据说硅谷的发源地是帕洛阿尔托的一个小车库。1939 年,威廉-休利特(William Hewlett)和大卫-帕卡德(David Packard)就是在那里制造出了他们的第一批产品。如今,惠普与那个小车库已没有多少共同之处。这家制造商生产的电子设备,从笔记本电脑、计算机到打印机,畅销全球。
就连惠普 Envy 系列本身也已经积累了一定的历史。自 2009 年以来,它就一直存在--我们甚至发表过一篇关于惠普 Envy 15 的评论。 惠普 Envy 15的评测。无论过去还是现在,Envy 笔记本电脑都是作为高端设备销售的(毕竟名字就代表了一切),今天的测试机也不例外。至少,从光滑的铝合金和玻璃机身上看,这就是你所期望的。惠普正在向创意人士和自由职业者推销这款设备。但是,在我们的评测中你会发现,惠普 Envy 17-da0076ng 并非一切都是优质的。
尽管如此,这款采用 Nvidia 显卡的笔记本电脑仍不失为一款极具吸引力的替代产品。 LG Gram Pro和 三星Galaxy Book4或 联想 Yoga Pro 9的市场价格往往要便宜得多,这取决于其功能。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80 % | v8 | 09/2024 | HP Envy 17-da0076ng Ultra 7 155U, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 20.5 mm | 17.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.2 % | v8 | 07/2024 | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 14.4 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
91.7 % | v7 (old) | 06/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
90.4 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
82 % | v7 (old) | 09/2023 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % | v7 (old) | 04/2023 | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng i7-1255U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 2.6 kg | 19.6 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统。第 8 版的结果与第 7 版没有可比性。请点击 这里.
案例
惠普 Envy 17 的外壳采用了大量的铝和玻璃材料,使其显得高贵典雅,质量上乘。但这些材料也影响了笔记本电脑的重量,这也解释了为什么制造商决定使用更轻质的塑料作为底座的外壳。不过,惠普 Envy 17 的重量还是超过了 2 千克。幸运的是,做工、触感和稳定性都非常出色。几乎没有任何东西可以扭曲、弯曲或按压。触摸屏的铰链运行平稳,仍能保持屏幕的位置。
在我们的数据库中,配备 17 英寸显示屏的多媒体笔记本电脑并不多见。但你仍然可以看到,Envy 17 比竞争对手要重很多。LG Gram 显然是羽量级的,但 Envy 2.5 公斤的重量更像是游戏笔记本电脑。
连接性
除读卡器外,Envy 17 还具备现代笔记本电脑的所有功能。USB-C 与 Thunderbolt、USB 3.1 和 USB-C 充电,这也意味着右侧的两个端口通常会被占用一个。
交流
Envy 17 配备了英特尔 AX211NGW 模块,支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙。与 6 GHz 网络的 Wi-Fi 连接速度非常快,我们没有遇到任何问题。Wi-Fi 模块可以很容易地更换为 Wi-Fi 7 模块(其他一些配置已经配备了)。
网络摄像头
Envy 的网络摄像头像素为 2,816 x 1,584,色彩鲜艳,图像清晰。不使用时,可通过隐私快门将其关闭。
维护
HP Envy 17 具有良好的维护功能。底座的盖子只用几颗螺丝和夹子固定,使用适当的工具和螺丝刀就能轻松取下。进入机箱后,您可以看到一个 M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘、Wi-Fi 模块和一个插槽式内存模块。它由 SO-DIMM 模块组成。HP PartSurfer允许我们识别测试装置中的许多部件,不过在欧洲订购替换部件可能会很麻烦,因为唯一授权的惠普部件经销商在美国和加拿大。
可持续性
根据惠普数据表,惠普 Envy 17-da 的碳足迹为 370 千克二氧化碳当量。.其中 81% 的碳足迹来自生产过程。我们无法找到任何关于笔记本电脑使用回收材料的信息。
至少包装基本上不使用塑料。只有电源装置用保护膜包裹。根据回收标签,即使是我们测试设备所使用的黑色包装袋也是由纤维素制成的,可以与废纸一起处理。
保修
根据数据表、标签和外壳上的印记,我们的测试设备保修两年(不含)。这与地区无关。
输入设备
键盘
惠普 Envy 17 的键盘非常出色,在触感和行程(大于 1.4 毫米)方面都无可挑剔。只是惠普笔记本电脑键盘的布局需要适应一下。制造商使用 ANSI 键盘布局,这意味着,至少在德文版中,你需要使用与 Fn 键的组合键来输入| 、> 或 <。这对日常用户来说听起来并不重要,但对编码人员或家庭办公用户来说可能会造成问题。
键盘具有多级背光和大字体,在黑暗中也清晰可读。细心的用户会注意到 Windows Co-Pilot 键,它现在取代了右侧的 Ctrl 键。在我们的测试中,该功能仍未始终可用。
触摸板
与周围的铝金属相比,触摸板总是给人一种舒适凉爽的感觉,而且具有良好的滑动性能。手感完美无瑕,输入设备的精度也很高。
触摸屏
在翻盖式笔记本电脑上安装触摸屏并不总是很实用。不过,面板上的触摸感应表面仍然运行良好,能快速识别和响应输入。疏油涂层可确保每次触摸都不会自动变成难看的涂抹。
显示屏
屏幕是 Envy 17 用户可能会羡慕竞争对手的第一个方面。目前,Envy 17 只配备了一块全高清显示屏,亮度和色彩都不是很高。它覆盖了约 97% 的 sRGB 色彩空间,亮度为 300 尼特,听起来更像是一款中端设备。60Hz 的刷新率也只是一般水平。凭借 4K 分辨率 前代产品在屏幕质量方面要好得多。幸运的是,惠普 Envy 17 在美国也配备了 4K 面板。
黑色值、对比度和亮度分布都很好;背光出血几乎看不见。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 318 cd/m²
Contrast: 781:1 (Black: 0.407 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.155
HP Envy 17-da0076ng BOE0C70, IPS, 1920x1080, 17", 60 Hz | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 LP156WFH-SPD5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng BOE0A66, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 27% | 22% | 24% | -43% | 23% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.6 | 99.8 45% | 95.6 39% | 98.6 44% | 38.11 -44% | 98.31 43% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.9 | 100 3% | 99.9 3% | 99.9 3% | 57.7 -40% | 100 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.4 | 94.6 34% | 86.5 23% | 88.5 26% | 39.41 -44% | 87.03 24% |
Response Times | 55% | 57% | 98% | -18% | 81% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 6 ? 80% | 12.4 ? 59% | 0.54 ? 98% | 33.6 ? -12% | 1 97% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20 ? | 14 ? 30% | 8.9 ? 55% | 0.69 ? 97% | 24.8 ? -24% | 7 ? 65% |
PWM Frequency | 481 | 240 ? | ||||
Screen | 995% | 25% | 40% | -77% | 26% | |
Brightness middle | 318 | 420 32% | 404.9 27% | 390 23% | 257.4 -19% | 390 23% |
Brightness | 290 | 421 45% | 390 34% | 393 36% | 248 -14% | 385 33% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 99 16% | 91 7% | 98 15% | 88 4% | 86 1% |
Black Level * | 0.407 | 0.006 99% | 0.4 2% | 0.3209 21% | 0.395 3% | |
Contrast | 781 | 70000 8863% | 1012 30% | 802 3% | 987 26% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3 | 1.66 45% | 2.42 19% | 1.4 53% | 6.26 -109% | 1.66 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 4.92 18% | 4.65 22% | 2.7 55% | 18.28 -205% | 2.9 52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 3.39 -239% | 0.93 7% | 4.99 -399% | 1.16 -16% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 1.3 73% | 1.1 78% | 2.1 57% | 3.7 24% | 1.83 63% |
Gamma | 2.155 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.186 101% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 6569 99% | 6609 98% | 6468 100% | 6431 101% | 6606 98% | 6727 97% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 359% /
653% | 35% /
29% | 54% /
46% | -46% /
-61% | 43% /
33% |
* ... smaller is better
惠普 Envy 17-da 的面板甚至没有覆盖整个 sRGB 色彩空间。不出所料,它只能管理更大的 AdobeRGB 和 DisplayP3 色彩空间的约 70%。
惠普 Envy 未达到 ΔΕ2000 3 ex works 的目标值,但幸运的是,使用我们的色彩配置文件(可在上面下载)校准面板非常容易。平均色彩偏差为 ΔΕ2000 1.58,适合专业用途。我们很惊讶地注意到,在工作时会出现明显的绿松石偏色。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.5 ms rise | |
↘ 8.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.5 ms rise | |
↘ 16.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17254 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
约 300 cd/m² 的亮度对于带有反光表面的屏幕来说并不高。即使在摄影棚的灯光下,我们也能看到反光会严重影响可读性。在室外使用时,即使是在傍晚的阳光下,我们也会发现玻璃表面和低亮度的结合并不一定有益。
惠普 Envy 17 尤其让我们印象深刻的是,从更宽的视角观看屏幕时亮度降低了。这并不一定是件坏事,因为它可以减少在公共场合不必要的偷窥。我们没有发现任何色彩偏差。
性能
惠普 Envy 17 有多种配置可供选择。我们的测试机配备了 英特尔酷睿 7 155U32 GB DDR-5 内存、2 TB NVMe-SSD 和 4 GB 英伟达GeForce RTX 3050.U 系列英特尔处理器现在配备了四核心的英特尔 iGPU。但是,由于 Nvidia 图形处理器可以完成繁重的工作,因此体积更小、能效更高的 iGPU 才是正确的选择。其他配置也有不带专用 GPU 的机型,如 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H或 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125H.在这种情况下,Arc iGPU 也能承担要求更高的图形任务。根据处理器的不同,Envy 可配备 16 或 32 GB 内存以及 512 GB 至 2 TB 的存储空间。
测试条件
通过 myHP 应用程序,您可以访问性能管理设置。每次启动后,程序都会查找其他惠普设备,这通常会耗费大量时间。性能管理有五种模式可供选择,其中 "节能 "模式仅在使用电池时可用。
在我们的测试中,"智能感知"、"平衡 "和 "性能 "都能提供非常接近的性能水平,而且似乎对噪音影响很小。性能模式可将 GPU 性能提升至约 40 瓦,而智能感知和平衡模式的目标是 35 瓦。在所有三种情况下,CPU 的提升性能都在 50 瓦左右。持续性能在 20 到 15 瓦之间波动,具体取决于设备的温度。我们没有注意到 GPU 和 CPU 之间的功率变化。
在测试过程中,我们注意到一件事:只要 Nvidia GPU 开始工作,笔记本电脑就会启动冷却系统。这也提高了处理器的性能。如果 dGPU 处于激活状态,处理器的功耗往往会增加 10 瓦。
笔记本电脑的标准配置为智能感应模式,因此我们使用该模式进行测试。
处理器
不要指望与前代产品相比会有什么重大变化,因为英特尔成熟的 CPU 架构近年来变化不大。从 Intel Core i7-1255U 到 Core Ultra 7 155U,P 内核和 E 内核的数量保持不变。只有 UE 内核是新的。它们的处理能力不强,但非常节能。我们很高兴测试设备的性能在很长一段时间内保持不变,但也注意到处理器的电力供应非常少,这意味着性能最终会降低。工作内存的速度也相对较慢,而惠普 Envy 17 的大多数竞争对手在这些基准测试中的速度都更快。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 -2! | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng -2! | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=99, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7884 - 9964, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2245, n=90, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1265 - 1675, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3075 - 3819, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (485 - 646, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=91, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1378 - 1633, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=88, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (230 - 246, n=3) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (345 - 410, n=3) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=80, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (33897 - 38645, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3666 - 4920, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 21264, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7592 - 9448, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3157, n=52, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1534 - 2324, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (6989 - 8409, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (891 - 1691, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=79, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (8.41 - 11.1, n=3) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (44.3 - 146.7, n=3) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (0.506 - 0.947, n=3) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7048 - 8811, n=3) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (34928 - 44269, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1827 - 2466, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (44936 - 46759, n=3) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=78, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (4251 - 5540, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (17116 - 21672, n=3) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (38152 - 47675, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (546 - 723, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3521 - 4521, n=3) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (25065 - 44831, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
系统性能
我们的 HP Envy 17 在测试过程中始终运行平稳。同样,内存速度慢和酷睿Ultra 7的瓦数限制也对系统性能基准造成了很大影响。总的来说,尽管我们的测试机配备了最新的硬件,但其性能还是跟不上时代的步伐。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=86, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=86, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2564, n=86, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=86, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 476, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 348, n=76, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Multimedia (363 - 1016, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 4542 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 94300, n=78, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (36706 - 77717, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (37978 - 62523, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 100507, n=78, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (38436 - 62982, n=3) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (130.8 - 253, n=3) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=78, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在测试过程中,我们没有注意到任何重大的延迟问题,但 LatencyMon 的结果仍显示出一些问题,可能会给音频处理等现场应用带来麻烦。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
事实再次证明,SK Hynix 是 Envy 17 上一款出色的固态硬盘。在大多数情况下,它都能提供较高的读写速率,并具有必要的耐力。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形
只要 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050启动时,笔记本电脑的散热也会随之启动。几乎在所有散热模式下,GPU 的工作功率都是 35 瓦,这证明 RTX 3050 与我们测试设备的前代产品相比有了显著提升。不过,3050 并不是 Nvidia 最新推出的芯片,而且 联想 Yoga Pro 9和 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro在图形性能的直接比较中表现得更好。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 -1! | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra -1! | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP -1! | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng -1! | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 -1! | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G -2! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12523 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8972 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3905 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 50 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3812 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
尽管惠普 Envy 17 拥有游戏笔记本电脑应有的重量和尺寸,但它仍然是一款图形性能中等的多媒体笔记本电脑。3050 的光线追踪性能相当差,这也意味着在游戏中使用光线追踪而不进行升频的可能性很小。只要关闭光线追踪功能,当前的游戏应该可以在 60 Hz 的全高清条件下以不错的 FPS 和最高的画质设置进行游戏。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=79, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
Cinebench 循环已经表明,我们测试单元的性能在长时间内保持不变。我们的赛博朋克基准场景也证实了这一点,只显示了 NPC 反复交互时产生的典型波动。
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
GTA V (2015) | 128.7 | 89.9 | 48.3 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 111.4 | 99.7 | 97 | 90 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 88.5 | 55.8 | 39.5 | 28.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 76.2 | 63.5 | 51.6 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 195.9 | 85.3 | 69.6 | 60.4 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 73.8 | 63.7 | 48.9 | 12.6 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 37.1 | 35.7 | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 47.6 | 21.1 | |||
F1 24 (2024) | 91 | 38 |
排放量
噪音排放
在使用惠普 Envy 17 玩游戏时,我们测得的最大音量为 43.7 dB(A)。在这种情况下,散热风扇会在中频范围内产生更多的嗡嗡声,尽管音量很大,但并不会造成特别大的干扰。当 Nvidia GPU 关闭时,尽管处理器满负荷运行,风扇的噪音也会迅速降至 36 dB(A)。风扇在空转时通常保持静音或几乎听不到噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.4 / 25.4 / 26.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.5 / 43.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.4 dB(A) |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155U, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1355U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1255U, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | -7% | 2% | -3% | -12% | 3% | |
off / environment * | 25.4 | 25.2 1% | 23.6 7% | 24.2 5% | 25.04 1% | 26.5 -4% | 24.95 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.4 | 25.2 1% | 23.6 7% | 24.2 5% | 26.3 -4% | 28.5 -12% | 24.95 2% |
Idle Average * | 25.4 | 26.3 -4% | 25.4 -0% | 24.2 5% | 26.3 -4% | 28.5 -12% | 24.95 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.2 | 26.7 -2% | 25.4 3% | 24.2 8% | 26.3 -0% | 29.7 -13% | 25.3 3% |
Load Average * | 32.5 | 31.8 2% | 44.2 -36% | 37.9 -17% | 32.5 -0% | 39.5 -22% | 38.54 -19% |
Load Maximum * | 43.2 | 45.1 -4% | 52.6 -22% | 41.7 3% | 49 -13% | 48 -11% | 32 26% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 52 | ||||||
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.9 | 41.7 | 46.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
惠普 Envy 17 在空转或低负载时不会特别发热。在我们的压力测试中,装在铝制外壳中的设备确实在某些区域明显发热。虽然腕托和触摸板保持凉爽,但键盘中央区域的温度却相当高。幸运的是,尽管表面温度高达 40 °C,但塑料并没有让人感觉不舒服。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23 °C / 73.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+5.8 °C / 10.4 F).
HP Envy 17-da0076ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng Intel Core i7-1255U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -14% | 1% | 15% | 11% | 5% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 49 -17% | 41 2% | 38.5 8% | 35.7 15% | 47.1 -12% | 40.1 5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55.4 | 48.5 12% | 40.6 27% | 41.2 26% | 36.8 34% | 43.8 21% | 42.9 23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.2 | 33.5 -38% | 30.2 -25% | 23.5 3% | 27.9 -15% | 25.2 -4% | 26.8 -11% |
Idle Bottom * | 31 | 35 -13% | 31.4 -1% | 24.1 22% | 27.9 10% | 25.9 16% | 31.1 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在 Prime95 和 FurMark 的整个压力测试过程中,CPU 的功耗保持不变,但我们注意到 GPU 有明显的波动。在我们的测试中,处理器和 GPU 芯片的温度都明显升高。
发言人
我们测试设备中的立体声扬声器音质很好。均衡的中音和高音与轻柔的低音相得益彰。
HP Envy 17-da0076ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
惠普配备了最大输出功率为 100 瓦的 USB-C 电源。在所有测量中,电源几乎从不需要这么大的功率。最多只是在启动时短暂需要 100 瓦的功率。闲置时,笔记本电脑的能效相当高,耗电量在 6 到 7 瓦之间。在游戏和压力测试时,Envy 17 的功耗在 60 到 80 瓦之间。这些结果对于硬件来说是合适的。
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.4 Watt |
Idle | 4.35 / 4.95 / 12.5 Watt |
Load |
/ 103.2 Watt |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng Ultra 7 155U, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, IPS, 1920x1080, 17" | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 3200x2000, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng i7-1255U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -60% | -144% | -12% | 5% | -65% | 16% | -54% | -54% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.35 | 10.15 -133% | 9.9 -128% | 4.8 -10% | 4.31 1% | 5.8 -33% | 3.4 22% | 7.17 ? -65% | 7.01 ? -61% |
Idle Average * | 4.95 | 11.65 -135% | 16.6 -235% | 7.5 -52% | 6.52 -32% | 14.3 -189% | 6.1 -23% | 10.4 ? -110% | 11.3 ? -128% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.5 | 14.33 -15% | 29.2 -134% | 7.9 37% | 8.037 36% | 18.4 -47% | 9.9 21% | 14.8 ? -18% | 13.8 ? -10% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 66.1 | 85.3 -29% | |||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 79.3 | ||||||||
Load Maximum * | 103.2 | 91.7 11% | 182.2 -77% | 125 -21% | 89.5 13% | 93 10% | 60 42% | 124.8 ? -21% | 120.5 ? -17% |
Load Average * | 67.5 | 100.9 | 79.3 | 75.2 | 70 | 31.29 | 89.7 ? | 72.6 ? | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 151.8 | 79.2 | 60.8 | 69.4 | 40.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Energy Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Energy Consumption w/ External Monitor
电池寿命
惠普规定 Envy 17 的电池续航时间为 9 小时 15 分钟。但我们的测试机在某些测试中却能坚持更长时间。在我们进行的网上冲浪测试中,它能提供 12 小时的冲浪时间,这也让 Envy 17 超越了它的竞争对手--LG Gram 17 除外。 LG Gram 17没有 dGPU 的 LG Gram 17 更为经济实惠。
这表明,与去年相比,测试设备的电池寿命有了大幅提升。电池寿命的提高不仅是因为电池容量增大了,还因为采用了能效更高的新芯片,以及屏幕分辨率降低了。
HP Envy 17-da0076ng Ultra 7 155U, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 48 Wh | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng i7-1255U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 55 Wh | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -7% | -26% | -11% | -29% | -62% | 25% | 10% | |
Reader / Idle | 718 | 1052 ? 47% | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 734 | 686 -7% | 540 -26% | 656 -11% | 522 -29% | 279 -62% | 918 25% | 605 ? -18% |
Gaming | 92 | 92 ? 0% | ||||||
H.264 | 1076 | 397 | 332 | 788 ? | ||||
Load | 78 | 118 | 95 | 140 | 96.9 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决
惠普 Envy 17 的技术规格表看起来很有希望。除了 Nvidia 显卡外,它还配备了现代处理器、强劲的电池和多种硬件适配方式。吸引人的设计和出色的做工是这个价位笔记本电脑的标准配置,Envy 符合这些要求。虽然在我们的基准测试中,这款笔记本电脑的性能并不出众,但在日常使用中应该不会有什么问题。这款多媒体笔记本电脑绝对能让你流畅地工作,偶尔还能玩玩游戏。另一方面,惠普 Envy 17 的竞争对手也很多。我们的数据库显示,全高清分辨率相当罕见,大多数竞争对手都采用了更高的分辨率和 16:10 比例。在同类产品中,惠普 Envy 17 的重量也很重,不过这在很大程度上也与它的尺寸有关。除了 LG Gram 17 之外,只有极少数 17 英寸设备称得上是多媒体笔记本电脑。
惠普 Envy 117 是一款不错的笔记本电脑,尽管看起来有点与时代脱节。现代的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器与不再前沿的 RTX 3050 和只能提供 sRGB 色彩的全高清屏幕相得益彰。
去年Envy 17 的亮点在于它的屏幕。但是,至少在德国,制造商选择放弃这一出色的图像质量,这使得新款惠普 Envy 17 的突出之处不是它的品质,而是它的令人失望之处。惠普 LG Gram 17和 LG Gram Pro以及 联想 Yoga Pro 9或 三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra在价格相同的情况下,它们的图像质量都要好得多。它们在许多方面的性能似乎也超过了惠普 Envy 17。由于采用了更大的电池和更高效的硬件,Envy 17 的电池续航时间得到了真正的改善。在可持续性方面,该设备也比竞争对手略胜一筹:它的许多部件都易于更换,包装主要采用纸板和纸张,惠普还公开发布了碳排放信息。
提示:我们已对评级系统进行了更新,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果没有可比性。更多信息请参见 这里查看。
HP Envy 17-da0076ng
-
09/17/2024 v8
Marc Herter
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.