Notebookcheck Logo

Ayaneo Kun 游戏掌上电脑评测:个人主义者的性能野兽

炙热、强劲、沉重。

Ayaneo Kun 的品质感极强,重量也比其他掌上电脑重得多,但它拥有持久的电池和我们数据库中最强大的 Ryzen 7 7840U。喜欢尝试的人可以在这里通过硬件控制或众多升级选项来发泄情绪。
AMD Gaming Console Zen Zen 4 Radeon

Ayaneo Kun 配备 8.4 英寸显示屏,屏幕对角线略低于 Legion 去.不过,与联想的竞争对手相比,Kun 有一些优势:在我们的数据库中,没有任何一款手持设备拥有如此明亮的屏幕、如此大的电池容量以及如此高的处理器功率。处理器 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U可以在高达 54 瓦的功率下工作。这在许多基准测试中提供了点数提升。不过,我们配备 64 GB 内存和 4 TB NVMe 固态硬盘的顶级设备也有其弱点。尽管如此,这些弱点既不在拇指摇杆或带有霍尔效应传感器的触发器上,也不在其他输入设备上。至于其他手持设备都不具备的薄弱的网络摄像头是否能被视为弱点,也值得商榷。不过,NVMe 固态硬盘过热过快也是一个性能问题。对于至少 1000 欧元的价格来说,Ayaneo 的掌上电脑应该比联想Legion Go 提供更多,后者可能是它的直接竞争对手。

Ayaneo 在最近测试的 Legion Go.Kun仍然是一款经典的掌上电脑,尽管体积异常庞大。其他有趣的竞争者还有 Steam Deck OLED、华硕 ROG Ally、Steam Deck OLED。 华硕 ROG AllyAyaneo Air 1S对于那些想在口袋里装个小得多的设备的人来说,这些都是不错的选择。

Ayaneo Kun
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 8 x 3.3 - 5.1 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-U (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 780M - 6 GB VRAM
Memory
64 GB 
Display
8.40 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 359 PPI, 10-point multi touchscreen, Ayaneo 2K, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB, 3645 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroskop
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22 x 325 x 140
Battery
75 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 0.9 MP Windows Hello
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo
Weight
942 g, Power Supply: 269 g
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
85.2 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
942 g22 mm8.40"2560x1600
84.9 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
845 g41 mm8.80"2560x1600
88.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
443.8 g21 mm5.50"1920x1080
87.5 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
611 g21.22 mm7.00"1920x1080
80.3 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
GPD Win 4
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
607 g28 mm6.00"1920x1080
84 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
One Netbook XPlayer 2
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
864 g23 mm8.40"2560x1600

v (old)
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
669 g49 mm7.00"1280x800

箱子和设备

可用颜色 Ayaneo Kun
可用颜色 Ayaneo Kun

Ayaneo Kun 的外壳几乎全部由塑料制成。我们的测试设备采用金属银色涂装,其他设备则采用黑色或白色涂装,并有一些明显更多彩的点缀。Kun 的整体做工精良,具有很高的抗扭刚性。控制器之间的距离为 2.1 厘米,这款大型手持设备甚至比Legion Go 还要纤薄。不过,Ayaneo 手持设备的重量仅有不到 950 克,在重量方面也保持着不太乐观的记录。在我们的数据库中,没有其他掌上电脑比它更重。Kun 的背面有一个金属支架。有了扩展坞或相应的加密狗,这款功能强大的设备就可以成为桌面的中心。

作为一款游戏设备,Kun 还提供多个 RGB 灯。这些灯光分布在两个拇指杆和 Ayaneo 按钮上。

开箱即用的 Kun 是一款有趣的设备。其包装由木材和丙烯酸玻璃等材料制成。这使得它既优雅又高品质。通过我们在 YouTube 上的开箱演示,您可以了解到这一点:

尺寸比较

325 mm 140 mm 22 mm 942 g299 mm 131 mm 41 mm 845 g310 mm 127 mm 23 mm 864 g280.44 mm 111.2 mm 21.22 mm 611 g220 mm 92 mm 28 mm 607 g224 mm 90 mm 21 mm 443.8 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接、网络摄像头和无线局域网

除了两个配备齐全的 USB-C 端口外,Kun 还提供一个 Type-A 端口。microSD 读卡器被保护在内置支架下。如果你愿意,还可以为这款大型手持设备添加 LTE 调制解调器。主板上有一个相应的接口,SIM 卡插槽也在支架下方。microSD 读卡器和 WLAN 的速度也不错。只有内置网络摄像头的图像质量不佳。不过,这实际上只是用于通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别,而不是用于视频通话。因此,摄像头没有红外滤光片。从下面测试图片中的高色彩偏差就可以看出这一点。电源按钮上的指纹扫描仪也可用于登录 Windows。

USB Type-A、USB Type-C(4.0,带 DisplayPort 和 PowerDelivery)
USB Type-A、USB Type-C(4.0,带 DisplayPort 和 PowerDelivery)
底座下设有 USB Type-C(4.0,带 DisplayPort 和 PowerDelivery)、microSD 读卡器和 SIM 卡插槽
底座下设有 USB Type-C(4.0,带 DisplayPort 和 PowerDelivery)、microSD 读卡器和 SIM 卡插槽
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
146.02 MB/s +10%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
132.46 MB/s
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
132.4 MB/s 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
132 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (20.9 - 184, n=9, last 2 years)
107.9 MB/s -19%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
79.26 MB/s -40%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
63.3 MB/s -52%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
265.8 MB/s +39%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
247.7 MB/s +29%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
191.7 MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (84.6 - 260, n=8, last 2 years)
176.9 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
144.57 MB/s -25%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
92.8 MB/s -52%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
84.62 MB/s -56%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1648 (1587min - 1746max) MBit/s +75%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1584 (802min - 1625max) MBit/s +68%
Lenovo Legion Go
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1561 (1318min - 1673max) MBit/s +65%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (590 - 1675, n=9, last 2 years)
1156 MBit/s +22%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (565 - 1670, n=25)
1086 MBit/s +15%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
944 (876min - 962max) MBit/s
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
867 (134min - 975max) MBit/s -8%
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
669 (485min - 777max) MBit/s -29%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1735 (1708min - 1755max) MBit/s +77%
Lenovo Legion Go
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1711 (862min - 1819max) MBit/s +74%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1597 (1517min - 1621max) MBit/s +63%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (715 - 1711, n=25)
1202 MBit/s +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (715 - 1711, n=9, last 2 years)
1195 MBit/s +22%
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
990 (909min - 1056max) MBit/s +1%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
981 (888min - 1075max) MBit/s
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
947 (931min - 961max) MBit/s -3%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion Go
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1615 (1509min - 1660max) MBit/s 0%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1607 (1530min - 1641max) MBit/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (975 - 1762, n=7, last 2 years)
1404 MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (712 - 1615, n=22)
1338 MBit/s -17%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
975 (796min - 1248max) MBit/s -39%
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
712 (410min - 795max) MBit/s -56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion Go
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1789 (1485min - 1909max) MBit/s +2%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1753 (874min - 1849max) MBit/s
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1672 (839min - 1693max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1383 - 1858, n=7, last 2 years)
1620 MBit/s -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (885 - 1827, n=23)
1478 MBit/s -16%
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
951 (921min - 975max) MBit/s -46%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Ayaneo Kun Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1607 (1530-1641)
Lenovo Legion Go Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1615 (1509-1660)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø975 (796-1248)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø712 (410-795)
Ayaneo Kun Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1723 (874-1849)
Lenovo Legion Go Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1789 (1485-1909)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1643 (839-1693)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (921-975)
Ayaneo Kun Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (876-962)
Lenovo Legion Go Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1561 (1318-1673)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø852 (134-975)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1648 (1587-1746)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø669 (485-777)
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1558 (802-1625)
Ayaneo Kun Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø981 (888-1075)
Lenovo Legion Go Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1682 (862-1819)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø946 (931-961)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1735 (1708-1755)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø990 (909-1056)
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1517-1621)
ColorChecker
15.4 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
18 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
25 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Ayaneo Kun: 17.39 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 27.47 ∆E

维护

拆卸 Ayaneo Kun 并不容易。首先,您必须取下背面的两个手柄盖。此外,还需要取下肩部按键之间的条带--这就露出了需要卸下的螺丝。要访问内部的所有连接,需要卸下更多螺丝并拔掉一些带状电缆。应特别注意指纹传感器的带状电缆。虽然它的长度足以安全地卸下底壳,但很容易因弯曲而损坏。要访问 M.2-2280 NVMe 固态硬盘,必须先卸下 microSD 读卡器和 SIM 卡的连接板。与 Air 1S一样,其中一个螺丝上有保修贴纸,但可以很容易地完全取下。WLAN 模块也可以更换,但安装得更深。风扇和塑料边框也必须取下才能接触到插卡。LTE 调制解调器的连接在我们的案例中没有使用,但可以加装。不过,我们在测试设备中没有看到预装的相应天线。对于较旧的手持设备,Ayaneo 在自己的商店中提供了许多备件。.Ayaneo Kun 的配件也将很快推出。

输入设备

虽然 Kun 是一款非常大的手持设备,但所有按钮、拇指杆和触发器都很容易触及。要在不改变握持方式的情况下操作双圆触摸板则稍显困难。除了 Xbox 手柄上的标准按键外,Kun 还提供了几个可通过 Ayaspace 使用的按键,我们曾在 Ayaneo Air 1S的评测中测试过。手持设备背面有四个额外的按钮,肩部触发器之间有两个按钮。正面还有功能按钮,其中一些可以配置。

与 Steam Deck 类似,Ayaneo Kun 也有两个触摸板,便于在桌面上进行导航,也可在游戏中设置宏和功能。与典型的 Ayaneo 风格一样,制造商在触发器和拇指杆上使用了霍尔效应传感器。这些传感器被认为是无磨损的,因此绝不会出现摇杆漂移。不过,在我们的测试中,两根橡胶铝质拇指杆不仅在外观上给人留下了深刻印象。毫无疑问,它们非常直接,可提供精确的输入,零位附近的死区很小。

背面的按钮
背面的按钮
触摸板和功能按钮是对普通控制器的补充
触摸板和功能按钮是对普通控制器的补充
高清直线电机示意图(来源:Ayaneo)
高清直线电机示意图(来源:Ayaneo)
坤牌 HD 线性电机
坤牌 HD 线性电机

手持设备有时会出现的另一个问题是振动和触觉马达提供的触觉反馈质量。Kun 提供了一种名为 Ayaneo HD 线性电机的技术。这些电机在手持设备中移动的质量相当大,可以产生强烈和明显定向的隆隆声。两个线性电机位于设备外侧,可以直接施力。这意味着,Kun 提供的反馈比 Ayaneo Air 1S联想Legion Go.

显示屏

Ayaneo 宣称,Kun 的屏幕亮度高达 500 cd/m²,100% 的 sRGB 和 90% 的 DisplayP3 色域。Kun 的屏幕显然超过了这一标准。我们测得的亮度高达 700 cd/m²,照度为 91%,并不完美。IPS 面板分辨率为 2,560 × 1,600 像素,非常清晰,响应时间也不错。不过,60 Hz 的刷新率明显低于Legion Go。这意味着在游戏时,这款立式平板显示屏通常必须使用 V-Sync。否则,许多游戏都会出现撕裂现象。在实际使用中,光照不均匀的问题并不明显,但显示屏良好的色彩还原和高对比度却很明显。

690
cd/m²
673
cd/m²
641
cd/m²
704
cd/m²
680
cd/m²
660
cd/m²
706
cd/m²
680
cd/m²
664
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Ayaneo 2K tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 706 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 677.6 cd/m² Minimum: 109 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 684 cd/m²
Contrast: 1360:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.52% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2
Ayaneo Kun
Ayaneo 2K, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Lenovo Legion Go
Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo-OLED, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
GPD Win 4
G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6"
One Netbook XPlayer 2
FLQ8423, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
1280x800, 7"
Display
-1%
6%
-21%
-23%
-14%
Display P3 Coverage
93.52
92.1
-2%
99.85
7%
65.6
-30%
63.1
-33%
75.4
-19%
sRGB Coverage
99.4
99.56
0%
100
1%
92.1
-7%
92
-7%
97
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
91.2
90.09
-1%
99.71
9%
67.9
-26%
64.6
-29%
71.1
-22%
Response Times
-24%
17%
60%
-20%
-47%
-36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
24.2 ?(13.8, 10.4)
20.8 ?(9.4, 11.4)
14%
4.4 ?(2.6, 1.8)
82%
10.5 ?(5, 5.5)
57%
26.8 ?(12.5, 14.3)
-11%
36.8 ?(16.9, 19.9)
-52%
30.1 ?(13.6, 16.5)
-24%
Response Time Black / White *
16.2 ?(7.6, 8.6)
14.4 ?(7, 7.4)
11%
5 ?(2.5, 2.5)
69%
6 ?(2.7, 3.3)
63%
20.9 ?(11.4, 9.5)
-29%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
-41%
14.5 ?(4.8, 9.7)
10%
PWM Frequency
20000
700
-96%
240 ?(300)
-99%
1080 ?(70, 374)
-95%
Screen
-30%
-21%
2%
-28%
-34%
-10%
Brightness middle
680
411
-40%
331
-51%
513
-25%
413.1
-39%
369
-46%
517
-24%
Brightness
678
413
-39%
339
-50%
474
-30%
407
-40%
363
-46%
524
-23%
Brightness Distribution
91
80
-12%
90
-1%
84
-8%
81
-11%
89
-2%
97
7%
Black Level *
0.5
0.42
16%
0.07
86%
0.38
24%
0.39
22%
0.28
44%
0.47
6%
Contrast
1360
979
-28%
4729
248%
1350
-1%
1059
-22%
1318
-3%
1100
-19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4
5.94
-49%
4.76
-19%
3.7
7%
6.97
-74%
7.1
-78%
5.7
-43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9
10.56
-17%
9.2
-2%
8.3
8%
14.11
-57%
10.9
-21%
10.5
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1
2.95
-195%
5.04
-404%
1.24
-24%
2.6
-160%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
9
0.92
90%
8.79
2%
5.1
43%
9.9
-10%
8.3
8%
5.7
37%
Gamma
2 110%
1.93 114%
2.155 102%
2.14 103%
2.04 108%
2.01 109%
2.18 101%
CCT
7188 90%
8064 81%
7571 86%
7732 84%
9571 68%
8838 74%
7733 84%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-18% / -23%
1% / -8%
14% / 6%
-24% / -26%
-32% / -31%
-23% / -17%

* ... smaller is better

我们无法确定游戏设备是否真的需要精确的色彩还原。不过,我们的测量结果表明,使用我们的 ICC 文件(在信息框中)可以将 Ayaneo Kun 值提高到很好的水平,这也适合专业平面设计师使用。

灰度校准
灰度校准
饱和度校准
饱和度校准
已校准的 ColoChecker
已校准的 ColoChecker
灰度原生
灰度原生
原生饱和度
原生饱和度
本地 ColoChecker
本地 ColoChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 8.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.8 ms rise
↘ 10.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 20000 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 20000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 20000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

鲲的背光通过直流调光来调节,但所需电容器的容量似乎不太合适。在 80 % 和 30 % 之间的某些亮度设置下,我们会看到频率约为 20 kHz 的高频闪烁。不过,即使对敏感的人来说,这也不会造成问题。

尽管 Ayaneo Kun 的显示屏非常明亮,但在户外和强光源下,游戏手持设备屏幕的可读性会受到明显影响。在这种情况下,您往往需要利用良好的可视角度来避免反光。

查看角度 Ayaneo Kun
查看角度 Ayaneo Kun
摄影棚灯光下的 Ayaneo Kun
摄影棚灯光下的 Ayaneo Kun

性能

Ayaneo Kun 可配置 16、32 或 64 GB 内存,以及 512 GB 至 4 TB 的大容量存储空间。根据所选配置的不同,并非所有颜色都能提供。配置 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U用于所有配置机型。除了技术上非常相似的 AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme之外,目前几乎所有的游戏手持设备都采用了这种 APU。

 

测试条件

Ayaneo KUN 处理器的 TDP 可设置为 5 至 54 瓦。这将 PL2 提升到一个相对较高的值。如果同时禁用 Ayaspace 中的处理器升压功能,Ryzen 7 7840U 中 CPU 内核的性能仍将限制在 28 瓦。此时,只有 RX 780M 可以发挥最大性能。散热模式也有多种设置,这些设置对系统性能和噪音水平都有很大影响。

在测试中,我们使用 54 瓦的 TDP 和最大冷却模式进行所有基准测试。提高 Ayaneo Kun 性能的一个方法是将风扇开到 100%。否则,在测试中将无法达到风扇的最大转速。

处理器

使用 Cinebench R23 对不同性能水平进行比较
使用 Cinebench R23 对不同性能水平进行比较

最近,我们有几款笔记本电脑配备了 AMD 强大的 Ryzen 7 7840U的笔记本电脑进行了测试。实际上,这款处理器的设计功耗为 28 瓦,没有任何其他设备能像测试设备一样提供如此多的能量。这使得 Ayaneo Kun 在多核性能方面处于比较领域的顶端。相比之下,我们的测试设备在单核基准测试中表现平平。不过,在玩游戏时应使用 CPU 的全部 8 个核心和 16 个线程。

ROG ROG Ally Z1 Extreme联想Legion Go配备了 AMD Z1 Extreme.这款处理器在技术上与鲲中的 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 非常相似,但没有 Ryzen AI。如果比较两款芯片不同性能级别的 CB-R23 多核结果,就会发现 Z1 Extreme 可能更节能一些。我们将在 "游戏 "部分探讨这对游戏掌上电脑主要任务的影响程度。

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2405 (2346.87-2439.02)
Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø1914 (1836.13-2049.71)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1855 (1830.91-1873.89)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme; Turbo: Ø2271 (2104.49-2396.5)
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1487 (1450.64-1776.28)
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1452 (1430.41-1463.22)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
85.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Go -2!
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
80 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
77.3 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
 
74.2 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
72 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
70.6 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
65.1 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2 -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
47.8 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15074 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
14960 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
13004 Points -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (11739 - 15074, n=10)
12884 Points -15%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3984 - 15120, n=11, last 2 years)
12051 Points -20%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11829 Points -22%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10546 (8992.1min - 10546max) Points -30%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
9130 Points -39%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1779 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1733 Points +9%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1721 Points +8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1088 - 1770, n=10, last 2 years)
1647 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (1373 - 1742, n=10)
1646 Points +3%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1597 Points
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1534 Points -4%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
878 Points -45%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5917 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5825 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5109 Points -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (4469 - 5917, n=10)
5039 Points -15%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
4722 Points -20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1521 - 5917, n=9, last 2 years)
4627 Points -22%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
4107 Points -31%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3529 Points -40%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
692 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
672 Points +8%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
669 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (533 - 678, n=10)
644 Points +4%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
622 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (357 - 684, n=9, last 2 years)
605 Points -3%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
602 Points -3%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
341 Points -45%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2439 (2346.87min - 2439.02max) Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2397 (2104.49min - 2396.5max) Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2050 (1836.13min - 2049.71max) Points -16%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (1025 - 2439, n=12)
1946 Points -20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (689 - 2439, n=9, last 2 years)
1881 Points -23%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1874 (1830.91min - 1873.89max) Points -23%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1776 (1450.64min - 1776.28max) Points -27%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1463 (1430.41min - 1463.22max) Points -40%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
280 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
268 Points +9%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
264 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (217 - 272, n=10)
256 Points +4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (176.6 - 268, n=8, last 2 years)
251 Points +2%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
246 Points 0%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
246 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
142.6 Points -42%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
347 Seconds * -67%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
304 Seconds * -46%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
262 Seconds * -26%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (208 - 315, n=7, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * -22%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (208 - 270, n=10)
251 Seconds * -21%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
213 Seconds * -2%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
208 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
62657 MIPS +1%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
62156 MIPS
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
56966 MIPS -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (50087 - 62156, n=10)
55687 MIPS -10%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
53198 MIPS -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19684 - 64454, n=9, last 2 years)
51570 MIPS -17%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
49708 MIPS -20%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
40058 MIPS -36%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6316 MIPS +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (4657 - 6408, n=10)
5816 MIPS +6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5782 MIPS +5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5490 MIPS
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
5472 MIPS 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3653 - 6077, n=8, last 2 years)
5279 MIPS -4%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3398 MIPS -38%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10917 Points +30%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
9803 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
9589 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (7399 - 10558, n=10)
9113 Points +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4457 - 10713, n=10, last 2 years)
8563 Points +2%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8389 Points
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7737 Points -8%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7399 Points -12%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6854 Points -18%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1956 Points +44%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1898 Points +40%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1896 Points +40%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (1355 - 1933, n=10)
1705 Points +26%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1278 - 1917, n=10, last 2 years)
1676 Points +24%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1652 Points +22%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1549 Points +14%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1355 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
926 Points -32%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
18.6 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.4 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
16.3 fps -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (12.5 - 18.7, n=8, last 2 years)
15.8 fps -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (14.4 - 18.6, n=10)
15.7 fps -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
14.6 fps -22%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
12.9 fps -31%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
11.8 fps -37%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
84.9 s * -59%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
53.5 s *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (46.2 - 63.8, n=8, last 2 years)
52.8 s * +1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
52.3 s * +2%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
50.9 s * +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (43.4 - 67.1, n=10)
50.1 s * +6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
48.1 s * +10%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
43 s * +20%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
0.52 sec * -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.4601 - 0.678, n=9, last 2 years)
0.4975 sec * -1%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4945 sec *
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4912 sec * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (0.4559 - 0.581, n=11)
0.4821 sec * +3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4662 sec * +6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4651 sec * +6%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4447 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2439 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
117.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
246 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
622 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5917 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15074 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1597 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
91 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
768 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
97.1 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
89.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
 
81.5 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
80.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
75.8 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
71.3 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
61.7 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
54 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
25901 KRay/s
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
25652 KRay/s -1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
24067 KRay/s -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (17924 - 25901, n=10)
21031 KRay/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
20714 KRay/s -20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (10795 - 25901, n=9, last 2 years)
20307 KRay/s -22%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
18736 KRay/s -28%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
11279 KRay/s -56%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
10902 KRay/s -58%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
109745 Points
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
108496 Points -1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
102584 Points -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (78360 - 109745, n=10)
89071 Points -19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (58068 - 109745, n=9, last 2 years)
87115 Points -21%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
86738 Points -21%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
78607 Points -28%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
72386 Points -34%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
67503 Points -38%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4847 MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4777 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
4420 MB/s -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (3519 - 4847, n=10)
4069 MB/s -16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2707 - 4847, n=9, last 2 years)
3918 MB/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
3854 MB/s -20%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
3691 MB/s -24%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
2485 MB/s -49%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
2296 MB/s -53%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
114294 Points
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
113343 Points -1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
106595 Points -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (83206 - 114294, n=10)
99477 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
95153 Points -17%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (69419 - 114294, n=9, last 2 years)
94473 Points -17%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91289 Points -20%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
86451 Points -24%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
62082 Points -46%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
14822 Points
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
14596 Points -2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
14070 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (11969 - 14822, n=10)
13054 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12936 Points -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8463 - 14822, n=9, last 2 years)
12441 Points -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
12286 Points -17%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
11141 Points -25%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
7753 Points -48%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
58482 Points
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
57426 Points -2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
54962 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (40720 - 58482, n=10)
47352 Points -19%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
46180 Points -21%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (28245 - 58482, n=9, last 2 years)
46040 Points -21%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
41726 Points -29%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
39913 Points -32%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
37417 Points -36%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
166333 MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
165008 MB/s -1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (57678 - 166333, n=9, last 2 years)
108538 MB/s -35%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (53018 - 166333, n=10)
105137 MB/s -37%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
102968 MB/s -38%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
87114 MB/s -48%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76146 MB/s -54%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
65903 MB/s -60%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
57678 MB/s -65%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
1047 MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
958 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
964 MB/s -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (801 - 1047, n=10)
876 MB/s -16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (654 - 1047, n=9, last 2 years)
846 MB/s -19%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
807 MB/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
687 MB/s -34%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
631 MB/s -40%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
554 MB/s -47%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13846 KRay/s
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13765 KRay/s -1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12875 KRay/s -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (9347 - 13846, n=10)
11110 KRay/s -20%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
10740 KRay/s -22%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5732 - 13846, n=9, last 2 years)
10694 KRay/s -23%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
9738 KRay/s -30%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
5926 KRay/s -57%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
5925 KRay/s -57%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
37540 MPixel/s +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (26622 - 49287, n=9, last 2 years)
35035 MPixel/s +15%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
34764 MPixel/s +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (26622 - 38173, n=10)
32058 MPixel/s +5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
30576 MPixel/s
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
29573 MPixel/s -3%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
27090 MPixel/s -11%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
26903 MPixel/s -12%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
26427 MPixel/s -14%

系统性能

尽管处理器性能很高,但在 PCMark 10 基准测试中,Ayaneo Kun 的表现却不尽如人意。这可能是由于内存和 NVMe 固态硬盘的速度有点慢,节流很快。最终,Ayaneo Kun 只能在数字内容创建部分充分展示其性能,因为 CPU 和 GPU 性能在该部分更为重要。

这款游戏掌上电脑可以轻松应对日常任务。即使在玩游戏时,你也不会注意到固态硬盘有时会变慢。只有在复制较大文件时,问题才会很快显现出来。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
6907 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (5866 - 7157, n=10)
6465 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
6439 Points +2%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
6394 Points +1%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6330 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5866 - 7149, n=9, last 2 years)
6319 Points 0%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
5866 Points -7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
5057 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10296 Points +9%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
10205 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
10081 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (9068 - 11081, n=10)
9985 Points +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (9068 - 10633, n=9, last 2 years)
9730 Points +3%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
9483 Points
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
9068 Points -4%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
8480 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10074 Points +25%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
9235 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (7323 - 10099, n=10)
9002 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
8996 Points +11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7323 - 9912, n=9, last 2 years)
8467 Points +5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
8386 Points +4%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8089 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
6089 Points -25%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8975 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
8621 Points -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7204 - 9408, n=9, last 2 years)
8349 Points -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (7204 - 8987, n=10)
8185 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
7990 Points -11%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
7529 Points -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
7204 Points -20%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
6799 Points -24%
PCMark 10 Score
6330 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92447 MB/s +104%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76512 MB/s +69%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (43255 - 70532, n=11)
58370 MB/s +29%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (32617 - 81717, n=10, last 2 years)
58091 MB/s +28%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
51518 MB/s +14%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
49923 MB/s +10%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
45357 MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
45279 MB/s 0%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
43255 MB/s -5%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
55710 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
50337 MB/s +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (37399 - 61602, n=10)
49647 MB/s +3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25380 - 80481, n=9, last 2 years)
49175 MB/s +2%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
48348 MB/s
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
44068 MB/s -9%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
43864 MB/s -9%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
37399 MB/s -23%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
108872 MB/s +117%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92869 MB/s +85%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (49426 - 92289, n=12)
71395 MB/s +43%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25596 - 108872, n=11, last 2 years)
67453 MB/s +35%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
51117 MB/s +2%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
51094 MB/s +2%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
50079 MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49922 MB/s 0%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49426 MB/s -1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49816 MB/s -1%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
134.4 ns *
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.2 ns * +2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.7 ns * +1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112.6 - 139.6, n=10, last 2 years)
127.8 ns * +5%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
123.1 ns * +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (90 - 137.2, n=11)
121.3 ns * +10%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
119.5 ns * +11%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
113.7 ns * +15%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
110.3 ns * +18%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

我们的 DPC 延迟测试包括冲浪、流媒体和使用所有处理器内核的 Prime95 短时间负载。只有在最后一步,Ayaneo Kun 测试中测得的延迟才会增加,以至于 LatencyMon 能识别出潜在的问题。大型手持设备通常不会出现延迟过长的问题。

延迟监控
延迟监控
LatencyMon, 驱动程序
LatencyMon, 驱动程序
YouTube,4K60Hz 测试播放
YouTube,4K60Hz 测试播放
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
744.2 μs *

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

Phison E18 固态硬盘
Phison E18 固态硬盘

Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB NVMe 固态硬盘实际上是一款速度非常快的大容量存储设备,但如果冷却不当,也容易迅速过热。我们在 DiskSPD 循环中也看到了这个问题。仅运行三次后,固态硬盘就会开始节流。因此,读取速度大幅下降--从大约6900 MB/s下降到大约620 MB/s。我们感到惊讶的是,Ayaneo竟然没有使用散热垫来通过金属支架散去固态硬盘的部分废热。

Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
Sequential Read: 5260MB/s
Sequential Write: 4573MB/s
4K Read: 73.2MB/s
4K Write: 218MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1928MB/s
4K-64 Write: 3957MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.029ms
Access Time Write: 0.016ms
Score Read: 2527Points
Score Write: 4632Points
Score Total: 8425Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
73.5 pt
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
70.7 pt
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
 
70.7 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
63.4 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
62.9 pt
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
62.5 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
49.7 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
37.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
4132 (2139.64min - 4132.14max) MB/s +792%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (431 - 5565, n=10, last 2 years)
2840 MB/s +513%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2154 (2143.71min - 2153.78max) MB/s +365%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2119 (2112.04min - 2119.17max) MB/s +358%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
2106 (2093.38min - 2106.19max) MB/s +355%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2024 (2003.2min - 2023.75max) MB/s +337%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
463 (318.56min - 463.17max) MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
431 (334.87min - 430.55max) MB/s -7%
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  (431 - 463, n=2)
447 MB/s -3%
seq write
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3804 (1734.97min - 3803.55max) MB/s +1346%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2757 (2694.69min - 2756.71max) MB/s +948%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2713 (2668.42min - 2712.9max) MB/s +932%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (259 - 5102, n=10, last 2 years)
2298 MB/s +774%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1644 (1600.76min - 1644.1max) MB/s +525%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1524 (244.88min - 1523.68max) MB/s +479%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
263 (255.13min - 262.56max) MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (118.2min - 258.69max) MB/s -2%
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  (259 - 263, n=2)
261 MB/s -1%
seq q8 t1 read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6987 (616.14min - 6987.16max) MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6320 (613min - 6319.71max) MB/s -10%
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  (6320 - 6987, n=2)
6654 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
5068 (4682.73min - 5068.47max) MB/s -27%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2458 - 7005, n=10, last 2 years)
4718 MB/s -32%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
4274 (3828.24min - 4274.42max) MB/s -39%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
3410 (3100.94min - 3410.49max) MB/s -51%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
3212 (2755.45min - 3212.49max) MB/s -54%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2553 (2224.87min - 2553.07max) MB/s -63%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3894 (3354.39min - 3893.57max) MB/s +1403%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2842 (2705.33min - 2842.27max) MB/s +997%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2830 (2802.69min - 2829.69max) MB/s +993%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (256 - 6151, n=10, last 2 years)
2537 MB/s +880%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1790 (1750.28min - 1789.5max) MB/s +591%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1698 (1529.75min - 1697.81max) MB/s +556%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (256.06min - 258.58max) MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
256 (243.34min - 256.39max) MB/s -1%
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  (256 - 259, n=2)
258 MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 read
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
77.5 (77.45min - 77.51max) MB/s +98%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
72.2 (70.46min - 72.23max) MB/s +85%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
68 (67.5min - 67.95max) MB/s +74%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (37.3 - 97.4, n=10, last 2 years)
59.4 MB/s +52%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
43.5 (42.13min - 43.46max) MB/s +11%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
39.1 (33.75min - 39.14max) MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
37.3 (36.41min - 37.3max) MB/s -5%
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  (37.3 - 39.1, n=2)
38.2 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
33.4 (33.02min - 33.38max) MB/s -15%
4k q1 t1 write
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
213 (211.2min - 212.65max) MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
210 (193.2min - 209.71max) MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
202 (192.69min - 202.49max) MB/s +5%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
192.3 (177.32min - 192.31max) MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
164.6 (149.63min - 164.58max) MB/s -14%
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  (164.6 - 192.3, n=2)
178.5 MB/s -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112.3 - 226, n=11, last 2 years)
172 MB/s -11%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
153.8 (152.6min - 153.77max) MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
151.3 (148.2min - 151.25max) MB/s -21%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
113.9 (109.63min - 113.92max) MB/s -41%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1943 (1054.45min - 1942.86max) MB/s +1193%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1647 (1638.92min - 1646.84max) MB/s +996%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1632 (1627.81min - 1632.27max) MB/s +986%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (86 - 4025, n=10, last 2 years)
1299 MB/s +764%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
984 (894.6min - 983.67max) MB/s +555%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
666 (656.44min - 665.61max) MB/s +343%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
150.3 (144.83min - 150.29max) MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
86 (58.25min - 86max) MB/s -43%
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  (86 - 150.3, n=2)
118.2 MB/s -21%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
2871 (1656.3min - 2870.9max) MB/s +996%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1113 (1107.59min - 1113.49max) MB/s +325%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1090 (1080.49min - 1090.38max) MB/s +316%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (89.1 - 2871, n=10, last 2 years)
1003 MB/s +283%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
434 (400.52min - 433.94max) MB/s +66%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
344 (235.14min - 343.5max) MB/s +31%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
262 MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (220.73min - 258.5max) MB/s -1%
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  (259 - 262, n=2)
261 MB/s 0%
AS SSD
Score Total
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8425 Points
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  ()
8425 Points 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2412 - 8425, n=6, last 2 years)
4809 Points -43%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
4326 Points -49%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
4241 Points -50%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3969 Points -53%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3522 Points -58%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2412 Points -71%
Score Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
2527 Points
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  ()
2527 Points 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1881 Points -26%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1859 Points -26%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (842 - 2527, n=6, last 2 years)
1734 Points -31%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1447 Points -43%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1319 Points -48%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
842 Points -67%
Score Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
4632 Points
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  ()
4632 Points 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1161 - 4632, n=6, last 2 years)
2224 Points -52%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1814 Points -61%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1623 Points -65%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1475 Points -68%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1437 Points -69%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1161 Points -75%
Seq Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
5260 MB/s
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  ()
5260 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
4140.35 MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3395 MB/s -35%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (193.2 - 5260, n=7, last 2 years)
3156 MB/s -40%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2972.75 MB/s -43%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2729 MB/s -48%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2183.33 MB/s -58%
Seq Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
4573 MB/s
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  ()
4573 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3282.76 MB/s -28%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2628 MB/s -43%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2598.37 MB/s -43%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (80.9 - 4573, n=7, last 2 years)
2414 MB/s -47%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1602.26 MB/s -65%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1370 MB/s -70%
4K Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
73.2 MB/s
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  ()
73.2 MB/s 0%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
70.67 MB/s -3%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
68.4 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
55.21 MB/s -25%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (34 - 73.2, n=6, last 2 years)
54.2 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
44.6 MB/s -39%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
34.04 MB/s -53%
4K Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
218 MB/s
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  ()
218 MB/s 0%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
177.01 MB/s -19%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
169.1 MB/s -22%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (90.7 - 218, n=6, last 2 years)
157.5 MB/s -28%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
150.68 MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
130 MB/s -40%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
90.74 MB/s -58%
4K-64 Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1928 MB/s
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  ()
1928 MB/s 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1540 MB/s -20%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1490.58 MB/s -23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (590 - 1928, n=6, last 2 years)
1314 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
977.4 MB/s -49%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
935 MB/s -52%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
589.89 MB/s -69%
4K-64 Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
3957 MB/s
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  ()
3957 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (885 - 3957, n=6, last 2 years)
1786 MB/s -55%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1356 MB/s -66%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1335.19 MB/s -66%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1043 MB/s -74%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1000.03 MB/s -75%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
910.02 MB/s -77%
Access Time Read
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
0.151 ms * -421%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
0.122 ms * -321%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.029 - 0.151, n=6, last 2 years)
0.07917 ms * -173%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
0.055 ms * -90%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
0.045 ms * -55%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.036 ms * -24%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
0.029 ms *
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  ()
0.029 ms * -0%
Access Time Write
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
0.289 ms * -1706%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.115 ms * -619%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
0.097 ms * -506%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
0.067 ms * -319%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.016 - 0.067, n=6, last 2 years)
0.0305 ms * -91%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
0.024 ms * -50%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
0.016 ms *
Average Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
  ()
0.016 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
Ayaneo Kun Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB: Ø903 (607.96-6879.08)
Ayaneo Kun Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø866 (612.58-6995.47)
Lenovo Legion Go WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2347 (909.53-4965.43)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB: Ø2546 (2208.3-2562.21)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM: Ø4046 (2891.85-4197.44)
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB: Ø3406 (3167.54-3417.39)
One Netbook XPlayer 2  : Ø3170 (2962.02-3188.81)

图形卡

在 Ayaneo Kun 中,RX 780M 的功耗是所有对比设备中最高的。但实际上,Ayaneo Kun 的领先优势非常小。我们可以再次看到,Ayaneo Kun 的性能略高于 ROG Ally 或Legion Go,但这一优势与处理器更高的功耗并不相符。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
85.1 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M
 
82 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
81.4 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
81.1 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme -1!
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
79.2 pt
GPD Win 4 -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
75.1 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
72.1 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2 -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
66.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13073 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12795 Points -2%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (7868 - 14249, n=56)
12460 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12162 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (10150 - 13828, n=8, last 2 years)
11923 Points -9%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
10671 Points -18%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10261 Points -22%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
9202 Points -30%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
50811 Points +2%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
49862 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (27771 - 53972, n=29)
46628 Points -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (38676 - 50811, n=6, last 2 years)
46039 Points -8%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
38676 Points -22%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8373 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7974 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6683 - 8775, n=11, last 2 years)
7891 Points -6%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7865 Points -6%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (4550 - 8816, n=58)
7747 Points -7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7410 Points -12%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7193 Points -14%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6865 Points -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2913 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2854 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2444 - 3491, n=11, last 2 years)
2853 Points -2%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (1496 - 3196, n=58)
2713 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2646 Points -9%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2622 Points -10%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2419 Points -17%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2303 Points -21%
GPUScore: Sacred Path - 2560x1440 Official
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
117.1 (33min, 99.7P1 - 167.5max) fps +265%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
112.8 (92.4min, 96.8P1 - 174.6max) fps +251%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
28.2 (23.9min, 24.3P1 - 41.9max) fps -12%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
27.5 (19.8min, 20.4P1 - 34.4max) fps -14%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (3.65 - 117.1, n=140)
43.5 fps +36%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3.65 - 117.1, n=19, last 2 years)
36.8 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
32.4 (8.29min, 28.1P1 - 47.2max) fps +1%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
32.1 (15.3min, 26.6P1 - 48.1max) fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
31.5 (26min, 27P1 - 47max) fps -2%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
30.1 (26.5min, 27.1P1 - 39.8max) fps -6%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
30 (26min, 26.9P1 - 41.6max) fps -7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
28.7 (17.9min, 19.1P1 - 43.8max) fps -11%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
28.4 (21.1min, 23.5P1 - 43.3max) fps -12%
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
172658 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35532 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7766 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3232 points
Help

游戏

如果你想利用 Ayaneo Kun 显示屏的全 QHD+ 分辨率玩游戏,你可能不得不忍受低帧率或低画质水平。与 联想Legion Go一样,我们也发现 FullHD 更符合硬件的性能。不过,这个分辨率在 8.4 英寸的小屏幕上完全够用。另外,目前许多游戏都采用了升频技术,这对帧速率有很大的积极影响。

在我们的 Steam 游戏库中,没有一款游戏在掌机上无法运行。大多数游戏甚至在高画质或最高画质设置下都运行得非常流畅。只有《霍格沃茨传奇》和《赛博朋克 2077》例外。不过,这两款游戏都提供了 AMD FSR,可确保在 QHD+ 和高画质设置下实现高达 45 帧的良好帧率。

在某些情况下,AMD Ryzen 7 及其 iGPU 在《鲲》中的高性能表现在测试结果中显而易见。但是,必须明确指出的是,华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 和 AMD Ryzen 7 之间的差异并不明显。 华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 和联想Legion Go 之间的差异并没有大到让人期待 Kun 能带来明显优势的地步。30 瓦的 TDP 设置也完全足以流畅运行所有测试游戏。这降低了功耗,大大提高了电池续航时间。

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
93.8 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
92.2 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
91.8 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
86.6 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
85.5 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
85.2 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
84.3 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
33.9 fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.4 (27min, 28P1) fps -13%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 (24min, 26P1) fps -19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (17.5 - 33.9, n=11, last 2 years)
27.1 fps -20%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.3 (24min, 24P1) fps -22%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.1 (18min, 22P1) fps -32%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
22.8 (21min) fps -33%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 (3.65min, 16.9P1) fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.5 (1.496min, 15.9P1) fps -1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26 (3.2min, 16.4P1) fps -3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.7 (3min, 16.9P1) fps -4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 (7.24min, 13.5P1) fps -6%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.8 (3min, 15.4P1) fps -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.6 - 27.1, n=11, last 2 years)
24.6 fps -8%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.5 (2.34min, 16.7P1) fps -8%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.6 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.7 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.3 fps -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.4 - 30, n=12, last 2 years)
25.7 fps -10%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.4 fps -15%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.9 fps -16%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.9 fps -16%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
49.1 (35.6min, 38.9P1) fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
46.3 (8.7min, 11.5P1) fps -6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45.4 (33.1min, 36.3P1) fps -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30 - 51.6, n=12, last 2 years)
44.1 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
42.6 (7.5min, 9.94P1) fps -13%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
41.5 (29min, 31.8P1) fps -15%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
40.9 (31.9min, 32.9P1) fps -17%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
78.7 (68.6min) fps +32%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
75.5 (67.6min) fps +26%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
67.2 (58.9min) fps +13%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
63.1 (54.8min) fps +6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30.8 - 78.7, n=12, last 2 years)
61.7 fps +3%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
59.7 (52.4min) fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
58.6 (51.9min) fps -2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
57 (50min) fps -5%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33.8 fps +27%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
33.5 fps +25%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
33.5 fps +25%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24.5 - 38.9, n=12, last 2 years)
30.3 fps +13%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.9 fps +12%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
29.1 fps +9%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.5 fps -8%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (53.6 - 80.6, n=21)
66.5 fps +23%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
53.91 (15.95min) fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (40.1 - 53.9, n=3, last 2 years)
49.2 fps -9%
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
 
42.67 (29.02min) fps -21%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29 fps +6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.3 (18.4min) fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.8 (18.7min) fps -9%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.8 - 29.6, n=37)
24.6 fps -10%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
23.84 (18.65min) fps -13%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
23.8 fps -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.8 - 29, n=13, last 2 years)
23.2 fps -15%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
97 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (61 - 109.2, n=14)
93.4 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41 - 104, n=6, last 2 years)
77.7 fps
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
 
54 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
38 fps -10%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (23.4 - 42, n=17)
36.2 fps -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24 - 42, n=9, last 2 years)
35.3 fps -16%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
32 fps -24%
Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:High T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
37.6 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (26.2 - 37.6, n=3, last 2 years)
33.3 fps -11%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (21.9 - 37.6, n=5)
29.3 fps -22%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.2 fps -30%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
24.8 fps -34%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:High T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19.4 - 28, n=3, last 2 years)
24.6 fps -12%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (17.7 - 28, n=5)
22.2 fps -21%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
19.5 fps -30%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
19.4 fps -31%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
22.4 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (14.9 - 22.4, n=3, last 2 years)
19.5 fps -13%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.7 - 22.4, n=5)
17.4 fps -22%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
14.9 fps -33%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
14.8 fps -34%
Horizon Zero Dawn
1920x1080 Favor Quality
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
44 (22min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (36 - 44, n=4)
39.8 fps -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (33 - 44, n=4, last 2 years)
38.8 fps -12%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
37 (12min) fps -16%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
36 (4min) fps -18%
1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
38 (21min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (31 - 38, n=3)
35.3 fps -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (31 - 38, n=3, last 2 years)
35.3 fps -7%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
31 (12min) fps -18%
2560x1440 Ultimate Quality
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24 (15min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (22 - 24, n=3)
23 fps -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (22 - 24, n=3, last 2 years)
23 fps -4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
22 (12min) fps -8%
Ghostwire Tokyo
1920x1080 High Settings
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45.5 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (38.2 - 45.5, n=2, last 2 years)
41.9 fps -8%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (31.3 - 45.5, n=3)
38.3 fps -16%
1920x1080 Highest Settings
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41.2 - 45, n=2, last 2 years)
43.1 fps -4%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (30.4 - 45, n=3)
38.9 fps -14%
2560x1440 Highest Settings
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (22.2 - 26.3, n=2)
24.3 fps -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (22.2 - 26.3, n=2, last 2 years)
24.3 fps -8%
F1 23
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
61.1 (53min, 51P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
57.2 (46min, 35P1) fps -6%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (27.3 - 61.1, n=31)
49.4 fps -19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (27.3 - 61.1, n=9, last 2 years)
49.1 fps -20%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.7 (11min, 32P1) fps -28%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
14.6 (9min, 9P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (6.25 - 14.7, n=22)
11.8 fps -19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6.25 - 14.6, n=7, last 2 years)
11.1 fps -24%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
8.87 (1min, 5P1) fps -39%
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 116.5 132.9 68.4 26.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 43.3 33.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 108.7 90.2 63.8 59.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 79.1 38.5 28.6 21
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 45.7 26.2 24.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 47 45 43 27
Strange Brigade (2018) 158.3 65.6 56.6 49.1 30.9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 43 42 36
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 51 44 38 24
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) 43.7 45.5 45 26.3
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 37.6 28 22.4 16
F1 23 (2023) 95.4 84.4 61.1 14.6 8.22
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 31.4 27.5 26.5
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 43.9 33.9 24.8
F1 24 (2024) 91.5 78.3 57.7 14.5

排放与能源

噪音排放

Ayaneo Kun 的不同冷却模式也确保了不同的背景噪音水平。在静音冷却模式下,风扇会稍微转动一下,但我们的测量麦克风几乎检测不到 25 dB(A)的环境音量变化,即使在 15 厘米的距离上也是如此。平衡模式的最大音量为 35 dB(A),而最大冷却模式的音量也只有 44 dB(A)。如果你想让风扇以 100% 的速度持续运转,则必须忍受约 51 dB(A)的噪音。这相当于最大冷却模式下可感知音量的两倍。

Ayaneo Kun 处理器的性能可以自由调节。这也会增加或减少废热,并最终增加或减少所需的风扇转速。30 瓦的 TDP 值足以满足大多数游戏掌机的需求。因此,其 35 dB(A) 的噪音水平略低于Legion Go。如果您想使用该设备的全部功率,就必须忍受高音量。

Noise Level

Idle
25.31 / 25.31 / 34.5 dB(A)
Load
34.9 / 50.78 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.544.34344.843.52540.135.139.439.540.13142.936.939.840.142.94040.637.339.542.640.65037.536.540.639.937.56327.531.537.831.727.58019.522.732.218.119.510020.222.430.12020.212519.922.530.818.619.916019.22224.517.619.22002124.825.818.92125019.924.828.113.719.931517.524.628.412.117.54001925.630.311.61950017.825.329.611.917.863021.530.23411.921.580022.730.136.211.222.7100022.331.135.811.622.3125019.929.335.311.619.9160024.533.238.711.824.520002434.139.711.824250021.532.838.312.221.531502635.240.912.626400025.333.239.21325.3500021.935.240.313.221.9630021.932.743.913.621.9800017.327.535.813.617.31000016.72633.613.716.71250017.522.933.313.717.51600019.420.329.713.119.4SPL3544.450.82535N1.94.36.90.51.9median 20.2median 27.5median 34median 13median 20.2Delta1.94.84.42.11.923.627.526.225.123.626.628.924.526.326.629.432.928.13529.440.238.728.626.840.241.440.827.424.741.431.836.628.228.131.827.3292420.327.333.436.621.921.333.421.424.117.614.221.421.42117.215.321.420.81815.512.620.821.916.31610.821.922.417.116.811.622.422.216.21510.522.224.416.516.210.124.425.416.515.810.125.426.115.715.711.126.127.115.21411.127.128.113.813.210.728.127.412.312.210.527.426.211.711.610.526.224.711.211.410.924.722.712.11211.122.723.515.314.312.123.523.914.112.911.723.926.612.512.611.726.625.512.312.111.725.522.61211.911.922.616.312.212.111.816.313.3121211.413.337.526.925.523.337.52.50.80.60.42.5median 23.9median 15.2median 14median 11.4median 23.92.43.721.12.423.520.222.425.124.625.522.123.528.924.123.823.122.725.622.924.52625.723.421.323.62520.722.221.322.320.618.218.916.22127.616.818.116.617.32515.217.317.117.120.216.117.216.8162114.515.515.716.121.613.314.315.416.221.713.71414.816.823.81411.814.318.625.614.612.11518.726.513.511.114.519.427.514.310.81520.427.514.410.414.420.229.115.510.115.124.228.922.710.120.218.226.413.810.113.619.62813.910.714.418.326.613.710.814.623.229.412.111.312.315.630.711.711.511.61324.111.911.711.912.518.512.21212.112.218.412.512.112.612.415.512.211.912.112.315.811.911.711.711.816.811.611.211.531.339.227.323.326.61.430.80.50.8median 17.1median 25median 13.7median 11.7median 14.42.63.81.51.21.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAyaneo KunLenovo Legion GoAsus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
Noise
13%
9%
10%
-14%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
25.31
23
9%
24.7
2%
23.3
8%
31.2
-23%
26.1
-3%
Idle Average *
25.31
23
9%
25.2
-0%
23.3
8%
31.2
-23%
31.6
-25%
Idle Maximum *
34.5
25
28%
25.2
27%
27.3
21%
33.5
3%
31.6
8%
Load Average *
34.9
37
-6%
32.1
8%
39.2
-12%
45.5
-30%
35.7
-2%
Load Maximum *
50.78
37
27%
47.1
7%
39.2
23%
49
4%
43.3
15%
off / environment *
23
23
23.3
24
26.1
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
39.2
48.6
43.3

* ... smaller is better

温度

对于游戏手持设备而言,设备的长距离温度是决定设备是否适合游戏的决定性因素。我们的热图像和实际体验表明,至少在关键部位,Kun 仍然保持着令人愉悦的低温。两个控制器和所有按键的温度仅略高于室温。屏幕和主板上方的背面温度明显较高。我们的热像仪显示背面温度为 90 °C,但不得不说,塑料外壳和屏幕的直接表面测量值接近 60 °C。我们怀疑是金属漆刺激了热像仪。K 型热电偶和 Fluke t3000 显示的数值可能更合理。这也证实了主观温度感觉。

闲置状态下的绫音鸥 - 前部
闲置状态下的绫音鸥 - 前部
闲置模式下的 Ayaneo Kun - 返回
闲置模式下的 Ayaneo Kun - 返回
绫野刚压力测试 - 前部
绫野刚压力测试 - 前部
Ayaneo Kun 压力测试 - 封底
Ayaneo Kun 压力测试 - 封底

发言人

测试设备中的两个扬声器提供了不错的音效,甚至可以与较大的笔记本电脑媲美。由于 Kun 的扬声器朝下,因此通常会指向用户。不过,我们的测试设置并不能完全反映手持设备的声音,因为如果需要,Kun 还可以通过振动电机重现低音。这就确保了低音明显更容易被感知。从主观感受上来说,声音要强劲得多。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.848.62539.540.73140.139.14042.636.45039.939.76331.734.78018.127.81002035.912518.635.616017.639.620018.945.525013.746.331512.149.540011.661.750011.964.263011.968.780011.269.7100011.666.4125011.666.4160011.868.1200011.868.7250012.271.9315012.67340001365.3500013.271.6630013.676.2800013.669.71000013.7681250013.765.61600013.160.7SPL2582.4N0.550.8median 13median 66.4Delta2.17.725.125.526.324.83526.426.830.524.72628.128.720.326.721.328.314.231.415.334.812.639.510.842.811.647.310.550.510.153.710.158.611.162.311.162.710.760.810.558.110.558.510.958.311.158.812.165.611.766.711.753.211.751.711.956.911.851.311.440.323.373.10.428.7median 11.4median 53.71.18.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAyaneo KunLenovo Legion Go
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Ayaneo Kun audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Go audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

Ayaneo Kun 随附了一个 100 瓦的 USB-C 电源装置。这也是迫切需要的,因为与明亮的屏幕和强大的处理器一起,这款游戏掌机也有相应的功耗。游戏时最高可达到 90 瓦。如果将 Kun 的 TDP 设置得相应高,那么它的功耗将远高于Legion Go。不过,其他能耗测量结果也表明,Kun 比联想的直接竞争对手更节能,尤其是在中低负载时。

正如在体积和性能基准测试中所指出的,Ayaneo Kun 在配置方面为用户提供了很大的自由度。制造商让用户自己决定何时需要什么样的性能。这同样适用于功耗、表面温度和风扇容量。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 14 / 17.56 / 27 Watt
Load midlight 38.1 / 101 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Ayaneo Kun; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø83.5 (78.6-90.4)
Ayaneo Kun; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø97.4 (55-101)
Ayaneo Kun; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12 (11-16.5)

Power consumption with external monitor

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Ayaneo Kun; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø54.3 (46.8-58.6)
Ayaneo Kun; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø22.1 (18.8-32.7)
Ayaneo Kun; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø42.5 (38.5-47.1)
Ayaneo Kun; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø73.6 (43.5-77.6)
Ayaneo Kun; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø72.7 (57.8-78.8)
Ayaneo Kun; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.1 (10.8-15.9)

电池寿命

Ayaneo Kun 的电池容量为 75 Wh,是同类产品中最大的。如果有人认为这也意味着最长的电池续航时间,那么很遗憾他将会失望。再说一遍,这完全取决于您如何使用这款游戏掌上电脑。如果限制帧数和 TDP,并将屏幕亮度设为较低值,那么在 30 帧的全高清超画质预设下,您可以在一次充电的情况下玩大约 1:41 小时的《Witcher 3 》。在 FSR 和帧率受限的情况下,我们可以玩约两个小时的《霍格沃茨传奇》。在旧版游戏中,有时处理器性能会受到很大限制,TDP 为 9 瓦就足够了。这样也可以玩上四五个小时。不过,如果把所有设置都调到最高,很快就会发现 Ayaneo Kun 电池的电量会在 50 分钟内耗尽。

不过,对于办公应用、网上冲浪和轻度浏览器游戏,电池的续航时间应该会很长。在我们的实际 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中,Ayaneo Kun 在 PC Office 性能计划中取得了超过 10 小时的优异成绩。

Battery Runtime
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
1h 41min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 02min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
8h 12min
Gaming
2h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 50min
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 37.5 Wh
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh
GPD Win 4
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh
One Netbook XPlayer 2
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65.5 Wh
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Battery Runtime
-31%
-18%
-34%
15%
-1%
11%
WiFi v1.3
602
358
-41%
355
-41%
465
-23%
450
-25%
628
4%
Witcher 3 ultra
101
57
-44%
96
-5%
Gaming
122
97
-20%
74
-39%
Load
50
63
26%
77
54%
H.264
185
568
Reader / Idle
581

Pros

+ 最强大的 Ryzen 7 7840U
+ 多种电源控制选项
+ 控制器非常出色的触觉
+ 控制器非常出色
+ 明亮屏幕多彩
+ 硬件升级选项多

Cons

- 固态硬盘过热会降低系统性能
- 电源控制可能非常复杂
- 有时表面温度很高
- 作为一家小制造商,Ayaneo 可能无法提供与大公司同等水平的支持
- 只有 60 Hz 显示屏

判决

Ayaneo Kun 评论。测试设备由制造商提供
Ayaneo Kun 评论。测试设备由制造商提供

根据我们的测试经验,可以很容易地说,与联想Legion Go 相比,Ayaneo Kun 几乎在所有方面都更胜一筹。但遗憾的是,事情并没有那么简单,因为Legion Go 在欧洲的售价为 800 欧元起,而 Ayaneo Kun 至少需要进口 1000 欧元。这意味着还需要支付进口销售税(约 200 欧元)。这就提出了一个问题:400 欧元的附加费在多大程度上是合理的。从好的方面看,Kun 性能极佳,可自由配置,屏幕明亮,控制器出色,电池持久耐用,音质良好。在这些方面,Kun 明显优于Legion Go。此外,鲲的外壳质量高、模块化设计(WLAN 模块、2280 M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘和可能的 LTE 调制解调器)以及更舒适的手感也为其加分不少。不过,联想Legion Go 也有自己的优势,我们将在相应的评测中重点介绍 在相应的评论中.

不过,在纯游戏方面,两款设备的主观差异极小。得益于 144 Hz 显示屏,Legion Go 在这方面的表现甚至可能略胜一筹。客观地说,根据基准测试结果,两款设备的性能也大致相当。如果您购买掌上电脑是为了通过外接显示器上的扩展坞将其用作台式机的替代品,那么 Ayaneo Kun 可能会略胜一筹。除了 I/O 端口略胜一筹外,它在某些应用中的计算能力也更强。

Ayaneo Kun 是一款功能强大、体积庞大、外观漂亮的游戏掌上电脑。但竞争对手的各种设备也很强大。

最后,Ayaneo Kun 推荐给那些喜欢调整硬件而不仅仅是切换性能方案的用户。如果你能掌握绫致空间的各种可能性,就能获得令人难以置信的性能。当然,你也可以调整大型游戏掌上电脑的硬件。与大多数其他掌机相比,业余爱好者应该会更喜欢绫宇坤。我们在 Ayaneo Air 1S.另一方面,如果你想要的只是一款可以玩游戏的设备,那么你可能应该选择 联想Legion Go华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme.虽然这两款设备在维护方面要逊色得多,但它们在性能方面也更容易调整。

价格和供应情况

我们的测试设备配备 64 GB 内存和 4 TB NVMe SSD,从制造商处购买的价格约为 1,700 欧元。可能需要加收进口关税和进口销售税。最便宜的 Kun 配置可在的 Ayaneo 商店购买,价格约为 1,000 欧元。.目前还可以在Indiegogo 上预订,价格约为 900 欧元。.

Ayaneo Kun - 01/22/2024 v7 (old)
Marc Herter

Chassis
86%
Mechanical Inputs
61 / 80 → 77%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
61 / 65 → 94%
Weight
76 / 35-88 → 77%
Battery
88%
Display
83%
Games Performance
80 / 68 → 100%
Application Performance
88 / 76 → 100%
Noise
82 / 91 → 90%
Audio
81 / 85 → 95%
Camera
21%
Average
76%
85%
Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Ayaneo Kun 游戏掌上电脑评测:个人主义者的性能野兽
Marc Herter, 2024-01-27 (Update: 2024-08-15)