Notebookcheck Logo

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max评测。一款巨大的、强壮的智能手机

一块砖。

最大的Apple 智能手机笨重，但提供了一个超亮的6.7英寸LTPO显示屏，一个快速的处理器，最重要的是，它的电池比较小的Pro型号大得多，但使用相同的48MP三摄像头。阅读我们的评论，了解这是否证明了高昂的附加费用是合理的。
5G Apple iOS iPhone Touchscreen Smartphone

Apple最大的智能手机现在也加入了这个行列，对去年久经考验的概念没有带来任何改变。iPhone 13 Pro Max。与较小的 iPhone 14 Pro,更大的显示屏是关注的重点。然而，与前几年不同的是，现在的相机是相同的，没有小的好处在Max中实现。

Apple 巨大模型的价格也大大增加，现在最小的存储配置（128GB）起价为1449欧元（1099美元），1TB的价格可高达2099欧元（1599美元）。对我们来说，为一个更大的显示屏多花100美元似乎太贵了。在下面的评论中，我们将了解iPhone 14 Pro Max的性能。

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (iPhone Series)
Processor
Apple A16 Bionic 6 x 2 - 3.5 GHz, Crete
Graphics adapter
Apple A16 GPU 5-Core
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2796 x 1290 pixel 460 PPI, Capacitive, Super Retina XDR OLED, Dynamic Island, Always-On, Wide color (P3), Haptic Touch, ProMotion, DolbyVision, Fingerprint-resistant oleophobic coating, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Firewire, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: Lightning, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Barometer, High dynamic range gyro, High-g accelerometer, Proximity sensor, Lightning, U1-UWB
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900), 3G (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 53, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.85 x 160.7 x 77.6
Battery
16.68 Wh, 4323 mAh Lithium-Ion, Up to 50% charge in 30 minutes with 20W adapter or higher
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iOS 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (24 mm, f/1.78, 2nd Gen. sensor‑shift optical image stabilization, 7‑element lens, 4K video) + 12 MPix (77 mm, f/2.8, 3x optical zoom range) + 12 MPix (48 mm, f/1.78, 7‑element lens) + LiDAR-Sensor
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (23 mm, f/1.9, autofocus) + Face ID
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, Cabel (Lightning to USB-C), Sticker, 12 Months Warranty, Dual-GNSS: Gps, Glonass, QZSS, BeiDou, Galileo; Emergency SOS via satellite, Crash Detection, fanless, waterproof
Weight
240 g
Price
1449 Euro
Links
Apple homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
90.3 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core		240 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920		228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440
89.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		198.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
88.5 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Vivo X80 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"3200x1440
88.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Honor Magic4 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"2848x1312
89.2 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20		210 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3120x1440

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max看起来很庞大，即使是将另一部具有类似尺寸显示屏的智能手机与之放在一起。240克的沉重重量进一步加深了这种印象，Apple ，甚至敢于在天平上再加两克。然而，这款智能手机在手中的感觉很好，因为尽管它的重量很高，但它并不太头重脚轻。

做工很好。缝隙均匀且非常紧密，触觉也很好。正面和背面都有耐用的玻璃保护，边框是由高度抛光的不锈钢制成。正面的玻璃极易沾染指纹，而我们的金色型号的哑光背面的指纹则几乎看不到。扭转刚性很好，但在试图扭转iPhone的过程中，iPhone内部有一些可听到的吱吱声。

这是自iPhone XApple ，免去了缺口，取而代之的是一个双冲孔的解决方案，被称为动态岛。这是一个动画软件扩展，它将凹槽围在显示屏中，并将其作为信息和输入面。Apple 智能手机通过了IP68认证，即防尘和防水，而且电池是永久安装的。iPhone 14 Pro Max有深紫色、金色、银色和太空黑。

我们在iFixit的同事的同事已经拆解了Pro Max，并给它打了一个不错的分数（6/10），然而，这比小机型要差，因为它还没有利用改进后的内部设计。Apple ，在其网站，提供了一份可持续性报告。.

尺寸比较

❌
164.57 mm 75.3 mm 9.1 mm 215 g163.9 mm 75.9 mm 8.9 mm 210 g163.6 mm 74.7 mm 9.15 mm 215 g163.3 mm 77.9 mm 8.9 mm 228 g161.76 mm 73.5 mm 8.39 mm 198.5 g160.7 mm 77.6 mm 7.85 mm 240 g160.8 mm 78.1 mm 7.7 mm 238 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - iPhone 14 Pro Max继续使用Lightning

iPhone 14 Pro Max的存储配置与去年的型号相同。你可以从中选择。

  • 128GB的价格为1099美元
  • 256GB为1199美元
  • 512GB为1399美元
  • 1TB的价格为1599美元

这意味着Max机型的价格也明显变高了。著名的Lightning 连接器再次作为物理接口提供，它不支持高传输速率，但支持广泛的可选适配器组合。蓝牙5.3、MagSafe和NFC也在其中。

顶端
顶端
左边：SIM卡、音量摇杆、静音按钮
左边：SIM卡、音量摇杆、静音按钮
对。权力
对。权力
底部：扬声器，Lightning ，麦克风
底部：扬声器，Lightning ，麦克风

软件--动态岛是iOS 16的核心

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max配备了Apple'的iOS 16系统，首次实现了动态岛和始终显示（AOD）功能。前者是一种软件解决方案，可以隐藏打孔，并以紧凑、光学的方式显示运行中的应用程序的信息。在日常使用中，我们非常喜欢这个功能，觉得它特别实用。到目前为止，该功能主要限于Apple"自己的应用程序，但该界面也对其他应用程序开发者开放。iPhone也有一个可以定制的AOD。没有什么突破性的，但它相当有用，而且实现得非常好。

你可以在这里阅读iOS 16的所有新功能https://www.apple.com/de/ios/ios-16/ 。在截图中，如果动态岛没有被激活，打孔就会被隐藏。

锁屏可以自定义
主屏幕上有活动的动态岛
动态岛可以被扩展。
快速访问

通信和GNSS - 定位良好，但仍然没有Wi-Fi 6E

AppleiPhone 14 Pro Max具有现代移动标准和广泛的频率覆盖，因此在全球范围内连接应该是没有任何问题。然而，快速的5G mmWave标准仍然专门保留给美国的机型，同样适用于通过卫星的紧急呼叫功能（在审查时）。

Wi-Fi 6可用于无线局域网。iPhone不支持更新的6E标准，这意味着它不能使用6GHz网络。相反，它必须使用较慢和较频繁的2.4和5.0GHz频段。与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器一起，我们登记了非常稳定的数据传输，但它们在速度方面与预期有些差距，特别是在接收时。

Networking
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 643) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
817 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
716 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
521 (min: 311) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1704 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1702 (min: 1642) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
881 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
839 (min: 531) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1657 (min: 1379) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1522 (min: 1278) MBit/s ∼89%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1383 (min: 1126) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1328 (min: 378) MBit/s ∼78%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1369 (min: 720) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1499 (min: 1195) MBit/s ∼88%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1736 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1710 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 transmit AX12
875 (min: 836) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
718 (min: 707) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼80%
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1657 (1379-1781)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1278-1606)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic, Apple A16 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø723 (643-737)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø865 (446-922)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic, Apple A16 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø817 (751-852)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø839 (531-913)

iPhone 14 Pro Max使用所有全球卫星导航系统，包括用于定位的双频功能。因此，即使在室内，定位也是非常快速和精确的。

在一次短途自行车旅行中，我们将Apple 智能手机与Garmin Venu 2 。无论是在细节上还是在路线的总长度上，偏差都很小，尽管iPhone的性能很稳定，但智能手表还是更精确一点。

GNSS试骑：环湖航行
GNSS试骑：环湖航行
GNSS试骑：循环
GNSS试骑：循环
GNSS试骑：总结
GNSS试骑：总结

电话和语音质量

当拿在耳边时，Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max的语音质量非常自然，噪音抑制效果也不错，但在大的背景噪音中达到了极限，偶尔会让干扰性的声音溜进来。

在安静的环境中，该扬声器可以很好地使用。它不会产生混响，但会使用户的声音更安静一些。尽管如此，麦克风的范围还是不错的，尽管不时可以注意到轻微的干扰，特别是在近距离。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话等重要功能。在我们的审查样本中，可以使用一个纳米SIM卡。电子SIM卡也可作为替代。

照相机--iPhone 14 Pro Max中强大的三合一相机

用iPhone 14 Pro Max的肖像模式自拍
用iPhone 14 Pro Max的肖像模式自拍

Apple's iPhone 14 Pro Max的前置摄像头在几年后进行了升级，现在使用的是自动对焦，并且在名义上更加感光，光圈为f/1.9。有了它，即使在昏暗的光线下，你也能拍出好的自拍。

背面的三摄像头与iPhone 14 Pro ，我们在相应的评论中进一步详细讨论。新的4800万像素传感器提供了高水平的细节和平衡的图像合成。此外，带有第二代传感器移位稳定功能的光学图像稳定系统确保了手感更加稳定。一些用户报告了在HDR情况下的错误，但到目前为止我们还没有遇到这个问题。


2倍变焦是在主传感器上以数字方式进行的，但它的工作做得非常好。在光学上，有三倍的放大率，可以利用传统的OIS。超广角再次充当微距镜头。与主镜头的颜色偏差没有前代产品那么大，但仍然可见。

在摄像方面，Apple ，对Cinema模式进行了微调和扩展，现在终于可以以30FPS的速度录制超高清。ProRes也再次可用，但只能在我们的128GB评测模型上以1,080p和30FPS（29MB/s）有限地使用。全4k/30 FPS（100 MB/s）或全高清60 FPS（59 MB/s）可在我们的小型256 GB Pro上使用。然而，由于数据量大，这个决定是很容易理解的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light

Apple"的iPhone 14 Pro Max的相机在受控的照明条件下也表现得足够好。然而，ColorChecker中的结果并不那么无懈可击，在绿色调中显示出与目标的相当高的偏差。我们的测试图的图像非常平衡，甚至精细的细节在图像的中心仍然可见。

ColorChecker
11.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max: 9.4 ∆E min: 2.94 - max: 16.43 ∆E
ColorChecker
21.3 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
16 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
24 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
22 ∆E
27 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max: 21.57 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 31.37 ∆E

配件和保修 - Care+变得更加昂贵

Apple 关怀+
Apple 关怀+

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max的交货范围和往常一样，仍然很简陋，只包括一条USB-C到Lightning ，一个SIM卡工具，一张贴纸，快速入门指南和保修信息。Apple而另一方面，苹果公司提供了大量的配件，其中配套的电源适配器当然是最重要的一个，但也延伸到了外壳、MagSafe配件和更多。

12个月的严格保修期可以通过Care+保险包来延长，可以直接购买两年的一次性付款或按月支付。后者的价格略高，但也可以运行两年以上的时间。总的来说，该套餐现在更贵，但每年的意外损坏索赔现在不再受到限制。

输入设备和操作 - 最大空间

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max的大型电容式触摸屏比小型的Pro型号提供了更多的空间，从而提供了更好的概述。滑动性能很好，输入的实现也很迅速和准确。

Apple'的键盘布局现在也支持语音输入，作为一种平行输入法。那些喜欢使用不同键盘的人可以从应用程序商店获得一个。Face ID再次专门负责生物识别安全。这是一种三维面部识别，不仅被认为是非常安全的，而且工作迅速而可靠。

单手模式在出厂前就已经激活，只需在显示屏下边缘轻轻一扫就可以进行。背部的敲击手势也再次出现，并且仍然区分双击和三击，它们可以触发不同的动作，必须事先在设置中进行配置。

显示屏 - iPhone采用超亮的120Hz LTPO OLED

子像素网格
子像素网格

iPhone 14 Pro Max的6.7英寸超级视网膜XDR OLED显示屏的分辨率为2796 x 1290，动态刷新率为1至120赫兹。亮度与前代产品相当，关于带有激活环境光传感器的纯白色显示屏，平均亮度为1057cd/m²。在亮区和暗区的均匀分布中，甚至可以达到2361 cd/m²（APL18），这甚至超过了Apple （2000 cd/m²）的规定。那些喜欢手动调节亮度的人，有高达855 cd/m²的亮度可供他们使用。

iPhone的ProMotion显示屏也显示出OLED典型的闪烁，但在最低显示亮度下，曲线相当平滑，频率稳定在240赫兹。如果将其提高到39%以上，频率就会上升到恒定的480赫兹，这与高频直流调光相当。因此，敏感人群的负担应该更低。没有确定的时间抖动，我们通过用显微镜和240 FPS的慢动作视频（深灰色，全亮度）检查显示器。

1057
cd/m²		1054
cd/m²		1057
cd/m²
1053
cd/m²		1061
cd/m²		1061
cd/m²
1060
cd/m²		1050
cd/m²		1062
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1062 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1057.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1061 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.8"		Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Vivo X80 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.8"		Honor Magic4 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"		Google Pixel 6 Pro
LTPO-OLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"		Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
OLED, 2778x1284, 6.7"
Screen
11%
-2%
11%
-47%
3%
22%
Brightness middle
1061
1077
2%
1020
-4%
938
-12%
956
-10%
794
-25%
1049
-1%
Brightness
1057
1093
3%
1020
-4%
947
-10%
959
-9%
801
-24%
1060
0%
Brightness Distribution
99
97
-2%
96
-3%
97
-2%
94
-5%
97
-2%
98
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.2
8%
1
23%
0.9
31%
2.4
-85%
0.9
31%
0.78
40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.1
2
35%
2.8
10%
1.9
39%
5.2
-68%
2.2
29%
1.72
45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.3
19%
2.1
-31%
1.3
19%
3.3
-106%
1.5
6%
0.8
50%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.37 93%
2.29 96%
2.2 100%
2.26 97%
2.23 99%
2.181 101%
CCT
6511 100%
6526 100%
6502 100%
6518 100%
6804 96%
6654 98%
6559 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.9 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

关于色彩表现的准确性，Apple ，不会乱来：这显示了高度的准确性，有一个良好的白平衡。只有在省略了True Tone模式的情况下才能达到这个效果。否则，显示仍然非常准确，但有点温暖。

灰度（真实色调：禁用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
灰度（真实色调：禁用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
颜色（真实色调：禁用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
颜色（真实色调：禁用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
色彩空间（真实色调：禁用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
色彩空间（真实色调：禁用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
饱和度（真实色调：禁用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
饱和度（真实色调：禁用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.73 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3505 ms rise
↘ 0.3795 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9985 ms rise
↘ 0.8905 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

iPhone 14 Pro Max在户外的表现特别好。这主要是由于峰值亮度高，确保显示屏在任何光线下都非常清晰。环境光传感器也能对不断变化的光线情况作出快速和适当的反应。

在秋天的阳光下
在秋天的阳光下
在阴凉处
在阴凉处

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max的可视角度稳定性非常好，在平视角度下只显示出轻微的亮度损失；主观上感觉不到色雾的存在。

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max的可视角度稳定性
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max的可视角度稳定性

性能 -Apple's A16 Bionic提供了大量的动力

128GB版本的存储速度
128 GB
256GB版本的存储速度
256 GB

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max由Apple A16 Bionic ，它能够利用6GB的LPDDR5工作内存。在CPU性能方面，该SoC很容易超过组装的Android 竞争对手。

在系统基准测试中，领先优势并不总是那么明显。iPhone产生了明显的性能优势，在Crossmark中多出20%的分数，但却落在了Edge 30 Ultra在AnTuTu中的表现。

存储速度与前代产品处于相似的水平，但值得注意的是，128GB的变体比较大的型号要慢，这可能是由于最小的型号只使用了一个存储模块。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | CrossMark | AImark | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1885 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (1878 - 1885, n=4)
1882 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1742 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1328 Points -30%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1234 Points -35%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1226 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points -39%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
1057 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5533 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (4688 - 5538, n=4)
5273 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4914 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4251 Points -23%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3685 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points -36%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3377 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points -40%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
2941 Points -47%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1073804 Points +13%
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (949107 - 1373449, n=4)
1066574 Points +12%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
949107 Points
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
944782 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
940036 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
800222 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points -16%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
720905 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1329 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (1260 - 1332, n=3)
1307 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1103 Points -17%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1079 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
942 Points -29%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
906 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points -33%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
879 Points -34%
AImark - Score v2.x
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
107460 Points +182%
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (38169 - 38930, n=2)
38550 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
38169 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6602 Points -83%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6355 Points -83%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6217 Points -84%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6034 Points -84%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
5782 Points -85%
Geekbench ML
0.5 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2540 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (2207 - 2540, n=3)
2423 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2186 Points -14%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1913 Points -25%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1881 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (474 - 2842, n=12, last 2 years)
1673 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
842 Points -67%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (1016 - 1135, n=3)
1065 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1016 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (215 - 1418, n=12, last 2 years)
598 Points -41%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
568 Points -44%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
441 Points -57%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
398 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
334 Points -67%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (3170 - 3377, n=4)
3235 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3204 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
2056 Points -36%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1662 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (344 - 3638, n=10, last 2 years)
1269 Points -60%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
619 Points -81%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
402 Points -87%

该 A16-GPU据说与前代产品相比性能提高了19%，这在基准测试中只得到部分证实。尽管如此，它是智能手机中最快的GPU，而 Adreno 730只是很少能追上它，但在现代测试中保持相当接近。

在屏幕测试中出现了一个完全不同的画面，iPhone经常落后于竞争对手。然而，这是因为在Apple 智能手机的测试中，帧率的上限是60 FPS，而Android 智能手机通常可以达到全刷新率。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3196 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2817 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2768 Points -13%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2585 Points -19%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2456 Points -23%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1998 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1916 Points -40%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3365 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
3080 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2796 Points -17%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2639 Points -22%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2044 Points -39%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1973 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
12367 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
11688 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10982 Points -11%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10317 Points -17%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10151 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points -41%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7057 Points -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +140%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +97%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +68%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
456 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
455 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
439 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
409.6 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -34%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
267 fps -41%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
125 fps -73%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +140%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +92%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +80%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +8%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
289 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
227.9 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps -35%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps -37%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
147 fps -49%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -69%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
187 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps -4%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps -19%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
144 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps -32%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps -47%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +48%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
53.2 fps -11%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -35%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -50%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
98 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
92.9 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -31%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -49%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +26%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
54.8 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
54 fps
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -4%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -17%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +27%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +12%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
41 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
37.9 fps -8%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps -17%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -27%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps +73%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +12%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.1 fps -1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -30%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
133 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -11%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
108 fps -19%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps -35%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -49%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
23 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -4%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -35%

Basemark GPUScore

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø46.1 (27.6-58.5)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø28.2 (11-165.1)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø41 (19.8-57.3)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø34.9 (11.5-146)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 2560x1440 Official VRS; 1.0.0 : Ø29.9 (10.3-135.7)

在浏览器基准测试中，iPhone 14 Pro Max独领风骚，将其竞争对手甩在身后。然而，从主观上看，差异并不大。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
278.979 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic (228 - 282, n=4)
262 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
181.8 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points -57%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
117.894 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points -65%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)
91.7 Points -67%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
77.337 Points -72%
Vivo X80 Pro
72.786 Points -74%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Apple A16 Bionic (327 - 419, n=4)
373 runs/min +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
371 runs/min
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
242 runs/min -35%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min -63%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)
111 runs/min -70%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min -71%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
99.2 runs/min -73%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
87.9 runs/min -76%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
65.5 runs/min -82%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Apple A16 Bionic (201 - 202, n=2)
202 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
201 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points -43%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
101 Points -50%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
71 Points -65%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
288 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic (286 - 292, n=4)
288 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
248 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points -48%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
145 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
124 Points -57%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)
105 Points -64%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
101 Points -65%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
79 Points -73%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Apple A16 Bionic (68554 - 75718, n=4)
72639 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
72024 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
63831 Points -11%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
44631 Points -38%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)
44034 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points -48%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
37098 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points -53%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
27730 Points -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -234%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
1440.1 ms * -206%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms * -168%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
1240.1 ms * -164%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
1104 ms * -135%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)
915 ms * -95%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (450 - 506, n=4)
475 ms * -1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
469.9 ms *
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
414.8 ms * +12%

* ... smaller is better

游戏 - 更大的显示屏=更多的乐趣

ǞǞǞ A16-GPU为App Store中的所有游戏和未来几年的游戏提供了足够的动力。相比之下，大显示屏是真正的附加值。 iPhone 14 Pro时的真正附加值，因为额外的显示区域不应该被低估。

不幸的是，我们目前无法提出任何游戏基准，因为我们的合作伙伴GameBench ，还不支持新的iOS版本。然而，我们将在未来几天内尽快做到这一点。

排放--iPhone 14 Pro Max比小号Pro更暖和

温度

iPhone 14 Pro Max在空转时表面温度比iPhone 14 Pro 。在长时间的负载下会发热，最高可达44℃，这已经不属于令人愉快的范畴，但仍然无害。

iPhone 14 Pro Max在名义上比小号的14 Pro性能更稳定，这是因为它以较低的基本帧率开始3DMark Wild Life压力测试的事实。事实上，它在20次运行结束时甚至有点慢，只比它的前辈多实现了三帧前辈.

Max. Load
 36.9 °C39.1 °C36 °C 
 40.4 °C41.4 °C36.5 °C 
 41.4 °C40.4 °C36.9 °C 
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 38.8 °C
36.5 °C41 °C39.9 °C
36.2 °C40.9 °C44 °C
37.1 °C36.7 °C43.5 °C
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 39.5 °C
Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
80.1 %
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.1 % -15%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.3 % -18%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 % -27%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43.4 % -46%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.3 % +10%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
66.7 %
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.1 % -5%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.6 % -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 % -7%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 % -34%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø14.4 (13.4-20.1)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø9.2 (7.76-12.6)
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø11.1 (9.89-15.8)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø50.6 (47.5-59.3)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (25.9-44.2)
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.7 (38.3-58.6)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø55.3 (50.8-74)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø32.3 (26.8-43.4)

发言人

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max的两个扬声器提供了相当好的声音输出，与前代相比有了改进。前代产品特别是在高音的线性方面，中低音也变得更加有力。

有线耳机可以通过Lightning 端口与智能手机连接。也可以通过蓝牙进行无线连接，但iPhone并不支持特别广泛的音频编解码。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.644.32535.230.33132.627.9402929.75037.438.16330.631.68029.333.210026.736.612524.34616022.556.220018.85525016.258.53151258.94009.960.750011.767.863010.368.580011.970.310001272125012.175.616001276.3200012.180.1250012.779.6315012.779.5400012.978.2500013.378.2630013.276.5800013.674.61000013.6751250013.371.41600012.760.3SPL25.189N0.776median 12.7median 72Delta28.737.435.92829.732.624.327.727.13435.62722.823.619.422.327.517.738.816.148.312.852.513.156.51256959.51166.410.767.610.373.310.972.212.169.511.869.71263.711.863.611.965.112.974.713.379.613.476.613.570.613.664.114.86914.164.624.684.60.658.7median 12.8median 65.11.26.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone 14 Pro MaxGoogle Pixel 6 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 6 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 续航时间长，充电慢

消耗功率

iPhone 14 Pro Max的耗电量已经得到改善，这不适用于快速充电选项。使用20瓦电源适配器的人应该能够在30分钟内将电池充电到50%，尽管电池更大，但这与小号Pro的速度一样。Android 智能手机的速度要快得多。该Honor Magic4 Pro例如，100瓦的电池可以在20分钟内完全充电。

另外，Apple 智能手机可以在MagSafe充电板上以15瓦特充电，或在兼容Qi的充电表面以7.5瓦特充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.92 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.7 / 1.73 Watt
Load midlight 3.85 / 5.94 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
4323 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh		Vivo X80 Pro
4700 mAh		Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh		Google Pixel 6 Pro
5003 mAh		Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
4352 mAh		Average Apple A16 Bionic
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-16%
3%
-29%
-30%
-16%
10%
-9%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.58
5%
0.74
-21%
0.92
-51%
0.87
-43%
0.7
-15%
0.6
2%
0.695 ?(0.56 - 0.9, n=4)
-14%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
-47%
Idle Average *
1.7
0.71
58%
1.84
-8%
2.04
-20%
2.04
-20%
1
41%
1.5
12%
1.54 ?(1 - 2.09, n=4)
9%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Maximum *
1.73
1.16
33%
1.86
-8%
2.05
-18%
2.26
-31%
1.04
40%
1.6
8%
1.59 ?(1.1 - 2.11, n=4)
8%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
7%
Load Average *
3.85
7.07
-84%
2.75
29%
4.29
-11%
4.97
-29%
6.87
-78%
3.5
9%
4.4 ?(3.42 - 6, n=4)
-14%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-68%
Load Maximum *
5.94
11.32
-91%
4.54
24%
8.75
-47%
7.46
-26%
9.87
-66%
4.8
19%
7.84 ?(5.56 - 13.6, n=4)
-32%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
-65%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic: Ø3.66 (0.567-6.04)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø5.26 (0.911-12.7)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.86 (5.44-5.95)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.2 (10-12.2)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.864 (0.672-1.008)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.09 (1.021-1.371)

电池寿命

电池运行时间明显长于小型Pro型号。小型专业机型，而整个比较领域在这方面也无法跟上。但运行时间并不一定比小号的Pro Max好。 13 Pro Max。特别是，在固定显示亮度（150cd/m²）的情况下，现实的WLAN测试比较弱，据此，略低于16小时的结果仍然是一个非常好的结果。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
57h 53min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 16)
15h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
28h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 56min
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
4323 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh		Vivo X80 Pro
4700 mAh		Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh		Google Pixel 6 Pro
5003 mAh		Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
4352 mAh
Battery Runtime
-23%
-24%
-35%
-34%
-30%
-2%
Reader / Idle
3473
1973
-43%
2206
-36%
1728
-50%
1346
-61%
2846
-18%
H.264
1688
1078
-36%
1188
-30%
943
-44%
995
-41%
1522
-10%
WiFi v1.3
948
844
-11%
872
-8%
852
-10%
687
-28%
667
-30%
1067
13%
Load
416
410
-1%
323
-22%
272
-35%
389
-6%
452
9%

Pros

+ 大型、超亮和最精确的 120 Hz 显示屏
+ 非常好的电池寿命
+ 强大的SoC
+ 良好的摄像头设置
+ 精确的定位
+ 长时间的更新供应

Cons

- 沉重的美国以外没有毫米波
- 美国以外没有毫米波
- 美国以外没有毫米波
- 噪声消除功能较弱的电话
- 对蓝牙的音频编解码器支持不足
- 只有12个月的保修期

结论 - 更多的运行时间和更大的面板

回顾：Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
回顾：Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max与它的小兄弟14 Pro非常相似，只是更大、更重。在我们的测试中，显示屏甚至变得更亮一些，但SoC的速度稍慢一些。无论怎样，这两个差异都是微不足道的，在日常使用中不会起作用。新功能也是一样的，包括动态岛，以及带有4800万像素传感器的新三摄。

Apple

iPhone 14 Pro Max是一款大块头的智能手机，适合那些想拥有大显示屏和更多电池寿命的人。

因此，如果你想要尽可能大的显示屏，你可以毫不犹豫地选择Max。除了重量较重外，没有任何缺点。甚至电池运行时间也更长，因为特大号的iPhone为更大的电池提供了空间。然而，电池的性能提升与更长的电池运行时间成正比。如果我们的计算是正确的，这些应该高出35%左右，但实际情况并非如此。在我们的测试中，收益在17%和31%之间变化。高功率损耗可能部分地解释了负载下较高的表面温度。但是，即使收益率不理想，运行时间仍然非常好。

那些喜欢更紧凑的智能手机的人应该看一下iPhone 14 Pro.在Apple 外，还有 奥普Find X5 Pro, Vivo X80 Pro或 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra都是强有力的替代品。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

iPhone 14 Pro Max的所有颜色和存储版本都可以直接从...Apple.该型号通常也可以通过亚马逊或其他流行的零售商购买，这取决于你所在的国家，而且往往会更便宜一些。

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max - 10/01/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
60 / 70 → 85%
Weight
87%
Battery
93%
Display
94%
Games Performance
68 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
81%
Average
85%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max评测。一款巨大的、强壮的智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-10- 7 (Update: 2024-08-15)