Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar
一年前，华硕推出了首款游戏掌上电脑 ROG Ally.现在，我们获得了名为 ROG Ally X 的升级版本，它再次配备了相同的 AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme 处理器以及带 VRR 的 7 英寸 IPS 屏幕。不过，与最初的 Ally 相比，所有其他方面都有所改进。最重要的升级包括改进了人体工学设计、增大了电池容量，以及由于采用了更快的内存而提高了性能。
该产品仅有 899 欧元（799 美元）的 SKU，因此零售价比原来的 ROG Ally 高出 100 欧元（100 美元）。除了更大的 80 瓦时电池外，华硕还增加了 24 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD 存储空间。我们想知道 ROG Ally X 是否真的有所改进，或者你是否应该抓紧时间购买原版 ROG Ally，它的售价已经低于 600 欧元（Ally X 上市后可能会进一步下降）。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.6 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 685 g | 36.9 mm | 7.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 76.9 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | GPD Win Mini G1617-01 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | 526 g | 26 mm | 7.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 77.4 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 672 g | 33 mm | 7.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | 640 g | 49 mm | 7.40" | 1280x800 | |
| 84.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 845 g | 41 mm | 8.80" | 2560x1600 | |
| 85.2 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 942 g | 22 mm | 8.40" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 611 g | 21.22 mm | 7.00" | 1920x1080 |
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
外壳 - 手柄更大，更舒适
机身设计方面有两大不同。最引人注目的是颜色，因为新款 Ally X 不再使用白色机身，而是采用了黑色。这既不好也不坏，只是品味问题。黑色表面不易沾染指纹，这是好事。第二个新方面是更大的手柄。原来的 ROG Ally是相对扁平的，使用一段时间后会让人感到厌烦，尤其是对于手掌较大的人来说。现在，新款 ROG Ally X 的手柄加厚了，握起来更加舒适，尤其是在长时间的游戏过程中。手柄背面印有小巧的 ROG 字样，提高了操作性。
从质量上看，ROG Ally X 的塑料机箱依然坚固耐用。我们可以听到轻微的吱吱声，但在使用设备时不会出现这种情况，也不会有任何扭曲。包装盒内有两个黑色硬纸板小支架，可以很好地将 Ally X 固定在桌面上。
华硕尽可能减轻重量，以弥补 80 瓦时电池的不足。新版 ROG Ally 的重量为 685 克，而原版 ROG Ally 为 611 克。在直接对比中，这一点很明显，但我们很快就适应了额外的重量，完全没有感到困扰。65W PSU 重 224 克。
由于手柄较厚，ROG Ally X 需要在包里放更多空间，携带起来也不那么方便。不过，由于改善了人体工学设计，我们对这一妥协感到非常满意。
连接性 - 现在的游戏手持设备配备 USB 4.0
华硕取消了 XG Mobile 连接器，取而代之的是两个标准 USB-C 端口。其中一个支持 4.0 标准，因此可用于外置 GPU。这意味着，新的 ROG Ally X 作为一台普通电脑连接到一台带电源传输功能的显示器，用途更广泛，也更有趣。这在 ROG Ally 上也同样适用，但现在可以连接额外的硬盘或 USB 加密狗等。电源按钮也是指纹扫描仪，但没有网络摄像头。
SD 读卡器
microSD 读卡器（弹簧装置）位于顶部，使用我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）时，最高传输速率可达 260 MB/s（复制文件时降至 90 MB/s）。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI Claw (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (20.9 - 184, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro v60) | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro v60) | |
| MSI Claw (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (84.6 - 260, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
交流
Wi-Fi 模块也没有改变，这意味着 Ally X 不支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准。不过，这并不是一个大问题，联发科模块（Wi-Fi 6E）仍能提供出色而稳定的传输速率。在评测期间，我们还流畅地玩了一些游戏，没有出现任何连接中断的情况。
| Networking | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| MSI Claw | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
维护
拆卸新款 ROG Ally X 的后盖非常简单，但要注意连接背面附加按钮和主板的单根带状电缆。您应该用镊子小心地将其取下。好消息是，你不必拆卸线缆就能访问新的 M.2-2280 固态硬盘。与之前的 M.2-2230 固态硬盘相比，新的外形尺寸还允许进行简单而廉价的升级，并能获得更大的存储容量。
输入设备 - 改进了操纵杆和 D-pad
除了电容式触摸屏（采用康宁大猩猩玻璃）外，游戏手持设备显然还需要良好的按键和操纵杆。华硕更换了一些组件，你会立即注意到操纵杆的阻力增加了，从而可以在零位附近进行更精确的移动。D-pad 也经过重新设计，使用起来感觉更好。不过，我们对新的触发器（又是霍尔效应）并不完全放心。与原来的 ROG Ally 相比，它的阻力实际上更小了，这可能会在最初的几毫米内增加使用难度（在赛车游戏中尤其明显），而且松开扳机时的噪音也更大了一些。这显然也是个人喜好的问题，我们在游戏过程中没有遇到任何问题。所有其他按钮的手感都差不多。操纵杆周围的圆环可以再次发光（也取决于屏幕内容）。
您可以在 Armoury Crate SE 软件中对控制进行全面定制。首先是简单的按键映射，然后是操纵杆的反应曲线、死区、触发器的行程（左/右分别）、振动（左/右分别）和陀螺仪控制。这已经非常不错了，但最重要的是，你可以为每款游戏单独定制和存储所有这些功能。
背面的两个附加按钮现在小了很多。但它们仍能与 D-pad 和按键一起激活有用的功能（如显示桌面、截图、笔式任务管理器）。不过，在带有一些按钮和操纵杆的小型触摸屏上使用 Windows 系统仍然相当麻烦，尤其是初始设置可能会非常恼人。我们建议尽可能简化设置，使用鼠标/键盘，甚至是带电源传输和附加输入设备的外接屏。一切就绪后，你就可以专注于 Armoury Crate SE 软件了，这也是下一部分的重点。
软件 - Armoury Crate SE 1.5
一切安装和配置完成后，Armoury Crate SE 软件就成了您游戏的主要枢纽。ROG Ally X 配备的是 1.5 版本的软件（ROG Ally 将在晚些时候获得更新），其设计可与触摸屏和手持按键配合使用。除了游戏库，你还可以管理所有设置。通过 Steam、Origin 等常用启动器安装的游戏会自动添加到游戏库中，但也可以手动添加游戏。该软件可以在设备启动时自动启动，因此你可以在大多数情况下忽略 Windows。
我们已经讨论过控件的全面自定义选项，但 Armoury Crate SE 软件并没有止步于此。就像操控一样，你可以为每款游戏设置性能配置文件（包括电源和电池），还可以通过 Radeon GPU 驱动程序调整 GPU 设置，而无需使用 Radeon 软件。
屏幕左侧下方的按钮可随时打开 "命令中心"，该中心可配置 15 个选项（共 23 个选项）。这是一种超级简便舒适的方式，可用于调整电源配置文件、亮度、音量、分辨率、GPU 选项或操纵杆照明环亮度等重要设置。
其中一个选项是实时监控，有三种不同的设置：最小化、线条和方框。每个选项都会增加屏幕上显示的数据数量，并显示所有重要的性能数据。FPS 监测器非常可靠（上一代机型就已经有），当你试图为自己喜欢的游戏找到合适的设置时，它能提供极大的帮助。我们更喜欢带有当前时间、电池电量、系统总耗电量和 FPS 数值的最小选项。上面的图片显示了所有版本，它们可以在屏幕上自由移动。
显示屏 - 仍为 7 英寸 IPS，带 VRR
7 英寸 IPS 屏幕没有任何变化，整体图像质量非常好。Steam Deck 的 OLED 面板 蒸汽甲板的 OLED 面板可能略胜一筹，但 Ally X 的面板则提供了 VRR（可变刷新率），这在玩帧数相对较低的游戏时是一个很大的改进。总之，120 Hz IPS 屏幕的快速响应时间对于游戏来说仍然是一个非常不错的选择。现在还有 PWM 功能，华硕还将最低亮度从 25 cd/m² 降低到 10 cd/m²，这在黑暗环境中很有帮助。
广告宣传的亮度仍为 500 尼特，但我们的评测机平均亮度为 456 尼特，稍暗一些。看起来我们的设备采用了较弱的面板，而去年的 ROG Ally(面板 ID 相同）则略微亮一些。黑色值为 0.35 cd/m²，最大对比度接近 1400:1。屏幕不支持 HDR 内容，也没有亮度或色温自动控制功能。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 484 cd/m²
Contrast: 1383:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Asus ROG Ally X TL070FVXS01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | GPD Win Mini G1617-01 TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | MSI Claw TL070FVXS02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED ANX7530 U, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4", 90 Hz | Lenovo Legion Go Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz | Ayaneo Kun Ayaneo 2K, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4", 60 Hz | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 1% | 32% | 26% | 27% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.2 | 64.8 -2% | 67 1% | 99.6 50% | 92.1 39% | 93.52 41% | 65.6 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.4 | 93.3 0% | 94.4 1% | 100 7% | 99.56 7% | 99.4 6% | 92.1 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.5 | 67 -2% | 69.4 1% | 96.1 40% | 90.09 32% | 91.2 33% | 67.9 -1% |
| Response Times | -2% | -6% | -26% | -134% | -167% | -7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 9.7 ? | 8.9 ? 8% | 9.2 ? 5% | 9 ? 7% | 20.8 ? -114% | 24.2 ? -149% | 10.5 ? -8% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 5.7 ? | 6.3 ? -11% | 6.6 ? -16% | 9 ? -58% | 14.4 ? -153% | 16.2 ? -184% | 6 ? -5% |
| PWM Frequency | 360 ? | 700 | 20000 | ||||
| Screen | -2% | 6% | 162% | -30% | -10% | -8% | |
| Brightness middle | 484 | 493 2% | 477 -1% | 485 0% | 411 -15% | 680 40% | 513 6% |
| Brightness | 456 | 470 3% | 461 1% | 482 6% | 413 -9% | 678 49% | 474 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 88 0% | 98 11% | 80 -9% | 91 3% | 84 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.47 -34% | 0.32 9% | 0.03 91% | 0.42 -20% | 0.5 -43% | 0.38 -9% |
| Contrast | 1383 | 1049 -24% | 1491 8% | 16167 1069% | 979 -29% | 1360 -2% | 1350 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 2.36 19% | 2.6 10% | 2 31% | 5.94 -105% | 4 -38% | 3.7 -28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 6.36 10% | 5.8 18% | 5 30% | 10.56 -49% | 9 -27% | 8.3 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.4 | 1.3 7% | 1.5 -7% | 2.95 -111% | 1 29% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.4 2% | 3.9 13% | 2 56% | 0.92 80% | 9 -100% | 5.1 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.17 101% | 2 110% | 1.93 114% | 2 110% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 7534 86% | 7142 91% | 7250 90% | 6336 103% | 8064 81% | 7188 90% | 7732 84% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-2% | 0% /
3% | 56% /
103% | -46% /
-33% | -50% /
-24% | -5% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
华硕并没有为 ROG Ally X 提供色彩配置文件，出厂设置显示出明显的偏蓝和冷色温，但色彩偏差尚可。这种组合有助于最大限度地提高亮度。你几乎不会在小屏幕上编辑任何图片，因此情况并不理想，但这并不像在较大的笔记本电脑屏幕上那么重要。我们自己的校准（配置文件链接在上面的框中，可免费下载）明显改善了画质，但中心的最大亮度因此从 484 尼特下降到 434 尼特。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 9.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8799 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Ally X 的触摸屏是光面的，但在户外使用这款小设备很容易找到合适的位置。根据我们自己使用原版 ROG Ally 的经验，我们可以说，只要避免阳光直射，在明亮的日子里玩游戏还是很舒适的。在视角稳定性方面没有任何问题。
性能 - AMD Zen4，内存速度更快
新款 ROG Ally X 仍使用 AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme集成 Radeon 780M.不过，华硕改变了内存配置：不再使用 16GB LPDDR5-6400 内存，而是 24GB 更快的 LPDDR5x-7500 内存。默认情况下，24 GB 中的 8 GB 分配给 iGPU，其余 16 GB 用于系统。
审查设置
华硕为 ROG Ally X 调整了我们熟悉的电源配置文件，安静模式（10 至 13 瓦）和性能模式（15 至 17 瓦）的 SoC 消耗都较高。Turbo 模式的电源功耗仍为 30 瓦，电池功耗仍为 25 瓦。请注意，这些数值表示 APU 的持续功耗，但 Ryzen 芯片在短时间内的功耗可能更高。我们在下表中总结了功耗曲线和性能数据：
| 功率曲线 | APU TDP | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | CP 2077 1080p Med | 最大风扇噪音 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 安静 | 15/13 W | 8446 pt | 1840 pt | 16.3 FPS | 32.2 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 29/24/17 W | 12254 pt | 2800 pt | 26.4 FPS | 33.8 dB(A) |
| 涡轮增压（电池） | 35/30/25 W | 13425 pt | 3017 pt | 31.1 FPS | 37.4 dB(A) |
| 涡轮 | 53/43/30 W | 15120 Pkt. | 3196 pt | 34.3 FPS | 42.6 dB(A) |
在进行基准测试和测量时，我们默认使用主电源的 Turbo 模式，这样可以获得最佳性能。在游戏基准测试中，超级分辨率、流畅运动帧等所有附加功能都被关闭，但我们也会在游戏部分介绍这些功能。
处理器 - Ryzen Z1 Extreme
AMD 的 Ryzen Z1 Extreme(基本上是 Ryzen 7 7840U)拥有 8 个 Zen4 内核（16 个线程），最高主频为 5.1 GHz。它仍然是一款功能强大的移动处理器，其性能比 酷睿至尊 7 155H更强。 微星的 Claw掌上电脑。总之，基准测试结果非常好，持续工作负载下的性能下降非常小，约为 10%。与原来的 ROG Ally相比也有细微差别，这并不奇怪。在电池供电的 Turbo 模式下，由于最大 TDP 较低，CPU 多核性能在不使用 PSU 的情况下降低了约 11%。其他 CPU 基准测试请参见 我们的技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go -2! | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -6! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (13004 - 15120, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3984 - 15120, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (1733 - 1779, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1597 - 1770, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (5109 - 5825, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1521 - 5917, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (672 - 692, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (357 - 684, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (2050 - 2397, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (689 - 2439, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (262 - 280, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (246 - 268, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (208 - 315, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (213 - 214, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (56966 - 64454, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19684 - 64454, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (6077 - 6316, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3653 - 6077, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (10872 - 12026, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4587 - 12026, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (2530 - 2550, n=4) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1348 - 2550, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (9589 - 10917, n=4) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4457 - 10713, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (1896 - 1956, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1355 - 1917, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (16.3 - 18.7, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (12.5 - 18.7, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (46.2 - 57.8, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (43 - 52.3, n=3) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.4601 - 0.4945, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (0.4447 - 0.4662, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (20714 - 24519, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (10795 - 25901, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (86738 - 103637, n=3) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (58068 - 109745, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (3854 - 4465, n=3) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (2707 - 4847, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (95153 - 107867, n=3) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (69419 - 114294, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (12936 - 14281, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (8463 - 14822, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (46180 - 55457, n=3) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (28245 - 58482, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (57678 - 166333, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (57678 - 80158, n=3) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (687 - 987, n=3) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (654 - 1047, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (10740 - 13049, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5732 - 13846, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (34764 - 39932, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (26622 - 49287, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
系统性能
ROG Ally X 具备不带 dGPU 的现代超极本/笔记本电脑的性能，可以轻松用作迷你电脑甚至是主要设备，尤其是在结合外接屏幕和连接输入设备的情况下。基准测试结果非常好，我们在评测期间没有遇到任何稳定性问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (6439 - 7149, n=3) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5866 - 7149, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (10081 - 10633, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (9068 - 10633, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (8996 - 10074, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7323 - 9912, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (7990 - 9408, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7204 - 9408, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (1693 - 1718, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (840 - 1693, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (1639 - 1662, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (874 - 1649, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (1868 - 1878, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (808 - 1868, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (1392 - 1451, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (831 - 1538, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 432, n=3) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (188.4 - 306, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (248 - 277, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (107 - 255, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (516 - 931, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (536 - 556, n=2) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7149 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (74414 - 92447, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (32617 - 81717, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (50337 - 58713, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25380 - 80481, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (92869 - 108872, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25596 - 108872, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (112.6 - 139.6, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (113.7 - 122.1, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
我们的标准化延迟测试（网页浏览、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）显示，当你想使用实时音频应用程序时，采用当前 BIOS 版本的评测机存在一些限制。不过，对于游戏手持设备来说，这种情况并不常见。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
新款 ROG Ally X 配备了通过 PCIe 4.0 连接的普通 M.2-2280 固态硬盘。它默认配备 1 TB 硬盘，我们的硬盘由 Western Digital（SN560）提供。初始设置后，您可以使用 891 GB 来存储自己的文件/应用程序。传输速率不错，只是在持续工作负荷下性能会略有下降。如果你有一个全面的游戏库，很容易升级硬盘。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 -11! | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -11! | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能 - Radeon 780M
AMD 的 Radeon 780M与去年的 ROG Ally，但更快的内存带来了不同。结果是我们迄今测试过的最快的 Radeon 780M。这意味着 Radeon iGPU 仍略逊于 英特尔弧形显卡的 微星魔爪Time Spy 测试中略逊于英特尔 Arc Graphics，但在整体性能评级中却遥遥领先。Ally X 通常也领先于 AMD 的其他对手。
我们已经说过，8 GB 内存现在默认分配给 GPU，但你也可以手动调整这个值。此外，还有超级分辨率、流体运动帧、Radeon chill 等驱动程序选项，可直接从 Armoury Crate SE 软件中访问，这些选项可针对每款游戏单独配置，无需使用 Radeon 软件。
Turbo 模式会降低对电池电量的消耗，因此 GPU 的最大电池性能也会受到影响。不过，差异很小，仅为 6%。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13368 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8172 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3507 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 519 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2972 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (332 - 517, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=48) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
这是游戏掌上电脑最重要的部分。我们显然进行了标准的游戏基准测试，ROG Ally X 在对比排行榜上名列前茅，而且还领先于 微星魔爪英特尔 CPU。根据不同的游戏，性能会有细微差别，但总体游戏性能还是非常不错的。
我们有两台 ROG Ally X 的评测机，两位编辑（经常使用原版 ROG Ally）都认为性能配置文件代表了性能/功耗/风扇噪音之间的最佳折衷。这是由于功耗限制略有增加，但由于内存更多/更快，性能也有所提高。我们想举两个具体的例子：在 1080p 和中等设置下，《极限竞速地平线 5》需要使用 Turbo 模式才能达到稳定的 60 fps。新版 Ally X 可以通过性能配置文件实现这一目标，这在风扇噪音和电池寿命方面带来了巨大的改变。对马幽灵》（1080p、中等设置、FSR + FG）也是如此：以前我们必须使用 "涡轮增压 "模式，现在我们可以使用 "性能 "模式。
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| MSI Claw -1! | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 -1! | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -3! | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (17.5 - 33.9, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18.6 - 27.1, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ROG Ally X (1.3) | |
| Ayaneo Kun (1.3) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (1.3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go (1.3) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18.4 - 30, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw (1.3) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 (1.3) | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED (1.3) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Ayaneo Kun (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30 - 51.6, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (55 - 78.7, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (24.5 - 38.9, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win Mini G1617-01 | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| F1 23 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (42.4 - 95.4, n=30) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (43.2 - 95.4, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (38.1 - 84.4, n=30) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (38.6 - 84.4, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (27.3 - 61.1, n=31) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (27.3 - 61.1, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (6.25 - 14.7, n=22) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6.25 - 14.6, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (43.3 - 94.8, n=12) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (43.3 - 91.5, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (36.4 - 80.1, n=12) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (37.1 - 78.3, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (23.3 - 59.5, n=12) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (27.1 - 57.7, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (6.39 - 14.5, n=9) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6.39 - 14.5, n=5, last 2 years) | |
一旦 TDP 达到指定值，游戏性能就会完全稳定。从下图中我们可以清楚地看到这一点，图中列出了我们在 30 分钟赛博朋克测试中使用三种不同电源配置文件时的 FPS 数值。所有数据都显示性能略有下降，但之后性能保持稳定。电池电量也是如此。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
除了 "涡轮增压 "模式，我们还使用所有其他电源配置文件进行了游戏基准测试。如果你玩的是现代高要求游戏，如《赛 博 朋克 2077》、《对马之鬼》或《博德之门 3》，"加速 "模式会让你在流畅游戏和糟糕体验之间做出选择。总而言之，性能模式也能达到不错的帧数。而安静模式则明显较慢，需要额外调整设置。
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| GTA V | |
| 1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Strange Brigade | |
| 1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8 | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| F1 23 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Far Cry 5 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Ghost of Tsushima | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Dota 2 Reborn | |
| 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
此外，还可以通过附加功能提高游戏性能。例如，AMD 驱动程序提供了超级分辨率（从 720p 扩展到 1080p）和帧生成等功能。此外，还有 AMD 的 FSR 技术，但并非所有游戏都支持该技术。我们以《赛博朋克 2077》为例，介绍了 AMD 的所有功能，并通过游戏设置添加了 FSR 2.1。赛博朋克》在不久的将来也会支持 FSR 3。我们的结果清楚地表明，您可以显著提高游戏性能。对马之魂》就是一个例子，我们关闭了 AMD 驱动程序功能，并通过游戏设置使用 FSR 和帧生成功能。帧生成技术在这款游戏中的表现尤为出色，性能大幅提升，因此您可以在 1080p /High 的性能配置文件下以超过 40 帧/秒的速度进行游戏。得益于这些技术，ROG Ally X 可以轻松应对所有 AAA 级游戏。
| 功率曲线 | 1080p 低 | 1080p 中 | 1080p 高 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 性能（FSR 3） | 39.8 FPS | 33.4 FPS | 28.8 FPS |
| 性能（FSR 3 + FG） | 59.2 FPS | 52.9 FPS | 44.5 FPS |
| Turbo (FSR 3) | 42.9 FPS | 36 FPS | 31.4 FPS |
| Turbo (FSR 3 + FG) | 70.9 FPS | 61.6 FPS | 53.8 FPS |
| 功率曲线 | 中 | 高 | 超 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 性能 | 39.9 FPS | 33 FPS | 30.3 FPS |
| 性能 (FSR 2.1) | 59 FPS | 39.4 FPS | 35.5 FPS |
| Turbo | 52.4 FPS | 38 FPS | 35.3 FPS |
| Turbo (FSR 2.1) | 64 FPS | 44.2 FPS | 40.9 FPS |
下面的概览表显示了我们使用四种不同的电源配置文件进行的游戏基准测试。
Gaming Benchmarks Turbo (30 Watts)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 144.5 | 144 | 66.5 | 27.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 149 | 49 | 31.1 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 120.7 | 105.3 | 86.5 | 76.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 80.7 | 39.6 | 30 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 54 | 40.6 | 33.2 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 78 | 46 | 42 | 40 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 161.1 | 70.1 | 60 | 51.6 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 104 | 47 | 42 | 37 |
| Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 113 | 78 | 69 | 36 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 94.9 | 86.7 | 64.6 | 17.8 |
| Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 23.1 | 20.8 | 19.5 | 18.3 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 89.6 | 79 | 56.6 | 13 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 41.1 | 32.1 | 26.6 | 25.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 44.1 | 34.3 | 27.2 | 22.9 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 92.2 | 68 | 40.4 | 32 |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 68 | 57 | 38 | 37 |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 29.4 | 26 | 18.7 | 16.3 |
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 36.1 | 29.4 | 26.1 | 20.6 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 90.9 | 75.5 | 55.1 | 13.4 |
Gaming Benchmarks Turbo (25 Watts)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 141.1 | 137.9 | 65.8 | 26.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 47.1 | 29.6 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 114.3 | 93.9 | 86.9 | 71.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 77.9 | 38.2 | 28.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 39.3 | 27.1 | 28.2 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 72 | 45 | 41 | 39 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 163.6 | 68.1 | 58.1 | 50 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 100 | 46 | 40 | 35 |
| Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 106 | 74 | 62 | 32 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 85.5 | 76.4 | 53.8 | 12.1 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.2 | 30.4 | 25.3 | 25.1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.5 | 31.1 | 25.1 | 21.7 |
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 34.9 | 28.3 | 25.3 | 19.7 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 83.4 | 72.1 | 52.3 | 12.6 |
Gaming Benchmarks Performance (17 Watts)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 130.4 | 124.8 | 58.7 | 25.3 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 45.7 | 25.7 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 121.3 | 105.2 | 81.9 | 66.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 67 | 34.8 | 26.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 51.9 | 38.4 | 32.3 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 73 | 40 | 37 | 35 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 156.3 | 64.9 | 53.9 | 45.1 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 91 | 41 | 38 | 33 |
| Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 102 | 61 | 60 | 31 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 67.3 | 62.5 | 44.1 | 9.98 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 33 | 25.7 | 21.6 | 21.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 33.9 | 26.4 | 21.9 | 18.7 |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 52 | 39 | 29 | 27 |
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 33.3 | 24.6 | 21.4 | 16.7 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 69 | 61.1 | 43.8 | 10.1 |
Gaming Benchmarks Quiet (13 Watts)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 121 | 100.6 | 41.4 | 18.6 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 27.5 | 17.5 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 116.4 | 102.4 | 61.1 | 55 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44.7 | 24 | 19.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 48.7 | 35.6 | 30.3 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 47 | 25 | 23 | 22 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 141 | 46.2 | 38.8 | 32.8 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 61 | 27 | 24 | 21 |
| Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 66 | 39 | 35 | 19 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 43.2 | 38.6 | 27.3 | 6.25 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 20.2 | 15.7 | 13.8 | 13.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 32.6 | 16.3 | 13.8 | 11.5 |
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 10.6 | 16.5 | 14.6 | 11.8 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 43.3 | 37.1 | 27.1 | 6.39 |
排放 - 只有涡轮增压模式（30 瓦）声音大
系统噪音
在空闲和轻度工作负载（浏览网页、YouTube 作为台式电脑）时，两个风扇通常是关闭的，也没有多余的电子声。当你开始对系统施加压力时，这完全取决于电源配置文件。主电源上的 Turbo 模式就是一个反面教材，在安静的游戏场景中会产生 43 分贝（A）的噪音。而在电池供电的 Turbo 模式下，噪音已经悦耳得多，在使用性能模式时，只有低沉的杂音（或根本没有游戏音效）。
| 功率曲线 | 3DMark 06 | 赛博朋克 2077 | 压力测试 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 静音 | 32.2 dB(A) | 32.2 dB(A) | 32.2 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 33.8 dB(A) | 33.8 dB(A) | 33.8 dB(A) |
| 涡轮增压（电池） | 37.4 dB(A) | 37.4 dB(A) | 37.4 dB(A) |
| 涡轮 | 42.6 dB(A) | 42.6 dB(A) | 42.6 dB(A) |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 28.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 42.6 / 42.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | GPD Win Mini G1617-01 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G | MSI Claw Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02 | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3 | Lenovo Legion Go Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | Ayaneo Kun Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -7% | 7% | 10% | -5% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 24.7 | 24.2 2% | 25.7 -4% | 24.7 -0% | 23 7% | 23.3 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 24.7 -0% | 25.7 -4% | 25 -1% | 23 7% | 25.31 -2% | 23.3 6% |
| Idle Average * | 24.7 | 26.2 -6% | 31.7 -28% | 25 -1% | 23 7% | 25.31 -2% | 23.3 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.5 | 28 2% | 31.7 -11% | 25 12% | 25 12% | 34.5 -21% | 27.3 4% |
| Load Average * | 42.6 | 34.2 20% | 36.6 14% | 31.3 27% | 37 13% | 34.9 18% | 39.2 8% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 42.6 | 45.5 -7% | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 42.6 | 42.5 -0% | 45.5 -7% | 40.8 4% | 37 13% | 50.78 -19% | 39.2 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 46 | 39.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于表面温度没有问题，所以我们可以长话短说。游戏时触摸屏确实会发热，但手柄几乎不会发热，这在热敏图像上也很容易看到。顶部的风扇排气也没有问题，整个背面都非常凉爽。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 38.5 °C / 101 F, ranging from 28 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 37.4 °C / 99 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 34.2 °C / 94 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 31.9 °C / 89.4 F (-10.3 °C / -18.6 F).
| Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M | GPD Win Mini G1617-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M | MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M | Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -18% | -6% | -3% | ||||
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42.7 | 46.6 -9% | 41.8 2% | 44.4 -4% | |||
| Maximum Bottom * | 39.7 | 48 -21% | 35.9 10% | 37.9 5% | |||
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 32.6 -16% | 31.6 -13% | 29.9 -7% | |||
| Idle Bottom * | 27.2 | 33.6 -24% | 33.6 -24% | 28.3 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器位于机身前部，表现出色。与最初的 ROG Ally.新 Ally X 的性能仅次于 Steam Deck OLED击败。
Asus ROG Ally X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 25% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
GPD Win Mini G1617-01 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI Claw audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Go audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Ayaneo Kun audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 现配备 80 Wh 超大容量电池
耗电量
ROG Ally X 的空闲耗电量与旧版相比略高。 ROG Ally相比略高，但这款 7 英寸手持设备仍然是最高效的设备之一。游戏时的能耗取决于电源配置文件，这在下面的图片和下表中可以看到。我们是在 APU 达到预期功耗后拍摄这些图片的（游戏开始时的数值较高）。
| 功率曲线 | 功率消耗 APS | 功率消耗系统 |
|---|---|---|
| Leise | 13 瓦 | ~19-20 瓦 |
| Leistung | 17 瓦特 | 25.5-26.5 瓦特 |
| Turbo Akku | 25 瓦 | 35-36 瓦 |
| Turbo | 30 瓦特 | 42-43 瓦特 |
| 云游戏 | 8 瓦 | 11-12 瓦 |
Ally X 的实时监控不仅显示了 APU 的消耗，还显示了系统的总消耗，这对电池寿命是一个很好的指标。云游戏时的消耗数据也很有趣。我们通过 Xbox 游戏通行证测试了微软的《飞行模拟器 2020》，虽然在加载屏幕和菜单期间消耗量会相当大，但在实际游戏过程中，APU 的消耗量非常低，仅为 8 瓦（系统总消耗量为 11-12 瓦）。您还可以看到 iGPU 负载为 0%。在模拟游戏时，Ally X 的效率更高。我们玩了一些 SNES 经典游戏，如《超级马里奥》或《超级马里奥卡丁车》，系统总功耗在 8-9 瓦之间。
在压力测试中，我们测得的功耗高达 66.8 瓦，但很快就降到了 50 瓦左右。因此，随附的 65 瓦电源适配器刚好够用。
| Off / Standby | 0.48 / 0.73 Watt |
| Idle | 4.3 / 6.7 / 7.5 Watt |
| Load |
48.2 / 66.8 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | GPD Win Mini G1617-01 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4" | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 0% | -34% | 14% | -70% | -136% | 2% | -28% | -30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 6.1 -42% | 7.8 -81% | 4.5 -5% | 11.5 -167% | 14 -226% | 4.2 2% | 6.18 ? -44% | 7.47 ? -74% |
| Idle Average * | 6.7 | 7.9 -18% | 11.5 -72% | 7.21 -8% | 12 -79% | 17.56 -162% | 6.1 9% | 8.33 ? -24% | 9.5 ? -42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.5 | 9 -20% | 11.8 -57% | 9.66 -29% | 17.4 -132% | 27 -260% | 6.3 16% | 10.8 ? -44% | 12.7 ? -69% |
| Load Average * | 48.2 | 32.6 32% | 53.1 -10% | 22.86 53% | 45 7% | 38.1 21% | 56.6 -17% | 56.1 ? -16% | 38.3 ? 21% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 61.3 | 54.4 11% | |||||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 53.9 | ||||||||
| Load Maximum * | 66.8 | 34.9 48% | 64.6 3% | 27.8 58% | 54 19% | 101 -51% | 67.2 -1% | 75.5 ? -13% | 57 ? 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 33.3 | 42.6 | 83.5 | 64.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption external screen
电池运行时间
华硕将新款 ROG Ally 的电池容量翻了一番，从 40 Wh 增加到 80 Wh。我们已经看到了游戏过程中的消耗值，在 "涡轮增压 "模式下预计将略高于 2 小时，在 "高性能 "模式下约为 3 小时，在 "静音 "模式下约为 4 小时。我们的测试证实了这一点。在云游戏中，你可以获得 7 小时左右的时间，模拟游戏甚至可以达到 8 小时。这比原来的 ROG Ally的电池状态更加轻松。这意味着 Ally X 与 蒸汽甲板(同样是 2-4 小时，视设置而定。
在我们的默认电池测试中，Ally X 的表现也非常出色，将 80 Wh 的电池（比大多数笔记本电脑的电池容量还要大）与 7 英寸的小屏幕结合在一起，这一点也不足为奇。我们在 150 尼特（最大亮度的 43%）的 Wi-Fi 测试中，以 60 Hz 的频率运行了近 16 个小时，以 120 Hz 的频率运行了近 15 个小时。在最大亮度下，我们仍可分别使用约 12.5 小时（60 赫兹）和约 12 小时（120 赫兹）。以 150 尼特的亮度播放视频可持续 19.5 小时。
使用附带的 65 瓦适配器，设备开机后的充电时间为 128 分钟（53 分钟后可充电 50%，84 分钟后可充电 80%）。两个 USB-C 端口都支持高达 100 瓦的快速充电，据称可以缩短 0-50 % 的充电时间。显然，我们使用 100 瓦特的电源对这一说法进行了测试，可以确认充电速度更快，但电池电量也超过了 50%。充满电需要 93 分钟，只需 29 分钟就能达到 50%（51 分钟后达到 80%）。
| Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | GPD Win Mini G1617-01 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 44 Wh | MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 53 Wh | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, 50 Wh | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh | Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -35% | -47% | -41% | -62% | -49% | -52% | -41% | |
| H.264 | 1174 | 527 -55% | 568 -52% | 629 ? -46% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 949 | 518 -45% | 466 -51% | 559 -41% | 358 -62% | 602 -37% | 465 -51% | 557 ? -41% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 124 | 76 -39% | ||||||
| Load | 128 | 96 -25% | 76 -41% | 50 -61% | 82.6 ? -35% | |||
| Gaming | 252 | 97 | 122 | 136.3 ? | ||||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 101 | 57 | 86.5 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - ROG Ally X 是目前最好的游戏掌上电脑
最初的 ROG Ally 已经是一款非常出色的游戏手持设备，华硕利用新的 ROG Ally X 消除了第一款产品的缺点，尤其是在人体工学和电池寿命方面。新机箱的手柄更大，因此即使长时间游戏也会更加舒适。80 瓦特的大容量电池为长时间游戏提供了充足的电量，而经过调整的 "性能模式 "则是移动游戏的理想设置。你将不得不减少一些细节（尤其是现代 AAA 级游戏），但换来的是近 3 小时的运行时间和几乎听不到的风扇声。
AMD SoC 的 CPU 性能与以前基本相同，但 iGPU 得益于更快的内存，内存容量增加了 8 GB（8 GB 分配给 Radeon 780M，16 GB 分配给系统的其他部分）。得益于全面的 GPU 功能，你可以在 ROG Ally X 上流畅地游玩所有现代游戏。IPS 显示屏保持不变，120 Hz 和 VRR 等功能让它非常适合游戏。
性能更强，人体工学设计得到改善，电池续航时间更长：新款 ROG Ally X 在游戏掌上电脑中提供了最佳的整体解决方案，华硕设法解决了我们对原版 ROG Ally 的几乎所有抱怨。因此，899 欧元的较高零售价是合理的。
华硕几乎在每一个方面都对移动游戏玩家进行了改进，其整体配置目前很难被超越。除了上述优点外，您还可以获得一个普通的 M.2-2280 SSD，这使得 SSD 升级非常容易。现在还有两个 USB-C 端口，因此将 Ally X 用作小型 PC 就更加方便了。自推出最初的 ROG Ally 以来，软件实现不断改进，一切都运行得非常好。
缺点已经不多了。如果有网络摄像头就更好了，Wi-Fi 7 模块肯定已经列入下一代产品的待办事项清单。不过，我们对显示屏还不太确定，因为 IPS 面板非常适合游戏。OLED 屏幕可以改善画质，但必须放弃 VRR 等功能。IPS 屏幕的 PWM 也没有问题。处理器方面，我们很希望看到 AMD Zen5 APU，但这很可能会增加成本。我们还需要等待一周才能看到新芯片的实际性能。
在竞争对手中，新款 ROG Ally X 是最贵的机型之一，售价为 899 欧元（799 美元），但我们认为这是合理的。 微星的 Claw手持设备最近降至 749 欧元（约合 649 美元），但在许多方面根本没有那么好。蒸汽甲板 Steam Deck OLED仍然是一个强劲的竞争对手，但性能却低得多。像 Legion Go这样的设备只有在你必须拥有更大的屏幕时才有意义。对价格敏感的用户应该关注原版的 ROG Ally.它的价格已经低于 600 欧元，一旦 ROG Ally X 上架，价格很可能会进一步下降。你可以从节省下来的钱中拿出一小部分来购买大容量的移动电源，以增加电池的续航时间。
价格和供应情况
您可以从百思买以 799 美元的价格订购新款华硕 ROG Ally X。
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
Asus ROG Ally X
-
07/22/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
