Honor Magic V3 评测--最薄的可折叠手机现在更薄了

Name: Honor Magic V3
Brand: Honor

甚至更苗条 Honor 更新了它的超薄可折叠智能手机，现在变得更薄、更防水了。手机内部配备了包括大容量电池在内的大量现代化硬件。它的摄像头甚至配备了潜望镜变焦镜头，但遗憾的是，Magic V3 的产品还存在一些不足。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 09/05/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Foldable Touchscreen Smartphone

去年 Magic V2已被视为可折叠智能手机架构的基准，因为它是迄今为止同类产品中最薄的。遗憾的是，V2 在中国发布六个月后才进入国际市场。虽然它是在 2023 年的柏林国际消费电子展（IFA）上发布的，但直到 2024 年 1 月，感兴趣的人才能亲手拿到它。

今年，Magic V3 在 IFA 上再次面向全球市场亮相，但应该很快就能买到。在测试时，具体日期尚未确定。Honor 可折叠手机配备了高通公司的最新芯片组，并拥有大量存储空间。它现已通过 IP 认证，应该会更加坚固耐用。为了捍卫最薄可折叠智能手机的称号，它还变得更加纤薄--尽管内部的电池提供了更大的能量。

我们的评测将揭示所有这些优势是否足以让这款手机夺得可折叠手机的桂冠。

Test device courtesy of Honor Global

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor Magic V3 (Magic V Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 750

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

7.92 inch 1.09:1, 2344 x 2156 pixel 402 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, OLED, LTPO: 1 -120 Hz, Honor Super Armored, 3840 Hz PWM-Dimming; exterior screen: 6.43", OLED, 2376 x 1060 px, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, 4.320 Hz PWM-Dimming, NanoCrystal Shield, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB

, 483.5 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Rotation, Magnetometer, Barometer, Proximity, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G, LTE, 5G-Sub6, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 4.35 x 156.6 x 145.3

Battery

5150 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon battery (Gen. 3), 66W Charging, 50W Wireless Charging

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (IMX906, 1/1.56", f/1.6, SMA, OIS) + 50 MPix (3.5x Tele, 1/2.51", f/3.0, OIS) + 40 MPix (Ultra Wide/Macro, 112°, f/2.2); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (In- and exterior: f/2.2)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, 66W-Charger, USB-Cabel, SIM-Tool, MagicOS 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, Body-SAR: W/kg, Head-SAR: W/kg; IPX8, HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision; Bluetooth-Audio-Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC; DRM Widevine L1, eSIM; GNSS: A-GPS, GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C), Galileo (E1, E5a), fanless, waterproof

Weight

226 g, Power Supply: 135 g

Price

2000 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
86.3 %	v8	09/2024	Honor Magic V3 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750	226 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7.92"	2344x2156
86.1 %	v8	08/2024	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750	239 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7.60"	2160x1856
87.3 %	v7 ^(old)	11/2023	Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	259 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8.03"	2160x1916
88.8 %	v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Vivo X Fold3 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	219 g	1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	8.03"	2480x2200
89 %	v7 ^(old)	02/2024	Honor Magic V2 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	231 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7.92"	2344x2156
88.3 %	v7 ^(old)	12/2023	Oppo Find N3 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	239 g	1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	7.82"	2440x2268

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息请点击此处.

外壳：耐用钢铰链和 IPX8 级防护

即使到了 2024 年，Honor Magic V3 依然是最薄的可折叠智能手机。据称，在折叠打开状态下，其厚度仅为 4.35 毫米，而在合上状态下，其厚度为 9.2 毫米。我们用卡尺分别测量了 5.0 毫米和 10.05 毫米，加上摄像头驼峰，我们注意到它的厚度为 15.05 毫米。Honor ，可能按比例还包括了圆形边框。与 iPhone 15 Pro Max相比，Magic V3 仅略高一些，最重要的是，它比上一代产品明显纤薄。

它的制造质量非常出色。Honor 强调了外部显示屏的耐用性，该显示屏由纳米水晶盾形玻璃保护。即使从 2 米高处跌落也不会对手机造成任何问题。在测试过程中，我们多次将手机从腰部高度摔落，之后也没有发现手机表面有任何变化。

不锈钢铰链也得到了进一步改进，增加了第二个旋转臂，与Magic V2 上的铰链相比，其抗拉强度提高了 1250%，抗拉强度达到 2100 兆帕，现在至少可以执行 50 万次折叠操作。按每天折叠 100 次计算，这相当于超过 13 年的耐用性，比 V3 的生命周期要长得多。

可折叠显示屏现在由抗冲击硅凝胶材料保护，在受到冲击时可在几毫秒内凝固。虽然显示屏上的折痕仍然清晰可见，但相对来说比较平整。

此外，Honor Magic V3 现在具备 IPX8 防水功能。它有黑色、绿色和红棕色三种颜色可供选择，后者的背面是合成皮革，而另外两种则使用了磨砂玻璃。

Magic V3 与带有 MagicRing 的 MagicPad 2 相映成趣（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）

尺寸比较

连接性 - Magic V3 让人想起 V2

Honor 手机的连接功能没有大的变化。Magic V3 仍配备一个 USB 3.2 端口（Gen 1），在使用三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘进行复制测试时，数据传输速率达到 203.88 MB/s。连接的数据载体可格式化为 FAT32、exFAT 和 NTFS。支持有线图像输出，但只是镜像显示。

除此之外，V3 还支持蓝牙 5.3、NFC 和红外触发器。后者可将Honor 智能手机变成电视、空调等设备的遥控器。另一方面，V3 不支持更先进的蓝牙 5.4、LE 或 AuraCast。

软件 - Magic V3 支持谷歌人工智能功能

Magic V3 预装了谷歌Android 14 和名为 MagicOS 8.0 的内部用户界面。它将接受四次版本更新和为期五年的安全补丁。后者据称将按月交付，但在测试时，最新的补丁是 2024 年 7 月的，虽然仍是最新的，但不是最晚的。根据我们的经验，补丁通常总是比三星或谷歌的补丁晚一个月左右。

我们已经从Magic6 Pro 和Magic6 RSR 上熟悉了这个 UI，而且它已经出现在Magic V2 上。Magic Portal 等人工智能支持的功能也已登场。此外，仿照 iPhone 动态岛设计的 Magic Capsule 和可用于在设备间交换内容的 MagicRing 也已回归。有关 MagicOS 的更多信息，请访问Honor 。

新功能之一是在手机的人工智能功能方面与谷歌的合作。除了设备自身的人工智能功能外，还与谷歌云（Google Cloud）建立了合作关系。这些功能在Honor 应用程序中实现，但随后在谷歌服务器上进行。这些功能包括照片工具（魔力橡皮擦），可用于删除不需要的物体和人物；基于文本的实时翻译，用于个人对话；以及使用Honor Notes 进行语音转文本。后者可以创建文本或将其他语言转录为您自己的语言。这在我们的测试中效果不错，但目前可供选择的语言还不多。

此外还预装了一些第三方应用程序，但可以删除。

可持续性

Honor Magic V3 的外包装盒比较大，但盒内盒外没有任何塑料痕迹。所有配件都用小纸箱包装。Honor 没有提供任何有关 Magic V3 的_二氧化碳排放量或是否使用可回收材料的信息。不过，我们收到了这样一份声明：

HONOR 始终坚持生产更环保、更可持续发展的产品，旨在提升用户体验的同时减少对环境的负面影响。我们将绿色和循环经济理念融入产品开发的全生命周期，开发和引进绿色低碳适用技术，为用户提供创新、环保、高品质的产品。
2023 年，通过技术创新，我们累计减少和避免了约 876 吨温室气体排放。这一减少是在产品研究与设计、材料选择与使用、耐用性改进和产品效率提升等阶段实现的。
我们成立了绿色产品技术管理团队，在环境法规、绿色产品设计和清洁生产技术等专业领域开展研究。该团队从产品性能和生产材料等各个方面探索绿色产品升级的可能性。他们还制定并推广创新解决方案，以确保在整个产品生命周期中实现我们的环保理念。
我们对产品的整个生命周期进行环境影响评估，了解产品对环境的影响，为优化节能减排提供数据基础。我们与供应链合作伙伴密切合作，根据 ISO14064/14067 和 PAS2050 等标准收集与产品相关的环境数据，确保数据的真实性和准确性。我们从产品碳足迹、有害物质、产品能效、材料选择和可回收性等方面评估和披露产品生命周期对环境的影响。
根据碳足迹评估，HONOR 产品 80% 以上的碳排放量来自原材料和生产阶段。我们积极与上游供应商沟通，在生产源头寻找潜在的减排机会。我们鼓励他们使用清洁能源，制定碳减排目标和减排途径，优化高排放工艺，最大限度地减少生产过程中的碳排放。

V3 的备件不直接出售给客户，也没有合适的维修说明。不过，您还是可以直接通过Honor 对您的可折叠手机进行维修。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 再次没有 6 GHz 无线局域网

Honor Magic V3 支持快速标准 Wi-Fi 7。遗憾的是，它仍然不支持 6 GHz WLAN。结合我们的参考路由器--华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，它的传输速率相当快且稳定。

目前，我们仍在等待Honor 关于该手机支持的移动频段的反馈。一旦得到反馈，我们将立即提供相应信息。它支持的频段可能会和前代产品一样广泛。Magic V3 在大城市环境中连接良好。只是无线电强度显示并不总是很准确。它偶尔会显示我们在建筑物内接入了 5G，但实际上无法访问互联网。

Networking
Honor Magic V3
iperf3 receive AXE11000	771 (min: 387) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	919 (min: 808) MBit/s ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
iperf3 receive AXE11000	761 (min: 683) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	531 (min: 263) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	770 (min: 402) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1365 (min: 1221) MBit/s ∼83%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
iperf3 receive AXE11000	911 (min: 867) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	994 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1867 (min: 1829) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1645 (min: 811) MBit/s ∼100%
Vivo X Fold3
iperf3 receive AXE11000	946 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	980 (min: 882) MBit/s ∼66%
Honor Magic V2
iperf3 receive AXE11000	772 (min: 722) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	932 (min: 460) MBit/s ∼62%
Oppo Find N3
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1733 (min: 1600) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1495 (min: 709) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	692 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	712 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1462 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1351 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼82%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø757 (402-836)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1363 (1221-1406)

Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø756 (387-800)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø759 (683-800)

Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø919 (808-971)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø522 (263-608)

在室外，手机可以快速准确地确定位置。而在建筑物内，则需要更长的时间，而且正如预期的那样，定位不再那么准确。

我们带着 Magic V3 和Garmin Venu 2 一起骑车旅行，进行比较。在这样做的过程中，Honor 折叠式手表拥有准确的定位服务，并取得了与健身智能手表类似的效果。只有在建筑物之间导航时，V3 才会稍稍偏离我们的路线。

电话功能和通话质量

Honor Magic V3 可容纳两张 Nano SIM 卡，也可使用 eSIM 卡。支持 VoLTE 和 WLAN 通话等功能。

将手机贴在耳边时，通话质量很好，环境噪声也能得到很好的抑制。扬声器也能可靠地工作，尽管 V3 的用户听起来有些沉闷。

相机 - Magic V3 配备重新设计的三摄像头

Honor Magic V3 显示屏内的前置摄像头完全相同，分辨率均为 2000 万像素，并采用固定对焦。您最多可以以 30fps 的速度录制超高清视频。镜头有很多设置选项，性能也不错。不过，如果你想自拍，最好还是使用主摄像头，因为盖板显示屏也可用作取景器。

主摄像头不再使用 OmniVision 传感器，而是使用索尼 IMX906。它首次采用了 8 线制 SMA 快门释放装置。它结合了自动对焦和光学防抖（OIS）功能，旨在实现智能手机的纤薄外形和快 45% 的自动对焦速度。在我们的测试中，图像看起来不错，在日光下动态范围大，细节丰富。不过，在弱光环境下，你可以看出传感器并不是同类产品中最大的，因为 Magic V3 为了达到效果，需要对图像进行更长时间的曝光。与 Honor 200 Pro一样，V3 也可以使用 Harcourt 人像滤镜。

左起：手动和自动启动夜间模式拍摄的照片

此外，还安装了一个超广角镜头，也可用作微距镜头。虽然它的动态范围和分辨率都很高，但照片边缘的许多细节会变得模糊。不过，我们非常喜欢它的微距拍摄性能。

左：使用超广角镜头拍摄的微距照片，右：使用长焦镜头拍摄的微距照片

Honor 该公司还首次在可折叠智能手机中使用了潜望镜变焦技术。它具有 3.5 倍光学变焦，数字放大可达 100 倍。照片看起来不错，变焦到 10 倍时仍能提供相对不错的效果。

视频可以 720p、1,080p 或 2,160p 的分辨率录制，所有分辨率最高可达 60fps。24fps 仅用于电影模式，也可以使用 LOG。遗憾的是，可选的 21:9 格式只是 16:9 格式的裁剪图像，像素只有 3,840 x 1,644。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra-wide angle 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在可控光照条件下，Magic V3 的主摄像头显示的绿色色调和深棕色的色彩偏差略有增加，显示过于明亮，饱和度较高。

我们测试的图表图像中心部分非常锐利，显示出大量细节，而照片边缘部分的锐利度则如预期的那样有所下降，一些轮廓也略显模糊。

ColorChecker Honor Magic V3: 7.28 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 15.72 ∆E

附件和保修 -Honor 折叠机不带神来之笔

Honor Magic V3 包装盒相当大，除了折叠机本身外，还包括一个 66 瓦模块化电源（USB Type-A）、一条 USB 线缆（USB 2.0，Type-A 转 Type-C）、一个 SIM 卡工具和一个配套的包装盒。它甚至还有一个集成支架。触控笔名为Honor Magic Pen，必须单独购买。

在美国，该手机享有 12 个月的标准保修服务，不能延长保修期。

Magic V3 不带魔术笔。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特） — Magic V3 不带魔术笔。

输入设备和操作 - 两台显示屏均可使用钢笔输入

Magic V3 配备了两块电容式触摸屏，它们都能非常准确、可靠地处理输入。封面显示屏的表面更像天鹅绒般光滑，但可折叠面板的手感也非常好。

可选的Honor Magic Pen 可与两个屏幕一起使用，可快速记笔记，也可用作指点辅助工具。这支笔效果不错，但不如Galaxy Z Fold6 上的 S Pen 那样精确和反应灵敏。此外，它还具有涂鸦功能，通常可以很好地解读手写内容。

安装在电源按钮上的电容式指纹传感器负责生物识别安全--它能可靠地识别指纹并立即解锁可折叠手机。此外，你还可以通过前置摄像头进行安全性稍低的面部识别。用户自己的生物识别数据专门存储在 V3 上，并由专用的Honor S1 安全芯片保护。

线性振动电机可提供清晰易辨的触觉反馈。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 带有高频 PWM 调光功能的明亮 OLED 显示屏

Honor Magic V3 的可折叠主显示屏尺寸为 7.92 英寸，像素密度高达 402 PPI。LTPO AMOLED 可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间调节刷新率，并支持所有常用的 HDR 标准，只有 HDR Vivid 仅适用于亚洲版手机。

在显示纯白屏幕时，其亮度略高于前代产品，而在显示明暗均匀分布的区域时，屏幕中央的亮度与前代产品相近（APL18：1,009 cd/m2）。在显示 HDR 内容时，其亮度则一路攀升至 1,712 cd/m2。

为了保护用户的眼睛，Honor 采用了高频 PWM 调光，标称频率高达 3,840 Hz，而我们测量到的最低亮度值为 3,571 Hz。遗憾的是，我们也测得了 120 Hz 的低频闪烁，这可能是由于黑帧插入（BFI）作为烧机保护等原因造成的。此外，Magic V3 还具有可选的近视散焦刺激功能，据说可以在阅读书籍和观看视频时稍微减轻眼睛的压力。它通过调整内容来创造一种人工远视体验。不过，要使用这一功能，必须兼容相应的应用程序。


1026 cd/m²	1042 cd/m²	1053 cd/m²
1005 cd/m²	1019 cd/m²	1052 cd/m²
1002 cd/m²	1035 cd/m²	1051 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1053 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1031.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.35 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1019 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26

	Honor Magic V3 OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9"	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2, 2160x1856, 7.6"	Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8"	Vivo X Fold3 AMOLED, 2480x2200, 8"	Honor Magic V2 OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9"	Oppo Find N3 OLED, 2440x2268, 7.8"
Screen		-1%	15%	29%	12%	-12%
Brightness middle	1019	1396 37%	1307 28%	1793 76%	961 -6%	1283 26%
Brightness	1032	1387 34%	1308 27%	1806 75%	950 -8%	1290 25%
Brightness Distribution	95	89 -6%	96 1%	99 4%	97 2%	98 3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1	1.7 -70%	1 -0%	0.9 10%	0.8 20%	1.5 -50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.2	2.5 -14%	1.7 23%	2.1 5%	1.5 32%	3.4 -55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	1.5 12%	1.5 12%	1.6 6%	1.2 29%	2 -18%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.16 ^102%	2.24 ^98%	2.2 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6473 ^100%	6495 ^100%	6313 ^103%	6595 ^99%	6396 ^102%	6435 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 19.23 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17271 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

我们使用 Calman 来确定显示器对色彩和灰度的精确描绘程度。如果使用正常色彩模式，并将色温保持在标准值，那么 Magic V3 的色彩描绘就会非常精确。首次启动设备时，色彩模式会预设为鲜艳，此时屏幕的白平衡会调得更冷，色彩也会显得更饱和。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.656 ms rise
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.598 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.946 ms rise
2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.157 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

在室外，Honor Magic V3 的主显示屏给人留下了良好的印象，在大多数光线条件下都清晰易读。只有在阳光特别充足的日子里才会有点困难，但盖板显示屏为用户提供了一个更明亮的选择。

可折叠显示屏的视角稳定性很好。我们没有发现任何色彩变化或偏色现象，只是在非常平的视角下亮度略有下降。

封面显示屏 - 峰值亮度超过 4000 尼特

Magic V3 的外置显示屏也提供 1 - 120 Hz 的 LTPO，但亮度更高。它的亮度为 1,743 cd/^m2，是同类产品中无可争议的佼佼者，在 APL18 测量中亮度更高，达到 2,440^cd/m2。Honor ，达到了 4000 cd/^m2，而我们的测量结果是 4394^cd/m2。

Honor 此外，我们还在 PWM 调光方面更进一步，将频率提高到了 4,320 Hz，但这是否会产生进一步的效果，业内还存在争议。我们还在这里测得了额外的低频闪烁，但 360 Hz 的频率要比可折叠面板上的频率高得多。

	Honor Magic V3 OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 AMOLED, 2376x968, 6.3"	Vivo X Fold3 2748x1172, 6.5"	Honor Magic V2 OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4"	Oppo Find N3 OLED, 2484x1116, 6.3"	Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.6"
Screen
Brightness middle	1743	1363	1580	1093	1077	1020
Brightness	1775	1369	1585	1087	1083	1065
Brightness Distribution	88	94	94	96	96	84
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.9	3.3	1.5	1.4		0.9
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.1	4.5	4.1	4.1		2
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	2.3	3.4	2.7		1.2
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.06 ^107%	2.38 ^92%	2.21 ^100%		2.26 ^97%
CCT	6353 ^102%	6633 ^98%	6700 ^97%	6412 ^101%		6436 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

性能 - Magic V3 采用骁龙 8 代 3

Honor Magic V3 配备了骁龙 8 代 312GB LPDDR5x 内存。不过，它略有节流，幸好在日常使用中并不明显。即便如此，在基准测试中还是非常明显，有时还会导致性能大幅下降。如果你想充分发挥处理器的性能，可以在电池设置中激活性能模式，但这样你将不得不考虑电池运行时间的缩短。

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	2239 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1359 - 2329, n=17)	2172 Points 0%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (Performance Mode)	2170 Points
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1359 Points -37%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	2098 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	2084 Points -4%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Performance-Mode)	1960 Points -10%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1839 Points -15%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1534 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=143, last 2 years)	1361 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	6894 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4882 - 7501, n=17)	6760 Points +8%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (Performance Mode)	6279 Points
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	4882 Points -22%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	5765 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	5525 Points -12%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Performance-Mode)	5179 Points -18%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	4454 Points -29%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	4987 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=143, last 2 years)	3798 Points -40%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1390723 - 2162423, n=14)	1947837 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1685774 Points +21%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1607165 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1562239 Points +12%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1503143 Points +8%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1493877 Points +7%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1390723 Points
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 2162423, n=82, last 2 years)	1159866 Points -17%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (15343 - 21628, n=16)	18088 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	18026 Points +1%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (Performance Mode)	17917 Points
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	16056 Points -10%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	17095 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	15761 Points -12%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	14187 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 21385, n=191, last 2 years)	12476 Points -30%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	11562 Points -35%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1473 Points +50%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1259 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (983 - 1474, n=11)	1223 Points +24%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1083 Points +10%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1063 Points +8%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	983 Points
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1474, n=152, last 2 years)	851 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8165 - 10966, n=13)	10062 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	9730 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	9555 Points +14%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	8990 Points +7%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	8798 Points +5%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	8400 Points
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	8283 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11438, n=151, last 2 years)	6096 Points -27%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	15087 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8611 - 16015, n=13)	14113 Points +25%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	13749 Points +22%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	13439 Points +19%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	12736 Points +13%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	11987 Points +6%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	11279 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	9976 Points -12%
Memory
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	10626 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (7426 - 12716, n=13)	10545 Points +42%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	10351 Points +39%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	10136 Points +36%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	9455 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	9073 Points +22%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	7426 Points
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6575 Points -11%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (29938 - 39727, n=13)	35288 Points +2%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	34612 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	32352 Points -7%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	32334 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	32002 Points -8%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	27953 Points -19%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	25822 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	15988 Points -54%
Web
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	2009 Points +17%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1987 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1661 - 2145, n=13)	1976 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1882 Points +10%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1717 Points
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1680 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (747 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1541 Points -10%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1077 Points -37%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	17812 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 78964, n=145, last 2 years)	17460 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (12651 - 18370, n=13)	16721 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	15942 Points +26%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	15837 Points +25%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	14837 Points +17%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	12742 Points +1%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	12651 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (963 - 245629, n=12)	81452 Points +8358%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	24087 Points +2401%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 245629, n=128, last 2 years)	18588 Points +1830%
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	17412 Points +1708%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1199 Points +25%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	963 Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (245 - 1257, n=13, last 2 years)	515 Points +11%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (Performance Mode)	463 Points
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	326 Points -30%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Performance Mode)	447 Points -3%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	358 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (326 - 488, n=3)	426 Points -8%
Half Precision TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (247 - 1463, n=13, last 2 years)	633 Points +37%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (Performance Mode)	463 Points
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	325 Points -30%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Performance Mode)	447 Points -3%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	368 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (325 - 487, n=3)	425 Points -8%
Quantized TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (589 - 2721, n=13, last 2 years)	1367 Points +25%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (Performance Mode)	1091 Points
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	713 Points -35%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Performance Mode)	995 Points -9%
Honor Magic V2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	772 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (713 - 1128, n=3)	977 Points -10%

集成的 Adreno 750在Honor 的标准设置下，集成的 Adreno 750 图形处理器也会受到限制，但在激活性能模式后，你也可以获得其全部图形计算性能。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4693 Points +8%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4341 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3800 Points -12%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3721 Points -14%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3628 Points -16%
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3614 Points -17%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4626 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4021 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3928 Points -15%
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3737 Points -19%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3687 Points -20%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3687 Points -20%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18997 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18726 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14671 Points -23%
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14043 Points -26%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	13998 Points -26%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	13789 Points -27%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7362 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7290 Points -1%
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5379 Points -27%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	5273 Points -28%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7694 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7487 Points -3%
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5363 Points -30%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	5289 Points -31%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1503 Points +17%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1280 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Performance Mode)	1633 Points
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1549 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1386 Points -15%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	502 fps +15%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	488 fps +12%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	487 fps +11%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	437 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	398 fps -9%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	346 fps +37%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	322 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	299 fps +18%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	288 fps +14%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	253 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +98%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	113 fps +88%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	236 fps +20%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	225 fps +15%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps +13%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	213 fps +9%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	196 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	89 fps +51%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	88 fps +49%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +14%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps -10%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	136 fps +11%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	128 fps +5%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	128 fps +5%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	122 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps -1%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +31%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	63 fps +24%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51 fps
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	44 fps -14%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	43 fps -16%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	75 fps +10%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps +1%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66 fps -3%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	39 fps -43%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps +35%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	80 fps +33%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps +13%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	174 fps +1%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	173 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	153 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	133 fps -23%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	96 fps -45%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Performance Mode)	35 fps
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps -11%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash (vulkan)	31 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	27 fps -23%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	18 fps -49%

浏览器基准测试也反映了其性能的下降。不过，在运行 Jetstream 2.0 时，激活性能模式后的数值比未激活性能模式时要低。另一方面，在日常使用中，这种所谓的低性能可能不会显现出来。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)	157.504 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	155.837 Points +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=17)	153.4 Points +76%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)	140.367 Points +61%
Honor Magic V2 (Chrome 120)	132.027 Points +52%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=158, last 2 years)	111.8 Points +28%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	87.027 Points
Honor Magic V3 (Performance Mode, Chrome 128)	64.069 Points -26%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)	62.738 Points -28%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	237 runs/min +106%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)	199 runs/min +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=14)	198.7 runs/min +73%
Vivo X Fold3	182 runs/min +58%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=146, last 2 years)	120 runs/min +4%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	115 runs/min

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	15.7 runs/min +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4.3 - 16.2, n=8)	10.5 runs/min +61%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)	8.43 runs/min +29%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 16.2, n=44, last 2 years)	8.13 runs/min +25%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	6.53 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	211 Points +206%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)	183 Points +165%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=13)	158.3 Points +129%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)	158 Points +129%
Honor Magic V2 (Chrome 121)	109 Points +58%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=149, last 2 years)	106.4 Points +54%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	69 Points
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)	28 Points -59%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	66754 Points +145%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)	65418 Points +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=15)	53450 Points +96%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)	49893 Points +83%
Honor Magic V2 (Chrome 120)	47385 Points +74%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=199, last 2 years)	34633 Points +27%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	27245 Points
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)	21928 Points -20%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	2065.6 ms *
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)	1762.4 ms * +15%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=157, last 2 years)	1673 ms * +19%
Honor Magic V2 (Chrome 120)	877.9 ms * +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (606 - 2066, n=14)	864 ms * +58%
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124)	787.4 ms * +62%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)	653.8 ms * +68%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	554.57 ms * +73%

* ... smaller is better

Magic V3 采用现代 UFS 4.0 存储系统，速度始终如一。无法使用 microSD 卡扩展存储空间。

	Honor Magic V3	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6	Xiaomi Mix Fold 3	Vivo X Fold3	Oppo Find N3	Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-28%	-5%	-5%	-11%	-7%	-47%
Sequential Read 256KB	3825.59	4115.34 8%	3572.73 -7%	3556.73 -7%	3098.47 -19%	3555 ?(1851 - 4512, n=30) -7%	1729 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years) -55%
Sequential Write 256KB	3393.12	2083.25 -39%	2897.27 -15%	3076.11 -9%	2863.35 -16%	2898 ?(1524 - 3678, n=30) -15%	1338 ?(57.5 - 3875, n=194, last 2 years) -61%
Random Read 4KB	365.48	398.01 9%	389.81 7%	387.96 6%	351.92 -4%	389 ?(250 - 480, n=30) 6%	266 ?(22.2 - 543, n=194, last 2 years) -27%
Random Write 4KB	527.68	45.73 -91%	506.41 -4%	486.21 -8%	505.81 -4%	468 ?(45.7 - 709, n=30) -11%	292 ?(9.4 - 709, n=194, last 2 years) -45%

游戏 - Magic V3 上的流畅游戏

Honor Magic V3 的大显示屏非常适合玩游戏，在硬件方面也提供了理想的条件。

不过，在测试过程中，我们还是无法说服这款Honor 智能手机让我们的游戏帧数超过 60fps。特别是在《PUBG Mobile》游戏中，根据游戏中的设置，理论上它应该在最低细节级别达到 60fps，但正如我们使用GameBench 进行的测量所显示的那样，V3 无法超过这一限制。显示。

虽然《Asphalt 9：传奇》甚至为魔力 V2在《Asphalt Legends Unite》中，帧率再次降至 60fps。即便如此，这些游戏在可折叠设备上运行得非常流畅，没有引起我们的批评。

Honor Magic V3; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.3.0: Ø59.3 (50-66)

Honor Magic V3; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø58.1 (46-61)

Honor Magic V3; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.3.0: Ø39.6 (36-41)

Honor Magic V3; Diablo Immortal: Ø59.6 (36-61)

排放 - 压力测试期间存在过热风险

温度

Honor Magic V3 在负载情况下发热量很大，但这只影响到 SoC 所在的右侧。虽然表面温度不会让人感到不适，但系统肯定会发热，因为烧毁基准测试在一个多小时后就因过热风险而终止了。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，Honor Magic V3 无法长期保持其性能，但就长期性能而言，它从未与竞争对手拉开太大差距，尽管它的 SoC 有节流功能。

Max. Load

Idle


47.5 °C	48.5 °C	45.2 °C
41.4 °C	45.4 °C	38.4 °C
30.7 °C	30.7 °C	30.4 °C

Maximum: 48.5 °C
Average: 39.8 °C


42 °C	44.8 °C	45 °C
39 °C	41.1 °C	44.5 °C
39.9 °C	39.3 °C	30.4 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 40.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel stress tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	72.9 % +23%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67.2 % +14%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.2 %
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.7 % -8%
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	44.4 % -25%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	80.2 % +37%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76.9 % +31%
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.4 % +14%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.5 %
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	44 % -25%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69.7 % +20%
Honor Magic V2 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67.7 % +17%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 %
Vivo X Fold3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.6 % -1%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	71.7 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	70.5 % -2%

Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.8 (14.8-25.4)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.9 (19.3-25.1)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.5 (18.5-23.1)

Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø62.5 (50.9-85.9)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.6 (65.2-97)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø66.5 (61.2-83.9)

Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø18.9 (13.9-23.9)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø20.4 (18.9-27.1)

Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.68 (8.38-11.7)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø9.5 (9-12.8)

发言人

Honor Magic V3 的两个扬声器在中等音量下可发出悦耳的声音，但随着音量增大，声音就不那么和谐了。

USB-C 端口可用于有线音频输出，蓝牙可用于无线输出。不过，蓝牙对编解码器的支持相当有限，至少就Honor 的规格而言是如此。遗憾的是，在设置中无法读取这些信息。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor Magic V3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Honor 可折叠手机内含 5,150 毫安时电池

耗电量

Honor Magic V3 的功耗相当正常，正如我们所预期的那样，在调整显示屏亮度的测试中，由于 V3 的 SoC 被节流，其功耗低于 Fold6。

Honor 可折叠手机的线缆充电功率可达 66 瓦，无线充电功率可达 50 瓦。使用随附的电源适配器充满电需要整整一个小时，5,150 毫安时的电池在 18 分钟后已充满 50%，32 分钟后达到 80%。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.5 / 0.39 Watt
Idle	1.12 / 1.58 / 1.66 Watt
Load	5.9 / 5.94 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Honor Magic V3 5150 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 4400 mAh	Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 4800 mAh	Vivo X Fold3 5500 mAh	Honor Magic V2 5000 mAh	Oppo Find N3 4805 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-49%	-53%	-17%	-42%	-40%	-11%	-6%
Idle Minimum *	1.12	0.83 26%	0.86 23%	0.91 19%	1.31 -17%	1.16 -4%	0.822 ?(0.4 - 1.3, n=13) 27%	0.907 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=148, last 2 years) 19%
Idle Average *	1.58	1.3 18%	1.05 34%	1.61 -2%	1.99 -26%	1.8 -14%	1.155 ?(0.81 - 1.58, n=13) 27%	1.444 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=148, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Maximum *	1.66	1.44 13%	1.07 36%	1.7 -2%	2.15 -30%	1.84 -11%	1.249 ?(0.85 - 1.66, n=13) 25%	1.607 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=148, last 2 years) 3%
Load Average *	5.9	13.57 -130%	15.27 -159%	6.36 -8%	8.92 -51%	10.98 -86%	8.97 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=13) -52%	6.25 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -6%
Load Maximum *	5.94	16.03 -170%	17.78 -199%	11.26 -90%	11.05 -86%	11.1 -87%	10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=13) -82%	9.24 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -56%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.19 (1.147-8.83)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.16 (0.899-16)

Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.165 (1.029-1.585)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.932 (0.885-1.149)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen; Performance Mode: Ø5.46 (4.32-8.93)

Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.34 (4.41-8.95)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.8 (3.56-6.57)

Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.165 (1.029-1.585)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.932 (0.885-1.149)

运行时间

Honor Magic V3 的电池续航能力确实不错，在我们的所有测试场景中，这款可折叠智能手机都能提供较长的续航时间。即便如此，尽管Honor 采用了第三代硅碳技术，但竞争对手有时仍能从名义上更小的电池中榨取更多的电量。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		28h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (Foldable Screen, Chrome 128)		13h 50min
WiFi Websurfing (Cover Screen, Chrome 128)		13h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 43min

	Honor Magic V3 5150 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 4400 mAh	Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 4800 mAh	Vivo X Fold3 5500 mAh	Honor Magic V2 5000 mAh	Oppo Find N3 4805 mAh
Battery Runtime		10%	22%	-9%	-12%	4%
Reader / Idle	1692		2132 26%
H.264	1043		1371 31%
WiFi v1.3	830	913 10%	923 11%	757 -9%	727 -12%	861 4%
Load	223		270 21%

Pros

+ 明亮准确的显示屏

+ 超薄设计

+ 电池续航时间长

+ 强大的摄像头设置

+ 两个显示屏均支持手写笔

+ 防水

+ 快速充电

Cons

- 无 6 GHz 无线局域网

- 压力测试时过热

- 蓝牙音频编解码器数量少

结论 - Magic V3 在测试中给我们留下了深刻印象

Honor 在发布 Magic V3 时，再次成功地创造了一款非常出色的可折叠智能手机，其超薄设计和大量现代技术再次给人留下了深刻印象。两块显示屏均采用高频 PWM 调光技术，显示效果准确，亮度高。虽然其电池高度较低，但容量很大，不过Honor 还未能将其转化为相应的更长运行时间。

Honor Magic V3 超薄、电量大、摄像头性能好。

此外，Honor 还改正了前代产品的缺点，提供了可折叠无线充电功能和 IPX8 认证。只有 6 GHz WLAN 仍然缺失。在我们的压力测试中，V3 还出现了散热问题，但到目前为止，这在日常使用中还没有被证明是一个问题。不过，UWB 或蓝牙 LE 等现代功能仍未配备。它的更新支持期为五年，这一点很好，但三星和谷歌已经证明，更长的支持期是可能的。

Magic V3 最强劲的竞争对手是顶级产品 Galaxy Z Fold6但它的的前身也值得一试--尤其是因为它的价格。说到价格：在进行测试时，Magic V3 的价格尚未确定，因此我们会尽快补充。

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息请点击此处.

Honor Magic V3 - 2024-09-04 09/04/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

70 / 75 → 94%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

68 / 69 → 99%

Weight

88%

Battery

90%

Display

92%

Games Performance

37 / 55 → 67%

Application Performance

68 / 85 → 80%

AI Performance

86%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 85%

Camera

82%

Average

71%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
80%

Power Use
88%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
78.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 51.9%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 306 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 434458 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor Magic V3 评测--最薄的可折叠手机现在更薄了

Daniel Schmidt, 2024-09- 5 (Update: 2024-09- 5)

Honor Magic V3 评测--最薄的可折叠手机现在更薄了

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳：耐用钢铰链和 IPX8 级防护

尺寸比较

尺寸比较

连接性 - Magic V3 让人想起 V2

软件 - Magic V3 支持谷歌人工智能功能

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 再次没有 6 GHz 无线局域网

电话功能和通话质量

相机 - Magic V3 配备重新设计的三摄像头

附件和保修 -Honor 折叠机不带神来之笔

输入设备和操作 - 两台显示屏均可使用钢笔输入

显示屏 - 带有高频 PWM 调光功能的明亮 OLED 显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

封面显示屏 - 峰值亮度超过 4000 尼特

性能 - Magic V3 采用骁龙 8 代 3

游戏 - Magic V3 上的流畅游戏

排放 - 压力测试期间存在过热风险

温度

3DMark Steel stress tests

发言人

Honor Magic V3 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 audio analysis

电池续航时间 -Honor 可折叠手机内含 5,150 毫安时电池

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论 - Magic V3 在测试中给我们留下了深刻印象

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison