Notebookcheck Logo

微星Claw评测--搭载英特尔酷睿Ultra处理器的游戏掌上电脑令人失望

价格昂贵,速度太慢。

微星(MSI)发布了基于英特尔处理器的 "魔爪"(Claw)游戏掌上电脑,这在游戏掌上电脑领域算是姗姗来迟。在过去几周的几次更新后,据说它的性能得到了提升。我们对这款小巧的游戏机进行了全面测试。
AI Gaming Handheld Intel Meteor Lake Thunderbolt Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7 Windows

游戏掌上电脑目前风头正劲,各大厂商都想加入这一行列。微星也不例外,尽管它推出新款 Claw 的时间较晚,但与大多数采用 AMD 处理器的竞争对手相比,微星选择了英特尔酷睿 Ultra 处理器。它还配备了 7 英寸 IPS 显示屏、霍尔效应操纵杆和触发器。

微星目前有两种型号可供选择:Claw A1M-036 配备了 Core Ultra 5 135H、16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘,而 Claw A1M-059 则配备了更强大的 Core Ultra 7 155H16 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘,售价 899 美元。

MSI Claw (Claw Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 45 W PL2 / Short Burst, 43 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Core: 2250 MHz, RAM: 3200 MHz, 31.0.101.5522
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x-6400, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
7.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 315 PPI, Capacitive, TL070FVXS02-0, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02, 1024 GB 
, 871 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 33 x 294 x 117
Battery
53 Wh, 4700 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 6-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, 65W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
672 g, Power Supply: 341 g
Price
849 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
77.4 %
06 / 2024
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
672 g33 mm7.00"1920x1080
88.9 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
640 g49 mm7.40"1280x800
84.9 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
845 g41 mm8.80"2560x1600
87.5 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
611 g21.22 mm7.00"1920x1080
84.9 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
876 g43 mm8.40"2560x1600
85.2 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
942 g22 mm8.40"2560x1600

外壳 - 带有发光操纵杆和按钮的爪子

微星魔爪是一款典型的游戏掌上电脑,就像 华硕的 ROG Ally相比 联想Legion Go相比,它没有可拆卸控制器。微星 Claw 采用黑色塑料外壳,表面光滑,只有背面有许多风扇网罩。总体来说,它的做工不错,但也会发出一些嘎吱嘎吱的声音。另一方面,指纹痕迹也不是大问题。操纵杆周围的两个环以及右侧的按键还可以发光。宽大的黑色边框有点恼人(尤其是屏幕顶部和底部),不过由于使用了额外的外壳材料,给人的印象还是不错的。

微星 Claw(下)与华硕 ROG Ally(上)
微星 Claw(下)与华硕 ROG Ally(上)
微星 Claw(下)与华硕 ROG Ally(上)
微星 Claw(下)与华硕 ROG Ally(上)

例如,ROG Ally 的边框一样宽,但反过来,它的机箱在显示屏上方和下方要窄一些。总而言之,MSI Claw 的尺寸更大一些,手柄的形状也不同。因此,它的人体工学设计更好,尤其是大手更容易握住设备,因此比 ROG Ally 稍微舒适一些。

微星魔爪的重量为 672 克,是同类产品中较为轻巧的掌上电脑之一,即使长时间使用,重量也不会有任何问题。包括手柄在内,其外壳厚度约为 3.4 厘米。附带的 65 瓦电源重 341 克。

尺寸比较

311 mm 135 mm 43 mm 876 g298 mm 117 mm 49 mm 640 g325 mm 140 mm 22 mm 942 g299 mm 131 mm 41 mm 845 g294 mm 117 mm 33 mm 672 g280.44 mm 111.2 mm 21.22 mm 611 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 雷电 4

微星在设备顶部安装了一个 USB-C 端口,它也支持 Thunderbolt 4。我们希望看到第二个 USB 接口,以便快速连接外部固态硬盘或 U 盘等。当设备连接到主电源或与外接显示器一起供电时,这一点尤为重要。我们在进行部分测试时,将游戏机连接到了外接显示器上,只要屏幕支持通过 USB-C 供电,就能很好地工作。它没有网络摄像头,但电源按钮也可用作指纹扫描仪。

顶部:音量、3.5 毫米音频、USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4(40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery 3.0)、microSD 读卡器
顶部:音量、3.5 毫米音频、USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4(40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery 3.0)、microSD 读卡器

SD 读卡器

您可以通过在顶部的插槽中插入 microSD 卡来扩展设备的存储空间。在我们使用参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)进行的测试中,读卡器的传输速率超过了 200 MB/s,即使在从卡中复制图像文件时,我们测得的传输速率仍在 120 MB/s 左右。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
184.04 MB/s +52%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
146.02 MB/s +21%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
132.46 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
132.4 MB/s +9%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
121 MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (20.9 - 184, n=8, last 2 years)
103.5 MB/s -14%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
55 MB/s -55%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
265.8 MB/s +30%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
251.05 MB/s +23%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
204.2 MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
191.7 MB/s -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (84.6 - 260, n=7, last 2 years)
174.5 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
144.57 MB/s -29%

交流

微星为 Claw 手持设备配备了 Killer BE1750x BE200NGW,这是一款现代的 Wi-Fi 7 模块,意味着该设备已为最新的 WLAN 网络做好了准备。我们在测试中还没有使用相应的 Wi-Fi 7 路由器,但在使用华硕的参考路由器时,它的性能仍然非常出色和稳定,尽管还无法与大型笔记本电脑相比。在日常使用中,我们注意到其信号质量没有任何问题,即使下载大型游戏也不费时间。

Networking
MSI Claw
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1582 (min: 1462) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1524 (min: 1468) MBit/s ∼88%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Quectel FC66E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
917 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
999 (min: 941) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1762 (min: 1653) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1858 (min: 1771) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Go
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1561 (min: 1318) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1711 (min: 862) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1615 (min: 1509) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1789 (min: 1485) MBit/s ∼96%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1648 (min: 1587) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1735 (min: 1708) MBit/s ∼100%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1553 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1405 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1532 (min: 1497) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1397 (min: 1288) MBit/s ∼75%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
981 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1607 (min: 1530) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1753 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼94%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
MSI Claw; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1582 (1462-1660)
MSI Claw; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1524 (1468-1593)

维护

背面由六颗十字螺丝固定。按照微星设备的惯例,有一颗螺丝被贴纸覆盖,上面标有 "工厂密封 "字样。正确使用并不会使手持设备的保修失效,但由于我们的测试设备是存储设备,我们不想损坏封条。为了更换小型 M.2 2230 固态硬盘,电池和整个散热装置都必须拆卸下来,因此在重新组装时必须重新涂上散热膏。

输入设备和操作

它的主要输入方法是设备的电容式以及 "游戏手柄 "控制,如两个操纵杆、D-pad 和附加按钮。触摸屏本身可以完美运行,但仅使用触摸屏(尤其是小触摸屏)使用 Windows 仍然非常累人,而且初始设置也不是很有趣。理想情况下,您应该有一台显示器为设备供电,并可直接连接鼠标和键盘。完成 Windows 设置后,一切都将围绕制造商的软件展开--本例中就是微星的 Center M。此外,所有重要的游戏服务,如 Steam、UPlay、XBox、Epic、EA 和 Battlenet 都已集成,因此安装游戏非常方便。还有一个快速菜单,可随时显示,用于快速更改最重要的设置(能耗曲线、亮度、Wi-Fi 连接)。该菜单还具有很强的自定义功能,总体而言,Center-M 软件运行完美,似乎开发得非常出色。只有它的实时监控(三种不同模式)与左上角相连,而且 FPS 显示在我们测试的任何游戏中都不起作用。

微星中心 M - 概览
微星中心 M - 概览
微星中心 M - 控制模式
微星中心 M - 控制模式

微星采用霍尔效应模拟摇杆和触发器,因此不会出现摇杆漂移的问题。与 ROG Ally 相比,这些按键的总声音略大,触发器返回原位时发出的响声可能有点恼人。不过,我们在玩游戏时没有发现任何功能问题。

显示屏 - 7 英寸 IPS,刷新率为 120 赫兹

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
只有轻微的背光出血
只有轻微的背光出血

7 英寸 16:9 IPS 屏幕的分辨率为 1,920 x 1,080 像素。其刷新率为 120 Hz,但与 ROG Ally 不同,Claw 不支持可变刷新率。总的来说,这块屏幕给人的印象不错,不过明亮的表面容易出现轻微的颗粒感。它的响应时间又快又好,我们只注意到全亮度下有轻微的背光出血现象,而且没有 PWM 闪烁。

我们测得的最大亮度为 483 cd/m²,平均亮度为 461 cd/m²。其黑度为 0.32 cd/m²,最大对比度接近 1,500:1,表现非常出色。

483
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
TL070FVXS02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 461.3 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Contrast: 1491:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
MSI Claw
TL070FVXS02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
ANX7530 U, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4"
Lenovo Legion Go
Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
FLQ8423-24L0, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Ayaneo Kun
Ayaneo 2K, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Display
31%
24%
-2%
20%
25%
Display P3 Coverage
67
99.6
49%
92.1
37%
65.6
-2%
91.9
37%
93.52
40%
sRGB Coverage
94.4
100
6%
99.56
5%
92.1
-2%
99.3
5%
99.4
5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.4
96.1
38%
90.09
30%
67.9
-2%
81.6
18%
91.2
31%
Response Times
-17%
-122%
-3%
-211%
-154%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6)
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
2%
20.8 ?(9.4, 11.4)
-126%
10.5 ?(5, 5.5)
-14%
25.5 ?(11.5, 25)
-177%
24.2 ?(13.8, 10.4)
-163%
Response Time Black / White *
6.6 ?(3.1, 3.5)
9 ?(4.5, 4.5)
-36%
14.4 ?(7, 7.4)
-118%
6 ?(2.7, 3.3)
9%
22.73 ?(11.05, 11.67)
-244%
16.2 ?(7.6, 8.6)
-145%
PWM Frequency
360 ?(100)
700
20000
Screen
147%
-37%
-17%
-14%
-20%
Brightness middle
477
485
2%
411
-14%
513
8%
318
-33%
680
43%
Brightness
461
482
5%
413
-10%
474
3%
287
-38%
678
47%
Brightness Distribution
88
98
11%
80
-9%
84
-5%
48
-45%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.32
0.03
91%
0.42
-31%
0.38
-19%
0.1118
65%
0.5
-56%
Contrast
1491
16167
984%
979
-34%
1350
-9%
2844
91%
1360
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.6
2
23%
5.94
-128%
3.7
-42%
4.81
-85%
4
-54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
5
14%
10.56
-82%
8.3
-43%
6.93
-19%
9
-55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.5
2.95
-97%
1.53
-2%
1
33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.9
2
49%
0.92
76%
5.1
-31%
6.12
-57%
9
-131%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2 110%
1.93 114%
2.14 103%
2.003 110%
2 110%
CCT
7250 90%
6336 103%
8064 81%
7732 84%
7707 84%
7188 90%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
54% / 95%
-45% / -36%
-7% / -11%
-68% / -35%
-50% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准

微星没有提供任何色彩配置文件,在我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)进行分析时,面板显示出轻微的偏蓝,色温过低。另一方面,其色彩偏差还算正常。微星利用这些设置实现了更高的亮度。通过校准(配置文件可在上面免费下载),我们特别改善了灰阶,使偏色成为过去,但其最大亮度却低了近 50 cd/m²。sRGB 色彩空间的覆盖率为 95%,理论上你甚至可以在设备上编辑图像,但这显然不是游戏掌上电脑的实际使用场景。

对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.1 ms rise
↘ 3.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise
↘ 4.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

当然,闪亮的触摸屏上出现反光是意料之中的事,在非常明亮的日子里,使用该设备会变得有点困难。不过,在大多数情况下,你应该能找到一个合适的位置。视角方面也没有问题。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 英特尔酷睿 Ultra 处理器和 16GB 内存

如前所述,微星Claw游戏掌机可配备酷睿至尊7 155H或较弱的酷睿至尊5 135H,后者的iGPU也稍弱。两款机型均配备 16 GB 内存,且没有手动分配 VRAM 的选项。

 
 
 

测试条件

微星提供了多种能源配置文件,其中AI Engine模式默认处于激活状态。它会根据负载情况自动选择最佳设置,我们在以下基准测试中也使用了该模式。我们在下表列出了各种配置文件的 TDP 和性能值。

能源概况 TDP 主电源 TDP 电池 CB R23 multi Time Spy 显卡 赛博朋克 2077 1080p 低 最大风扇噪音排放
超级电池 20 瓦 20 瓦 7,270 点 2,581 点 23.3fps 36.6 dB(A)
平衡 35 瓦 30 瓦 12,523 点 3,517 点 31fps 45.5 dB(A)
AI 45 -> 43 瓦 35 瓦 14,463 点 3,491 点 31fps 45.5 dB(A)
极限性能 45 -> 43 瓦 35 瓦 14,550 分 4,461 分 31fps 48.5 dB(A)

还有一种手动模式,可以调整 TDP 值,但只能在 20-35 瓦的范围内调整,因此也在现有配置文件的范围内。其他手持设备在这方面提供了更大的灵活性。

能源概况
能源概况
手动模式
手动模式

处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H

酷睿至尊 7 155H 酷睿至强 7 155H英特尔新一代流星湖处理器目前被广泛应用于笔记本电脑。虽然英特尔处理器需要比其他 AMD 手持设备更多的电量才能提供与之相当的性能,但这对于手持设备来说当然并不理想。此外,它的散热装置还有很多工作要做,但我们会在稍后的排放部分详细讨论。在电池运行期间,允许处理器消耗的最大功率为 35 瓦,这就是为什么在这种情况下多核性能会降低约 14%。更多 CPU 基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1922 (1902.14-1950.08)
Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø1914 (1836.13-2049.71)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme; Turbo: Ø2271 (2104.49-2396.5)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2092 (2081.49-2100.51)
Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2405 (2346.87-2439.02)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
83.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Go -2!
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
79.1 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
78.3 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
73.6 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
72.9 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
69.8 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
69.2 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -6!
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
42.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15074 Points +4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
14960 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9769 - 19007, n=47)
14916 Points +3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14463 Points
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13224 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
13004 Points -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3984 - 15120, n=10, last 2 years)
12062 Points -17%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3984 Points -72%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1779 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1770 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1733 Points -2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1731 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1496 - 1815, n=47)
1726 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1597 - 1770, n=9, last 2 years)
1709 Points -3%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1597 Points -10%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5917 Points +23%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5825 Points +21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3798 - 7409, n=45)
5791 Points +21%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5168 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5109 Points +6%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4805 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1521 - 5917, n=8, last 2 years)
4628 Points -4%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1521 Points -68%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
692 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
684 Points
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
676 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
672 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (601 - 696, n=45)
665 Points -3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (357 - 684, n=8, last 2 years)
628 Points -8%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
622 Points -9%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
357 Points -48%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1932 - 2880, n=51)
2445 Points +25%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2439 (2346.87min - 2439.02max) Points +25%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2397 (2104.49min - 2396.5max) Points +23%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2101 (2081.49min - 2100.51max) Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2050 (1836.13min - 2049.71max) Points +5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1950 (1902.14min - 1950.08max) Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (689 - 2439, n=8, last 2 years)
1872 Points -4%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
689 Points -65%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
280 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
268 Points +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
264 Points +3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (246 - 268, n=7, last 2 years)
261 Points +2%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (99.6 - 268, n=47)
249 Points -3%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
246 Points -4%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (208 - 315, n=6, last 2 years)
248 Seconds * -1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
246 Seconds *
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
241 Seconds * +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (175 - 381, n=43)
234 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
213 Seconds * +13%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
208 Seconds * +15%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
62657 MIPS +17%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
62156 MIPS +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (41739 - 70254, n=45)
58973 MIPS +10%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
56966 MIPS +6%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
56268 MIPS +5%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
53599 MIPS
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19684 - 64454, n=8, last 2 years)
51738 MIPS -3%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
19684 MIPS -63%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6316 MIPS +19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5682 MIPS +7%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5490 MIPS +3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3653 - 6077, n=7, last 2 years)
5438 MIPS +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4795 - 5621, n=45)
5343 MIPS 0%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5318 MIPS
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3653 MIPS -31%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (7732 - 13656, n=50)
12279 Points +17%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
11727 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10990 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10872 Points +4%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10464 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4587 - 12026, n=9, last 2 years)
9018 Points -14%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7778 Points -26%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7427 Points -29%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4587 Points -56%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2538 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2530 Points +4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2530 Points +4%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2433 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1901 - 2473, n=47)
2378 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1348 - 2550, n=9, last 2 years)
2294 Points -6%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2243 Points -8%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2194 Points -10%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1348 Points -45%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (10017 - 13556, n=47)
12016 Points +19%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10917 Points +8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10076 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
9803 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
9589 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4457 - 10713, n=9, last 2 years)
8486 Points -16%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8389 Points -17%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7743 Points -23%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4457 Points -56%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1956 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1898 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1896 Points +7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1780 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1462 - 1824, n=47)
1753 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1355 - 1917, n=9, last 2 years)
1721 Points -3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1622 Points -9%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1486 Points -17%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1355 Points -24%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
18.6 fps +27%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.4 fps +25%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9.93 - 21.2, n=45)
16.4 fps +12%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
16.3 fps +11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (12.5 - 18.7, n=7, last 2 years)
15.9 fps +8%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15.8 fps +7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14.7 fps
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
57.8 s * -25%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
53.5 s * -16%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
52.3 s * -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (46.2 - 57.8, n=7, last 2 years)
51.2 s * -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40.9 - 79.2, n=44)
49 s * -6%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.2 s *
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
43 s * +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4945 sec * -6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4912 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (0.4457 - 0.53, n=44)
0.4819 sec * -3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4795 sec * -3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.4601 - 0.4945, n=8, last 2 years)
0.475 sec * -2%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4665 sec *
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4662 sec * -0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4447 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1950 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
149.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
256 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4805 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
684 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1770 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
14463 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
95.2 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
86.7 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
82.8 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
78.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
73.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
65.6 pt
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
57 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
25901 KRay/s +140%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
25652 KRay/s +138%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
24067 KRay/s +123%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
21814 KRay/s +102%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
20714 KRay/s +92%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (10795 - 25901, n=8, last 2 years)
20412 KRay/s +89%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6670 - 18470, n=45)
13101 KRay/s +21%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10795 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
109745 Points +89%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
108496 Points +87%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
102584 Points +77%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91595 Points +58%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (58068 - 109745, n=8, last 2 years)
87639 Points +51%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
86738 Points +49%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40905 - 93181, n=45)
69488 Points +20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
58068 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4847 MB/s +79%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4777 MB/s +76%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
4420 MB/s +63%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4211 MB/s +56%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2707 - 4847, n=8, last 2 years)
3964 MB/s +46%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
3854 MB/s +42%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1940 - 4436, n=45)
3244 MB/s +20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
2707 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
114294 Points +65%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
113343 Points +63%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
106595 Points +54%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
99496 Points +43%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (69419 - 114294, n=8, last 2 years)
95967 Points +38%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
95153 Points +37%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64698 - 94181, n=45)
83491 Points +20%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69419 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
14822 Points +75%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
14596 Points +72%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
14070 Points +66%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13607 Points +61%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12936 Points +53%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8463 - 14822, n=8, last 2 years)
12710 Points +50%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (5639 - 10647, n=45)
9119 Points +8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8463 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
58482 Points +107%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
57426 Points +103%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
54962 Points +95%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
48428 Points +71%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (28245 - 58482, n=8, last 2 years)
46269 Points +64%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
46180 Points +63%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (18236 - 47685, n=45)
33738 Points +19%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
28245 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
166333 MB/s +178%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
165008 MB/s +176%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
149047 MB/s +149%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (57678 - 166333, n=8, last 2 years)
107225 MB/s +79%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (45713 - 152179, n=45)
78240 MB/s +31%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76146 MB/s +27%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
59882 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
57678 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
1047 MB/s +32%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
958 MB/s +20%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
964 MB/s +21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (557 - 1250, n=45)
960 MB/s +21%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
899 MB/s +13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (654 - 1047, n=8, last 2 years)
854 MB/s +7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
796 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
687 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13846 KRay/s +142%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13765 KRay/s +140%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12875 KRay/s +125%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
11335 KRay/s +98%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
10740 KRay/s +87%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5732 - 13846, n=8, last 2 years)
10740 KRay/s +87%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3569 - 9802, n=45)
6848 KRay/s +19%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
5732 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
49287 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (32719 - 54223, n=45)
46541 MPixel/s -6%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
37540 MPixel/s -24%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
34764 MPixel/s -29%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (26622 - 49287, n=8, last 2 years)
34547 MPixel/s -30%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
30576 MPixel/s -38%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
29573 MPixel/s -40%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
26622 MPixel/s -46%

系统性能

除了 Windows 的触控操作仍然比较笨拙之外,微星 Claw 是一款配备现代组件的快速设备。在测试过程中,我们也没有遇到死机或其他限制问题。此外,在合成测试中也没有遇到瓶颈。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
6907 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5159 - 7529, n=32)
6732 Points +4%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
6504 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
6439 Points -1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5866 - 7149, n=8, last 2 years)
6366 Points -2%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6330 Points -3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
5900 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8580 - 11289, n=32)
10563 Points +10%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10296 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
10081 Points +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (9068 - 10633, n=8, last 2 years)
9753 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9610 Points
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
9483 Points -1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
9247 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10074 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
8996 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (7822 - 10591, n=32)
8749 Points +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7323 - 9912, n=8, last 2 years)
8585 Points +3%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
8346 Points
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8089 Points -3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
7323 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9311 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (4985 - 10709, n=32)
9011 Points -3%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8975 Points -4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
8621 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7204 - 9408, n=8, last 2 years)
8402 Points -10%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
8233 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
7990 Points -14%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1718 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1693 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1366 - 1903, n=32)
1655 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (840 - 1693, n=7, last 2 years)
1390 Points -18%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1366 Points -19%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1340 Points -21%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
840 Points -50%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1662 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1649 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1291 - 1798, n=31)
1581 Points -4%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1429 Points -13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1416 Points -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (874 - 1649, n=7, last 2 years)
1407 Points -15%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
874 Points -47%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1878 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1519 - 1929, n=31)
1817 Points +1%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1795 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (808 - 1868, n=7, last 2 years)
1421 Points -21%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1278 Points -29%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1272 Points -29%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
808 Points -55%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1538 Points
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1479 Points -4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1451 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (939 - 1802, n=31)
1396 Points -9%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1309 Points -15%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (831 - 1538, n=7, last 2 years)
1270 Points -17%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
831 Points -46%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
432 Points +57%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
300 Points +9%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
276 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (252 - 299, n=32)
276 Points 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (188.4 - 306, n=8, last 2 years)
258 Points -7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
230 Points -17%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
228 Points -17%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
188.4 Points -32%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
277 Points +9%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
255 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (234 - 309, n=27)
254 Points 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (107 - 255, n=5, last 2 years)
197.2 Points -23%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
179.4 Points -30%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
107 Points -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
746 ms * -41%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
565 ms * -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (516 - 746, n=8, last 2 years)
563 ms * -6%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
556 ms * -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (517 - 614, n=33)
541 ms * -2%
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
529 ms *
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
518 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
6504 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92447 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 96791, n=45)
83293 MB/s +2%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
81717 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76512 MB/s -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (32617 - 81717, n=9, last 2 years)
56912 MB/s -30%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
45357 MB/s -44%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
45279 MB/s -45%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
43750 MB/s -46%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
32617 MB/s -60%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80481 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (60544 - 90647, n=45)
79984 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
55710 MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
50337 MB/s -37%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25380 - 80481, n=8, last 2 years)
49150 MB/s -39%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
48348 MB/s -40%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
37657 MB/s -53%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25380 MB/s -68%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
108872 MB/s +44%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92869 MB/s +23%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75350 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (58692 - 93451, n=45)
72558 MB/s -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25596 - 108872, n=10, last 2 years)
65858 MB/s -13%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
50079 MB/s -34%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49922 MB/s -34%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49426 MB/s -34%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49797 MB/s -34%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25596 MB/s -66%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (120.2 - 233, n=45)
144.2 ns * -3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
139.6 ns *
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
134.4 ns * +4%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.2 ns * +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.3 ns * +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112.6 - 139.6, n=9, last 2 years)
127.1 ns * +9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
119.5 ns * +14%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
113.7 ns * +19%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
112.6 ns * +19%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出一些限制。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2293.5 μs *
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1421.6 μs * +38%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
995 μs * +57%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
744.2 μs * +68%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Claw 配备了一块紧凑型 M.2 2230 固态硬盘(我们使用的是 Kioxia 的 BG5 固态硬盘),存储容量为 1 TB,用户在首次启动设备后可自由使用 871 GB。虽然它是 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘,但其最大传输速率最多只有 3.5 GB/s,我们的基准测试结果也大多显示在 3 GB/s 左右。不过,对于游戏掌上电脑来说,这已经完全足够了,即使在长时间负载的情况下,我们也没有发现性能下降。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。

Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3303 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2935 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 535 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 401 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 75.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 226 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 842 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1873 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 -11!
 
88.9 pt
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
68.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
63.2 pt
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
57.9 pt
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
 
57.9 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
56.1 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -11!
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
44.4 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
42 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
5565 (3733.98min - 5564.79max) MB/s +93%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
4421 (4398.57min - 4420.59max) MB/s +54%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
4132 (2139.64min - 4132.14max) MB/s +44%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2878 (2833.46min - 2878.46max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
2878 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (431 - 5565, n=9, last 2 years)
2767 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
2106 (2093.38min - 2106.19max) MB/s -27%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
463 (318.56min - 463.17max) MB/s -84%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
431 (334.87min - 430.55max) MB/s -85%
seq write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
5102 (4976.45min - 5101.6max) MB/s +85%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3804 (1734.97min - 3803.55max) MB/s +38%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2758 (2188.17min - 2758.38max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
2758 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (259 - 5102, n=9, last 2 years)
2189 MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1644 (1600.76min - 1644.1max) MB/s -40%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1056 (164.42min - 1056.34max) MB/s -62%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
263 (255.13min - 262.56max) MB/s -90%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (118.2min - 258.69max) MB/s -91%
seq q8 t1 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
7005 (6255.88min - 7004.74max) MB/s +185%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6987 (616.14min - 6987.16max) MB/s +184%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6320 (613min - 6319.71max) MB/s +157%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
5068 (4682.73min - 5068.47max) MB/s +106%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2458 - 7005, n=9, last 2 years)
4671 MB/s +90%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
4274 (3828.24min - 4274.42max) MB/s +74%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
3760 (2910.85min - 3760.19max) MB/s +53%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2458 (2277.98min - 2458.28max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
2458 MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
6151 (6074.61min - 6150.81max) MB/s +114%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3894 (3354.39min - 3893.57max) MB/s +36%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2871 (2238.71min - 2871max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
2871 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (256 - 6151, n=9, last 2 years)
2441 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1790 (1750.28min - 1789.5max) MB/s -38%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1088 (990.07min - 1088.21max) MB/s -62%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (256.06min - 258.58max) MB/s -91%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
256 (243.34min - 256.39max) MB/s -91%
4k q1 t1 read
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
97.4 (60.76min - 97.44max) MB/s +43%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
72.2 (70.46min - 72.23max) MB/s +6%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
68 (66.96min - 68max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
68 MB/s 0%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
64.2 (61.66min - 64.21max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (37.3 - 97.4, n=9, last 2 years)
58.8 MB/s -14%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
39.1 (33.75min - 39.14max) MB/s -42%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
37.3 (36.41min - 37.3max) MB/s -45%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
33.4 (33.02min - 33.38max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
226 (185.56min - 226.08max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
226 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
210 (193.2min - 209.71max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
202 (192.69min - 202.49max) MB/s -11%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
192.3 (177.32min - 192.31max) MB/s -15%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
164.6 (149.63min - 164.58max) MB/s -27%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
181.4 (169.88min - 181.36max) MB/s -20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112.3 - 226, n=10, last 2 years)
168.7 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
151.3 (148.2min - 151.25max) MB/s -33%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
112.3 (81.5min - 112.29max) MB/s -50%
4k q32 t16 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
4025 (4006.61min - 4024.99max) MB/s +87%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2148 (2142.5min - 2147.8max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
2148 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1943 (1054.45min - 1942.86max) MB/s -10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (86 - 4025, n=9, last 2 years)
1302 MB/s -39%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
984 (894.6min - 983.67max) MB/s -54%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
407 (296.91min - 406.67max) MB/s -81%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
150.3 (144.83min - 150.29max) MB/s -93%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
86 (58.25min - 86max) MB/s -96%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
2871 (1656.3min - 2870.9max) MB/s +430%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
2452 (2245.51min - 2452.41max) MB/s +352%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (89.1 - 2871, n=9, last 2 years)
859 MB/s +58%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
542 (404.55min - 542.06max) MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
542 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
434 (400.52min - 433.94max) MB/s -20%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
262 MB/s -52%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (220.73min - 258.5max) MB/s -52%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
89.1 (82.16min - 89.09max) MB/s -84%
AS SSD
Score Total
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8425 Points +88%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2412 - 8425, n=5, last 2 years)
4799 Points +7%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
4480 Points
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
4480 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3969 Points -11%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3522 Points -21%
Score Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
2527 Points +15%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2189 Points
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
2189 Points 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (842 - 2527, n=5, last 2 years)
1664 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1447 Points -34%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1319 Points -40%
Score Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
4632 Points +278%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1161 - 4632, n=5, last 2 years)
2324 Points +90%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1814 Points +48%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1623 Points +32%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1225 Points
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
1225 Points 0%
Seq Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
5260 MB/s +102%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
4140.35 MB/s +59%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2183 - 5260, n=5, last 2 years)
3542 MB/s +36%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3395 MB/s +31%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2601 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
2601 MB/s 0%
Seq Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
4573 MB/s +227%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3282.76 MB/s +135%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1397 - 4573, n=5, last 2 years)
2588 MB/s +85%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1397 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
1397 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1370 MB/s -2%
4K Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
73.2 MB/s +13%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
64.6 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
64.6 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
55.21 MB/s -15%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (34 - 73.2, n=5, last 2 years)
54.9 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
44.6 MB/s -31%
4K Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
218 MB/s +9%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
200 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
200 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (90.7 - 218, n=5, last 2 years)
165.5 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
150.68 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
130 MB/s -35%
4K-64 Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1928 MB/s +3%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1864 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
1864 MB/s 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (590 - 1928, n=5, last 2 years)
1255 MB/s -33%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
977.4 MB/s -48%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
935 MB/s -50%
4K-64 Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
3957 MB/s +347%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (885 - 3957, n=5, last 2 years)
1900 MB/s +115%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1356 MB/s +53%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1335.19 MB/s +51%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
885 MB/s
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
885 MB/s 0%
Access Time Read
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
0.122 ms * -79%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.029 - 0.151, n=5, last 2 years)
0.08 ms * -18%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.068 ms *
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
0.068 ms * -0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.036 ms * +47%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
0.029 ms * +57%
Access Time Write
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.115 ms * -448%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.016 - 0.067, n=5, last 2 years)
0.03 ms * -43%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
0.024 ms * -14%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.021 ms *
Average Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
  ()
0.021 ms * -0%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
0.016 ms * +24%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
MSI Claw; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2087 (1879.68-2146.44)

图形卡

我们的测试设备配备了 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H配备了快速 Arc Graphics iGPU配备 8 个 Xe 内核,最高时钟频率可达 2.25 GHz。在合成 3DMark 测试中,英特尔的性能比旧版的 Iris Xe Graphics G7和 AMD 的 Radeon 780M也险胜。iGPU 可以很好地胜任播放高分辨率视频等日常任务。

该设备的图形性能在电池使用和连续负载情况下均保持稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
96.1 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
90.3 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
89.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
89.3 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
84.9 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
83.9 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
79.7 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -4!
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
34.5 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13073 Points +7%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12795 Points +5%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12205 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12162 Points 0%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
12043 Points -1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (10150 - 13828, n=7, last 2 years)
12019 Points -2%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8064 - 13716, n=35)
11984 Points -2%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8618 Points
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8373 Points -3%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5568 - 9692, n=39)
8302 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7974 Points -7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7971 Points -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6683 - 8775, n=10, last 2 years)
7968 Points -8%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7865 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3491 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (2018 - 3770, n=42)
3231 Points -7%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2913 Points -17%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2444 - 3491, n=10, last 2 years)
2883 Points -17%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2866 Points -18%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2854 Points -18%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2646 Points -24%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
37654 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
37459 Points +14%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
34906 Points +7%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32770 Points
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
30147 Points -8%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
22965 Points -30%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (17193 - 37639, n=41)
30130 Points -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13008 - 38330, n=11, last 2 years)
27243 Points -17%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
20987 Points -36%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
13008 Points -60%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
13008 Points -60%
Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35645 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (17911 - 39941, n=41)
32332 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
30626 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
30310 Points -15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
29920 Points -16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (23660 - 35645, n=8, last 2 years)
28652 Points -20%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
27153 Points -24%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
26185 Points -27%
3DMark 11 Performance
12271 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7988 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3829 points
Help
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
446 Seconds * -2%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
437 Seconds *
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (294 - 692, n=38)
430 Seconds * +2%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
417 Seconds * +5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
332 Seconds * +24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (332 - 517, n=8, last 2 years)
417 Seconds * +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
385 Seconds * +12%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
366 Seconds * +16%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

现在该谈谈这款掌上电脑的游戏性能了。在这方面,微星魔爪未能重现其在合成测试中取得的良好 GPU 性能,相反,它在几乎所有游戏中都落后于 AMD 竞争对手。它只能在 Steam Deck 中胜出。这就意味着,在 1080p 原生分辨率下,你只能玩很多中高分辨率的游戏和要求较高的游戏,如 赛博朋克 2077Baldurs Gate 3 等要求较高的游戏,如果不使用升频技术,即使在低细节设置下也很难运行。此外,与 AMD 软件相比,英特尔驱动程序提供的可进一步提高性能或描绘质量的功能(如帧生成)较少。

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
91.6 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
90.2 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
90.1 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
87.9 pt
MSI Claw -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
87.8 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
85.3 pt
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -3!
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
66.2 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
33.9 fps +32%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
29.5 (28min, 28P1) fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.4 (27min, 28P1) fps +15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 (24min, 26P1) fps +7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (17.5 - 33.9, n=10, last 2 years)
27.4 fps +7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.6 fps
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 (3.65min, 16.9P1) fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.5 (1.496min, 15.9P1) fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.7 (3min, 16.9P1) fps
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.3 (3.57min, 16.1P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 (7.24min, 13.5P1) fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.6 - 27.1, n=10, last 2 years)
24.7 fps
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
19.5 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.6 fps +13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.3 fps +11%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.7 fps +9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.3 fps +7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.4 - 30, n=11, last 2 years)
25.6 fps +1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.4 fps
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
18.4 fps -28%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
49.1 (35.6min, 38.9P1) fps +7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
48.6 (29.1min, 38.3P1) fps +6%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
46.3 (8.7min, 11.5P1) fps +1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30 - 51.6, n=11, last 2 years)
44 fps -4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
42.6 (7.5min, 9.94P1) fps -7%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
30 fps -35%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
78.7 (68.6min) fps +24%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
75.5 (67.6min) fps +19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (55 - 78.7, n=11, last 2 years)
64.5 fps +1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
63.6 (41.1min) fps
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
60.4 (54.6min) fps -5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
59.7 (52.4min) fps -6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
58.6 (51.9min) fps -8%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
38.9 fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33.8 fps -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24.5 - 38.9, n=11, last 2 years)
30.2 fps -22%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.9 fps -23%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.6 fps -29%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 fps -31%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.5 fps -37%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
20.3 fps +3%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (13 - 24.7, n=24)
20.3 fps +3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
19.8 (16.6min) fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (11.5 - 22.9, n=6, last 2 years)
18.6 fps -6%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29 fps +32%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.3 (18.4min) fps +25%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.8 (18.7min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
23.8 fps +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.8 - 29, n=12, last 2 years)
23.2 fps +6%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
22.1 (9.85min) fps +1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
21.9 (18.9min) fps
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (7.3 - 27.6, n=32)
21.7 fps -1%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
21.13 fps -4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42 fps +35%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
41 fps +32%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (31 - 49.5, n=3)
38.8 fps +25%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
38 fps +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24 - 42, n=9, last 2 years)
35.3 fps +14%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
32 fps +3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
31 fps
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
28 fps -10%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
36 fps +33%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (27 - 48.2, n=3)
35.2 fps +30%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
35 fps +30%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33 fps +22%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (12 - 37, n=9, last 2 years)
29 fps +7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
27 fps
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25 fps -7%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
12 fps -56%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45 (31min) fps +22%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
44 (31min) fps +19%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
40 fps +8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
37 fps
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (22 - 50, n=32)
36.9 fps 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (23 - 45, n=11, last 2 years)
36.7 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
36 (32min) fps -3%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
27 fps -27%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43 (31min) fps +26%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42 (31min) fps +24%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
37 fps +9%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (25 - 46, n=32)
34.7 fps +2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (22 - 43, n=11, last 2 years)
34.5 fps +1%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
34 fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33 (20min) fps -3%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
23 fps -32%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
31.4 fps +27%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
30.8 fps +24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (15.7 - 32.1, n=8, last 2 years)
26.9 fps +8%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (16.3 - 31.1, n=22)
25.9 fps +4%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.8 fps
1920x1080 High Preset
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 fps +33%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 fps +21%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (15.4 - 27.7, n=22)
22.6 fps +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.8 - 27.5, n=8, last 2 years)
22.4 fps +8%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.7 fps

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

012345678910111213141516171819Tooltip
MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø16.8 (12.2-19.3)

我们的《 赛博朋克 2077 》循环测试表明,微星手持设备的游戏性能在长时间负载下保持不变。此外,我们还使用各种能耗曲线测试了其游戏性能,并在下表中总结了我们的发现。高效模式 "超级电池 "非常适合较老或要求不高的游戏,否则其性能就会不足。

游戏(1080p) 超级电池 均衡 AI 极致性能
Witcher 3 (超) 20.7fps 25.8fps 25.6fps 25.6fps
远征 5》(超) 28fps 32fps 34fps 33fps
古墓丽影:暗影》(超) 23fps 27fps 27fps 26fps
GTA V》(高) 34.2fps 40.8fps 39.6fps 39.6fps
赛博朋克 2077》(低) 23.3fps 31fps 30.9fps 31.1fps
博德斯之门 3》(低) 28.7fps 33.1fps 31.7fps 33.3fps
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 158.1 147.9 39.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 135 51 25.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 98.6 84.1 67.4 63.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 58.5 35.9 25.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 51.6 45.1 38.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 67 40 37 34
Strange Brigade (2018) 163 71 59 46
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 69 33 31 27
F1 23 (2023) 64.4 59.4 41.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 31.7 24.8 20.7 20.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 30.9 25.3 21.9 19.8
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 52 34 29 25

排放物 - 烦人的风扇

噪音排放

由两个风扇组成的散热装置设法维持了英特尔处理器的高功率极限,但其结果是游戏手持设备的风扇几乎一直在运转--即使在使用最高效模式时也是如此。真正停用风扇的情况比较少见,正常情况下,即使手持设备处于空转状态,也会发出嘶嘶声。在负载情况下,情况会变得更糟,微星魔爪也会成为噪音最大的设备之一。我们在游戏时测得的噪音为 45-48 dB(A),而在使用最高效的超级电池模式(20 瓦 TDP)时仍略低于 37 dB(A)。

能量曲线 赛博朋克 2077 自由魅影 压力测试 最大电池工作状态
超级电池 36.6 dB(A) 36.6 dB(A) 36.6 dB(A)
平衡 45.5 dB(A) 45.5 dB(A) 45.5 dB(A)
AI 45.5 dB(A) 45.5 dB(A) 45.5 dB(A)
极端性能 48.5 dB(A) 48.5 dB(A) 46.3 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle
25.7 / 31.7 / 31.7 dB(A)
Load
36.6 / 45.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.745.543.242.945.62536.734.238.138.240.43132.529.737.333.634.14033.530.232.233.331.55031.730.530.130.429.96333.932.726.927.328.18027.726.42422.82610024.724.124.723.725.412526.222.722.321.825.916025.421.120.920.124.820026.223.322.621.924.825027.323.922.522.225.331530.824.124.317.827.440026.420.819.31525.450029.220.621.112.827.363029.123.218.113.528.580032.223.719.613.330.4100031.825.619.512.132.7125033.226.52212.332.6160035.329.525.211.934.9200036.128.918.912.236.8250039.424.417.512.636.8315034.321.617.11332.7400030.620.214.913.429.4500029.517.514.313.529.9630025.616.714.913.827.4800019.914.614.113.7221000017.614.914.313.919.21250018.216.115.513.720.11600014.914.113.51316.7SPL45.536.631.725.844.5N4.62.21.50.84.3median 29.1median 22.7median 19.3median 13.5median 27.4Delta3.83.43.52.43.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Claw
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
Noise
12%
15%
11%
9%
1%
off / environment *
25.7
24.7
4%
23
11%
23.3
9%
24.4
5%
Idle Minimum *
25.7
25
3%
23
11%
23.3
9%
24.4
5%
25.31
2%
Idle Average *
31.7
25
21%
23
27%
23.3
26%
24.4
23%
25.31
20%
Idle Maximum *
31.7
25
21%
25
21%
27.3
14%
30.6
3%
34.5
-9%
Load Average *
36.6
31.3
14%
37
-1%
39.2
-7%
36
2%
34.9
5%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
45.5
Load Maximum *
45.5
40.8
10%
37
19%
39.2
14%
39.3
14%
50.78
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
39.2

* ... smaller is better

温度

顶部有风扇出口
顶部有风扇出口

Claw 中部区域的发热量很大,但这并不重要,因为手柄始终保持凉爽,而且我们在玩游戏时没有发现任何限制。风扇出风口位于顶部,因此不碍事。在压力测试中,处理器的运行功率曾一度达到 45 瓦,然后稳定在 43 瓦。

CPU/iGPU 数据压力测试
CPU/iGPU 数据压力测试
Max. Load
 41.3 °C40.9 °C39.6 °C 
 41.2 °C41.3 °C39.9 °C 
 41.7 °C41.8 °C39.5 °C 
Maximum: 41.8 °C
Average: 40.8 °C
33.6 °C35.9 °C33.5 °C
29.6 °C34.8 °C31.7 °C
29.7 °C34.1 °C31.7 °C
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 32.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F for the devices in the class Handheld / UMPC.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.5 °C / 101 F, ranging from 28 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 37.4 °C / 99 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 34.2 °C / 94 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 31.9 °C / 89.4 F (-9.9 °C / -17.8 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)

发言人

正面的两个立体声扬声器效果相当不错,声音非常响亮。不过,在玩游戏时仍然很难阻挡持续的风扇噪音。声音很清晰,但缺乏一些冲击力,其他掌上电脑也是如此。ROG Ally ROG Ally与之水平相当,但 Valve 的 蒸汽甲板 OLED表现略胜一筹。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.946.82538.239.23133.6364033.335.45030.434.16327.334.18022.834.110023.74012521.848.616020.150.420021.95925022.262.631517.866.34001565.250012.870.263013.574.780013.376.8100012.175.8125012.374.3160011.975.9200012.279.1250012.676.231501376.2400013.476.9500013.571.7630013.872.8800013.768.31000013.964.21250013.756.4160001349.8SPL25.887.2N0.871.8median 13.5median 71.7Delta2.47.925.12728.928.725.629.123.430.722.232.918.934.918.135.317.339.517.243.615.548.714.355.8146011.863.512.165.811.167.410.868.910.472.510.172.910.170.410.170.910.771.810.871.211.371.111.569.711.767.21268.612.167.311.965.711.754.411.249.523.382.10.555.4median 11.7median 67.31.27.125.125.526.324.83526.426.830.524.72628.128.720.326.721.328.314.231.415.334.812.639.510.842.811.647.310.550.510.153.710.158.611.162.311.162.710.760.810.558.110.558.510.958.311.158.812.165.611.766.711.753.211.751.711.956.911.851.311.440.323.373.10.428.7median 11.4median 53.71.18.844.347.345.837.239.633.832.435.531.236.937.545.332.535.641.329.830.633.228.528.329.624.424.626.429.621.426.94320.83957.620.752.865.718.861.270.816.767.271.613.369.57013.168.269.111.9667111.866.972.112.469.271.412.368.472.21270.170.312.5707212.669.570.412.867.366.813.268.269.513.271.470.713.272.564.113.371.271.113.172.474.112.872.669.912.167.782.725.481.855.60.651.6median 70.3median 13.1median 68.26.12.66hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI ClawAsus ROG Ally Z1 ExtremeLenovo Legion GoValve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Claw audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Go audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 电池寿命短

耗电量

微星的游戏手持设备并不特别高效。在全亮状态下,测试设备空闲时的耗电量已经达到 12 瓦。在压力测试中,它只在瞬间达到 65 瓦,几秒钟后才平衡在 54 瓦左右。在游戏时,它的功率也达到了 55 瓦左右,因此附带的 65 瓦电源已经足够强劲。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.18 / 0.42 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.8 / 11.5 / 11.8 Watt
Load midlight 53.1 / 64.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4"
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Power Consumption
42%
-13%
26%
16%
-58%
4%
9%
Idle Minimum *
7.8
4.5
42%
11.5
-47%
4.2
46%
6.66
15%
14
-79%
Idle Average *
11.5
7.21
37%
12
-4%
6.1
47%
7.11
38%
17.56
-53%
8.64 ?(4.2 - 16, n=37)
25%
Idle Maximum *
11.8
9.66
18%
17.4
-47%
6.3
47%
11.7
1%
27
-129%
12.1 ?(4.5 - 49, n=37)
-3%
Load Average *
53.1
22.86
57%
45
15%
56.6
-7%
46.708
12%
38.1
28%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
54.4
Load Maximum *
64.6
27.8
57%
54
16%
67.2
-4%
56.7
12%
101
-56%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.6
64.1
53.1
83.5

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
MSI Claw; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø53.4 (52.1-64.5)
MSI Claw; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.74 (8.62-11)
MSI Claw; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø54.4 (50.2-56.2)

运行时间

充电曲线
充电曲线

微星在该设备中安装了一块 53 瓦时的电池,因此我们当然要进行正常的电池测试。在 WLAN 测试中,两款产品的表现不相上下,但在视频测试中,Claw 手持设备不得不向电池容量更小的 ROG Ally 认输。另一方面,更重要的是玩游戏时的电池续航时间,在玩 AAA 级游戏时,测试大约进行了 80 分钟就结束了。使用 "超级电池"模式(20 瓦 TDP)可以玩得更久一些,但这样就必须进一步降低分辨率和细节,像《赛博朋克 2077》这样的游戏即使在低细节的 1080p 下也无法流畅运行。另一方面,对于模拟器来说,我们希望能手动进一步降低 TDP,以便让运行时间达到数小时。在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要 106 分钟;大约一小时后,80% 的电量可以恢复。

Battery Runtime
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
1h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 46min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
6h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 16min
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 53 Wh
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED
Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, 50 Wh
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 65 Wh
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Battery Runtime
20%
-23%
4%
39%
-3%
16%
H.264
527
568
8%
WiFi v1.3
466
559
20%
358
-23%
465
0%
648
39%
602
29%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
76
Load
76
50
-34%
Witcher 3 ultra
57
72
101

Pros

+ 机箱稳定,操纵杆/按钮性能良好
+ 120 赫兹显示屏
+ 良好的手持软件
+ 快速 microSD 读卡器
+ TB4 和 Wi-Fi 7

Cons

- 低效的英特尔处理器
- 游戏性能相对较弱
- 风扇声音大,风扇活动频繁

结论--微星魔爪因英特尔流星湖处理器而受挫

微星Claw评测。测试设备由提供:
微星Claw评测。测试设备由提供:

在我们的全面测试中,MSI Claw 游戏掌上电脑并未给我们留下深刻印象。总体而言,它的概念与一年多前发布的配备 7 英寸显示屏的华硕 ROG Ally 相似。不过,微星没有采用 AMD 芯片,而是采用了英特尔 Meteor Lake 处理器。这带来了一些问题,也说明了为什么其他制造商没有采取同样的路线。尽管功耗较高,但它的游戏性能却比其他 AMD 手持设备稍差,同时,它的散热装置也很吃力。风扇几乎总是处于工作状态,总的来说,Claw 是市场上噪音最大的掌上电脑之一。

另一方面,微星Claw在其他方面,如操纵杆/按钮和游戏软件,给我们留下了良好的印象。它的屏幕整体表现不错,即使我们希望看到可变的刷新率。此外,如果能增加一个 USB 接口就更好了。理论上,它的 M.2 2230 固态硬盘是可以更换的,但要更换的话,就必须拆开整个机箱,装回去时甚至还得重新贴上散热膏。

微星Claw游戏掌机深刻地证明了目前的英特尔CPU并不适合游戏掌机。与 AMD 竞争对手相比,英特尔掌机的游戏性能较弱,而且价格较高,因此不值得推荐。

微星似乎已经发现了这一问题,在发布 Claw 仅三个月后,就发布了它的 继任者它将配备更大的显示屏、更高效的英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器和更快的 iGPU。不过,这款产品的发布还需要几个月的时间。

由于其超过 800 美元的高价,购买 Claw 手持设备完全没有意义。更大的 Legion Go售价仅为 750 美元(使用较小的固态硬盘),甚至连 ROG Ally的价格也低于 700 美元。此外,它的继任者 ROG Ally X-已经在下个月推出,它将有重大改进(更舒适的外壳、80 瓦时电池、1 TB M.2 2280 固态硬盘、24 GB 内存、2 倍 USB),售价仅不到 1000 美元。最新的 蒸汽甲板 OLED固态硬盘的价格也便宜很多,约为 630 美元。

请注意:我们已经更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。

价格和供应情况

目前,我们测试的微星Claw配置为512GB固态硬盘,可在亚马逊以649美元的优惠价格购买。

MSI Claw - 06/19/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Mechanical Inputs
67%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
58 / 68 → 85%
Weight
80 / 69-83 → 81%
Battery
78%
Display
69%
Games Performance
48 / 75 → 64%
Application Performance
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperature
87%
Noise
73%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Average
70%
77%
Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微星Claw评测--搭载英特尔酷睿Ultra处理器的游戏掌上电脑令人失望
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-06-18 (Update: 2024-06-18)