Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

微星Claw 8 AI+评测--得益于英特尔Lunar Lake技术的最佳游戏掌上电脑?

巨大进步。

微星新推出的 Claw 8 AI+ 是该厂商首款游戏掌机的重大改进。此外,它还配备了英特尔更高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器、刷新率达 120Hz 的更大 8 英寸显示屏和 VRR,以及 80 瓦时的大电池。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI Arc Handheld Gaming Laptop / Notebook Lunar Lake Thunderbolt Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7 Windows

结论 - MSI Claw 8 AI+ 是最好的游戏掌上电脑之一,但也非常昂贵

微星对其第二代游戏掌上电脑进行了大规模改进,但在原版表现如此糟糕的情况下,这是很有必要的。其低效的流星湖处理器尤其是个问题。不过,由于采用了新的 Claw 8 AI+ 的 Lunar Lake 芯片,这款机型的表现要好得多。这意味着更好的游戏性能(与 ROG Ally X相比)、更低的能耗和更长的运行时间。它的风扇也变得更安静了,但微星真的应该看看它们在持续负载下的波动速度。

在连接性方面,该设备的第二个 USB-C 端口非常受欢迎,其更大的 IPS 屏幕也令人印象深刻,刷新率高达 120 赫兹,并具有 VRR 功能,但其响应时间略逊于前代机型。 前代机型。

微星软件整体运行良好,但有时会有些卡顿,而且其功能范围赶不上华硕的同类产品。这款掌上电脑的能耗曲线也有点尴尬,因为它的人工智能引擎只能提供降低的性能。考虑到它的性能和功能,899.99 美元的价格在我们看来是合理的,但当然也不是什么便宜货。

Pros

+ 良好的游戏性能
+ 120-Hz 显示屏和 VRR
+ 稳定且高质量的机箱
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 超长运行时间
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 32 GB 内存、2 倍雷电 4 和 Wi-Fi 7
+ 可更换的 M.2-2230 固态硬盘
+ 快速 microSD 读卡器

Cons

- 复杂的能量曲线
- 风扇转速在负载情况下波动
- 无网络摄像头
- 微星软件有时略显迟缓

价格和供应情况

微星 Claw 8 AI+ 的售价为 899.99 美元,可通过亚马逊等主要在线零售商购买。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
84.7%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘
Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘
32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $17.49
CDCHGAM Protector Cover Case...
2. $21.99
Hzycwgone Case for MSI Claw ...
3. $17.90
for MSI Claw 8 AI+ A2VM Sili...
List Price: 999€
793 g30 mm8.00"
1920x1200
283 PPI
IPS
2.
84.6%
Asus ROG Ally X
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $599.99
List Price: 899€
685 g36.9 mm7.00"
1920x1080
315 PPI
IPS
3.
68.3%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go ⎘
AMD Radeon 680M ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $9.99
Fhyeugfy for Lenovo Legion G...
2. $64.50
Legion Go USB-C Hub Dock for...
3. $8.99
elitegadget 2 Pack Glass Scr...
List Price: 700€
738 g22.6 mm8.00"
1920x1200
283 PPI
IPS-Grade
4.
88.9% v7 (old)
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU ⎘
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $638.99
List Price: 679€
640 g49 mm7.40"
1280x800
204 PPI
OLED
5.
80.2%
GPD Pocket 4
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘
AMD Radeon 890M ⎘
32 GB Memory
List Price: 1400 USD777 g22.2 mm8.80"
2560x1600
343 PPI
IPS
6.
77.4%
MSI Claw
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $419.99
List Price: 849€
672 g33 mm7.00"
1920x1080
315 PPI
IPS
7.
84.9% v7 (old)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory
Amazon:
List Price: 1017 USD
876 g43 mm8.40"
2560x1600
IPS

微星的 Claw 8 AI+ 是该厂商的第二代游戏掌机,性能大幅提升,但仍使用英特尔处理器。我们的测试设备是售价 899.99 美元的微星 Claw 8 AI+ AV2M-015 版本,配备了 英特尔酷睿 7 258V(Lunar Lake)、32 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘以及刷新率为 120 Hz 和 VRR 的全新 8 英寸 IPS 显示屏。

规格

MSI Claw 8 AI+ (Claw Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V 8 x 2.2 - 4.8 GHz, 37 W PL2 / Short Burst, 30 W PL1 / Sustained, Lunar Lake
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-8533, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
8.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 283 PPI, Capacitive, PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 120 Hz
Storage
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, 512 GB 
, 869 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Lunar Lake SOC - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel BE201 320MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 299 x 126
Battery
80 Wh, 6900 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, 65W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
793 g, Power Supply: 192 g
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳和连接

微星对这款掌上电脑的设计进行了重大改动,除了外壳更大之外,手柄也变成了沙色,看起来非常漂亮。这让该设备看起来更有质感,也使其有别于一般只有黑色的竞争对手。这两款手柄再次采用了 LED 光环。尽管 Claw 8 的外壳较大,但手感很好,我们可以长时间使用而没有任何问题。它的稳定性和制造质量都非常好,我们没有注意到吱吱作响的声音。

机箱背面可以轻松拆卸,必要时可以更换 M.2-2230 固态硬盘和电池。现在还有第二个 Thunderbolt 4 端口可用,设备的快速 microSD 读卡器和 Wi-Fi 7 模块依然存在。它是一款 Copilot+ 设备,但没有安装网络摄像头。它的部分包装可以改装成支架。

ROG Ally X,你会立即发现其 8 英寸显示屏所带来的不同,当然,这款手持设备的整体尺寸也明显更大。此外,Claw 8 的重量比 ROG Ally X 重约 100 克。

微星 Claw 8 AI+(下)与华硕 ROG Ally X(上)
微星 Claw 8 AI+(下)与华硕 ROG Ally X(上)
微星 Claw 8 AI+(左)对比华硕 ROG Ally X(右)
微星 Claw 8 AI+(左)对比华硕 ROG Ally X(右)

尺寸比较

311 mm 135 mm 43 mm 876 g298 mm 117 mm 49 mm 640 g299 mm 126 mm 30 mm 793 g294 mm 117 mm 33 mm 672 g299 mm 127 mm 22.6 mm 738 g280 mm 111 mm 36.9 mm 685 g206.8 mm 144.5 mm 22.2 mm 777 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
连接:音量按钮、3.5 毫米音频、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4(40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery 3.0)、带指纹扫描仪的电源按钮
连接:音量按钮、3.5 毫米音频、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4(40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery 3.0)、带指纹扫描仪的电源按钮
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
201 MB/s
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
184.04 MB/s -8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
121 MB/s -40%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (20.9 - 201, n=14, last 2 years)
114.5 MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro v60)
89.2 MB/s -56%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
85.19 MB/s -58%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
55 MB/s -73%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
32.9 MB/s -84%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro v60)
260.1 MB/s +19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
251.05 MB/s +15%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
218.7 MB/s
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
204.2 MB/s -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (74.7 - 260, n=13, last 2 years)
167.4 MB/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
89.85 MB/s -59%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
74.7 MB/s -66%
Networking
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel BE201 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1663 (min: 1554) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1561 (min: 1517) MBit/s ∼91%
Lenovo Legion Go S
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1783 (min: 1709) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1713 (min: 869) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1890 (min: 1782) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 1672) MBit/s ∼94%
GPD Pocket 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1281 (min: 1157) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1380 (min: 1142) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1224 (min: 1083) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
942 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼51%
Asus ROG Ally X
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1675 (min: 1467) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1686 (min: 1452) MBit/s ∼98%
MSI Claw
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1582 (min: 1462) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1524 (min: 1468) MBit/s ∼89%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Quectel FC66E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
917 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
999 (min: 941) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1762 (min: 1653) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1858 (min: 1771) MBit/s ∼100%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1553 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1405 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1532 (min: 1497) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1397 (min: 1288) MBit/s ∼75%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1663 (1554-1715)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1561 (1517-1595)

可持续性

微星没有提供任何有关该设备可持续性、使用可回收材料或环保证书的信息。该产品的包装主要由纸板制成,可以回收利用。

软件 - MSI Center M

微星中心 M
微星中心 M

在小型触摸屏上使用过 Windows 的人都知道,操作起来有多别扭。因此,制造商提供的软件对用户体验就显得尤为重要。就 Claw 8 而言,与上一代产品一样,它使用的软件是 MSI Center M,启动时会自动打开。这里会显示已安装的游戏,并可访问所有设置。此外,还有一个可定制的快速菜单,可用于随时调整重要设置(如亮度、性能模式、性能监控等)。与旧版本一样,该软件总体上运行良好,但其整体功能范围明显小于 ArmoryCrate SE 软件。 华硕 ROG Ally X上的 ArmoryCrate SE 软件相比,其整体功能范围明显较小,而且偶尔会有点卡顿。

输入设备 - 霍尔效应触发器和摇杆

良好的触发器和摇杆
良好的触发器和摇杆

微星继续为 Claw 8 使用霍尔效应触发器和摇杆,实际效果非常好。特别是触发器的阻力比 Ally X的阻力更大一些,这在玩游戏时感觉更好一些。D-pad 精准且安静,而右侧的常规按键并不显眼。摇杆和触发器的配置选项也可通过微星软件进行设置。当然,手持设备的电容式触摸屏也可用于输入。

显示屏 - 8 英寸 IPS,120 赫兹刷新率和 VRR

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
轻微背光出血
轻微背光出血

微星将手持设备的屏幕尺寸从 7 英寸(16:9)增至 8 英寸(16:10,1,920 x 1,080 像素)。不过,它的基本功能,包括 120Hz 刷新率和 VRR 支持都没有变化。此外,尽管其黑度和对比度自然无法与 OLED 面板相比,但其画质非常出色。虽然没有使用 PWM 闪烁,但其响应时间略微变慢。

通过使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析,我们测得的平均亮度为 524 cd/m²,对比度超过 1,500:1 。不过,这样的亮度是以过冷的色温为代价的,我们注意到画面偏蓝--总的来说,它的出厂校准不是特别好。我们通过自己的校准大大改善了这一问题(我们的配置文件可在右侧免费下载),但这也使其最大亮度降低了约 50 cd/m²。该显示器完全覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间。

518
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
PN8007QB1-2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 533 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 513.9 cd/m² Minimum: 12.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 524 cd/m²
Contrast: 1588:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
72.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
MSI Claw 8 AI+
PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz
Lenovo Legion Go S
LEN91C1, IPS-Grade, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz
GPD Pocket 4
YHB03P24, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz
Asus ROG Ally X
TL070FVXS01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
MSI Claw
TL070FVXS02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
ANX7530 U, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4", 90 Hz
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
FLQ8423-24L0, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4", 60 Hz
Display
-2%
18%
-6%
-5%
25%
14%
Display P3 Coverage
71.1
69.71
-2%
92.7
30%
66.2
-7%
67
-6%
99.6
40%
91.9
29%
sRGB Coverage
98.5
99.02
1%
99.6
1%
93.4
-5%
94.4
-4%
100
2%
99.3
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
72.9
70.34
-4%
90
23%
68.5
-6%
69.4
-5%
96.1
32%
81.6
12%
Response Times
-36%
-17%
61%
59%
51%
-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
23.7 ?(11, 12.7)
30.8 ?(14.6, 16.2)
-30%
27.9 ?(13.4, 14.5)
-18%
9.7 ?(4.4, 5.3)
59%
9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6)
61%
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
62%
25.5 ?(11.5, 25)
-8%
Response Time Black / White *
14.9 ?(7.8, 7.1)
21.2 ?(11.4, 9.8)
-42%
17.2 ?(8.3, 8.9)
-15%
5.7 ?(2.5, 3.2)
62%
6.6 ?(3.1, 3.5)
56%
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
40%
22.73 ?(11.05, 11.67)
-53%
PWM Frequency
360 ?(100)
Screen
-42%
-9%
-1%
4%
143%
-4%
Brightness middle
524
538.8
3%
511.2
-2%
484
-8%
477
-9%
485
-7%
318
-39%
Brightness
514
509
-1%
524
2%
456
-11%
461
-10%
482
-6%
287
-44%
Brightness Distribution
93
93
0%
84
-10%
88
-5%
88
-5%
98
5%
48
-48%
Black Level *
0.33
0.46
-39%
0.4
-21%
0.35
-6%
0.32
3%
0.03
91%
0.1118
66%
Contrast
1588
1171
-26%
1278
-20%
1383
-13%
1491
-6%
16167
918%
2844
79%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.5
7.2
-106%
4.54
-30%
2.9
17%
2.6
26%
2
43%
4.81
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.3
12.5
-71%
8.96
-23%
7.1
3%
5.8
21%
5
32%
6.93
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.3
2.3
-77%
0.95
27%
1.4
-8%
1.5
-15%
1.53
-18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.9
9.5
-61%
6.4
-8%
4.5
24%
3.9
34%
2
66%
6.12
-4%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.44 90%
2.26 97%
2.24 98%
2.17 101%
2 110%
2.003 110%
CCT
7852 83%
9485 69%
8125 80%
7534 86%
7250 90%
6336 103%
7707 84%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-27% / -33%
-3% / -5%
18% / 7%
19% / 10%
73% / 101%
-7% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准
对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.8 ms rise
↘ 7.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
23.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 12.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8527 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在烈日下,由于触摸屏反光,这款手持设备显得有些吃力,但这并不奇怪。其视角稳定性也没有问题。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Lunar Lake 处理器

 
 
 

测试条件

Claw 8 具有三种不同的能量曲线(续航、AI 引擎、手动),默认情况下选择的是AI 引擎。根据使用情况,设备会自动选择最佳的功率参数,但在我们的测试中,它只是保持在 17 瓦。要想获得尽可能高的游戏性能,你必须使用手动模式,然后可以在 8、17 和 30 瓦的 TDP 限制之间进行选择(但只能在 M Center 应用程序中进行选择,而不是快速菜单)。我们在手动模式和 30 瓦功率下进行了以下基准测试和测量。

能源概况
能源概况
调节风扇曲线
调节风扇曲线

处理器 - Core Ultra 7 258V

酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 酷睿至尊 7 258V来自英特尔的 Lunar Lake 系列,拥有 8 个核心,在微星魔爪中的最大功耗为 37/30 瓦。由于核心数量较少,Lunar Lake 芯片的多核性能要弱于老式的 Meteor Lake 芯片和 AMD CPU,但其单核性能比以前更好。即使把 Claw 8 AI+ 当作一台普通电脑使用,其性能也完全可以胜任大多数日常任务。在持续负载的情况下,性能损失微乎其微,我们也没有注意到电池工作性能进一步下降。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1491 (1472.1-1573.87)
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go: Ø852 (844.29-855.16)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø2402 (2245.42-2499.38)
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø2187 (2041.02-2336.18)
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1922 (1902.14-1950.08)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2092 (2081.49-2100.51)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
91.2 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
82.8 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
75.9 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
72.8 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
72.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
 
71.7 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
71 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -6!
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
39.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
34.7 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
16546 (14363.5min - 16546.4max) Points +56%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
15120 Points +43%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14463 Points +36%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13224 Points +25%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3984 - 16841, n=17, last 2 years)
12135 Points +14%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
10599 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (9114 - 11097, n=14)
10387 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
5778 Points -45%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3984 Points -62%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2006 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (1664 - 1947, n=14)
1852 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1825 Points
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1770 Points -3%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1733 Points -5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1731 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1088 - 2006, n=16, last 2 years)
1688 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
1281 Points -30%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6449 Points +58%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5794 Points +42%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5168 Points +26%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4805 Points +17%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1521 - 6577, n=15, last 2 years)
4674 Points +14%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
4092 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (3530 - 4314, n=14)
4031 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
2051 Points -50%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1521 Points -63%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
787 Points +11%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
711 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (643 - 749, n=14)
708 Points 0%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
684 Points -4%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
676 Points -5%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
672 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (357 - 787, n=15, last 2 years)
629 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
390 Points -45%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
357 Points -50%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2499 (2245.42min - 2499.38max) Points +59%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2336 (2041.02min - 2336.18max) Points +48%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2101 (2081.49min - 2100.51max) Points +33%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1950 (1902.14min - 1950.08max) Points +24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (689 - 2533, n=15, last 2 years)
1877 Points +19%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (1504 - 1656, n=14)
1598 Points +2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1574 (1472.1min - 1573.87max) Points
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
855 (844.29min - 855.16max) Points -46%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
689 Points -56%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
304 Points +7%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
285 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (258 - 298, n=14)
284 Points 0%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
264 Points -7%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
262 Points -8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (155.1 - 304, n=14, last 2 years)
254 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
155.1 Points -46%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
588 Seconds * -76%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (315 - 414, n=14)
349 Seconds * -4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
334 Seconds *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (189 - 588, n=13, last 2 years)
281 Seconds * +16%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
246 Seconds * +26%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
241 Seconds * +28%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
214 Seconds * +36%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
192 Seconds * +43%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
66618 MIPS +87%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
64454 MIPS +81%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
56268 MIPS +58%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
53599 MIPS +50%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19684 - 66618, n=14, last 2 years)
50981 MIPS +43%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
35705 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (32198 - 36724, n=14)
35313 MIPS -1%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
23583 MIPS -34%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
19684 MIPS -45%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6143 MIPS +8%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6077 MIPS +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (5265 - 5869, n=14)
5695 MIPS +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5682 MIPS 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
5662 MIPS
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5318 MIPS -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3653 - 6143, n=14, last 2 years)
5316 MIPS -6%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
3675 MIPS -35%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3653 MIPS -35%
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13426 Points +23%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12026 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (9311 - 11334, n=14)
10906 Points 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
10899 Points
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10464 Points -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4587 - 13426, n=16, last 2 years)
9530 Points -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7427 Points -32%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
4966 Points -54%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4587 Points -58%
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2904 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (2593 - 2795, n=14)
2738 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
2716 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2550 Points -6%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2433 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1348 - 2904, n=16, last 2 years)
2305 Points -15%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2243 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
1400 Points -48%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1348 Points -50%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
11975 Points +27%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10713 Points +13%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10076 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (7717 - 9864, n=14)
9494 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
9439 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3932 - 11975, n=16, last 2 years)
8765 Points -7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7743 Points -18%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4457 Points -53%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
3932 Points -58%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2134 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (1891 - 2046, n=14)
1995 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1969 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1917 Points -3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1780 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (875 - 2134, n=16, last 2 years)
1707 Points -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1622 Points -18%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1486 Points -25%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
875 Points -56%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
20.3 fps +55%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.7 fps +43%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15.8 fps +21%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7.07 - 20.8, n=14, last 2 years)
15.4 fps +18%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14.7 fps +12%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
13.1 fps
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (10.5 - 14.2, n=14)
12.6 fps -4%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
7.07 fps -46%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
92.8 s * -126%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
57.8 s * -41%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41.1 - 92.8, n=14, last 2 years)
55.2 s * -34%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
51.4 s * -25%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
49.7 s * -21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (41.1 - 59.3, n=14)
49.6 s * -21%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.2 s * -12%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
41.1 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
0.756 sec * -68%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.4167 - 0.756, n=15, last 2 years)
0.508 sec * -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4795 sec * -7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4665 sec * -4%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4601 sec * -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (0.4457 - 0.4852, n=14)
0.4571 sec * -2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
0.4492 sec *
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
0.4167 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1574 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
167.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
285 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
711 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4092 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10599 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1825 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
120 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
590 Points
Help
Performance Rating
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
89.4 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
89.4 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
84.3 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
73.2 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
57.1 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
53 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
 
51.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
32.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
25805 KRay/s +111%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
24519 KRay/s +101%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
21814 KRay/s +78%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6990 - 26450, n=15, last 2 years)
18926 KRay/s +55%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
12224 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (9215 - 12781, n=14)
11669 KRay/s -5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10795 KRay/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
6990 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
103637 Points +69%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
95655 Points +56%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91595 Points +50%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (42932 - 109745, n=15, last 2 years)
80791 Points +32%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
61266 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (48758 - 63401, n=14)
58418 Points -5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
58068 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
42932 Points -30%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
4475 MB/s +66%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
4465 MB/s +66%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4211 MB/s +56%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1403 - 4847, n=15, last 2 years)
3636 MB/s +35%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
2707 MB/s 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
2696 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (2271 - 2817, n=14)
2621 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
1403 MB/s -48%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
107867 Points +117%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
99496 Points +100%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41744 - 114294, n=15, last 2 years)
82055 Points +65%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
80927 Points +63%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69419 Points +40%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
49750 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (49510 - 49818, n=14)
49700 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
45741 Points -8%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
16640 Points +276%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
14281 Points +223%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13607 Points +208%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4425 - 16980, n=15, last 2 years)
11661 Points +164%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8463 Points +91%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
5002 Points +13%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
4425 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (4103 - 4440, n=14)
4393 Points -1%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
55457 Points +70%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
50357 Points +55%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
48428 Points +49%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (23380 - 58482, n=15, last 2 years)
42674 Points +31%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
32540 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (25361 - 33565, n=14)
30720 Points -6%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
28245 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
23738 Points -27%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
149047 MB/s +288%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (21547 - 166333, n=15, last 2 years)
86298 MB/s +124%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
80158 MB/s +108%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
69125 MB/s +80%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
59882 MB/s +56%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (37728 - 40753, n=14)
38932 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
38453 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
21547 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
1077 MB/s +75%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
987 MB/s +60%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
899 MB/s +46%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (356 - 1112, n=15, last 2 years)
818 MB/s +33%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
796 MB/s +29%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
616 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (499 - 632, n=14)
594 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
356 MB/s -42%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
13665 KRay/s +103%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
13049 KRay/s +94%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
11335 KRay/s +68%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3766 - 14181, n=15, last 2 years)
10004 KRay/s +49%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
6728 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (4891 - 6930, n=14)
6222 KRay/s -8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
5732 KRay/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
3766 KRay/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
54726 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (51323 - 54971, n=14)
53794 MPixel/s -2%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
49287 MPixel/s -10%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
49112 MPixel/s -10%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
39932 MPixel/s -27%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19472 - 54726, n=15, last 2 years)
38064 MPixel/s -30%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
26622 MPixel/s -51%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
19472 MPixel/s -64%

系统性能

由于采用了现代化的组件,Claw 8 AI+ 的响应速度非常快,我们在测试过程中没有遇到任何稳定性问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
7471 Points +2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
7314 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7149 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (6265 - 7314, n=14)
6930 Points -5%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
6504 Points -11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5219 - 7471, n=15, last 2 years)
6429 Points -12%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
5900 Points -19%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
5219 Points -29%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
11262 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
11110 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10633 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (9295 - 11467, n=14)
10380 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8427 - 11262, n=15, last 2 years)
9897 Points -11%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9610 Points -14%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
9247 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
8427 Points -24%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
10031 Points +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9912 Points +4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
9535 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (7357 - 9619, n=14)
8871 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7213 - 10031, n=15, last 2 years)
8585 Points -10%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
8346 Points -12%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
7323 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
7213 Points -24%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
10026 Points
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
10017 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (9333 - 10048, n=14)
9827 Points -2%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9408 Points -6%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9311 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6350 - 10026, n=15, last 2 years)
8520 Points -15%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
8233 Points -18%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
6350 Points -37%
CrossMark / Overall
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1847 Points +7%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1731 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (1590 - 1742, n=13)
1695 Points -2%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1693 Points -2%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1693 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (840 - 1847, n=13, last 2 years)
1466 Points -15%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1340 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
865 Points -50%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
840 Points -51%
CrossMark / Productivity
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1719 Points +3%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1672 Points
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1649 Points -1%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1639 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (1558 - 1684, n=13)
1636 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (874 - 1719, n=13, last 2 years)
1452 Points -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1416 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
878 Points -47%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
874 Points -48%
CrossMark / Creativity
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2077 Points +8%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1919 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (1727 - 1977, n=13)
1915 Points 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1868 Points -3%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1795 Points -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (808 - 2077, n=13, last 2 years)
1547 Points -19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1278 Points -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
891 Points -54%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
808 Points -58%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1610 Points +14%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1538 Points +9%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1411 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1392 Points -1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1309 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (1251 - 1411, n=13)
1308 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (759 - 1610, n=13, last 2 years)
1302 Points -8%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
831 Points -41%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
759 Points -46%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
323 Points +3%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
314 Points
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
304 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (219 - 314, n=12)
279 Points -11%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
276 Points -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (188.4 - 323, n=15, last 2 years)
269 Points -14%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
230 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
225.6 Points -28%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
291 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (199.5 - 291, n=14)
267 Points -8%
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
266 Points -9%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
255 Points -12%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
248 Points -15%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (107 - 291, n=12, last 2 years)
218 Points -25%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
186.4 Points -36%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
107 Points -63%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
895 ms * -87%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (428 - 895, n=15, last 2 years)
576 ms * -20%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
536 ms * -12%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
529 ms * -10%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
518 ms * -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (468 - 559, n=14)
487 ms * -2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
479 ms *
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
428 ms * +11%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7314 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (107682 - 114336, n=14)
108793 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
107929 MB/s
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
89385 MB/s -17%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
81717 MB/s -24%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
74414 MB/s -31%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (32617 - 107929, n=16, last 2 years)
66629 MB/s -38%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
45050 MB/s -58%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
43750 MB/s -59%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
32617 MB/s -70%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
100208 MB/s +14%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
87827 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (82846 - 89417, n=14)
87112 MB/s -1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80481 MB/s -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25380 - 100208, n=15, last 2 years)
59813 MB/s -32%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
58713 MB/s -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
38572 MB/s -56%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
37657 MB/s -57%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25380 MB/s -71%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
117883 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (109734 - 117935, n=14)
116936 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
106998 MB/s -9%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
98820 MB/s -16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25596 - 117883, n=17, last 2 years)
75657 MB/s -36%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75350 MB/s -36%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49797 MB/s -58%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
48811 MB/s -59%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25596 MB/s -78%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
139.6 ns * -40%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.3 ns * -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
129.3 ns * -30%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (99.8 - 147.6, n=16, last 2 years)
124.5 ns * -25%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
122.1 ns * -22%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
112.6 ns * -13%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
105.5 ns * -6%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
99.8 ns *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (95 - 101.1, n=14)
97.3 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在延迟测试中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备没有显示出任何限制。有一个驱动程序确实有点故障,但重要的中断到进程延迟值非常低。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2293.5 μs * -370%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1486.6 μs * -205%
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1435.6 μs * -194%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
995 μs * -104%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
487.7 μs *
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
471.3 μs * +3%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

M.2-2230 固态硬盘
M.2-2230 固态硬盘

微星安装了一块来自 Kioxia 的紧凑型 1TB M.2-2230 SSD(首次启动后可用容量为 869 GB),可以顺利更换。在我们的测试中,PCIe 4.0 SSD 的传输速率非常好,而且完全保持稳定。

Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5147 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5085 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 854 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 578 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 155.2 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1638 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2284 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 -11!
 
90.7 pt
GPD Pocket 4
 
80.3 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
71.4 pt
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
 
68.3 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
65.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
61.7 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
61.3 pt
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
60.4 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -11!
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
44.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
5565 (3733.98min - 5564.79max) MB/s +77%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
4421 (4398.57min - 4420.59max) MB/s +41%
GPD Pocket 4
 
3543 (3463.87min - 3542.51max) MB/s +13%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
3141 (3077.71min - 3140.5max) MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (431 - 5565, n=16, last 2 years)
2900 MB/s -8%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2878 (2833.46min - 2878.46max) MB/s -8%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (2546 - 3141, n=2)
2844 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2693 (2674.18min - 2692.74max) MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
2569 (2495.19min - 2569.22max) MB/s -18%
seq write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
5102 (4976.45min - 5101.6max) MB/s +19%
GPD Pocket 4
 
4625 (3480.81min - 4624.62max) MB/s +8%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
4301 (4221.3min - 4301.05max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (3047 - 4301, n=2)
3674 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
3185 (1268.34min - 3185.29max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (259 - 5102, n=16, last 2 years)
2865 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2768 (2498.37min - 2767.74max) MB/s -36%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2758 (2188.17min - 2758.38max) MB/s -36%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1056 (164.42min - 1056.34max) MB/s -75%
seq q8 t1 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
7005 (6255.88min - 7004.74max) MB/s +22%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
6440 (5527.73min - 6439.51max) MB/s +12%
GPD Pocket 4
 
6355 (5605.9min - 6355.08max) MB/s +11%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
5739 (4997.3min - 5739.33max) MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2458 - 7005, n=16, last 2 years)
5024 MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4952 (4163.75min - 4951.75max) MB/s -14%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (4075 - 5739, n=2)
4907 MB/s -14%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
3760 (2910.85min - 3760.19max) MB/s -34%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2458 (2277.98min - 2458.28max) MB/s -57%
seq q8 t1 write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
6151 (6074.61min - 6150.81max) MB/s +17%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
5252 (5232min - 5251.88max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (4639 - 5252, n=2)
4946 MB/s -6%
GPD Pocket 4
 
4867 (4538.6min - 4867.19max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
4568 (1284.66min - 4568.32max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (256 - 6151, n=16, last 2 years)
3272 MB/s -38%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3033 (2657.93min - 3033.11max) MB/s -42%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2871 (2238.71min - 2871max) MB/s -45%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1088 (990.07min - 1088.21max) MB/s -79%
4k q1 t1 read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
97.4 (60.76min - 97.44max) MB/s +88%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
68 (66.96min - 68max) MB/s +31%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
64.2 (61.66min - 64.21max) MB/s +24%
GPD Pocket 4
 
59 (58.74min - 58.95max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (37.3 - 97.4, n=16, last 2 years)
58.8 MB/s +13%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
51.9 (48.63min - 51.87max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (51.5 - 51.9, n=2)
51.7 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
51.5 (50.22min - 51.53max) MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
46.1 (44.66min - 46.06max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 write
GPD Pocket 4
 
227 (220.18min - 227.04max) MB/s +30%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
226 (185.56min - 226.08max) MB/s +29%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
181.4 (169.88min - 181.36max) MB/s +4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112 - 262, n=17, last 2 years)
177.7 MB/s +2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
174.9 (155.08min - 174.93max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (161.8 - 174.9, n=2)
168.4 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
140.9 (139.71min - 140.94max) MB/s -19%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
112.3 (81.5min - 112.29max) MB/s -36%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
112 (100.07min - 111.98max) MB/s -36%
4k q32 t16 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
4025 (4006.61min - 4024.99max) MB/s +43%
GPD Pocket 4
 
3497 (1357.47min - 3497.01max) MB/s +24%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
2811 (2783.79min - 2810.81max) MB/s
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2148 (2142.5min - 2147.8max) MB/s -24%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (1091 - 2811, n=2)
1951 MB/s -31%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1893 (1813.54min - 1893.35max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (86 - 4025, n=16, last 2 years)
1791 MB/s -36%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1106 (1031.05min - 1105.71max) MB/s -61%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
407 (296.91min - 406.67max) MB/s -86%
4k q32 t16 write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
2452 (2245.51min - 2452.41max) MB/s +43%
GPD Pocket 4
 
1720 (1666.75min - 1720.14max) MB/s 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1714 (1195.48min - 1713.63max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1222 (1181.65min - 1222.42max) MB/s -29%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (89.1 - 3088, n=16, last 2 years)
1216 MB/s -29%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (474 - 1714, n=2)
1094 MB/s -36%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
542 (404.55min - 542.06max) MB/s -68%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
447 (437.78min - 446.91max) MB/s -74%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
89.1 (82.16min - 89.09max) MB/s -95%
AS SSD
Score Total
GPD Pocket 4
 
6318 Points +18%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (5356 - 5371, n=2)
5364 Points 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
5356 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2412 - 8425, n=11, last 2 years)
5339 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
4941 Points -8%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4711 Points -12%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
4480 Points -16%
Score Read
GPD Pocket 4
 
2849 Points +27%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
2252 Points
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
2231 Points -1%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2189 Points -3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (842 - 2849, n=11, last 2 years)
2065 Points -8%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (1512 - 2252, n=2)
1882 Points -16%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1315 Points -42%
Score Write
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2787 Points +41%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (1976 - 3160, n=2)
2568 Points +30%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1161 - 4632, n=11, last 2 years)
2165 Points +10%
GPD Pocket 4
 
2054 Points +4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1976 Points
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1704 Points -14%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1225 Points -38%
Seq Read
GPD Pocket 4
 
5293.31 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
5107.56 MB/s +4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
4909 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (4885 - 4909, n=2)
4897 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (193.2 - 5643, n=12, last 2 years)
3832 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3524 MB/s -28%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2601 MB/s -47%
Seq Write
GPD Pocket 4
 
4532.38 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
4479 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (3225 - 4479, n=2)
3852 MB/s -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (80.9 - 5416, n=12, last 2 years)
3020 MB/s -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
2264.42 MB/s -49%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2084 MB/s -53%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1397 MB/s -69%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
66.86 MB/s +45%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
64.6 MB/s +40%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (34 - 82.8, n=11, last 2 years)
58.9 MB/s +28%
GPD Pocket 4
 
58.86 MB/s +28%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (46.1 - 50.7, n=2)
48.4 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.5 MB/s +3%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
46.1 MB/s
4K Write
GPD Pocket 4
 
200.12 MB/s +48%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
200 MB/s +48%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (135.5 - 202, n=2)
168.8 MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
167.9 MB/s +24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (90.7 - 218, n=11, last 2 years)
158.4 MB/s +17%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
135.5 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
106.87 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Read
GPD Pocket 4
 
2260.35 MB/s +32%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1864 MB/s +9%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1715 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1653.06 MB/s -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (590 - 2260, n=11, last 2 years)
1590 MB/s -7%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (973 - 1715, n=2)
1344 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
915 MB/s -47%
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2411 MB/s +73%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (1392 - 2636, n=2)
2014 MB/s +45%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (885 - 3957, n=11, last 2 years)
1768 MB/s +27%
GPD Pocket 4
 
1400.18 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1392 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1370.24 MB/s -2%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
885 MB/s -36%
Access Time Read
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
0.142 ms * -468%
GPD Pocket 4
 
0.082 ms * -228%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.025 - 0.151, n=11, last 2 years)
0.082 ms * -228%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.068 ms * -172%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.03 ms * -20%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
0.025 ms *
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (0.024 - 0.025, n=2)
0.0245 ms * +2%
Access Time Write
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
0.084 ms *
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
  (0.082 - 0.084, n=2)
0.083 ms * +1%
GPD Pocket 4
 
0.065 ms * +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.016 - 0.084, n=11, last 2 years)
0.04055 ms * +52%
Lenovo Legion Go S
SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
0.037 ms * +56%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.022 ms * +74%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.021 ms * +75%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

02955908851180147517702065236026552950324535403835413044254720501553105605Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5845 (5515.38-5873.91)

图形卡

英特尔 英特尔 Arc Graphics 140VClaw 8 的图形性能非常出色,在合成基准测试中名列我们对比组的前茅。不过,游戏性能当然更为重要,Lunar Lake 处理器在这方面的表现也非常出色。在我们的标准测试中,Claw 8 的表现仅次于价格更高的 GDP Pocket,但旧的 被超越了 25%,而 ROG Ally X领先约 10%。在我们的测试中,《GTA V》在启动时不断崩溃,因此我们无法在此提供任何结果。除此之外,没有任何问题。无论是在长时间游戏还是在电池供电的情况下,它的游戏性能都完全稳定。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
93.9 pt
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
 
91.5 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
88.5 pt
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
87.1 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
86.5 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
79.6 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
78.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
58 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
13828 Points +22%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13267 Points +17%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12205 Points +8%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
12043 Points +6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8360 - 13828, n=13, last 2 years)
11914 Points +5%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
11316 Points
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (10499 - 12772, n=20)
11315 Points 0%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
9971 Points
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (6790 - 10476, n=21)
9602 Points -4%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
8775 Points -12%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8618 Points -14%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
8540 Points -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6580 - 9971, n=17, last 2 years)
8028 Points -19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7971 Points -20%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
6580 Points -34%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
4118 Points
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (2955 - 4415, n=24)
3972 Points -4%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3491 Points -15%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3286 Points -20%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3196 Points -22%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2058 - 4118, n=17, last 2 years)
2970 Points -28%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2866 Points -30%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
2058 Points -50%
3DMark 11 Performance
11827 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9075 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4448 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
812 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
3289 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
3267 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
980 Seconds * -79%
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (509 - 700, n=19)
579 Seconds * -6%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
546 Seconds *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (290 - 980, n=15, last 2 years)
454 Seconds * +17%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
437 Seconds * +20%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
385 Seconds * +29%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
365 Seconds * +33%
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
304 Seconds * +44%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
327 Seconds *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (n=1last 2 years)
327 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
98 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
93.2 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
83.9 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
75.3 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
74.5 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
73.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
59 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -4!
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
53.5 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
28.5 (23.4min) fps
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
26.6 (22.1min) fps -7%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
22.9 (19.3min) fps -20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (11.5 - 28.5, n=13, last 2 years)
20.4 fps -28%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
19.8 (16.6min) fps -31%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
13.8 (11.7min, 10.2P1) fps -52%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
29.1 fps +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
28.7 fps
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.8 fps -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.5 - 29.1, n=14, last 2 years)
23 fps -20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.3 fps -29%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
18.1 fps -37%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
34.4 fps
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
32.5 fps -6%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
30 fps -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.3 fps -18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.4 - 34.4, n=18, last 2 years)
26.6 fps -23%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.4 fps -26%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
19.9 fps -42%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
18.4 fps -47%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
56.1 (18min, 29.5P1) fps
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
56.1 (42.7min, 45.4P1) fps 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
51.6 (35.6min, 40.1P1) fps -8%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
48.6 (29.1min, 38.3P1) fps -13%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46 fps -18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30 - 56.1, n=18, last 2 years)
45.7 fps -19%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
35.9 (10min, 11.8P1) fps -36%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
30 fps -47%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
85 (75.3min) fps +3%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
82.2 (57.3min) fps
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
76.2 (68.4min) fps -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30.8 - 85, n=18, last 2 years)
66.1 fps -20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
63.6 (41.1min) fps -23%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
60.4 (54.6min) fps -27%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
58.7 (50.9min) fps -29%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
50.5 fps +57%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
38.9 fps +21%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33.2 fps +3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24.5 - 50.5, n=18, last 2 years)
32.6 fps +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
32.2 fps
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.6 fps -14%
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
26.5 fps -18%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

0510152025Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V: Ø25.3 (23.7-26.2)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 0 game wont start
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 100.7 94 84.1 82.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 87.6 87.6 34.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 43.3 36.5 32.2
Strange Brigade (2018) 227 81.7 67.9 56.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 40.4 33.5 29.2 28.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 46.8 37.4 31.4 28.5
F1 24 (2024) 85.7 76.2 59.5 20.1
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) 18

排放与能源

噪音排放

两个风扇
两个风扇

手持设备的两个风扇启动相当快,尤其是在功率最大的模式下,但在游戏过程中,风扇的波动行为更令人担忧。在 30 瓦的手动模式下,该设备的噪音在 37.3-41.4 dB(A) 之间变化,尽管其 TDP 绝对不变。我们在AI模式(37/17 瓦)下也观察到了这种情况,但噪音范围在 33.4-37.3 dB(A)之间。测试期间,测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
24.7 / 24.7 / 28.9 dB(A)
Load
37.3 / 41.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.740.646.341.940.42532.133.333.329.933.23129.628.231.428.929.64037.332.939.836.938.4503228.833.331.333.16328.227.927.926.336.78021.822.322.82626.110024.520.621.623.322.812524.121.419.3202416020.419.918.417.423.220022.220.419.318.523.625023.922.42220.525.631524.120.619.6162640023.920.616.913.526.950025.621.618.912.229.863027.623.91811.429.880027.323.819.410.934100027.523.518.610.931.1125028.424.218.711.632.2160029.126.420.911.132.7200027.923.314.511.530.8250023.817.513.41230.8315022.317.313.612.227.8400019.615.213.112.624.150001814.31312.723.2630015.613.813.212.819.6800014.113.513.212.816.1100001413.813.21314.71250013.913.813.212.914.21600013.813.812.712.313SPL37.333.428.924.741.4N2.41.71.10.63.5median 23.9median 20.6median 18median 12.7median 25.6Delta5.34.53.62.45.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Claw 8 AI+
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
Lenovo Legion Go S
Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
GPD Pocket 4
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
Noise
-5%
-7%
-3%
-9%
5%
1%
off / environment *
24.7
25.6
-4%
22.8
8%
24.7
-0%
25.7
-4%
24.7
-0%
24.4
1%
Idle Minimum *
24.7
25.6
-4%
25.8
-4%
24.7
-0%
25.7
-4%
25
-1%
24.4
1%
Idle Average *
24.7
25.6
-4%
25.8
-4%
24.7
-0%
31.7
-28%
25
-1%
24.4
1%
Idle Maximum *
28.9
28.37
2%
31
-7%
28.5
1%
31.7
-10%
25
13%
30.6
-6%
Load Average *
37.3
47
-26%
42.6
-14%
36.6
2%
31.3
16%
36
3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
41.4
43.1
-4%
43.3
-5%
42.6
-3%
45.5
-10%
Load Maximum *
41.4
48.5
-17%
45.1
-9%
42.6
-3%
45.5
-10%
40.8
1%
39.3
5%

* ... smaller is better

温度

其表面温度总体很低,尤其是手持设备的手柄几乎不会发热。热空气从设备顶部排出。在压力测试期间,各 TDP 值保持不变。

CPU/iGPU 数据压力测试(红色:手动/30 瓦,绿色:人工智能引擎)
CPU/iGPU 数据压力测试(红色:手动/30 瓦,绿色:人工智能引擎)
Max. Load
 36.6 °C35 °C34.7 °C 
 35.7 °C34.9 °C34.6 °C 
 35 °C35.3 °C33.6 °C 
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 35 °C
29.5 °C34.8 °C28.4 °C
28.7 °C34.5 °C28.7 °C
28.3 °C30.4 °C29.2 °C
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 30.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31.6 °C / 89 F for the devices in the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 38.4 °C / 101 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 38 °C / 100 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.6 °C / 89 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31.6 °C / 89 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 30.5 °C / 86.9 F (-4.8 °C / -8.6 F).
表面温度应力测试(正面)
表面温度应力测试(正面)
表面温度应力测试(背面)
表面温度应力测试(背面)
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Lenovo Legion Go S
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
GPD Pocket 4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Heat
-9%
1%
-8%
-14%
Maximum Upper Side *
36.6
40
-9%
33.8
8%
42.7
-17%
41.8
-14%
Maximum Bottom *
34.8
35.5
-2%
35.2
-1%
39.7
-14%
35.9
-3%
Idle Upper Side *
27.5
32.5
-18%
26.6
3%
28
-2%
31.6
-15%
Idle Bottom *
27.2
29.2
-7%
28.6
-5%
27.2
-0%
33.6
-24%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

该设备的两个立体声扬声器非常出色,与旧款微星爪机相比再次得到了改进。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.442.5253132.13126.930.44029.232.2502629.76329.130.48024.43610021.943.312520.749.716019.453.720018.361.32501962.731516.766.940013.468.850011.770.763011.372.180010.473.2100010.672.9125010.472.3160010.274.1200010.874.825001173.2315011.373.5400011.770.7500012.374630012.675.7800013.171.21000013.168.11250012.858.6160001248.3SPL24.285N0.666.6median 12.3median 70.7Delta3.16.247.951.543.837.341.938.73934.337.134.831.236.829.831.830.631.332.132.232.219.326.135.921.928.338.418.830.742.62135.349.61940.951.616.943.549.815.34249.813.242.262.713.25572.515.364.774.915.167.17212.663.867.113.359.167.613.959.668.813.860.964.414.456.460.214.452.356.614.748.664.614.756.770.314.662.37014.661.962.514.854.463.114.755.155.913.74880.426.672.542.90.726.3median 62.7median 14.7median 55101.29.836.834.836.837.226.937.238.622.938.636.82036.839.122.739.14120.44142.32042.343.419.543.44519.94548.814.948.852.214.952.256.415.756.46117.76167.917.367.97112.97179.214.279.279.918.179.97813.37878.313.878.376.813.276.876.81276.877.81377.882.311.682.386.912.986.979.71279.769.912.269.972.712.372.76912.46964.612.264.666.812.166.891.925.891.989.10.789.1median 72.7median 13.2median 72.78.21.88.242.438.438.731.733.733.532.130.727.327.428.627.622.63321.735.119.841.618.147.72056.222.557.81562.412.963.412.563.712.374.211.977.911.778.211.376.210.876.111.376.411.674.211.976.512.377.612.676.812.776.412.777.612.777.312.669.811.756.624.788.20.677.6median 12.6median 76.12.38.342.946.838.239.233.63633.335.430.434.127.334.122.834.123.74021.848.620.150.421.95922.262.617.866.31565.212.870.213.574.713.376.812.175.812.374.311.975.912.279.112.676.21376.213.476.913.571.713.872.813.768.313.964.213.756.41349.825.887.20.871.8median 13.5median 71.72.47.944.347.345.837.239.633.832.435.531.236.937.545.332.535.641.329.830.633.228.528.329.624.424.626.429.621.426.94320.83957.620.752.865.718.861.270.816.767.271.613.369.57013.168.269.111.9667111.866.972.112.469.271.412.368.472.21270.170.312.5707212.669.570.412.867.366.813.268.269.513.271.470.713.272.564.113.371.271.113.172.474.112.872.669.912.167.782.725.481.855.60.651.6median 70.3median 13.1median 68.26.12.6641.143.130.236.626.234.833.433.524.72924.629.618.532.813.543.71452.913.854.813.556.711.856.811.76211.868.111.472.911.676.411.379.511.278.811.675.411.775.611.975.511.972.812.47112.768.513.159.213.158.413.463.413.167.312.764.71269.324.485.80.559.7median 12median 68.10.78.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Claw 8 AI+Lenovo Legion Go SGPD Pocket 4Asus ROG Ally XMSI ClawValve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Claw 8 AI+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Go S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

GPD Pocket 4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 22% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Ally X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

MSI Claw audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量

65 瓦电源
65 瓦电源

尽管 Claw 8 的显示屏更大,但它在空闲时比前一代产品和其他竞争对手更加节俭。我们在压力测试中测得的最大耗电量为 59 瓦,约一分钟后耗电量降至 50 瓦。游戏时,我们测得的功耗约为 46 瓦。因此,随附的 65 瓦插入式电源(重 192 克)大小适中。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.46 / 0.48 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.2 / 6.3 / 6.6 Watt
Load midlight 40.6 / 59.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 8"
Lenovo Legion Go S
Z2 Go, Radeon 680M, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N, IPS-Grade, 1920x1200, 8"
GPD Pocket 4
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Asus ROG Ally X
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4"
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Power Consumption
-41%
-28%
-19%
-60%
-1%
-42%
Idle Minimum *
3.2
5.3
-66%
6
-88%
4.3
-34%
7.8
-144%
4.5
-41%
6.66
-108%
Idle Average *
6.3
9.4
-49%
8.8
-40%
6.7
-6%
11.5
-83%
7.21
-14%
7.11
-13%
Idle Maximum *
6.6
15.5
-135%
9.2
-39%
7.5
-14%
11.8
-79%
9.66
-46%
11.7
-77%
Load Average *
40.6
53.1
-31%
48.2
-19%
53.1
-31%
22.86
44%
46.708
-15%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
47
47.6
-1%
50.1
-7%
61.3
-30%
54.4
-16%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
46.7
45.4
3%
45.7
2%
53.9
-15%
Load Maximum *
59.3
57.8
3%
56.4
5%
66.8
-13%
64.6
-9%
27.8
53%
56.7
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.1

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø53.2 (46.8-59.3)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.04 (4.85-5.48)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø47 (43.3-51.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø51 (44.8-58)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø53.1 (22.1-55.1)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø21.3 (20.2-43.7)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø55.1 (53.9-55.8)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø38.2 (36.8-47.4)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.6 (5.39-6.75)
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø46.7 (44.1-53.5)

运行时间

微星将手持设备的电池容量提高到了 80 Wh,再加上其较低的消耗值,因此运行时间非常出色。游戏时,这在很大程度上取决于所选的能耗模式:在我们的测试中,在最快模式下,《赛博朋克》运行了 01:45 小时(约 25fps),而在人工智能引擎模式下,仅运行了不到 3.5 小时(约 19fps)。

在 150 cd/m²(测试设备最大亮度的 29%)条件下进行的普通 WLAN 测试中,我们测得的运行时间接近 24 小时,即使在全亮度条件下,运行时间也超过了 16.5 小时(均为 60 Hz),这都是非常长的运行时间。

电池信息
电池信息
充电过程
充电过程
Battery Runtime
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
1h 45min
WiFi Websurfing
23h 33min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
16h 37min
MSI Claw 8 AI+
Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 Wh
Lenovo Legion Go S
Z2 Go, Radeon 680M, 55.5 Wh
GPD Pocket 4
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 45 Wh
Asus ROG Ally X
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 53 Wh
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, 50 Wh
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 65 Wh
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Battery Runtime
-33%
-74%
-8%
-48%
-60%
-54%
-59%
WiFi v1.3
1413
518
-63%
373
-74%
949
-33%
466
-67%
559
-60%
648
-54%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
105
102
-3%
124
18%
76
-28%
Gaming
252
Witcher 3 ultra
72

Notebookcheck 总评分

MSI Claw 8 AI+ - 03/06/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
87 / 98 → 89%
Mechanical Inputs
71%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
69 / 68 → 100%
Weight
78 / 69-83 → 67%
Battery
93%
Display
81%
Games Performance
57 / 75 → 75%
Application Performance
84 / 92 → 92%
Temperature
92%
Noise
83%
Audio
89 / 91 → 97%
Average
64%
85%
Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
84.4%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 32.8%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微星Claw 8 AI+评测--得益于英特尔Lunar Lake技术的最佳游戏掌上电脑?
Andreas Osthoff, 2025-03- 7 (Update: 2025-03- 7)