宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 (PH16-72) 游戏笔记本电脑评测:尖牙利爪的掠食者
顶级硬件
高端硬件、绚丽的微型 LED 显示屏和高效的散热,使宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 成为真正的游戏梦想。实际上,这款游戏笔记本电脑中的 "掠食者 "非常安静。不过,我们的评测显示,这款笔记本电脑在拥有众多优势的同时也做出了一些妥协。DeepL / Marc Herter, 👁 Marc Herter (translated by Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论像猫一样咕噜咕噜叫的顶级掠食者
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 是一款功能强大的游戏笔记本电脑,具有诸多优势。出色的性能、绚丽的微型 LED 显示屏和高效的散热解决方案,带来了身临其境的游戏体验。广泛的定制选项和良好的功能使其整体表现更加出色。
在性能方面,宏碁游戏笔记本电脑是一个全面的令人印象深刻的套件,避免了过大的风扇散热噪音。除了游戏之外,得益于强大的 RTX 4080 和充足的内存,这款游戏本还适用于各种 AI 应用、视频编辑或使用 Blender 或其他 3D 程序进行创意工作。
不过,你也不得不做出一些妥协。电池续航时间并不突出,安装不佳的固态硬盘在持续负载下往往会出现节流现象。
总的来说,宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 对于寻求功能强大、可单独定制的笔记本电脑的游戏玩家来说是个不错的选择。不过,对于那些特别看重长电池续航时间的人来说,也许应该寻找其他替代品。例如,我们数据库中的两款竞争对手在这方面的定位要高得多。华硕 ROG Strix Scar 16和Acer Predator Triton Neo的电池续航时间更长,而 Strix Scar 的规格与我们的评测设备相当。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
我们的评测配置宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 是这款游戏机目前最先进的版本。不过,宏碁已经宣布 继任者采用最新英特尔处理器和英伟达GeForce RTX 5000 GPU。不过,预计最早也要到 2025 年第二季度才会上市。
继任者的宣布已经导致当前 Helios 16 的价格下降。最初的零售价为 3000 美元,而现在只需 2500 美元左右。因此,如果你正在寻找一款性能强大、性价比极高的游戏笔记本电脑,现在就应该货比三家,并密切关注价格的变化。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $6.45 Keyboard Cover Compatible 20... 2. $3.99 Silicone Keyboard Cover Skin... 3. $5.99 Keyboard Cover for 2024 New ... | 2.7 kg | 29.6 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $5,399.99 List Price: 3400 USD | 3.6 kg | 32 mm | 18.00" 3840x2400 252 PPI Mini-LED | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,788.00 List Price: 3199 EUR | 2.7 kg | 30.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI Mini LED | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,549.00 List Price: 2999 Euro | 2.7 kg | 21.95 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,078.49 Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ... 2. $1,089.00 Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ... 3. $2,035.11 acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ... List Price: 1900 EUR | 2 kg | 21 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI IPS | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 4273€ | 3.4 kg | 24.9 mm | 17.30" 3840x2160 255 PPI IPS |
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16(PH16-72-90ZU)是一款顶级游戏笔记本电脑,建议零售价为 3000 美元(目前市场价约为 2500 美元),主要面向追求最高性能和创新功能的游戏玩家和内容创作者。其亮点包括色彩还原度极高的微型 LED 显示屏和可更换的 MagKey 3.0 键帽。Helios 16 还配备了最新的 WiFi 7 标准,有助于实现最快的无线连接。
但令人印象深刻的不仅仅是这些特殊功能。宏碁还在内部做了大量工作。基于两个 AeroBlade 3D 风扇和液态金属散热膏的先进散热解决方案确保了强大的硬件,即英特尔酷睿 i9-14900H 处理器。 英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX处理器和 英伟达GeForce RTX 4080在实现最佳冷却效果的同时,还能保持相对安静。高端组件与高效散热的完美结合带来了出色的基准测试成绩。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 的外壳由深蓝到黑色的铝合金制成,不仅看起来坚固耐用,而且给人一种高品质的感觉。做工完美无瑕,缝隙精确无误,足见宏碁工程师的用心。即使内部的游戏硬件陷入白热化的战斗,表面也能保持凉爽宜人,这对长时间游戏来说真是一大福音。
Helios 16 的设计棱角分明,现代感十足。它的 RGB 灯条低调地隐藏在屏幕后面,这意味着它不会在游戏时分散用户的注意力。掌托和屏幕盖上的 Predator 徽标是醒目的图形感叹号。屏幕可以轻松向后打开,从而确保坐姿符合人体工学,防止颈部肌肉紧张。两个铰链可以稳固地固定位置,但操作起来依然顺畅。
特点快速、多功能
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 配备了各种现代端口,方便地分布在设备的三面。WiFi 7 是最新的 Wi-Fi 标准,可确保快速的网络连接。有线网络支持 2.5 GBit LAN,端口位于左侧。
USB 端口位于三面,而 HDMI 和 DisplayPort(通过 USB-C)仅位于背面。一个速度一般的 microSD 读卡器和一个 Kensington 锁插槽完善了端口选择。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
网络摄像头
全高清网络摄像头可用于视频会议和流媒体,提供标准的图像质量和良好的色彩还原。
安全
在数字时代,敏感数据的保护越来越受到关注。Acer Predator Helios 16 充分考虑了这一要求,提供了各种安全机制。该设备有一个 Kensington 锁插槽,可防止被盗。此外,还配备了 TPM 2.0 安全机制,可确保密码和加密代码的安全。不过,您将不得不放弃指纹传感器或面部识别等生物识别验证方法。
配件
对于 Predator Helios 16,宏碁非常重视定制。风扇格栅可以更换,让笔记本电脑更具个性。W、A、S 和 D 键的键帽也可以更换,这不仅能在视觉上起到点缀作用,还能根据个人喜好调整键盘的手感。
可持续性
在购买游戏笔记本电脑时,可持续发展可能不是购买标准的首要考虑因素。遗憾的是,宏碁没有提供任何有关我们评测设备二氧化碳排放量的数据。我们也无法找到 EPEAT 注册或类似信息。这款游戏笔记本电脑的包装盒中还含有大量泡沫包装材料。
不过,宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 的维护还是非常容易的。底板用几颗 Torx 螺钉固定,然后就可以接触到最重要的部件。Wi-Fi 模块和内存都可以轻松更换--只需取下粘好的黑色塑料盖即可。在大容量存储方面,除了已安装的 NVMe 固态硬盘外,还提供了一个额外的 M.2 插槽来扩展存储容量。
输入设备:MagiKey 3.0 键盘
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 的键盘对于一款高品质游戏笔记本电脑来说绰绰有余。N-Key Rollover 可确保每一次按键都被记录下来,无论同时按下多少个按键。RGB 灯光让键盘沉浸在色彩斑斓的氛围中,确保每个按键都有自己的颜色。一个特别的噱头是可互换的 WASD 键,它不仅在视觉上引人注目,而且还能提供个性化的触觉反馈。宏碁为这款笔记本电脑提供了两种有趣的替代方案。使用 MagClick 键,用户可以体验到独特的触觉反馈,而 MagSpeed 键则突出了 RGB 灯光。总的来说,键盘具有出色的触觉反馈和舒适的压力点。
触摸板尺寸宽大,表面光滑。鼠标指针能快速、精确地跟随每个移动。不过也有一个小缺点:触摸板稍微向左移了一点,这意味着在玩游戏时,WASD 键并不像你所希望的游戏笔记本那样容易触及。
显示屏高分辨率、1,000 cd/m² 微型 LED 面板
如果你想正常玩游戏,你需要一个快速的屏幕。Acer Predator Helios 16 配备了出色的 16 英寸迷你 LED 显示屏,纵横比为 16:10,每秒可显示 250 帧画面。它的分辨率为 2,560 × 1,600 像素,像素密度为 189 PPI,为创意工作和游戏提供了锐利的图像和充足的空间。由于支持 HDR1000,屏幕亮度超过 1,000 cd/m²,即使在明亮的环境中也能呈现清晰、高对比度的图像。即使没有激活 HDR,亮度也在 670 cd/m² 左右,令人印象深刻。
另一个优点是响应速度快,尤其是从 20% 灰度切换到 80% 灰度时。这确保了动作的流畅性,不会出现恼人的拖影现象,这对动作类游戏尤其有利。不过,从黑色过渡到白色时,响应时间会明显延长。这是技术原因造成的,也是微型 LED 显示器的典型特点。但在实际使用中,由于即使在游戏中也很少出现极端的亮度变化,因此这种影响几乎不明显。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 380 cd/m²
Contrast: 6990000:1 (Black: 0.0001 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 2.17
ΔE Greyscale 5.14 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.12% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.82% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.018
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 AUO43A8, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | MSI Raider 18 HX A14V AU Optronics B180ZAN1.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18", 120 Hz | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR BOE NE160QDM-NM7, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H BOE CQ NE16QDM-NZB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P AU Optronics B160QAN04.S, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) BOE, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 144 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | -1% | -3% | -5% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.82 | 96.6 -3% | 99.8 0% | 98.5 -1% | 94.2 -6% | 93.51 -6% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% | 99.86 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.12 | 84.8 -10% | 90.8 -4% | 86.7 -8% | 85.3 -9% | 84.33 -10% |
Response Times | -19% | 31% | 8% | 10% | 15% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.2 ? | 10.4 ? -44% | 5 ? 31% | 12.6 ? -75% | 12.3 ? -71% | 11.593 ? -61% |
Response Time Black / White * | 67.6 ? | 75.8 ? -12% | 10.4 ? 85% | 5.8 ? 91% | 5.8 ? 91% | 6 ? 91% |
PWM Frequency | 2630 | 2606.2 ? -1% | 2040 ? -22% | |||
Screen | -16% | -44421% | -46643% | -46650% | -60013% | |
Brightness middle | 699 | 575.7 -18% | 490 -30% | 487 -30% | 458 -34% | 548 -22% |
Brightness | 672 | 574 -15% | 487 -28% | 460 -32% | 453 -33% | 505 -25% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 94 2% | 94 2% | 88 -4% | 90 -2% | 86 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.0001 | 0.4 -399900% | 0.42 -419900% | 0.42 -419900% | 0.54 -539900% | |
Contrast | 6990000 | 1225 -100% | 1160 -100% | 1090 -100% | 1015 -100% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.89 | 3.56 8% | 1.08 72% | 1.12 71% | 1.58 59% | 3.81 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.51 | 8.64 -57% | 2.38 57% | 2.26 59% | 3.47 37% | 7.9 -43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.17 | 2.69 -24% | 0.9 59% | 0.54 75% | 0.77 65% | 2.54 -17% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.14 | 5.6 -9% | 1.1 79% | 1.4 73% | 2.3 55% | 5.4 -5% |
Gamma | 2.018 109% | 2.34 94% | 2.13 103% | 2.242 98% | 2.201 100% | 2.062 107% |
CCT | 7113 91% | 7872 83% | 6724 97% | 6809 95% | 6540 99% | 7224 90% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-14% | -14797% /
-26647% | -15546% /
-29984% | -15548% /
-29989% | -20001% /
-38579% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Predator Helios 16 的显示屏覆盖了 99.82% 的 DCI-P3 色彩空间,是图像和视频编辑等创意任务的理想之选。即使在未经校准的情况下,该屏幕也能以其出色的色彩准确性给人留下深刻印象。平均 Delta-E 值为 3.89,肉眼几乎无法察觉到轻微的色彩偏差。校准后,Delta-E 值甚至远远低于 3,这也使该屏幕适合专业应用。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
67.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 64.8 ms rise | |
↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2630 Hz Amplitude: 100 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 2630 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 2630 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
凭借超过 1,000 cd/m² 的高亮度,Acer Predator Helios 16 即使在阳光直射的室外也能使用。虽然显示屏上的反光无法完全避免,但可以将其降到最低。亚光显示屏表面也有助于最大限度地减少恼人的反光。
微型 LED 显示屏的视角稳定性极佳。即使在极端视角下,色彩和对比度也能保持稳定,不会出现失真或反转。这使得几个人可以同时观看屏幕,而无需放弃最佳的观看体验。
性能:顶级规格确保高性能
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 有多种配置可供选择,以满足用户的个性化需求。我们的评测设备配备了顶级功能:一个 英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX处理器,拥有 24 个内核(32 个线程)和 2.20 GHz 的主频,可提供强大的计算能力。搭配 英伟达GeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑图形处理器12 GB 专用显存和 32 GB DDR5 内存,即使是要求最苛刻的游戏和应用程序也能轻松胜任。2 TB PCIe NVMe 固态硬盘保证了快如闪电的加载时间和流畅的多任务处理。
另外,配置有 英伟达GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU或 英特尔酷睿 i7-14700HX处理器的配置。内存有 16 GB 和 32 GB 两种规格,固态硬盘有 1 TB 和 2 TB 两种容量。这意味着 Helios 16 可以根据您的预算和所需性能进行最佳调整。根据零售商的不同,有不同的配置可供选择。从 2025 年第二季度开始 配备英特尔最新人工智能处理器和 RTX 5000 GPU 的掠夺者 Helios 16将上市。
测试条件
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 的性能可以通过预装的 PredatorSense 软件进行调节。有四种不同的性能选项可供选择:"安静"、"平衡"、"性能 "和 "加速"。经过一些测试,"性能 "模式被证明是我们进行其他基准测试的最佳选择。在游戏时,它能在悦耳的风扇噪音和高性能之间取得最佳平衡。
值得注意的是,Helios 16 的性能管理对 14900HX 相当谨慎,会慢慢接近目标温度。这意味着,在某些情况下,用户可能需要几分钟时间才能充分发挥处理器的性能。
性能模式概述
性能模式 | Prime95 CPU 功耗 | Furmark GPU 功耗 | Prime95 和 Furmark CPU/GPU 功耗 | 赛博朋克 2077 PL QHD 基准测试 |
---|---|---|---|---|
静音 | 55 瓦 | 95 瓦 | 50 瓦/35 瓦 | 61fps |
平衡 | 85 瓦 | 115 瓦 | 65 瓦/85 瓦 | 64fps |
性能 | 95 瓦 | 140 瓦 | 55 瓦/ 110 瓦 | 72fps |
涡轮 | 120瓦 | 175瓦 | 90瓦/ 130瓦 | 81帧/秒 |
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 中的英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX 是一款真正的强力处理器。它拥有 24 个内核(8 个 P 核心和 16 个 E 核心),可串联处理 32 个线程,为要求苛刻的游戏和应用提供了足够的计算能力。有趣的是,在所有性能模式下,该处理器的提升功耗(PL2)仍为 140 瓦。
在宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 中,i9-14900HX 无需风扇全速运转即可提供高于平均水平的性能。Helios 16 的高效冷却解决方案使其即使在高负载情况下也能控制 CPU 的运行,同时确保噪音水平适宜。这一点非常出色,主要是与其他游戏笔记本电脑相比,如 联想Legion Pro 7和 华硕 ROG Strix Scar 16或 申克 Key 17 Pro其中一些产品的 PL1 和 PL2 值要高得多,但音量要大得多。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17078 - 36249, n=37) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1720 - 2245, n=37) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6579 - 13832, n=37) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (657 - 859, n=37) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3263 - 5589, n=38) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (247 - 323, n=37) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=189, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (91 - 206, n=37) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (66769 - 136645, n=37) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (5452 - 7545, n=37) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13158 - 19665, n=37) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=113, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2419 - 3129, n=37) | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=113, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8618 - 23194, n=37) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1669 - 2210, n=37) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (16.8 - 38.9, n=37) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=181, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (19 - 85.1, n=37) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=185, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=37) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13098 - 33474, n=36) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=181, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (67573 - 166040, n=36) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3589 - 7979, n=36) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148966, n=36) | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (10475 - 18517, n=36) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (32543 - 83662, n=36) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=36) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=181, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1054 - 2292, n=36) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6809 - 18349, n=36) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=181, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (23903 - 54702, n=36) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=182, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V |
系统性能
高端处理器、功能强大的显卡、充足的内存和快速的大容量存储空间的完美结合,使运行流畅、反应灵敏,即使是计算密集型任务也能轻松应对。无论是在日常数字生活中,还是沉浸于虚拟世界或发挥创造力,Helios 16 都能轻松应对所有这些挑战。Helios 16 还在人工智能领域大放异彩,并能快速取得成果。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (7703 - 9223, n=7) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (11255 - 12600, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=162, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (6662 - 11410, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (14211 - 16246, n=7) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1992 - 2334, n=7) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=143, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1812 - 2204, n=7) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=143, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2327 - 2500, n=7) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=143, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1520 - 2254, n=7) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=143, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (310 - 345, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (300 - 321, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 328, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=175, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (437 - 446, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 9070 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (38028 - 83392, n=36) | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=181, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43306 - 87568, n=36) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=181, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (37146 - 80589, n=36) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=181, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (76.1 - 105, n=36) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 的 DPC 延迟相对较低。不过,LatencyMon 指出,在某些情况下可能会出现问题,表现为音频噼啪声或卡顿。此类问题是否会发生以及发生的程度取决于个人软件配置和所使用的驱动程序。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Predator Helios 内置的 2 TB Micron 3400 固态硬盘速度可能很快,但更像是短跑运动员。在长时间负载的情况下,NVMe SSD 会变得过热,从而降低速度。不过,宏碁还在内存模块上盖了一些盖子,这让它们看起来更漂亮,但也会导致热量积聚。玩家们或许还可以在这方面进行一些改进。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
英伟达 英伟达GeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑图形处理器是市场上最强大的显卡之一,使宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 成为真正的游戏机。即使不启动 "Turbo "模式,GPU 也能提供令人印象深刻的性能,这体现在渲染和人工智能基准测试中的高分上。虽然从分数上可以看出与采用相同显卡的竞争对手存在差距,但 Helios 16 凭借更安静的噪音水平赢得了分数。例如 微星 Raider 18在游戏时达到 60 分贝(A),但宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 在我们的测试模式下仅达到 48 分贝(A)。对于那些喜欢在游戏时更安静一些的玩家来说,这是一个明显的优势。
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 64258 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 31656 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 17167 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 4173 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 17244 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Geekbench ML - 0.6 ONNX DirectML GPU | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti |
Geekbench AI | |
Quantized ONNX DirectML GPU 1.1 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Half Precision ONNX DirectML GPU 1.1 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Single Precision ONNX DirectML GPU 1.1 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG |
游戏性能
在为台式机组装游戏硬件时,通常会一起选择屏幕和显卡。屏幕每秒显示的图像数应是显卡帧数的两到三倍。这样可以有效避免明显的屏幕撕裂。Predator Helios 16 的屏幕频率为 250 Hz,在所有游戏中都能达到 83 至 125fps,以便为出色的屏幕提供适当的动力。
在我们测试的大多数游戏中,使用最高画质设置和显示器的原始分辨率都能达到这个速度。诸如《赛博朋克 2077》和《F1 2024》等光线追踪游戏的运行速度也远远超过了 60fps。
总之,宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 在游戏方面给人留下了深刻的印象。
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 208, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=176, last 2 years) |
在运行《赛博朋克 2077》的长期测试中,每秒帧数在游戏几分钟后略有下降。不过,帧率随后一直保持在 100fps 以上。性能下降幅度约为 10%。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 184.5 | 171.9 | 112.1 | 106.5 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 231 | 212 | 201 | 172.7 | 182.4 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 183.9 | 177.3 | 139 | 116.6 | 71.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 185 | 153.3 | 122.6 | 119 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 337 | 293 | 266 | 197.1 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 140 | 99.7 | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 144.7 | 104.3 | 106.1 | 72.5 | ||
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 62.5 | 40.7 | ||||
F1 24 (2024) | 233 | 231 | 68.7 | |||
God of War Ragnarök (2024) | 146.3 | 111.2 |
排放物:猫科捕食者的无声爪子
噪音排放
在涡轮增压模式下,宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 将大显身手,除了令人印象深刻的性能外,还能实现高达 59.4 dB(A) 的噪音水平。如前所述,性能模式为喜欢安静的玩家提供了一个绝佳的选择。在该模式下,音量最高可达 45.6 分贝(A)至 48 分贝(A)。这样的音量在较长时间的游戏中也是可以承受的,再加上良好的扬声器,可以提供身临其境的游戏体验,而不必牺牲太多的性能。
如果您喜欢特别安静的游戏环境,甚至可以长时间操作 Helios 16,使其几乎听不到声音或保持静音。在平衡模式下,负载情况下的噪音水平保持在 35 分贝(A)至 39 分贝(A)之间,令人愉悦。在流媒体播放或办公时,风扇几乎总是听不到或非常安静。同样令人高兴的是,这款游戏笔记本电脑的风扇不会产生任何令人不快的频率,长期使用也不会令人讨厌。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26.1 / 29.4 / 31.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 0 / 45.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26.1 dB(A) |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH | MSI Raider 18 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -9% | -3% | -11% | -12% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 26.1 | 23.3 11% | 21.07 19% | 24 8% | 24 8% | 23.41 10% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.1 | 28.6 -10% | 29.75 -14% | 25 4% | 32 -23% | 25.33 3% |
Idle Average * | 29.4 | 28.6 3% | 29.75 -1% | 30 -2% | 34 -16% | 25.33 14% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.9 | 31.3 2% | 29.75 7% | 45 -41% | 40 -25% | 25.33 21% |
Load Average * | 44.1 | 54.85 | 50 | 48 | 33.57 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48.2 | 59.4 -23% | 50 -4% | 61.97 -29% | ||
Load Maximum * | 45.6 | 62.7 -38% | 58 -27% | 56 -23% | 51 -12% | 62.14 -36% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 57.8 | 54 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在最苛刻的条件下,宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 也能保持冷静的头脑和冷静的外壳。即使 CPU 和 GPU 的内部热量占主导地位,按键和掌托也始终保持清爽宜人。热图像可能会显示内部的散热片正在发热,但这些废热并没有传到机箱内。我们的相机透过通风槽进行拍摄。诚然,在压力测试中,底盖的温度高达 50 °C,但在满负荷运行的情况下,你可能很少会把游戏笔记本放在膝盖上。尤其令人印象深刻的是,即使在游戏和涡轮增压模式下,Helios 16 也没有失去它的勇气。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|
Heat | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 37.5 |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.9 |
Idle Upper Side * | 31 |
Idle Bottom * | 42 |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
为了将宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 推向极限,我们使用 Prime95 和 FurMark 进行了压力测试。这两个程序使 CPU 和 GPU 在较长时间内承受最大负荷,模拟了最糟糕的情况。我们记录了一小时内温度和性能的变化。
结果如何?根据性能模式的不同,最初的提升阶段会持续几秒到两分钟不等,之后 Helios 16 稳定在一个恒定的水平。温度保持在可承受的范围内,没有观察到性能下降。这表明,即使在极端负载情况下,Helios 16 的液态金属冷却系统也能有效工作,保护硬件不过热。
发言人
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 的扬声器音质浑厚,低音均衡,中音清晰。81.9 dB(A)的最大音量明显压倒了风扇,这意味着即使在高强度的游戏过程中也能听到风扇的声音。
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:空闲运行时消耗高
耗电量
空闲运行时,宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 并不是最经济的。功耗相对较高,这当然会影响电池寿命。不过,在负载情况下,对于配备此类强大硬件的游戏笔记本电脑来说,耗电量在预期范围之内。因此,如果你需要一款电池续航时间最长的笔记本电脑,你应该寻找其他替代品。不过,对于希望充分发挥 Helios 16 性能的游戏玩家和超级用户来说,功耗还是可以接受的。
Off / Standby | 0.55 / 2.1 Watt |
Idle | 31.5 / 31.5 / 47.5 Watt |
Load |
/ 313 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Raider 18 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N, IPS, 3200x2000, 16" | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -10% | 40% | 23% | 52% | 24% | 27% | 40% | |
Idle Minimum * | 31.5 | 27.7 12% | 10.71 66% | 16 49% | 10 68% | 12.16 61% | 16.9 ? 46% | 13.7 ? 57% |
Idle Average * | 31.5 | 38.3 -22% | 14.75 53% | 21 33% | 15 52% | 15.97 49% | 22 ? 30% | 19 ? 40% |
Idle Maximum * | 47.5 | 47.1 1% | 30 37% | 36 24% | 23 52% | 23.71 50% | 34.1 ? 28% | 26.9 ? 43% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 231 | 313 -35% | 122 47% | 274 -19% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 270 | 306 -13% | 118.7 56% | 280 -4% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 313 | 321.8 -3% | 307 2% | 360 -15% | 206 34% | 301 4% | 297 ? 5% | 250 ? 20% |
Load Average * | 121.2 | 135 | 132 | 80 | 113.06 | 117.9 ? | 106.1 ? | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 286 | 267 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 配备了 90 Wh 的电池,电池续航时间应该不错。然而,即使在空闲运行时,约 30 瓦的高耗电量也让这一期望落空。Helios 16 的运行时间并不出色,这可能是由于采用了耗电的英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX 和未优化管理的图形处理器。
不过,改进还是有希望的:改进能源管理的软件更新可以延长未来的电池寿命。在此之前,用户将不得不忍受所给出的运行时间,不过,对于该性能类别的游戏笔记本电脑来说,这还在预期范围之内。
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI Raider 18 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -29% | 57% | 35% | 60% | 11% | 36% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 277 | 198 -29% | 434 57% | 373 35% | 444 60% | 203 -27% | 377 ? 36% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 45 | 67 49% | |||||
Reader / Idle | 264 | 576 ? | |||||
Load | 76 | 51 | 64 | 85.5 ? | |||
H.264 | 451 | 413 ? | |||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 57 | 78.3 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16 是一款非常实用、功能强大的游戏笔记本电脑,几乎在所有领域都表现出色。广泛的自定义选项可让您根据自己的喜好调整设备。它的性能非常出色,即使在负载情况下,风扇也能保持令人愉悦的音量。特别值得一提的是,即使将风扇设置为静音,Helios 16 也能提供出色的游戏性能。只有电池续航时间还可以更好一些。
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72
- 01/13/2025 v8
DeepL / Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.