小米 Pad 6S Pro 评测 - 规格出众的多功能 12.4 英寸平板电脑

Name: Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

体积大、速度快，而且价格合理。

Pad 6S Pro 是小米的首款高端平板电脑。该设备采用骁龙 8 代 2 处理器，拥有令人印象深刻的 12.4 英寸面板，长宽比为 3:2，并支持手写笔。不过，这款售价 700 欧元（约合 760 美元）的平板电脑在我们的评测过程中确实暴露出了一些弱点。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/23/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

小米发布了一款 12.4 英寸 Pad 6S Pro 高端平板电脑，其纸面参数令人印象深刻。纤薄的铝制机身搭载了速度极快的骁龙 8 代 2144Hz 显示屏，3K 分辨率（3,048 x 2,032 像素），支持手写笔，8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。

Pad 6S Pro 将与以下重量级产品正面交锋 Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022和三星Galaxy Tab S9+.在价格方面，小米平板电脑无疑比竞争对手更有优势，因为它的价格要便宜得多，大约为 700 欧元（760 美元）。在我们的评测中，我们将讨论这款设备在性能和功能上是否真的能与竞争对手相媲美。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Pad 6 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 740

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR5X

Display

12.40 inch 3:2, 3048 x 2032 pixel 294 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, IPS, 3K display, touch sampling rate up to 360 Hz, 10-bit colour depth, DC dimming, HDR, HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 233 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: G-sensor, Gyroscope, L-Sensor, P-Sensor, E-Compass, Fingerprint Sensor, Hall sensor, Flicker Sensor, Color temperature sensor, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, NFC Tag support, Camera2 API Level 3, 2x2 MIMO

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.26 x 278.7 x 191.58

Battery

10000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung ISOCELL JN1, 1/2.76", f/1.8, 0.64μm pixel size) + 2 MP depth sensor (Omnovision OV02B1B, 1/5", f/2.4, 1.75μm pixel size), videos up to 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (Omnivision OV32D, f/2.2, 0.61μm pixel size), videos up to 1080p@30fps

Additional features

Speakers: 6 speakers (Dolby Vision & Atmos support), Keyboard: virtual, 120W charger (20V/6A), USB-C cable, quick start guide, warranty card, Xiaomi HyperOS, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

590 g, Power Supply: 195 g

Price

700 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	590 g	6.26 mm	12.40"	3048x2032
91.8 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	682 g	6.4 mm	12.90"	2732x2048
89.1 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro SD 870, Adreno 650	565 g	5.6 mm	12.60"	2560x1600
91.3 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	586 g	5.7 mm	12.40"	2800x1752
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Xiaomi Pad 6 SD 870, Adreno 650	490 g	6.51 mm	11.00"	2880x1800

保护壳 - 采用纤薄铝制机身的小米 Pad 6S Pro

Pad 6S Pro 只有小米所谓的石墨灰版本。这款平板电脑采用一体式机身设计，边框非常薄，纵横比为 3:2，看起来很高档，手感也很好。虽然你可能不会从外观上猜到，但 6 毫米薄（约 0.24 英寸）的机身内总共装有六个扬声器。

Pad 6S Pro 重 590 克（1.3 磅），其背面和边框由哑光铝合金制成，边缘略呈圆形，这意味着没有尖锐的侧面。在大猩猩 5 号玻璃的保护下，IPS 显示屏周围的黑色边框仅有 7 毫米（0.28 英寸），屏占比高达 88.5%，令人印象深刻。

摄像头模块与优雅的设计并不完全吻合，因为它看起来相当笨重，突出后盖约 3 毫米（0.12 英寸）。由于摄像头的凸起，尽管 Pad 6S Pro 的外形尺寸为 12.4 英寸，但在平面上轻触靠近左下角的显示屏时，它还是会前后摇晃几下。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Xiaomi Pad 6 DIN A4 ❌

规格：USB-C 3.0 和快速存储

小米 Pad 6S Pro 的官方售价为 700 欧元（760 美元），配备 8 GB LPDDR5X 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。根据规格，应该还有第二个版本，配备 12 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间。不过，在撰写这篇评论时，小米网上商店还没有提供这种配置。

Pad 6S Pro 配备了快速 USB 3.2 Gen 1 端口，最大传输速度为 5 Gbit/s，还支持向外部显示器输出视频。该平板电脑还能通过 Miracast 无线连接外部显示器。此外，USB 端口还兼容 OTG，可以连接外部存储设备和外围设备。在我们使用三星 980 Pro USB 硬盘进行的拷贝测试中，USB 接口的传输速率达到了 283.9 MB/s。

Pad 6S Pro 的电源按钮上内置了指纹传感器。设备顶部有一个小凹槽，看起来可以容纳 SIM 或 microSD 插槽。但小米平板电脑不支持这两种功能。取而代之的是一个磁条，用于夹住选配的小米 Focus 笔并为其充电。Pad 6S Pro 没有 IP 防护等级。

软件 -Android 14 和 HyperOS

小米 Pad 6S Pro 配备了基于Android 14 的 HyperOS 用户界面。我们的评测机运行的操作系统版本为 1.0.1.0.UNXEUXM，Android 2024 年 3 月 1 日的安全补丁。

在撰写本文时，小米安全中心没有任何关于关于该公司打算为该平板电脑提供多长时间的更新支持的信息。如果其他平板电脑（如小米 Pad 6）有任何迹象，我们应该会看到三年的安全更新和两次操作系统升级。

顺便提一下，Android 15 的测试版该平板电脑已经有了测试版。作为开发者预览计划的一部分，小米为其三款设备提供了可下载的测试版。除了 Pad 6S Pro 之外，还有小米 14和小米 13T Pro也可以访问预览版。必须解锁引导加载器才能安装测试版。

连接性 - WiFi 7，但没有 GPS

Pad 6S Pro 在连接性方面的表现相当一般，这在高端平板电脑中并不多见。该设备既没有蜂窝网络，也不能通过 GPS 确定位置。不过，Pad 6S Pro 支持蓝牙 5.3，并具有 NFC 标签功能，可用于在平板电脑和兼容的小米智能手机之间共享屏幕内容、文件和照片。要实现这种数据传输，另一台移动设备必须靠近位于 Pad 6S Pro 右上角的 NFC 模块。

小米平板电脑支持 WiFi 7，因此可以通过 2.4、5 和 6 GHz 三个 WiFi 频段进行通信。当连接到华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器时，Pad 6S Pro的传输速率很高，而且基本稳定，是目前大多数12.x英寸平板电脑无法比拟的。三星三星Galaxy Tab S9+是我们比较中唯一能提供类似性能的设备，而 Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022则远远落后。

Networking
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	778 (min: 542) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	953 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1620 (min: 1070) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1437 (min: 1239) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000	442 (min: 222) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	486 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	747 (min: 145) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	702 (min: 225) MBit/s ∼49%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	719 (min: 644) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	851 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1518 (min: 1344) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1006 (min: 859) MBit/s ∼70%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	932 (min: 727) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	880 (min: 791) MBit/s ∼92%

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1620 (1070-1792)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1518 (1344-1577)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1436 (1239-1549)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1006 (859-1153)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø776 (542-819)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø953 (870-981)

摄像头 - 配备三星 ISOCELL JN1 的 Pad 6S Pro

Pad 6S Pro 的 3200 万像素自拍摄像头支持 HDR，并能以高达 30 fps 的速度录制全高清视频。在人像模式下，它能产生良好的虚化效果，在视频通话时也能提供出色的图像质量。使用 Pro Cover 的脚架可将位于显示屏顶部边缘的前置摄像头置于最佳位置。

在主摄像头方面，小米平板电脑采用了 5000 万像素的三星 ISOCELL JN1 传感器。三星Galaxy A25 5G和小米Redmi Note 12 5G.Pad 6S Pro 的图像质量与之类似，对于平板电脑来说相当不错。三星 ISOCELL JN1 由一个 200 万像素的 OmniVision OV02B1B 深度传感器提供支持。

由于 Pad 6S Pro 的尺寸为 12.4 英寸，使用它拍照不如使用智能手机方便。不过，在日光下，小米平板电脑能为用户提供清晰、细腻、生动的照片。相比之下，使用数码变焦拍摄的照片看起来不是特别好，在弱光环境下可能会显得模糊。主摄像头可以拍摄高达 4K 和 60 fps 的视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 5x zoom Low-light photo

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在可控光照条件下，主相机的自然色彩还原给我们留下了深刻印象。黑色阴影几乎没有变亮，相机的白平衡整体偏暖，这也是您在日常使用中会注意到的。在照片中，测试图看起来非常清晰，即使在 1 勒克斯的照明条件下拍摄，也几乎完全可以辨认。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro: 6.36 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 12.64 ∆E

配件和保修 - 配备 120 瓦充电器的小米平板电脑

在包装盒内，你会发现一个 120 瓦的充电器、一条 USB-C 数据线、一份快速入门指南和一张保修卡，还有 Pad 6S Pro。

小米还提供一个脚架 (小米 Pad 6S Pro Cover )，30 欧元或 32 美元。30 欧元或 32 美元）、键盘附件 (小米 Pad 6S Pro 触摸板键盘，170 欧元或 184 美元）以及主动式触控笔 (小米 Focus Pen100欧元或108美元）作为平板电脑的配件。

在德国，小米为 Pad 6S Pro 提供 24 个月的保修服务。不过，保修条款和条件可能因地区而异。

输入设备和操作 - 分屏视图和桌面模式

Pad 6S Pro 的 12.4 英寸 IPS 面板拥有 360Hz 的最大触摸采样率，能快速、精确地响应输入。加上 144Hz 的最大刷新率，屏幕上的视觉效果异常流畅。集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器允许用户通过生物识别技术解锁平板电脑。此外，2D 人脸识别可作为另一种解锁方法，只要环境光线充足或显示屏足够明亮，它与指纹传感器一样可靠。

虽然 Pad 6S Pro 并不能取代笔记本电脑，但它至少可以提供类似台式机的用户体验。这款平板电脑不仅支持分屏显示两个应用程序，还具有小米所谓的工作站模式。一旦在Android 设置或控制中心启用该模式，平板电脑就会切换到独立的桌面视图。任何放在Android 底座上的应用程序都将在独立窗口中打开。

测试过的配件Focus 触控笔和 Pro Cover

Focus Pen 仅重 15 克（0.53 盎司），可通过蓝牙与平板电脑连接。它支持 8,192 级压力，采样率高达 240Hz。这款主动式手写笔的延迟时间仅为 3 毫秒，可提供反应灵敏、直观的书写和绘图体验。预装的 Mi Canvas 应用程序可用作笔记工具。Focus Pen 通过磁力吸附在平板电脑的顶部，同时也是为触控笔充电的地方。

Focus Pen 的三个按钮提供了一些独特的额外功能。最靠近笔尖的书写按钮可以打开 Mi Canvas 应用程序，通过连续按下该按钮可以在各种笔刷之间切换。中间的截图按钮用于截取整个显示屏或选定部分的屏幕截图。顶部的聚光灯按钮有三种用途：可以将 Focus Pen 变成虚拟激光笔、注释工具或相机应用中的遥控触发器。

由于我们只能使用 Pro Cover 而不是 Pro Touch 键盘，因此无法对键盘提供的输入体验发表评论。Pro Cover 有一个脚架，可以在纵向和横向两种方向上以大约 45 度的角度放置平板电脑。合上盖子，平板电脑将自动进入休眠状态。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 明亮、便于阅读的 3:2 面板，无 PWM

小米 Pad 6S Pro 采用分辨率为 3,048 x 2,032 的 IPS 面板。与一般 16:9 或 16:10 的平板电脑屏幕相比，它的长宽比为 3:2，可以在浏览互联网、办公应用以及绘图和书写时显示更多信息。不过，代价是在观看视频时需要忍受屏幕顶部和底部的背条。

由于只采用了 IPS 面板，小米平板电脑无法与采用 OLED 显示屏的竞争对手相媲美，例如 Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022和三星Galaxy Tab S9+.尽管如此，Pad 6S Pro 的高对比度仍然给人留下了深刻印象，甚至在我们的对比中达到了最高的峰值亮度。

在显示全白背景时，IPS 面板的平均峰值亮度为 810 cd/m²。当亮区和暗区均匀分布时，这一数字增加到 868 cd/m²（APL18 测量值）。另一个优点是，小米 Pad 6S Pro 不使用脉宽调制（PWM）来控制屏幕亮度，因此对于那些对 PWM 闪烁敏感的人来说是个不错的选择。


752 cd/m²	844 cd/m²	795 cd/m²
811 cd/m²	867 cd/m²	820 cd/m²
805 cd/m²	784 cd/m²	811 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 867 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 809.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 867 cd/m²
Contrast: 1495:1 (Black: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29

	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro IPS, 3048x2032, 12.4"	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9"	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4"	Xiaomi Pad 6 IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 11"
Screen		7%	-21%	-8%	6%
Brightness middle	867	611 -30%	552 -36%	574 -34%	541 -38%
Brightness	810	605 -25%	555 -31%	551 -32%	494 -39%
Brightness Distribution	87	92 6%	97 11%	89 2%	89 2%
Black Level *	0.58				0.65 -12%
Contrast	1495				832 -44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2	1.4 30%	3.43 -72%	2.01 -1%	0.9 55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.5	3.3 40%	7.25 -32%	4.93 10%	1.8 67%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3	2.3 23%	2 33%	2.8 7%	1.4 53%
Gamma	2.29 ^96%	2.22 ^99%	2.253 ^98%	2.066 ^106%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6957 ^93%	6930 ^94%	6417 ^101%	6566 ^99%	6710 ^97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

IPS 面板的色彩设置可通过三种配置文件进行修改：原色专业版、鲜艳版和饱和版。您还可以在 "高级设置"中手动调整色彩空间、RGB 平衡和伽玛等图像参数。该平板电脑还提供根据环境光线自动调整色彩还原的选项。

在原色专业模式下，IPS 显示屏的图像质量最佳。尽管白平衡并不十分理想，但人眼不太可能察觉到色彩和灰度的参考值有任何偏差。

色彩准确度（配置文件：Original Color Pro，目标色域：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.837 ms rise
11.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.808 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.15 ms rise
24.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.95 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

小米 Pad 6S Pro 具备良好的户外使用条件。IPS 面板提供了广阔的可视角度，即使在阳光直射下，屏幕内容也能保持相对清晰。

性能 - 配备骁龙 8 代 2 的 Pad 6S Pro

骁龙 8 代 2 骁龙 8 代 2Pad 6S Pro 是目前速度最快的Android 平板电脑之一。这不仅体现在基准测试结果上，如其在安兔兔 v10 中获得的 1,516,127 分。在日常使用中，这款平板电脑也非常迅捷，可以轻松完成任何任务。

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	5652 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4255 - 5765, n=17)	5226 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	5176 Points
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)	3544 Points -32%
Xiaomi Pad 6	3357 Points -35%
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	2107 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1432 - 2104, n=17)	1926 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1924 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6	1299 Points -32%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)	1111 Points -42%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1890 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	1566 Points +6%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1477 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1048 - 1574, n=20)	1455 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 6	1003 Points -32%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	955 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	8524 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	5198 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4192 - 5243, n=20)	4918 Points +8%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	4548 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6	3328 Points -27%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	3215 Points -29%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2494 Points -45%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1398472 - 1607558, n=12)	1539082 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1516127 Points
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=37, last 2 years)	781418 Points -48%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1416727 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1111522 - 1322448, n=17)	1259049 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	1255800 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1247557 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	707685 Points -43%
Xiaomi Pad 6	581322 Points -53%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points -62%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	17267 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	16960 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11562 - 20394, n=24)	15817 Points -7%
Xiaomi Pad 6	13728 Points -19%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	13565 Points -20%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points -42%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1584 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	1277 Points +11%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1153 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (778 - 1356, n=22)	1138 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	773 Points -33%
Xiaomi Pad 6	754 Points -35%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	732 Points -37%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	8886 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (7354 - 9730, n=22)	8794 Points +4%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	8483 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	5865 Points -31%
Xiaomi Pad 6	5289 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4205 Points -50%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	13730 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (10786 - 15148, n=22)	13173 Points +4%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	12668 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	9124 Points -28%
Xiaomi Pad 6	8463 Points -33%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7265 Points -43%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	10049 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (6601 - 10834, n=22)	9479 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	8890 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	7365 Points -27%
Xiaomi Pad 6	6127 Points -39%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4862 Points -52%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	31688 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (22837 - 32334, n=22)	27375 Points +19%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	23041 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	11754 Points -49%
Xiaomi Pad 6	11263 Points -51%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9168 Points -60%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1077 - 2044, n=22)	1777 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1766 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	1612 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	1452 Points -18%
Xiaomi Pad 6	1336 Points -24%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points -28%

AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	156427 Points +13892%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (941 - 173234, n=18)	29790 Points +2565%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +552%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1118 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Pad 6	16501 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	16134 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11338 - 16880, n=21)	15142 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	14961 Points
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11323 Points -24%

Legend

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Average of class Tablet

处理器 Adreno 740 GPU上的骁龙 8 代 2使小米 Pad 6S Pro 能够提供高端图形性能。GFXBench 的 "阿兹台克废墟高阶屏幕测试 "等基准测试表明，即使在高设置下，这款平板电脑也能以超过 30 帧/秒的速度运行图形要求苛刻的游戏。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6909 Points +124%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3684 Points +19%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3088 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1233 Points -60%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1225 Points -60%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6919 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3710 Points +8%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3421 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1246 Points -64%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1232 Points -64%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	25317 Points +95%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12952 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4252 Points -67%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4199 Points -68%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5623 Points +15%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4887 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5630 Points +15%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4876 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13009 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8365 Points -36%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7363 Points -43%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	20808 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10321 Points -50%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8593 Points -59%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5627 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5265 Points -6%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4882 Points -13%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	144 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps -17%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -17%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps -24%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	873 fps +120%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	493 fps +24%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	397 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	226 fps -43%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps -54%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps -1%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps -35%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -51%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	494 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	321 fps +29%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	249 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	132 fps -47%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps -53%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	115 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	105 fps +52%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -29%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -52%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	340 fps +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	226 fps +25%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	181 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95 fps -48%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps -55%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +112%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps +52%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	42 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -29%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps -50%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	214 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	132 fps +25%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps -45%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -54%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	70 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51 fps +46%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	35 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -43%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps -51%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	90 fps +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps +14%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -61%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -64%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78 fps +39%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -43%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	241 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	159 fps +9%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	146 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -61%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -64%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	48 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	29 fps +12%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.7 fps -63%

在 Pad 6S Pro 上浏览互联网是一种流畅的体验。在浏览器基准测试中 Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022比我们对比的所有Android 设备都要快，不过在实际浏览网页时你可能不会注意到这一点。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	225.315 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	196.271 Points +11%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	176.366 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)	133.1 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)	111.2 Points -37%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	108.3 Points -39%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	86.985 Points -51%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	227 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	187 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	167 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)	130.6 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)	106.9 Points -36%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	94 Points -44%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	342 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	243 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (115 - 238, n=11)	197.5 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	193 Points
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	155.2 Points -20%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	155 Points -20%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (chrome 115)	134 Points -31%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	376 runs/min +67%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	225 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	195 runs/min -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 225, n=18)	141.6 runs/min -37%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)	121.9 runs/min -46%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	68.93 runs/min -69%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	65.5 runs/min -71%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	74614 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	64715 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	64638 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)	45827 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	41256 Points -36%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	30783 Points -52%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points -55%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3734 ms * -520%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	1532.1 ms * -155%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	1055 ms * -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)	1023 ms * -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	635.1 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	602 ms *
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	450.9 ms * +25%

* ... smaller is better

Pad 6S Pro 的 UFS 4.0 存储系统可实现极高的数据传输速率。即使是大型应用程序，安装和加载也几乎不花时间。

	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	Xiaomi Pad 6	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-57%	-18%	-48%	-7%	-65%
Sequential Read 256KB	3465.72	1782 -49%	3413.8 -1%	1673.97 -52%	3608 ?(3249 - 4384, n=26) 4%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) -70%
Sequential Write 256KB	3154.3	758 -76%	2528.2 -20%	745.32 -76%	2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26) -20%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -78%
Random Read 4KB	381.97	232.5 -39%	450.3 18%	298.45 -22%	406 ?(218 - 483, n=26) 6%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -50%
Random Write 4KB	510.95	189.2 -63%	161.3 -68%	304.34 -40%	421 ?(152.9 - 730, n=26) -18%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) -63%

游戏 - 保证游戏流畅

Pad 6S Pro 拥有充足的动力，即使是要求最苛刻的Android 游戏也能流畅运行。为了说明这一点，我们在平板电脑上测试了《PUBG Mobile》和《Genshin Impact》，并使用Gamebench测试工具记录帧率。

在设置全部调高的情况下，《源氏冲击》的运行帧数几乎保持在 60 帧/秒。PUBG Mobile》也是如此，在最低图形设置 "流畅"下也能以 90 帧/秒的速度运行。

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.6.0_22174900_22378599: Ø59.7 (49-60)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.6.0_22174900_22378599: Ø59.4 (53-60)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.2.0: Ø87.8 (67-90)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.2.0: Ø59.7 (51-61)

排放 - 六个扬声器发出令人印象深刻的声音

温度

在我们的测试中，Pad 6S Pro 的表面温度始终保持在安全范围内。即使在使用 Burnout Benchmark 进行一小时的压力测试后，平板电脑的表面温度也没有超过 41.9°C （107.4°F）。

小米平板电脑能够有效地散发使用时产生的热量。在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中，首次运行后帧速率略有下降，但随后保持非常稳定。在 Solar Bay 压力测试中，性能几乎没有下降。

Max. Load

Idle


37.6 °C	41.9 °C	31.5 °C
31.9 °C	34.7 °C	28.9 °C
30.4 °C	29.8 °C	30.7 °C

Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 33 °C


32.1 °C	38.3 °C	40.6 °C
30.4 °C	35.3 °C	34.9 °C
29.1 °C	30.7 °C	30.7 °C

Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 33.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63.9 (63.3-68.9)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø97.9 (82.8-119)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.2 (25.1-25.3)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.1 (60.6-78.8)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.5 (21.1-25.4)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.9-19.5)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.8 (27.1-41.5)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø7.3 (7.29-7.33)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.2 (20.5-23.4)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø6.27 (6.1-7.39)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø124.5 (113.6-152.4)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14 (14-14)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø18.3 (18.2-18.3)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	99.5 (7.29^min - 7.33^max) % +9%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	91.3 (17.9^min - 19.5^max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	87.4 (20.5^min - 23.4^max) % -4%
Xiaomi Pad 6	82.5 (6.1^min - 7.39^max) % -10%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	65.1 (27.1^min - 41.5^max) % -29%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	99.4 (25.1^min - 25.3^max) % +8%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	91.9 (63.3^min - 68.9^max) %
Xiaomi Pad 6	83.1 (21.1^min - 25.4^max) % -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	76.9 (60.6^min - 78.8^max) % -16%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	69.6 (82.8^min - 119^max) % -24%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	74.6 (113.6^min - 152.4^max) %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	99.8 (18.2^min - 18.3^max) % 0%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	99.8 (14^min - 14^max) %

Legend

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

发言人

两个短边的四个扬声器格栅后面共隐藏有六个扬声器。六声道扬声器支持杜比视界（Dolby Vision）和杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos），音质悦耳动听，中高音非常均衡。就平板电脑的标准而言，其音质甚至可以称得上优秀。虽然由于机身纤薄，产生低音的能力有限，但 Pad 6S Pro 仍能将其发挥到极致。

外接音频设备可以通过蓝牙 5.3 或 USB-C 线缆连接到平板电脑。Pad 6S Pro 支持以下蓝牙编解码器：SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+ 和 LHDC V1 至 V5。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 39 分钟充满电

耗电量

Pad 6S Pro 配有 120 瓦的电源适配器，充电速度极快。插入充电器后，在关闭显示屏的情况下，平板电脑从 1%充满仅需 39 分钟。在我们的测试过程中，大约 14 分钟后电池电量已达到 50%，充电约 28 分钟后达到 85%。

Pad 6S Pro 的耗电量并无异常。尽管在空闲和负载情况下，它的耗电量有时明显高于同类产品，但需要注意的是，小米平板电脑的测量采用的是要求更高的 "Burnout Benchmark"，而不是过去使用的 "Stability Test"。因此，这些数据的可比性非常有限。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.03 / 0.25 Watt
Idle	1.22 / 7.18 / 8.22 Watt
Load	13.63 / 14.56 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 10000 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro 10200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ 10090 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh
Power Consumption		-43%	23%	-14%	19%
Idle Minimum *	1.22	2.54 -108%	2.2 -80%	3.4 -179%	0.96 21%
Idle Average *	7.18	11.24 -57%	2.6 64%	3.6 50%	4.91 32%
Idle Maximum *	8.22	11.48 -40%	3.2 61%	3.9 53%	5.07 38%
Load Average *	13.63	12.97 5%	7.1 48%	11.7 14%	11.8 13%
Load Maximum *	14.56	16.6 -14%	11.5 21%	15.8 -9%	15.9 -9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2: Ø8.52 (3.33-15.8)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2: Ø9.71 (3.73-16.7)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø6.84 (2.48-12.9)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy: Ø8.88 (3.4-15.7)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø6.53 (2.85-11.7)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12 (11.4-12.9)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.5 (11.7-15.8)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.5-3.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.72 (3.61-3.96)

电池寿命

Pad 6S Pro 的电池容量为 10,000 mAh，续航时间特别长。在我们模拟网页浏览的 Wi-Fi 测试中，该设备的续航时间约为 16 小时。同时，在循环播放视频近 13 个小时后才关机。因此，小米平板电脑在我们的电池续航时间对比中表现出色，至少可以高强度使用一天。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		42h 45min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 44min

	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 10000 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro 10200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ 10090 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh
Battery Runtime		-19%	-19%	-12%	-4%
Reader / Idle	2565	1839 -28%	1034 -60%	996 -61%	2154 -16%
H.264	773	816 6%	892 15%	693 -10%	741 -4%
WiFi v1.3	959	671 -30%	627 -35%	584 -39%	823 -14%
Load	224	173 -23%	236 5%	365 63%	265 18%

Pros

+ 优质铝制机身

+ 明亮的 144Hz IPS 显示屏

+ 出色的摄像头

+ 支持触控笔

+ USB-C 3.2 Gen 1

+ Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.3

+ 120 瓦快速充电

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 无 OLED 面板

- 无存储扩展选项

- 无 IP 等级

- 无蜂窝电话

- 无 GPS。

对小米 Pad 6S Pro 的评价

小米 Pad 6S Pro 是一款功能强大的平板电脑，目前在同类产品中速度最快，这是因为它采用了骁龙 8 代 2.除了一些小的例外，这款 12.4 英寸的平板电脑能够跟上竞争对手的步伐，如 Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022和三星Galaxy Tab S9+等竞争对手的价格和规格。在充电速度方面，它甚至远远超过了这两款设备。

小米 Pad 6S Pro 实际上是为游戏和媒体消费而生。这款平板电脑绝对是为娱乐而生，这要归功于其异常明亮的 144Hz IPS 面板，该面板的纵横比为 3:2，非常适合阅读，而且机身上的六个扬声器还能提供美妙的音质。

小米 Pad 6S Pro 是一款运行速度极快的平板电脑，非常适合游戏和多媒体使用，同时也能很好地提高工作效率。

Pad 6S Pro 同样是一款出色的工作和创意机器。应用程序的分屏模式、快速的 USB 3.2 接口以及对手写笔和键盘附件的支持等功能使这款平板电脑成为了一款生产力工具。

我们希望 Pad 6S Pro 能配备 OLED 面板、GPS 模块和蜂窝网络机型，这些都是竞争对手做得更好的地方。由于包装盒中不包括主动式手写笔，因此大约需要额外支付 100 欧元（109 美元）。

除了Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 和三星Galaxy Tab S9+，还有小米 Pad 6是小米 Pad 6S Pro 的另一个替代产品。这款 11 英寸平板电脑的售价约为 300 欧元（326 美元），同样采用 144Hz 面板并支持手写笔。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

小米 Pad 6S Pro 可直接从该公司的网上商店购买，售价为 699 欧元（约合 760 美元）。德国读者已经可以从亚马逊等在线零售商处以更低的价格购买到这款 12.4 英寸平板电脑。

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro - 05/21/2024 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

70 / 80 → 88%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

59 / 70 → 85%

Weight

82 / 40-88 → 87%

Battery

90%

Display

88%

Games Performance

74 / 78 → 94%

Application Performance

95 / 92 → 100%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

86 / 91 → 94%

Camera

69 / 85 → 81%

Average

83%

89%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.