Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

华硕 ROG Ally X 评测--凭借更快的内存和 80 Wh 超大电池,成为最佳游戏掌上电脑

各方面都更好,但也更贵。

新款华硕 ROG Ally X 是 ROG Ally 的升级版,仍然使用相同的 AMD 处理器和 7 英寸 IPS 面板,但几乎所有其他方面都有所改进。除了改进人体工学设计和更好的操纵杆外,这款游戏掌机还配备了额外的内存和更大的 80 Wh 电池。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AMD Gaming Handheld Touchscreen Windows Zen 4

一年前,华硕推出了首款游戏掌上电脑 ROG Ally.现在,我们获得了名为 ROG Ally X 的升级版本,它再次配备了相同的 AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme 处理器以及带 VRR 的 7 英寸 IPS 屏幕。不过,与最初的 Ally 相比,所有其他方面都有所改进。最重要的升级包括改进了人体工学设计、增大了电池容量,以及由于采用了更快的内存而提高了性能。

该产品仅有 899 欧元(799 美元)的 SKU,因此零售价比原来的 ROG Ally 高出 100 欧元(100 美元)。除了更大的 80 瓦时电池外,华硕还增加了 24 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD 存储空间。我们想知道 ROG Ally X 是否真的有所改进,或者你是否应该抓紧时间购买原版 ROG Ally,它的售价已经低于 600 欧元(Ally X 上市后可能会进一步下降)。

ROG Ally X Turbo 30W (ROG Ally Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme 8 x 3.3 - 5.1 GHz, 53 W PL2 / Short Burst, 30 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 780M, Core: 2700 MHz, RAM: 937 MHz, 23.40.28
Memory
24 GB 
, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
7.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 315 PPI, capacitive, TL070FVXS01-0, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, 120 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, 1024 GB 
, M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0, 891 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 36.9 x 280 x 111
Battery
80 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, 65W PSU, Armoury Crate, Xbox Game Pass Ultimate (3 months), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
685 g, Power Supply: 224 g
Price
899 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
84.6 %v8
07 / 2024
Asus ROG Ally X
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
685 g36.9 mm7.00"1920x1080
76.9 %v8
06 / 2024
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
R7 8840U, Radeon 780M
526 g26 mm7.00"1920x1080
77.4 %v8
06 / 2024
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
672 g33 mm7.00"1920x1080
88.9 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
640 g49 mm7.40"1280x800
84.9 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
845 g41 mm8.80"2560x1600
85.2 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
942 g22 mm8.40"2560x1600
87.5 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
611 g21.22 mm7.00"1920x1080

外壳 - 手柄更大,更舒适

新款 ROG Ally X 的手柄更大,握起来更舒适。
新款 ROG Ally X 的手柄更大,握起来更舒适。

机身设计方面有两大不同。最引人注目的是颜色,因为新款 Ally X 不再使用白色机身,而是采用了黑色。这既不好也不坏,只是品味问题。黑色表面不易沾染指纹,这是好事。第二个新方面是更大的手柄。原来的 ROG Ally是相对扁平的,使用一段时间后会让人感到厌烦,尤其是对于手掌较大的人来说。现在,新款 ROG Ally X 的手柄加厚了,握起来更加舒适,尤其是在长时间的游戏过程中。手柄背面印有小巧的 ROG 字样,提高了操作性。

从质量上看,ROG Ally X 的塑料机箱依然坚固耐用。我们可以听到轻微的吱吱声,但在使用设备时不会出现这种情况,也不会有任何扭曲。包装盒内有两个黑色硬纸板小支架,可以很好地将 Ally X 固定在桌面上。

华硕尽可能减轻重量,以弥补 80 瓦时电池的不足。新版 ROG Ally 的重量为 685 克,而原版 ROG Ally 为 611 克。在直接对比中,这一点很明显,但我们很快就适应了额外的重量,完全没有感到困扰。65W PSU 重 224 克。

由于手柄较厚,ROG Ally X 需要在包里放更多空间,携带起来也不那么方便。不过,由于改善了人体工学设计,我们对这一妥协感到非常满意。

尺寸比较

298 mm 117 mm 49 mm 640 g325 mm 140 mm 22 mm 942 g299 mm 131 mm 41 mm 845 g294 mm 117 mm 33 mm 672 g280 mm 111 mm 36.9 mm 685 g280.44 mm 111.2 mm 21.22 mm 611 g168 mm 109 mm 26 mm 526 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 现在的游戏手持设备配备 USB 4.0

华硕取消了 XG Mobile 连接器,取而代之的是两个标准 USB-C 端口。其中一个支持 4.0 标准,因此可用于外置 GPU。这意味着,新的 ROG Ally X 作为一台普通电脑连接到一台带电源传输功能的显示器,用途更广泛,也更有趣。这在 ROG Ally 上也同样适用,但现在可以连接额外的硬盘或 USB 加密狗等。电源按钮也是指纹扫描仪,但没有网络摄像头。

顶部:带指纹扫描仪的电源按钮、3.5 毫米立体声、microSD 读卡器、音量按钮、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2(10 Gbps、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0)、USB-C 4.0(40 Gbps、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0)。
顶部:带指纹扫描仪的电源按钮、3.5 毫米立体声、microSD 读卡器、音量按钮、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2(10 Gbps、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0)、USB-C 4.0(40 Gbps、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0)。

SD 读卡器

microSD 读卡器(弹簧装置)位于顶部,使用我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)时,最高传输速率可达 260 MB/s(复制文件时降至 90 MB/s)。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
146.02 MB/s +64%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
132.46 MB/s +48%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
132.4 MB/s +48%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
121 MB/s +36%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (20.9 - 184, n=9, last 2 years)
107.9 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro v60)
89.2 MB/s
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
55 MB/s -38%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
20.9 MB/s -77%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
265.8 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro v60)
260.1 MB/s
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
204.2 MB/s -21%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
191.7 MB/s -26%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (84.6 - 260, n=8, last 2 years)
176.9 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
144.57 MB/s -44%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
85.5 MB/s -67%

交流

Wi-Fi 模块也没有改变,这意味着 Ally X 不支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准。不过,这并不是一个大问题,联发科模块(Wi-Fi 6E)仍能提供出色而稳定的传输速率。在评测期间,我们还流畅地玩了一些游戏,没有出现任何连接中断的情况。

Networking
Asus ROG Ally X
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1675 (min: 1467) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1686 (min: 1452) MBit/s ∼97%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
711 (min: 675) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
715 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1059 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1383 (min: 1280) MBit/s ∼74%
MSI Claw
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1582 (min: 1462) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1524 (min: 1468) MBit/s ∼88%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Quectel FC66E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
917 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
999 (min: 941) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1762 (min: 1653) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1858 (min: 1771) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Go
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1561 (min: 1318) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1711 (min: 862) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1615 (min: 1509) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1789 (min: 1485) MBit/s ∼96%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
981 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1607 (min: 1530) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1753 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼94%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1648 (min: 1587) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1735 (min: 1708) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Asus ROG Ally X; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1675 (1467-1867)
Asus ROG Ally X; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1686 (1452-1740)

维护

拆卸新款 ROG Ally X 的后盖非常简单,但要注意连接背面附加按钮和主板的单根带状电缆。您应该用镊子小心地将其取下。好消息是,你不必拆卸线缆就能访问新的 M.2-2280 固态硬盘。与之前的 M.2-2230 固态硬盘相比,新的外形尺寸还允许进行简单而廉价的升级,并能获得更大的存储容量。

您可以轻松更换新的 M.2-2280 SSD。
您可以轻松更换新的 M.2-2280 SSD。
在取下后盖之前,必须先卸下一条带状电缆。
在取下后盖之前,必须先卸下一条带状电缆。

输入设备 - 改进了操纵杆和 D-pad

改进后的操纵杆带有发光环
改进后的操纵杆带有发光环

除了电容式触摸屏(采用康宁大猩猩玻璃)外,游戏手持设备显然还需要良好的按键和操纵杆。华硕更换了一些组件,你会立即注意到操纵杆的阻力增加了,从而可以在零位附近进行更精确的移动。D-pad 也经过重新设计,使用起来感觉更好。不过,我们对新的触发器(又是霍尔效应)并不完全放心。与原来的 ROG Ally 相比,它的阻力实际上更小了,这可能会在最初的几毫米内增加使用难度(在赛车游戏中尤其明显),而且松开扳机时的噪音也更大了一些。这显然也是个人喜好的问题,我们在游戏过程中没有遇到任何问题。所有其他按钮的手感都差不多。操纵杆周围的圆环可以再次发光(也取决于屏幕内容)。

军械库木箱 SE - 按钮映射
军械库木箱 SE - 按钮映射
军械库木箱 SE - 操纵杆设置
军械库木箱 SE - 操纵杆设置

您可以在 Armoury Crate SE 软件中对控制进行全面定制。首先是简单的按键映射,然后是操纵杆的反应曲线、死区、触发器的行程(左/右分别)、振动(左/右分别)和陀螺仪控制。这已经非常不错了,但最重要的是,你可以为每款游戏单独定制和存储所有这些功能。

军械库木箱 SE - 触发器设置
军械库木箱 SE - 触发器设置
Armoury Crate SE - 振动设置
Armoury Crate SE - 振动设置

背面的两个附加按钮现在小了很多。但它们仍能与 D-pad 和按键一起激活有用的功能(如显示桌面、截图、笔式任务管理器)。不过,在带有一些按钮和操纵杆的小型触摸屏上使用 Windows 系统仍然相当麻烦,尤其是初始设置可能会非常恼人。我们建议尽可能简化设置,使用鼠标/键盘,甚至是带电源传输和附加输入设备的外接屏。一切就绪后,你就可以专注于 Armoury Crate SE 软件了,这也是下一部分的重点。

软件 - Armoury Crate SE 1.5

一切安装和配置完成后,Armoury Crate SE 软件就成了您游戏的主要枢纽。ROG Ally X 配备的是 1.5 版本的软件(ROG Ally 将在晚些时候获得更新),其设计可与触摸屏和手持按键配合使用。除了游戏库,你还可以管理所有设置。通过 Steam、Origin 等常用启动器安装的游戏会自动添加到游戏库中,但也可以手动添加游戏。该软件可以在设备启动时自动启动,因此你可以在大多数情况下忽略 Windows。

军械库木箱 SE - 开始页
军械库木箱 SE - 开始页
现在可通过 Armoury Crate SE 软件访问 AMD 驱动程序选项。
现在可通过 Armoury Crate SE 软件访问 AMD 驱动程序选项。
指挥中心
指挥中心

我们已经讨论过控件的全面自定义选项,但 Armoury Crate SE 软件并没有止步于此。就像操控一样,你可以为每款游戏设置性能配置文件(包括电源和电池),还可以通过 Radeon GPU 驱动程序调整 GPU 设置,而无需使用 Radeon 软件。

屏幕左侧下方的按钮可随时打开 "命令中心",该中心可配置 15 个选项(共 23 个选项)。这是一种超级简便舒适的方式,可用于调整电源配置文件、亮度、音量、分辨率、GPU 选项或操纵杆照明环亮度等重要设置。

实时监控:最低限度
实时监控:最低限度
实时监控:线路
实时监控:线路
实时监控:盒子
实时监控:盒子

其中一个选项是实时监控,有三种不同的设置:最小化、线条和方框。每个选项都会增加屏幕上显示的数据数量,并显示所有重要的性能数据。FPS 监测器非常可靠(上一代机型就已经有),当你试图为自己喜欢的游戏找到合适的设置时,它能提供极大的帮助。我们更喜欢带有当前时间、电池电量、系统总耗电量和 FPS 数值的最小选项。上面的图片显示了所有版本,它们可以在屏幕上自由移动。

显示屏 - 仍为 7 英寸 IPS,带 VRR

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
轻微背光出血
轻微背光出血

7 英寸 IPS 屏幕没有任何变化,整体图像质量非常好。Steam Deck 的 OLED 面板 蒸汽甲板的 OLED 面板可能略胜一筹,但 Ally X 的面板则提供了 VRR(可变刷新率),这在玩帧数相对较低的游戏时是一个很大的改进。总之,120 Hz IPS 屏幕的快速响应时间对于游戏来说仍然是一个非常不错的选择。现在还有 PWM 功能,华硕还将最低亮度从 25 cd/m² 降低到 10 cd/m²,这在黑暗环境中很有帮助。

广告宣传的亮度仍为 500 尼特,但我们的评测机平均亮度为 456 尼特,稍暗一些。看起来我们的设备采用了较弱的面板,而去年的 ROG Ally(面板 ID 相同)则略微亮一些。黑色值为 0.35 cd/m²,最大对比度接近 1400:1。屏幕不支持 HDR 内容,也没有亮度或色温自动控制功能。

462
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
TL070FVXS01-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 484 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 455.8 cd/m² Minimum: 10.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 484 cd/m²
Contrast: 1383:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Asus ROG Ally X
TL070FVXS01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
MSI Claw
TL070FVXS02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
ANX7530 U, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4", 90 Hz
Lenovo Legion Go
Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz
Ayaneo Kun
Ayaneo 2K, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4", 60 Hz
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz
Display
-1%
1%
32%
26%
27%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
66.2
64.8
-2%
67
1%
99.6
50%
92.1
39%
93.52
41%
65.6
-1%
sRGB Coverage
93.4
93.3
0%
94.4
1%
100
7%
99.56
7%
99.4
6%
92.1
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68.5
67
-2%
69.4
1%
96.1
40%
90.09
32%
91.2
33%
67.9
-1%
Response Times
-2%
-6%
-26%
-134%
-167%
-7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.7 ?(4.4, 5.3)
8.9 ?(4.1, 4.8)
8%
9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6)
5%
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
7%
20.8 ?(9.4, 11.4)
-114%
24.2 ?(13.8, 10.4)
-149%
10.5 ?(5, 5.5)
-8%
Response Time Black / White *
5.7 ?(2.5, 3.2)
6.3 ?(3.4, 2.9)
-11%
6.6 ?(3.1, 3.5)
-16%
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
-58%
14.4 ?(7, 7.4)
-153%
16.2 ?(7.6, 8.6)
-184%
6 ?(2.7, 3.3)
-5%
PWM Frequency
360 ?(100)
700
20000
Screen
-2%
6%
162%
-30%
-10%
-8%
Brightness middle
484
493
2%
477
-1%
485
0%
411
-15%
680
40%
513
6%
Brightness
456
470
3%
461
1%
482
6%
413
-9%
678
49%
474
4%
Brightness Distribution
88
86
-2%
88
0%
98
11%
80
-9%
91
3%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.35
0.47
-34%
0.32
9%
0.03
91%
0.42
-20%
0.5
-43%
0.38
-9%
Contrast
1383
1049
-24%
1491
8%
16167
1069%
979
-29%
1360
-2%
1350
-2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.9
2.36
19%
2.6
10%
2
31%
5.94
-105%
4
-38%
3.7
-28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.1
6.36
10%
5.8
18%
5
30%
10.56
-49%
9
-27%
8.3
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.4
1.3
7%
1.5
-7%
2.95
-111%
1
29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.5
4.4
2%
3.9
13%
2
56%
0.92
80%
9
-100%
5.1
-13%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.28 96%
2.17 101%
2 110%
1.93 114%
2 110%
2.14 103%
CCT
7534 86%
7142 91%
7250 90%
6336 103%
8064 81%
7188 90%
7732 84%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -2%
0% / 3%
56% / 103%
-46% / -33%
-50% / -24%
-5% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 饱和度扫描
CalMAN 饱和度扫描
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 饱和度扫描已校准
CalMAN 饱和度扫描已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准

华硕并没有为 ROG Ally X 提供色彩配置文件,出厂设置显示出明显的偏蓝和冷色温,但色彩偏差尚可。这种组合有助于最大限度地提高亮度。你几乎不会在小屏幕上编辑任何图片,因此情况并不理想,但这并不像在较大的笔记本电脑屏幕上那么重要。我们自己的校准(配置文件链接在上面的框中,可免费下载)明显改善了画质,但中心的最大亮度因此从 484 尼特下降到 434 尼特。

对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.5 ms rise
↘ 3.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 5.3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下
在阳光下
室外(明亮的白天,无阳光直射)
室外(明亮的白天,无阳光直射)

Ally X 的触摸屏是光面的,但在户外使用这款小设备很容易找到合适的位置。根据我们自己使用原版 ROG Ally 的经验,我们可以说,只要避免阳光直射,在明亮的日子里玩游戏还是很舒适的。在视角稳定性方面没有任何问题。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - AMD Zen4,内存速度更快

新款 ROG Ally X 仍使用 AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme集成 Radeon 780M.不过,华硕改变了内存配置:不再使用 16GB LPDDR5-6400 内存,而是 24GB 更快的 LPDDR5x-7500 内存。默认情况下,24 GB 中的 8 GB 分配给 iGPU,其余 16 GB 用于系统。

 
 

审查设置

华硕为 ROG Ally X 调整了我们熟悉的电源配置文件,安静模式(10 至 13 瓦)和性能模式(15 至 17 瓦)的 SoC 消耗都较高。Turbo 模式的电源功耗仍为 30 瓦,电池功耗仍为 25 瓦。请注意,这些数值表示 APU 的持续功耗,但 Ryzen 芯片在短时间内的功耗可能更高。我们在下表中总结了功耗曲线和性能数据:

功率曲线 APU TDP CB R23 Multi Time Spy 图形 CP 2077 1080p Med 最大风扇噪音
安静 15/13 W 8446 pt 1840 pt 16.3 FPS 32.2 dB(A)
性能 29/24/17 W 12254 pt 2800 pt 26.4 FPS 33.8 dB(A)
涡轮增压(电池) 35/30/25 W 13425 pt 3017 pt 31.1 FPS 37.4 dB(A)
涡轮 53/43/30 W 15120 Pkt. 3196 pt 34.3 FPS 42.6 dB(A)

在进行基准测试和测量时,我们默认使用主电源的 Turbo 模式,这样可以获得最佳性能。在游戏基准测试中,超级分辨率、流畅运动帧等所有附加功能都被关闭,但我们也会在游戏部分介绍这些功能。

处理器 - Ryzen Z1 Extreme

AMD 的 Ryzen Z1 Extreme(基本上是 Ryzen 7 7840U)拥有 8 个 Zen4 内核(16 个线程),最高主频为 5.1 GHz。它仍然是一款功能强大的移动处理器,其性能比 酷睿至尊 7 155H更强。 微星的 Claw掌上电脑。总之,基准测试结果非常好,持续工作负载下的性能下降非常小,约为 10%。与原来的 ROG Ally相比也有细微差别,这并不奇怪。在电池供电的 Turbo 模式下,由于最大 TDP 较低,CPU 多核性能在不使用 PSU 的情况下降低了约 11%。其他 CPU 基准测试请参见 我们的技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø2187 (2041.02-2336.18)
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U: Ø1530 (1503.99-1538.94)
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1922 (1902.14-1950.08)
Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø1914 (1836.13-2049.71)
Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2405 (2346.87-2439.02)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme; Turbo: Ø2271 (2104.49-2396.5)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
84.4 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
82.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 
81.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Go -2!
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
79.1 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
75 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
73.9 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
68.8 pt
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
67.9 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -6!
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
42.8 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
15120 Points
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15074 Points 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
14960 Points -1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14463 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (13004 - 15120, n=3)
14361 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
13004 Points -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3984 - 15120, n=11, last 2 years)
12051 Points -20%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
10162 (10024.9min - 10161.8max) Points -33%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3984 Points -74%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1779 Points +3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1770 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (1733 - 1779, n=3)
1748 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1733 Points 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1733 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
1708 Points -1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1088 - 1770, n=10, last 2 years)
1647 Points -5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1597 Points -8%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5917 Points +2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5825 Points +1%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5794 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (5109 - 5825, n=3)
5576 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5109 Points -12%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4805 Points -17%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1521 - 5917, n=9, last 2 years)
4627 Points -20%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
3987 Points -31%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1521 Points -74%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
692 Points +3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
684 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (672 - 692, n=3)
679 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
672 Points 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
672 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
670 Points 0%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
622 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (357 - 684, n=9, last 2 years)
605 Points -10%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
357 Points -47%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2439 (2346.87min - 2439.02max) Points +4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2397 (2104.49min - 2396.5max) Points +3%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2336 (2041.02min - 2336.18max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (2050 - 2397, n=3)
2261 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2050 (1836.13min - 2049.71max) Points -12%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1950 (1902.14min - 1950.08max) Points -17%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (689 - 2439, n=9, last 2 years)
1881 Points -19%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
1539 (1503.99min - 1538.94max) Points -34%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
689 Points -71%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
280 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (262 - 280, n=3)
270 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
268 Points +2%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
268 Points +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
262 Points
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (176.6 - 268, n=8, last 2 years)
251 Points -4%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
246 Points -6%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
315 Seconds * -47%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (208 - 315, n=7, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * -18%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
246 Seconds * -15%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
214 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (213 - 214, n=2)
214 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
213 Seconds * -0%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
208 Seconds * +3%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
64454 MIPS
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
62657 MIPS -3%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
62156 MIPS -4%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (56966 - 64454, n=3)
61359 MIPS -5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
56966 MIPS -12%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
53599 MIPS -17%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19684 - 64454, n=9, last 2 years)
51570 MIPS -20%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
47579 MIPS -26%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
19684 MIPS -69%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6316 MIPS +4%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (6077 - 6316, n=2)
6197 MIPS +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6077 MIPS
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
6064 MIPS 0%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5490 MIPS -10%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5318 MIPS -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3653 - 6077, n=8, last 2 years)
5279 MIPS -13%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3653 MIPS -40%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12026 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
11727 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (10872 - 12026, n=4)
11404 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10990 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10872 Points -10%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10464 Points -13%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
9711 Points -19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4587 - 12026, n=10, last 2 years)
9077 Points -25%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7778 Points -35%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4587 Points -62%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2550 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2538 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2530 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (2530 - 2550, n=4)
2537 Points -1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2530 Points -1%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
2528 Points -1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2433 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1348 - 2550, n=10, last 2 years)
2230 Points -13%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2194 Points -14%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1348 Points -47%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10917 Points +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10713 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (9589 - 10917, n=4)
10256 Points -4%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10076 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
9803 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
9589 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4457 - 10713, n=10, last 2 years)
8563 Points -20%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8389 Points -22%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
8205 Points -23%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4457 Points -58%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1956 Points +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1917 Points
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (1896 - 1956, n=4)
1917 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1898 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1896 Points -1%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
1879 Points -2%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1780 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1278 - 1917, n=10, last 2 years)
1676 Points -13%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1486 Points -22%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1355 Points -29%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.7 fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
18.6 fps -1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.4 fps -2%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (16.3 - 18.7, n=3)
17.8 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
16.3 fps -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (12.5 - 18.7, n=8, last 2 years)
15.8 fps -16%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14.7 fps -21%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
12.5 fps -33%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
53.5 s * -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (46.2 - 63.8, n=8, last 2 years)
52.8 s * -3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
52.3 s * -2%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
51.4 s *
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
49.2 s * +4%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (43 - 52.3, n=3)
48.9 s * +5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.2 s * +10%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
43 s * +16%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.4601 - 0.678, n=9, last 2 years)
0.4975 sec * -8%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4945 sec * -7%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4912 sec * -7%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
0.4765 sec * -4%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4665 sec * -1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4662 sec * -1%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4601 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (0.4447 - 0.4662, n=3)
0.457 sec * +1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4447 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2336 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
176.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
262 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5794 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1733 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15120 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
95.2 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
88.4 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
86.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 
82.9 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
77.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
73.6 pt
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
64.5 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
57 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
25901 KRay/s +6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
25652 KRay/s +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
24519 KRay/s
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
24067 KRay/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (20714 - 24519, n=3)
23100 KRay/s -6%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
20714 KRay/s -16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (10795 - 25901, n=9, last 2 years)
20307 KRay/s -17%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
15166 KRay/s -38%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10795 KRay/s -56%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
109745 Points +6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
108496 Points +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
103637 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
102584 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (86738 - 103637, n=3)
97653 Points -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (58068 - 109745, n=9, last 2 years)
87115 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
86738 Points -16%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
64229 Points -38%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
58068 Points -44%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4847 MB/s +9%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4777 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
4465 MB/s
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
4420 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (3854 - 4465, n=3)
4246 MB/s -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2707 - 4847, n=9, last 2 years)
3918 MB/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
3854 MB/s -14%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
3156 MB/s -29%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
2707 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
114294 Points +6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
113343 Points +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
107867 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
106595 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (95153 - 107867, n=3)
103205 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
95153 Points -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (69419 - 114294, n=9, last 2 years)
94473 Points -12%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
76873 Points -29%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69419 Points -36%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
14822 Points +4%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
14596 Points +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
14281 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
14070 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (12936 - 14281, n=3)
13762 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12936 Points -9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8463 - 14822, n=9, last 2 years)
12441 Points -13%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
10690 Points -25%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8463 Points -41%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
58482 Points +5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
57426 Points +4%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
55457 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
54962 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (46180 - 55457, n=3)
52200 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
46180 Points -17%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (28245 - 58482, n=9, last 2 years)
46040 Points -17%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
34209 Points -38%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
28245 Points -49%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
166333 MB/s +108%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
165008 MB/s +106%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
113789 MB/s +42%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (57678 - 166333, n=9, last 2 years)
108538 MB/s +35%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
80158 MB/s
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76146 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (57678 - 80158, n=3)
71327 MB/s -11%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
59882 MB/s -25%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
57678 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
1047 MB/s +6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
958 MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
987 MB/s
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
964 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (687 - 987, n=3)
879 MB/s -11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (654 - 1047, n=9, last 2 years)
846 MB/s -14%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
796 MB/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
687 MB/s -30%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
654 MB/s -34%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13846 KRay/s +6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13765 KRay/s +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
13049 KRay/s
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12875 KRay/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (10740 - 13049, n=3)
12221 KRay/s -6%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
10740 KRay/s -18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5732 - 13846, n=9, last 2 years)
10694 KRay/s -18%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
7715 KRay/s -41%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
5732 KRay/s -56%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
49287 MPixel/s +23%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
39932 MPixel/s
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
38722 MPixel/s -3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
37540 MPixel/s -6%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (34764 - 39932, n=3)
37412 MPixel/s -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (26622 - 49287, n=9, last 2 years)
35035 MPixel/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
34764 MPixel/s -13%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
30576 MPixel/s -23%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
29573 MPixel/s -26%

系统性能

ROG Ally X 具备不带 dGPU 的现代超极本/笔记本电脑的性能,可以轻松用作迷你电脑甚至是主要设备,尤其是在结合外接屏幕和连接输入设备的情况下。基准测试结果非常好,我们在评测期间没有遇到任何稳定性问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7149 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
6907 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (6439 - 7149, n=3)
6832 Points -4%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
6643 Points -7%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
6504 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
6439 Points -10%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6330 Points -11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5866 - 7149, n=9, last 2 years)
6319 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10633 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
10620 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (10081 - 10633, n=3)
10337 Points -3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10296 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
10081 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (9068 - 10633, n=9, last 2 years)
9730 Points -8%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9610 Points -10%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
9483 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10074 Points +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9912 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
9742 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (8996 - 10074, n=3)
9661 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
8996 Points -9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7323 - 9912, n=9, last 2 years)
8467 Points -15%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
8346 Points -16%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8089 Points -18%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9408 Points
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9311 Points -1%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8975 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (7990 - 9408, n=3)
8673 Points -8%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
8621 Points -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7204 - 9408, n=9, last 2 years)
8349 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
7990 Points -15%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
7690 Points -18%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1718 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1693 - 1718, n=2)
1706 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1693 Points 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1693 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1541 Points -9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (840 - 1693, n=7, last 2 years)
1390 Points -18%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1366 Points -19%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
840 Points -50%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1662 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1639 - 1662, n=2)
1651 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1649 Points +1%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1639 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1514 Points -8%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1429 Points -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (874 - 1649, n=7, last 2 years)
1407 Points -14%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
874 Points -47%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1878 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1868 - 1878, n=2)
1873 Points 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1868 Points
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1795 Points -4%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1677 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (808 - 1868, n=7, last 2 years)
1421 Points -24%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1272 Points -32%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
808 Points -57%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1538 Points +10%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1479 Points +6%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1451 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1392 - 1451, n=2)
1422 Points +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1392 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (831 - 1538, n=7, last 2 years)
1270 Points -9%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1262 Points -9%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
831 Points -40%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
432 Points +42%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (300 - 432, n=3)
345 Points +13%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
306 Points +1%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
304 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
300 Points -1%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
276 Points -9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (188.4 - 306, n=9, last 2 years)
254 Points -16%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
228 Points -25%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
188.4 Points -38%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
277 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (248 - 277, n=2)
263 Points +6%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
255 Points +3%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
248 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (107 - 255, n=6, last 2 years)
192.7 Points -22%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
179.4 Points -28%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
107 Points -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
746 ms * -39%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
565 ms * -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (516 - 779, n=9, last 2 years)
587 ms * -10%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
556 ms * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
  (536 - 556, n=2)
546 ms * -2%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
539 ms * -1%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
536 ms *
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
529 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7149 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92447 MB/s +24%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
81717 MB/s +10%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (74414 - 92447, n=3)
81124 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76512 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
74414 MB/s
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
69310 MB/s -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (32617 - 81717, n=10, last 2 years)
58091 MB/s -22%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
45357 MB/s -39%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
45279 MB/s -39%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
32617 MB/s -56%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80481 MB/s +37%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
58713 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
55710 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (50337 - 58713, n=3)
54920 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
50337 MB/s -14%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
49510 MB/s -16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25380 - 80481, n=9, last 2 years)
49175 MB/s -16%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
48348 MB/s -18%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25380 MB/s -57%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
108872 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
106998 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (92869 - 108872, n=3)
102913 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92869 MB/s -13%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
92722 MB/s -13%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75350 MB/s -30%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25596 - 108872, n=11, last 2 years)
67453 MB/s -37%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
50079 MB/s -53%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49922 MB/s -53%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49426 MB/s -54%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25596 MB/s -76%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
139.6 ns * -14%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
134.4 ns * -10%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.2 ns * -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112.6 - 139.6, n=10, last 2 years)
127.8 ns * -5%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
122.1 ns *
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
119.5 ns * +2%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M
118.8 ns * +3%
Average AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
  (113.7 - 122.1, n=3)
118.4 ns * +3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
113.7 ns * +7%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
112.6 ns * +8%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)显示,当你想使用实时音频应用程序时,采用当前 BIOS 版本的评测机存在一些限制。不过,对于游戏手持设备来说,这种情况并不常见。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2500.2 μs * -68%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2293.5 μs * -54%
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1486.6 μs *
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1421.6 μs * +4%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
744.2 μs * +50%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

新款 ROG Ally X 配备了通过 PCIe 4.0 连接的普通 M.2-2280 固态硬盘。它默认配备 1 TB 硬盘,我们的硬盘由 Western Digital(SN560)提供。初始设置后,您可以使用 891 GB 来存储自己的文件/应用程序。传输速率不错,只是在持续工作负荷下性能会略有下降。如果你有一个全面的游戏库,很容易升级硬盘。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.

WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4928 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3421 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 602 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 466 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 90.6 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 419 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1128 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
69 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
68.7 pt
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
62.8 pt
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
 
60.6 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
60 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
59.5 pt
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" -11!
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
50.1 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -11!
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
47.7 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
44.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
5565 (3733.98min - 5564.79max) MB/s +107%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
4132 (2139.64min - 4132.14max) MB/s +53%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2406 - 4128, n=20)
3165 MB/s +18%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2878 (2833.46min - 2878.46max) MB/s +7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (431 - 5565, n=10, last 2 years)
2840 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2693 (2674.18min - 2692.74max) MB/s
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2166 (2068.63min - 2166.36max) MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
2106 (2093.38min - 2106.19max) MB/s -22%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
463 (318.56min - 463.17max) MB/s -83%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
431 (334.87min - 430.55max) MB/s -84%
seq write
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3804 (1734.97min - 3803.55max) MB/s +37%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2235 - 3416, n=20)
2924 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2768 (2498.37min - 2767.74max) MB/s
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2758 (2188.17min - 2758.38max) MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (259 - 5102, n=10, last 2 years)
2298 MB/s -17%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2168 (1852.9min - 2167.62max) MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1644 (1600.76min - 1644.1max) MB/s -41%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1056 (164.42min - 1056.34max) MB/s -62%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
263 (255.13min - 262.56max) MB/s -90%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (118.2min - 258.69max) MB/s -91%
seq q8 t1 read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6987 (616.14min - 6987.16max) MB/s +41%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6320 (613min - 6319.71max) MB/s +28%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
5068 (4682.73min - 5068.47max) MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4952 (4163.75min - 4951.75max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3728 - 5023, n=20)
4908 MB/s -1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2458 - 7005, n=10, last 2 years)
4718 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
4274 (3828.24min - 4274.42max) MB/s -14%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
3760 (2910.85min - 3760.19max) MB/s -24%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2937 (2456.3min - 2936.85max) MB/s -41%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2458 (2277.98min - 2458.28max) MB/s -50%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3894 (3354.39min - 3893.57max) MB/s +28%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2957 - 3464, n=20)
3226 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3033 (2657.93min - 3033.11max) MB/s
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2871 (2238.71min - 2871max) MB/s -5%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2720 (405.62min - 2720.02max) MB/s -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (256 - 6151, n=10, last 2 years)
2537 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1790 (1750.28min - 1789.5max) MB/s -41%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1088 (990.07min - 1088.21max) MB/s -64%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (256.06min - 258.58max) MB/s -91%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
256 (243.34min - 256.39max) MB/s -92%
4k q1 t1 read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
97.4 (60.76min - 97.44max) MB/s +89%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
72.2 (70.46min - 72.23max) MB/s +40%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
68 (66.96min - 68max) MB/s +32%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (37.3 - 97.4, n=10, last 2 years)
59.4 MB/s +15%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (41.9 - 73.3, n=20)
57 MB/s +11%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
56.2 (53.97min - 56.15max) MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
51.5 (50.22min - 51.53max) MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
39.1 (33.75min - 39.14max) MB/s -24%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
37.3 (36.41min - 37.3max) MB/s -28%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
33.4 (33.02min - 33.38max) MB/s -35%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
226 (185.56min - 226.08max) MB/s +60%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
210 (193.2min - 209.71max) MB/s +49%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
202 (192.69min - 202.49max) MB/s +43%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
192.3 (177.32min - 192.31max) MB/s +36%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
164.6 (149.63min - 164.58max) MB/s +17%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (78 - 318, n=20)
177.4 MB/s +26%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112.3 - 226, n=11, last 2 years)
172 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
151.3 (148.2min - 151.25max) MB/s +7%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
143.5 (141.41min - 143.46max) MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
140.9 (139.71min - 140.94max) MB/s
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
112.3 (81.5min - 112.29max) MB/s -20%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2148 (2142.5min - 2147.8max) MB/s +94%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1943 (1054.45min - 1942.86max) MB/s +76%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (86 - 4025, n=10, last 2 years)
1299 MB/s +17%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1190 (1169.72min - 1189.9max) MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1106 (1031.05min - 1105.71max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (592 - 1544, n=20)
1085 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
984 (894.6min - 983.67max) MB/s -11%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
407 (296.91min - 406.67max) MB/s -63%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
150.3 (144.83min - 150.29max) MB/s -86%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
86 (58.25min - 86max) MB/s -92%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
2871 (1656.3min - 2870.9max) MB/s +542%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (227 - 2783, n=20)
1079 MB/s +141%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (89.1 - 2871, n=10, last 2 years)
1003 MB/s +124%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
542 (404.55min - 542.06max) MB/s +21%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
461 (454.49min - 460.76max) MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
447 (437.78min - 446.91max) MB/s
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
434 (400.52min - 433.94max) MB/s -3%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
262 MB/s -41%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (220.73min - 258.5max) MB/s -42%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
89.1 (82.16min - 89.09max) MB/s -80%
AS SSD
Score Total
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8425 Points +79%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2412 - 8425, n=6, last 2 years)
4809 Points +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4711 Points
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
4480 Points -5%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2750 - 5610, n=18)
4125 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3969 Points -16%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3522 Points -25%
Score Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
2527 Points +92%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2189 Points +66%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (842 - 2527, n=6, last 2 years)
1734 Points +32%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1447 Points +10%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (872 - 1761, n=18)
1349 Points +3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1319 Points 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1315 Points
Score Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
4632 Points +66%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2787 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1161 - 4632, n=6, last 2 years)
2224 Points -20%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (651 - 3010, n=18)
2156 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1814 Points -35%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1623 Points -42%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1225 Points -56%
Seq Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
5260 MB/s +49%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
4140.35 MB/s +17%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3074 - 4328, n=18)
3885 MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3524 MB/s
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3395 MB/s -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (193.2 - 5260, n=7, last 2 years)
3156 MB/s -10%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2601 MB/s -26%
Seq Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
4573 MB/s +119%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3282.76 MB/s +58%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (80.9 - 4573, n=7, last 2 years)
2414 MB/s +16%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (1536 - 3101, n=18)
2315 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2084 MB/s
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1397 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1370 MB/s -34%
4K Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
73.2 MB/s +54%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
64.6 MB/s +36%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
55.21 MB/s +16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (34 - 73.2, n=6, last 2 years)
54.2 MB/s +14%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (36.6 - 61.3, n=18)
50.1 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.5 MB/s
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
44.6 MB/s -6%
4K Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
218 MB/s +30%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (117 - 512, n=18)
204 MB/s +22%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
200 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
167.9 MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (90.7 - 218, n=6, last 2 years)
157.5 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
150.68 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
130 MB/s -23%
4K-64 Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1928 MB/s +111%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1864 MB/s +104%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (590 - 1928, n=6, last 2 years)
1314 MB/s +44%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
977.4 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
935 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
915 MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (457 - 1272, n=18)
910 MB/s -1%
4K-64 Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
3957 MB/s +64%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2411 MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (885 - 3957, n=6, last 2 years)
1786 MB/s -26%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (172.9 - 2500, n=18)
1736 MB/s -28%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1356 MB/s -44%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1335.19 MB/s -45%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
885 MB/s -63%
Access Time Read
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
0.122 ms * -307%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.029 - 0.151, n=6, last 2 years)
0.07917 ms * -164%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (0.026 - 0.17, n=18)
0.07078 ms * -136%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.068 ms * -127%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.036 ms * -20%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.03 ms *
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
0.029 ms * +3%
Access Time Write
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.115 ms * -423%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (0.016 - 0.088, n=18)
0.03311 ms * -51%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.016 - 0.067, n=6, last 2 years)
0.0305 ms * -39%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
0.024 ms * -9%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.022 ms *
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.021 ms * +5%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
0.016 ms * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

02505007501000125015001750200022502500275030003250350037504000425045004750Tooltip
Asus ROG Ally X; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4825 (4360.49-4964.31)

图形处理器性能 - Radeon 780M

GPU-Z AMD Radeon 780M
GPU-Z AMD Radeon 780M

AMD 的 Radeon 780M与去年的 ROG Ally,但更快的内存带来了不同。结果是我们迄今测试过的最快的 Radeon 780M。这意味着 Radeon iGPU 仍略逊于 英特尔弧形显卡微星魔爪Time Spy 测试中略逊于英特尔 Arc Graphics,但在整体性能评级中却遥遥领先。Ally X 通常也领先于 AMD 的其他对手。

我们已经说过,8 GB 内存现在默认分配给 GPU,但你也可以手动调整这个值。此外,还有超级分辨率、流体运动帧、Radeon chill 等驱动程序选项,可直接从 Armoury Crate SE 软件中访问,这些选项可针对每款游戏单独配置,无需使用 Radeon 软件。

Turbo 模式会降低对电池电量的消耗,因此 GPU 的最大电池性能也会受到影响。不过,差异很小,仅为 6%。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
97.2 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
95.5 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
91.1 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
88 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
86 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M
 
85.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
84.9 pt
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
73.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
13828 Points
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13073 Points -5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12795 Points -7%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (7868 - 14249, n=56)
12460 Points -10%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12205 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12162 Points -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (10150 - 13828, n=8, last 2 years)
11923 Points -14%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
10150 Points -27%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
8775 Points
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8618 Points -2%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8373 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7974 Points -9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6683 - 8775, n=11, last 2 years)
7891 Points -10%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7865 Points -10%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (4550 - 8816, n=58)
7747 Points -12%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
6683 Points -24%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3491 Points +9%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3196 Points
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2913 Points -9%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2854 Points -11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2444 - 3491, n=11, last 2 years)
2853 Points -11%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (1496 - 3196, n=58)
2713 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2646 Points -17%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
2444 Points -24%
3DMark 11 Performance
13368 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8172 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3507 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
519 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
2972 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
517 Seconds * -42%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
446 Seconds * -22%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
437 Seconds * -20%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
417 Seconds * -14%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
332 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (332 - 517, n=9, last 2 years)
417 Seconds * -14%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (300 - 664, n=54)
375 Seconds * -3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
366 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
365 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

这是游戏掌上电脑最重要的部分。我们显然进行了标准的游戏基准测试,ROG Ally X 在对比排行榜上名列前茅,而且还领先于 微星魔爪英特尔 CPU。根据不同的游戏,性能会有细微差别,但总体游戏性能还是非常不错的。

我们有两台 ROG Ally X 的评测机,两位编辑(经常使用原版 ROG Ally)都认为性能配置文件代表了性能/功耗/风扇噪音之间的最佳折衷。这是由于功耗限制略有增加,但由于内存更多/更快,性能也有所提高。我们想举两个具体的例子:在 1080p 和中等设置下,《极限竞速地平线 5》需要使用 Turbo 模式才能达到稳定的 60 fps。新版 Ally X 可以通过性能配置文件实现这一目标,这在风扇噪音和电池寿命方面带来了巨大的改变。对马幽灵》(1080p、中等设置、FSR + FG)也是如此:以前我们必须使用 "涡轮增压 "模式,现在我们可以使用 "性能 "模式。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
95.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
90 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
88.5 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
88.3 pt
MSI Claw -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
86 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
83 pt
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
77.5 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -3!
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
63.8 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
33.9 fps +9%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
31.1 fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.4 (27min, 28P1) fps -5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 (24min, 26P1) fps -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (17.5 - 33.9, n=11, last 2 years)
27.1 fps -13%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.6 fps -18%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 (22min) fps -19%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.1 (7.11min, 18.9P1) fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 (3.65min, 16.9P1) fps -1%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.5 (1.496min, 15.9P1) fps -2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.7 (3min, 16.9P1) fps -5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 (7.24min, 13.5P1) fps -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.6 - 27.1, n=11, last 2 years)
24.6 fps -9%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
19.5 fps -28%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (1.3)
30 fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1.3)
28.6 fps -5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (1.3)
27.7 fps -8%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (1.3)
27.3 fps -9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.4 - 30, n=12, last 2 years)
25.7 fps -14%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1.3)
25.4 fps -15%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1.3)
24.5 fps -18%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU (1.3)
18.4 fps -39%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
51.6 (35.6min, 40.1P1) fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
49.1 (35.6min, 38.9P1) fps -5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
46.3 (8.7min, 11.5P1) fps -10%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46 fps -11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30 - 51.6, n=12, last 2 years)
44.1 fps -15%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
42.6 (7.5min, 9.94P1) fps -17%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
42.6 (32min, 33.6P1) fps -17%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
30 fps -42%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
78.7 (68.6min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
76.2 (68.4min) fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
75.5 (67.6min) fps -1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
63.6 (41.1min) fps -17%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
62.2 (53.9min) fps -18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30.8 - 78.7, n=12, last 2 years)
61.7 fps -19%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
59.7 (52.4min) fps -22%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
58.6 (51.9min) fps -23%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
38.9 fps +17%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33.8 fps +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33.2 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24.5 - 38.9, n=12, last 2 years)
30.3 fps -9%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.9 fps -10%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.4 fps -17%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 fps -20%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.5 fps -26%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
52.1 (9.9min) fps +18%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
44.1 (37.1min) fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.9 (24.5min) fps 0%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.4 (30.1min) fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (32.5 - 52.1, n=40)
40.3 fps -9%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
39.1 fps -11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25 - 52.1, n=16, last 2 years)
38.1 fps -14%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
32.7 (27.3min) fps -26%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
30.9 (26.2min) fps -30%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25 fps -43%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
34.3 (30min) fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
33.9 (25.1min) fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (16.3 - 37.5, n=36)
30.9 fps -10%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.9 fps -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (16.3 - 34.3, n=11, last 2 years)
28.5 fps -17%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.3 (21.8min) fps -26%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.8 (20.9min) fps -28%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29 fps +7%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.3 (18.4min) fps 0%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.8 (18.7min) fps -9%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.2 (23.2min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.8 - 29.6, n=37)
24.6 fps -10%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
23.8 fps -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.8 - 29, n=13, last 2 years)
23.2 fps -15%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
21.9 (18.9min) fps -19%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
21.13 fps -22%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
20.1 (16.8min) fps -26%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
22.9 (19.3min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (11.5 - 26.3, n=32)
21.3 fps -7%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
20.3 fps -11%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
19.8 (16.6min) fps -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (11.5 - 22.9, n=7, last 2 years)
18.8 fps -18%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
16.9 (14.2min) fps -26%
F1 23
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
95.4 (82min, 76P1) fps +6%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
89.6 (77min, 73P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (42.4 - 95.4, n=30)
77.4 fps -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (43.2 - 95.4, n=8, last 2 years)
75.8 fps -15%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
64.4 (38min, 52P1) fps -28%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
84.4 (74min, 69P1) fps +7%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
79 (69min, 64P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (38.1 - 84.4, n=30)
68.4 fps -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (38.6 - 84.4, n=8, last 2 years)
68 fps -14%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
59.4 (46min, 48P1) fps -25%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
61.1 (53min, 51P1) fps +8%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
57.2 (46min, 35P1) fps +1%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
56.6 (49min, 47P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (27.3 - 61.1, n=31)
49.4 fps -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (27.3 - 61.1, n=9, last 2 years)
49.1 fps -13%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
41.2 (33min, 33P1) fps -27%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
14.6 (9min, 9P1) fps +12%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
13 (6min, 8P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (6.25 - 14.7, n=22)
11.8 fps -9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6.25 - 14.6, n=7, last 2 years)
11.1 fps -15%
F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
91.5 (75min, 69P1) fps +1%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
90.9 (78min, 66P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (43.3 - 94.8, n=14)
78 fps -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (43.3 - 91.5, n=5, last 2 years)
75.6 fps -17%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
78.3 (68min, 62P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
75.5 (65min, 56P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (36.4 - 80.1, n=14)
65 fps -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (37.1 - 78.3, n=5, last 2 years)
64.8 fps -14%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
57.7 (50min, 47P1) fps +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
55.1 (45min, 46P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (23.3 - 59.5, n=14)
47.9 fps -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (27.1 - 57.7, n=5, last 2 years)
47.2 fps -14%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
14.5 (10min, 10P1) fps +8%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
13.4 (6min, 9P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (6.39 - 14.5, n=11)
11.8 fps -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6.39 - 14.5, n=5, last 2 years)
11.4 fps -15%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
41.1 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
39.6 fps -4%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (20.2 - 43.9, n=24)
36.6 fps -11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (20.2 - 41.1, n=7, last 2 years)
32.5 fps -21%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
31.7 fps -23%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
30.2 fps -27%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
32.1 fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
31.4 fps -2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
30.8 fps -4%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (15.7 - 36.8, n=26)
29.3 fps -9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (15.7 - 32.1, n=9, last 2 years)
26.8 fps -17%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.8 fps -23%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.3 fps -24%
1920x1080 High Preset
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 fps +3%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
26.6 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 fps -6%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.8 - 29.9, n=26)
24.4 fps -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.8 - 27.5, n=9, last 2 years)
22.4 fps -16%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21.1 fps -21%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.7 fps -22%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.5 fps +3%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.8 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
24 fps -7%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.4 - 29.2, n=25)
23.7 fps -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.5 - 26.5, n=9, last 2 years)
21.7 fps -16%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.3 fps -21%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
20.2 fps -22%
Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
78 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
73 fps -6%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (42 - 89, n=44)
72 fps -8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
67 fps -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (47 - 78, n=8, last 2 years)
63.6 fps -18%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
60 (48min) fps -23%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
47 (32min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
46 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
43 fps -7%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (22 - 54, n=46)
42.2 fps -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25 - 48, n=10, last 2 years)
40.6 fps -12%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
40 fps -13%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
39 (32min) fps -15%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
38 (34min) fps -17%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45 (31min) fps +7%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
42 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
40 fps -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (21 - 49, n=46)
38.9 fps -7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
37 fps -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (23 - 45, n=11, last 2 years)
36.7 fps -13%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
36 (32min) fps -14%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
36 (31min) fps -14%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
27 fps -36%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43 (31min) fps +8%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
40 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
37 fps -7%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (21 - 47, n=46)
37 fps -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (22 - 43, n=11, last 2 years)
34.5 fps -14%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
34 fps -15%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
34 (29min) fps -15%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33 (20min) fps -17%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
23 fps -42%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
104 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
97 fps -7%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (61 - 109.2, n=14)
93.4 fps -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41 - 104, n=6, last 2 years)
77.7 fps -25%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
69 fps -34%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
41 fps -61%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
47 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
43 fps -9%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43 fps -9%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (26.5 - 48, n=19)
40.7 fps -13%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
40 fps -15%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (27 - 48, n=11, last 2 years)
39.6 fps -16%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
33 fps -30%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
28 fps -40%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42 fps 0%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
42 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
38 fps -10%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (23.4 - 42, n=17)
36.2 fps -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24 - 42, n=9, last 2 years)
35.3 fps -16%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
32 fps -24%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
31 fps -26%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
28 fps -33%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
37 fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
36 fps -3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33 fps -11%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (12 - 37, n=17)
31 fps -16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (12 - 37, n=9, last 2 years)
29 fps -22%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
27 fps -27%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25 fps -32%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
12 fps -68%

一旦 TDP 达到指定值,游戏性能就会完全稳定。从下图中我们可以清楚地看到这一点,图中列出了我们在 30 分钟赛博朋克测试中使用三种不同电源配置文件时的 FPS 数值。所有数据都显示性能略有下降,但之后性能保持稳定。电池电量也是如此。

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart

05101520Tooltip
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M: Ø21.6 (20.2-22.9)
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M: Ø20.7 (19.7-21.7)
ROG Ally X Performance 17W Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M: Ø18.1 (13.1-20.5)

除了 "涡轮增压 "模式,我们还使用所有其他电源配置文件进行了游戏基准测试。如果你玩的是现代高要求游戏,如《 朋克 2077》、《对马之鬼》或《博德之门 3》,"加速 "模式会让你在流畅游戏和糟糕体验之间做出选择。总而言之,性能模式也能达到不错的帧数。而安静模式则明显较慢,需要额外调整设置。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
49 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
47.1 fps -4%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
45.7 fps -7%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
27.5 fps -44%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
31.1 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
29.6 fps -5%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
25.7 fps -17%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
17.5 fps -44%
GTA V
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
144 (6.34min, 83.3P1 - 260max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
137.9 (4.68min, 66.7P1 - 251max) fps -4%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
124.8 (13.9min, 76.9P1 - 259max) fps -13%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
100.6 (17.3min, 62.5P1 - 156.5max) fps -30%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
66.5 (11.6min, 43.5P1 - 176.5max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
65.8 (11.5min, 40P1 - 134max) fps -1%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
58.7 (2.31min, 35.7P1 - 106max) fps -12%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
41.4 (9.57min, 28.6P1 - 104.2max) fps -38%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
27.1 (7.11min, 18.9P1 - 51.4max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
26.8 (14.3min, 17.9P1 - 59.3max) fps -1%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
25.3 (3.39min, 17.2P1 - 58.6max) fps -7%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
18.6 (5.82min, 14.1P1 - 132.2max) fps -31%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
80.7 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
77.9 fps -3%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
67 fps -17%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
44.7 fps -45%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
39.6 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
38.2 fps -4%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
34.8 fps -12%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
24 fps -39%
1920x1080 High Quality
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
30 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
28.9 fps -4%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
26.6 fps -11%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
19.3 fps -36%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
70.1 (36.7min, 60.4P1 - 100.1max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
68.1 (45.3min, 59.1P1 - 112.3max) fps -3%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
64.9 (45.1min, 55.6P1 - 97.8max) fps -7%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
46.2 (34.8min, 39.1P1 - 62.1max) fps -34%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
60 (38.9min, 46.3P1 - 89.4max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
58.1 (25min, 45.3P1 - 114.1max) fps -3%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
53.9 (37.4min, 41.5P1 - 84max) fps -10%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
38.8 (26.8min, 29.1P1 - 57.4max) fps -35%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
51.6 (35.6min, 40.1P1 - 79.5max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
50 (33.4min, 39P1 - 89.2max) fps -3%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
45.1 (33.2min, 35.6P1 - 65max) fps -13%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
32.8 (23.5min, 26.1P1 - 49.4max) fps -36%
F1 23
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
79 (69min, 64P1 - 90max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
76.4 (66min, 63P1 - 88max) fps -3%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
62.5 (52min, 52P1 - 71max) fps -21%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
38.6 (32min, 31P1 - 45max) fps -51%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
56.6 (49min, 47P1 - 63max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
53.8 (47min, 45P1 - 59max) fps -5%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
44.1 (37min, 36P1 - 49max) fps -22%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
27.3 (23min, 22P1 - 31max) fps -52%
F1 24
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
75.5 (65min, 56P1 - 89max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
72.1 (62min, 55P1 - 84max) fps -5%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
61.1 (52min, 51P1 - 73max) fps -19%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
37.1 (30min, 28P1 - 45max) fps -51%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
55.1 (45min, 46P1 - 65max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
52.3 (45min, 44P1 - 60max) fps -5%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
43.8 (37min, 35P1 - 51max) fps -21%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
27.1 (23min, 22P1 - 31max) fps -51%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
44.1 (37.1min - 52.9max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
41.5 (35.1min - 49.2max) fps -6%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
33.9 (28.3min - 40.5max) fps -23%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
32.6 (22.8min - 43.3max) fps -26%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
34.3 (30min - 40.3max) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
31.1 (27min - 36.3max) fps -9%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
26.4 (22.6min - 31.4max) fps -23%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
16.3 (14min - 19.5max) fps -52%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
46 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
45 fps -2%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
40 fps -13%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
25 fps -46%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
42 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
41 fps -2%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
37 fps -12%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
23 fps -45%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
40 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
39 fps -2%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
35 fps -12%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
22 fps -45%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
41.1 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
39.2 fps -5%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
33 fps -20%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
20.2 fps -51%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
32.1 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
30.4 fps -5%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
25.7 fps -20%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
15.7 fps -51%
Forza Horizon 5
1920x1080 Medium Preset
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
78 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
74 fps -5%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
61 fps -22%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
39 fps -50%
1920x1080 High Preset
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
69 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
62 fps -10%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
60 fps -13%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
35 fps -49%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Medium Preset
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
46 fps -2%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
41 fps -13%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
27 fps -43%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
42 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
40 fps -5%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
38 fps -10%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
24 fps -43%
Ghost of Tsushima
1920x1080 Low Preset
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
36.1 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
34.9 fps -3%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
33.3 fps -8%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
10.6 fps -71%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
29.4 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
28.3 fps -4%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
24.6 fps -16%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
16.5 fps -44%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
26.1 fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
25.3 fps -3%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
21.4 fps -18%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
14.6 fps -44%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
86.9 (73.2min) fps 0%
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
86.5 (77.6min) fps
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
81.9 (72.6min) fps -5%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
61.1 (53.9min) fps -29%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
ROG Ally X Turbo 30W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
76.2 (68.4min) fps
ROG Ally X Turbo 25W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
71.9 (62.9min) fps -6%
ROG Ally X Performance 17W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
66.7 (58.8min) fps -12%
ROG Ally X Quiet 13W
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
55 (48.6min) fps -28%

此外,还可以通过附加功能提高游戏性能。例如,AMD 驱动程序提供了超级分辨率(从 720p 扩展到 1080p)和帧生成等功能。此外,还有 AMD 的 FSR 技术,但并非所有游戏都支持该技术。我们以《赛博朋克 2077》为例,介绍了 AMD 的所有功能,并通过游戏设置添加了 FSR 2.1。赛博朋克》在不久的将来也会支持 FSR 3。我们的结果清楚地表明,您可以显著提高游戏性能。对马之魂》就是一个例子,我们关闭了 AMD 驱动程序功能,并通过游戏设置使用 FSR 和帧生成功能。帧生成技术在这款游戏中的表现尤为出色,性能大幅提升,因此您可以在 1080p /High 的性能配置文件下以超过 40 帧/秒的速度进行游戏。得益于这些技术,ROG Ally X 可以轻松应对所有 AAA 级游戏。

Ghost of Tsushima (FSR 3)
功率曲线 1080p 低 1080p 中 1080p 高
性能(FSR 3) 39.8 FPS 33.4 FPS 28.8 FPS
性能(FSR 3 + FG) 59.2 FPS 52.9 FPS 44.5 FPS
Turbo (FSR 3) 42.9 FPS 36 FPS 31.4 FPS
Turbo (FSR 3 + FG) 70.9 FPS 61.6 FPS 53.8 FPS
Cybperpunk 2077 (720p RSR, Fluid Motion)
功率曲线
性能 39.9 FPS 33 FPS 30.3 FPS
性能 (FSR 2.1) 59 FPS 39.4 FPS 35.5 FPS
Turbo 52.4 FPS 38 FPS 35.3 FPS
Turbo (FSR 2.1) 64 FPS 44.2 FPS 40.9 FPS

下面的概览表显示了我们使用四种不同的电源配置文件进行的游戏基准测试。

Gaming Benchmarks Turbo (30 Watts)

lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 144.5 144 66.5 27.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 149 49 31.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 120.7 105.3 86.5 76.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 80.7 39.6 30
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 54 40.6 33.2
Far Cry 5 (2018) 78 46 42 40
Strange Brigade (2018) 161.1 70.1 60 51.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 104 47 42 37
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 113 78 69 36
F1 22 (2022) 94.9 86.7 64.6 17.8
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) 23.1 20.8 19.5 18.3
F1 23 (2023) 89.6 79 56.6 13
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 41.1 32.1 26.6 25.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 44.1 34.3 27.2 22.9
Total War Pharaoh (2023) 92.2 68 40.4 32
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) 68 57 38 37
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 29.4 26 18.7 16.3
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) 36.1 29.4 26.1 20.6
F1 24 (2024) 90.9 75.5 55.1 13.4

Gaming Benchmarks Turbo (25 Watts)

lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 141.1 137.9 65.8 26.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 47.1 29.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 114.3 93.9 86.9 71.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 77.9 38.2 28.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 39.3 27.1 28.2
Far Cry 5 (2018) 72 45 41 39
Strange Brigade (2018) 163.6 68.1 58.1 50
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 100 46 40 35
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 106 74 62 32
F1 23 (2023) 85.5 76.4 53.8 12.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 39.2 30.4 25.3 25.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 41.5 31.1 25.1 21.7
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) 34.9 28.3 25.3 19.7
F1 24 (2024) 83.4 72.1 52.3 12.6

Gaming Benchmarks Performance (17 Watts)

lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 130.4 124.8 58.7 25.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 45.7 25.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 121.3 105.2 81.9 66.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 67 34.8 26.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 51.9 38.4 32.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 73 40 37 35
Strange Brigade (2018) 156.3 64.9 53.9 45.1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 91 41 38 33
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 102 61 60 31
F1 23 (2023) 67.3 62.5 44.1 9.98
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 33 25.7 21.6 21.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 33.9 26.4 21.9 18.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) 52 39 29 27
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) 33.3 24.6 21.4 16.7
F1 24 (2024) 69 61.1 43.8 10.1

Gaming Benchmarks Quiet (13 Watts)

lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 121 100.6 41.4 18.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 27.5 17.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 116.4 102.4 61.1 55
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 44.7 24 19.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 48.7 35.6 30.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 47 25 23 22
Strange Brigade (2018) 141 46.2 38.8 32.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 61 27 24 21
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 66 39 35 19
F1 23 (2023) 43.2 38.6 27.3 6.25
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 20.2 15.7 13.8 13.5
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 32.6 16.3 13.8 11.5
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) 10.6 16.5 14.6 11.8
F1 24 (2024) 43.3 37.1 27.1 6.39

排放 - 只有涡轮增压模式(30 瓦)声音大

系统噪音

在空闲和轻度工作负载(浏览网页、YouTube 作为台式电脑)时,两个风扇通常是关闭的,也没有多余的电子声。当你开始对系统施加压力时,这完全取决于电源配置文件。主电源上的 Turbo 模式就是一个反面教材,在安静的游戏场景中会产生 43 分贝(A)的噪音。而在电池供电的 Turbo 模式下,噪音已经悦耳得多,在使用性能模式时,只有低沉的杂音(或根本没有游戏音效)。

功率曲线 3DMark 06 赛博朋克 2077 压力测试
静音 32.2 dB(A) 32.2 dB(A) 32.2 dB(A)
性能 33.8 dB(A) 33.8 dB(A) 33.8 dB(A)
涡轮增压(电池) 37.4 dB(A) 37.4 dB(A) 37.4 dB(A)
涡轮 42.6 dB(A) 42.6 dB(A) 42.6 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle
24.7 / 24.7 / 28.5 dB(A)
Load
42.6 / 42.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.341.438.641.340.442.439.32535.535.333.136.633.438.732.43130.629.433.235.529.233.728.34031.530.831.934.230.232.1325026.126.430.125.425.227.324.76326.527.626.126.228.528.625.7802724.826.82825.422.621.410028.923.529.529.221.321.73412519.339.125.222.818.919.829.716016.722.920.617.618.418.117.620019.321.723.420.618.72019.925020.624.122.321.520.622.521.131520.423.621.71917.11522.640021.226.522.12016.412.924.150022.828.523.220.816.912.524.963024.330.524.521.817.712.327.48002633.826.223.219.911.929.9100025.834.126.324.420.911.729.5125025.833.92624.118.711.329.6160021.93122.320.716.910.826.2200020.431.121.119.115.111.325.6250018.929.619.31814.211.624315020.131.220.119.31511.924.5400019.429.619.21813.512.323.9500016.428.416.815.213.812.620.5630015.324.215.714.913.412.717.8800013.922.214.613.51312.716.71000013.122.814.113.212.812.714.81250012.818.513.612.812.612.6141600012.815.313.912.81211.712.2SPL33.842.634.132.228.524.737.7N1.84.21.91.610.62.6median 20.1median 28.4median 21.7median 19.3median 16.9median 12.6median 24Delta3.64.14.23.82.72.35.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Ally X
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
Noise
3%
-7%
7%
10%
-5%
6%
off / environment *
24.7
24.2
2%
25.7
-4%
24.7
-0%
23
7%
23.3
6%
Idle Minimum *
24.7
24.7
-0%
25.7
-4%
25
-1%
23
7%
25.31
-2%
23.3
6%
Idle Average *
24.7
26.2
-6%
31.7
-28%
25
-1%
23
7%
25.31
-2%
23.3
6%
Idle Maximum *
28.5
28
2%
31.7
-11%
25
12%
25
12%
34.5
-21%
27.3
4%
Load Average *
42.6
34.2
20%
36.6
14%
31.3
27%
37
13%
34.9
18%
39.2
8%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
42.6
45.5
-7%
Load Maximum *
42.6
42.5
-0%
45.5
-7%
40.8
4%
37
13%
50.78
-19%
39.2
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43
46
39.2

* ... smaller is better

温度

风扇在顶部排风
风扇在顶部排风

由于表面温度没有问题,所以我们可以长话短说。游戏时触摸屏确实会发热,但手柄几乎不会发热,这在热敏图像上也很容易看到。顶部的风扇排气也没有问题,整个背面都非常凉爽。

Max. Load
 41.2 °C42.7 °C39.3 °C 
 40.8 °C41.9 °C39.7 °C 
 40.7 °C42.2 °C40 °C 
Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
31.4 °C39.7 °C29.9 °C
30.1 °C29.9 °C29.8 °C
29.7 °C30 °C29.8 °C
Maximum: 39.7 °C
Average: 31.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48.8 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F for the devices in the class Handheld / UMPC.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 28 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 34.6 °C / 94 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 33 °C / 91.4 F (-9.2 °C / -16.6 F).
表面温度应力测试(正面)
表面温度应力测试(正面)
表面温度应力测试(后部)
表面温度应力测试(后部)
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat
-18%
-6%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
42.7
46.6
-9%
41.8
2%
44.4
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
39.7
48
-21%
35.9
10%
37.9
5%
Idle Upper Side *
28
32.6
-16%
31.6
-13%
29.9
-7%
Idle Bottom *
27.2
33.6
-24%
33.6
-24%
28.3
-4%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

两个立体声扬声器位于机身前部,表现出色。与最初的 ROG Ally.新 Ally X 的性能仅次于 Steam Deck OLED击败。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.438.42538.731.73133.733.54032.130.75027.327.46328.627.68022.63310021.735.112519.841.616018.147.72002056.225022.557.83151562.440012.963.450012.563.763012.374.280011.977.9100011.778.2125011.376.2160010.876.1200011.376.4250011.674.2315011.976.5400012.377.6500012.676.8630012.776.4800012.777.61000012.777.31250012.669.81600011.756.6SPL24.788.2N0.677.6median 12.6median 76.1Delta2.38.335.636.635.625.227.725.223.325.823.320.821.520.821.322.821.32823.12820.923.720.920.522.420.531.31731.34316.34347.417.747.450.116.450.151.816.451.856.11656.158.513.658.564.414.964.467.415.467.469.31669.37015.8706614.86669.815.569.869.616.269.670.720.770.774.215.674.272.514.672.567.91467.965.11265.166.711.766.755.111.555.149.310.949.381.62881.649.90.949.9median 65.1median 15.6median 65.19.81.49.842.946.838.239.233.63633.335.430.434.127.334.122.834.123.74021.848.620.150.421.95922.262.617.866.31565.212.870.213.574.713.376.812.175.812.374.311.975.912.279.112.676.21376.213.476.913.571.713.872.813.768.313.964.213.756.41349.825.887.20.871.8median 13.5median 71.72.47.944.347.345.837.239.633.832.435.531.236.937.545.332.535.641.329.830.633.228.528.329.624.424.626.429.621.426.94320.83957.620.752.865.718.861.270.816.767.271.613.369.57013.168.269.111.9667111.866.972.112.469.271.412.368.472.21270.170.312.5707212.669.570.412.867.366.813.268.269.513.271.470.713.272.564.113.371.271.113.172.474.112.872.669.912.167.782.725.481.855.60.651.6median 70.3median 13.1median 68.26.12.6625.125.526.324.83526.426.830.524.72628.128.720.326.721.328.314.231.415.334.812.639.510.842.811.647.310.550.510.153.710.158.611.162.311.162.710.760.810.558.110.558.510.958.311.158.812.165.611.766.711.753.211.751.711.956.911.851.311.440.323.373.10.428.7median 11.4median 53.71.18.844.848.639.540.740.139.142.636.439.939.731.734.718.127.82035.918.635.617.639.618.945.513.746.312.149.511.661.711.964.211.968.711.269.711.666.411.666.411.868.111.868.712.271.912.6731365.313.271.613.676.213.669.713.76813.765.613.160.72582.40.550.8median 13median 66.42.17.725.12728.928.725.629.123.430.722.232.918.934.918.135.317.339.517.243.615.548.714.355.8146011.863.512.165.811.167.410.868.910.472.510.172.910.170.410.170.910.771.810.871.211.371.111.569.711.767.21268.612.167.311.965.711.754.411.249.523.382.10.555.4median 11.7median 67.31.27.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Ally XGPD Win Mini 2024 7"MSI ClawValve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Lenovo Legion GoAyaneo KunAsus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Ally X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 23% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

GPD Win Mini 2024 7" audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Claw audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Go audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Ayaneo Kun audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 现配备 80 Wh 超大容量电池

耗电量

ROG Ally X 的空闲耗电量与旧版相比略高。 ROG Ally相比略高,但这款 7 英寸手持设备仍然是最高效的设备之一。游戏时的能耗取决于电源配置文件,这在下面的图片和下表中可以看到。我们是在 APU 达到预期功耗后拍摄这些图片的(游戏开始时的数值较高)。

游戏(安静)
游戏(安静)
游戏(性能)
游戏(性能)
游戏(涡轮电池)
游戏(涡轮电池)
游戏(涡轮增压)
游戏(涡轮增压)
云游戏
云游戏
Power consumption gaming (display@ 150 nits)
功率曲线 功率消耗 APS 功率消耗系统
Leise 13 瓦 ~19-20 瓦
Leistung 17 瓦特 25.5-26.5 瓦特
Turbo Akku 25 瓦 35-36 瓦
Turbo 30 瓦特 42-43 瓦特
云游戏 8 瓦 11-12 瓦

Ally X 的实时监控不仅显示了 APU 的消耗,还显示了系统的总消耗,这对电池寿命是一个很好的指标。云游戏时的消耗数据也很有趣。我们通过 Xbox 游戏通行证测试了微软的《飞行模拟器 2020》,虽然在加载屏幕和菜单期间消耗量会相当大,但在实际游戏过程中,APU 的消耗量非常低,仅为 8 瓦(系统总消耗量为 11-12 瓦)。您还可以看到 iGPU 负载为 0%。在模拟游戏时,Ally X 的效率更高。我们玩了一些 SNES 经典游戏,如《超级马里奥》或《超级马里奥卡丁车》,系统总功耗在 8-9 瓦之间。

在压力测试中,我们测得的功耗高达 66.8 瓦,但很快就降到了 50 瓦左右。因此,随附的 65 瓦电源适配器刚好够用。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.48 / 0.73 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.3 / 6.7 / 7.5 Watt
Load midlight 48.2 / 66.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Ally X
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4"
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
Average AMD Radeon 780M
 
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Power Consumption
0%
-34%
14%
-70%
-136%
2%
-27%
-37%
Idle Minimum *
4.3
6.1
-42%
7.8
-81%
4.5
-5%
11.5
-167%
14
-226%
4.2
2%
6.11 ?(2.7 - 14, n=51)
-42%
Idle Average *
6.7
7.9
-18%
11.5
-72%
7.21
-8%
12
-79%
17.56
-162%
6.1
9%
8.32 ?(4.7 - 17.6, n=51)
-24%
Idle Maximum *
7.5
9
-20%
11.8
-57%
9.66
-29%
17.4
-132%
27
-260%
6.3
16%
10.6 ?(5.2 - 27, n=51)
-41%
Load Average *
48.2
32.6
32%
53.1
-10%
22.86
53%
45
7%
38.1
21%
56.6
-17%
56.1 ?(19.7 - 93.2, n=50)
-16%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
61.3
54.4
11%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
53.9
Load Maximum *
66.8
34.9
48%
64.6
3%
27.8
58%
54
19%
101
-51%
67.2
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
33.3
42.6
83.5
64.1

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Asus ROG Ally X; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø57.4 (49.9-66.8)
Asus ROG Ally X; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.9 (4.88-7.6)
Asus ROG Ally X; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø61.3 (54.4-62)

Power consumption external screen

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Asus ROG Ally X; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø59.6 (45.6-66.7)
Asus ROG Ally X; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø64.7 (62.3-66.8)
Asus ROG Ally X; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø30.3 (26.5-43.8)
Asus ROG Ally X; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø61.1 (59.7-66.7)
Asus ROG Ally X; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø54.9 (49.4-65.1)
Asus ROG Ally X; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.09 (7.35-9.12)
Asus ROG Ally X; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø53.9 (47.9-62.5)

电池运行时间

华硕将新款 ROG Ally 的电池容量翻了一番,从 40 Wh 增加到 80 Wh。我们已经看到了游戏过程中的消耗值,在 "涡轮增压 "模式下预计将略高于 2 小时,在 "高性能 "模式下约为 3 小时,在 "静音 "模式下约为 4 小时。我们的测试证实了这一点。在云游戏中,你可以获得 7 小时左右的时间,模拟游戏甚至可以达到 8 小时。这比原来的 ROG Ally的电池状态更加轻松。这意味着 Ally X 与 蒸汽甲板(同样是 2-4 小时,视设置而定。

在我们的默认电池测试中,Ally X 的表现也非常出色,将 80 Wh 的电池(比大多数笔记本电脑的电池容量还要大)与 7 英寸的小屏幕结合在一起,这一点也不足为奇。我们在 150 尼特(最大亮度的 43%)的 Wi-Fi 测试中,以 60 Hz 的频率运行了近 16 个小时,以 120 Hz 的频率运行了近 15 个小时。在最大亮度下,我们仍可分别使用约 12.5 小时(60 赫兹)和约 12 小时(120 赫兹)。以 150 尼特的亮度播放视频可持续 19.5 小时。

充电(65 瓦 PSU)
充电(65 瓦 PSU)
充电(100 瓦 PSU)
充电(100 瓦 PSU)

使用附带的 65 瓦适配器,设备开机后的充电时间为 128 分钟(53 分钟后可充电 50%,84 分钟后可充电 80%)。两个 USB-C 端口都支持高达 100 瓦的快速充电,据称可以缩短 0-50 % 的充电时间。显然,我们使用 100 瓦特的电源对这一说法进行了测试,可以确认充电速度更快,但电池电量也超过了 50%。充满电需要 93 分钟,只需 29 分钟就能达到 50%(51 分钟后达到 80%)。

Battery Runtime
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
2h 04min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 49min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
12h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 34min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 08min
Asus ROG Ally X
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 44 Wh
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 53 Wh
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, 50 Wh
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Battery Runtime
-35%
-47%
-41%
-62%
-49%
-52%
-42%
H.264
1174
527
-55%
568
-52%
WiFi v1.3
949
518
-45%
466
-51%
559
-41%
358
-62%
602
-37%
465
-51%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
124
76
-39%
Load
128
96
-25%
76
-41%
50
-61%
Gaming
252
97
122
Witcher 3 ultra
101
57

Pros

+ 功能强大的机箱,符合人体工程学原理
+ 可连接风扇和 M.2-2280 SSD
+ 功能强大的 AMD Zen4 SoC
+ 24 GB 内存(LPDDR5x-7467)和 1 TB 固态硬盘
+ 适用于游戏的出色ips 显示屏
+ 出色的软件集成
+ 全面的配置选项
+ 电池续航时间大幅提升
+ 快速 Wi-Fi 和 microSD 读卡器改进的输入设备和扬声器
+ 改进的输入设备和扬声器
+ 2个usb-c(1个usb 4.0)

Cons

- 涡轮增压模式下风扇噪音大(使用主电源)
- 无网络摄像头
- 显示屏亮度低于宣传的 500 尼特

结论 - ROG Ally X 是目前最好的游戏掌上电脑

评测中:华硕 ROG Ally X 测试机型由华硕德国公司提供。
评测中:华硕 ROG Ally X 测试机型由华硕德国公司提供。

最初的 ROG Ally 已经是一款非常出色的游戏手持设备,华硕利用新的 ROG Ally X 消除了第一款产品的缺点,尤其是在人体工学和电池寿命方面。新机箱的手柄更大,因此即使长时间游戏也会更加舒适。80 瓦特的大容量电池为长时间游戏提供了充足的电量,而经过调整的 "性能模式 "则是移动游戏的理想设置。你将不得不减少一些细节(尤其是现代 AAA 级游戏),但换来的是近 3 小时的运行时间和几乎听不到的风扇声。

AMD SoC 的 CPU 性能与以前基本相同,但 iGPU 得益于更快的内存,内存容量增加了 8 GB(8 GB 分配给 Radeon 780M,16 GB 分配给系统的其他部分)。得益于全面的 GPU 功能,你可以在 ROG Ally X 上流畅地游玩所有现代游戏。IPS 显示屏保持不变,120 Hz 和 VRR 等功能让它非常适合游戏。

性能更强,人体工学设计得到改善,电池续航时间更长:新款 ROG Ally X 在游戏掌上电脑中提供了最佳的整体解决方案,华硕设法解决了我们对原版 ROG Ally 的几乎所有抱怨。因此,899 欧元的较高零售价是合理的。

华硕几乎在每一个方面都对移动游戏玩家进行了改进,其整体配置目前很难被超越。除了上述优点外,您还可以获得一个普通的 M.2-2280 SSD,这使得 SSD 升级非常容易。现在还有两个 USB-C 端口,因此将 Ally X 用作小型 PC 就更加方便了。自推出最初的 ROG Ally 以来,软件实现不断改进,一切都运行得非常好。

缺点已经不多了。如果有网络摄像头就更好了,Wi-Fi 7 模块肯定已经列入下一代产品的待办事项清单。不过,我们对显示屏还不太确定,因为 IPS 面板非常适合游戏。OLED 屏幕可以改善画质,但必须放弃 VRR 等功能。IPS 屏幕的 PWM 也没有问题。处理器方面,我们很希望看到 AMD Zen5 APU,但这很可能会增加成本。我们还需要等待一周才能看到新芯片的实际性能。

在竞争对手中,新款 ROG Ally X 是最贵的机型之一,售价为 899 欧元(799 美元),但我们认为这是合理的。 微星的 Claw手持设备最近降至 749 欧元(约合 649 美元),但在许多方面根本没有那么好。蒸汽甲板 Steam Deck OLED仍然是一个强劲的竞争对手,但性能却低得多。像 Legion Go这样的设备只有在你必须拥有更大的屏幕时才有意义。对价格敏感的用户应该关注原版的 ROG Ally.它的价格已经低于 600 欧元,一旦 ROG Ally X 上架,价格很可能会进一步下降。你可以从节省下来的钱中拿出一小部分来购买大容量的移动电源,以增加电池的续航时间。

价格和供应情况

您可以从百思买以 799 美元的价格订购新款华硕 ROG Ally X。

注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.

Asus ROG Ally X - 07/22/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
85 / 98 → 87%
Mechanical Inputs
85%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
60 / 68 → 88%
Weight
80 / 69-83 → 79%
Battery
90%
Display
82%
Games Performance
52 / 75 → 70%
Application Performance
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperature
88%
Noise
82%
Audio
84 / 91 → 92%
Average
66%
85%
Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
81.2%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 40.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 ROG Ally X 评测--凭借更快的内存和 80 Wh 超大电池,成为最佳游戏掌上电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-07-22 (Update: 2024-08-15)