Notebookcheck Logo

联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 笔记本电脑评测：75 WGeForce RTX 4050 性能超群

没有 Mini-LED 一样出色。

作为联想的旗舰机型和最接近 MacBook Pro 16 的竞争对手，即使是低端配置，它也拥有强大的性能。不过，1500 多美元的售价也是联想 Yoga 笔记本电脑中较贵的一款。
Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Geforce Thunderbolt Intel Evo
联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050

Yoga Pro 9 系列是联想多媒体笔记本电脑的旗舰阵容，高于中高档产品 Yoga 7 16 系列和低端 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 系列.最近，我们对最高端的 最高端的 Yoga Pro 9 配置配备迷你 LED 和GeForce RTX 4070 显卡。这次，我们要评测的是配备标准 IPS 和GeForce RTX 4050 显卡的较便宜的 SKU。

我们这次评测的配置在网上售价约为 1700 美元。其他选择包括其他 16 英寸多媒体或以工作室为中心的笔记本电脑，如 微星隐形 16,HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16, 戴尔 XPS 16 9640或 三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra.

更多联想评论：

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 (Yoga Pro 9 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 16 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 83 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 2055 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 100 W TDP, GDDR6, 555.85, Advanced Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3200 x 2000 pixel 236 PPI, LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 10-point capacitive, glossy: yes, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: SDXC
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18.3 x 362.72 x 253.69
Battery
84 Wh, 5285 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 5 MP + IR
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Six speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Vantage, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.147 kg, Power Supply: 580 g
Price
1900 USD
Links
Lenovo homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
91.7 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2024
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		2.1 kg18.3 mm16.00"3200x2000
from EUR 1900
88.7 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		2.1 kg18.3 mm16.00"3200x2000
from EUR 2700
87.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M		1.8 kg18.3 mm16.00"2880x1800
88.6 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Dell XPS 16 9640
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		2.3 kg18.7 mm16.30"3840x2400
90.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		1.8 kg17 mm16.00"2880x1800
from EUR 2799
87.6 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		1.9 kg19 mm16.00"3200x2000

尺寸比较

❌
362.72 mm 253.69 mm 18.3 mm 2.1 kg362.72 mm 253.69 mm 18.3 mm 2.1 kg358.18 mm 240 mm 18.7 mm 2.3 kg357 mm 246 mm 18.3 mm 1.8 kg355.3 mm 252 mm 19 mm 1.9 kg355 mm 250 mm 17 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性

左：电源端口（SlimTip）、HDMI 2.1、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（20 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0）、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 4.0（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort Alt 模式 2.1、Power Delivery 3.0）、3.5 毫米音频
左：电源端口（SlimTip）、HDMI 2.1、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（20 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0）、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 4.0（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort Alt 模式 2.1、Power Delivery 3.0）、3.5 毫米音频
右：网络摄像头 eShutter、SD 读卡器、2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gbit/s）、电源按钮
右：网络摄像头 eShutter、SD 读卡器、2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gbit/s）、电源按钮

SD 读卡器

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Intel Core i9-13900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
163.5 (157.23min - 168.58max) MB/s +90%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
148 MB/s +72%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
86.1 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
78.8 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
78.3 MB/s -9%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Intel Core i9-13900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
232.36 MB/s +158%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
204.3 MB/s +126%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
90.2 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
89.9 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
87.2 MB/s -3%

交流

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1650 (1445min - 1723max) MBit/s +124%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1625 (1476min, 1476.87P1 - 1697max) MBit/s +120%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1608 (1424min - 1752max) MBit/s +118%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1606 (1503min - 1654max) MBit/s +118%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1580 (1483min - 1663max) MBit/s +114%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
737 (581min - 806max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1715 (1675min, 1683.7P1 - 1731max) MBit/s +113%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1701 (1196min - 1751max) MBit/s +111%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1654 (1568min - 1702max) MBit/s +105%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1591 (1476min - 1622max) MBit/s +98%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1551 (1450min - 1626max) MBit/s +93%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
805 (713min - 855max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1626 (1381min - 1818max) MBit/s +51%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1381 (1289min - 1536max) MBit/s +28%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1078 (1020min - 1139max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1639 (1591min - 1742max) MBit/s +30%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1628 (1393min - 1717max) MBit/s +29%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1262 (1155min - 1336max) MBit/s
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1078 (1020-1139)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1262 (1155-1336)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050: 8.97 ∆E min: 2.68 - max: 15.16 ∆E

维护

Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4070 进行对比，内部差异不大
Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4070 进行对比，内部差异不大

显示屏 - 3.2K IPS 和 Mini-LED 选项

联想提供以下三种显示屏选项。所有面板都具有相同的 3200 x 2000 原始分辨率和刷新率，支持高级 Optimus，但不支持 G-Sync。我们的测试机采用了下面加粗的选项，而更高端的 RTX 4070 配置则采用了迷你 LED 选项。

  • 3.2K、165 Hz、IPS、400 尼特、100% P3、雾面、非触摸式
  • 3.2K，165 Hz，IPS，400 尼特，100% P3，亮面，触摸
  • 3.2K，165 Hz，Mini-LED，1200 尼特，100% P3，亮面，触摸

IPS 和迷你 LED 的视觉体验出奇地相似，因为它们的色彩范围和刷新率基本相同。不过，与迷你 LED 相比，IPS 的优势在于黑白响应时间更快，而且没有明显的光晕效应问题。在运行支持 HDR 的内容时，它们之间的差异反而会被放大，而这正是 mini-LED 凭借其出色的对比度和亮度水平真正大放异彩的地方。因此，观看或播放大量 HDR 媒体的用户可能更喜欢 mini-LED，而那些想省钱或不介意放弃 HDR 的用户则可以使用 IPS 获得更传统的体验。

边到边玻璃，支持触摸配置
边到边玻璃，支持触摸配置
今年没有 OLED 选项，只有 IPS 或迷你 LED
今年没有 OLED 选项，只有 IPS 或迷你 LED
清晰的 RGB 子像素，光泽叠加带来的颗粒感极小
清晰的 RGB 子像素，光泽叠加带来的颗粒感极小
即使背光出血问题也不严重
即使背光出血问题也不严重
380.2
cd/m²		397.3
cd/m²		406.7
cd/m²
376.4
cd/m²		404.9
cd/m²		406.5
cd/m²
370.4
cd/m²		392.5
cd/m²		377.2
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LEN160-3.2K tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 406.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 390.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 404.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1012:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87, calibrated: 0.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
86.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16"		Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16"		HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"		Dell XPS 16 9640
SDC4196, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3"		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"		Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Samsung ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Display
0%
5%
2%
2%
5%
Display P3 Coverage
95.6
97
1%
99.6
4%
98.3
3%
98.6
3%
98.7
3%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
99.9
0%
100
0%
100
0%
99.9
0%
99.7
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.5
86.6
0%
96.5
12%
87.8
2%
88.5
2%
96.5
12%
Response Times
-85%
92%
92%
94%
24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.4 ?(6.3, 6.1)
22.2 ?(9.6, 12.6)
-79%
0.8 ?(0.45, 0.35)
94%
0.82 ?(0.43, 0.39)
93%
0.54 ?(0.29, 0.25)
96%
0.68 ?(0.32, 0.36)
95%
Response Time Black / White *
8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1)
17 ?(8.2, 8.8)
-91%
0.89 ?(0.42, 0.47)
90%
0.85 ?(0.46, 0.39)
90%
0.69 ?(0.39, 0.3)
92%
13.2 ?(10.8, 2.4)
-48%
PWM Frequency
4840 ?(100)
491.8 ?(100)
360 ?(90)
240 ?(100)
240 ?(100)
Screen
30%
-16%
-7%
-0%
-61%
Brightness middle
404.9
651
61%
399.4
-1%
366
-10%
390
-4%
353
-13%
Brightness
390
673
73%
405
4%
367
-6%
393
1%
354
-9%
Brightness Distribution
91
93
2%
98
8%
96
5%
98
8%
98
8%
Black Level *
0.4
0.22
45%
Contrast
1012
2959
192%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.42
1.9
21%
4.05
-67%
1.3
46%
1.4
42%
4.23
-75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.65
4.2
10%
6.69
-44%
3.6
23%
2.7
42%
7.13
-53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.93
0.6
35%
1.02
-10%
1
-8%
2.42
-160%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
3
-173%
1.1
-0%
2.2
-100%
2.1
-91%
2.5
-127%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.18 101%
2.27 97%
2.14 103%
2.27 97%
2.4 92%
CCT
6468 100%
6738 96%
6419 101%
6680 97%
6431 101%
6642 98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-18% / 7%
27% / 8%
29% / 12%
32% / 17%
-11% / -31%

* ... smaller is better

对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3

显示器开箱即按照 P3 标准校准，平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别仅为 1.1 和 2.42。因此，对于大多数用户来说，无需进行最终用户校准。

校准前的灰度（对比 P3）
校准前的灰度（对比 P3）
校准前的饱和扫描（对 P3）
校准前的饱和扫描（对 P3）
校准前的 ColorChecker（对比 P3）
校准前的 ColorChecker（对比 P3）
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的 ColorChecker
校准后的 ColorChecker

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 4.1 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.3 ms rise
↘ 6.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8492 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

户外阳光下
户外阳光下
室外阴凉处。与微型 LED 相比，眩光更明显
室外阴凉处。与微型 LED 相比，眩光更明显
户外阳光下
户外阳光下
宽广的 IPS 视角。与微型 LED 相比，色彩和对比度更容易衰减
宽广的 IPS 视角。与微型 LED 相比，色彩和对比度更容易衰减

性能 - 全能型多媒体游戏机

 
 

测试条件

在运行下面的基准测试之前，我们将联想 Vantage 设置为性能模式，将 Nvidia 设置为 dGPU 模式。

请注意，虽然 GPU 可以设置为独立模式，但 Nvidia 控制面板上并没有 "仅限 iGPU "模式。

Vantage 主页屏幕
Vantage 主页屏幕
性能配置文件设置
性能配置文件设置
即使是 RTX 4050 配置也可进行 GPU 超频
即使是 RTX 4050 配置也可进行 GPU 超频
存在检测和电池充电设置
存在检测和电池充电设置

处理器

核心 Core Ultra 9 185H在我们的 RTX 4050 配置中，其性能与更高端的 RTX 4070 配置中的同款 CPU 相差不到 3 个百分点。它的性能比即将推出的 酷睿 i7-13900H更快的性能，同时还集成了用于人工智能加速任务的 NPU。降级到 酷睿至尊 7 155H配置预计只会对性能产生 5% 至 10% 的影响。 戴尔 XPS 16 9640.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01553104656207759301085124013951550170518602015217023252480263527902945Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2824 (2750.84-2985.74)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2931 (2869.44-3004.58)
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø1951 (1885.73-2044.68)
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2707 (2643.06-2817.5)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2195 (2134.59-2575.83)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2244 (2186.27-2513.98)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
80 pt
Alienware m16 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
79.4 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
79.4 pt
Alienware m16 R1 Intel
Intel Core i7-13700HX
70.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
69.3 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
67.8 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
67.5 pt
Framework Laptop 16
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
65.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
64.5 pt
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
64.2 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
 
63.4 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W -2!
Intel Core i9-12900H
61.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.6 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
Intel Core i7-13700H
58.9 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Intel Core i9-13900H
57.5 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
56.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
44.7 pt
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2986 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
189.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
268 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7422 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
710 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
19236 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1798 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
93.7 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
92.4 pt
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.4 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
85.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
 
85.4 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
76.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
73.8 pt

压力测试

系统空闲
系统空闲

在启动 Prime95 压力模式后，CPU 会提升至 3.6 GHz、100 C 和 120 W，然后在大约 70 秒后下降并稳定在 3.1 GHz、90 C 和 83 W。

如果在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行，图形性能会受到影响，这与下面的 GPU 性能结果相辅相成。在性能模式下运行时，Nvidia GPU 的频率为 2855 MHz，功耗为 78 W。 Witcher 3而在平衡模式下则为 2385 MHz 和 63 W。在性能模式下，GPU 的温度也会更高。

Prime95 压力
Prime95 压力
Prime95+FurMark 压力
Prime95+FurMark 压力
Witcher 3 应力（平衡模式）
Witcher 3 应力（平衡模式）
Witcher 3 压力（性能模式）
Witcher 3 压力（性能模式）
平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) GPU 时钟 (MHz) 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) 平均 GPU 温度(°C)
系统闲置 -- -- 61 39
Prime95 压力 3.1 -- 87 53
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 2.2 2550 78 76
Witcher 3 压力（平衡模式） 0.4 2385 70 68
Witcher 3 压力（性能模式） 0.7 2655 99 76

系统性能

PCMark 分数与大多数其他多媒体笔记本电脑相当，表明联想在大多数日常工作负载或编辑任务中的速度并不明显较慢，尽管我们采用了较低端的 RTX 4050 配置。

PCMark 10 标准
PCMark 10 标准
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
7846 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (7431 - 7846, n=2)
7639 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
7547 Points -4%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7084 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7054 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6973 Points -11%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
6958 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7846 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94254 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
94222 MB/s
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
92745 MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
90918 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (69929 - 95718, n=19)
84413 MB/s -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
68720 MB/s -27%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
59266 MB/s -37%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签页时，LatencyMon 显示的 DPC 问题比 RTX 4070 配置更多。在其他方面，以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频也非常完美，没有掉帧记录。

延迟监控
延迟监控
驱动程序列表
驱动程序列表
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2668.9 μs *
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1753.6 μs * +34%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1639.8 μs * +39%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
903.7 μs * +66%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
596.3 μs * +78%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
464.1 μs * +83%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

联想出货量相同 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115NPCIe4 NVMe 固态硬盘。

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7061 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4774 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 439.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 470.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4549 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3077 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.38 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.3 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
90.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
80.7 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
67.7 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
67.3 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
46.4 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
38.3 pt

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7096 (6421.43-7116.69)

图形处理器性能

图形性能比预期的要好，3DMark 分数比我们数据库中配备相同GeForce RTX 4050 GPU 的普通笔记本电脑快 10%左右。这一优势在很大程度上归功于联想 75 W 至 100 W 的 TGP 目标值，因为采用相同 GPU 的大多数其他笔记本电脑的 TGP 上限都较低。虽然 Nvidia 控制面板声称 RTX 4050 的总显卡功耗为 100 W，但在运行游戏时，它通常会稳定在 75 W 至 85 W 左右，这在我们上面的压力测试部分得到了体现。

总体性能比RTX 4070 配置低约 25%至 30%，后者可以达到 90 瓦至 100 瓦之间的较高功率范围。这一点对于下面的功耗部分每瓦性能分析非常重要。

电源配置文件图形得分物理得分综合得分
性能模式228623062310234
均衡模式21008 (-8%)29772 (-3%)8401 (-18%)
电池电量20095 (-12%)30278 (-1%)7999 (-22%)

如Fire Strike 结果表所示，在平衡模式下运行对 GPU 性能的影响大于 CPU 性能。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
钢铁游牧民族
钢铁游牧民族
快速通道
快速通道
Time Spy
Time Spy
皇家港
皇家港
Fire Strike (性能模式）
Fire Strike (性能模式）
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
99.1 pt
Alienware m16 R1 AMD -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
95.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
63.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
55.2 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024) -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
54.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
 
52.2 pt
Dell XPS 16 9640 -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
51 pt
Framework Laptop 16 -1!
AMD Radeon RX 7700S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
50.6 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
41.4 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
40.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33.9 pt
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1185G7
29.2 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx -3!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
26.9 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr -1!
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
13.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 -2!
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
9.8 pt
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 Performance
28139 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21063 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9125 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
1846 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
68 Seconds * -162%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
37 Seconds * -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32 Seconds * -23%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
29 Seconds * -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (25 - 37, n=39)
29 Seconds * -12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
26 Seconds *
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
22 Seconds * +15%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
21 Seconds * +19%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19 Seconds * +27%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
16 Seconds * +38%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds * +50%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
107 Seconds * -118%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
62 Seconds * -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (47 - 175, n=40)
56.1 Seconds * -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
56 Seconds * -14%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
53 Seconds * -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
49 Seconds *
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
41 Seconds * +16%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
36 Seconds * +27%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
32 Seconds * +35%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
23 Seconds * +53%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * +63%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
648 Seconds * -124%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
405 Seconds * -40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (243 - 907, n=40)
396 Seconds * -37%
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
384 Seconds * -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
380 Seconds * -31%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
377 Seconds * -30%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
315 Seconds * -9%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
312 Seconds * -8%
Framework Laptop 16
AMD Radeon RX 7700S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
311 Seconds * -8%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
306 Seconds * -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
289 Seconds *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
285 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
193 Seconds * +33%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
185 Seconds * +36%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

该系统功能强大，足以在原生 3200 x 2000 分辨率下以中等或较低设置运行《赛博朋克 2077》等要求苛刻的游戏。不过，为了获得最佳效果，建议尽可能启用 DLSS，以提高帧率，使其接近 60+ FPS。

Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
96.7 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
80.6 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
77.8 pt
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
63.8 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.2 pt
Baldur's Gate 3 | The Witcher 3 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | Far Cry 5 | Strange Brigade | F1 22 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 High Preset
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.9 fps +44%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
93.5 fps +12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83.5 fps
Framework Laptop 16
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7700S
76.4 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (49.8 - 83.5, n=10)
65.9 fps -21%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
22.6 fps -73%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.7 fps +45%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.8 fps +13%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81.3 fps
Framework Laptop 16
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7700S
73.6 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 81.3, n=10)
64.2 fps -21%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
22.2 fps -73%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79.8 fps +45%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63.8 fps +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
55 fps
Framework Laptop 16
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7700S
51.1 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (32.4 - 55, n=7)
42.1 fps -23%
Baldur's Gate 3 | The Witcher 3 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | Far Cry 5 | Strange Brigade | F1 22 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø75.9 (72-81)
lowmed.highultraQHD
The Witcher 3 (2015) 395.6 290.5 164 83.7 61
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 174.6 148.7 145.1 138.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 182.4 121.5 84.2 61.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 134.8 117.7 89.4
Far Cry 5 (2018) 151 129 121 113 86
Strange Brigade (2018) 432 213 170.9 150 99.7
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 181.1 141.8 93.3 72.3 49.5
F1 22 (2022) 221 219 171.5 53.4 34
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 112.3 91.9 83.5 81.3 55
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 101.9 79.6 67.8 58.3 36.4

排放量

系统噪音

风扇噪音表现与我们在较高的 RTX 4070 配置上记录到的噪音几乎完全相同，这表明较弱的 RTX 4050 配置尽管 GPU 速度较慢，但噪音并没有降低。

风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：3DMark 06，绿色：3DMark 06，橙色：3DMark 06Witcher 3绿色Prime95+FurMark 压力）
风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：3DMark 06，绿色：3DMark 06，橙色：3DMark 06Witcher 3绿色Prime95+FurMark 压力）

Noise Level

Idle
23.6 / 25.4 / 25.4 dB(A)
Load
44.2 / 52.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.539.141.235.136.12528.727.229.129.527.33124.625.32725.926.44028.524.323.125.124.55025.526.421.721.627.26327.929.12422.524.48029.428.622.624.92910027.227.422.624.927.712531.830.921.121.827.916031.126.717.217.13820028.726.718.918.530.125033.126.717.315.532.331533.227.617.616.733.740033.529.317.814.636.750036.232.516.812.739.663036.932.915.710.939.480034.530.813.112.137100035.631.412.71038.7125035.431.211.89.638.9160035.931.811.79.739.3200035.231.211.810.138.9250036.131.512.910.539.8315038.133.713.110.741.7400038.133.81211.24250003935.212.311.542.5630040.433.612.111.644.5800036.12712.311.442.11000031.523.512.112.538.11250027.719.411.611.534.21600022.314.410.910.928.8SPL48.944.225.423.652.6N6.94.80.70.58.9median 35.2median 30.9median 12.9median 11.5median 38.7Delta3.12.52.32.53.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N		Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N		HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02		Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ		Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Noise
-2%
14%
0%
8%
-2%
off / environment *
23.6
24.3
-3%
22.9
3%
24.5
-4%
24.2
-3%
20.96
11%
Idle Minimum *
23.6
24.3
-3%
23
3%
24.5
-4%
24.2
-3%
25.28
-7%
Idle Average *
25.4
24.3
4%
23
9%
24.5
4%
24.2
5%
25.28
-0%
Idle Maximum *
25.4
25.8
-2%
23
9%
27.5
-8%
24.2
5%
25.28
-0%
Load Average *
44.2
48.1
-9%
23.8
46%
39.6
10%
37.9
14%
51.88
-17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48.9
49.7
-2%
43.8
10%
49.7
-2%
41.7
15%
49
-0%
Load Maximum *
52.6
53.9
-2%
43.8
17%
49.7
6%
41.7
21%
51.8
2%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在运行苛刻的负载时，热点温度可达 41 摄氏度以上，这比我们在 VivoBook Pro 16 上记录的温度低几度。 华硕 VivoBook Pro 16的温度还要低几度。

后排气管
后排气管
游戏时交流适配器温度超过 56 C
游戏时交流适配器温度超过 56 C
Max. Load
 39.8 °C41 °C39.6 °C 
 35 °C38.2 °C37.8 °C 
 29 °C29.6 °C29.2 °C 
Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 35.5 °C
40.2 °C40.6 °C38.8 °C
30.2 °C38.4 °C31.4 °C
29.6 °C30 °C30.6 °C
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  57.4 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
系统空闲（顶部）
系统空闲（顶部）
系统空闲（底部）
系统空闲（底部）
Witcher 3 压力（上）
Witcher 3 压力（上）
Witcher 3 压力（底部）
Witcher 3 压力（底部）
Prime95+FurMark 压力（上）
Prime95+FurMark 压力（上）
Prime95+FurMark 应力（底部）
Prime95+FurMark 应力（底部）
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M		Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Heat
3%
-1%
8%
13%
-20%
Maximum Upper Side *
41
41.7
-2%
42.6
-4%
39.4
4%
38.5
6%
42.6
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
40.6
46.3
-14%
47.8
-18%
36.9
9%
41.2
-1%
48.4
-19%
Idle Upper Side *
30.2
26.2
13%
27.4
9%
28.2
7%
23.5
22%
39.4
-30%
Idle Bottom *
31.4
27.2
13%
27.8
11%
27.4
13%
24.1
23%
39.8
-27%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

最大音量下的粉红噪声
最大音量下的粉红噪声
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.541.236.52527.529.127.53125.52725.54025.423.125.45041.521.741.56353.32453.38063.522.663.510067.922.667.912568.521.168.51607517.27520073.318.973.325073.317.373.331573.717.673.740075.617.875.650078.616.878.663077.515.777.580077.213.177.2100073.712.773.7125071.511.871.5160074.511.774.5200074.911.874.9250071.212.971.2315072.413.172.4400073.11273.1500069.612.369.663006812.168800069.112.369.1100006812.1681250063.411.663.41600062.410.962.4SPL85.525.485.5N740.774median 73.3median 12.9median 73.3Delta2.92.32.926.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量

总体消耗水平非常接近我们在更高端的 Mini-LED RTX 4070 配置上记录的水平。运行 Witcher 3例如，我们的低端配置平均耗电量仅比 RTX 4070 低 5%，但图形性能却比 RTX 4070 低 25% 至 30%。因此，每瓦性能对 RTX 4070 来说非常有利。

用户应该记住，交流适配器的额定功率仅为 170 瓦。由于游戏对功率的要求已经在 150 瓦到 160 瓦之间，因此尝试在游戏时为笔记本电脑充电将导致充电速度非常缓慢。

3DMark 06 消耗量
3DMark 06 消耗量
Witcher 3 1080p 超高耗电量
Witcher 3 1080p 超高耗电量
在启动 Prime95 压力时，耗电量会在大约 70 秒内飙升至 183 W，然后由于 Turbo Boost 潜能有限而下降并稳定在 137 W。
在启动 Prime95 压力时，耗电量会在大约 70 秒内飙升至 183 W，然后由于 Turbo Boost 潜能有限而下降并稳定在 137 W。
Prime95+FurMark 在 10 秒处启动应力测试
Prime95+FurMark 在 10 秒处启动应力测试
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 1.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9.9 / 16.6 / 29.2 Watt
Load midlight 100.9 / 182.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 3200x2000, 16"		Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16"		HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"		Dell XPS 16 9640
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3"		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"		Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Power Consumption
-2%
57%
32%
47%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
9.9
10.3
-4%
5
49%
7.7
22%
4.8
52%
21.06
-113%
Idle Average *
16.6
21.9
-32%
6.2
63%
10.3
38%
7.5
55%
24.27
-46%
Idle Maximum *
29.2
22.4
23%
14.7
50%
10.6
64%
7.9
73%
25.12
14%
Load Average *
100.9
96.9
4%
49.9
51%
76.5
24%
79.3
21%
52.4
48%
Witcher 3 ultra *
151.8
159.6
-5%
54.5
64%
126.4
17%
79.2
48%
110.2
27%
Load Maximum *
182.2
173.8
5%
65
64%
138.5
24%
125
31%
146
20%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø151.8 (145-169.1)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø159.6 (156.5-163.4)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø173.7 (157.8-182.2)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø170.7 (163.8-173.8)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.9 (10.8-17.6)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø14.3 (12.9-16.6)

Power Consumption external Monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø152.8 (135-182.7)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø130.3 (112.3-166.6)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø168 (159.3-174.6)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø156 (150.8-159.1)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø161.1 (147-170.1)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø142.8 (135.5-155.9)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø148.1 (145-166.8)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø149.6 (143.5-152.7)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.3 (8.95-16.1)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.45 (3.47-11)

电池寿命

在平衡模式和 Optimus 模式下，显示器设置为 150 尼特时的 WLAN 运行时间与价格更高的 RTX 4070 Mini-LED 配置的运行时间差不多。从表面上看，这个结果有点出人意料，因为 Mini-LED 和 RTX 4070 GPU 比 IPS 和 RTX 4050 对功耗的要求更高，但一旦考虑到 Optimus 模式和测试期间相似的亮度设置，这个数据就很合理了。对于配备独立显卡的 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑来说，9 小时的浏览时间仍然是非常不错的，即使比戴尔 XPS 16 或其他竞争对手稍短一些。 三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
9h 00min
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh		Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh		HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh		Dell XPS 16 9640
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.5 Wh		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh		Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 96 Wh
Battery Runtime
-3%
-15%
16%
21%
12%
WiFi v1.3
540
526
-3%
459
-15%
629
16%
656
21%
606
12%
H.264
692
988
1076
585
Load
73
116
87
78
Reader / Idle
935

Pros

+ 比平均水平更快的GeForce RTX 4050 性能
+ 强大的处理器性能
+ 不错的集成扬声器
+ 易于升级的存储

Cons

- 并不比 RTX 4070 配置更安静
- 游戏时 CPU 温度非常高
- 价格昂贵；每美元性能较低
- 没有 G-Sync 或 OLED 显示屏选项

结论 - 如果您愿意付费，联想最好的产品之一

评测中联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050
评测中联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050

Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 是迄今为止该系列中最令人印象深刻的机型，即使是在没有 RTX 4070 显卡或花哨的迷你 LED 屏幕的低端配置下，它也是 XPS 16 的真正替代品。 XPS 16或 MacBook Pro 16.它的 IPS 显示屏、性能和尺寸均可与戴尔或Apple 的同类产品媲美，而且更易于维护，键盘也比 XPS 好。当然，我们也很欣赏它的各种端口，而这两款竞争机型只有 USB-C。

电池续航时间和风扇噪音等其他因素与更高端的 RTX 4070 配置相比，并没有明显延长或降低。

支持 AI 的联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 不仅是戴尔 XPS 16 或 MacBook Pro 16 的绝佳替代品，而且在一些方面比这两款产品做得更好。

RTX 4050 配置的 1700 美元零售价有点高，因为采用相同 GPU 的游戏笔记本电脑，如 微星超薄 GF63 或 宏碁 Nitro V都能以低于 1000 美元的价格买到。不过，与竞争对手 XPS 16 或 MacBook Pro 15 相比，联想的价格要便宜几百美元，对于那些希望在保留优质用户体验的同时节省一些现金的人来说，这不失为一种有吸引力的解决方案。

价格和供应情况

百思买目前正在销售联想 Yoga Pro 9 16 配置，评测价格为 1700 美元。

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 - 06/06/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
72 / 80 → 90%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battery
85 / 95 → 90%
Display
88%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
97%
Temperature
90 / 95 → 95%
Noise
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
98%
Camera
58 / 85 → 68%
Average
84%
92%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

from EUR 1900
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 笔记本电脑评测：75 WGeForce RTX 4050 性能超群
Allen Ngo, 2024-06-10 (Update: 2024-06-10)