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (1174 - 1343, n=4)
1248 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1245 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
1229 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)
1093 Points -11%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
964 Points -22%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
954 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5166 Points +30%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4564 Points +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (3987 - 4370, n=4)
4109 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
3989 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
3987 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)
3518 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2408 Points -40%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17329 Points +46%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
12789 Points +8%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12156 Points +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (10620 - 13858, n=4)
12057 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
11879 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
11872 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9812 Points -17%
CrossMark - Overall
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1155 Points +24%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
934 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (834 - 1028, n=4)
927 Points -1%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
911 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
772 Points -17%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
656 Points -30%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9147 Points +46%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
6401 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
6267 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (5821 - 6464, n=4)
6238 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4210 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3965 Points -37%
System
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13141 Points +22%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
10785 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (10428 - 10785, n=4)
10571 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10447 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7279 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
6734 Points -38%
Memory
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
10977 Points +43%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
8362 Points +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (7687 - 8362, n=4)
8118 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
7687 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5328 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet
  (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4874 Points -37%
Graphics
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
25642 Points +104%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
12763 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
12543 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (10876 - 12763, n=4)
12155 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9171 Points -27%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5160 Points -59%
Web
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1893 Points +23%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
1545 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1532 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (1255 - 1582, n=4)
1479 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
1335 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points -18%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13900 Points +34%
Average of class Tablet
  (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11329 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10847 Points +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (10373 - 11155, n=4)
10812 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
10373 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5266 Points -49%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)
7152 Points +672%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1231 Points +33%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
927 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (738 - 927, n=4)
828 Points -11%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
738 Points -20%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
457 Points -51%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1065 Points +175%
Average of class Tablet
  (243 - 1243, n=8, last 2 years)
705 Points +82%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
387 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
376 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (360 - 387, n=3)
374 Points -3%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
243 Points -37%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 5204, n=8, last 2 years)
1683 Points +334%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
981 Points +153%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
388 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
378 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (364 - 388, n=3)
377 Points -3%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
227 Points -41%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (508 - 4998, n=8, last 2 years)
2014 Points +142%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1693 Points +103%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
837 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
832 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (727 - 837, n=3)
799 Points -4%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
508 Points -39%

内置的马龙 910 GPU 解决方案在图形计算方面无法与当前的中端竞争产品相媲美。在我们的测试中，华为平板电脑的图形处理能力与 Adreno 720而不是 Adreno 735的水平。 MagicPad 2.不过，MatePad 12 X 在 3DMark 中的表现要好于 MatePad 11.5 S.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4454 Points +275%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3218 Points +171%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1189 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1018 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
616 Points -48%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4485 Points +264%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3301 Points +168%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1233 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points -19%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
623 Points -49%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12985 Points +188%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4503 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3802 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2236 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4438 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3843 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2148 Points -52%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7196 Points +28%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6219 Points +11%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5612 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4731 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4289 Points -24%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28816 Points +277%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21647 Points +183%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7648 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6584 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4314 Points -44%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17279 Points +140%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13954 Points +94%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7192 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6005 Points -17%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4308 Points -40%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps -15%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
520 fps +88%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
277 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
256 fps -8%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps -64%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +7%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
265 fps +91%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
155 fps +12%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65 fps -53%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +51%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +3%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
200 fps +92%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps +2%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps -59%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +100%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps +5%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -52%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
110 fps +144%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +7%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +163%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps +119%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.9 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +188%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +129%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -4%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +89%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps +79%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
170 fps +158%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +118%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -56%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +220%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps +140%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps -53%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
134.356 Points +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (89.5 - 155.8, n=4)
112.1 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 12 X (Huawei Browswer 15)
111.643 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
108.8 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
108.7 Points -3%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
89.474 Points -20%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
197 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)
115.5 runs/min
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (62.7 - 208, n=3)
112.9 runs/min
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
99.8 runs/min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
62.7 runs/min
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=24, last 2 years)
12.8 runs/min +121%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
11.9 runs/min +105%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (3.11 - 12.5, n=3)
7.14 runs/min +23%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
6.37 runs/min +10%
Huawei MatePad 12 X (Huawei Browswer 15)
5.8 runs/min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
3.11 runs/min -46%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
155 Points +29%
Huawei MatePad 12 X (Huawei Browswer 15)
120 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (85 - 160, n=4)
116 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
107 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)
104.3 Points -13%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
85 Points -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)
45083 Points +19%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
42032 Points +11%
Huawei MatePad 12 X (Huawei Browswer 15)
37829 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (32134 - 46687, n=4)
37658 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
34656 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
32134 Points -15%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3789 ms * -270%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
1263.6 ms * -23%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
1243.7 ms * -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (836 - 1244, n=4)
1076 ms * -5%
Huawei MatePad 12 X (Huawei Browswer 15)
1023.34 ms *
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
842.2 ms * +18%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MatePad 12 XOnePlus Pad 2Honor MagicPad 2Lenovo Tab P12 PaperHuawei MatePad 11.5 SAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
9%
-44%
3%
-15%
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB
1911.9
2003.1
5%
2025.54
6%
894.3
-53%
1837.4
-4%
1749 ?(950 - 2037, n=101)
-9%
1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years)
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB
1672.76
1732.7
4%
2003.53
20%
722.1
-57%
1134.93
-32%
1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101)
-30%
684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years)
-59%
Random Read 4KB
371.52
236.5
-36%
298.27
-20%
237.4
-36%
334.71
-10%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=101)
-23%
189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years)
-49%
Random Write 4KB
313.99
348.6
11%
401.95
28%
225.7
-28%
498.29
59%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=102)
2%
189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years)
-40%
Huawei MatePad 12 XOnePlus Pad 2Honor MagicPad 2Lenovo Tab P12 PaperHuawei MatePad 11.5 SAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
PCMark for Android
-28%
-9%
-48%
4%
-27%
-52%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.
1601 ?(3.0.4061)
1679 ?(3.0.4061)
5%
1726 ?(3.0.4061)
8%
623 ?(3.0.4061)
-61%
1568 ?(3.0.4061)
-2%
1484 ?(720 - 1782, n=20)
-7%
816 ?(127.1 - 2479, n=37, last 2 years)
-49%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.
1562 ?(3.0.4061)
1165 ?(3.0.4061)
-25%
1767 ?(3.0.4061)
13%
581 ?(3.0.4061)
-63%
1181 ?(3.0.4061)
-24%
1200 ?(251 - 1767, n=20)
-23%
593 ?(87.8 - 2205, n=37, last 2 years)
-62%
Storage 2.0 random read int.
53.3 ?(3.0.4061)
36 ?(3.0.4061)
-32%
47.6 ?(3.0.4061)
-11%
37.9 ?(3.0.4061)
-29%
57.4 ?(3.0.4061)
8%
38.6 ?(24.9 - 57.4, n=20)
-28%
31 ?(13 - 63.2, n=37, last 2 years)
-42%
Storage 2.0 random write int.
97.5 ?(3.0.4061)
59.9 ?(3.0.4061)
-39%
73.3 ?(3.0.4061)
-25%
61.2 ?(3.0.4061)
-37%
129.8 ?(3.0.4061)
33%
64.4 ?(36.2 - 129.8, n=20)
-34%
52.8 ?(6.94 - 129.8, n=37, last 2 years)
-46%
Storage 2.0
54852 ?(3.0.4061)
27667 ?(3.0.4061)
-50%
37492 ?(3.0.4061)
-32%
27787 ?(3.0.4061)
-49%
56268 ?(3.0.4061)
3%
31607 ?(13221 - 56268, n=54)
-42%
22217 ?(3215 - 56268, n=48, last 2 years)
-59%

排放 - 华为平板电脑保持凉爽

温度

在日常使用过程中，MatePad 12 X 的外壳几乎不会发热，即使在负载较重的情况下进行燃烧基准测试，温度升高也很适中。我们使用 3DMark 来检查内部散热情况。我们没有注意到性能的下降，因为 Wild Life 压力测试保持非常稳定。

Max. Load
 37.2 °C39.2 °C33.3 °C 
 32.4 °C33.6 °C32.3 °C 
 33.4 °C33 °C33.2 °C 
Maximum: 39.2 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
32.6 °C35.8 °C38.3 °C
31.9 °C33.2 °C33.1 °C
31.2 °C31.6 °C31.3 °C
Maximum: 38.3 °C
Average: 33.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 % -23%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.6 % -26%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad 12 X
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 %
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89.3 % -10%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.8 % -16%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Huawei MatePad 12 X Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.93 (6.92-6.95)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-27.4)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.1 (17.6-19.7)
Huawei MatePad 12 X Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø26.5 (26.5-26.6)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø78.9 (74-96)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.5 (53.4-72.6)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø71.7 (69.5-77.2)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.7 (16.4-17.5)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.2 (22.2-25.5)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.7 (16.4-17.5)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.1 (10.6-12.3)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.85 (7.73-8.06)

发言人

华为平板电脑的一大亮点是它的音频系统，该系统由六个扬声器组成，对于拥有如此轻薄外壳的设备来说，听起来真的很不错。在这方面，MatePad 12 X 是有史以来最好的平板电脑之一，甚至比 iPad Pro 13（2024 年）还要出色。 iPad Pro 13 (2024)在我们的粉红噪声测量中，MatePad 12 X 的中高音频率曲线线性较差。低音也同样出色。

您可以通过 USB-C 端口连接有线耳机，而华为平板电脑仅支持蓝牙 5.2 无线版本。我们无法读出这款中端平板电脑支持的音频编解码器。除 SBC 外，其数据表中只列出了 AAC 和 LDAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.232.82526.826.63123.626.94022.327.25027.535.86320.531.38020.74910019.350.612515.755.716013.669.120016.266.925015.565.331515.166.640010.970.35009.974.963012.172.780014.174.2100014.273.7125012.971.2160014.276.9200012.779.1250012.778.8315013.575.3400013.172.8500013.174.3630013.473.7800012.771.61000013.4721250013.4711600013.161.2SPL25.487.2N0.774.9median 13.4median 72.7Delta1.13.931.835.630.833.725.536.421.536.131.335.728.236.116.53918.850.1165317.965.815.966.315.562.716.366.71470.615.376.515.477.41573.715.280.414.284.51579.914.280.614.27915.578.414.27114.171.315.57414.470.714.170.915.766.714.163.926.990.30.885median 15.2median 71.30.86.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad 12 XHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad 12 X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MatePad 11.5 S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 华为 MatePad 12 X 充电迅速

平板电脑的电池容量为 10,100 毫安时，充电功率高达 66 瓦。使用附带的电源适配器，MatePad 12 X 的能量存储只需 1.5 个多小时即可充满。

其耗电量相对较高，特别是与 MatePad 11.5 S.从负载和闲置之间的微小差异可以看出它在闲置模式下的效率很低。

耗电量

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.14 / 0.43 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.66 / 9.06 / 9.17 Watt
Load midlight 11.9 / 11.97 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MatePad 12 X
10100 mAh		Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh		Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
8800 mAh		Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
19%
44%
21%
36%
Idle Minimum *
4.66
3.6
23%
1.53
67%
3.07 ?(1.53 - 4.66, n=4)
34%
1.851 ?(0.63 - 6.5, n=66, last 2 years)
60%
Idle Average *
9.06
6.52
28%
5.96
34%
7.28 ?(5.96 - 9.06, n=4)
20%
3.82 ?(1 - 9.2, n=66, last 2 years)
58%
Idle Maximum *
9.17
6.54
29%
6.07
34%
7.41 ?(6.07 - 9.17, n=4)
19%
4.38 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=66, last 2 years)
52%
Load Average *
11.9
10.63
11%
6.87
42%
9.55 ?(6.87 - 11.9, n=4)
20%
9.53 ?(2.5 - 44.9, n=66, last 2 years)
20%
Load Maximum *
11.97
11.57
3%
6.88
43%
10.6 ?(6.88 - 12, n=4)
11%
13.3 ?(3.9 - 54.8, n=66, last 2 years)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Huawei MatePad 12 X HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø10.1 (6.11-12)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (2.6-6.9)
Huawei MatePad 12 X HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.81 (5.72-5.86)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.67 (2.64-2.93)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Huawei MatePad 12 X HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.1 (10.6-11.4)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.67 (6.28-6.8)
Huawei MatePad 12 X HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.81 (5.72-5.86)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.67 (2.64-2.93)

运行时间

调整后的显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m²，对于一款 12 英寸平板电脑来说，它的运行时间确实不错，在我们的实际 WLAN 测试中，它的运行时间几乎达到了 17 小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 130)
16h 57min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Huawei MatePad 12 X
10100 mAh
1017 min
OnePlus Pad 2
9510 mAh
866 min
Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh
606 min
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
10200 mAh
692 min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
8800 mAh
831 min

Notebookcheck 总评分

由于平板电脑采用蚀刻表面结构，你不得不接受一些妥协，但由于平板电脑的低反射显示屏和令人愉悦的书写体验，这些妥协似乎是值得的--至少对于那些希望经常在户外使用平板电脑的人来说是这样。

Huawei MatePad 12 X - 10/31/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
87 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
54 / 69 → 78%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 88%
Battery
91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
21 / 65 → 32%
Application Performance
64 / 92 → 69%
AI Performance
25%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
90 / 91 → 99%
Camera
61 / 90 → 67%
Average
59%
83%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
40%
Packaging
0%
Power Use
89.1%
Repairability
25%
Software Updates
39%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 32.2%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 适合大学使用的 12 英寸轻便平板电脑，配备手写笔和磨砂显示屏 - 华为 MatePad 12 X 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-11- 2 (Update: 2024-11- 2)