6.78 英寸 120Hz 显示屏可精确响应触摸操作，提供流畅无缝的过渡。光学指纹传感器位于 OLED 面板的顶部，非常方便，可轻松、可靠地解锁 Magic7 Lite。为了提高安全性，该设备还支持通过前置摄像头进行 2D 面部识别的生物识别认证。
坚固耐用又不失时尚的智能手机 -Honor Magic7 Lite 评测
最新电池技术，价格实惠。
Honor Magic7 Lite 电池容量大，但却坚固轻巧。它还配备了 108 MP 摄像头，据称屏幕亮度超过 4000 尼特。然而，当谈到这款手机的主要亮点时，人们很快就会感到失望。Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Honor Magic7 Lite 的评价
Magic7 Lite 的现代设计和轻巧耐用的机身令人印象深刻。此外，它还兼具出色的续航能力和快速充电技术。不过，尽管采用了非常出色的 OLED 面板，但宣传亮度与我们的测量结果之间存在明显差异。不过，SoC 的选择并没有让这款Honor 智能手机很好地面向未来，因为它的性能储备似乎已经很有限了。
那些期待 2025 年中档手机更新周期长和当前Android 的人会对Honor 智能手机感到失望。例如，三星的Galaxy A35 提供了更好的软件支持。摄像头也有待改进。
Pros
+ 令人印象深刻的超长电池寿命
+ 带 pwm 调光功能的高品质 Oled 面板
+ 节流最小
+ 坚固耐用的外壳
Cons
- SoC 性能乏善可陈
- 摄像头质量有待提高
- Wi-Fi 网速较慢
- 仅限 USB 2.0
- 目前运行Android 14
- 软件更新有限
价格和供应情况
虽然我们的评测是在德国进行的，但Honor Magic7 Lite 已在美国上市，售价约为 499 美元起。在德国，亚马逊（Amazon.de）等零售商或直接从制造商处购买，零售价从 400 欧元起。.欲了解更多详情，请访问制造商的官方网站或亚马逊或 BestBuy 等授权零售商。
$11.52
KJYFOANI for Honor Magic7 Lite Screen Protector Tempered Galss, [5 Pack] High Clear [9H Hardness] [Bubble Free] Screen Tempered Glass Protective Film for Honor Magic7 Lite 6.78 Inch.
- $5.52KJYFOANI for Honor Magic7 Lite Screen Protector Tempered Galss, [1 Pack] High Clear [9H Hardness] [Bubble Free] Screen Tempered Glass Protective Film for Honor Magic7 Lite 6.78 Inch.
- $4.33AKABEILA Compatible with Honor Magic7 Lite 【1 Pack Screen Protector】 HD Tempered Glass Protective Film 9H Hardness Case Friendly Easy Installation Anti-Fingerprint Bubble Free Black&1
Table of Contents
- Honor Magic7 Lite 的评价
- Specifications of the Honor Magic7 Lite
- 外壳 - Magic7 Lite 坚固耐用，可在沙漠中使用，这得益于其耐热性能
- 功能 -Honor 配备 USB 2.0 接口的智能手机
- 软件 - Magic7 Lite 仅适用于Android 14
- 通信与全球导航卫星系统 -Honor 配备 5G 功能的智能手机
- 电话功能和通话质量 -Honor 带 eSIM 卡的智能手机
- 相机 - Magic7 Lite，108 万像素
- 配件和保修
- 输入设备和控制装置
- 显示屏 -Honor 全面采用 OLED 显示屏
- 性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的 Magic7 Lite
- 排放 -Honor 智能手机保持凉爽
- 电池续航时间 -Honor 配备 XXL 电池的智能手机
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
Honor 扩展其 Magic7 系列Lite 机型，为该系列增添了一款中端手机。不过，Magic7 Lite 并非全新产品，因为它实质上是一款重新命名的 Honor X9c.Honor 智能手机配备了 高通骁龙 6 代 1并提供 8 或 12 GB 内存以及 256 或 512 GB 存储空间。
Specifications of the Honor Magic7 Lite
Honor Magic7 Lite (Magic7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 710
Memory
8 GB
, LPDDR5
Display
6.78 inch 19.9:9, 2700 x 1224 pixel 437 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB
, 456 GB free
Weight
189 g
Price
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
外壳 - Magic7 Lite 坚固耐用，可在沙漠中使用，这得益于其耐热性能
由于边缘非常薄，6.78 英寸的 Magic7 Lite 在这个价位的手机中看起来非常吸引人，而接近 91% 的显示屏表面比率也非常高效。据制造商称，这款中档手机的外壳经过加固设计，可以承受从 2 米高处跌落。不过，这款通过 IP64 认证的Honor 智能手机不具备防水功能。不过，对于一款配备 6,600 毫安时电池的智能手机来说，Magic7 Lite 189 克的重量并不算特别重。据Honor 称，它还特别耐热（最高 50 °C）。
这款中档智能手机的塑料边框和背面并没有散发出品质感，但做工和整体表面处理都达到了不错的水准。
功能 -Honor 配备 USB 2.0 接口的智能手机
Magic7 Lite 只提供蓝牙 5.1，尽管高通芯片组应该支持 5.2 标准。Honor 智能手机中使用的 WiFi 5 在骁龙 6 代 1 的支持下也会更快。制造商还在 USB 端口上偷工减料。在我们使用三星 980 Pro（M2 固态硬盘）进行的传输测试中，该连接的传输速度很慢，只有 35 MB/s。USB 2.0 标准也不支持视频输出。连接的存储设备必须使用 NTFS 或 exFAT 格式化。
软件 - Magic7 Lite 仅适用于Android 14
Honor 在其中档智能手机上预装了基于 14 的 MagicOS 8.0。在测试阶段，该操作系统使用 2024 年 12 月的安全补丁，并将在 2027 年之前接受安全更新。预计最多会有三次操作系统升级，包括升级到 15。
Android Android
在更新方面， 可以向 Google 或 Samsung 学习，尤其是该品牌过去在为其 Magic 系列提供及时的软件更新方面并不总是很出色。Honor 谷歌 Pixel 8a 评测--这款小型谷歌智能手机在中端市场独树一帜 三星Galaxy A55 5G 评测--中端智能手机中的众多高端功能
可持续性
可持续发展并不是Honor营销战略的核心重点。该公司没有提供有关碳足迹或使用可回收材料的详细信息。不过，包装似乎完全不使用塑料。
通信与全球导航卫星系统 -Honor 配备 5G 功能的智能手机
Magic7 Lite 支持移动接入快速的 5G 网络，在德语地区，即使使用 4G 网络，也能保持可靠的连接。不过，在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器进行测试时，我们发现传输速率明显偏低，Wi-Fi 传输速率低于 400 Mbps。
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø930 (497-1015)
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø927 (893-940)
Honor Magic7 Lite 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (354-385)
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (949-996)
Honor Magic7 Lite 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø342 (336-346)
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø865 (728-921)
与我们的参考设备 Garmin Venu 2 相比，Magic7 Lite 的定位精度令人印象深刻，但仍有一些微小的误差。通过单频 GNSS 连接，Magic7 Lite 实现了约 3 米的精确度。
电话功能和通话质量 -Honor 带 eSIM 卡的智能手机
通话质量明显不错，语音清晰再现，并支持 Wi-Fi 通话和 VoLTE 等功能。除两张实体 nanoSIM 卡外，还可使用一张 eSIM 卡。
相机 - Magic7 Lite，108 万像素
Magic7 Lite 的主摄像头采用 1/1.67 英寸规格的三星 ISOCELL HM6 图像传感器，分辨率为 1.08 亿像素。这使得原生像素非常小，通常组合起来可生成 1200 万像素的照片。在日光下，该镜头表现良好，清晰度尚可，但拍摄对象可能会显得过于锐利。照片的动态范围可以做得更好，精细的细节经常会丢失。
Honor 智能手机的色彩略显过度饱和，尤其是蓝色和绿色调。我们在受控照明条件下进行的测量证实了这一点，ColorChecker Passport 的偏差超过了 10。
虽然手机背面没有长焦镜头，但却配备了超广角摄像头。不过，由于分辨率仅为 500 万像素，它在清晰度和细节方面都有所欠缺，未能给人留下深刻印象。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightUltraweitwinkelZoom 5x
11.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
35 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
29 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
47 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
配件和保修
包装盒内没有电源适配器或保护套，但有一条 USB-C 至 USB-C 数据/充电线和一个方便的 SIM 卡工具。此外，还预装了屏幕保护膜，省去了您的麻烦。
通过在德国进行的评测，我们发现Honor 为 Lite 型号在德国提供 24 个月的独家保修服务，让您买得放心。
输入设备和控制装置
显示屏 -Honor 全面采用 OLED 显示屏
Honor 智能手机的显示屏分辨率为 2,700 x 1,224 像素，像素密度高达 437 PPI。120 Hz 的刷新率可手动降至 60 Hz，但无法进行动态调节。
虽然制造商宣称峰值亮度为 4,000 cd/m²，但我们的测量结果却远远低于这一数值，事实上还低得多。在实际使用中，6.78 英寸 OLED 面板的亮度要低得多，我们的 APL18 测试显示亮度为 1,289 cd/m²，视频播放亮度为 1,295 cd/m²。尽管如此，亮度仍然足以提供良好的 HDR 效果。
Magic7 Lite 采用 3,840 Hz 的高 PWM 频率调节亮度，我们已确认其频率为 4,166 Hz。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1272 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1235 cd/m² Minimum: 2.43 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1228 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Honor Magic7 Lite AMOLED, 2700x1224, 6.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -8% | -4% | -38% | -36% | |
| Brightness middle | 1228 | 1138 -7% | 1034 -16% | 904 -26% | 1034 -16% |
| Brightness | 1235 | 1137 -8% | 1041 -16% | 912 -26% | 1038 -16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 97 2% | 97 2% | 97 2% | 96 1% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.1 -0% | 1 9% | 2.1 -91% | 1.8 -64% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.2 | 2.6 -18% | 2.2 -0% | 2.8 -27% | 3.9 -77% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.6 -14% | 1.4 -0% | 2.2 -57% | 2 -43% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.1 105% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6605 98% | 6284 103% | 6553 99% | 6478 100% | 6803 96% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 13.89 % Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8508 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（虽然最小亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平 虽然最小亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平缓，但这是由于缩放造成的）。最小亮度下的振幅放大图显示在信息框中）。
通过使用照片光谱仪和 Calman 软件进行分析，我们发现Honor 智能手机在 sRGB 色彩空间中的平均 Delta E 偏差非常低。除了两个色彩配置文件外，白平衡也可以在设置菜单中进行自定义。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.504 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5375 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.95 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4275 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5215 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). | ||
Magic7 Lite 的可视角度稳定性令人印象深刻，在户外也表现出色。它的亮度足以应对大多数光线条件。不过，在夏季阳光直射的情况下，玻璃表面的反光可能会让人分心。
性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的 Magic7 Lite
就其价格范围而言 骁龙 6 代 1Magic7 Lite 采用的骁龙 6 代处理器性能相对较弱。在我们进行的 CPU 基准测试中，它经常是最后一名。即使在日常使用中，这款中端手机偶尔也会感觉有些迟缓。
人工智能性能也处于较低水平，Magic7 Lite 与采用联发科 Dimensity 8400 的Poco X7 Pro 之间存在明显差距。
Geekbench 6.4 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI
与 CPU 相比，图形测试中的性能差距更为明显。图形处理器 Adreno 710在 GFXBench Onscreen 测试中的帧速率非常低。Tier 测试的帧率从 5 到 30 FPS 左右不等，这意味着 Magic7 Lite 很快就会在要求苛刻的游戏中陷入困境。
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| Honor Magic7 Lite | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
| Honor Magic7 Lite | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (Chrome 128) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (69.6 - 114.8, n=4) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor Magic7 Lite | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCMark for Android | -34% | 15% | -39% | 37% | 20% | 27% | |
| Storage 2.0 seq. read int. | 1573 ? | 816 ? -48% | 1605 ? 2% | 478 ? -70% | 1403 ? -11% | 1583 ? 1% | |
| Storage 2.0 seq. write int. | 1255 ? | 640 ? -49% | 1334 ? 6% | 444 ? -65% | 1222 ? -3% | 1449 ? 15% | |
| Storage 2.0 random read int. | 30.1 ? | 24.5 ? -19% | 23 ? -24% | 37.2 ? 24% | 43.2 ? 44% | 39.6 ? 32% | |
| Storage 2.0 random write int. | 45.8 ? | 34.4 ? -25% | 45.7 ? 0% | 33.8 ? -26% | 71.1 ? 55% | 63.6 ? 39% | |
| Storage 2.0 | 29119 ? | 20238 ? -30% | 55399 ? 90% | 12748 ? -56% | 39973 37% | 33376 ? 15% | 42719 ? 47% |
排放 -Honor 智能手机保持凉爽
温度
持续负载下的表面温度并不高，峰值仅为 43°C。这也反映在 3DMark 压力测试中，Honor 智能手机几乎没有节流。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor Magic7 Lite | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| Honor Magic7 Lite | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor Magic7 Lite | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Lite Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.67 (3.66-3.68)
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.23 (8.19-8.24)
Honor Magic7 Lite Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.2-14.3)
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø28.1 (28-28.3)
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.7 (29.6-29.9)
Honor Magic7 Lite Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø1.491 (1.484-1.496)
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7350 Pro, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø3.94 (3.92-3.97)
发言人
作为一款中端设备，Magic7 Lite 的立体声扬声器还算不错，不过在粉红噪声测试中，中音明显偏高，缺乏层次感。低音几乎听不到。此外，你还可以通过 USB 或蓝牙无线连接耳机。有多种音频编解码器可供选择，以获得全面的声音体验。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Magic7 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 -Honor 配备 XXL 电池的智能手机
耗电量
在我们的功耗测试中，Magic7 Lite 在空闲模式下的能效并不特别高，而在负载模式下的能耗则相对较低。其突出特点是配备了 6600 毫安时电池，充电速度最高可达 66 瓦。使用 小米 25000充电器，充满电仅需一个多小时。不过，Honor 智能手机不支持无线充电。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.06 / 0.23 Watt |
| Idle |  0.93 / 1.31 / 1.54 Watt |
| Load |
3.1 / 8.42 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Honor Magic7 Lite 6600 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 5110 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 5000 mAh | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | -33% | -36% | -15% | -78% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.93 | 1.17 -26% | 1.07 -15% | 0.89 4% | 0.86 8% | 0.995 ? -7% | 0.872 ? 6% |
| Idle Average * | 1.31 | 1.38 -5% | 1.29 2% | 1.99 -52% | 1.56 -19% | 3.23 ? -147% | 1.437 ? -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.54 | 1.41 8% | 1.36 12% | 2.14 -39% | 1.59 -3% | 3.32 ? -116% | 1.582 ? -3% |
| Load Average * | 3.1 | 3.58 -15% | 6.14 -98% | 4.57 -47% | 4.52 -46% | 6.5 ? -110% | 7 ? -126% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.42 | 8.44 -0% | 13.94 -66% | 12.31 -46% | 9.58 -14% | 9.3 ? -10% | 10.4 ? -24% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Honor Magic7 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.49 (0.715-8.82)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (1.191-10.8)
Honor Magic7 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.838 (0.77-0.963)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Honor Magic7 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.3 (3.19-3.51)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.37 (3.89-5.98)
Honor Magic7 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.838 (0.77-0.963)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
电池寿命
在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，大容量电池在实际条件下（显示屏亮度：150 cd/m²）提供了出色的续航能力，运行时间令人印象深刻。
| Honor Magic7 Lite 6600 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 5110 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 5000 mAh | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1384 | 1206 -13% | 1183 -15% | 902 -35% | 1104 -20% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Honor Magic7 Lite 有一些不足之处，但由于其现代的设计和出色的电池续航能力，仍能吸引一些用户。
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 04/05/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: Comparing potential alternatives
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 77.4%  | Honor Magic7 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.52 KJYFOANI for Honor Magic7 Li... 2. $5.52 KJYFOANI for Honor Magic7 Li... 3. $4.33 AKABEILA Compatible with Hon... List Price: 400€ | 189 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2700x1224 437 PPI AMOLED |
2. 77.8%  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 2. $11.99 Ibywind Screen Protector For... 3. $7.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... List Price: 400€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED |
3. 80.9%  | Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G720 MP7 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P... 2. $225.03 Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Lte Gs... 3. $11.99 Ibywind Screen Protector For... List Price: 430€ | 198 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED |
4. 85.9% v7 (old)  | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 2. $5.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector C... 3. $6.95 NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa... List Price: 379€ | 209 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" 2340x1080 390 PPI Super AMOLED |
5. 79.9%  | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G ⎘ ARM Mali-G610 MP4 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | List Price: 429€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2400x1080 393 PPI AMOLED |
6. 83.9% v7 (old)  | Honor Magic6 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $12.66 Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 2. $14.39 AKABEILA 3 Pack Screen Prote... 3. AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... List Price: 400€ | 185 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2652x1200 429 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
