联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 14 评测--经济实惠的多媒体笔记本电脑，搭载 Zen 4，动力强劲
性能良好，显示效果较弱。
联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 14 是一款经济实惠的多媒体笔记本电脑，配备快速的 AMD 处理器和良好的电池续航能力。不过，它的哑光 IPS 面板只有一半的性能。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - IdeaPad Slim 3 14 配备了令人印象深刻的 Zen 4 SoC
联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 14 是一款经济实惠的多媒体笔记本电脑，其快速的 AMD 处理器、体面的维护选项和良好的电池续航时间尤其令人印象深刻。它甚至有足够的电量来玩一些游戏，但风扇经常会发出声音。该设备的内存可以升级，并有第二个固态硬盘插槽。
一方面，它配备了现代的 Wi-Fi 7 模块，但其 USB 端口甚至不支持 USB 3.2 Gen 2 标准。它的显示屏也是一个薄弱环节，由于色彩空间覆盖范围小、色彩偏差大，你很容易就能看出这是一块廉价的 IPS 面板。而且也不是特别亮。薄弱的扬声器是另一个减分项。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
我们的测试设备的 MRSP 约为 680 美元。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.1%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $9.99 65W 45W AC Charger Fit for L... 2. $8.99 Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design... 3. $14.59 Charger for Lenovo Ideapad 3... List Price: 649€ | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
2. 85.9%  | Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Intel Core 5 220H ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 880€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
3. 80.9%  | Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $25.99 65W 45W Charger Fit for Asus... 2. $20.98 Vaxson 2-Pack Clear Protecto... 3. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... List Price: 700€ | 1.5 kg | 19.7 mm | 14.00" 1920x1080 157 PPI IPS |
4. 83.9%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $575.00 List Price: 800 EUR | 1.4 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
5. 82% v7 (old)  | SCHENKER Work 14 Base Intel Core i5-1235U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 500 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 2. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 3. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... List Price: 720€ | 1.3 kg | 20.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1080 157 PPI IPS |
联想的 IdeaPad Slim 3 是一款价格低廉的 14 英寸笔记本电脑。我们的测试机型号为 83K90004GE，售价约为 680 美元，采用 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS包括 Radeon 780M、16 GB 内存、512 GB 固态硬盘和哑光 IPS 显示屏。但不包括操作系统。
规格
外壳和连接
从外观上看，IdeaPad Slim 3 14 的银色外壳给人留下了很好的印象，铝制显示屏盖更是锦上添花。不过，底座只是由塑料制成，侧面和底盖都有粗糙的纹理。尽管底座相当厚实，但还是会出现明显的扭曲，中间的键盘区域也会很快变形。在我们的测试中，盖子的表现稍好一些，但在这里我们也能通过大量的压力造成图像错误。考虑到价格因素，这还算可以，但 红米笔记本 14的铝合金一体成型结构显然更胜一筹。这款笔记本的铰链非常紧（最大开启角度约为 165 度），单手无法打开盖子。
它的维护选项总体不错--有一个内存插槽和一个空闲的固态硬盘插槽（M.2-2242）。必要时还可以更换 WLAN 模块和电池。说到连接，你只能尽量少用，只有一个 USB-C 接口。不过，这款笔记本电脑使用的是专用充电端口。它的 200 万像素网络摄像头拍照效果不是特别好，但支持 Windows Studio 特效，而且有一个机械快门。此外，它还支持面部识别功能。它不是 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，但可以提供实时字幕。
联想在笔记本的 Wi-Fi 模块上毫不吝啬，采用了 Wi-Fi 7 模块（联发科 MT7925），在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，它拥有超高和稳定的传输速率。它还配备了一个功能齐全的读卡器，最高传输速率可达 90 MB/s。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=15, last 2 years) | |
可持续性
IdeaPad 符合多项环保标准（如 EPEAT Gold、能源之星），但联想没有提供任何有关该设备二氧化碳足迹或二氧化碳补偿的信息。没有关于笔记本电脑使用可回收材料的信息，但其包装几乎可以完全回收。
输入设备 - 背光键盘
IdeaPad 的键盘采用背光设计，布局也没有任何问题，但打字时感觉舒适度一般，因为键盘比较松软。点击板（12.5 x 7 厘米）足够大，手感也不错，但我们的手指在做小动作时偶尔会停滞不前。在下部区域，可以通过机械方式点击键盘，但会发出非常廉价的声音。
显示屏 - 60 赫兹的哑光 IPS 面板
联想使用的是分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素、刷新率为 60 Hz 的雾面 IPS 显示屏。其画质尚可，但你可以清楚地看到这是一款廉价的 IPS 面板，色彩空间覆盖有限，因为色彩显得有些苍白。亮部看起来也略有颗粒感。它没有使用 PWM，响应时间也还不错，但有一些明显的背光出血现象。
我们只在屏幕中央测得了 300 cd/m² 的广告亮度，但面板的平均亮度仅为 280 cd/m²。由于黑度较低，其最大对比度约为 1,300:1，至少还算不错。不过，显示屏的色彩偏差非常大，即使我们自己校准也无法控制，但其灰度显示效果较好。总的来说，与 华硕专家本是对比组中最弱的显示器。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 304 cd/m²
Contrast: 1382:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 4.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
40.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
| 352247 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | 352150 Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 TL140ADXP21-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | 351422 Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA MNE001BS1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | 349467 Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | 345841 SCHENKER Work 14 Base B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 78% | 1% | 122% | 80% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.1 | 72 84% | 39.6 1% | 99.9 155% | 72.4 85% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.4 | 100 71% | 58.9 1% | 100 71% | 99.8 71% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.4 | 72.9 80% | 40.9 1% | 97 140% | 73.8 83% |
| Response Times | 3% | 22% | 95% | -77% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.4 ? | 33.7 ? -7% | 26.6 ? 15% | 1.4 ? 96% | 60 ? -91% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.3 ? | 18.7 ? 12% | 15.4 ? 28% | 1.2 ? 94% | 34.7 ? -63% |
| PWM Frequency | 480 ? | ||||
| Screen | 50% | -4% | 195% | 48% | |
| Brightness middle | 304 | 437 44% | 331 9% | 391 29% | 402 32% |
| Brightness | 281 | 412 47% | 331 18% | 386 37% | 404 44% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 91 2% | 95 7% | 89 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.21 5% | 0.23 -5% | 0.02 91% | 0.16 27% |
| Contrast | 1382 | 2081 51% | 1439 4% | 19550 1315% | 2513 82% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 1.4 76% | 6.8 -15% | 1.89 68% | 2.2 63% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.2 | 2.4 87% | 19.9 -4% | 4.43 77% | 4.2 78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.7 | 1 79% | 4.9 -4% | 1.79 62% | 1.3 72% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 1.8 60% | 6.2 -38% | 1.3 71% | 3 33% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.204 100% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 6098 107% | 6392 102% | 6387 102% | 6411 101% | 6801 96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 44% /
49% | 6% /
1% | 137% /
165% | 17% /
37% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8588 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
尽管面板表面为哑光，但亮度较低，限制了户外使用，尤其是在明亮的日子里。它的视角稳定性还不错，只有在从某个角度观看时才会出现明显的变亮现象。
性能 - AMD Zen 4
在 IdeaPad 内部，AMD 处理器与 8GB 焊接内存相结合。它还配备了一个 SO-DIMM 插槽，在我们的测试设备中，该插槽被另一个 8 GB 插槽占用。因此，它的内存可以升级。联想规定最大内存为 24 GB，但 32 或 48 GB 的更大内存模块也可以使用。
测试条件
我们使用默认激活的智能冷却模式进行了基准测试和测量。
处理器 - Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS处理器使用 8 个 Zen 4 内核（16 个线程），最高主频为 5.1 GHz。该芯片在 IdeaPad 内部的功耗为 33/27 瓦，因此在这里使用 U 系列处理器就足够了。其多核性能在同类产品中非常出色，最重要的是完全稳定；只有在单核测试中 酷睿 5 220H(Raptor Lake Refresh）在 红米笔记本 14稍快。在电池模式下，功率限制略低于 25/22 瓦，这影响了它的多核性能（-14%）。更多 CPU 基准测试请参见 我们的技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (12359 - 14060, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (1719 - 1746, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (4788 - 5556, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (649 - 681, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (1934 - 2244, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (261 - 270, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (226 - 297, n=5) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (49930 - 61047, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (5702 - 6493, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (9922 - 11700, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (2477 - 2602, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (9229 - 10884, n=5) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (1822 - 1946, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (13.1 - 17.4, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (46.7 - 55.4, n=5) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (0.439 - 0.4774, n=5) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (17814 - 22477, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (71472 - 93550, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (3559 - 4132, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (90515 - 111581, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (12168 - 13731, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (38404 - 49687, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (60328 - 76247, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (468 - 930, n=5) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (9368 - 11880, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (31491 - 35861, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
系统性能
IdeaPad Slim 3 14 在日常使用中反应非常灵敏，基准测试结果也不错。在测试过程中，我们没有发现系统稳定性方面的问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (6775 - 7213, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10178 - 11449, n=5) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11331, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9706 - 10449, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (8519 - 9163, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1643 - 1698, n=5) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1605 - 1666, n=5) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1739 - 1863, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2210, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1334 - 1498, n=5) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (297 - 440, n=5) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (246 - 257, n=5) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (518 - 563, n=5) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6775 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 108756, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (62098 - 76766, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (50273 - 61739, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (78025 - 107658, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (91 - 122.4, n=5) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
IdeaPad 有两个快速 PCIe 4.0 x4 插槽，用于安装紧凑型 M.2-2242 SSD。我们的测试设备安装的是 512 GB 版本的 Micron 2500，在测试过程中实现了非常高的传输速率。不过，在连续负载的情况下，它的性能并不稳定，但在日常使用中，这种影响应该是有限的。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Radeon 780M Radeon 780MRadeon 780M 仍然是一款速度极快的集成显卡，在执行日常任务（包括播放高分辨率视频）时毫无问题。在基准测试中，IdeaPad 明显领先于对比设备，甚至其游戏性能也不差。在 1080p 分辨率和中等细节的情况下，尤其是较老的游戏通常都能流畅运行，特别是在较长时间的游戏过程中，其游戏性能也能保持稳定。不过，在电池模式下，它的电池电量不足（-4%）。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11203 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6791 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2863 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 407 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2447 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 2437 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=59) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 -1! | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base -2! | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA -1! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=39, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (12.1 - 31.1, n=36, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Work 14 Base | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 149 | 136.6 | 55.3 | 23.6 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 138.2 | 108.1 | 83.9 | 76.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 67.9 | 35.7 | 24.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 60.8 | 43.8 | 36.1 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 140.6 | 58.8 | 49.2 | 42 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 33.1 | 26.1 | 20.9 | 20.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 30 | 23.9 | 19.6 | 16.8 |
排放与动力
噪音排放
一个风扇负责笔记本电脑的散热，尽管它的功率限制较低，但在日常使用中启动速度很快，你经常可以听到安静的嘶嘶声（约 27 dB(A)）。在较高负载情况下，我们测得游戏时的噪音在 38 dB（A）之间，CPU 高负载或压力测试时的最大噪音为 40.8 dB（A）。测试设备上没有其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.2 / 24.2 / 26.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40.8 / 40.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A) | ||
| 352247 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | 352150 Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Core 5 220H, YMTC PC411-1TB | 351422 Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i5-13420H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-512G-1002 | 349467 Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Radeon 740M, R5 7540U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK | 345841 SCHENKER Work 14 Base Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | 8% | -0% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 24.2 | 23.6 2% | 23.6 2% | 24 1% | 23.6 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.2 | 23.6 2% | 23.6 2% | 25 -3% | 23.6 2% |
| Idle Average * | 24.2 | 23.6 2% | 23.6 2% | 27 -12% | 23.6 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.8 | 25.7 4% | 23.7 12% | 29 -8% | 24.8 7% |
| Load Average * | 40.8 | 31.9 22% | 28.7 30% | 37 9% | 34.2 16% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 38 | 34.4 9% | 34.3 10% | 37 3% | |
| Load Maximum * | 40.8 | 34.4 16% | 41.4 -1% | 38 7% | 42.9 -5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在测试过程中，其表面温度总体很低；在高负载情况下，只有底部（中央上部区域）有一个很小的热点，我们测得的温度超过 50 °C。不过，底座的顶部温度很低，在使用过程中没有任何限制。在 CPU/GPU 综合负载的压力测试中，SoC 很快稳定在 22 瓦，并保持在这一水平。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.5 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.8 °C / 78.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+2.4 °C / 4.4 F).
| 352247 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | 352150 Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Intel Core 5 220H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | 351422 Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA Intel Core i5-13420H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | 349467 Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M | 345841 SCHENKER Work 14 Base Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 8% | 2% | 1% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38.3 | 38.6 -1% | 41.2 -8% | 39 -2% | 39.2 -2% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51.5 | 45.1 12% | 44.4 14% | 46 11% | 40.4 22% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.8 | 24.4 5% | 26.7 -3% | 28 -9% | 25.3 2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.5 | 24.6 17% | 28 5% | 29 2% | 25.8 13% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器可以发出相当大的声音，但声音非常微弱，除了会议之外，您确实应该使用外置扬声器或耳机。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER Work 14 Base audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
IdeaPad Slim 3 14 总体而言是一款非常节俭的设备，其 65 瓦的电源即使在负载情况下也完全够用。该设备自然得益于屏幕的低亮度和处理器适中的功耗限制。
| Off / Standby | 0.16 / 0.41 Watt |
| Idle | 3.3 / 6.3 / 6.8 Watt |
| Load |
45.7 / 51.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| 352247 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | 352150 Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Core 5 220H, YMTC PC411-1TB | 351422 Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i5-13420H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-512G-1002 | 349467 Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Radeon 740M, R5 7540U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK | 345841 SCHENKER Work 14 Base Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -19% | -18% | 3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 3.3 -0% | 3.7 -12% | 5 -52% | 3.7 -12% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 8.4 -33% | 8.3 -32% | 6 5% | 6.8 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.8 | 9.6 -41% | 8.6 -26% | 10 -47% | 7.2 -6% |
| Load Average * | 45.7 | 51.9 -14% | 52.5 -15% | 41 10% | 31.8 30% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 38.2 | 51 -34% | 42.8 -12% | 42.5 -11% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 35.8 | 51 -42% | 41.1 -15% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 51.7 | 63.2 -22% | 63.2 -22% | 58 -12% | 47.2 9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 31 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
得益于 60 Wh 的电池，IdeaPad 可以实现非常出色的续航时间，在同类产品中也遥遥领先。在 150 cd/m²（相当于我们测试设备最大亮度的 73%）的 WLAN 测试中，我们测得的时间为 10:43 小时，在全亮度下为 09:10 小时。在 150 cd/m² 的视频测试中，我们甚至记录了 14 个小时。在设备打开的情况下，充满电需要 129 分钟（85 分钟后达到 80%）。
| 352247 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | 352150 Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025 Core 5 220H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 56 Wh | 351422 Asus ExpertBook B1 B1403CVA i5-13420H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 50 Wh | 349467 Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M, 60 Wh | 345841 SCHENKER Work 14 Base i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 49 Wh | -5 Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -9% | -34% | -8% | -29% | 13% | |
| H.264 | 840 | 933 ? 11% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 643 | 587 -9% | 422 -34% | 590 -8% | 458 -29% | 733 ? 14% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 AHP G10
- 03/04/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
