保时捷设计| Honor Magic6 RSR 评测--配备强劲电池的时尚豪华智能手机
Magic6 RSR 是Honor 与德国著名的保时捷设计公司合作推出的第二款智能手机。此前，他们推出了可折叠 Magic V2 RSR.
从技术角度来看，Magic6 RSR 与Honor Magic6 Pro 几乎完全相同，但它采用了更高品质的材料、独特的设计和更大的存储空间。在保时捷的世界里，其名称中的后缀 RSR 代表RennSport 赛车 ，用于纯粹的竞赛版车辆，这些车辆不具备上路许可。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Honor Magic6 RSR SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 237 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" | 2800x1280 | |
| 91.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750 | 232 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" | 3120x1440 | |
| 89.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Xiaomi 14 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 219.8 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.73" | 3200x1440 | |
| 91.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU | 221 g | 256 GB NVMe | 6.70" | 2796x1290 |
外壳和连接 - Magic6 RSR 配备纳米水晶护盾和钛金属元件
保时捷设计| Honor Magic6 RSR 有玛瑙灰和冰冻浆果两种颜色可供选择，在我们的测试过程中，它被证明制作精良。其引人注目的外观让人立刻联想到 Magic V2 RSR 的设计语言。已经贴上的屏幕保护膜可以轻松取下，这大大改善了触摸屏的顺滑感。
尽管与 Magic6 Pro 相比，RSR 的重量更大，但握持起来非常舒适。背面和边框上的指纹清晰可见，但附带的皮革外观保护盖可以解决这个问题。显示屏由Honor 的 NanoCrystal Shield 保护，智能手机符合 IP68 防尘防水标准。六角形摄像头模块由时尚的钛金属边框环绕，非常抢眼。
其技术特点与 Magic6 Pro.只是其内存更为宽裕，配备 24GB RAM 和 1,024GB 内部存储空间。手机的供货范围也大大扩展。除智能手机外，还包括两个电源适配器（一个带 Type-C 接口，一个带 Type-G 接口）、两条 USB 数据线（USB 2.0、Type-A 转 Type-C）、一个时尚的保时捷 SIM 卡工具和前面提到的人造皮革保护套（内层为织物包裹）。
通信、软件和操作
由于保时捷设计| Honor Magic6 RSR 广泛支持蜂窝频率，因此在地球上任何地方建立连接都不成问题。它的无线局域网支持 Wi-Fi 7，但不支持现代的 6 GHz 频段。其电话功能与 Magic6 Pro在日常使用中，我们是它们的忠实粉丝。
谷歌Android 14 被用作手机操作系统，Honor 在其上安装了自己的 MagicOS 8.0。在 Pro 机型上熟悉的功能，如 Magic Capsule 和 Magic Portal，也一并搭载。RSR 将提供为期五年的安全补丁（每月推出一次），并将接受四次版本升级（最高至Android 18）。在测试时，其安全更新和 Play 系统更新都是截至 2024 年 4 月 1 日的最新版本。
该设备的线性振动电机可提供清晰、实在的触觉反馈，而且声音不大。Magic6 RSR 还支持指关节手势、单手模式、无触摸手势等。生物识别安全由光学指纹传感器负责，识别率高且速度快。此外，还可以通过前置摄像头和邻近的 ToF 传感器进行 3D 面部识别，在速度和安全性方面无需做出任何妥协。
| Networking | |
| Honor Magic6 RSR | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi 14 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
相机 - 高像素，效果出众
保时捷设计| Honor Magic6 RSR 的摄像头设置与 Magic6 Pro相同，我们的评价也同样积极。它的前置摄像头采用 50 万像素传感器，通过像素二进制技术生成 1200 万像素的照片，而视频只能以 30fps 的超高清速度录制。
背面有两个 5000 万像素传感器，另一个分辨率为 180 万像素。后者是变焦镜头，可实现 2.5 倍光学放大和 100 倍数字放大，并具有光学防抖（OIS）功能。使用该镜头可录制高达 60fps 的超高清视频。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain camera5x zoom5x zoomLow light
显示屏 - 配备双层 OLED 的 Magic6 RSR
在其数据表上，保时捷设计| Honor Magic6 RSR 的显示屏与 Magic6 Pro-除了一个小细节：新的双层 OLED 技术（我们曾报道过）。我们报道过).Honor 选择了后者，并声称显示屏的使用寿命是传统 OLED 面板的七倍。这一功能以前只有 Magic6 Ultimate 才具备。
它的亮度与 Magic6 Pro 相当，只有在显示 Ultra HDR 照片时才能达到指定的峰值亮度，即高达 5,000 cd/m²。为了保护眼睛，Honor 采用了高达 4320 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光。在最低亮度下，我们测得的闪烁频率为 360 Hz，但幅度相当平缓。这可能是由于黑帧插入（BFI）造成的，该技术用于减少运动模糊和保护老化。我们认为，因显示屏闪烁而引起投诉的可能性不大。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 1575 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Honor Magic6 RSR OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8" | Xiaomi 14 Ultra AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Super Retina XDR Display, OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -20% | -17% | 6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.38 ? | 3.8 ? -60% | 1.55 ? 35% | 1.58 ? 34% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.07 ? | 1.41 ? -32% | 1.26 ? -18% | 0.88 ? 18% |
| PWM Frequency | 360 | 480 33% | 120 -67% | 240 -33% |
| Screen | -27% | -3% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 1575 | 1317 -16% | 997 -37% | 1102 -30% |
| Brightness | 1508 | 1365 -9% | 1002 -34% | 1102 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 94 6% | 96 8% | 98 10% |
| Black Level * | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 3.4 -100% | 1.6 6% | 1.1 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.9 | 5 -28% | 3.3 15% | 3.1 21% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.8 -17% | 1.8 25% | 1.6 33% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2 110% | 2.19 100% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6398 102% | 6458 101% | 6493 100% | 6555 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-25% | -10% /
-7% | 7% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.07 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5295 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.539 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.291 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.085 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 360 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。
性能、排放和电池寿命
保时捷设计| Honor Magic6 RSR 搭载速度极快的 骁龙 8 代 3和 24GB LPDDR5x 内存。其系统性能也相应较高。不过，在压力测试中，其性能急剧下降，Honor ，确实需要提供更高效的散热。
手机的两个扬声器提供了良好的声音背景，是智能手机中较好的扬声器之一。即使是低音调也很容易听到，只有在全音量时声音才会变得有点刺耳。
第二代硅碳电池容量为 5,600 mAh，为 Magic6 RSR 带来了超长的续航时间。快速充电（有线高达 80 瓦，无线高达 66 瓦）意味着Honor 智能手机可在 51 分钟内再次充满电。
| Honor Magic6 RSR | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | Xiaomi 14 Ultra | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Average 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -30% | -10% | -69% | -7% | -50% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 3631.39 | 3610.25 -1% | 4102.56 13% | 1501.13 -59% | 3597 ? -1% | 1867 ? -49% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 3875.03 | 1893.63 -51% | 3095.36 -20% | 257.28 -93% | 3399 ? -12% | 1451 ? -63% |
| Random Read 4KB | 415 | 437.12 5% | 362.88 -13% | 156.16 -62% | 402 ? -3% | 279 ? -33% |
| Random Write 4KB | 662.63 | 181.55 -73% | 527.15 -20% | 258.92 -61% | 579 ? -13% | 311 ? -53% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
发言人
Honor Magic6 RSR audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
运行时间
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Honor Magic6 RSR | |
| Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 14 Ultra | |
Pros
Cons
评价 - 拥有大量存储空间的时尚 Magic6 RSR
Porsche Design| Honor Magic6 RSR 具备 Magic6 Pro 的所有功能，如强大的摄像头设置、超长的电池续航时间和全面的功能，而且设计抢眼，供货范围宽广。
Magic6 RSR 是Honor 与保时捷设计公司成功合作的又一力作。
从技术角度看，其双层 OLED 面板是一项创新，可显著延长显示屏的电池寿命。这款手机还配备了更大的存储空间。但遗憾的是，其姊妹机型的技术缺陷依然存在。这是否能证明 600 美元的附加费是合理的，这可能取决于你的品味和钱包。无论如何，Magic6 RSR 都是一款非常出色的智能手机。
如果你喜欢保时捷设计的外观，但更喜欢使用可折叠手机，那么你应该仔细看看 Magic V2 RSR.另外，还有 Galaxy S24 Ultra(MRSP：1,659.99 美元）和 iPhone 15 Pro Max(MRSP：1,599 美元）都有 1 TB 版本，价格相近。
价格和供应情况
目前，Magic6 RSR 还不能在美国购买。不过，您可以从亚马逊购买它的姊妹机型 Magic6 Pro。
Honor Magic6 RSR
- 05/21/2024 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
