联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 笔记本电脑评测:75 WGeForce RTX 4050 性能超群
![联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050](fileadmin/_processed_/0/b/csm_PXL_20240606_1955052802_3_2231862732.jpg)
Yoga Pro 9 系列是联想多媒体笔记本电脑的旗舰阵容,高于中高档产品 Yoga 7 16 系列和低端 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 系列.最近,我们对最高端的 最高端的 Yoga Pro 9 配置配备迷你 LED 和GeForce RTX 4070 显卡。这次,我们要评测的是配备标准 IPS 和GeForce RTX 4050 显卡的较便宜的 SKU。
我们这次评测的配置在网上售价约为 1700 美元。其他选择包括其他 16 英寸多媒体或以工作室为中心的笔记本电脑,如 微星隐形 16,HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16, 戴尔 XPS 16 9640或 三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra.
更多联想评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
91.7 % | 06/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
88.7 % | 04/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
87.2 % | 05/2024 | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.8 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.6 % | 04/2024 | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 18.7 mm | 16.30" | 3840x2400 | |
90.4 % | 03/2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.6 % | 11/2023 | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
连接性
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
交流
网络摄像头
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/9/8/csm_WIN_20240604_22_20_54_Pro_6f32593328.jpg)
显示屏 - 3.2K IPS 和 Mini-LED 选项
联想提供以下三种显示屏选项。所有面板都具有相同的 3200 x 2000 原始分辨率和刷新率,支持高级 Optimus,但不支持 G-Sync。我们的测试机采用了下面加粗的选项,而更高端的 RTX 4070 配置则采用了迷你 LED 选项。
- 3.2K、165 Hz、IPS、400 尼特、100% P3、雾面、非触摸式
- 3.2K,165 Hz,IPS,400 尼特,100% P3,亮面,触摸
- 3.2K,165 Hz,Mini-LED,1200 尼特,100% P3,亮面,触摸
IPS 和迷你 LED 的视觉体验出奇地相似,因为它们的色彩范围和刷新率基本相同。不过,与迷你 LED 相比,IPS 的优势在于黑白响应时间更快,而且没有明显的光晕效应问题。在运行支持 HDR 的内容时,它们之间的差异反而会被放大,而这正是 mini-LED 凭借其出色的对比度和亮度水平真正大放异彩的地方。因此,观看或播放大量 HDR 媒体的用户可能更喜欢 mini-LED,而那些想省钱或不介意放弃 HDR 的用户则可以使用 IPS 获得更传统的体验。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 404.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1012:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.98, calibrated: 0.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
86.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16.00 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16.00 | Dell XPS 16 9640 SDC4196, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.30 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16.00 | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Samsung ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 5% | 2% | 2% | 5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 95.6 | 97 1% | 99.6 4% | 98.3 3% | 98.6 3% | 98.7 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.5 | 86.6 0% | 96.5 12% | 87.8 2% | 88.5 2% | 96.5 12% |
Response Times | -85% | 92% | 92% | 94% | 24% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.4 ? | 22.2 ? -79% | 0.8 ? 94% | 0.82 ? 93% | 0.54 ? 96% | 0.68 ? 95% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8.9 ? | 17 ? -91% | 0.89 ? 90% | 0.85 ? 90% | 0.69 ? 92% | 13.2 ? -48% |
PWM Frequency | 4840 ? | 491.8 ? | 360 ? | 240 ? | 240 ? | |
Screen | 30% | -16% | -7% | -0% | -61% | |
Brightness middle | 404.9 | 651 61% | 399.4 -1% | 366 -10% | 390 -4% | 353 -13% |
Brightness | 390 | 673 73% | 405 4% | 367 -6% | 393 1% | 354 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 93 2% | 98 8% | 96 5% | 98 8% | 98 8% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.22 45% | ||||
Contrast | 1012 | 2959 192% | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.42 | 1.9 21% | 4.05 -67% | 1.3 46% | 1.4 42% | 4.23 -75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.65 | 4.2 10% | 6.69 -44% | 3.6 23% | 2.7 42% | 7.13 -53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.93 | 0.6 35% | 1.02 -10% | 1 -8% | 2.42 -160% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 3 -173% | 1.1 -0% | 2.2 -100% | 2.1 -91% | 2.5 -127% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.18 101% | 2.27 97% | 2.14 103% | 2.27 97% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 6468 100% | 6738 96% | 6419 101% | 6680 97% | 6431 101% | 6642 98% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
7% | 27% /
8% | 29% /
12% | 32% /
17% | -11% /
-31% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise | |
↘ 4.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.3 ms rise | |
↘ 6.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17629 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 全能型多媒体游戏机
测试条件
处理器
核心 Core Ultra 9 185H在我们的 RTX 4050 配置中,其性能与更高端的 RTX 4070 配置中的同款 CPU 相差不到 3 个百分点。它的性能比即将推出的 酷睿 i7-13900H更快的性能,同时还集成了用于人工智能加速任务的 NPU。降级到 酷睿至尊 7 155H配置预计只会对性能产生 5% 至 10% 的影响。 戴尔 XPS 16 9640.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=8) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=8) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (45560 - 53918, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
压力测试
平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度(°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 61 | 39 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.1 | -- | 87 | 53 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.2 | 2550 | 78 | 76 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | 0.4 | 2385 | 70 | 68 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | 0.7 | 2655 | 99 | 76 |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7846 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (71990 - 95718, n=8) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (75449 - 87768, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (70596 - 93871, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (129.6 - 146.1, n=8) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想出货量相同 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115NPCIe4 NVMe 固态硬盘。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
图形性能比预期的要好,3DMark 分数比我们数据库中配备相同GeForce RTX 4050 GPU 的普通笔记本电脑快 10%左右。这一优势在很大程度上归功于联想 75 W 至 100 W 的 TGP 目标值,因为采用相同 GPU 的大多数其他笔记本电脑的 TGP 上限都较低。虽然 Nvidia 控制面板声称 RTX 4050 的总显卡功耗为 100 W,但在运行游戏时,它通常会稳定在 75 W 至 85 W 左右,这在我们上面的压力测试部分得到了体现。
总体性能比RTX 4070 配置低约 25%至 30%,后者可以达到 90 瓦至 100 瓦之间的较高功率范围。这一点对于下面的功耗部分每瓦性能分析非常重要。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 22862 | 30623 | 10234 |
均衡模式 | 21008 (-8%) | 29772 (-3%) | 8401 (-18%) |
电池电量 | 20095 (-12%) | 30278 (-1%) | 7999 (-22%) |
如Fire Strike 结果表所示,在平衡模式下运行对 GPU 性能的影响大于 CPU 性能。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 -2! | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD -1! | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 -2! | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) -2! | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 -2! | |
Framework Laptop 16 -1! | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W -2! | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU -1! | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra -2! | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK -2! | |
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx -3! | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr -1! | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 -2! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 28139 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21063 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9125 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 1846 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
该系统功能强大,足以在原生 3200 x 2000 分辨率下以中等或较低设置运行《赛博朋克 2077》等要求苛刻的游戏。不过,为了获得最佳效果,建议尽可能启用 DLSS,以提高帧率,使其接近 60+ FPS。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 395.6 | 290.5 | 164 | 83.7 | 61 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 174.6 | 148.7 | 145.1 | 138.5 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 182.4 | 121.5 | 84.2 | 61.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 134.8 | 117.7 | 89.4 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 151 | 129 | 121 | 113 | 86 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 432 | 213 | 170.9 | 150 | 99.7 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 181.1 | 141.8 | 93.3 | 72.3 | 49.5 |
F1 22 (2022) | 221 | 219 | 171.5 | 53.4 | 34 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 112.3 | 91.9 | 83.5 | 81.3 | 55 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 101.9 | 79.6 | 67.8 | 58.3 | 36.4 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 25.4 / 25.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44.2 / 52.6 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS | Dell XPS 16 9640 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 14% | 0% | 8% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 23.6 | 24.3 -3% | 22.9 3% | 24.5 -4% | 24.2 -3% | 20.96 11% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 24.3 -3% | 23 3% | 24.5 -4% | 24.2 -3% | 25.28 -7% |
Idle Average * | 25.4 | 24.3 4% | 23 9% | 24.5 4% | 24.2 5% | 25.28 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.4 | 25.8 -2% | 23 9% | 27.5 -8% | 24.2 5% | 25.28 -0% |
Load Average * | 44.2 | 48.1 -9% | 23.8 46% | 39.6 10% | 37.9 14% | 51.88 -17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.9 | 49.7 -2% | 43.8 10% | 49.7 -2% | 41.7 15% | 49 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 52.6 | 53.9 -2% | 43.8 17% | 49.7 6% | 41.7 21% | 51.8 2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在运行苛刻的负载时,热点温度可达 41 摄氏度以上,这比我们在 VivoBook Pro 16 上记录的温度低几度。 华硕 VivoBook Pro 16的温度还要低几度。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | -1% | 8% | 13% | -20% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41 | 41.7 -2% | 42.6 -4% | 39.4 4% | 38.5 6% | 42.6 -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.6 | 46.3 -14% | 47.8 -18% | 36.9 9% | 41.2 -1% | 48.4 -19% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.2 | 26.2 13% | 27.4 9% | 28.2 7% | 23.5 22% | 39.4 -30% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.4 | 27.2 13% | 27.8 11% | 27.4 13% | 24.1 23% | 39.8 -27% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
总体消耗水平非常接近我们在更高端的 Mini-LED RTX 4070 配置上记录的水平。运行 Witcher 3例如,我们的低端配置平均耗电量仅比 RTX 4070 低 5%,但图形性能却比 RTX 4070 低 25% 至 30%。因此,每瓦性能对 RTX 4070 来说非常有利。
用户应该记住,交流适配器的额定功率仅为 170 瓦。由于游戏对功率的要求已经在 150 瓦到 160 瓦之间,因此尝试在游戏时为笔记本电脑充电将导致充电速度非常缓慢。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 3200x2000, 16.00 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, , OLED, 2880x1800, 16.00 | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.30 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16.00 | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -2% | 57% | 32% | 47% | -8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.9 | 10.3 -4% | 5 49% | 7.7 22% | 4.8 52% | 21.06 -113% |
Idle Average * | 16.6 | 21.9 -32% | 6.2 63% | 10.3 38% | 7.5 55% | 24.27 -46% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.2 | 22.4 23% | 14.7 50% | 10.6 64% | 7.9 73% | 25.12 14% |
Load Average * | 100.9 | 96.9 4% | 49.9 51% | 76.5 24% | 79.3 21% | 52.4 48% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 151.8 | 159.6 -5% | 54.5 64% | 126.4 17% | 79.2 48% | 110.2 27% |
Load Maximum * | 182.2 | 173.8 5% | 65 64% | 138.5 24% | 125 31% | 146 20% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
在平衡模式和 Optimus 模式下,显示器设置为 150 尼特时的 WLAN 运行时间与价格更高的 RTX 4070 Mini-LED 配置的运行时间差不多。从表面上看,这个结果有点出人意料,因为 Mini-LED 和 RTX 4070 GPU 比 IPS 和 RTX 4050 对功耗的要求更高,但一旦考虑到 Optimus 模式和测试期间相似的亮度设置,这个数据就很合理了。对于配备独立显卡的 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑来说,9 小时的浏览时间仍然是非常不错的,即使比戴尔 XPS 16 或其他竞争对手稍短一些。 三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra.
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.5 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 96 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -3% | -15% | 16% | 21% | 12% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 540 | 526 -3% | 459 -15% | 629 16% | 656 21% | 606 12% |
H.264 | 692 | 988 | 1076 | 585 | ||
Load | 73 | 116 | 87 | 78 | ||
Reader / Idle | 935 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 如果您愿意付费,联想最好的产品之一
Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 是迄今为止该系列中最令人印象深刻的机型,即使是在没有 RTX 4070 显卡或花哨的迷你 LED 屏幕的低端配置下,它也是 XPS 16 的真正替代品。 XPS 16或 MacBook Pro 16.它的 IPS 显示屏、性能和尺寸均可与戴尔或Apple 的同类产品媲美,而且更易于维护,键盘也比 XPS 好。当然,我们也很欣赏它的各种端口,而这两款竞争机型只有 USB-C。
电池续航时间和风扇噪音等其他因素与更高端的 RTX 4070 配置相比,并没有明显延长或降低。
支持 AI 的联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 不仅是戴尔 XPS 16 或 MacBook Pro 16 的绝佳替代品,而且在一些方面比这两款产品做得更好。
RTX 4050 配置的 1700 美元零售价有点高,因为采用相同 GPU 的游戏笔记本电脑,如 微星超薄 GF63 或 宏碁 Nitro V都能以低于 1000 美元的价格买到。不过,与竞争对手 XPS 16 或 MacBook Pro 15 相比,联想的价格要便宜几百美元,对于那些希望在保留优质用户体验的同时节省一些现金的人来说,这不失为一种有吸引力的解决方案。
价格和供应情况
百思买目前正在销售联想 Yoga Pro 9 16 配置,评测价格为 1700 美元。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
-
06/06/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.