惠普 Envy x360 英特尔 i7-1355U 可折叠机型评测:英特尔优于 AMD
我们测试了惠普 Envy x360 15 去年,我们刚刚测试了惠普 Envy x360 15 的 AMD 版本,但英特尔处理器去年就已经开始在这款可转换机上使用了。戴尔更换了 i7-1260P Alder Lake 处理器换成了英特尔猛禽湖 i7-1355U取代了 i7-1260P Alder Lake 处理器。机身与前代产品几乎完全相同,也与今年的 AMD 版本的惠普 Envy x360 15.我们的测试设备不提供专用显卡,因此依赖于英特尔 Iris Xe G7 96EUsiGPU。
新款惠普 Envy x360 15 的宣传重点是 IMAX Enhanced 认证。只有当系统的显示屏和扬声器符合 IMAX 和 DTS 的严格质量标准时,才能获得该证书。因此,通过 Prime Video 和 Netflix 等流媒体服务提供的 IMAX Enhanced 电影可以最大限度地复制 IMAX 影院体验。英特尔变体的基本版本起价为 1,099 美元。
为了评估惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔版的性能,我们比较了 AMD机箱和显示器完全相同的 AMD 型号。此外 前一年的机型同样采用 AMD 处理器的前一年的机型也被用于比较。联想 联想 ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU也是一个可能的竞争对手,因为它采用了相同的 i7-1355U 处理器.其他竞争对手包括 联想 Yoga 7-14ARB G7、戴尔 戴尔Latitude 9440 2-in-1和 联想 IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8.
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.1 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.8 kg | 18.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
90 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 1.4 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.8 kg | 18.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
86.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8 | 1.9 kg | 18.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 |
外壳 - 高质量,无实际弱点
惠普 Envy x360 15 的英特尔机型采用了与 AMD 处理器机型相同的机箱。由于我们已经在 AMD 机型的评测中详细介绍了机箱,因此请参考我们的 HP Envy x360 15 AMD (2023)的评测中获取更多信息。不过,我们测试的配备英特尔处理器的惠普 Envy x360 15 采用的是自然银铝色。与 AMD 测试设备的夜幕黑铝相比,这里的指纹更不明显。
输入/输出 - 与英特尔机型的连接性更好
惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔版提供的端口与 AMD 版几乎完全相同。 AMD 变体但优势明显:右侧的两个 USB-C 端口还支持 Thunderbolt 4。因此,它们也适用于充电,但在连接不同显示器时要灵活得多,而且传输速率明显更高,可达 40 Gbit/s。
SD 读卡器
惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔的 SD 卡读卡器速度并不慢,但遗憾的是,它跟不上惠普 Envy x360 15 AMD (2023) 的出色表现。 惠普 Envy x360 15 AMD (2023).
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng |
交流
英特尔版本还使用了 WiFi 6E 芯片。这里安装的不是联发科芯片,而是英特尔芯片,但两个 WiFi 模块的性能几乎相同。因此,与其他转换器相比,性能仍略低于平均水平。
网络摄像头
内置网络摄像头提供的图像比 AMD 变体.不过,500 万像素传感器提供的图像质量仍然优于大多数竞争对手。红外和 Windows Hello 功能以及惠普软件的其他附加功能也一应俱全。
配件和保修 - 英特尔机型还缺少签字笔
惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔版的包装和配件与 AMD 版完全相同。 AMD 版本.因此,在许多产品图片中可以看到的输入笔在这里也没有提供。
英特尔机型的包装环保策略也值得商榷。电缆收纳盒不是到处都使用环保包装,而是用硬纸板制成,但电源装置则用铝箔收缩包装。
在美国,惠普为这款可转换机提供 1 年保修。
维护 - 底板仅用 4 个螺钉固定
HP Envy x360 15 Intel (2023) 的底板只用四颗螺丝固定,因此很容易松开。不过,我们建议使用撬棍和吸盘从面板下方撬开固定夹。我们在拆卸 AMD 版 15(2023)的底部面板时遇到的问题要多得多。 AMD 版我们在拆卸 AMD 版敞篷车的底板时遇到了更多问题。由于底盘基本相同,不同设备的可操作性似乎有所不同。在内部,M.2-2280 PCIe 插槽和 WiFi 模块可以更换。 电池也只需 5 颗螺丝就能拆下。
输入设备 - 整体性非常好
键盘和触控板与 AMD 版没有区别。更多详情,请参阅我们对 HP Envy x360 15 AMD (2023).
显示屏 - OLED,有小问题
搭载英特尔处理器的惠普 Envy x360 15 (2023) 和搭载 AMD 处理器的惠普 Envy x360 15 (2023) 都采用了同样的三星 OLED 显示屏。不过,与 HP Envy x360 15 AMD显示屏之间存在差异。平均亮度略低于 380 尼特,非常接近,而且更稳定。
不过,事实证明,英特尔变体的 OLED 面板在校准前和校准后的平均 DeltaE 值都更差。校准前的色彩值为 4.7,校准后为 3.8。相比之下,AMD 版本在校准前的色彩值为 3.1,校准后可提高到 2.4。灰度的平均 DeltaE 值也存在类似差异。英特尔型号在校准前为 5.2,校准后为 2.9。AMD 模型校准前为 2.9,校准后改进为 0.6。这可能是因为 AMD iGPU 在驱动显示器方面比英特尔 iGPU 稍胜一筹。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 377.48 cd/m²
Contrast: 7604:1 (Black: 0.05 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.79
ΔE Greyscale 6.62 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.82% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.43% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng Samsung SDC416C, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng Samsung SDC416C, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx BOE08A8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU SDC ATNA33AA06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 3% | -52% | -12% | 3% | -52% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 96.43 | 99.93 4% | 99.9 4% | 39.6 -59% | 77.2 -20% | 99.6 3% | 39.8 -59% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.82 | 100 1% | 100 1% | 58.5 -41% | 99.6 1% | 100 1% | 58 -41% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 93.76 | 95.51 2% | 97.2 4% | 40.9 -56% | 77.4 -17% | 97.1 4% | 41.1 -56% |
Response Times | 111% | 251% | -1047% | -1342% | 29% | -725% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3 ? | 3 ? -0% | 1 ? 67% | 43.6 ? -1353% | 53.5 ? -1683% | 1.9 ? 37% | 30.2 ? -907% |
Response Time Black / White * | 3 ? | 20 ? -567% | 1 ? 67% | 25.2 ? -740% | 33 ? -1000% | 2.1 ? 30% | 19.3 ? -543% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 500 ? 900% | 360 ? 620% | 60 ? 20% | |||
Screen | 3% | 22% | -93% | -74% | 18% | -94% | |
Brightness middle | 380.2 | 384 1% | 386 2% | 297.8 -22% | 532.4 40% | 367.5 -3% | 335.2 -12% |
Brightness | 381 | 380 0% | 389 2% | 271 -29% | 502 32% | 370 -3% | 316 -17% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 98 0% | 81 -17% | 91 -7% | 98 0% | 86 -12% |
Black Level * | 0.05 | 0.05 -0% | 0.05 -0% | 0.35 -600% | 0.48 -860% | 0.29 -480% | |
Contrast | 7604 | 7680 1% | 7720 2% | 851 -89% | 1109 -85% | 1156 -85% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.68 | 4.68 -0% | 2.6 44% | 5.16 -10% | 2.33 50% | 4.61 1% | 7.49 -60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.06 | 7.06 -0% | 4.8 32% | 19.76 -180% | 5.99 15% | 7.68 -9% | 22.25 -215% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.79 | 3.79 -0% | 1.8 53% | 2.28 40% | 0.92 76% | 0.66 83% | 2.17 43% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.62 | 5.2 21% | 2.3 65% | 2.2 67% | 1.6 76% | 2.7 59% | 6.9 -4% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.18 101% | 2.21 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 7651 85% | 7651 85% | 6121 106% | 6678 97% | 6314 103% | 6079 107% | 5988 109% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 39% /
24% | 92% /
64% | -397% /
-221% | -476% /
-242% | 17% /
17% | -290% /
-175% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise | |
↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise | |
↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 50 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 英特尔与 AMD
惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔 2023 机型采用了第 13 代处理器,取代了英特尔酷睿 i7-1260P 处理器。 英特尔酷睿 i7-1260P处理器。测试设备也没有专用显卡,而是依靠Intel Iris XE Graphics G7 96EUs iGPU。.
测试条件
除了 Windows 电源模式外,还可以通过惠普命令中心对敞篷车的 TDP 进行进一步设置。 在我们的测试中,在惠普命令中心和 Windows 性能设置中选择了性能模式。如果不使用惠普命令中心,就无法发挥设备的最大性能。
与 AMD 版可转换机一样,惠普命令中心提供四种不同的性能模式。与 AMD 模式不同的是,TDP 只在四种模式中的三种模式下发生变化。在冷却 和静音 模式下,TDP 保持不变。
性能 | 平衡型 | 冷却 | 安静型 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CPU PL1 (HWInfo) | 30 瓦 | 25 瓦 | 12 瓦 | 12 瓦 |
CPU PL2 (HWInfo) | 46 瓦 | 46 瓦 | 28 瓦 | 28 瓦 |
处理器
英特尔版本的惠普 Envy x360 15 (2023) 采用了 酷睿 i7-1355U这是一款基于 Raptor-Lake 的高端处理器。CPU 性能与我们数据库中配备相同芯片的普通笔记本完全相当。与 联想 ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU相比,这款可转换笔记本的性能要高出 2%。AMD 版本 AMD 版本整体性能高出近 4%。
不过,比较结果还显示,惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔版在单核基准测试中的表现明显优于采用 AMD 处理器的 Envy x360 15。例如,在单核基准测试 Cinebench R20 中,酷睿 i7-1355U 的成绩比 AMD 处理器高出 22%。配备 AMD 芯片的机型的多核性能更高,这也在意料之中。
在 Cinebench R15 多线程测试中,惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔版在第一次运行后就陷入困境并急剧下降。从第十三次运行开始,性能再次小幅下降,但随后又再次上升。英特尔芯片的温度略高,为 81 °C(177.8 °F)。AMD 版机型的平均温度略低于 79 ℃(174.2 ℉)。在 Cinebench R15 循环中,惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔版的平均时钟频率为 2.6 GHz。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 -1! | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (6936 - 10252, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1687 - 1889, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1970, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2849 - 3907, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (654 - 725, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1206 - 1735, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (237 - 267, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (328 - 503, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (30255 - 42092, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5301 - 5911, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (7507 - 9328, n=18) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1678 - 1872, n=18) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2003, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (7.83 - 11.4, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (41.1 - 108.6, n=18) | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (0.4481 - 0.832, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (468 - 25226, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5673 - 8424, n=18) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (29580 - 42706, n=18) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4764, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1529 - 2200, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21547 - 66907, n=18) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (659 - 14835, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (4045 - 5426, n=18) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (14596 - 21627, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (31432 - 75408, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (454 - 684, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (254 - 13175, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2991 - 4453, n=18) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21800 - 46154, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
系统性能
与普通可折叠电脑相比,惠普 Envy x360 15 Intel 在这方面取得了不俗的成绩。但是 配备 AMD 处理器的 HP Envy x360 15在 PCMark 10 基准测试中几乎高出 10%。Crossmark 基准测试再次显示了英特尔芯片更出色的单核性能,因此这款可折叠电脑的成绩比 AMD 处理器高出 17%。不过 ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
可折叠本在 AIDA64 基准测试中的表现也很出色,比惠普 Envy x360 AMD 高出 39%。不过,由于 ThinkBook 在此方面的表现也更好,因此 酷睿 i7-1355UHP Envy x360 15 Intel (2023) 中的酷睿 i7-1355U 无法充分发挥其性能。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5455 - 5933, n=15) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10203 - 11822, n=15) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6763 - 7536, n=15) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5723 - 6712, n=15) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1478 - 1643, n=15) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1444 - 1665, n=15) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1563 - 1732, n=15) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1217 - 1681, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng |
PCMark 10 Score | 5687 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35017 - 71600, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (38551 - 73377, n=18) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35910 - 93342, n=18) | |
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (72.2 - 346, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 显示,惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔版的 DPC 问题明显少于 AMD 版。 AMD 变体.不过,结果仍不理想,因此英特尔版本也不太适合使用实时音频软件。不过,随着未来 BIOS 和驱动程序的更新,情况随时可能发生变化。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔版安装的存储设备与其他可转换设备相比,性能低于平均水平。虽然对于大多数用户来说,这个速度已经足够,而且在日常使用中并不明显,但与 AMD 版本相比 AMD 变体显示速度相差近 48%。遗憾的是,惠普没有使用西部数据的 PCIe 4.0 M.2 固态硬盘。这里安装的是英特尔 M.2 固态硬盘。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
显卡 - Intel Iris Xe 对 Radeon RX Vega
在我们的 惠普 Envy x360 15 AMD 评论中的评测中,我们曾批评过惠普没有将 CPU 与功能更强大的 AMD iGPU 搭配使用。通过与这款英特尔测试设备的对比,我们发现这种批评是有道理的。Iris XE Graphics G7 96 EUs iGPU在合成基准测试中,惠普 Envy x360 15 Intel Convertible 的 Iris XE Graphics G7 96 EUs iGPU 的性能比 AMD iGPU 高出 11%。
不过,对图形处理器有更高要求的用户也可以选择惠普 Envy x360 15 将 Intel Core i7-1355U 与 英伟达GeForce RTX 3050.即使有了这块专用显卡,这台可折叠电脑也不会成为真正的游戏玩家,但其性能要比其他使用 iGPU 的电脑高得多。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7017 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21584 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4963 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1795 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在大多数游戏中,惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔版的表现略好于其 AMD 版。 AMD.性能差异非常小,因此两款设备在这方面没有明显区别。不过,与 联想 ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU进行比较,后者也采用了 酷睿 i7-1355U再次显示了惠普 Envy x360 中英特尔处理器的极限。ThinkBook 的性能比惠普 Envy x360 高出 8%。
竞争对手一览 联想 Yoga 7-14ARB G7也显示了采用性能更强的 AMD Radeon 680M或 780M 的能力。联想便携式电脑的 iGPU 平均高出 50%。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (10 - 123.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (7.07 - 114.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 110 | 95 | 24 | 10 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 97 | 58 | 26 | 15 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 105.8 | 81.3 | 62.1 | 54.7 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 46 | 24 | 17 | 12 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 52.1 | 28.9 | 30 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 91 | 39.1 | 31.1 | 25.1 |
排放 - 使用英特尔时噪音最小
噪音
就像 AMD 变体HP Envy x360 15 Intel 在中低负载下也相当安静。与其他可转换设备相比,测试设备表现良好,没有出现任何明显的噪音。27 dB(A)的平均负载噪音甚至优于 AMD 的同类产品,仅次于 惠普 Envy x360 15 2022.英特尔机型在负载情况下的最大噪音也略低于 AMD 机型。 联想 IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8
因此,惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔可折叠本非常适合在图书馆或办公室工作。由于该设备即使在负载情况下也不会发出特别大的声音,因此即使是要求较高的应用程序也可以相对安静地使用。
,但在测试中我们发现,当设备放在腿上时,声音会自动增大,并始终至少达到 35 dB(A)。因此,使用建议仅适用于桌子或其他坚硬的表面。
我们没有注意到任何线圈啸叫或其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.8 / 25.8 / 25.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 27.2 / 40.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.8 dB(A) |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng Vega 8, R7 7730U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02 | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx Vega 8, R7 5825U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | -10% | 9% | -3% | -3% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 25.8 | 25.8 -0% | 24.5 5% | 22.7 12% | 24.1 7% | 24.3 6% | 23.1 10% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.8 | 25.9 -0% | 24.5 5% | 22.7 12% | 24.3 6% | 24.3 6% | 23.3 10% |
Idle Average * | 25.8 | 25.9 -0% | 24.5 5% | 22.7 12% | 24.3 6% | 24.3 6% | 23.3 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.8 | 25.9 -0% | 28.1 -9% | 22.7 12% | 24.3 6% | 24.3 6% | 23.3 10% |
Load Average * | 27.2 | 32.2 -18% | 42.8 -57% | 23.3 14% | 36.3 -33% | 38.2 -40% | 37.3 -37% |
Load Maximum * | 40.2 | 40.37 -0% | 42.8 -6% | 43.4 -8% | 44.5 -11% | 41.8 -4% | 38.6 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.8 | 43.4 | 44.5 | 41.9 | 38.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
惠普 Envy x360 15 的英特尔处理器产生的温度比我们测量的 AMD 处理器高得多。 AMD的温度要高得多。在空闲模式下,笔记本右上方的温度最高可达 34 °C(93.2 °F)。这意味着英特尔机型的平均温度比 AMD 机型高出 4 °C。不过,在负载情况下,温度差异相对较小。在这种情况下,底部的峰值温度仅比 HP Envy x360 AMD 高出不到 3 °C。负载下的平均温度仅高出 0.7 °C,为 37.8 °C(100 °F)。因此,温度始终保持在可接受的范围内,不会令人讨厌。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.5 °C / 88.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-3.4 °C / -6.1 F).
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | 11% | 16% | 4% | 14% | 5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 37.8 | 42.3 -12% | 38.5 -2% | 36.2 4% | 40.8 -8% | 34.2 10% | 39.4 -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.1 | 45.4 -5% | 40.3 6% | 37.8 12% | 40 7% | 35.8 17% | 38.8 10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 34 | 26.2 23% | 27.9 18% | 25.4 25% | 30.4 11% | 28.6 16% | 31.2 8% |
Idle Bottom * | 35.1 | 26.6 24% | 27.8 21% | 26.6 24% | 32.8 7% | 30.4 13% | 32.8 7% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 英特尔比 AMD 更经济
耗电量
在空闲模式下,惠普 Envy x360 英特尔版的平均功耗为 6.4 瓦,因此比 AMD 版低了 1.4 瓦。 AMD 版本低 1.4 瓦。.不过,英特尔机型的最大功耗为 12.5 瓦,明显高于 AMD 机型。联想 联想 ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU在这方面的表现惊人地相似。可能 AMD 处理器能更好地调节 OLED 显示屏的能耗峰值。
在负载情况下,惠普 Envy x360 英特尔版的平均功耗为 41.7 瓦,略低于 AMD 版。在Witcher 3 Ultra 测试中,差异最为明显。在这项测试中,英特尔机型的耗电量仅为 28.2 瓦,而 AMD 机型的耗电量为 41.7 瓦。不过,AMD 可转换机型在Witcher 3 Ultra 测试中的表现也略胜一筹,平均 FPS 也更高。
在最大负载下,惠普 Envy x360 英特尔版的功耗为 64.3 瓦,这意味着 65 瓦的电源完全够用,不会出现放电现象。
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
Idle | 5.98 / 6.42 / 12.55 Watt |
Load |
41.7 / 64.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng R7 7730U, Vega 8, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -12% | -6% | 1% | -7% | -12% | -17% | -4% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.98 | 5.1 15% | 5.78 3% | 3.9 35% | 4.2 30% | 7.2 -20% | 8 -34% | 5.34 ? 11% | 5.21 ? 13% |
Idle Average * | 6.42 | 8.2 -28% | 7.84 -22% | 7.2 -12% | 6.9 -7% | 7.9 -23% | 10.6 -65% | 8.55 ? -33% | 8.16 ? -27% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.55 | 8.7 31% | 7.98 36% | 7.3 42% | 7.8 38% | 12.7 -1% | 10.7 15% | 10.8 ? 14% | 11.1 ? 12% |
Load Average * | 41.7 | 51.4 -23% | 42.3 -1% | 46.7 -12% | 46 -10% | 37.6 10% | 46.8 -12% | 45.3 ? -9% | 46.2 ? -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 28.2 | 46.3 -64% | 41.7 -48% | 41.1 -46% | 51.9 -84% | 39.1 -39% | 27.7 2% | ||
Load Maximum * | 64.3 | 64.8 -1% | 65 -1% | 64.8 -1% | 68.2 -6% | 65 -1% | 68.3 -6% | 67.5 ? -5% | 67 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
HP Envy x360 英特尔版的电池续航时间明显优于 AMD 版。 AMD.平均而言,电池续航时间比转换机的整体平均水平分别高出 24% 和 16%。在调整亮度的 WLAN 测试中,电池续航时间为 9 小时 36 分钟。在最大亮度下,仍可使用 6 小时 27 分钟。AMD 机型分别只能使用 8 小时 47 分钟和 5 小时 43 分钟。
在负载情况下,惠普 Envy x360 英特尔版也取得了不错的成绩,在我们使用 BattteryEater 进行的测试中,它可以使用 2 小时 53 分钟,比 AMD 机型多用了一个多小时。与我们选择的竞争对手相比,它的负载值也非常高。其他可转换机型的续航时间都远远不及它。
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 71 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng R7 7730U, Vega 8, 55 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -18% | -24% | -18% | -31% | -36% | -16% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 576 | 584 1% | 527 -9% | 612 6% | 555 -4% | 481 -16% | 594 ? 3% |
Load | 173 | 110 -36% | 107 -38% | 100 -42% | 73 -58% | 76 -56% | 114.9 ? -34% |
H.264 | 762 | 773 ? | |||||
Reader / Idle | 1198 | 1423 | 927 | 1344 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论--英特尔变体在单核性能、图形处理和电池续航时间方面更胜一筹,但在显示屏方面存在不足
惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔版与相同的 AMD 版并驾齐驱 AMD 变体.该处理器在单核应用方面具有优势,但在多核性能方面稍显落后。
显示屏也是同样出色的 OLED,但遗憾的是,惠普 Envy x360 英特尔并没有实现很好的色彩空间覆盖。我们怀疑 AMD 的 iGPU 驱动屏幕的效果略好于英特尔 iGPU。因此,专业摄影师和摄像师应该选择 AMD 版。不过,OLED 显示屏是电影和系列剧的理想选择,而且 IMAX Enhanced 认证表明,该屏幕针对相应的 IMAX Enhanced 电影进行了优化,可以按预期显示电影。
另一方面,英特尔处理器的优势在于安装了两个 Thunderbolt 4,这使得 AMD 机型本已非常出色的设备几乎完美无缺。雷电端口都在同一侧,但专用的全尺寸 SD 读卡器和 HDMI 2.1 端口是一个值得欢迎的补偿。
惠普 Envy x360 15 英特尔版最大的优势可能是电池续航时间。英特尔机型的运行时间明显长于 AMD 机型,而且效果非常好,尤其是在负载情况下。配备英特尔 iGPU 的测试设备在合成测试和游戏测试中都击败了惠普 Envy x360 15 AMD。
惠普Envy x360 15英特尔可折叠笔记本电脑的整体性能非常出色,在很多方面都胜过AMD笔记本电脑。
因此,选择配备英特尔还是 AMD 处理器的 HP Envy x360 完全取决于个人需求。如果想获得更精确的显示效果和更好的多核性能,建议选择 AMD 处理器,而英特尔处理器则在单核性能、电池续航时间、电源管理、连接性和图形性能方面表现出色。
价格和供应情况
在惠普的美国网店,与我们测试机型相同的配置售价为 1099.99 美元。
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng
- 10/04/2023 v7 (old)
Philip Macdonald
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.