联想Legion Go 游戏掌上电脑评测：创意不错，但执行不够完美
AMD Z1 Extreme AMD Z1 Extreme和 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U为游戏手持设备开发领域带来了一股新鲜空气。Valve公司从Steam Deck起步，现在正全力以赴。因此，Legion Go 正在进入一个充满激烈竞争的市场。即便如此，联想还是提供了许多有趣的功能，旨在帮助这款游戏掌上电脑从众多产品中脱颖而出。由于采用了可拆卸控制器，Legion Go 还可以作为平板电脑使用。在此过程中，集成的脚架可保持设备稳定。不过，控制器的 FPS 模式才是真正的主角。FPS 代表第一人称射击。这意味着控制器的右半部分变成了鼠标，而 Windows 键盘的按键则映射到左半部分。据说，这可以唤起桌面游戏的感觉。如果你不想用两个控制器来控制游戏，那么只需将它们切换成鼠标和键盘的使用方式即可。此外，Legion Go 还拥有 144-Hz 高分辨率显示屏。
但在实际使用中，并非所有制造商的尝试都能如愿以偿。许多微小的弱点都可能使其竞争对手的设备看起来更有吸引力。我们最近测试了 Ayaneo Air 1S和 华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme和 OneXPlayer 2也都是非常强大的手持设备。后者还配备了类似于Legion Go 的无线控制器。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.9 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 845 g | 41 mm | 8.80" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 443.8 g | 21 mm | 5.50" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 611 g | 21.22 mm | 7.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 864 g | 23 mm | 8.40" | 2560x1600 | |
v (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |||
| 80.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Aokzoe A1 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 735 g | 21 mm | 8.00" | 1920x1200 |
外壳 -Legion Go 采用黑色塑料外壳
联想Legion Go 的 8.8 英寸显示屏使其成为市场上最大的游戏手持设备之一。左右两半控制器可以拆卸。无论是单独握持还是与平板电脑连接，手感都很不错。不过，它的总重量相当大。855 克的重量可能会让你在玩游戏时感觉有点吃力。如果你面前有一张桌子，就可以把两半控制器都握在手里，这样玩游戏就会感觉轻松多了。
联想在控制器的开/关按钮和拇指杆周围加入了一些 RGB 灯光。用户可以通过Legion Space 调节灯光，还可以选择将其设置为提供设备充电状态或其他状态更新信息。
外壳的各个部件均由黑色塑料制成。只有屏幕由玻璃板保护。如果两个控制器连接正确，就不会出现任何松动，感觉就像从一个模具中铸造出来的一样。平板元件本身也很稳定。使用集成的脚架，可以从不同角度稳固地握住设备。不过，由于脚架仅由薄塑料制成，因此可能会轻微弯曲。因此，我们建议在向外折叠支架时将其放在中间位置。
Legion Go 重约 855 克，比华硕 ROG Ally 或小巧的 Ayaneo Air 1S 重得多。平板电脑本身重 641 克，左侧控制器重 99 克，右侧控制器（不含 FPS 环）重 115 克，含环后重 146 克。供货范围包括一个软壳包装盒，如果手持设备在其中运输，则重量会再增加 400 克。这意味着您总共需要携带 1.3 千克的重量--这还不包括电源。
需要明确的一点是：Legion Go 的屏幕和对比区域是最大的。当然，其可拆卸控制器也会增加一定的重量。
连接性 - 两个配备齐全的 USB-C 端口
两个配备齐全的 USB-C 端口和快速 microSD 卡是大多数游戏手持设备的标准配置，该机型也不例外。不过，Legion Go 少了一个网络摄像头。只有实际使用才能证明各个端口的位置是否理想。我们至少希望 SD 读卡器能受到更多的保护。microSD 卡应更安全地放置在脚架下或有额外的覆盖物。
SD 读卡器
AV Pro V60 microSD 的传输速度高达 280 MB/s。Legion Go 读取存储卡的速度高达 146 MB/s，与同类设备相比非常出色。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (20.9 - 184, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Aokzoe A1 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (84.6 - 260, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
交流
联想的游戏掌上电脑在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中表现非常出色。高传输速度从未出现过任何严重的下降。
配件
Legion Go 安装在一个软壳内，还为右侧控制器的 FPS 环预留了空间。不过，随附的 65 瓦电源无法装入这个大盒子。反过来，当外壳关闭时，充电线可以通过一个孔眼连接到设备上。不过，是否应该在设备装入外壳时为其充电还是个小问题，因为这样做电池可能会发热。
维护
虽然平板电脑的后盖只用六颗螺丝固定，但要取下后盖却要费很大力气。不幸的是，无数的塑料碎片将塑料部件固定在原位，这意味着你必须用几把镐才能将它们撬出来。顺便说一句，你不必拧下脚架就能取下后盖，但这确实让工作变得更容易了。虽然这几乎不值得费力气，因为在内部，你只能更换 M.2-2242 NVMe 固态硬盘--如果你能事先揭开各种粘合剂的话。所有其他组件都是焊接或粘接上去的。
输入设备 - FPS 模式是一个独特的卖点
这款游戏掌机的控制器手感舒适。即使你的手比较小，也能很好地触及所有按钮。肩部按钮、A、B、X 和 Y 按钮以及控制板都有一点阻力，并且有明显的受力点。联想在控制器的两侧顶部各设置了一个功能键。两侧底部各有两个按键，可通过Legion Space 分配功能。Legion Go 的控制器采用霍尔效应操纵杆，不会出现任何磨损迹象。因此，摇杆漂移几乎不可能发生。在游戏时，我们注意到控制器的死区设置得相当大。尤其是在可以设置死区的游戏中，除非进行调整，否则控制器很快就会变得不精确。
联想在两半控制器上都安装了一个功能按钮。这些按钮可以激活Legion Space 或快速设置。此外，通过这两个按钮还可以实现大量的按钮组合。例如截图、打开任务管理器、关闭应用程序以及无线使用时开关控制器。
触摸板和触摸屏
右侧控制器配有一个小型触摸板，可以控制桌面光标。它还可以用来控制某些游戏。在测试时，我们注意到触摸板不提供右键功能。说到底，触摸板似乎有点碍手碍脚，而不是真正让控制光标变得更容易。FPS 模式更适合这种情况。
几乎没有一款 Windows 游戏支持通过触摸屏输入，但在Android 游戏方面却并非如此。如今，这些游戏还可以通过Amazon 应用商店下载到 Windows 设备上。.Legion Go 在这方面真正体现了它的优势，因为它可以实现快速而精确的输入。
无线控制器和 FPS 模式
Legion Go 的两半控制器在取下后会自动连接到平板电脑，不会出现任何明显的延迟。此外，这两个控制器非常轻巧。与连接到平板电脑上相比，单独握持时感觉不太符合人体工程学。这主要是因为手握两个控制器时，手臂会交叉。试用来自Prusa Printables 的 3D 打印适配器后的 3D 打印适配器，大大改善了手感。
与其他游戏掌上电脑相比，Legion Go 在玩第一人称射击游戏时具有相当大的优势。使用 FPS 模式时，右手柄会变成无线鼠标，左手柄则变成键盘的替代品。虽然乍看起来有些奇怪，但 FPS 模式的舒适度还是出乎意料的高。我们发现的最大问题与手感或精确度无关。左控制器最多可容纳 11 个输入键。由于大多数使用 FPS 模式的游戏都是使用鼠标和键盘的传统游戏，因此在分配按键时可能会有点吃力。例如，在玩《赛博朋克 2077》时，您需要为Legion Pro 的 11 个按键分配约 20 项功能。在《CS:Go》中，大约需要 16 个功能键，即使在深受玩家喜爱的《PUBG》游戏中，也需要 12 个功能键。因此，您经常会发现自己不得不将某些功能分配到正确的手柄上，但这只会妨碍您的游戏。可通过Legion Space 选择四个预配置文件。然后，必须在游戏中设置更精确的配置。但这也不是在每款游戏中都有效。
一个真正的问题是 FPS 环与控制器的连接方式。它是通过磁力吸附在控制器上的，在我们的测试中，这导致控制器上出现了一些难看的划痕，因为细小的金属片被卡在了两部分之间。我们只能建议您保持两部分（以及您的桌子）的极度清洁，因为灰尘颗粒可能会夹在两部分之间，从而造成划痕。
显示屏 - 144-Hz QHD+ 显示屏
Legion Go 的 8.8 英寸显示屏具有高达 1600p、10 个触摸点和 144 Hz 的刷新率。联想宣传的最大亮度为 500 cd/m²，而我们测得的最大亮度为 460 cd/m²，亮度分布相当不均匀。与许多其他掌上电脑类似，Legion Go 的屏幕也是垂直的平板电脑屏幕，从左到右刷新，而不是从上到下刷新。在某些停用 V-Sync 或帧缓冲的游戏中，这一点可能会比水平显示屏更明显。
显示器的分辨率可通过Legion Space 或 Windows 在 1200p 和 800p 之间切换。这让要求更高的游戏运行得更加流畅。FullHD+ 分辨率尤其是一个不错的选择，因为即使在最低分辨率下，你也很难在其相对较小的显示屏上分辨出单个像素。
我们注意到的一个很大的负面影响是，在电池模式下，屏幕的刷新率会被锁定。只要你拔下设备的电源插头，它就不会自动切换到 60 Hz 以节省能耗，相反，它根本不允许你更改刷新率。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 444 cd/m²
Contrast: 979:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.95
ΔE Greyscale 0.92 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.09% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.56% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.93
| Lenovo Legion Go Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Ayaneo-OLED, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | One Netbook XPlayer 2 FLQ8423, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Aokzoe A1 BOE0207, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Ayaneo Kun Ayaneo 2K, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | -20% | -14% | -16% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 92.1 | 99.85 8% | 65.6 -29% | 75.4 -18% | 72.3 -21% | 93.52 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.56 | 100 0% | 92.1 -7% | 97 -3% | 92.6 -7% | 99.4 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 90.09 | 99.71 11% | 67.9 -25% | 71.1 -21% | 73.4 -19% | 91.2 1% |
| Response Times | 26% | 54% | -68% | 413% | 909% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 20.8 ? | 4.4 ? 79% | 10.5 ? 50% | 36.8 ? -77% | 28.9 ? -39% | 24.2 ? -16% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 14.4 ? | 5 ? 65% | 6 ? 58% | 22.8 ? -58% | 21.1 ? -47% | 16.2 ? -13% |
| PWM Frequency | 700 | 240 ? -66% | 9970.7 1324% | 20000 2757% | ||
| Screen | -50% | -38% | -84% | -155% | -67% | |
| Brightness middle | 411 | 331 -19% | 513 25% | 369 -10% | 328.4 -20% | 680 65% |
| Brightness | 413 | 339 -18% | 474 15% | 363 -12% | 323 -22% | 678 64% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 90 13% | 84 5% | 89 11% | 92 15% | 91 14% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.07 83% | 0.38 10% | 0.28 33% | 0.39 7% | 0.5 -19% |
| Contrast | 979 | 4729 383% | 1350 38% | 1318 35% | 842 -14% | 1360 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.94 | 4.76 20% | 3.7 38% | 7.1 -20% | 10.17 -71% | 4 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.56 | 9.2 13% | 8.3 21% | 10.9 -3% | 18.14 -72% | 9 15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.95 | 5.04 -71% | 2.6 12% | 1.07 64% | 1 66% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.92 | 8.79 -855% | 5.1 -454% | 8.3 -802% | 12.7 -1280% | 9 -878% |
| Gamma | 1.93 114% | 2.155 102% | 2.14 103% | 2.01 109% | 2.7 81% | 2 110% |
| CCT | 8064 81% | 7571 86% | 7732 84% | 8838 74% | 12502 52% | 7188 90% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-24% | -1% /
-20% | -55% /
-67% | 81% /
-13% | 281% /
142% |
* ... smaller is better
如果您想真实地呈现游戏的精彩，那么屏幕至少应支持 sRGB。Legion Go 的显示屏几乎完全覆盖了这一点，此外，它还提供了良好的 AdobeRGB 和 DisplayP3 覆盖范围。
遗憾的是，我们注意到联想游戏掌上电脑的屏幕在开箱后就出现了轻微的蓝色色调。在应用了我们的 ICC 配置文件后，这种蓝色色调得到了明显改善，其色彩描绘也得到了很好的改善，ΔΕ2000 值低于 3。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 700 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 700 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 700 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
我们测量了屏幕在 144 Hz 和 60 Hz 下的响应时间。两种模式下的数值完全相同。令人遗憾的是，在 144 Hz 时，一个单独的帧的显示时间约为 7 毫秒。因此，Legion Go 的响应时间并没有达到我们的预期，不过对于大多数游戏玩家来说，这已经足够了。
要评估背景光的闪烁有点困难。我们在Legion Go 上测量到了不同亮度下的轻微闪烁。我们无法断言这是否会对敏感用户造成影响。亮度波动保持在个位数百分比范围内。
显示屏的反光表面使得在户外使用手持设备时有些麻烦。不过，由于显示屏亮度高、可视角度大，您往往能找到适合自己的角度。
性能 - 令人印象深刻的图形
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme和 16 GB 内存为这款游戏掌上电脑提供动力。一个 RX 780M也安装在 Z1 中。这是一款功能相对强大的 iGPU，在我们的基准测试中甚至击败了一些 dGPU。因此，您可以在高细节设置和全高清分辨率下以约 60fps 的速度享受当前的许多游戏。
测试条件
联想Legion Go 的 TDP 可以由用户配置，风扇也是如此。我们决定让这款游戏手持设备自己决定如何使用风扇，选择了自动高散热模式。我们还将其最大 TDP 设置为 30 瓦。您可以在Legion Space 和控制中心更改许多设置。我们注意到，Legion Space 还可以做一些改进。通过鼠标和键盘控制程序或使用 FPS 模式会因一些小 bug 而变得更加困难。
处理器
凤凰系列 AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme是 AMD 最强大的笔记本处理器之一。这款处理器针对游戏进行了优化，并在 华硕 ROG Ally也同样出色。与技术上相似的 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U相比，Z1 Extreme 少了人工智能核心 Ryzen AI。尽管如此，Z1 Extreme 的游戏效率应该会更高一些。
在联想Legion Go 中，处理器的供电功率略低于 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme。因此，与 ROG Ally 相比，联想的游戏手持设备大约处于 10% 的劣势。从长远来看，正如 Cinebench 循环所显示的那样，Legion Go 无法在 30 瓦的功率下保持性能。经过几次运行后，它的性能下降到了Ayaneo Air 1S 与 Ryzen 7 7840U 的水平。在我们的测试中，这款手持设备的运行功率为 20 瓦。不过，联想手持设备的处理器性能对于游戏来说还是绰绰有余的，我们进一步的基准测试也证实了这一点。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY -1! | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 -1! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (13004 - 15120, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3984 - 15120, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (1733 - 1779, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1088 - 1770, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (5109 - 5825, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1521 - 5917, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (672 - 692, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (357 - 684, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (2050 - 2397, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (689 - 2439, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (262 - 280, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (176.6 - 268, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (332 - 517, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (365 - 446, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (56966 - 64454, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19684 - 64454, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (9589 - 10917, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4457 - 10713, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (1896 - 1956, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1278 - 1917, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (16.3 - 18.7, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (12.5 - 18.7, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (46.2 - 63.8, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (43 - 52.3, n=3) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.4601 - 0.678, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (0.4447 - 0.4662, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (20714 - 24519, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (10795 - 25901, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (86738 - 103637, n=3) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (58068 - 109745, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (3854 - 4465, n=3) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (2707 - 4847, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (95153 - 107867, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (69419 - 114294, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (12936 - 14281, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (8463 - 14822, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (46180 - 55457, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (28245 - 58482, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (57678 - 166333, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (57678 - 80158, n=3) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (687 - 987, n=3) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (654 - 1047, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (10740 - 13049, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5732 - 13846, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (34764 - 39932, n=3) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (26622 - 49287, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
系统性能
PCMark 10 基准测试主要侧重于办公和创意用途，对于Legion Go 的大多数用户来说应该不会太感兴趣，不过，这些测试还是让我们了解了这款游戏掌上电脑的许多情况。这是因为 PCMark 还测试内存和固态硬盘。很快，我们就发现Legion Go 在内存和固态硬盘方面的优势非常明显。 Ayaneo Kun虽然它可以提供 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U高达 54 瓦。因此，Ayaneo 手持设备本应在这一基准测试中获得更多分数，但 Kun 的固态硬盘很快就会发热，速度也会变慢。它只是在以内容创建为重点的基准测试中表现较好，因为图形性能是最重要的。PCMark 10 的进一步结果表明，Legion Go 和华硕 ROG Ally 的内存和处理器速度相近--它们的得分非常接近。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (6439 - 7149, n=3) | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5866 - 7149, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (10081 - 10633, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (9068 - 10633, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (8996 - 10074, n=3) | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7323 - 9912, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (7990 - 9408, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7204 - 9408, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6439 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (74414 - 92447, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (32617 - 81717, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (50337 - 58713, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25380 - 80481, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (92869 - 108872, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25596 - 108872, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (112.6 - 139.6, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (113.7 - 122.1, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Legion Go 中安装的来自西部数据的小型 NVMe 固态硬盘在我们的 DiskSPD 读取循环中容易迅速过热。过了一会儿，固态硬盘的读取速度明显下降，导致平均值下降。在短时间的负载期间，存储设备可以提供快速的数据访问。不过，Legion Go 并不是唯一容易出现这种情况的设备，Ayaneo Kun 中的固态硬盘也容易过热。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
迚ケ谿オ譎る俣 AMD Radeon 780M被列为最强大的 iGPU 之一，但与此同时，第 第 14 代英特尔弧形 iGPU也能很好地跟上。我们最近对 宏碁 Swift Go 14和 微星威望 16显示了这一点。Legion Go 的 16 GB 内存中有 3 GB 用于图形处理。华硕 ROG Ally 为 RX 780M 预留了 4GB 内存。Ayaneo Kun 和 Air S1 为其 iGPU 预留了标准的 6 GB 内存。根据不同的应用，这与较高的 TDP 值结合在一起，有时会在单个图形基准测试中带来略好或略差的性能。Legion Go 的小内存在只想使用专用 VRAM 的游戏中尤为明显。在联想的掌上电脑中，可以通过 UEFI 设置更改内存分配。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme -1! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY -2! | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 -1! | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11738 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 34005 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7285 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2897 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
首先，我们可以说，我们测试的所有游戏都可以在Legion Go 上运行。不过，如果你想获得流畅的游戏体验，最好还是将分辨率限制在全高清。与其他掌上电脑相比，只有在几款游戏的个别设置上才会出现明显的性能下降偏差。其中包括《古墓丽影》、《GTA V》和《Far Cry 5 》（选择最高设置）。我们估计这与分配给设备 iGPU 的 RAM 容量有关，因为当我们将 Ayaneo Air 1S 的 VRAM 降至 3GB 时，也发现了类似的偏差。因此，我们建议在Legion Go 的 BIOS/UEFI 中进行调整。
即便如此，Legion Go 在单项基准测试中取得的帧率对于全高清来说也是没有问题的，最重要的是，它们毫无疑问是可以玩的。此外，这款掌上电脑还能保持性能稳定，这一点从 Witcher 3fps 图形显示了这一点。另一方面，在玩当前游戏时，你几乎无法使用显示屏的全分辨率。不过，在其 8.8 英寸的屏幕上，你真的无法看出与全高清分辨率的区别。另外，由于采用了 144-Hz 显示屏，Legion Go 不像其他掌上电脑那样容易出现屏幕撕裂现象，但我们仍然建议您在几乎所有游戏中都使用 V-Sync。
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (17.5 - 33.9, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18.6 - 27.1, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18.4 - 30, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30 - 51.6, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30.8 - 78.7, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (21.3 - 52.2, n=45) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (27.5 - 51, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (14.3 - 36, n=47) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (17.5 - 33.9, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Aokzoe A1 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | |
| 1920x1080 Favor Quality | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (36 - 44, n=4) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (33 - 44, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (31 - 38, n=3) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (31 - 38, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (23.4 - 42, n=17) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (24 - 42, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (12 - 37, n=17) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (12 - 37, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (26.5 - 48, n=19) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (27 - 48, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.8 - 29.6, n=37) | |
| Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (13.8 - 29, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 132.3 | 106.7 | 43.3 | 25.1 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 46.4 | 29.4 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 133.2 | 109.2 | 86.1 | 78.7 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 72.7 | 35.7 | 27.3 | 18.8 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.3 | 40.9 | 33.8 | 33.7 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 39 | 36 | 33 | 23 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 151.1 | 63.4 | 51.3 | 42.6 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 40 | 32 | 12 | |||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 41 | 36 | 31 | 22 | ||
| F1 23 (2023) | 57.2 | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 52.1 | 29 |
排放 - 风扇和扬声器指向同一方向
噪音排放
Legion Go 具有多种风扇设置。在测试中，我们选择了 "高冷却 "选项，但在该模式下，风扇没有达到最高转速，因此噪音也没有达到最高水平。即便如此，设备的温度仍然相对舒适。我们注意到，在距离设备 15 厘米处的最大噪音值为 37.5 分贝（A）--这是自动风扇控制处于激活状态时的情况。不过，您也可以手动设置风扇。在播放 Witcher 3 Ultra时，当功率为 100 % 时，我们注意到噪音为 46 dB(A)。同时，Legion Go 从未发出任何高频噪音，只是发出细微的呼呼声。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 25 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 37 / 37 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Legion Go Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM | One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U | Aokzoe A1 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U | Ayaneo Kun Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -1% | -14% | -12% | -18% | |
| off / environment * | 23 | 23 -0% | 23.3 -1% | 26.1 -13% | 23 -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 23 | 24.7 -7% | 23.3 -1% | 26.1 -13% | 23.3 -1% | 25.31 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 23 | 25.2 -10% | 23.3 -1% | 31.6 -37% | 27.1 -18% | 25.31 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25 | 25.2 -1% | 27.3 -9% | 31.6 -26% | 37.3 -49% | 34.5 -38% |
| Load Average * | 37 | 32.1 13% | 39.2 -6% | 35.7 4% | 37.4 -1% | 34.9 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 | 39.2 15% | 43.3 6% | 41.2 10% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 37 | 47.1 -27% | 39.2 -6% | 43.3 -17% | 46.2 -25% | 50.78 -37% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与许多平板电脑和手持设备一样，Legion Go 通过屏幕散发大量热量。在所有测试情况下，可拆卸控制器都保持低温。不过，在闲置模式下，Legion Go 的显示屏已经开始明显发热。实际上，在比较空闲模式和负载模式时，我们几乎没有注意到正面发热量有什么不同。
在压力测试中，我们在位于处理器和散热装置上方的风扇出口附近测得的发热量与闲置模式下的发热量有明显差异。在热图上，处理器的温度为 60 °C，通过风扇出风口照射。背面的最高温度为 40 °C。玩游戏时，手很少靠近设备的热点。
压力测试
经过短暂的提升阶段后，处理器的功耗很快在 25 瓦至 28 瓦之间达到平衡。这一性能在整个过程中保持稳定。使用 3DMark 的Time Spy 基准进行的压力测试也显示，每次运行之间几乎没有变化。
发言人
Legion Go 的扬声器音量并不大，尤其是音质方面还有很多不足之处。高音和低音的回放效果明显减弱。不过，如果不是因为扬声器位于设备顶部，这种情况还是可以忍受的。这样一来，声音就会传到你周围的房间里，而不是直接传到你的耳朵里，此外，它还必须与风扇出风口发出的噪音竞争。
Lenovo Legion Go audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 电池容量小，运行时间短
耗电量
Legion Go 的供货范围包括一个 65 瓦的 USB-C 电源，它拥有所需的全部功率--Legion Go 的最大功耗约为 55 瓦。我们不得不批评这款游戏手持设备在空闲模式下的功耗过高，仅略高于 11 瓦。而大多数笔记本电脑和掌上电脑的耗电量都比它低。其中一个原因可能与Legion Space 有关，它在后台持续运行，同时还负责控制设备的电源，并翻译控制器的功能键和组合键。关闭该应用程序后，Legion Go 所需的能耗会降低 3 到 6 瓦，但手持设备的功能范围也会受到限制。
| Off / Standby | 0 / 0 Watt |
| Idle | 11.5 / 12 / 17.4 Watt |
| Load |
45 / 54 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Aokzoe A1 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, , IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 29% | 13% | 20% | 6% | -49% | 10% | 15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 11.5 | 7.01 39% | 4.2 63% | 7.2 37% | 8.8 23% | 14 -22% | 6.2 ? 46% | 8.14 ? 29% |
| Idle Average * | 12 | 7.91 34% | 6.1 49% | 9.3 22% | 11.3 6% | 17.56 -46% | 8.44 ? 30% | 10.1 ? 16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 17.4 | 12.3 29% | 6.3 64% | 9.7 44% | 11.5 34% | 27 -55% | 10.8 ? 38% | 13.7 ? 21% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 19.66 56% | 56.6 -26% | 33.1 26% | 32.1 29% | 38.1 15% | 56.3 ? -25% | 38.3 ? 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.6 | 38.2 10% | 64.1 -50% | 49.6 -16% | 58.3 -37% | 83.5 -96% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 54 | 50 7% | 67.2 -24% | 50.7 6% | 64.5 -19% | 101 -87% | 75.3 ? -39% | 56.8 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
Legion Go 的小电池仅能容纳约 50 瓦时。手持设备中最大的设备同时也是电池容量最小的设备之一。Ayaneo Kun 和 OneXPlayer 2 的电池尤其强劲。
因此，联想Legion 的续航时间令人失望。这款掌上电脑的电池在冲浪时只能维持 5 个多小时，在玩 Witcher 3 时只能维持 1.5 个小时。我们希望它的续航时间能更长一些，特别是考虑到游戏掌上电脑 的便携性。在游戏过程中，如果您的附近没有电源插座，您可能会感到有些不安。
| Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh | Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 37.5 Wh | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh | One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65.5 Wh | Aokzoe A1 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65 Wh | Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -13% | 30% | 75% | 6% | 47% | 41% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 358 | 355 -1% | 465 30% | 628 75% | 381 6% | 602 68% | 531 ? 48% |
| Gaming | 97 | 74 -24% | 122 26% | 129.2 ? 33% | |||
| H.264 | 185 | 568 | 629 ? | ||||
| Load | 63 | 78 | 50 | 82.6 ? | |||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 57 | 96 | 101 | 86.5 ? | |||
| Reader / Idle | 431 | 861 ? |
Pros
Cons
评价--小瑕疵破坏了整体印象
联想Legion Go 的人体工学和设计令人印象深刻，没有任何 "如果 "和 "但是"。得益于强大的 AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme及其相应的 iGPU，这款掌上电脑显然可以流畅、高质量地玩转当前最流行的游戏。其 FPS 模式和 144-Hz 显示屏为该设备的舒适度加分不少。遗憾的是，我们得出的结论是，联想并没有全力打造一款完美的设备。它最糟糕的问题似乎是电池续航时间太短，而 ROG Ally、Ayaneo Kun 和 OneXPlayer 等尺寸相似的设备的电池容量都要大得多。我们在这款游戏掌上电脑上还发现了许多小问题。其中包括摇摆不定的支架、FPS 圆环容易被刮花、扬声器远离用户以及Legion Space（有时需要很长时间才能启动，导致系统被阻塞或仅仅面临一些小 bug）。
总的来说，这款游戏掌上电脑在性能、耐力和功能方面都没有表现出过人的优势。它的 FPS 模式是这款设备唯一的卖点，但很容易被蓝牙鼠标和键盘所取代，而且最终可能会感觉更符合人体工程学。要想完全通过鼠标和键盘玩游戏，许多游戏需要的按键数量根本无法满足Legion Go 的需求。
在 95% 的时间里，联想Legion Go 都是一款出色的游戏掌上电脑。它的许多小缺点给人的整体印象大打折扣。
现在，掌上电脑市场已经过度饱和。联想面临的一个不利因素是，该厂商进入移动游戏机市场的时间相当晚。从 Steam Deck 开始（现在已经重新发布了 OLED 显示屏），很快就吸引了其他制造商。Ayaneo、OneXPlayer 和 Aokzoe 只是亚洲市场上的几个例子，它们已经积累了多年开发和制造掌上游戏机的经验。作为掌上电脑的后起之秀，联想肯定很难跟上。
单纯就计算能力而言，联想的 Ayaneo Kun和 华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme要强一些。如果您正在寻找特别小巧轻便的产品，那么您可能更喜欢 Ayaneo Air 1S.得益于键盘、输入笔和可拆卸控制器无线发射器等配件，OneXPlayer 2 可以说是您的最佳选择。 OneXPlayer 2和 OneXPlayer 2 Pro与其他手持设备相比，显示出更多的多功能性。对于那些拥有大量 Steam 资料库或与 Linux 相对较好相处的人来说，当然还有 蒸汽甲板.
价格和供应情况
目前，联想Legion Go 可以在亚马逊等主要在线零售商处购买，售价为 699.99 美元。
Lenovo Legion Go
- 01/15/2024 v7 (old)
Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
