微星Claw 8 AI+评测--得益于英特尔Lunar Lake技术的最佳游戏掌上电脑？

Name: MSI Claw 8 AI+
Brand: MSI

巨大进步。

微星新推出的 Claw 8 AI+ 是该厂商首款游戏掌机的重大改进。此外，它还配备了英特尔更高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器、刷新率达 120Hz 的更大 8 英寸显示屏和 VRR，以及 80 瓦时的大电池。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/07/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI Arc Handheld Gaming Laptop / Notebook Lunar Lake Thunderbolt Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7 Windows

结论 - MSI Claw 8 AI+ 是最好的游戏掌上电脑之一，但也非常昂贵

微星对其第二代游戏掌上电脑进行了大规模改进，但在原版表现如此糟糕的情况下，这是很有必要的。其低效的流星湖处理器尤其是个问题。不过，由于采用了新的 Claw 8 AI+ 的 Lunar Lake 芯片，这款机型的表现要好得多。这意味着更好的游戏性能（与 ROG Ally X相比）、更低的能耗和更长的运行时间。它的风扇也变得更安静了，但微星真的应该看看它们在持续负载下的波动速度。

Test device courtesy of MSI Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

在连接性方面，该设备的第二个 USB-C 端口非常受欢迎，其更大的 IPS 屏幕也令人印象深刻，刷新率高达 120 赫兹，并具有 VRR 功能，但其响应时间略逊于前代机型。前代机型。

微星软件整体运行良好，但有时会有些卡顿，而且其功能范围赶不上华硕的同类产品。这款掌上电脑的能耗曲线也有点尴尬，因为它的人工智能引擎只能提供降低的性能。考虑到它的性能和功能，899.99 美元的价格在我们看来是合理的，但当然也不是什么便宜货。

Pros

+ 良好的游戏性能

+ 120-Hz 显示屏和 VRR

+ 稳定且高质量的机箱

+ 良好的输入设备

+ 超长运行时间

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 32 GB 内存、2 倍雷电 4 和 Wi-Fi 7

+ 可更换的 M.2-2230 固态硬盘

+ 快速 microSD 读卡器

Cons

- 复杂的能量曲线

- 风扇转速在负载情况下波动

- 无网络摄像头

- 微星软件有时略显迟缓

价格和供应情况

微星 Claw 8 AI+ 的售价为 899.99 美元，可通过亚马逊等主要在线零售商购买。

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Height	Display
1. 84.7%	MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $1,349.00 MSI Claw A1M Gaming Laptop (... 2. $629.99 MSI Claw PC Gaming Handheld:... 3. $9.98 GXLYFG 3 Pack Tempered Glass... List Price: 999€	793 g	30 mm	8.00" 1920x1200 283 PPI IPS
2. 84.6%	Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $479.22 List Price: 899€	685 g	36.9 mm	7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI IPS
3. 68.3%	Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $8.99 Fhyeugfy for Lenovo Legion G... 2. $64.99 Legion Go USB-C Hub Dock for... 3. $22.99 Hard Case Compatible with MS... List Price: 700€	738 g	22.6 mm	8.00" 1920x1200 283 PPI IPS-Grade
4. 88.9% ^{v7 (old)}	Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU ⎘ AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $524.06 List Price: 679€	640 g	49 mm	7.40" 1280x800 204 PPI OLED
5. 80.2%	GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory	Amazon: List Price: 1400 USD	777 g	22.2 mm	8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI IPS
6. 77.4%	MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $530.21 List Price: 849€	672 g	33 mm	7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI IPS
7. 84.9% ^{v7 (old)}	ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory	Amazon: List Price: 1017 USD	876 g	43 mm	8.40" 2560x1600 IPS

结论 - MSI Claw 8 AI+ 是最好的游戏掌上电脑之一，但也非常昂贵
规格
外壳和连接
软件 - MSI Center M
输入设备 - 霍尔效应触发器和摇杆
显示屏 - 8 英寸 IPS，120 赫兹刷新率和 VRR
性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Lunar Lake 处理器
排放与能源
Notebookcheck 总评分

微星的 Claw 8 AI+ 是该厂商的第二代游戏掌机，性能大幅提升，但仍使用英特尔处理器。我们的测试设备是售价 899.99 美元的微星 Claw 8 AI+ AV2M-015 版本，配备了英特尔酷睿 7 258V(Lunar Lake)、32 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘以及刷新率为 120 Hz 和 VRR 的全新 8 英寸 IPS 显示屏。

规格

MSI Claw 8 AI+ (Claw Series)

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V 8 x 2.2 - 4.8 GHz, 37 W PL2 / Short Burst, 30 W PL1 / Sustained, Lunar Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 32.0.101.6449

Memory

32 GB

, LPDDR5x-8533, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

8.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 283 PPI, Capacitive, PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 120 Hz

Storage

Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, 512 GB

, 869 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Lunar Lake SOC - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel BE201 320MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 299 x 126

Battery

80 Wh, 6900 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, 65W PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

793 g, Power Supply: 192 g

Price

999 Euro

Links

MSI homepage
MSI notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳和连接

微星对这款掌上电脑的设计进行了重大改动，除了外壳更大之外，手柄也变成了沙色，看起来非常漂亮。这让该设备看起来更有质感，也使其有别于一般只有黑色的竞争对手。这两款手柄再次采用了 LED 光环。尽管 Claw 8 的外壳较大，但手感很好，我们可以长时间使用而没有任何问题。它的稳定性和制造质量都非常好，我们没有注意到吱吱作响的声音。

机箱背面可以轻松拆卸，必要时可以更换 M.2-2230 固态硬盘和电池。现在还有第二个 Thunderbolt 4 端口可用，设备的快速 microSD 读卡器和 Wi-Fi 7 模块依然存在。它是一款 Copilot+ 设备，但没有安装网络摄像头。它的部分包装可以改装成支架。

与 ROG Ally X，你会立即发现其 8 英寸显示屏所带来的不同，当然，这款手持设备的整体尺寸也明显更大。此外，Claw 8 的重量比 ROG Ally X 重约 100 克。

尺寸比较

连接：音量按钮、3.5 毫米音频、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery 3.0）、带指纹扫描仪的电源按钮

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	201 MB/s
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)	184.04 MB/s -8%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	121 MB/s -40%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (20.9 - 201, n=14, last 2 years)	114.5 MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro v60)	89.2 MB/s -56%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	85.19 MB/s -58%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	55 MB/s -73%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	32.9 MB/s -84%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro v60)	260.1 MB/s +19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)	251.05 MB/s +15%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	218.7 MB/s
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	204.2 MB/s -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (74.7 - 260, n=13, last 2 years)	167.4 MB/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	89.85 MB/s -59%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	74.7 MB/s -66%

Networking
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel BE201 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1663 (min: 1554) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1561 (min: 1517) MBit/s ∼91%
Lenovo Legion Go S MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1783 (min: 1709) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1713 (min: 869) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1890 (min: 1782) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1747 (min: 1672) MBit/s ∼94%
GPD Pocket 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1281 (min: 1157) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1380 (min: 1142) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1224 (min: 1083) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	942 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼51%
Asus ROG Ally X MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1675 (min: 1467) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1686 (min: 1452) MBit/s ∼98%
MSI Claw Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1582 (min: 1462) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1524 (min: 1468) MBit/s ∼89%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Quectel FC66E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	917 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	999 (min: 941) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1762 (min: 1653) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1858 (min: 1771) MBit/s ∼100%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1553 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1405 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1532 (min: 1497) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1397 (min: 1288) MBit/s ∼75%

MSI Claw 8 AI+; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1663 (1554-1715)

MSI Claw 8 AI+; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1561 (1517-1595)

可持续性

微星没有提供任何有关该设备可持续性、使用可回收材料或环保证书的信息。该产品的包装主要由纸板制成，可以回收利用。

软件 - MSI Center M

在小型触摸屏上使用过 Windows 的人都知道，操作起来有多别扭。因此，制造商提供的软件对用户体验就显得尤为重要。就 Claw 8 而言，与上一代产品一样，它使用的软件是 MSI Center M，启动时会自动打开。这里会显示已安装的游戏，并可访问所有设置。此外，还有一个可定制的快速菜单，可用于随时调整重要设置（如亮度、性能模式、性能监控等）。与旧版本一样，该软件总体上运行良好，但其整体功能范围明显小于 ArmoryCrate SE 软件。华硕 ROG Ally X上的 ArmoryCrate SE 软件相比，其整体功能范围明显较小，而且偶尔会有点卡顿。

输入设备 - 霍尔效应触发器和摇杆

微星继续为 Claw 8 使用霍尔效应触发器和摇杆，实际效果非常好。特别是触发器的阻力比 Ally X的阻力更大一些，这在玩游戏时感觉更好一些。D-pad 精准且安静，而右侧的常规按键并不显眼。摇杆和触发器的配置选项也可通过微星软件进行设置。当然，手持设备的电容式触摸屏也可用于输入。

显示屏 - 8 英寸 IPS，120 赫兹刷新率和 VRR

微星将手持设备的屏幕尺寸从 7 英寸（16:9）增至 8 英寸（16:10，1,920 x 1,080 像素）。不过，它的基本功能，包括 120Hz 刷新率和 VRR 支持都没有变化。此外，尽管其黑度和对比度自然无法与 OLED 面板相比，但其画质非常出色。虽然没有使用 PWM 闪烁，但其响应时间略微变慢。

通过使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析，我们测得的平均亮度为 524 cd/m²，对比度超过 1,500:1 。不过，这样的亮度是以过冷的色温为代价的，我们注意到画面偏蓝--总的来说，它的出厂校准不是特别好。我们通过自己的校准大大改善了这一问题（我们的配置文件可在右侧免费下载），但这也使其最大亮度降低了约 50 cd/m²。该显示器完全覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间。


518 cd/m²	519 cd/m²	533 cd/m²
504 cd/m²	524 cd/m²	509 cd/m²
501 cd/m²	498 cd/m²	519 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

PN8007QB1-2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 533 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 513.9 cd/m² Minimum: 12.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 524 cd/m²
Contrast: 1588:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
72.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI Claw 8 AI+ PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz	Lenovo Legion Go S LEN91C1, IPS-Grade, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz	GPD Pocket 4 YHB03P24, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz	Asus ROG Ally X TL070FVXS01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz	MSI Claw TL070FVXS02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz	Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED ANX7530 U, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4", 90 Hz	ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 FLQ8423-24L0, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4", 60 Hz
Display		-2%	18%	-6%	-5%	25%	14%
Display P3 Coverage	71.1	69.71 -2%	92.7 30%	66.2 -7%	67 -6%	99.6 40%	91.9 29%
sRGB Coverage	98.5	99.02 1%	99.6 1%	93.4 -5%	94.4 -4%	100 2%	99.3 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	72.9	70.34 -4%	90 23%	68.5 -6%	69.4 -5%	96.1 32%	81.6 12%
Response Times		-36%	-17%	61%	59%	51%	-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	23.7 ?(11, 12.7)	30.8 ?(14.6, 16.2) -30%	27.9 ?(13.4, 14.5) -18%	9.7 ?(4.4, 5.3) 59%	9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6) 61%	9 ?(4.5, 4.5) 62%	25.5 ?(11.5, 25) -8%
Response Time Black / White *	14.9 ?(7.8, 7.1)	21.2 ?(11.4, 9.8) -42%	17.2 ?(8.3, 8.9) -15%	5.7 ?(2.5, 3.2) 62%	6.6 ?(3.1, 3.5) 56%	9 ?(4.5, 4.5) 40%	22.73 ?(11.05, 11.67) -53%
PWM Frequency						360 ?(100)
Screen		-42%	-9%	-1%	4%	143%	-4%
Brightness middle	524	538.8 3%	511.2 -2%	484 -8%	477 -9%	485 -7%	318 -39%
Brightness	514	509 -1%	524 2%	456 -11%	461 -10%	482 -6%	287 -44%
Brightness Distribution	93	93 0%	84 -10%	88 -5%	88 -5%	98 5%	48 -48%
Black Level *	0.33	0.46 -39%	0.4 -21%	0.35 -6%	0.32 3%	0.03 91%	0.1118 66%
Contrast	1588	1171 -26%	1278 -20%	1383 -13%	1491 -6%	16167 918%	2844 79%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.5	7.2 -106%	4.54 -30%	2.9 17%	2.6 26%	2 43%	4.81 -37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.3	12.5 -71%	8.96 -23%	7.1 3%	5.8 21%	5 32%	6.93 5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.3	2.3 -77%	0.95 27%	1.4 -8%	1.5 -15%		1.53 -18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.9	9.5 -61%	6.4 -8%	4.5 24%	3.9 34%	2 66%	6.12 -4%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.44 ^90%	2.26 ^97%	2.24 ^98%	2.17 ^101%	2 ^110%	2.003 ^110%
CCT	7852 ^83%	9485 ^69%	8125 ^80%	7534 ^86%	7250 ^90%	6336 ^103%	7707 ^84%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-27% / -33%	-3% / -5%	18% / 7%	19% / 10%	73% / 101%	-7% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
14.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.8 ms rise
14.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
23.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
23.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8471 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在烈日下，由于触摸屏反光，这款手持设备显得有些吃力，但这并不奇怪。其视角稳定性也没有问题。

性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Lunar Lake 处理器

测试条件

Claw 8 具有三种不同的能量曲线（续航、AI 引擎、手动），默认情况下选择的是AI 引擎。根据使用情况，设备会自动选择最佳的功率参数，但在我们的测试中，它只是保持在 17 瓦。要想获得尽可能高的游戏性能，你必须使用手动模式，然后可以在 8、17 和 30 瓦的 TDP 限制之间进行选择（但只能在 M Center 应用程序中进行选择，而不是快速菜单）。我们在手动模式和 30 瓦功率下进行了以下基准测试和测量。

处理器 - Core Ultra 7 258V

酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 酷睿至尊 7 258V来自英特尔的 Lunar Lake 系列，拥有 8 个核心，在微星魔爪中的最大功耗为 37/30 瓦。由于核心数量较少，Lunar Lake 芯片的多核性能要弱于老式的 Meteor Lake 芯片和 AMD CPU，但其单核性能比以前更好。即使把 Claw 8 AI+ 当作一台普通电脑使用，其性能也完全可以胜任大多数日常任务。在持续负载的情况下，性能损失微乎其微，我们也没有注意到电池工作性能进一步下降。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1491 (1472.1-1573.87)

Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go: Ø852 (844.29-855.16)

GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø2402 (2245.42-2499.38)

Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø2187 (2041.02-2336.18)

MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1922 (1902.14-1950.08)

ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2092 (2081.49-2100.51)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	91.2 pt
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	82.8 pt
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	75.9 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	72.8 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	72.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	71.7 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC	71 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED ^-6! AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	39.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	34.7 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	16546 (14363.5^min - 16546.4^max) Points +56%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	15120 Points +43%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	14463 Points +36%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	13224 Points +25%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3984 - 16841, n=17, last 2 years)	12135 Points +14%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	10599 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9114 - 11097, n=14)	10387 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	5778 Points -45%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	3984 Points -62%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2006 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1664 - 1947, n=14)	1852 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	1825 Points
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1770 Points -3%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	1733 Points -5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1731 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1088 - 2006, n=16, last 2 years)	1688 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	1281 Points -30%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6449 Points +58%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	5794 Points +42%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	5168 Points +26%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4805 Points +17%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1521 - 6577, n=15, last 2 years)	4674 Points +14%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	4092 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3530 - 4314, n=14)	4031 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	2051 Points -50%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	1521 Points -63%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	787 Points +11%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	711 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (643 - 749, n=14)	708 Points 0%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	684 Points -4%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	676 Points -5%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	672 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (357 - 787, n=15, last 2 years)	629 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	390 Points -45%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	357 Points -50%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2499 (2245.42^min - 2499.38^max) Points +59%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	2336 (2041.02^min - 2336.18^max) Points +48%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	2101 (2081.49^min - 2100.51^max) Points +33%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1950 (1902.14^min - 1950.08^max) Points +24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (689 - 2533, n=15, last 2 years)	1877 Points +19%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1504 - 1656, n=14)	1598 Points +2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	1574 (1472.1^min - 1573.87^max) Points
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	855 (844.29^min - 855.16^max) Points -46%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	689 Points -56%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	304 Points +7%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	285 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (258 - 298, n=14)	284 Points 0%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	264 Points -7%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	262 Points -8%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	256 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (155.1 - 304, n=14, last 2 years)	254 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	155.1 Points -46%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	588 Seconds * -76%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (315 - 414, n=14)	349 Seconds * -4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	334 Seconds *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (189 - 588, n=13, last 2 years)	281 Seconds * +16%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	246 Seconds * +26%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	241 Seconds * +28%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	214 Seconds * +36%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	192 Seconds * +43%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	66618 MIPS +87%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	64454 MIPS +81%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	56268 MIPS +58%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	53599 MIPS +50%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19684 - 66618, n=14, last 2 years)	50981 MIPS +43%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	35705 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (32198 - 36724, n=14)	35313 MIPS -1%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	23583 MIPS -34%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	19684 MIPS -45%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6143 MIPS +8%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	6077 MIPS +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (5265 - 5869, n=14)	5695 MIPS +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	5682 MIPS 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	5662 MIPS
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5318 MIPS -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3653 - 6143, n=14, last 2 years)	5316 MIPS -6%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	3675 MIPS -35%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	3653 MIPS -35%

Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13426 Points +23%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	12026 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9311 - 11334, n=14)	10906 Points 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	10899 Points
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10464 Points -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4587 - 13426, n=16, last 2 years)	9530 Points -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	7427 Points -32%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	4966 Points -54%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	4587 Points -58%

Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2904 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2593 - 2795, n=14)	2738 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	2716 Points
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	2550 Points -6%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2433 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1348 - 2904, n=16, last 2 years)	2305 Points -15%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	2243 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	1400 Points -48%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	1348 Points -50%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	11975 Points +27%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	10713 Points +13%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10076 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (7717 - 9864, n=14)	9494 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	9439 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3932 - 11975, n=16, last 2 years)	8765 Points -7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	7743 Points -18%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	4457 Points -53%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	3932 Points -58%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2134 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1891 - 2046, n=14)	1995 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	1969 Points
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	1917 Points -3%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1780 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (875 - 2134, n=16, last 2 years)	1707 Points -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1622 Points -18%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU	1486 Points -25%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	875 Points -56%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	20.3 fps +55%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	18.7 fps +43%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	15.8 fps +21%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7.07 - 20.8, n=14, last 2 years)	15.4 fps +18%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	14.7 fps +12%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	13.1 fps
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (10.5 - 14.2, n=14)	12.6 fps -4%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	7.07 fps -46%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	92.8 s * -126%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	57.8 s * -41%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (41.1 - 92.8, n=14, last 2 years)	55.2 s * -34%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	51.4 s * -25%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	49.7 s * -21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (41.1 - 59.3, n=14)	49.6 s * -21%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	46.2 s * -12%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	41.1 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	0.756 sec * -68%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.4167 - 0.756, n=15, last 2 years)	0.508 sec * -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	0.4795 sec * -7%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4665 sec * -4%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	0.4601 sec * -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (0.4457 - 0.4852, n=14)	0.4571 sec * -2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	0.4492 sec *
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.4167 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1574 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

167.1 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

285 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

711 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4092 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

10599 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1825 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

120 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

590 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	89.4 pt
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	89.4 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	84.3 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC	73.2 pt
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	57.1 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	53 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	51.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	32.6 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	25805 KRay/s +111%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	24519 KRay/s +101%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	21814 KRay/s +78%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6990 - 26450, n=15, last 2 years)	18926 KRay/s +55%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	12224 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9215 - 12781, n=14)	11669 KRay/s -5%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10795 KRay/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	6990 KRay/s -43%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	103637 Points +69%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	95655 Points +56%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	91595 Points +50%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (42932 - 109745, n=15, last 2 years)	80791 Points +32%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	61266 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (48758 - 63401, n=14)	58418 Points -5%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	58068 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	42932 Points -30%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	4475 MB/s +66%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	4465 MB/s +66%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	4211 MB/s +56%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1403 - 4847, n=15, last 2 years)	3636 MB/s +35%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2707 MB/s 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	2696 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2271 - 2817, n=14)	2621 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	1403 MB/s -48%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	107867 Points +117%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	99496 Points +100%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (41744 - 114294, n=15, last 2 years)	82055 Points +65%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	80927 Points +63%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69419 Points +40%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	49750 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49510 - 49818, n=14)	49700 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	45741 Points -8%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	16640 Points +276%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	14281 Points +223%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	13607 Points +208%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4425 - 16980, n=15, last 2 years)	11661 Points +164%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	8463 Points +91%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	5002 Points +13%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	4425 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4103 - 4440, n=14)	4393 Points -1%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	55457 Points +70%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	50357 Points +55%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	48428 Points +49%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (23380 - 58482, n=15, last 2 years)	42674 Points +31%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	32540 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (25361 - 33565, n=14)	30720 Points -6%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	28245 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	23738 Points -27%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	149047 MB/s +288%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (21547 - 166333, n=15, last 2 years)	86298 MB/s +124%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	80158 MB/s +108%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	69125 MB/s +80%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	59882 MB/s +56%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (37728 - 40753, n=14)	38932 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	38453 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	21547 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	1077 MB/s +75%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	987 MB/s +60%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	899 MB/s +46%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (356 - 1112, n=15, last 2 years)	818 MB/s +33%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	796 MB/s +29%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	616 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (499 - 632, n=14)	594 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	356 MB/s -42%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	13665 KRay/s +103%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	13049 KRay/s +94%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	11335 KRay/s +68%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3766 - 14181, n=15, last 2 years)	10004 KRay/s +49%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	6728 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4891 - 6930, n=14)	6222 KRay/s -8%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	5732 KRay/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	3766 KRay/s -44%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	54726 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (51323 - 54971, n=14)	53794 MPixel/s -2%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	49287 MPixel/s -10%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	49112 MPixel/s -10%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	39932 MPixel/s -27%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19472 - 54726, n=15, last 2 years)	38064 MPixel/s -30%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	26622 MPixel/s -51%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	19472 MPixel/s -64%

系统性能

由于采用了现代化的组件，Claw 8 AI+ 的响应速度非常快，我们在测试过程中没有遇到任何稳定性问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	7471 Points +2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	7314 Points
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7149 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7314, n=14)	6930 Points -5%
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	6504 Points -11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5219 - 7471, n=15, last 2 years)	6429 Points -12%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U	5900 Points -19%
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	5219 Points -29%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	11262 Points +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	11110 Points
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10633 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 11467, n=14)	10380 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (8427 - 11262, n=15, last 2 years)	9897 Points -11%
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	9610 Points -14%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U	9247 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	8427 Points -24%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	10031 Points +5%
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	9912 Points +4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	9535 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9619, n=14)	8871 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7213 - 10031, n=15, last 2 years)	8585 Points -10%
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	8346 Points -12%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U	7323 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	7213 Points -24%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	10026 Points
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	10017 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9333 - 10048, n=14)	9827 Points -2%
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	9408 Points -6%
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	9311 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6350 - 10026, n=15, last 2 years)	8520 Points -15%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U	8233 Points -18%
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	6350 Points -37%

CrossMark / Overall
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1847 Points +7%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	1731 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1590 - 1742, n=13)	1695 Points -2%
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	1693 Points -2%
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1693 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (840 - 1847, n=13, last 2 years)	1466 Points -15%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U	1340 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	865 Points -50%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	840 Points -51%

CrossMark / Productivity
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1719 Points +3%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	1672 Points
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	1649 Points -1%
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1639 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1684, n=13)	1636 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (874 - 1719, n=13, last 2 years)	1452 Points -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U	1416 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	878 Points -47%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	874 Points -48%

CrossMark / Creativity
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2077 Points +8%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	1919 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1727 - 1977, n=13)	1915 Points 0%
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1868 Points -3%
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	1795 Points -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (808 - 2077, n=13, last 2 years)	1547 Points -19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U	1278 Points -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	891 Points -54%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	808 Points -58%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1610 Points +14%
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	1538 Points +9%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	1411 Points
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1392 Points -1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U	1309 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1411, n=13)	1308 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (759 - 1610, n=13, last 2 years)	1302 Points -8%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	831 Points -41%
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	759 Points -46%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	323 Points +3%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	314 Points
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	304 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (219 - 314, n=12)	279 Points -11%
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	276 Points -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (188.4 - 323, n=15, last 2 years)	269 Points -14%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U	230 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	225.6 Points -28%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	291 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (199.5 - 291, n=14)	267 Points -8%
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	266 Points -9%
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	255 Points -12%
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	248 Points -15%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (107 - 291, n=12, last 2 years)	218 Points -25%
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	186.4 Points -36%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	107 Points -63%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	895 ms * -87%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (428 - 895, n=15, last 2 years)	576 ms * -20%
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	536 ms * -12%
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	529 ms * -10%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U	518 ms * -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=14)	487 ms * -2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	479 ms *
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	428 ms * +11%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7314 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (107682 - 114336, n=14)	108793 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	107929 MB/s
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	89385 MB/s -17%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	81717 MB/s -24%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	74414 MB/s -31%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (32617 - 107929, n=16, last 2 years)	66629 MB/s -38%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	45050 MB/s -58%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	43750 MB/s -59%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU	32617 MB/s -70%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	100208 MB/s +14%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	87827 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89417, n=14)	87112 MB/s -1%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	80481 MB/s -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25380 - 100208, n=15, last 2 years)	59813 MB/s -32%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	58713 MB/s -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	38572 MB/s -56%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	37657 MB/s -57%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU	25380 MB/s -71%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	117883 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (109734 - 117935, n=14)	116936 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	106998 MB/s -9%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	98820 MB/s -16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25596 - 117883, n=17, last 2 years)	75657 MB/s -36%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75350 MB/s -36%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	49797 MB/s -58%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	48811 MB/s -59%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU	25596 MB/s -78%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	139.6 ns * -40%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	132.3 ns * -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M	129.3 ns * -30%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (99.8 - 147.6, n=16, last 2 years)	124.5 ns * -25%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	122.1 ns * -22%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU	112.6 ns * -13%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	105.5 ns * -6%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	99.8 ns *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95 - 101.1, n=14)	97.3 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在延迟测试中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备没有显示出任何限制。有一个驱动程序确实有点故障，但重要的中断到进程延迟值非常低。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	2293.5 μs * -370%
Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1486.6 μs * -205%
Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	1435.6 μs * -194%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U	995 μs * -104%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	487.7 μs *
GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	471.3 μs * +3%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

微星安装了一块来自 Kioxia 的紧凑型 1TB M.2-2230 SSD（首次启动后可用容量为 869 GB），可以顺利更换。在我们的测试中，PCIe 4.0 SSD 的传输速率非常好，而且完全保持稳定。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5147 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5085 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 854 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 578 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 155.2 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1638 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2284 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 ^-11!	90.7 pt
GPD Pocket 4	80.5 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	71.7 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC	65.6 pt
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	64.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	61.8 pt
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	61.4 pt
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	60.4 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED ^-11! Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	44.4 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	5565 (3733.98^min - 5564.79^max) MB/s +77%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18	4421 (4398.57^min - 4420.59^max) MB/s +41%
GPD Pocket 4	3543 (3463.87^min - 3542.51^max) MB/s +13%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	3141 (3077.71^min - 3140.5^max) MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (431 - 5565, n=16, last 2 years)	2900 MB/s -8%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	2878 (2833.46^min - 2878.46^max) MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2693 (2674.18^min - 2692.74^max) MB/s -14%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (2288 - 3141, n=3)	2658 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	2569 (2495.19^min - 2569.22^max) MB/s -18%
seq write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18	5102 (4976.45^min - 5101.6^max) MB/s +19%
GPD Pocket 4	4625 (3480.81^min - 4624.62^max) MB/s +8%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	4301 (4221.3^min - 4301.05^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	3185 (1268.34^min - 3185.29^max) MB/s -26%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (1985 - 4301, n=3)	3111 MB/s -28%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (259 - 5102, n=16, last 2 years)	2865 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2768 (2498.37^min - 2767.74^max) MB/s -36%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	2758 (2188.17^min - 2758.38^max) MB/s -36%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	1056 (164.42^min - 1056.34^max) MB/s -75%
seq q8 t1 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18	7005 (6255.88^min - 7004.74^max) MB/s +22%
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	6440 (5527.73^min - 6439.51^max) MB/s +12%
GPD Pocket 4	6355 (5605.9^min - 6355.08^max) MB/s +11%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	5739 (4997.3^min - 5739.33^max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (4075 - 5913, n=3)	5242 MB/s -9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (2458 - 7005, n=16, last 2 years)	5024 MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4952 (4163.75^min - 4951.75^max) MB/s -14%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	3760 (2910.85^min - 3760.19^max) MB/s -34%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	2458 (2277.98^min - 2458.28^max) MB/s -57%
seq q8 t1 write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18	6151 (6074.61^min - 6150.81^max) MB/s +17%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	5252 (5232^min - 5251.88^max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (4639 - 5370, n=3)	5087 MB/s -3%
GPD Pocket 4	4867 (4538.6^min - 4867.19^max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	4568 (1284.66^min - 4568.32^max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (256 - 6151, n=16, last 2 years)	3272 MB/s -38%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3033 (2657.93^min - 3033.11^max) MB/s -42%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	2871 (2238.71^min - 2871^max) MB/s -45%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	1088 (990.07^min - 1088.21^max) MB/s -79%
4k q1 t1 read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	97.4 (60.76^min - 97.44^max) MB/s +88%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	68 (66.96^min - 68^max) MB/s +31%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18	64.2 (61.66^min - 64.21^max) MB/s +24%
GPD Pocket 4	59 (58.74^min - 58.95^max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (37.3 - 97.4, n=16, last 2 years)	58.8 MB/s +13%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	51.9 (48.63^min - 51.87^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	51.5 (50.22^min - 51.53^max) MB/s -1%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (41.7 - 51.9, n=3)	48.4 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	46.1 (44.66^min - 46.06^max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 write
GPD Pocket 4	227 (220.18^min - 227.04^max) MB/s +30%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	226 (185.56^min - 226.08^max) MB/s +29%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18	181.4 (169.88^min - 181.36^max) MB/s +4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (112 - 262, n=17, last 2 years)	177.7 MB/s +2%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	174.9 (155.08^min - 174.93^max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (119.3 - 174.9, n=3)	152 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	140.9 (139.71^min - 140.94^max) MB/s -19%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	112.3 (81.5^min - 112.29^max) MB/s -36%
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	112 (100.07^min - 111.98^max) MB/s -36%
4k q32 t16 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18	4025 (4006.61^min - 4024.99^max) MB/s +43%
GPD Pocket 4	3497 (1357.47^min - 3497.01^max) MB/s +24%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	2811 (2783.79^min - 2810.81^max) MB/s
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	2148 (2142.5^min - 2147.8^max) MB/s -24%
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	1893 (1813.54^min - 1893.35^max) MB/s -33%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (1091 - 2811, n=3)	1817 MB/s -35%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (86 - 4025, n=16, last 2 years)	1791 MB/s -36%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1106 (1031.05^min - 1105.71^max) MB/s -61%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	407 (296.91^min - 406.67^max) MB/s -86%
4k q32 t16 write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18	2452 (2245.51^min - 2452.41^max) MB/s +43%
GPD Pocket 4	1720 (1666.75^min - 1720.14^max) MB/s 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	1714 (1195.48^min - 1713.63^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	1222 (1181.65^min - 1222.42^max) MB/s -29%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (89.1 - 3088, n=16, last 2 years)	1216 MB/s -29%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (474 - 1714, n=3)	1144 MB/s -33%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	542 (404.55^min - 542.06^max) MB/s -68%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	447 (437.78^min - 446.91^max) MB/s -74%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	89.1 (82.16^min - 89.09^max) MB/s -95%

AS SSD
Score Total
GPD Pocket 4	6318 Points +18%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	5356 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (2412 - 8425, n=11, last 2 years)	5339 Points 0%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (4199 - 5371, n=3)	4975 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	4941 Points -8%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4711 Points -12%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	4480 Points -16%
Score Read
GPD Pocket 4	2849 Points +27%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	2252 Points
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	2231 Points -1%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	2189 Points -3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (842 - 2849, n=11, last 2 years)	2065 Points -8%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (1512 - 2252, n=3)	1841 Points -18%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1315 Points -42%
Score Write
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2787 Points +41%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (1613 - 3160, n=3)	2250 Points +14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1161 - 4632, n=11, last 2 years)	2165 Points +10%
GPD Pocket 4	2054 Points +4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	1976 Points
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	1704 Points -14%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	1225 Points -38%
Seq Read
GPD Pocket 4	5293.31 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	5107.56 MB/s +4%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	4909 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (4666 - 4909, n=3)	4820 MB/s -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (193.2 - 5643, n=12, last 2 years)	3832 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3524 MB/s -28%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	2601 MB/s -47%
Seq Write
GPD Pocket 4	4532.38 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	4479 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (3184 - 4479, n=3)	3629 MB/s -19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (80.9 - 5416, n=12, last 2 years)	3020 MB/s -33%
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	2264.42 MB/s -49%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2084 MB/s -53%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	1397 MB/s -69%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	66.86 MB/s +45%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	64.6 MB/s +40%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (34 - 82.8, n=11, last 2 years)	58.9 MB/s +28%
GPD Pocket 4	58.86 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	47.5 MB/s +3%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (42.5 - 50.7, n=3)	46.4 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	46.1 MB/s
4K Write
GPD Pocket 4	200.12 MB/s +48%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	200 MB/s +48%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	167.9 MB/s +24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (90.7 - 218, n=11, last 2 years)	158.4 MB/s +17%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (117.1 - 202, n=3)	151.5 MB/s +12%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	135.5 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	106.87 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Read
GPD Pocket 4	2260.35 MB/s +32%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	1864 MB/s +9%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	1715 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	1653.06 MB/s -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (590 - 2260, n=11, last 2 years)	1590 MB/s -7%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (973 - 1715, n=3)	1313 MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	915 MB/s -47%
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2411 MB/s +73%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (885 - 3957, n=11, last 2 years)	1768 MB/s +27%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (1178 - 2636, n=3)	1735 MB/s +25%
GPD Pocket 4	1400.18 MB/s +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	1392 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	1370.24 MB/s -2%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	885 MB/s -36%
Access Time Read
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	0.142 ms * -468%
GPD Pocket 4	0.082 ms * -228%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.025 - 0.151, n=11, last 2 years)	0.082 ms * -228%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	0.068 ms * -172%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.03 ms * -20%
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (0.024 - 0.04, n=3)	0.02967 ms * -19%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	0.025 ms *
Access Time Write
Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (0.082 - 0.098, n=3)	0.088 ms * -5%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	0.084 ms *
GPD Pocket 4	0.065 ms * +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.016 - 0.084, n=11, last 2 years)	0.04055 ms * +52%
Lenovo Legion Go S SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	0.037 ms * +56%
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.022 ms * +74%
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	0.021 ms * +75%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

MSI Claw 8 AI+; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5845 (5515.38-5873.91)

图形卡

英特尔英特尔 Arc Graphics 140VClaw 8 的图形性能非常出色，在合成基准测试中名列我们对比组的前茅。不过，游戏性能当然更为重要，Lunar Lake 处理器在这方面的表现也非常出色。在我们的标准测试中，Claw 8 的表现仅次于价格更高的 GDP Pocket，但旧的爪被超越了 25%，而 ROG Ally X领先约 10%。在我们的测试中，《GTA V》在启动时不断崩溃，因此我们无法在此提供任何结果。除此之外，没有任何问题。无论是在长时间游戏还是在电池供电的情况下，它的游戏性能都完全稳定。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	93.9 pt
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V	91.7 pt
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	88.5 pt
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	87.1 pt
MSI Claw Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	86.5 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC	79.6 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	78.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S ^-1! AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	58 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	13828 Points +22%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13267 Points +17%
MSI Claw Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12205 Points +8%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	12043 Points +6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (8360 - 13828, n=13, last 2 years)	11914 Points +5%
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (10499 - 12772, n=21)	11322 Points 0%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	11316 Points

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	9971 Points
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6790 - 10476, n=22)	9621 Points -4%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	8775 Points -12%
MSI Claw Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8618 Points -14%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	8540 Points -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6580 - 9971, n=17, last 2 years)	8028 Points -19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	7971 Points -20%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	6580 Points -34%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	4118 Points
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (2955 - 4415, n=25)	3981 Points -3%
MSI Claw Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3491 Points -15%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3286 Points -20%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	3196 Points -22%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (2058 - 4118, n=17, last 2 years)	2970 Points -28%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	2866 Points -30%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	2058 Points -50%

3DMark 11 Performance		11827 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9075 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		4448 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		812 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		3289 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score		3267 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	980 Seconds * -79%
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (509 - 700, n=21)	583 Seconds * -7%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	546 Seconds *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (290 - 980, n=15, last 2 years)	454 Seconds * +17%
MSI Claw Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	437 Seconds * +20%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	385 Seconds * +29%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	365 Seconds * +33%
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	304 Seconds * +44%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go	327 Seconds *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (n=1last 2 years)	327 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	98 pt
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	93.2 pt
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	83.9 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC	75.3 pt
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	74.5 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 ^-2! AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	73.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M	59 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED ^-4! AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU	53.5 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	28.5 (23.4^min) fps
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	26.6 (22.1^min) fps -7%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	22.9 (19.3^min) fps -20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (11.5 - 28.5, n=13, last 2 years)	20.4 fps -28%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	19.8 (16.6^min) fps -31%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M	13.8 (11.7^min, 10.2^P1) fps -52%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	29.1 fps +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	28.7 fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	25.8 fps -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (13.5 - 29.1, n=14, last 2 years)	23 fps -20%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.3 fps -29%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M	18.1 fps -37%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	34.4 fps
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	32.5 fps -6%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	30 fps -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	28.3 fps -18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18.4 - 34.4, n=18, last 2 years)	26.6 fps -23%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25.4 fps -26%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M	19.9 fps -42%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU	18.4 fps -47%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	56.1 (18^min, 29.5^P1) fps
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	56.1 (42.7^min, 45.4^P1) fps 0%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	51.6 (35.6^min, 40.1^P1) fps -8%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	48.6 (29.1^min, 38.3^P1) fps -13%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	46 fps -18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30 - 56.1, n=18, last 2 years)	45.7 fps -19%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M	35.9 (10^min, 11.8^P1) fps -36%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU	30 fps -47%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	85 (75.3^min) fps +3%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	82.2 (57.3^min) fps
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	76.2 (68.4^min) fps -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30.8 - 85, n=18, last 2 years)	66.1 fps -20%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	63.6 (41.1^min) fps -23%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	60.4 (54.6^min) fps -27%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M	58.7 (50.9^min) fps -29%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	50.5 fps +57%
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	38.9 fps +21%
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	33.2 fps +3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (24.5 - 50.5, n=18, last 2 years)	32.6 fps +1%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	32.2 fps
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	27.6 fps -14%
Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M	26.5 fps -18%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V: Ø25.3 (23.7-26.2)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	0 game wont start
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	100.7	94	84.1	82.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	87.6	87.6	34.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	43.3	36.5	32.2
Strange Brigade (2018)	227	81.7	67.9	56.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	40.4	33.5	29.2	28.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)	46.8	37.4	31.4	28.5
F1 24 (2024)	85.7	76.2	59.5	20.1
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025)	18

排放与能源

噪音排放

手持设备的两个风扇启动相当快，尤其是在功率最大的模式下，但在游戏过程中，风扇的波动行为更令人担忧。在 30 瓦的手动模式下，该设备的噪音在 37.3-41.4 dB(A) 之间变化，尽管其 TDP 绝对不变。我们在AI模式（37/17 瓦）下也观察到了这种情况，但噪音范围在 33.4-37.3 dB(A)之间。测试期间，测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		24.7 / 24.7 / 28.9 dB(A)
Load		37.3 / 41.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A)

	MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02	Lenovo Legion Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N	GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02	Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3	ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
Noise		-5%	-7%	-3%	-9%	5%	1%
off / environment *	24.7	25.6 -4%	22.8 8%	24.7 -0%	25.7 -4%	24.7 -0%	24.4 1%
Idle Minimum *	24.7	25.6 -4%	25.8 -4%	24.7 -0%	25.7 -4%	25 -1%	24.4 1%
Idle Average *	24.7	25.6 -4%	25.8 -4%	24.7 -0%	31.7 -28%	25 -1%	24.4 1%
Idle Maximum *	28.9	28.37 2%	31 -7%	28.5 1%	31.7 -10%	25 13%	30.6 -6%
Load Average *	37.3		47 -26%	42.6 -14%	36.6 2%	31.3 16%	36 3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	41.4	43.1 -4%	43.3 -5%	42.6 -3%	45.5 -10%
Load Maximum *	41.4	48.5 -17%	45.1 -9%	42.6 -3%	45.5 -10%	40.8 1%	39.3 5%

* ... smaller is better

温度

其表面温度总体很低，尤其是手持设备的手柄几乎不会发热。热空气从设备顶部排出。在压力测试期间，各 TDP 值保持不变。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


36.6 °C	35 °C	34.7 °C
35.7 °C	34.9 °C	34.6 °C
35 °C	35.3 °C	33.6 °C

Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 35 °C


29.5 °C	34.8 °C	28.4 °C
28.7 °C	34.5 °C	28.7 °C
28.3 °C	30.4 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 30.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 44.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


26.3 °C	26.8 °C	26.1 °C
26.4 °C	26.5 °C	26.4 °C
27.5 °C	27 °C	26.4 °C

Maximum: 27.5 °C
Average: 26.6 °C


27.1 °C	27.1 °C	27.2 °C
25.7 °C	26.2 °C	26.5 °C
24.5 °C	25.3 °C	24.7 °C

Maximum: 27.2 °C
Average: 26 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


35.8 °C	36.3 °C	34.7 °C
34.9 °C	34.5 °C	34.5 °C
34.7 °C	35 °C	33.2 °C

Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 34.8 °C


27.8 °C	34.3 °C	27.6 °C
27.2 °C	34 °C	28.1 °C
26.9 °C	29.2 °C	27.4 °C

Maximum: 34.3 °C
Average: 29.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 44.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31.6 °C / 89 F for the devices in the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 38.4 °C / 101 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 38 °C / 100 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.6 °C / 89 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31.6 °C / 89 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 30.5 °C / 86.9 F (-4.8 °C / -8.6 F).

	MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M	GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Heat		-9%	1%	-8%	-14%
Maximum Upper Side *	36.6	40 -9%	33.8 8%	42.7 -17%	41.8 -14%
Maximum Bottom *	34.8	35.5 -2%	35.2 -1%	39.7 -14%	35.9 -3%
Idle Upper Side *	27.5	32.5 -18%	26.6 3%	28 -2%	31.6 -15%
Idle Bottom *	27.2	29.2 -7%	28.6 -5%	27.2 -0%	33.6 -24%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

该设备的两个立体声扬声器非常出色，与旧款微星爪机相比再次得到了改进。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI Claw 8 AI+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Go S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

GPD Pocket 4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 22% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Ally X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

MSI Claw audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量

尽管 Claw 8 的显示屏更大，但它在空闲时比前一代产品和其他竞争对手更加节俭。我们在压力测试中测得的最大耗电量为 59 瓦，约一分钟后耗电量降至 50 瓦。游戏时，我们测得的功耗约为 46 瓦。因此，随附的 65 瓦插入式电源（重 192 克）大小适中。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.46 / 0.48 Watt
Idle	3.2 / 6.3 / 6.6 Watt
Load	40.6 / 59.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 8"	Lenovo Legion Go S Z2 Go, Radeon 680M, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N, IPS-Grade, 1920x1200, 8"	GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"	Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"	MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"	Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4"	ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Power Consumption		-41%	-28%	-19%	-60%	-1%	-42%
Idle Minimum *	3.2	5.3 -66%	6 -88%	4.3 -34%	7.8 -144%	4.5 -41%	6.66 -108%
Idle Average *	6.3	9.4 -49%	8.8 -40%	6.7 -6%	11.5 -83%	7.21 -14%	7.11 -13%
Idle Maximum *	6.6	15.5 -135%	9.2 -39%	7.5 -14%	11.8 -79%	9.66 -46%	11.7 -77%
Load Average *	40.6		53.1 -31%	48.2 -19%	53.1 -31%	22.86 44%	46.708 -15%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	47	47.6 -1%	50.1 -7%	61.3 -30%	54.4 -16%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	46.7	45.4 3%	45.7 2%	53.9 -15%
Load Maximum *	59.3	57.8 3%	56.4 5%	66.8 -13%	64.6 -9%	27.8 53%	56.7 4%
Witcher 3 ultra *							53.1

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

MSI Claw 8 AI+; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø53.2 (46.8-59.3)

MSI Claw 8 AI+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.04 (4.85-5.48)

MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø47 (43.3-51.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

MSI Claw 8 AI+; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø51 (44.8-58)

MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø53.1 (22.1-55.1)

MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø21.3 (20.2-43.7)

MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø55.1 (53.9-55.8)

MSI Claw 8 AI+; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø38.2 (36.8-47.4)

MSI Claw 8 AI+; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.6 (5.39-6.75)

MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø46.7 (44.1-53.5)

运行时间

微星将手持设备的电池容量提高到了 80 Wh，再加上其较低的消耗值，因此运行时间非常出色。游戏时，这在很大程度上取决于所选的能耗模式：在我们的测试中，在最快模式下，《赛博朋克》运行了 01:45 小时（约 25fps），而在人工智能引擎模式下，仅运行了不到 3.5 小时（约 19fps）。

在 150 cd/m²（测试设备最大亮度的 29%）条件下进行的普通 WLAN 测试中，我们测得的运行时间接近 24 小时，即使在全亮度条件下，运行时间也超过了 16.5 小时（均为 60 Hz），这都是非常长的运行时间。

Battery Runtime


Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd		1h 45min
WiFi Websurfing		23h 33min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		16h 37min

	MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 Wh	Lenovo Legion Go S Z2 Go, Radeon 680M, 55.5 Wh	GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 45 Wh	Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh	MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 53 Wh	Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, 50 Wh	ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 65 Wh	Average of class Handheld / UMPC
Battery Runtime		-33%	-74%	-8%	-48%	-60%	-54%	-59%
WiFi v1.3	1413	518 -63%	373 -74%	949 -33%	466 -67%	559 -60%	648 -54%	575 ?(326 - 1413, n=14, last 2 years) -59%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd	105	102 -3%		124 18%	76 -28%
Gaming						252		129.2 ?(74 - 252, n=5, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra							72	86.5 ?(72 - 101, n=2, last 2 years)

Notebookcheck 总评分

Back to the verdict

MSI Claw 8 AI+ - 03/06/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

87 / 98 → 89%

Mechanical Inputs

71%

Pointing Device

100%

Connectivity

69 / 68 → 100%

Weight

78 / 69-83 → 67%

Battery

93%

Display

81%

Games Performance

57 / 75 → 75%

Application Performance

84 / 92 → 92%

Temperature

92%

Noise

83%

Audio

89 / 91 → 97%

Average

64%

85%

Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
84.4%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 32.8%

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M	581
Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V	582
Acer Aspire 14 AI N24Q14 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V	584
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	590
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V	597
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU	598
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V	600
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Gigabyte P55W v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11778
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	11801
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M	11820
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V	11827
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	11828
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	11842
Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	11845
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

结论 - MSI Claw 8 AI+ 是最好的游戏掌上电脑之一，但也非常昂贵

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

可能的替代品比较

Table of Contents

规格

外壳和连接

尺寸比较

可持续性

软件 - MSI Center M

输入设备 - 霍尔效应触发器和摇杆

显示屏 - 8 英寸 IPS，120 赫兹刷新率和 VRR

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Lunar Lake 处理器

测试条件

处理器 - Core Ultra 7 258V

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

排放与能源

噪音排放

温度

发言人

MSI Claw 8 AI+ audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Go S audio analysis

GPD Pocket 4 audio analysis

Asus ROG Ally X audio analysis

MSI Claw audio analysis

Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED audio analysis

ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 audio analysis

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Notebookcheck 总评分

More articles related to this device

Transparency