据说硅谷的发源地是帕洛阿尔托的一个小车库。1939 年,威廉-休利特(William Hewlett)和大卫-帕卡德(David Packard)就是在那里制造出了他们的第一批产品。如今,惠普与那个小车库已没有多少共同之处。这家制造商生产的电子设备,从笔记本电脑、计算机到打印机,畅销全球。
就连惠普 Envy 系列本身也已经积累了一定的历史。自 2009 年以来,它就一直存在--我们甚至发表过一篇关于惠普 Envy 15 的评论。 惠普 Envy 15的评测。无论过去还是现在,Envy 笔记本电脑都是作为高端设备销售的(毕竟名字就代表了一切),今天的测试机也不例外。至少,从光滑的铝合金和玻璃机身上看,这就是你所期望的。惠普正在向创意人士和自由职业者推销这款设备。但是,在我们的评测中你会发现,惠普 Envy 17-da0076ng 并非一切都是优质的。
尽管如此,这款采用 Nvidia 显卡的笔记本电脑仍不失为一款极具吸引力的替代产品。 LG Gram Pro和 三星Galaxy Book4或 联想 Yoga Pro 9的市场价格往往要便宜得多,这取决于其功能。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | HP Envy 17-da0076ng Ultra 7 155U, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 20.5 mm | 17.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.2 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 14.4 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
91.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
90.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
82 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng i7-1255U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 2.6 kg | 19.6 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统。第 8 版的结果与第 7 版没有可比性。请点击 这里.
案例
惠普 Envy 17 的外壳采用了大量的铝和玻璃材料,使其显得高贵典雅,质量上乘。但这些材料也影响了笔记本电脑的重量,这也解释了为什么制造商决定使用更轻质的塑料作为底座的外壳。不过,惠普 Envy 17 的重量还是超过了 2 千克。幸运的是,做工、触感和稳定性都非常出色。几乎没有任何东西可以扭曲、弯曲或按压。触摸屏的铰链运行平稳,仍能保持屏幕的位置。
在我们的数据库中,配备 17 英寸显示屏的多媒体笔记本电脑并不多见。但你仍然可以看到,Envy 17 比竞争对手要重很多。LG Gram 显然是羽量级的,但 Envy 2.5 公斤的重量更像是游戏笔记本电脑。
连接性
除读卡器外,Envy 17 还具备现代笔记本电脑的所有功能。USB-C 与 Thunderbolt、USB 3.1 和 USB-C 充电,这也意味着右侧的两个端口通常会被占用一个。
交流
Envy 17 配备了英特尔 AX211NGW 模块,支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙。与 6 GHz 网络的 Wi-Fi 连接速度非常快,我们没有遇到任何问题。Wi-Fi 模块可以很容易地更换为 Wi-Fi 7 模块(其他一些配置已经配备了)。
网络摄像头
Envy 的网络摄像头像素为 2,816 x 1,584,色彩鲜艳,图像清晰。不使用时,可通过隐私快门将其关闭。
维护
HP Envy 17 具有良好的维护功能。底座的盖子只用几颗螺丝和夹子固定,使用适当的工具和螺丝刀就能轻松取下。进入机箱后,您可以看到一个 M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘、Wi-Fi 模块和一个插槽式内存模块。它由 SO-DIMM 模块组成。HP PartSurfer允许我们识别测试装置中的许多部件,不过在欧洲订购替换部件可能会很麻烦,因为唯一授权的惠普部件经销商在美国和加拿大。
可持续性
根据惠普数据表,惠普 Envy 17-da 的碳足迹为 370 千克二氧化碳当量。.其中 81% 的碳足迹来自生产过程。我们无法找到任何关于笔记本电脑使用回收材料的信息。
至少包装基本上不使用塑料。只有电源装置用保护膜包裹。根据回收标签,即使是我们测试设备所使用的黑色包装袋也是由纤维素制成的,可以与废纸一起处理。
保修
根据数据表、标签和外壳上的印记,我们的测试设备保修两年(不含)。这与地区无关。
输入设备
键盘
惠普 Envy 17 的键盘非常出色,在触感和行程(大于 1.4 毫米)方面都无可挑剔。只是惠普笔记本电脑键盘的布局需要适应一下。制造商使用 ANSI 键盘布局,这意味着,至少在德文版中,你需要使用与 Fn 键的组合键来输入| 、> 或 <。这对日常用户来说听起来并不重要,但对编码人员或家庭办公用户来说可能会造成问题。
键盘具有多级背光和大字体,在黑暗中也清晰可读。细心的用户会注意到 Windows Co-Pilot 键,它现在取代了右侧的 Ctrl 键。在我们的测试中,该功能仍未始终可用。
触摸板
与周围的铝金属相比,触摸板总是给人一种舒适凉爽的感觉,而且具有良好的滑动性能。手感完美无瑕,输入设备的精度也很高。
触摸屏
在翻盖式笔记本电脑上安装触摸屏并不总是很实用。不过,面板上的触摸感应表面仍然运行良好,能快速识别和响应输入。疏油涂层可确保每次触摸都不会自动变成难看的涂抹。
显示屏
屏幕是 Envy 17 用户可能会羡慕竞争对手的第一个方面。目前,Envy 17 只配备了一块全高清显示屏,亮度和色彩都不是很高。它覆盖了约 97% 的 sRGB 色彩空间,亮度为 300 尼特,听起来更像是一款中端设备。60Hz 的刷新率也只是一般水平。凭借 4K 分辨率 前代产品在屏幕质量方面要好得多。幸运的是,惠普 Envy 17 在美国也配备了 4K 面板。
黑色值、对比度和亮度分布都很好;背光出血几乎看不见。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 318 cd/m²
Contrast: 781:1 (Black: 0.407 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.155
HP Envy 17-da0076ng BOE0C70, IPS, 1920x1080, 17", 60 Hz | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 LP156WFH-SPD5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng BOE0A66, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 27% | 22% | 24% | -43% | 23% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.6 | 99.8 45% | 95.6 39% | 98.6 44% | 38.11 -44% | 98.31 43% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.9 | 100 3% | 99.9 3% | 99.9 3% | 57.7 -40% | 100 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.4 | 94.6 34% | 86.5 23% | 88.5 26% | 39.41 -44% | 87.03 24% |
Response Times | 55% | 57% | 98% | -18% | 81% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 6 ? 80% | 12.4 ? 59% | 0.54 ? 98% | 33.6 ? -12% | 1 97% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20 ? | 14 ? 30% | 8.9 ? 55% | 0.69 ? 97% | 24.8 ? -24% | 7 ? 65% |
PWM Frequency | 481 | 240 ? | ||||
Screen | 995% | 25% | 40% | -77% | 26% | |
Brightness middle | 318 | 420 32% | 404.9 27% | 390 23% | 257.4 -19% | 390 23% |
Brightness | 290 | 421 45% | 390 34% | 393 36% | 248 -14% | 385 33% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 99 16% | 91 7% | 98 15% | 88 4% | 86 1% |
Black Level * | 0.407 | 0.006 99% | 0.4 2% | 0.3209 21% | 0.395 3% | |
Contrast | 781 | 70000 8863% | 1012 30% | 802 3% | 987 26% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3 | 1.66 45% | 2.42 19% | 1.4 53% | 6.26 -109% | 1.66 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 4.92 18% | 4.65 22% | 2.7 55% | 18.28 -205% | 2.9 52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 3.39 -239% | 0.93 7% | 4.99 -399% | 1.16 -16% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 1.3 73% | 1.1 78% | 2.1 57% | 3.7 24% | 1.83 63% |
Gamma | 2.155 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.186 101% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 6569 99% | 6609 98% | 6468 100% | 6431 101% | 6606 98% | 6727 97% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 359% /
653% | 35% /
29% | 54% /
46% | -46% /
-61% | 43% /
33% |
* ... smaller is better
惠普 Envy 17-da 的面板甚至没有覆盖整个 sRGB 色彩空间。不出所料,它只能管理更大的 AdobeRGB 和 DisplayP3 色彩空间的约 70%。
惠普 Envy 未达到 ΔΕ2000 3 ex works 的目标值,但幸运的是,使用我们的色彩配置文件(可在上面下载)校准面板非常容易。平均色彩偏差为 ΔΕ2000 1.58,适合专业用途。我们很惊讶地注意到,在工作时会出现明显的绿松石偏色。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.5 ms rise | |
↘ 8.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.5 ms rise | |
↘ 16.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
约 300 cd/m² 的亮度对于带有反光表面的屏幕来说并不高。即使在摄影棚的灯光下,我们也能看到反光会严重影响可读性。在室外使用时,即使是在傍晚的阳光下,我们也会发现玻璃表面和低亮度的结合并不一定有益。
惠普 Envy 17 尤其让我们印象深刻的是,从更宽的视角观看屏幕时亮度降低了。这并不一定是件坏事,因为它可以减少在公共场合不必要的偷窥。我们没有发现任何色彩偏差。
性能
惠普 Envy 17 有多种配置可供选择。我们的测试机配备了 英特尔酷睿 7 155U32 GB DDR-5 内存、2 TB NVMe-SSD 和 4 GB 英伟达GeForce RTX 3050.U 系列英特尔处理器现在配备了四核心的英特尔 iGPU。但是,由于 Nvidia 图形处理器可以完成繁重的工作,因此体积更小、能效更高的 iGPU 才是正确的选择。其他配置也有不带专用 GPU 的机型,如 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H或 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125H.在这种情况下,Arc iGPU 也能承担要求更高的图形任务。根据处理器的不同,Envy 可配备 16 或 32 GB 内存以及 512 GB 至 2 TB 的存储空间。
测试条件
通过 myHP 应用程序,您可以访问性能管理设置。每次启动后,程序都会查找其他惠普设备,这通常会耗费大量时间。性能管理有五种模式可供选择,其中 "节能 "模式仅在使用电池时可用。
在我们的测试中,"智能感知"、"平衡 "和 "性能 "都能提供非常接近的性能水平,而且似乎对噪音影响很小。性能模式可将 GPU 性能提升至约 40 瓦,而智能感知和平衡模式的目标是 35 瓦。在所有三种情况下,CPU 的提升性能都在 50 瓦左右。持续性能在 20 到 15 瓦之间波动,具体取决于设备的温度。我们没有注意到 GPU 和 CPU 之间的功率变化。
在测试过程中,我们注意到一件事:只要 Nvidia GPU 开始工作,笔记本电脑就会启动冷却系统。这也提高了处理器的性能。如果 dGPU 处于激活状态,处理器的功耗往往会增加 10 瓦。
笔记本电脑的标准配置为智能感应模式,因此我们使用该模式进行测试。
处理器
不要指望与前代产品相比会有什么重大变化,因为英特尔成熟的 CPU 架构近年来变化不大。从 Intel Core i7-1255U 到 Core Ultra 7 155U,P 内核和 E 内核的数量保持不变。只有 UE 内核是新的。它们的处理能力不强,但非常节能。我们很高兴测试设备的性能在很长一段时间内保持不变,但也注意到处理器的电力供应非常少,这意味着性能最终会降低。工作内存的速度也相对较慢,而惠普 Envy 17 的大多数竞争对手在这些基准测试中的速度都更快。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 -2! | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng -2! | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7884 - 9964, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1265 - 1675, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3075 - 3819, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (485 - 646, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1378 - 1633, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (230 - 246, n=3) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (345 - 410, n=3) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (33897 - 38645, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3666 - 4920, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 22544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7592 - 9448, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1534 - 2324, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (6989 - 8409, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (891 - 1691, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (8.41 - 11.1, n=3) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (44.3 - 146.7, n=3) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (0.506 - 0.947, n=3) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7048 - 8811, n=3) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (34928 - 44269, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1827 - 2466, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (44936 - 46759, n=3) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (4251 - 5540, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (17116 - 21672, n=3) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (38152 - 47675, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (546 - 723, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3521 - 4521, n=3) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (25065 - 44831, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
系统性能
我们的 HP Envy 17 在测试过程中始终运行平稳。同样,内存速度慢和酷睿Ultra 7的瓦数限制也对系统性能基准造成了很大影响。总的来说,尽管我们的测试机配备了最新的硬件,但其性能还是跟不上时代的步伐。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 4542 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (36706 - 77717, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (37978 - 62523, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (38436 - 62982, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (130.8 - 253, n=3) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在测试过程中,我们没有注意到任何重大的延迟问题,但 LatencyMon 的结果仍显示出一些问题,可能会给音频处理等现场应用带来麻烦。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
事实再次证明,SK Hynix 是 Envy 17 上一款出色的固态硬盘。在大多数情况下,它都能提供较高的读写速率,并具有必要的耐力。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形
只要 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050启动时,笔记本电脑的散热也会随之启动。几乎在所有散热模式下,GPU 的工作功率都是 35 瓦,这证明 RTX 3050 与我们测试设备的前代产品相比有了显著提升。不过,3050 并不是 Nvidia 最新推出的芯片,而且 联想 Yoga Pro 9和 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro在图形性能的直接比较中表现得更好。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 -1! | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra -1! | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP -1! | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng -1! | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 -1! | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G -2! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12523 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8972 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3905 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 50 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3812 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
尽管惠普 Envy 17 拥有游戏笔记本电脑应有的重量和尺寸,但它仍然是一款图形性能中等的多媒体笔记本电脑。3050 的光线追踪性能相当差,这也意味着在游戏中使用光线追踪而不进行升频的可能性很小。只要关闭光线追踪功能,当前的游戏应该可以在 60 Hz 的全高清条件下以不错的 FPS 和最高的画质设置进行游戏。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
Cinebench 循环已经表明,我们测试单元的性能在长时间内保持不变。我们的赛博朋克基准场景也证实了这一点,只显示了 NPC 反复交互时产生的典型波动。
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 128.7 | 89.9 | 48.3 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 111.4 | 99.7 | 97 | 90 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 88.5 | 55.8 | 39.5 | 28.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 76.2 | 63.5 | 51.6 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 195.9 | 85.3 | 69.6 | 60.4 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 73.8 | 63.7 | 48.9 | 12.6 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 37.1 | 35.7 | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 47.6 | 21.1 | |||
F1 24 (2024) | 91 | 38 |
排放量
噪音排放
在使用惠普 Envy 17 玩游戏时,我们测得的最大音量为 43.7 dB(A)。在这种情况下,散热风扇会在中频范围内产生更多的嗡嗡声,尽管音量很大,但并不会造成特别大的干扰。当 Nvidia GPU 关闭时,尽管处理器满负荷运行,风扇的噪音也会迅速降至 36 dB(A)。风扇在空转时通常保持静音或几乎听不到噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.4 / 25.4 / 26.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.5 / 43.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.4 dB(A) |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155U, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1355U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1255U, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | -7% | 2% | -3% | -12% | 3% | |
off / environment * | 25.4 | 25.2 1% | 23.6 7% | 24.2 5% | 25.04 1% | 26.5 -4% | 24.95 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.4 | 25.2 1% | 23.6 7% | 24.2 5% | 26.3 -4% | 28.5 -12% | 24.95 2% |
Idle Average * | 25.4 | 26.3 -4% | 25.4 -0% | 24.2 5% | 26.3 -4% | 28.5 -12% | 24.95 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.2 | 26.7 -2% | 25.4 3% | 24.2 8% | 26.3 -0% | 29.7 -13% | 25.3 3% |
Load Average * | 32.5 | 31.8 2% | 44.2 -36% | 37.9 -17% | 32.5 -0% | 39.5 -22% | 38.54 -19% |
Load Maximum * | 43.2 | 45.1 -4% | 52.6 -22% | 41.7 3% | 49 -13% | 48 -11% | 32 26% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 52 | ||||||
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.9 | 41.7 | 46.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
惠普 Envy 17 在空转或低负载时不会特别发热。在我们的压力测试中,装在铝制外壳中的设备确实在某些区域明显发热。虽然腕托和触摸板保持凉爽,但键盘中央区域的温度却相当高。幸运的是,尽管表面温度高达 40 °C,但塑料并没有让人感觉不舒服。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23 °C / 73.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+5.8 °C / 10.4 F).
HP Envy 17-da0076ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng Intel Core i7-1255U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -14% | 1% | 15% | 11% | 5% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 49 -17% | 41 2% | 38.5 8% | 35.7 15% | 47.1 -12% | 40.1 5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55.4 | 48.5 12% | 40.6 27% | 41.2 26% | 36.8 34% | 43.8 21% | 42.9 23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.2 | 33.5 -38% | 30.2 -25% | 23.5 3% | 27.9 -15% | 25.2 -4% | 26.8 -11% |
Idle Bottom * | 31 | 35 -13% | 31.4 -1% | 24.1 22% | 27.9 10% | 25.9 16% | 31.1 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在 Prime95 和 FurMark 的整个压力测试过程中,CPU 的功耗保持不变,但我们注意到 GPU 有明显的波动。在我们的测试中,处理器和 GPU 芯片的温度都明显升高。
发言人
我们测试设备中的立体声扬声器音质很好。均衡的中音和高音与轻柔的低音相得益彰。
HP Envy 17-da0076ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
惠普配备了最大输出功率为 100 瓦的 USB-C 电源。在所有测量中,电源几乎从不需要这么大的功率。最多只是在启动时短暂需要 100 瓦的功率。闲置时,笔记本电脑的能效相当高,耗电量在 6 到 7 瓦之间。在游戏和压力测试时,Envy 17 的功耗在 60 到 80 瓦之间。这些结果对于硬件来说是合适的。
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.4 Watt |
Idle | 4.35 / 4.95 / 12.5 Watt |
Load |
/ 103.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng Ultra 7 155U, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, IPS, 1920x1080, 17" | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 3200x2000, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng i7-1255U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -60% | -144% | -12% | 5% | -65% | 16% | -54% | -51% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.35 | 10.15 -133% | 9.9 -128% | 4.8 -10% | 4.31 1% | 5.8 -33% | 3.4 22% | 7.17 ? -65% | 6.78 ? -56% |
Idle Average * | 4.95 | 11.65 -135% | 16.6 -235% | 7.5 -52% | 6.52 -32% | 14.3 -189% | 6.1 -23% | 10.4 ? -110% | 11.3 ? -128% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.5 | 14.33 -15% | 29.2 -134% | 7.9 37% | 8.037 36% | 18.4 -47% | 9.9 21% | 14.8 ? -18% | 13.4 ? -7% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 66.1 | 85.3 -29% | |||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 79.3 | ||||||||
Load Maximum * | 103.2 | 91.7 11% | 182.2 -77% | 125 -21% | 89.5 13% | 93 10% | 60 42% | 124.8 ? -21% | 117.3 ? -14% |
Load Average * | 67.5 | 100.9 | 79.3 | 75.2 | 70 | 31.29 | 89.7 ? | 71.1 ? | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 151.8 | 79.2 | 60.8 | 69.4 | 40.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Energy Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Energy Consumption w/ External Monitor
电池寿命
惠普规定 Envy 17 的电池续航时间为 9 小时 15 分钟。但我们的测试机在某些测试中却能坚持更长时间。在我们进行的网上冲浪测试中,它能提供 12 小时的冲浪时间,这也让 Envy 17 超越了它的竞争对手--LG Gram 17 除外。 LG Gram 17没有 dGPU 的 LG Gram 17 更为经济实惠。
这表明,与去年相比,测试设备的电池寿命有了大幅提升。电池寿命的提高不仅是因为电池容量增大了,还因为采用了能效更高的新芯片,以及屏幕分辨率降低了。
HP Envy 17-da0076ng Ultra 7 155U, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 48 Wh | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng i7-1255U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 55 Wh | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -7% | -26% | -11% | -29% | -62% | 25% | 16% | |
Reader / Idle | 718 | 1168 ? 63% | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 734 | 686 -7% | 540 -26% | 656 -11% | 522 -29% | 279 -62% | 918 25% | 625 ? -15% |
Gaming | 92 | 92 ? 0% | ||||||
H.264 | 1076 | 397 | 332 | 821 ? | ||||
Load | 78 | 118 | 95 | 140 | 97.8 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决
惠普 Envy 17 的技术规格表看起来很有希望。除了 Nvidia 显卡外,它还配备了现代处理器、强劲的电池和多种硬件适配方式。吸引人的设计和出色的做工是这个价位笔记本电脑的标准配置,Envy 符合这些要求。虽然在我们的基准测试中,这款笔记本电脑的性能并不出众,但在日常使用中应该不会有什么问题。这款多媒体笔记本电脑绝对能让你流畅地工作,偶尔还能玩玩游戏。另一方面,惠普 Envy 17 的竞争对手也很多。我们的数据库显示,全高清分辨率相当罕见,大多数竞争对手都采用了更高的分辨率和 16:10 比例。在同类产品中,惠普 Envy 17 的重量也很重,不过这在很大程度上也与它的尺寸有关。除了 LG Gram 17 之外,只有极少数 17 英寸设备称得上是多媒体笔记本电脑。
惠普 Envy 117 是一款不错的笔记本电脑,尽管看起来有点与时代脱节。现代的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器与不再前沿的 RTX 3050 和只能提供 sRGB 色彩的全高清屏幕相得益彰。
去年Envy 17 的亮点在于它的屏幕。但是,至少在德国,制造商选择放弃这一出色的图像质量,这使得新款惠普 Envy 17 的突出之处不是它的品质,而是它的令人失望之处。惠普 LG Gram 17和 LG Gram Pro以及 联想 Yoga Pro 9或 三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra在价格相同的情况下,它们的图像质量都要好得多。它们在许多方面的性能似乎也超过了惠普 Envy 17。由于采用了更大的电池和更高效的硬件,Envy 17 的电池续航时间得到了真正的改善。在可持续性方面,该设备也比竞争对手略胜一筹:它的许多部件都易于更换,包装主要采用纸板和纸张,惠普还公开发布了碳排放信息。
提示:我们已对评级系统进行了更新,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果没有可比性。更多信息请参见 这里查看。
HP Envy 17-da0076ng
- 09/17/2024 v8
Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.