三星Galaxy A05s 评测--配备 90 赫兹屏幕的廉价智能手机

Name: Samsung Galaxy A05s
Brand: Samsung

船上有重要的东西吗？

2024 年最便宜的三星智能手机名为Galaxy A05s。这款 6.7 英寸设备的官方售价为 159 欧元，具备日常使用所需的一切功能，但功能不多。我们将在测试中了解这是否足以让竞争对手望尘莫及。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/14/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Galaxy A Smartphone Touchscreen

三星的入门级智能手机经过改头换面后，与 A04s 相比有了很大改进。 Galaxy A04s，尤其是在外壳和显示屏方面。虽然仍然没有 5G，但配备了 90Hz 显示屏、50MP 摄像头和 5000 毫安时电池，充电功率可达 25 瓦。不过，你必须单独购买电源。

在测试中，我们将了解三星Galaxy A05s 与其他经济实惠的智能手机相比表现如何，以及与前代产品（目前仍有售，但已接近 100 欧元大关）相比，它在哪些方面做得更好。

Test device courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy A05s (Galaxy A00 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memory

4 GB

Display

6.70 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitive, PLS LCD, 16 mio. colors, glossy: yes, 90 Hz

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 42 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Fingerprint Sensor, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Wi-Fi Direct Samsung Smart Switch, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 168 x 77.8

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, charging up to 25W

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, AF, LED Flash, up to 10x digital zoom) + 2 MP depth sensor (f/2.4) + 2 MP macro camera (f/2.4); video recording up to 1080p@60fps
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0; video recording up to 1080p@60fps

Additional features

Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, quick start guide, warranty information, OneUI 6.1, 24 Months Warranty, Head SAR 0.58 W/kg, Body SAR 1.26 W/kg, fanless

Weight

194 g

Amazon

$128.87

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
68.5 %	v8	07 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy A05s SD 680, Adreno 610	194 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
80.7 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Motorola Moto G54 Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256	177 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
78.7 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Nokia G22 T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1	195 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.52"	1600x720
74.7 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	10 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy A04s Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1	195 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
80 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy A15 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	200 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.50"	2340x1080
80.2 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G SD 685, Adreno 610	188.5 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080

注：我们已经更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。这里.

机箱 - 采用现代设计的塑料机箱

三星Galaxy A05s 采用了与价格更高的Galaxy-A 相同的设计。机身背面整体平整，亚光表面处理使智能手机看起来更有质感。

与 Galaxy A04s相比，该设备略显狭窄。后盖上垂直排列的摄像头模块直接沿用了前代产品的设计。自拍摄像头再次位于水滴形凹槽中。

Galaxy A05s 重 194 克，比Galaxy A04s（195 克）轻了一点点。稳定性也有所改善，因为智能手机几乎无法被压入或扭转。不过，多一点的压力会传到显示屏上，并以轻微图像伪影的形式表现出来。

在测试时，Galaxy A05s 在三星网店只有黑色款式。其他网店还有银色或浅绿色可供选择。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy A05s Samsung Galaxy A04s Nokia G22 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Motorola Moto G54 Samsung Galaxy A15 DIN A6 ❌

功能 - 4 GB RAM 和高达 128 GB 内存

Galaxy A05s 在内存方面实现了飞跃。虽然 Galaxy A04s仅限于 3GB RAM 和 32GB 内存，而其后续产品则提供了至少两倍的存储空间。三星的智能手机有两种内存版本。

4 GB RAM、64 GB ROM：159 欧元
4GB RAM，128GB ROM：179 欧元

除了蓝牙版本更先进（5.1 而不是 5.0）外，Galaxy A05s 在功能方面与前代产品没有区别。除 USB-C 2.0 外，还有一个 NFC 模块、一个 3.5 毫米插孔连接和一个可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡以及最大 1 TB microSD 卡的卡槽。

microSD 读卡器

使用我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD 参考卡进行复制测试时，读卡器的运行速度相当快，但与 A04s 的性能不相上下。 Galaxy A04s.在连续传输速率方面，它要好得多。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	42.6 MB/s +17%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	40.7 MB/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	36.5 MB/s
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash (Angelbird V60)	36.2 MB/s -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	24.3 MB/s -33%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	19.6 MB/s -46%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.9 (25.6-49)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø26.5 (17.2-40)

Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.6 (35.4-85.7)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76 (18.4-82.5)

软件 - 升级至Android 14

三星为Galaxy A05s 提供了Android 13 和 6.1 版 OneUI 用户界面。该智能手机现已更新至Android 14。在 7 月初进行测试时，Android 安全补丁也更新到了 2024 年 6 月。

根据三星的说法，Galaxy A05s 每三个月应https://security.samsungmobile.com/workScope.smsb每三个月接受一次安全更新。制造商没有在其欧洲网站上透露具体时间。在其他地区，如印度或马来西亚另一方面，有传言称 A05s 的操作系统将升级 2 次，安全更新将持续 4 年，因此在马来西亚也可以这样认为。

三星在其智能手机上预装了许多第三方供应商提供的应用程序，如 Facebook、Spotify 或 TikTok，此外还有许多自己的应用程序。因此，64 GB 版本的存储空间很快就会用完，因为用户只能使用约 42 GB 的存储空间。

可持续性

据三星称，这款智能手机的包装是由 100% 的回收纸板制成的。为了进一步减少生态足迹，三星还在智能手机中使用回收材料。2021 年，在Galaxy 的设备中，已经有 90% 使用了旧渔网、消费后材料 (PCM) 或生物基塑料等替代材料。三星没有提供智能手机生产过程中二氧化碳排放量的精确信息。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 和 4G

通过 WiFi 5，三星Galaxy A05s 支持同价位产品中典型的 Wi-Fi 标准。在 WiFi 速度方面，它与其他竞争对手不相上下，与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时，传输速率非常稳定。

Galaxy A05s 通过 4G 接入移动互联网。虽然没有广泛的频率覆盖，但总共 10 个 4G 频段应该足够了，至少在欧盟地区是这样。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy A05s
iperf3 receive AXE11000	328 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	369 (min: 356) MBit/s ∼51%
Motorola Moto G54
iperf3 receive AXE11000	365 (min: 347) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	306 (min: 277) MBit/s ∼42%
Nokia G22
iperf3 receive AXE11000	315 (min: 226) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	362 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
iperf3 receive AXE11000	318 (min: 308) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	332 (min: 300) MBit/s ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A15
iperf3 receive AXE11000	285 (min: 259) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	364 (min: 352) MBit/s ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
iperf3 receive AXE11000	317 (min: 293) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	364 (min: 336) MBit/s ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (316-346)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø316 (293-339)

Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-384)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø364 (336-382)

Galaxy A05s 使用 GPS、Glonass、北斗、伽利略和 QZSS 卫星导航服务来确定当前位置。无论是在建筑物内还是在室外，经过短暂等待后，智能手机都能以最多 3 米的精度确定我们的位置。

Galaxy A05s 必须在短途自行车骑行中证明其实用性。它的对手是 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表。

三星智能手机基本上适合日常导航，但在某些方面缺乏准确性。在测试中，Galaxy A05s 经常在建筑密集区出现问题，然后把我们的位置从马路移到河边，或者认为我们的自行车已经冲向了下一栋建筑。与 Galaxy A04s应用程序中不显示视线方向。

电话功能和语音质量

Galaxy A05s 可容纳 2 张 SIM 卡，支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。

通过听筒拨打电话时，三星智能手机的语音质量非常稳定，但有时声音传输会有些尖锐。不过，即使在免提模式下，清晰度仍然很高。

照相机 - 日光下的实用图像

Galaxy A05s 的自拍摄像头分辨率为 1300 万像素，只要光线条件良好，就能拍出清晰的照片。在视频聊天时，其图像质量也不错。与主摄像头一样，视频录制速度可达 1080p，每秒 60 帧。

主摄像头配备了自动对焦功能，分辨率为 5000 万像素，并采用 4 合 1 像素分档技术拍摄 1250 万像素的照片。由于相机软件色彩鲜艳，图像看起来相当生动，但既不特别锐利，也不特别细腻，即使在光线条件良好的情况下也是如此。主摄像头拍摄的视频质量也差不多。在夜间或变焦拍摄时几乎无法使用。

后盖上有三个摄像头，但其中两个作用不大，主要用于展示。除了位于三镜头中间的 5000 万像素主摄像头外，还有一个微距摄像头和一个焦外传感器，这两个摄像头的分辨率都只有 200 万像素。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low-light

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A05s

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A05s

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A05s

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

在测试实验室中，主摄像头显示图像总是略微曝光过度，难以清晰显示精细的图像细节。在 1 勒克斯的残余光下，ColorChecker 色彩图和测试图在黑暗中消失。

配件和保修 - 24 个月保修，但不提供 Care+ 服务

除了智能手机之外，Galaxy A05s 的超薄包装中仅包含一根 USB-C 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一份快速入门指南。

Galaxy A05s 提供 24 个月的保修服务。Care+三星没有为这款智能手机提供。

输入设备和操作 - 90 赫兹屏幕和指纹传感器

得益于 90 Hz 的刷新率，三星Galaxy A05s 的操作相当流畅。不过，由于处理器性能并不高，操作过程中时不时会出现卡顿和小延迟。

指纹传感器也位于电源按钮上。即使在显示屏关闭的情况下，它也能识别手指，并非常快速、可靠地解锁智能手机。如果环境光线充足，用户还可以使用 2D 面部识别进行生物认证，效果与指纹传感器一样好。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 不带 PWM 的 PLS 面板

Galaxy A05s 采用了 PLS 面板，在技术上与经典的 IPS 面板几乎相同。与其前代产品，分辨率明显提高。从 1600 x 720 像素到 2400 x 1080 像素，显示效果更加清晰。显示屏不支持 HDR。

Galaxy A05s 的显示亮度也比Galaxy A04s 有所提高。以前它的亮度高达 427 cd/m²，而现在我们测得的最高亮度为 520 cd/m²。不过，这个不错的亮度值不会让任何竞争对手望尘莫及。比如小米Redmi Note 13 4G所示，在低于 200 欧元的价格范围内，亮度值几乎可以达到四位数。

PLS 面板不需要脉宽调制（PWM）。这使得Galaxy A05s 非常适合对 PWM 闪烁敏感的用户。


451 cd/m²	495 cd/m²	448 cd/m²
455 cd/m²	520 cd/m²	450 cd/m²
451 cd/m²	498 cd/m²	439 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 520 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 467.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 520 cd/m²
Contrast: 1444:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25

	Samsung Galaxy A05s PLS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.7", 90 Hz	Motorola Moto G54 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5", 120 Hz	Nokia G22 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5", 90 Hz	Samsung Galaxy A04s PLS, 1600x720, 6.5", 90 Hz	Samsung Galaxy A15 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5", 90 Hz	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7", 120 Hz
Screen		17%	17%	4%	51%	71%
Brightness middle	520	492 -5%	674 30%	426 -18%	731 41%	940 81%
Brightness	467	470 1%	641 37%	390 -16%	711 52%	922 97%
Brightness Distribution	84	90 7%	90 7%	84 0%	93 11%	96 14%
Black Level *	0.36	0.3 17%	0.43 -19%	0.33 8%
Contrast	1444	1640 14%	1567 9%	1291 -11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.25	3.9 26%	4.45 15%	4.39 16%	2.31 56%	1.2 77%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.48	6.26 40%	7.41 29%	7.97 24%	3.51 67%	2.28 78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.1	4.3 39%	5.1 28%	5.1 28%	1.7 76%	1.4 80%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.275 ^97%	2.072 ^106%	2.184 ^101%	2.091 ^105%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	8660 ^75%	7656 ^85%	7799 ^83%	7985 ^81%	6424 ^101%	6503 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

PLS 面板的对比度为 1444:1，显示内容相当生动，但亮度不太均匀（84%）。分光光度计和 Calman 分析软件的测量结果表明，PLS 面板在色彩和灰度表现方面也不尽如人意，会产生明显的蓝色偏差。不过，总体而言，偏差在合理范围之内。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.9 ms rise
22.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.4 ms rise
37.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Galaxy A05s 在户外表现出色。PLS 面板能迅速适应光线条件的变化，即使在阳光明媚的日子里，显示内容也清晰可见。不过，PLS 面板在阳光直射时会达到极限，因为此时的亮度几乎不足以补偿显示屏的强烈反射。在阴暗处的可读性没有问题。

PLS 面板能清晰显示内容，即使从非常平的角度观看也不会出现色彩失真。不过，如果不完全垂直于观看方向，它也会很快变暗。

性能 - 配备骁龙 680 4G 技术的 Galaxyy A05s

三星Galaxy A05s 采用骁龙 680 4GSoC，许多经济型智能手机也采用了该芯片。它的性能为Galaxy A05s 带来了稳定的速度。它显然可以击败诺基亚 G22和 Galaxy A04s在合成基准测试中。在性能方面，它接近于小米Redmi Note 13 4G的骁龙 685 4G.

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)	1491 Points +259%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	916 Points +121%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	728 Points +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	478 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (413 - 436, n=5)	422 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	415 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)	4177 Points +195%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	2315 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1942 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	1544 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1415 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (865 - 1450, n=5)	1218 Points -14%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)	1037 Points +169%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	697 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	552 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	437 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	386 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (323 - 386, n=15)	374 Points -3%
Nokia G22 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	310 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	176 Points -54%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)	3464 Points +109%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	1903 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1879 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	1775 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1659 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1287 - 1738, n=15)	1585 Points -4%
Nokia G22 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1318 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	1059 Points -36%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)	1307393 Points +312%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	391170 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	352825 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	317448 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (287727 - 317448, n=2)	302588 Points -5%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	13268 Points +55%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)	13179 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	9195 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	8538 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	7305 Points -14%
Nokia G22 Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	6637 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4535 - 8730, n=15)	6633 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	5796 Points -32%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)	920 Points +132%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	628 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	526 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	396 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (325 - 413, n=8)	374 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	369 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	274 Points -31%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)	6460 Points +164%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	3773 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3076 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	2728 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2444 - 2738, n=8)	2581 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2444 Points
Samsung Galaxy A04s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	1491 Points -39%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)	10308 Points +87%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	6911 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	6743 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	6320 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5521 - 5852, n=8)	5716 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	5521 Points
Samsung Galaxy A04s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	3248 Points -41%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy A04s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	11617 Points +324%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)	7016 Points +156%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	5004 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3636 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2742 - 3824, n=8)	3376 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	3285 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2742 Points
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)	17782 Points +734%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	4200 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2798 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	2331 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1994 - 2183, n=8)	2134 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2133 Points
Samsung Galaxy A04s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	1259 Points -41%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)	1574 Points +43%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	1394 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1306 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	1144 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1104 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (917 - 1199, n=8)	1077 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	747 Points -32%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)	17814 Points +324%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	6323 Points +51%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	6014 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	4615 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4150 - 4853, n=6)	4405 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4201 Points
Samsung Galaxy A04s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	2841 Points -32%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)	25319 Points +7989%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	920 Points +194%
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192	865 Points +176%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	382 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	313 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (264 - 348, n=3)	308 Points -2%

Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Average of class Smartphone (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)	824 Points +235%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	246 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G ()	246 Points 0%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)	746 Points
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)	647 Points
Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	Points

钛 Adreno 610负责图形计算。Galaxy A05s 在这方面的表现相当不错，但与合成基准测试一样，它的成绩只能排在中下游。GPU 性能足以满足简单的图形计算。然而，游戏并不是这款智能手机的专长，因为在 GFXBench 中，即使图形稍微复杂一些，帧率也低于每秒 30 帧。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	326 Points +161%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	135 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	125 Points
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	112 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	332 Points +168%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	139 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	137 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	124 Points
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	114 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1094 Points +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	634 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	585 Points
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	509 Points -13%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	413 Points -29%
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1195 Points +99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	645 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	602 Points
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	501 Points -17%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	408 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	3524 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3329 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2739 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2487 Points
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2150 Points -14%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2411 Points +82%
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	2397 Points +81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1427 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1324 Points
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	791 Points -40%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	2580 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2568 Points +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1597 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1478 Points
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	920 Points -38%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	69 fps +92%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	56 fps +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	36 fps
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps -6%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps -8%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	74 fps +76%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	45 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	42 fps
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps -43%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -48%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	57 fps +185%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps +80%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	28 fps +40%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	62 fps +182%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps -27%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	33 fps +136%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps +36%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	35 fps +133%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.4 fps -37%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.7 fps -42%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	18 fps +157%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps +43%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.3 fps +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.7 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	19 fps +135%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.8 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6.1 fps -25%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.2 fps -36%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	11 fps +120%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.9 fps +78%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6.9 fps +38%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.4 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.5 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	7.1 fps +115%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.6 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2.2 fps -33%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2 fps -39%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	19 fps +124%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +29%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10 fps +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.5 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.5 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	20 fps +104%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6.1 fps -38%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.5 fps -44%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	3 fps +114%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.5 fps +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1.5 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	0.96 fps -31%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	0.85 fps -39%

Galaxy A05s 可快速加载网站，但有时需要一段时间才能完全加载所有内容。但总的来说，浏览速度还是比较快的。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +97%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)	85.936 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)	74.154 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A05s (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	63.1 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)	62.375 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (35.7 - 63.1, n=8)	45.8 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chrome 106)	23.039 Points -63%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +120%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)	76.5 runs/min +17%
Samsung Galaxy A05s (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	65.3 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)	60.4 runs/min -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)	52.4 runs/min -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (32.7 - 65.3, n=8)	43.4 runs/min -34%
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chome 106)	15.8 runs/min -76%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)	117.1 Points +77%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)	97 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)	78 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A05s (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	66 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (41 - 66, n=5)	51 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)	49 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chrome 106)	25 Points -62%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +60%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)	120 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)	95 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A05s (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	94 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (58 - 94, n=7)	71.6 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chrome 106)	39 Points -59%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +148%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)	28919 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)	21890 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)	15900 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A05s (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	15553 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6358 - 15553, n=12)	11775 Points -24%
Nokia G22 (Chrome 112)	10858 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chrome 106)	5894 Points -62%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chrome 106)	8423 ms * -242%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2461 - 3461, n=7)	3029 ms * -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)	2534.6 ms * -3%
Samsung Galaxy A05s (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	2461.1 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)	2009.6 ms * +18%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +38%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)	1399.8 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

三星智能手机依赖于速度较慢的 eMMC 闪存。在实际使用中，应用程序启动或应用程序加载内容有时需要等待更长的时间。正如所有配备 UFS 内存的竞争产品所显示的那样，eMMC 内存已经跟不上时代的步伐，即使对于廉价智能手机来说也是如此。

	Samsung Galaxy A05s	Motorola Moto G54	Nokia G22	Samsung Galaxy A04s	Samsung Galaxy A15	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		258%	113%	-32%	186%	195%	-22%	487%
Sequential Read 256KB	441.25	983.01 123%	881 100%	302.4 -31%	967.8 119%	909.8 106%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=204) -38%	1882 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years) 327%
Sequential Write 256KB	114.19	817.55 616%	367 221%	83.3 -27%	488.5 328%	606.3 431%	176.6 ?(40 - 274, n=204) 55%	1467 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years) 1185%
Random Read 4KB	102.99	232.74 126%	131 27%	62.7 -39%	233.2 126%	177.1 72%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=204) -42%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years) 170%
Random Write 4KB	84.71	224.58 165%	172 103%	58.9 -30%	229.6 171%	228 169%	32.2 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=204) -62%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years) 266%

游戏 - 流畅的游戏绝对是可能的

通过测试工具Gamebench来测试三星Galaxy A05s 的游戏运行能力。虽然这不是一款游戏手机，但只要游戏要求不高，它肯定适用于介于两者之间的游戏。

战术射击游戏《PUBG Mobile》一直都很容易上手，而且在平衡设置下（无法选择更高的图形级别）几乎能以每秒 30 帧的速度稳定运行。另一方面，要求较高的《源氏冲击》并不好玩。即使在最低图形级别下，帧数也会急剧下降，而更高的预设值只会让游戏运行得很不流畅。

Samsung Galaxy A05s; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø27.9 (5-42)

Samsung Galaxy A05s; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø13.1 (2-20)

Samsung Galaxy A05s; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.2.0: Ø39.5 (34-41)

Samsung Galaxy A05s; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 3.2.0: Ø29.5 (25-31)

排放 - 高温下不节流

温度

经过一个小时的烧机基准压力测试后，我们测得Galaxy A05 的表面温度高达 52 °C。如果长时间用力按压智能手机，握在手中会感到不舒服。

尽管外部温度偶尔会达到烧烤派对的温度，但内部却依然轻松自如。Galaxy A05s 可以高效地散发运行过程中产生的热量，即使在持续的压力下也几乎不会降低性能。

Max. Load

Idle


48.1 °C	38.2 °C	37.4 °C
51.2 °C	39.7 °C	38.2 °C
51.3 °C	39.9 °C	38.4 °C

Maximum: 51.3 °C
Average: 42.5 °C


34.1 °C	40.3 °C	49.3 °C
36.9 °C	42.7 °C	41.7 °C
36.2 °C	44.7 °C	52 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 42 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.5 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.3 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	98.4 %
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	97.7 % -1%
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	96.8 % -2%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	98.9 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.7 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	97 % -2%
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	95.6 % -3%

Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.746 (0.74-0.749)

Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.838 (0.828-0.854)

Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.05 (1.992-2.08)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.814 (0.81-0.82)

Samsung Galaxy A05s Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.59 (3.55-3.61)

Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.5 (2.44-2.52)

Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.07 (3.01-3.09)

Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.47 (7.42-7.49)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.91 (3.89-3.93)

发言人

Galaxy A05s 的单声道扬声器位于 USB-C 端口旁边，听起来高音非常压抑，缺乏低音，但对于这个价位的产品来说还算可以。此外，即使在最大音量下也不会失真。

外接音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙 5.1 连接到智能手机。Galaxy A05s 只支持 SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和三星内部的可扩展编解码器（SSC）等几种蓝牙编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy A05s audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 充电功率高达 25 瓦

耗电量

三星智能手机的 5000 毫安时电池充电功率可达 25 瓦，与前代产品的最大 10 瓦相比有了显著提高。前身是可能的。在测试中，一个充电周期需要 2:38 小时。31 分钟后电池电量为 50%，1:36 小时后达到 80%。

Galaxy A05s 运行节俭，但在负载情况下所需功率略高于对比设备。不过，这主要是由于我们在压力测试中使用了烧毁基准。与较早的稳定性测试相比，它的要求要高得多，这也反映在测试设备较高的消耗值上。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.1 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Load	4.1 / 6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy A05s 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G54 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A04s 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A15 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		12%	11%	13%	-2%	-25%	-23%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	0.9 18%	1.1 -0%	1.1 -0%	1.1 -0%	1.027 ?(0.63 - 1.5, n=7) 7%	0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Average *	1.3	1.2 8%	1.3 -0%	1.2 8%	1.3 -0%	1.983 ?(1.1 - 4.25, n=7) -53%	1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years) -11%
Idle Maximum *	1.6	1.5 6%	1.6 -0%	1.5 6%	1.5 6%	2.33 ?(1.5 - 4.34, n=7) -46%	1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years) -0%
Load Average *	4.1	3.3 20%	2.7 34%	2.9 29%	3.6 12%	4.8 ?(2.6 - 10.2, n=7) -17%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years) -60%
Load Maximum *	6	5.6 7%	4.7 22%	4.8 20%	7.8 -30%	6.82 ?(3.85 - 10.7, n=7) -14%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years) -65%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.8 (1.053-6)

Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.82 (1.125-4.84)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.73 (1.11-7.79)

Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.171 (1.085-1.494)

Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.254 (1.128-1.485)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.326 (1.144-3.09)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.71 (2.29-4.16)

Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.55 (2.16-2.95)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.36 (3.15-4.73)

Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.171 (1.085-1.494)

Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.254 (1.128-1.485)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.326 (1.144-3.09)

电池寿命

Galaxy A05s 的 5000 毫安时电池具有良好的续航时间。它可以进行约 15 小时的模拟网上冲浪和近 16 小时的连续视频播放。不过，该测试机型的电池续航时间还达不到 Galaxy A04s的电池续航时间，在一定程度上也落后于其他竞争对手。

不过，Galaxy A05s 的电量足以满足一天的高强度使用。如果您不是一直使用智能手机，您应该可以轻松地使用两天或更长时间才需要充电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		36h 30min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 44min

	Samsung Galaxy A05s 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G54 5000 mAh	Nokia G22 5050 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A04s 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A15 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		18%	16%	15%	12%	3%
Reader / Idle	2190	3481 59%		2253 3%	1622 -26%	1509 -31%
H.264	957	1041 9%		1062 11%	1446 51%	1358 42%
WiFi v1.3	905	875 -3%	1052 16%	977 8%	885 -2%	742 -18%
Load	284	301 6%		396 39%	358 26%	334 18%

Pros

+ 90 Hz 屏幕，无 PWM

+ NFC

+ 双卡双待 + microSD

+ 稳定快速的 WiFi 5

+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 没有指南针

- 只有几个 4G 频率

- 可用内存少（64GB 版本）

- 更新时间短

- eMMC 闪存速度慢

判决

三星Galaxy A05s 是一款非常经济实惠的智能手机，适合日常使用。它拥有 90 Hz 屏幕、NFC、快速 WiFi 5 和良好的电池续航能力等强大功能。与 Galaxy A04s，它的内存至少是 A04s 的两倍，分辨率为全高清，显示屏的亮度也更高。

三星Galaxy A05s 是一款价位在 200 欧元以内的入门级智能手机，但与前代产品一样，它在竞争中并不突出。

你不应该对Galaxy A05s 的摄像头和 GPS 模块抱有太高期望。与 5G 相比，它只有数量相对可控的 4G 频率，而且 eMMC 闪存速度较慢，等待时间不可避免。64 GB 版本还得好好利用存储空间。而且操作系统升级不超过 2 次，其中一次已经推出。

从价格上看，三星Galaxy A05s 定位稳固，但无法真正在竞争中脱颖而出。如果你看看小米Redmi Note 13 4G为例，你不仅能获得更高的性能，还能获得 AMOLED 面板和更快的 UFS 2.2 内存。三星三星Galaxy A15在价格上与Galaxy A05s 几乎没有差别，因此也是一个不错的选择。

价格和供应情况

三星Galaxy A05s 可在包括亚马逊在内的普通零售商处广泛购买。

注：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。这里可在此处查阅。

Samsung Galaxy A05s - 07/10/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

80%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

39 / 69 → 56%

Weight

89%

Battery

90%

Display

71%

Games Performance

3 / 55 → 5%

Application Performance

46 / 85 → 54%

AI Performance

15%

Temperature

82%

Noise

100%

Audio

68 / 90 → 76%

Camera

53%

Average

62%

69%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
95.8%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
70%

Total Sustainability Score: 59.3%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 468850 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A05s 评测--配备 90 赫兹屏幕的廉价智能手机

Manuel Masiero, 2024-07-14 (Update: 2024-08-15)

三星Galaxy A05s 评测--配备 90 赫兹屏幕的廉价智能手机

船上有重要的东西吗？

潜在的竞争对手比较

机箱 - 采用现代设计的塑料机箱

尺寸比较

功能 - 4 GB RAM 和高达 128 GB 内存

microSD 读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件 - 升级至Android 14

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 和 4G

电话功能和语音质量

照相机 - 日光下的实用图像

配件和保修 - 24 个月保修，但不提供 Care+ 服务

输入设备和操作 - 90 赫兹屏幕和指纹传感器

显示屏 - 不带 PWM 的 PLS 面板

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备骁龙 680 4G 技术的 Galaxyy A05s

游戏 - 流畅的游戏绝对是可能的

排放 - 高温下不节流

温度

3DMark Steel Nomad

发言人

Samsung Galaxy A05s audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 充电功率高达 25 瓦

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

判决

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison