联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7笔记本电脑回顾。Ryzen 5 6600HS满足良好的16:10显示屏
考虑到其近1000欧元（约998美元）的价格，测试的16ARH7型号对于所提供的性能来说并不是非常实惠。另一方面，这台16英寸的笔记本电脑拥有高质量和一流的显示屏。根据制造商的说法，这里使用的IPS屏幕提供350 cd/m²，120 Hz和100% sRGB。2,560 x 1,600像素的分辨率也没什么可嘲笑的。作为存储解决方案，使用了512GB的NVMe固态硬盘，而DDR5工作内存，不幸的是，它是焊接的，不能扩展，提供16GB。如前所述，对于处理器，联想已经决定采用相当罕见的 Ryzen 5 6600HS它使用了 Radeon 660M.
IdeaPad 5 Pro的竞争对手包括其他16英寸笔记本电脑，如 华为MateBook D16，以及Acer Swift 3 SF316-51，以及LG Gram 16，以及联想瑜伽7 16IAP7这些产品都使用不同的CPU，但它们的图形加速器是相当快的 Iris Xe G7有96个EUs。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 83.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 19.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
由于该机箱在很大程度上与已经测试过的5 Pro 16IHU6相同，带有 酷睿i5-11300H和 GeForce MX450，而且除了一个细节（USB-C 3.2 Gen2端口必须在没有雷电支持的情况下进行），连接也是类似的，我们不会在这里再次讨论机箱、连接设备和输入设备。你可以在这个 的评论中找到相应的信息。.
SD卡阅读器
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
沟通
网络摄像头
显示
16ARH7最大的亮点和购买理由之一是其出色的显示效果，在任何情况下都不会出现任何差错。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 415 cd/m²
Contrast: 1297:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.58
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.272
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AUO B160QAN02.H, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | LG Gram 16 (2021) LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 2% | 25% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 66.2 2% | 66.6 2% | 95.8 47% | 67 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98 | 96.4 -2% | 99.5 2% | 99.8 2% | 95.7 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.2 | 68.3 2% | 68.5 2% | 83.8 25% | 69.3 3% |
| Response Times | -140% | -155% | -197% | -202% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14.1 ? | 30.5 ? -116% | 32 ? -127% | 44 ? -212% | 36 ? -155% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 7.1 ? | 18.7 ? -163% | 20 ? -182% | 20 ? -182% | 24.8 ? -249% |
| PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | ||||
| Screen | -25% | 15% | -83% | -3% | |
| Brightness middle | 415 | 319 -23% | 304 -27% | 331 -20% | 393.7 -5% |
| Brightness | 409 | 317 -22% | 284 -31% | 309 -24% | 367 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 88 -3% | 88 -3% | 84 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.23 28% | 0.165 48% | 0.22 31% | 0.38 -19% |
| Contrast | 1297 | 1387 7% | 1842 42% | 1505 16% | 1036 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.92 | 3.4 -77% | 1.44 25% | 4.64 -142% | 1.97 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.71 | 8.1 -42% | 3.62 37% | 9.82 -72% | 5.46 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.58 | 0.8 -38% | 3.16 -445% | 0.62 -7% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 5.7 -54% | 2.6 30% | 6.9 -86% | 2.1 43% |
| Gamma | 2.272 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.41 91% | 2.34 94% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 7132 91% | 7433 87% | 6527 100% | 7904 82% | 6461 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 68.5 | 75.1 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.5 | 100 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -55% /
-36% | -46% /
-14% | -85% /
-76% | -68% /
-30% |
* ... smaller is better
16英寸显示屏采用16:10格式，由于其2560 x 1600像素的相当高的分辨率，可以提供相当清晰的图像。100%的sRGB覆盖率也是可敬的，但所有的竞争对手在这里都达到了同样的效果。然而，在响应时间方面，没有一个竞争对手能够跟上IdeaPad 5的步伐。大约7毫秒的黑色到白色和14毫秒的灰色到灰色是其他游戏笔记本电脑中比较有名的。这并不奇怪，因为联想为这台16英寸的笔记本电脑配备了120-Hz的面板。
在亮度方面，IdeaPad也位居前列。平均409cd/m²的亮度是一个非常好的价值，也允许在户外使用它。视角是IPS的典型水平，所以也很宽松。
联想在高色彩准确性方面也值得称赞。在交付状态下，该显示器已经产生了非常自然的色彩，甚至可以通过校准进一步提高。0.32cd/m²的黑值和1,297:1的对比度也让人没有理由抱怨，即使它不足以成为这里的第一名。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 14.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
业绩
IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7的性能可以说是中档。六核处理器应该在未来几年提供足够的性能，就像16GB内存和NVMe SSD。正如预期的那样，这台16英寸设备在3D速度方面显示出一些弱点。
测试条件
预装的联想Vantage软件提供了大量的选项，可以根据你的个人喜好调整系统。在这方面特别相关的是 "电源和性能 "项目，它包括三个配置文件（见屏幕截图）。我们所有的测量都是使用 "智能冷却 "模式，并勾选 "自动切换到高性能模式 "的选项。这应该是为了让系统在高要求的任务中发挥其全部性能，而在简单的任务中，如办公、视频或网络杂务，不会出现不必要的噪音或消耗过多的电力。
处理器
Ryzen 5 6600HS是目前AMD的Rembrandt一代的六核型号，它试图以16MB L3缓存和高达4.5GHz的时钟速度来吸引客户。这款6纳米的芯片能够通过SMT在12个线程上并行工作。AMD规定TDP为35瓦，介于经典性能CPU（超过40瓦）和省电版本（低于30瓦）之间。在我们用Cinebench R15进行的循环测试中，6600HS取得了良好的数据。与许多其他笔记本电脑相比，速度保持非常稳定，这说明了冷却系统的作用。恒定的性能明显领先于 酷睿i7-1260P, 酷睿i7-1165G7, 和 酷睿i7-11370H.AMD芯片的性能更多的是在一个水平上。 酷睿i7-12700H.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
系统性能
根据PCMark 10，IdeaPad 5 Pro在系统性能方面排名第二，仅仅勉强落后于华为MateBook D16。这台电脑在主观上的反应也很舒适快速。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5855 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS () | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
这台16英寸笔记本电脑在延迟方面暴露出一些小的弱点。根据LatencyMon工具，这台笔记本电脑--像它的许多竞争对手一样--并不理想地适合实时处理音频和视频。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
该存储解决方案提供了一个混合性能。虽然我们测量的性能值、连续读写时的速度等都很有说服力，但在用DiskSpd进行长期测试后，我们看到一些强烈的变化。然而，除非你对三星的512GB M.2固态硬盘（PM9A1型号）提出一些持续的苛刻要求，否则你不应该注意到这个问题。
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
由于16ARH7不提供专门的显卡，集成在处理器中的Radeon 660M必须处理所有的图形计算。正如3D测量结果所显示的，其性能与英特尔的一些Tiger Lake 和Alder Lake型号中集成的96 EUs的Iris Xe Graphics G7相似。然而，根据我们的经验，驱动支持将倾向于为AMD说话（关键词：游戏）。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 660M | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7360 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 169560 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24524 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4664 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1776 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 660M (18.5 - 28.6, n=7) | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
| LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 660M (12.3 - 17.9, n=7) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
与CPU的性能相比，GPU的性能在较长的时间内并不稳定。在我们60分钟的测试中，用的测试中，我们看到了一些帧率的变化。Witcher 3(FHD/Ultra)，我们看到了一些帧率的变化，你可以在下面的图表中看到。 另一方面，LG Gram 16不得不在更强大和更频繁的性能跳跃中挣扎。
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 133.9 | 118.5 | 40 | 17.2 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 93.2 | 58.5 | 28.6 | 15.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 114.5 | 98.5 | 65.8 | 55.4 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 53.4 | 23.8 | 16.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 49.2 | 37.4 | 33.8 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 63 | 30 | 26 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 114.4 | 43.3 | 33.9 | 28.6 |
| Hunt Showdown (2020) | 70.8 | 24.2 | 19.2 | |
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 86.9 | 36.2 | 34.2 | |
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 132 | 47.4 | 28.5 | |
| Death Stranding (2020) | 58.1 | 30.6 | 29.1 | |
| Crysis Remastered (2020) | 88.1 | 39.2 | 10.9 | |
| Serious Sam 4 (2020) | 113 | 29.2 | 24.1 | |
| Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 48.2 | 20.7 | 19.1 | |
| Star Wars Squadrons (2020) | 170.4 | 66.6 | 57.4 | |
| Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 49 | 26 | 22 | |
| Dirt 5 (2020) | 68.6 | 24.2 | 17.8 | |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 52 | 26 | 19 | |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) | 64.7 | 21.2 | 21.1 | |
| Hitman 3 (2021) | 91.1 | 34.5 | 30.5 | |
| Outriders (2021) | 35.3 | 30.4 | 27.9 | |
| Resident Evil Village (2021) | 75.3 | 33.4 | 29.9 | |
| Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) | 70 | 38.9 | ||
| Days Gone (2021) | 50 | 25.3 | 22.2 | |
| Deathloop (2021) | 45.5 | 23.3 | 18.1 | |
| Alan Wake Remastered (2021) | 53.6 | 32.7 | 26.4 | |
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 50 | 21 | 18 | |
| Back 4 Blood (2021) | 104.3 | 40.4 | 34.3 | |
| Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | |
| Riders Republic (2021) | 56 | 30 | 23 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 92 | 39 | 32 | |
| Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 102 | 57.1 | 38.9 | |
| Halo Infinite (2021) | 39.6 | 20.3 | 17.1 | |
| God of War (2022) | 21.7 | 17.5 | 12.6 | |
| Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) | 45 | 35 | 30 | |
| Dying Light 2 (2022) | 19.7 | 15.4 | 12.4 | |
| GRID Legends (2022) | 71 | 53.4 | 40.4 | |
| Elden Ring (2022) | 39.6 | 29.9 | 26.9 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 27 | 24 | 15 | |
| Elex 2 (2022) | 22.5 | 19.3 | 15.8 | |
| Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 25.9 | 24 | 23.9 | |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 34.2 | 27 | 17.6 | |
| Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | |
| F1 22 (2022) | 48 | 42 | 28 | |
| The Quarry (2022) | 24.5 | 18 | 14.4 |
排放
噪声排放
IdeaPad 5 Pro在较长的时间内保持非常安静。在空闲运行期间，风扇经常保持关闭状态。当它们打开时，水平相当低，为26至28 dB(A)，这几乎不会使任何人感到不安。在负载情况下，这台16英寸笔记本电脑也相当安静，在《Witcher 3 》和压力测试期间，我们只测量到来自该设备的35分贝（A）。另一方面，在3DMark 06基准测试中，噪音水平有点令人吃惊，风扇转速达到44 dB(A)，对应的噪音水平明显更明显。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 26 / 28 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 44 / 35 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | 1% | 7% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 24.2 3% | 26 -4% | 26 -4% | 23.6 6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 24.2 3% | 26 -4% | 26 -4% | 23.6 6% |
| Idle Average * | 26 | 25.8 1% | 26 -0% | 26 -0% | 23.6 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28 | 30.5 -9% | 27.7 1% | 26 7% | 23.6 16% |
| Load Average * | 44 | 39.8 10% | 32.7 26% | 30.8 30% | 37.7 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35 | 39.8 -14% | 40 -14% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 35 | 39.8 -14% | 39 -11% | 31.1 11% | 40.2 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度发展与竞争对手相似。机箱顶部的最高温度为46 °C（115 °F），底部的最高温度为48 °C（118 °F），既不是特别高也不是特别低。在空闲运行时，整个机箱的温度保持在30 °C (86 °F)以上，因此它非常适合舒适的写作或网上冲浪。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.2 °C / -13 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | -3% | 5% | 22% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46 | 41.8 9% | 40 13% | 46.9 -2% | 39 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 48 | 47.3 1% | 47 2% | 45.1 6% | 34.2 29% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 28.3 -1% | 30.1 -8% | 26.4 6% | 21.2 24% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27 | 30.2 -12% | 31.6 -17% | 24.1 11% | 21.6 20% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
虽然Radeon 660M在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中以1900 MHz的最高速度运行，但在Furmark和Prime95工具的全负荷下，其时钟速度达到了约1060 MHz。同时，Ryzen 5 6600HS达到了约3.0 GHz，而不是3.4 GHz，这对于一个较长的压力情况来说是一个坚实的结果。
演讲者
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
消耗功率
耗电量也不明显。就所提供的性能而言，在空闲运行时4至13瓦，在负载下43至88瓦是可以的。附带的、令人愉快的、紧凑而轻巧的100瓦电源的尺寸是足够的。
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / Watt |
| Idle | 4 / 7 / 13 Watt |
| Load |
61 / 88 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -20% | 18% | 16% | -11% | -35% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 6.1 -53% | 4.8 -20% | 3.8 5% | 6.6 -65% | 6.54 ? -64% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 10.6 -51% | 7.4 -6% | 9 -29% | 8.3 -19% | 11.3 ? -61% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13 | 11.5 12% | 9 31% | 11.3 13% | 9.8 25% | 13.3 ? -2% |
| Load Average * | 61 | 65.5 -7% | 34.9 43% | 35.2 42% | 66 -8% | 70.7 ? -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.8 | 61.2 -43% | 34.9 18% | 52 -21% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 88 | 68.4 22% | 51.4 42% | 43.5 51% | 67.1 24% | 116.1 ? -32% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
除了显示质量外，IdeaPad 5 Pro的另一个优势在于电池寿命。在我们的标准化WLAN测试中，亮度降低到150cd/m²，75瓦的电池（竞争对手：56至80瓦）持续了近10小时。因此，长时间的旅行不应该给笔记本电脑带来任何问题。
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M, 75 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 71 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -28% | -1% | 60% | -19% | 9% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 588 | 424 -28% | 585 -1% | 943 60% | 475 -19% | 640 ? 9% |
| Reader / Idle | 1205 | 1713 | 734 | 1168 ? | ||
| H.264 | 615 | 1204 | 847 ? | |||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 130 | 76.3 ? | ||||
| Load | 103 | 258 | 113 | 97.1 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决书
IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7是一款成功的全能型产品，除了3D应用之外，它总是能达到良好或非常好的效果。
这要从优雅的金属外壳说起，它不是特别轻，但相当坚固，给人以高质量的印象。输入设备也比许多竞争对手的好。键盘和触摸板都很有吸引力和舒适。此外，Ryzen 5 6600HS的性能 Ryzen 5 6600HS很容易跟上英特尔竞争对手的步伐。
充足的电池寿命和明亮的16:10屏幕也赢得了额外的积极分数，它还具有高色彩准确性、短响应和清晰的图像显示（2,560 x 1,600像素）。
简而言之，那些正在寻找一个具有良好显示效果的多功能和移动的16英寸笔记本电脑的人在这里完全是正确的地址。
价格和可用性
例如，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7可从亚马逊购买，价格为1169美元.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7
- 09/20/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
