Notebookcheck Logo

笔记本电脑评论中的Alienware m17 R5。全AMD游戏机,潜力巨大,但驱动问题。

AMD的母舰还没有起飞。

在新的m17 R5中,戴尔完全押注于AMD,包括处理器(Ryzen 9 6900HX)和显卡(Radeon RX 6850M XT)。我们看看这些组件在17英寸的游戏机中是否能很好地配合,以及AMD的组合是否能抵挡住英特尔/英伟达的竞争对手。
AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook Radeon Ryzen (Zen) Zen

在2021年,我们回顾了前辈 彗星的CPU和RTX3080的Alienware m17 R4与其彗星湖CPU和RTX 3080。在此过程中,我们发现了一些弱点,这些弱点在评测标题中得到了很好的反映("在大气中被烧毁")。我们现在有了m17 R5,但这次是完整的AMD硬件,在测试实验室里,我们自然对后继者是否最终控制住了前辈的温度问题感兴趣。

我们的全AMD模型配备了大量的Ryzen 9 6900HX,一个Radeon RX 6850M XT和32GB的内存,价格同样为2550美元。对于这个价格,你当然可以期待各种优化。当然,我们也对AMD CPU和AMD GPU的组合与各种英特尔/英伟达组合的表现感兴趣。

我们将R5与它的前辈R4进行比较,但也与类似装备的竞争对手如华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SE竞争对手,如华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SE,宏碁Predator Helios 300。 Acer Predator Helios 300笔记本电脑,以及 申克XMG Neo 17 M22技嘉Aorus 17X XES.

m17 R5 (m17 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT - 12 GB VRAM, Core: 2419 MHz, RAM: 2250 MHz
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SK Hynix DDR5-4800
Display
17.00 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, AMD FreeSync, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
SSSTC CA6-8D1024, 1024 GB 
, 960 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Headset
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 26.7 x 397.3 x 298.71
Battery
97 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo Speakers 2x 2,5 W, Keyboard: Alienware RGB AlienFX per key mSeries, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty, Premium Support and Onsite Service
Weight
3.384 kg, Power Supply: 994 g
Price
3599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.1 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
3.4 kg26.7 mm17.00"3840x2160
85.3 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2021
Alienware m17 R4
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3 kg22 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.9 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.9 kg28.3 mm17.30"2560x1440
86.5 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3 kg27.65 mm17.30"2560x1440
87.6 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.8 kg27 mm17.00"2560x1600
83.7 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.7 kg30 mm17.30"1920x1080

外壳--m17 R5的革新设计

机箱已经进行了大量的改造,即使差别只是从配色和底板上第一眼就能看出来。在白色的R4之后,新的m17现在再次采用了深灰色的金属机身,底板上的格栅现在是蜂窝状而不是条纹状。总的来说,对于Alienware来说,这个设计几乎是朴素的,至少在关闭时是这样。如果你打开它,各种LED灯会提醒你,你面前有一台Alien游戏笔记本。

另一方面,内部布局也是新的,键盘不再有数字键盘,方向键不再向下突出,端口也有变化等等。

m17 R4
m17 R4
m17 R5
m17 R5

和以前一样,外壳是由坚固的金属制成的,而显示屏的边缘是由塑料制成的。底板也是由塑料制成,但也经过了橡胶处理,作为补充。

总的来说,这台笔记本电脑的抗扭性很强,只有在受到扭力时才会出现轻微裂纹。盖子也异常稳定,整体制造质量处于高水平。

众所周知,Alienware笔记本电脑由于其庞大的冷却系统而显得相当庞大,尽管竞争对手如 Acer Predator同时也在这方面 "效仿"。

然而,引人注目的是,m17 R5的重量增加了很多。这款游戏机现在比前代产品整整重了400克,使其成为比较领域中最重的设备。前代产品也更薄,即使许多竞争对手更厚。

总的来说,m17非常大,而且最重要的是,在同类产品中很重。

尺寸比较

398 mm 258 mm 30 mm 2.7 kg399.3 mm 295.5 mm 27.65 mm 3 kg397.3 mm 298.71 mm 26.7 mm 3.4 kg395 mm 282 mm 28.3 mm 2.9 kg399.8 mm 294.3 mm 22 mm 3 kg381.7 mm 272.8 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - m17 R5的端口较少

端口的种类绝不是以积极的方式发展;R4的各种端口在R5中被简单地省略了。这些包括用于外部显卡的Alienwareport、microSD读卡器和专用DisplayPort。戴尔只是将后者 "挤 "进一个USB-C端口的功能中。而这个端口,在今年的AMD版本中还不支持Thunderbolt或USB 4。

左侧没有USB端口,而且你必须将所有USB设备连接到鼠标一侧,这一事实在我们的审查中很快被证明是令人讨厌的。否则,大部分的端口都在后面,它们之间有足够的空间。

右:2个USB-A 3.0
右:2个USB-A 3.0
左边:RJ45 LAN,耳机
左边:RJ45 LAN,耳机
后部。USB-C 3.2 Gen2,带PowerShare的USB-A 3.0,HDMI 2.1,电源接口
后部。USB-C 3.2 Gen2,带PowerShare的USB-A 3.0,HDMI 2.1,电源接口

沟通

戴尔使用了联发科的MT7921,而不是这个级别典型的英特尔AX或杀手无线模块。它的可能性被m17用尽了,但一般来说是有限的。竞争对手的笔记本电脑大多更快。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)
1383 MBit/s +43%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
MediaTek MT7921
968 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
MediaTek RZ608
967 (949min - 978max) MBit/s 0%
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (104.2 - 968, n=18)
778 MBit/s -20%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)
1235 MBit/s +26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
MediaTek MT7921
981 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
MediaTek RZ608
936 (898min - 971max) MBit/s -5%
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (47.8 - 985, n=18)
795 MBit/s -19%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1648 (1133min - 1711max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1645 (1589min - 1741max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=72, last 2 years)
1425 MBit/s
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1350 (1269min - 1405max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (829 - 1116, n=5)
938 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1755 (1679min - 1765max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1732 (1685min - 1744max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=72, last 2 years)
1482 MBit/s
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1416 (680min - 1453max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (609 - 1245, n=5)
894 MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø976 (930-1012)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø968 (947-983)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (1589-1741)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1341 (1269-1405)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1732 (1685-1744)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1393 (680-1453)

网络摄像头

这不是由于隐私设置的原因。
这不是由于隐私设置的原因。

虽然许多竞争对手都安装了全高清网络摄像头,但m17的用户不得不使用720p的摄像头。

在我们的评测模型中,这并不能正常工作。当我们启动它时,我们得到的信息是没有找到网络摄像头,我们毫无意义地点击,然后突然出现一个视频图像,然后错误信息再次弹出,随后是另一个图像。

另一方面,网络摄像头在另一个m17-R5型号上工作,它目前正与我们的YouTuber Alex一起享受电影生涯。我们怀疑我们的评测机型的硬件有什么地方松动了。至少我们足够幸运,能够拍下我们的两张测试照片。

ColorChecker
16.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
22 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
19 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
24 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT): 17.95 ∆E min: 3.43 - max: 27.69 ∆E

安全问题

游戏笔记本通常在安全功能上略显不足,Alienware也是如此。指纹传感器不见了,你在这里也找不到Kensington插槽。720p的摄像头能够在Windows Hello中进行红外面部识别。

配件和保修

戴尔在盒子里没有包装任何附件。

在德国的保修期只有12个月。这可能会因您所在的地区而有所不同,所以感兴趣的买家在购买前应仔细检查。

维护

2个螺丝要长得多。
2个螺丝要长得多。

要松开底部,需要拧开8个十字头的螺丝。其中有两颗长得多,所以你应该记住哪颗螺丝进入哪条线。

一旦拧开,底部几乎不需要工具就可以撬开。然后你就可以接触到风扇、两个内存插槽、两个M.2 SSD插槽、电池和可更换的Wifi模块。

m17 R5内部
m17 R5内部
底板上的冷却垫
底板上的冷却垫
M.2 SSD和可更换的Wifi模块
M.2 SSD和可更换的Wifi模块
2个RAM插槽
2个RAM插槽

输入设备 - 17英寸,没有数字键盘

键盘

键盘布局也进行了改造。尽管是17英寸大小,但数字键盘已经被取消,但方向键现在是正常大小,布局看起来非常整齐。回车键现在也是正常大小,但换档键则有点短。

旧的布局(R3,R4)。
旧的布局(R3,R4)。
没有数字键盘的新布局 (R5)
没有数字键盘的新布局 (R5)

按键本身的行程适中,反馈清晰可辨。总体而言,打字体验非常好,打字噪音适中。

如今,背光是不可缺少的,而且在游戏笔记本中必须是彩色的。于是,m17允许各种LED噱头的出现。除了RGB-per-key效果外,你还可以配置正面和背面的Alien标识以及背面的LED条。

调整照明
调整照明
冷却系统上的LED条
冷却系统上的LED条

触摸板

触摸板
触摸板

大小适中(11.5 x 8厘米)的触摸板具有良好的滑行性能;只有在非常缓慢的运动中才会有轻微的动摇。

集成的点击按钮有一个很好的压力点,并提供清晰的反馈。然而,在我们的评测模型中,点击偶尔会 "卡住",即一个按钮在被点击后不会再弹起来。点击的噪音是中等的。

显示器--Alienware的明亮4K面板

哑光覆盖造成的颗粒状子像素
哑光覆盖造成的颗粒状子像素
右下角的屏幕出血量极少
右下角的屏幕出血量极少

戴尔安装了一块来自友达光电的哑光UHD IPS面板(3840 x 2160像素),刷新率为120赫兹。

有许多备选方案,首先是三个全高清显示器,它们主要在刷新率上有所不同(165、360、480赫兹!),但也在支持FreeSync与G-Sync方面有所不同。然后是一个具有165赫兹的QHD显示器(2,560 x 1,440)。

我们的测量结果与广告中的3毫秒响应时间有些差距;我们的测量结果在11.6至16.4毫秒之间。屏幕出血量很小,特别是在右下角的边缘。没有使用PWM。

在同类比较中,近450尼特的亮度是非常好的,照明也很好。另一方面,黑色水平急剧下降,这意味着对比度受到一定程度的影响。

449
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics AUODBA3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 486 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 449 cd/m² Minimum: 21.228 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 481 cd/m²
Contrast: 880:1 (Black: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.74
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17"
Alienware m17 R4
AU Optronics AUOEC91, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
BOE0A1A, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
Aorus 17X XES
Sharp SHP1563, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
-16%
-1%
-1%
-17%
-16%
Display P3 Coverage
97.2
69.8
-28%
97.1
0%
96.8
0%
69
-29%
70.1
-28%
sRGB Coverage
99.6
99.7
0%
99.9
0%
99.9
0%
99.8
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
88.4
71.6
-19%
84.8
-4%
84.8
-4%
69.6
-21%
71.9
-19%
Response Times
21%
39%
2%
41%
65%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.4 ?(7.8, 8.6)
13.2 ?(6.4, 6.8)
20%
5.7 ?(2.7, 3)
65%
16.4 ?(7.8, 8.6)
-0%
10.8 ?(5.1, 5.7)
34%
3.4 ?(1.4, 2)
79%
Response Time Black / White *
11.6 ?(6.2, 5.4)
9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4)
21%
10.1 ?(5, 5.1)
13%
11.2 ?(5.8, 5.4)
3%
6.1 ?(2.5, 3.6)
47%
5.8 ?(2.5, 3.3)
50%
PWM Frequency
Screen
41%
28%
17%
33%
1%
Brightness middle
484
305
-37%
320
-34%
366
-24%
415
-14%
278
-43%
Brightness
449
301
-33%
303
-33%
340
-24%
399
-11%
273
-39%
Brightness Distribution
87
93
7%
87
0%
85
-2%
90
3%
79
-9%
Black Level *
0.55
0.19
65%
0.3
45%
0.31
44%
0.43
22%
0.26
53%
Contrast
880
1605
82%
1067
21%
1181
34%
965
10%
1069
21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.8
1.31
73%
1.1
77%
3.56
26%
1.44
70%
3.96
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.48
2.32
69%
2.7
64%
5.66
24%
2.33
69%
10.78
-44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.74
0.91
81%
3.31
30%
0.89
81%
1.07
77%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.5
2.3
58%
1.1
80%
2.84
48%
1.8
67%
6.8
-24%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.281 96%
2.13 103%
2.29 96%
2.132 103%
2.224 99%
CCT
6148 106%
6449 101%
6599 98%
6835 95%
6327 103%
7651 85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
72
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
Total Average (Program / Settings)
15% / 26%
22% / 23%
6% / 11%
19% / 23%
17% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Alienware提供了体面的色彩空间覆盖:sRGB完全再现,DisplayP3为97%,AdobeRGB为88%。这使得该屏幕适用于专业图像和视频编辑。

sRGB
sRGB
显示P3
显示P3
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB

尽管色彩空间覆盖良好,但DeltaE值并不特别低。接近5的DeltaE值对颜色和灰度来说都有点过高。

我们的手动校准使灰度的DeltaE值降至0.46,色彩的偏差降至3.06。该配置文件可以在上面下载。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检测器
颜色检测器
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度校验
饱和度校验
校准的ColorChecker
校准的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.2 ms rise
↘ 5.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.8 ms rise
↘ 8.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在户外,450尼特和哑光表面有助于减少大多数反射。然而,弱对比度禁止在阳光直射下使用。

阴天在户外。
阴天在户外。
在户外的陡峭的观察角度。
在户外的陡峭的观察角度。

视角的稳定性是可以接受的,但与IPS标准相比并不出色。当从极端角度观看时,会失去相当数量的亮度。

业绩 - 驱动因素阻碍了真正的潜力

无论是AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX其八个核心和AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT以及慷慨的32GB内存都将该设备归入高性能玩家类别。这意味着该设备应该能够在集成显示器上顺利运行所有当前游戏,即使不总是以原生4K分辨率运行。

另外,你可以在配置器中选择小一号的Ryzen 7 6800H和一个 Radeon RX 6700M。内存可以在8和64GB之间变化。

测试条件

不幸的是,戴尔总是在Alienware笔记本电脑上预装两个制造商的应用程序,即 "我的Alienware "和 "Alienware指挥中心"。前者主要用于支持,而后者则是控制中心。在指挥中心,你可以设置灯光和性能模式,总共有五种。此外,某些数值还可以手动超频。

预配置的系统不能打开Radeon软件。
预配置的系统不能打开Radeon软件。
可怕的蓝屏。
可怕的蓝屏。
在GPU切换过程中系统挂起。
在GPU切换过程中系统挂起。

我们为基准测试选择了性能 模式。只有全速 模式能挤出更多的性能,但这里的风扇总是最大的。

在测试过程中,我们反复遇到了全AMD配置的问题。起初,我们无法访问戴尔预配置系统中的Radeon软件。

安装最新的驱动程序导致了相当大的稳定性问题,于是我们根据戴尔的建议安装了一个旧的、稳定的驱动程序。然而,在我们的评测模型上出现了一次蓝屏,在标准游戏基准测试中,M17完全崩溃。在睡眠模式下也出现了同样的情况。而这是一台替换的设备!

此外,AMD的自动图形切换似乎并不完美。与Nvidia的Optimus不同,AMD的SmartAccess在集成GPU和专用GPU之间切换时总是导致系统挂起几秒钟,这真的很烦人。希望很快会出现更多稳定的驱动解决方案来解决这个问题。

我的Alienware
我的Alienware
系统启动后,指挥中心经常挂起。
系统启动后,指挥中心经常挂起。
性能简介
性能简介

处理器

TDP CB-15回路。性能模式
TDP CB-15回路。性能模式
TDP CB-15回路。平衡模式
TDP CB-15回路。平衡模式
TDP CB-15回路。全速模式
TDP CB-15回路。全速模式
在CB15上运行100°C
在CB15上运行100°C
电池模式下30W
电池模式下30W

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX有8个Zen3+核心,时钟频率从3.3到4.9GHz,可以同时处理16个线程。

在我们的CPU测试中,AMD处理器的表现基本符合预期。与采用相同CPU的所有测试笔记本电脑的平均值相比,它始终保持在1-2%的偏差范围内。

Cinebench R15循环显示,性能非常稳定。然而,它没有达到英特尔 i9-12900HX对应的处理器,以及 i7-12700H中的 Acer Predator Helios 300也更快。

控制中心的性能 模式几乎没有任何区别。无论是平衡性能 还是全速,在所有CB-15的运行中,TDP几乎都是一样的。

根据HWinfo的数据,在Cinebench运行期间,CPU几乎一直达到100℃,这是非常高的。

在远离电源插座的地方,CPU性能在Cinebench R15中下降了约38%。这里的TDP最高只有32W。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2287 (2247.19-2314.81)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2840 (2810.77-2881.01)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)
Aorus 17X XES Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø2729 (2696.14-2830.06)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
85.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
84 pt
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
80.5 pt
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
69.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
65.5 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64.3 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
63.3 pt
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
53.6 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)
21651 Points +56%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
19965 Points +44%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
18337 Points +32%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
17133 Points +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14152 Points +2%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
13872 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (9709 - 15100, n=19)
13307 Points -4%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
11641 Points -16%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1928 Points +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
1903 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)
1877 Points +21%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1750 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1516 - 1616, n=19)
1565 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1557 Points 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1554 Points
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1305 Points -16%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points +55%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
7511 Points +42%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
7037 Points +33%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5846 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5549 Points +5%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5306 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (3742 - 5813, n=19)
5162 Points -3%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
4456 Points -16%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
741 Points +21%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
740 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points +18%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
697 Points +14%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
612 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (595 - 631, n=19)
610 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
605 Points -1%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
506 Points -17%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
3101 (2605.18min - 3101.02max) Points +34%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2886 Points +25%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
2830 (2696.14min - 2830.06max) Points +22%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2315 (2247.19min - 2314.81max) Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2296 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1588 - 2411, n=19)
2163 Points -7%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1853 (1809.95min - 1853.31max) Points -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
276 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
274 Points +10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
254 Points +2%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
250 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (241 - 261, n=19)
250 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
248 Points -1%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
209 Points -16%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
247 Seconds * -12%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (212 - 357, n=21)
239 Seconds * -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
221 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
216 Seconds * +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
213 Seconds * +4%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
201 Seconds * +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
175 Seconds * +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * +22%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)
84653 MIPS +37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
77003 MIPS +24%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
69778 MIPS +13%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
67427 MIPS +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64439 MIPS +4%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
61988 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (49526 - 65336, n=20)
60091 MIPS -3%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
49275 MIPS -21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6343 MIPS +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)
6281 MIPS +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
6255 MIPS +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5872 MIPS +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5090 - 6070, n=20)
5799 MIPS +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5760 MIPS 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5734 MIPS
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5463 MIPS -5%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
15144 Points +51%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
15116 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)
14891 Points +49%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
13414 Points +34%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10126 Points +1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10021 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (8313 - 10490, n=21)
9642 Points -4%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8135 Points -19%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1902 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)
1882 Points +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
1868 Points +19%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1723 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1590 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1523 - 1652, n=21)
1589 Points +1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1575 Points
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1351 Points -14%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
22.5 fps +34%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
19.6 fps +17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
17.5 fps +4%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
16.8 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (12.6 - 18.7, n=20)
16.7 fps -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.5 fps -2%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
14.3 fps -15%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
95.3 s * -66%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
57.3 s *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
56 s * +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (44.8 - 81.7, n=20)
53.1 s * +7%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
51.5 s * +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)
47.6 s * +17%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
37.7 s * +34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
34.7 s * +39%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.574 sec * -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.486 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (0.4627 - 0.4974, n=20)
0.483 sec * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4808 sec * +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4556 sec * +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)
0.4402 sec * +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
0.4251 sec * +13%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4159 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2315 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
204 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
250 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5306 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
612 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1554 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13872 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
95.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
87.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
80.5 pt
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
79.6 pt
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
77.7 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
77.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
77.2 pt
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
62.9 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)
21640 KRay/s +34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
17542 KRay/s +8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
17329 KRay/s +7%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
16202 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
16115 KRay/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (10950 - 17963, n=20)
15327 KRay/s -5%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15255 KRay/s -6%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
14726 KRay/s -9%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)
106090 Points +1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
104841 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98800 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (71414 - 110797, n=20)
96546 Points -8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90760 Points -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86936 Points -17%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
78356 Points -25%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
72636 Points -31%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)
4852 MB/s +40%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4179 MB/s +21%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4002 MB/s +16%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3562 MB/s +3%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3559 MB/s +3%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
3457 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3422 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (2471 - 3804, n=20)
3301 MB/s -5%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)
116237 Points +11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
105169 Points
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104457 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104422 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102178 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
102167 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (84185 - 107544, n=20)
100656 Points -4%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
92961 Points -12%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)
13175 Points +2%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
12918 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12783 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (10970 - 13205, n=20)
12630 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
11502 Points -11%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
10475 Points -19%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
10333 Points -20%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9939 Points -23%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
57695 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
54060 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)
53471 Points -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (39164 - 61370, n=20)
52842 Points -8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
44760 Points -22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42613 Points -26%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39016 Points -32%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
36621 Points -37%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
167077 MB/s +204%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
135833 MB/s +147%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
134645 MB/s +145%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (54613 - 142360, n=20)
115891 MB/s +111%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)
109176 MB/s +99%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
81465 MB/s +48%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
54897 MB/s
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
39087 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)
1349 MB/s +58%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1205 MB/s +41%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1159 MB/s +36%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
990 MB/s +16%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
854 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
845 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (578 - 911, n=20)
803 MB/s -6%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
767 MB/s -10%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)
11654 KRay/s +33%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9589 KRay/s +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9507 KRay/s +8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
8777 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8529 KRay/s -3%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8518 KRay/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5798 - 9540, n=20)
8175 KRay/s -7%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
7861 KRay/s -10%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42438 MPixel/s +40%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40386 MPixel/s +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)
39919 MPixel/s +32%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
38193 MPixel/s +26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
30343 MPixel/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
30226 MPixel/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (26873 - 30604, n=20)
29389 MPixel/s -3%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
21176 MPixel/s -30%

系统性能

PCMark 10的性能也几乎与预期完全一致。在 "生产力 "部分,AMD显卡的表现通常比配备Nvidia GPU的笔记本电脑差,但总体而言,m17 R5在其竞争对手之间处于中间位置。

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7899 Points +8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7899 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (7292 - 7377, n=2)
7335 Points +1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7292 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7208 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6966 Points -4%
Alienware m17 R4
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, 2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
6684 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)
10836 Points +6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10679 Points +4%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10589 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (10250 - 10521, n=2)
10386 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10306 Points +1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10250 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9740 Points -5%
Alienware m17 R4
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, 2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
9529 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10237 Points +13%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9984 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)
9878 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9856 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9564 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (9090 - 9097, n=2)
9094 Points 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9090 Points
Alienware m17 R4
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, 2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
8798 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
12546 Points +11%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
12342 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)
12030 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (11296 - 11385, n=2)
11341 Points 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11296 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10003 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9848 Points -13%
Alienware m17 R4
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, 2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
9666 Points -14%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2155 Points +35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2112 Points +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)
1899 Points +19%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1879 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1699 Points +6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1597 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (1596 - 1597, n=2)
1597 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2030 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1966 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)
1801 Points +15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1767 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1646 Points +5%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1565 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (1551 - 1565, n=2)
1558 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2336 Points +34%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2304 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)
2083 Points +20%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2057 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1867 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (1738 - 1754, n=2)
1746 Points 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1738 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2113 Points +61%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1936 Points +47%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1724 Points +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)
1699 Points +29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1405 Points +7%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1315 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (1310 - 1315, n=2)
1313 Points 0%
PCMark 10 Score
7292 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)
64907 MB/s +29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63831 MB/s +27%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
62852 MB/s +25%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
56902 MB/s +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (47938 - 53345, n=20)
50405 MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
50334 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
50231 MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
37200 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
69256 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)
68658 MB/s +35%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
68051 MB/s +33%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59391 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
51403 MB/s +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (43892 - 53321, n=20)
51062 MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
50996 MB/s
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
40708 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)
66727 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65800 MB/s +19%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
60001 MB/s +9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
56791 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55263 MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
55214 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (51085 - 57202, n=20)
55188 MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
41392 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
94.6 ns *
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91.3 ns * +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
90.8 ns * +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (80.7 - 120.6, n=20)
88.7 ns * +6%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87 ns * +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85.2 ns * +10%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
56 ns * +41%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在打开Edge浏览器时,Alienware没有出汗,但即使是打开我们的Notebookcheck主页也会导致笔记本出现延迟。内核和DirectX驱动似乎是罪魁祸首,还有其他一些原因。然后,一些竞争对手的延迟值甚至更高。

在播放我们的4K/60帧的YouTube视频时,出现了2个丢帧,内部GPU的负荷相当高。

YouTube视频测试。
YouTube视频测试。
LatencyMon主
LatencyMon主
LatencyMon驱动程序
LatencyMon驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4362 μs * -219%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3413 μs * -150%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1527.7 μs * -12%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1366.3 μs *
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1115 μs * +18%
Alienware m17 R4
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, 2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
585 μs * +57%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

戴尔安装了固态存储技术公司(SSSTC)的1TB NVMe Gen4 SSD。它在我们的HDD/SSD最佳列表中排名第20位,所以它应该足够快。

Diskspd循环中的SSD温度
Diskspd循环中的SSD温度

然而,安装的设备并没有接近参考模型的性能。它仍然明显低于其能力,而竞争对手的存储设备大多运行得更快。

在持续负载测试中,不稳定的进展显示,该硬盘无法保持其理论上的强大性能。据HWinfo称,冷却不是问题。

存储设备
Crystaldiskmark 6
Crystaldiskmark 6
AS SSD
AS SSD
AS SSD复制
AS SSD复制
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6917.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4965.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 355.65 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 308.74 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.19 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 118.53 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 306.7 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 991.67 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
80 pt
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
75.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
75.4 pt
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
70.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
60 pt
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
 
59.3 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
44.6 pt
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
33.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5568 (5541.55min - 5568.34max) MB/s +62%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4272 (1951.61min - 4271.9max) MB/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3872 (3855.82min - 3871.97max) MB/s +13%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3871 (2700.14min - 3870.94max) MB/s +13%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (3428 - 4119, n=6)
3772 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)
3487 MB/s +2%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3428 (3412.07min - 3428.49max) MB/s
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
2198 (2154.08min - 2198.45max) MB/s -36%
seq write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7531 (7479min - 7530.7max) MB/s +132%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4394 (4343.95min - 4393.95max) MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4242 (4225.7min - 4241.7max) MB/s +31%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4224 (3372.85min - 4224.08max) MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)
3797 MB/s +17%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (3242 - 4167, n=6)
3689 MB/s +14%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3243 (3188.93min - 3243.04max) MB/s
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
2794 (2773.48min - 2793.75max) MB/s -14%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12556 (4870.54min - 12556.3max) MB/s +83%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6921 (6272.83min - 6920.6max) MB/s +1%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (6810 - 6921, n=6)
6867 MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6861 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6384 (5573.36min - 6384.17max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)
6328 MB/s -8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6319 (1848.3min - 6318.66max) MB/s -8%
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
2957 (2704.91min - 2957.4max) MB/s -57%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10261 (10045.2min - 10261.4max) MB/s +112%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5259 (5245.4min - 5258.61max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5043 (5032.12min - 5043.21max) MB/s +4%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4852 (4198.71min - 4852.39max) MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4831 (4610.18min - 4830.79max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)
4823 MB/s 0%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (4244 - 4831, n=6)
4578 MB/s -5%
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
3255 (3119.98min - 3255.2max) MB/s -33%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
86.5 (85.74min - 86.52max) MB/s +65%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
79.1 (78.08min - 79.08max) MB/s +51%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
79 (77.42min - 79.03max) MB/s +50%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
74.1 (64.69min - 74.09max) MB/s +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)
65.8 MB/s +25%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (52.5 - 79.6, n=6)
63.8 MB/s +22%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
52.5 (50.71min - 52.46max) MB/s
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
37.2 (36.5min - 37.15max) MB/s -29%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
319 (315.54min - 318.7max) MB/s +152%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (126.7 - 280, n=6)
227 MB/s +79%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)
222 MB/s +75%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
221 (218.91min - 220.66max) MB/s +74%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
213 (195.99min - 212.69max) MB/s +68%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
195.1 (194.02min - 195.09max) MB/s +54%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
126.7 (123.88min - 126.69max) MB/s
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
95.3 (94.79min - 95.27max) MB/s -25%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4483 (4465.42min - 4482.78max) MB/s +432%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3564 (3554.96min - 3563.6max) MB/s +323%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3222 (3204.74min - 3221.65max) MB/s +282%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (843 - 3203, n=6)
2780 MB/s +230%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)
2555 MB/s +203%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2148 (1952.04min - 2148.3max) MB/s +155%
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
1650 (1311.12min - 1650.22max) MB/s +96%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
843 (833.55min - 843.1max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4383 (4358.15min - 4383.06max) MB/s +1422%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3570 (3534.41min - 3570.18max) MB/s +1140%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2623 (2563.77min - 2622.75max) MB/s +811%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2101 (1969.73min - 2101.4max) MB/s +630%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)
2101 MB/s +630%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (288 - 2213, n=6)
1710 MB/s +494%
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
1524 (1317.89min - 1523.66max) MB/s +429%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
288 (123min - 287.76max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9242 Points +131%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9218 Points +130%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7498 Points +87%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7306 Points +82%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (4008 - 7821, n=6)
6829 Points +70%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)
6737 Points +68%
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
4184 Points +4%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4008 Points
Score Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3629 Points +190%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3428 Points +174%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3012 Points +141%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (1250 - 3587, n=6)
2986 Points +139%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2837 Points +127%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)
2441 Points +95%
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
1706 Points +36%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1250 Points
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4113 Points +86%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3877 Points +75%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)
3113 Points +41%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3013 Points +36%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2964 Points +34%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (2211 - 2566, n=6)
2419 Points +9%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2211 Points
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
1598 Points -28%
Seq Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9971 MB/s +111%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5715 MB/s +21%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (4716 - 5771, n=6)
5475 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5157 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)
4944 MB/s +5%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4716 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3431 MB/s -27%
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
2733 MB/s -42%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8590 MB/s +222%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4370 MB/s +64%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3733 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)
3720 MB/s +39%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (2671 - 4201, n=6)
3518 MB/s +32%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3218 MB/s +20%
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
2822 MB/s +6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2671 MB/s
4K Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
94.04 MB/s +91%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.14 MB/s +63%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
72.43 MB/s +47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
68.93 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s +32%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (49.1 - 69.7, n=6)
58.7 MB/s +19%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
49.14 MB/s
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
45.04 MB/s -8%
4K Write
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
256.3 MB/s +113%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +76%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
204.33 MB/s +70%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
196.06 MB/s +63%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (120.1 - 242, n=6)
189.1 MB/s +57%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
157.01 MB/s +31%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
120.14 MB/s
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
88.4 MB/s -26%
4K-64 Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2963 MB/s +307%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2842.96 MB/s +290%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2413.38 MB/s +231%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (729 - 2959, n=6)
2379 MB/s +226%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1942.29 MB/s +167%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)
1876 MB/s +157%
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
1388 MB/s +90%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
728.79 MB/s
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3582.58 MB/s +96%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3299 MB/s +81%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)
2533 MB/s +39%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2331.1 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1949.41 MB/s +7%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (1712 - 1944, n=6)
1872 MB/s +3%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1824.12 MB/s
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
1227 MB/s -33%
Access Time Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.085 ms * -174%
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
0.079 ms * -155%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)
0.05509 ms * -78%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.034 ms * -10%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (0.023 - 0.059, n=6)
0.03233 ms * -4%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.031 ms *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.022 ms * +29%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0 ms * +100%
Access Time Write
Alienware m17 R4
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
0.095 ms * -197%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024
  (0.032 - 0.154, n=6)
0.07283 ms * -128%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)
0.04843 ms * -51%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.032 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.025 ms * +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.023 ms * +28%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.022 ms * +31%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.014 ms * +56%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø4118 (1511-6910.52)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø2976 (2200.96-6860.11)
Aorus 17X XES Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6907 (6282.04-6938.39)

图形卡

一个专门的AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT旨在提供游戏乐趣,其性能一般介于 RTX 3070RTX 3080.

该GPU在3DMark测试中表现不俗,让其竞争对手的 RTX 3070 Ti显著落后。m17 R4的 前身其RTX 3080或多或少地与R5持平,甚至与RTX 3080 Ti的竞争者也不相上下。

在电池模式下,3D性能下降了43%。

再次,与Cinebench类似,控制中心的性能模式似乎对Fire Strike 分数没有任何影响(见以下图片)。无论是平衡性能 还是全速,得分都几乎相同。也许,驱动程序在这里也没有与控制中心的设置进行互动。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMarkTime Spy
3DMarkTime Spy
3DMarkFire Strike
3DMarkFire Strike
3DMarkCloud Gate
3DMarkCloud Gate
3DMarkFire Strike 在电池模式下
3DMarkFire Strike 在电池模式下
3DMarkFire Strike 在平衡模式下
3DMarkFire Strike 在平衡模式下
3DMarkFire Strike 在全速模式下
3DMarkFire Strike 在全速模式下
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
97.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
97 pt
Alienware m17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-10980HK
96.9 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
93.4 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
 
93.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
90.5 pt
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
83.2 pt
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
74.9 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
44134 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
43823 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +4%
Alienware m17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-10980HK
43077 Points +3%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (41942 - 42089, n=2)
42016 Points 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
41942 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
38883 Points -7%
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
32001 Points -24%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Alienware m17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-10980HK
192950 Points +15%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (168293 - 177650, n=2)
172972 Points +3%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
168293 Points
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
151618 Points -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
149796 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points -15%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
34948 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (32853 - 34948, n=2)
33901 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
33120 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
32505 Points -7%
Alienware m17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-10980HK
32366 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points -11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
28088 Points -20%
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
25538 Points -27%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
12791 Points +7%
Alienware m17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-10980HK
12718 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
12684 Points +6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
11912 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (11762 - 11912, n=2)
11837 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
11316 Points -5%
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
9834 Points -17%
3DMark 11 Performance
30432 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
60255 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
28368 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11666 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average of class Gaming
  (63 - 399, n=10, last 2 years)
247 Seconds * -221%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
77 Seconds *
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (51 - 77, n=2)
64 Seconds * +17%
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
25 Seconds *
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
24 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
23 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)
21 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
41 Seconds *
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
40 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
36.7 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
34 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
379 Seconds * -3%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  (369 - 372, n=2)
371 Seconds * -1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
369 Seconds *
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
358 Seconds * +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
301 Seconds * +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)
297 Seconds * +20%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在游戏中,AMD Alienware的性能在很大程度上取决于所玩的游戏。在CPU重的游戏中,整个英特尔的竞争都是领先的,例如在DOTA 2重生中。

有时GPU切换不能正常工作。
有时GPU切换不能正常工作。

在GPU重度游戏中,潮水会转向,尽管有RTX 3080 Ti的强烈竞争,但m17 R5可以在最高位置找到(Witcher 3)。然而,总有一些游戏(GTA V)的性能低于平均水平。这也可能是由于驱动程序的原因。

X-Plane中的结果表明,图形切换没有发挥作用。这些结果是可以重复的。

在《毁灭之光2》和《赛博朋克2077》中的光线追踪性能比竞争对手的Nvidia 3000系列卡要弱。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
96.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
94.1 pt
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
83.9 pt
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
82.8 pt
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
81.6 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
76.2 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
126.2 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121 (98min) fps -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
119 fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118.8 (111min, 113P1) fps -6%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
115 (84min) fps -9%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
93.7 (80min) fps -26%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
126.7 (9.75min, 76.9P1) fps +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)
113 fps +22%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
112.9 (6.2min, 76.9P1) fps +22%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
110.9 (6.17min, 76.9P1) fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101.8 (18.4min, 71.4P1) fps +10%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93.9 (6.12min, 62.5P1) fps +1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
92.6 (7.62min, 55.6P1) fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
122.8 fps +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)
119 fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118.5 fps +4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
116.8 fps +3%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
113.6 fps
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
98.2 fps -14%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 fps -17%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
230 (121.4min, 165.6P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)
227 fps -1%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
212 (79.6min, 151P1) fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
211 (14.1min, 155.4P1) fps -8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
209 (59min, 156.2P1) fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
201 (41.3min, 148.1P1) fps -13%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
163.2 (82.8min, 122.4P1) fps -29%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
169.8 (147.2min) fps +81%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)
149.3 fps +59%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
148 (121.3min) fps +57%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
132.8 (108.1min) fps +41%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
132 (114.9min) fps +40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121.4 (106.8min) fps +29%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
94 (75.5min) fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
116.9 fps +170%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
116.2 fps +168%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)
107.2 fps +148%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
92.4 fps +113%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
88 fps +103%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
80.3 fps +85%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
43.3 fps
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
135 (112min) fps +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)
130.5 fps +28%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
126 fps +24%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
121 (93min) fps +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (81min) fps +11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
102 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  ()
102 fps 0%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (71 - 194, n=82, last 2 years)
118.9 fps +20%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
111 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110 (82min) fps +11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
99 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  ()
99 fps 0%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (39 - 113, n=29, last 2 years)
84.5 fps +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
70 (62min) fps +3%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
68 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  ()
68 fps 0%
Dying Light 2
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (52 - 174, n=11, last 2 years)
107.7 fps +25%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
86 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  ()
86 fps 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85.5 fps -1%
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (20.8 - 62, n=8, last 2 years)
44.9 fps +50%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
30 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  ()
30 fps 0%
1920x1080 High Quality Raytracing
Average of class Gaming
  (19.8 - 83.9, n=11, last 2 years)
47.8 fps +108%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
37.4 fps +63%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
23 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
  ()
23 fps 0%

在我们长达一小时的Witcher 3 循环中,整体帧率相当稳定,其性能值可与RTX 3070 Ti中的 Acer Predator甚至是 RTX 3080 TiXMG Neo 17.

GPU时钟几乎恒定在2.4至2.5GHz,该卡的温度约为75℃。GPU的功耗约为164W。

GPU时钟
GPU时钟
GPU温度
GPU温度
GPU的耗电量
GPU的耗电量

Witcher 3 FPS chart

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT: Ø114.1 (101-125)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø108.7 (103-115)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø119.7 (105-125)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 173.2 168.3 152 92.6 88.7 98.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 222 198.2 188.6 126.2 72.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 134.7 116.5 112.5 94 77.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 113.6 84.5 48.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 66.9 51 43.3 27.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 126 109 105 102 99 68
Strange Brigade (2018) 375 291 256 230 171 92.1
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 87 47
Dying Light 2 (2022) 136 107 86 60 30
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 57 26
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 86 54

排放 - CPU核心温度高,否则不明显

噪声

在空闲状态下,风扇在全速 模式之外基本保持沉默。然而,它们会周期性地短暂启动一到三秒,这毫无意义。这种情况甚至发生在关闭屏幕的睡眠模式下,这相当恼人。因此,在这里,驱动程序也没有得到完美的调整。

性能 模式下进行游戏时,新的m17变得比它的前辈略大,但与其他竞争者相比仍然相对安静,使其成为最安静的高性能游戏机之一。

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 28.11 / 28.11 dB(A)
Load
30.62 / 50.17 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.228.134.22537.838.937.83136.942.436.94029.730.129.75024.829.524.86331.223.131.28025.922.825.910032.821.532.81252518.72516030.317.730.320032.120.932.125033.518.733.531530.516.330.5400319.83150034.210.234.263037.21137.280036.19.836.110003710.2371250399.239160038.49.138.4200039.49.339.4250039.69.839.6315040.39.940.34000401040500040.210.340.2630036.410.436.4800030.710.530.71000025.410.625.4125002010.5201600015.49.715.4SPL50.222.950.2N7.10.57.1median 34.2median 10.3median 34.2Delta5.42.25.43230.73235.736.235.737.140.337.128.829.228.826.224.726.227.317.727.324.417.124.433.716.633.728.216.628.232.717.332.736.522.836.538.81838.837.413.837.436.713.236.737.411.337.441.710.241.744.510.544.5469.84647.89.347.852.810.152.851.310.351.351.310.651.353.910.953.953.811.153.851.311.351.350.611.650.649.311.649.348.511.848.545.911.745.940.710.740.762.723.562.715.40.515.4median 45.9median 11.3median 45.97.32.57.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAlienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Alienware m17 R4
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, 2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Noise
-9%
3%
-18%
-20%
-25%
off / environment *
23
24
-4%
23.9
-4%
23
-0%
26
-13%
26
-13%
Idle Minimum *
23
24
-4%
23.9
-4%
23
-0%
26
-13%
28
-22%
Idle Average *
28.11
25
11%
23.9
15%
25.92
8%
29
-3%
32
-14%
Idle Maximum *
28.11
36
-28%
23.9
15%
40.67
-45%
40
-42%
38
-35%
Load Average *
30.62
45
-47%
34.3
-12%
42.7
-39%
47
-53%
53
-73%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49.75
47
6%
62.48
-26%
52
-5%
54
-9%
Load Maximum *
50.17
50
-0%
45.9
9%
62.67
-25%
54
-8%
55
-10%

* ... smaller is better

温度

m17在怠速时始终保持凉爽,因此其前代产品异常高的怠速温度已成为过去。

掌托在负载下也保持凉爽。但是,会出现高达56℃的热点,特别是在靠近显示器的中央的底面。有一些竞争对手保持着较低的温度,但Alienware也不甘落后;至少有一台设备(Aorus 17)达到了类似的温度。

Max. Load
 47 °C53 °C46 °C 
 42 °C42 °C37 °C 
 28 °C27 °C29 °C 
Maximum: 53 °C
Average: 39 °C
43 °C56 °C46 °C
43 °C52 °C43 °C
26 °C27 °C25 °C
Maximum: 56 °C
Average: 40.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  52 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
Witcher 3 - 顶面
Witcher 3 - 顶面
Witcher 3 - 底部
Witcher 3 - 底部
Witcher 3 - 供电单元
Witcher 3 - 供电单元
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-25%
-1%
6%
0%
-16%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
58
-9%
48.8
8%
35
34%
49
8%
54
-2%
Maximum Bottom *
56
46
18%
52.4
6%
53
5%
52
7%
58
-4%
Idle Upper Side *
30
45
-50%
30.4
-1%
29
3%
30
-0%
37
-23%
Idle Bottom *
29
46
-59%
34.1
-18%
34
-17%
33
-14%
39
-34%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

核心在4.3GHz左右开始我们的压力测试。随着时间的推移,这个时钟保持得相当好,只下降了很小的幅度。核心温度多次达到100°C的高点!

GPU的温度在某种程度上更容易忍受,约为75℃。GPU的时钟频率平均为1.6GHz。

CPU时钟
CPU时钟
GPU时钟
GPU时钟
CPU温度
CPU温度
GPU温度
GPU温度
CPU功耗
CPU功耗
GPU的耗电量
GPU的耗电量
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃) GPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 4 1,6 94 75
Witcher 3 应力 0,71 2,4 70 75

发言人

立体声扬声器的声音相对较大,并且具有平衡的高音和中音。低音明显表现不足,这就是为什么建议通过耳机插孔、蓝牙或HDMI连接外部音频设备。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.827.931.8253532.7353137.535.437.5402824.7285033.222.533.26332.122.932.18024.218.924.21002816.8281252516.42516042.814.442.820055.419.355.425061.315.661.331565.410.265.440066.99.666.9500708.27063076.57.576.580074.98.274.9100072.38.372.31250758.775160070.49.570.4200066.49.666.4250068.910.468.9315064.710.564.7400068.810.968.8500066.211.166.2630066.811.366.8800068.81268.81000068.912.168.91250058.911.958.91600054.31154.3SPL82.622.682.6N570.457median 66.8median 10.9median 66.8Delta6.11.56.132.830.732.840.436.240.441.640.341.632.529.232.529.624.729.632.717.732.727.717.127.72716.62734.216.634.245.817.345.850.922.850.953.81853.857.613.857.655.313.255.351.511.351.558.510.258.563.910.563.9669.86664.19.364.166.410.166.46210.36259.910.659.96010.96056.211.156.257.111.357.159.111.659.160.111.660.161.511.861.555.611.755.652.810.752.873.823.573.832.90.532.9median 57.6median 11.3median 57.652.55hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAlienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 平均运行时间

消耗功率

m17 R5在空转时相当经济,在峰值负载时也 "胜过 "大多数竞争对手。然而,这款笔记本电脑在游戏时就不那么经济了:在Witcher 3 ,它的消耗量是所有对比设备中最大的。这并不令人惊讶,因为它在我们的Witcher 3 压力测试中也表现得最好。

扁平但宽大的电源装置是为240瓦的输出而设计的,因此实际上已经达到了极限。输入/输出功率的差异应确保它不会被淹没,并能应付偶尔出现的250瓦的负载峰值。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 13 / 16.5 / 17 Watt
Load midlight 93 / 251 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 3840x2160, 17"
Alienware m17 R4
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Average AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-119%
-40%
-21%
11%
-49%
-6%
-18%
Idle Minimum *
13
42
-223%
19.3
-48%
15
-15%
7
46%
18
-38%
11.5 ?(9.9 - 13, n=2)
12%
Idle Average *
16.5
48
-191%
26.5
-61%
20
-21%
11
33%
28
-70%
19.3 ?(16.5 - 22, n=2)
-17%
Idle Maximum *
17
58
-241%
27.1
-59%
22.3
-31%
17
-0%
36
-112%
20.1 ?(17 - 23.1, n=2)
-18%
Load Average *
93
124
-33%
141
-52%
133
-43%
92
1%
153
-65%
93.7 ?(93 - 94.4, n=2)
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
239
219
8%
225
6%
231
3%
221
8%
221
8%
Load Maximum *
251
337
-34%
307.9
-23%
290
-16%
306
-22%
290
-16%
264 ?(251 - 276, n=2)
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø241 (213.58-245.63)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø231 (219.64-251.66)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø245 (232.92-250.74)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø253 (215.17-290.16)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.5 (14.286-35.838)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø115.5 (112.08-117.88)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø187.7 (168.54-215.43)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø114.3 (112.5-116.18)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø181.6 (178.45-185.55)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø230 (219.96-237)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø200 (193.51-205.81)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø223 (218.7-227.89)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø215 (210.4-226.36)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø16 (14.306-17.775)

电池寿命

不幸的是,当你从插座上拔出电源插头时,m17不会自动切换到60赫兹以节省能源。这适用于所有模式,但在我们的电池测试中几乎没有负面影响。

电池的容量为97Wh,与竞争对手相比是较大的电池之一。然而,有两个竞争对手的表现更好。特别是Schenker XMG Neo 17,由于采用了巧妙的节能模式,它能够从大致相同大小的电池中挤出更多时间。也许上述急需的驱动程序改进会使m17有所改观。

在WiFi测试中,笔记本电脑持续了3.7到4.7小时,这取决于显示屏的亮度。一个电影之夜可以计划不到5个小时的时间。对于一个17英寸的设备来说,这些都是可靠的数值。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
4h 50min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
3h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 54min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 47min
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh
Alienware m17 R4
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-46%
-14%
14%
41%
-17%
16%
H.264
294
133
-55%
354
20%
398
35%
226
-23%
WiFi v1.3
290
141
-51%
250
-14%
362
25%
537
85%
266
-8%
Load
107
74
-31%
105
-2%
109
2%
86
-20%
Reader / Idle
722

Pros

+ 稳定的金属外壳
+ 简便的安装方式
+ 非常好的UHD显示器,120赫兹和DisplayP3
+ 优秀的3D显示
+ 在没有最后的情况下是静止的,在没有最后的情况下也是相对稳定的

Cons

- 大而重
- 没有USB 4、TB、SD读卡器、DP
- 相对较慢的WiFi
- 没有更多的数字键盘
- CPU性能弱于英特尔的竞争对手
- CPU核心温度高
- 固态硬盘性能弱
- 风扇短暂地鸣叫/风扇控制不好

结论。不完整的AMD玩家,潜力巨大

审查中的Alienware m17 R5,由戴尔提供。
审查中的Alienware m17 R5,由戴尔提供。

总体而言,Alienware m17 R5的全AMD系统令人印象深刻,尤其是图形性能。然而,各种驱动问题和不必要的不一致性使我们无法真正享受这样一台强大的游戏机。

除了强大的3D性能,我们特别喜欢它的制造质量,相当明亮的UHD显示屏,高色彩空间的覆盖率,以及游戏机在没有负载时通常很安静,在负载时也比一些竞争对手相当安静的事实。

但这是(驱动)问题开始的地方,因为即使在睡眠模式下,风扇也会无缘无故地突然转起来1-3秒。SmartAccess图形开关总是使系统冻结几秒钟,随机崩溃发生,控制中心的性能模式几乎没有带来任何性能上的变化,当然也可以在节能模式下从外星人身上挤出更多的电池寿命。

搭载AMD CPU和GPU的Alienware m17 R5是一款强大的游戏机,但不幸的是,在驱动方面仍有很多未开发的潜力和需要优化的地方。

非常遗憾的是,这款原本强大的游戏机目前正被这样的问题阻挠着它的潜力。如果你正在寻找一个稳定的替代品,直到这些问题得到解决,你面前有广泛的选择。刀片 Razer Blade 17也是一个坚实的机器,而 XMG Neo 17而XMG Neo 17则结合了液体冷却技术,提供了高性能。华硕 华硕ROG Strix Scar 17提供了更好的硬件以及蛮横的性能。

价格和可用性

戴尔的美国商店的Alienware m17 R5的配置起价为1399.99美元。与我们评测设备相同的配置价格为2549.99美元。

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) - 01/13/2023 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis
85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
59 / 80 → 73%
Weight
54 / 10-66 → 79%
Battery
61 / 95 → 64%
Display
87%
Games Performance
94%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
82 / 95 → 87%
Noise
83 / 90 → 92%
Audio
81%
Camera
35 / 85 → 41%
Average
76%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 笔记本电脑评论中的Alienware m17 R5。全AMD游戏机,潜力巨大,但驱动问题。
Christian Hintze, 2023-01-17 (Update: 2023-01-17)