Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarLG Ultra PC 14回顾。耐力与性能的结合
在回顾了16英寸Ultra PC之后，我们现在来看看它的小麻烦。14英寸的设备是一个克的替代品，它有很好的电池寿命，但并不是要尽可能的轻？我们现在已经可以告诉你，答案是肯定的。在启用Wi-Fi的情况下，Ultra PC 14可持续使用约17小时，在耐力方面超过了克14。
那么这就是关于该产品的全部内容了，对吗？当然不是。我们毕竟是在测试一个更昂贵的模型，它有一个 AMD Ryzen 7 5825U(25瓦)和16GB的内存。这款笔记本电脑不仅超过了英特尔的同类产品，而且在持续负载下与配备名义上更强大的最新一代45瓦处理器的设备处于同一水平。
根据规格的不同，Ultra PC的价格在800至1350欧元（870至1470美元）之间。在这个价格范围内，你会发现有一大堆采用AMD或英特尔处理器的轻薄便携式笔记本电脑。联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6具有高清晰的显示屏，是一个高档的选择，你应该看一下。与Acer Swift 3 SF314和 惠普Pavilion Plus 14，提供更多性能（单核）的45瓦处理器已经进入14英寸笔记本电脑。
其他LG笔记本电脑评论。
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.6 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G R7 5825U, Vega 8 | 1.3 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 86.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 980 g | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 83.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 85.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
| 87.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 i5-12500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 85.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 85.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR R5 5625U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 18.37 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 |
外壳和规格
克和超PC系列之间有什么区别吗？是的。例如，它们在重量（980克对1.29公斤，或2.16磅对2.84磅）和铰链设计方面有所不同（Ultra PC使用金属铰链，而gram上的铰链是隐藏的）。Ultra PC是由塑料而不是镁制成的，由于内部有强大的垂直和水平加固装置，它的底盘更硬。除材料外，Ultra PC有一个72Wh的电池，比LG gram中使用的特殊轻质电池更重。
底座部分和显示屏表现出一些适度的弯曲。与16英寸Ultra PC一样，轻轻扭转显示屏会立即导致TFT面板上出现明显的变色--这次不是在下边缘，而是在整个屏幕的上半部分。这种现象在某种程度上也出现在移动显示器时。也就是说，它不会对使用产生负面影响，而且当设备放在腿上或摇晃时也不明显。
说到端口，我们对Ultra PC 16的评价也适用于此：你可以使用USB-C充电器，而不是带桶形插头的65瓦适配器为设备供电（我们测试了45瓦和65瓦充电器）。
Ultra PC 14配备了一个英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX200（带蓝牙5.1）。该模块的性能不如Ultra PC 16中的模块 ，在发射和接收率方面都不尽如人意。这两款Ultra PC上的读卡器提供了相同的速度。
14英寸的笔记本电脑与其16英寸的大哥共享相同的内部设计。唯一不同的是，这些部件被更紧密地排列在一起。看来这两款笔记本电脑使用了相同的主板；扬声器、电池和I/O板似乎也是相同的。有第二个SSD插槽可用于存储扩展，但内存是焊接的，无法升级。要打开这个设备，你只需要一把小的十字头螺丝刀。一旦螺丝被解开，底板实际上就会自己抬起来。
在德国，LG为LG Ultra PC 14提供两年的保修期，并可选择以50欧元（54美元）延长至三年。保修条款和条件可能因国家而异。例如，美国的标准保修期只有一年。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 (AV PRO V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 (AV PRO V60) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
输入设备
Ultra PC 14的键盘没有背光，而且缺乏数字键盘。我们不能向那些经常打字的人全心全意地推荐这个键盘。尽管按键提供了很好的、清晰的阻力，但键盘在中间会弯曲。这使用户无法快速打字，并降低了笔记本电脑的质量感。触摸板的尺寸与16英寸超极本上的触摸板相同（13.2 x 8.2厘米，或5.2 x 3.2英寸）。它有一个明显的行程，一个明显的启动点和一个适度响亮的点击。
显示
不同于 Ultra PC 16采用的是LG面板，14英寸机型配备的是京东方的显示屏（NV140WUM-N44）。宽屏面板（1,920 x 1,200，16:10）同样存在黑屏的背光渗漏问题--这次主要是在下边缘。
Ultra PC的显示屏是哑光的，不反光，但LG gram笔记本电脑的屏幕分辨率更高（2,560 x 1,600）。我们的评测模型支持AMD Vari-Bright，它可以根据显示的内容来调整屏幕亮度。这个功能可以根据需要禁用。在331cd/m²，Ultra PC 14的峰值亮度高于Gram 14和Ultra PC 16。 Ultra PC 16.
我们测量了9和16毫秒的响应时间，这对于IPS面板来说是很好的、相当标准的数值。另一个积极的方面是，该显示器没有表现出任何PWM闪烁的现象。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 335 cd/m²
Contrast: 1595:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
40.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G BOE NV140WUM-N44, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | LG Gram 14Z90Q LG LP140WU1-SPF1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 LEN140WUXGA+, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 Samsung SDC4171 (ATNA40YK07-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng BOE0929, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr Samsung SDC4170, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 109% | 78% | 119% | 72% | 122% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.6 | 98.4 148% | 72.2 82% | 98.05 148% | 69.3 75% | 99.9 152% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.6 | 99.9 70% | 99.5 70% | 99.63 70% | 98.5 68% | 100 71% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.9 | 85.9 110% | 74.3 82% | 97.22 138% | 70.4 72% | 98.9 142% |
| Response Times | -185% | -237% | 67% | -146% | 88% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16 ? | 47.5 ? -197% | 45.2 ? -183% | 44.9 ? -181% | 1.2 ? 92% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9 ? | 24.5 ? -172% | 35.2 ? -291% | 3 ? 67% | 18.9 ? -110% | 1.4 ? 84% |
| PWM Frequency | 360 | 357 ? | ||||
| Screen | 2% | 12% | 116% | 20% | 31% | |
| Brightness middle | 335 | 341 2% | 310.6 -7% | 389 16% | 451 35% | 388.3 16% |
| Brightness | 331 | 305 -8% | 302 -9% | 389 18% | 439 33% | 391 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 87 9% | 92 15% | 98 23% | 92 15% | 98 23% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.26 -24% | 0.22 -5% | 0.029 86% | 0.31 -48% | |
| Contrast | 1595 | 1312 -18% | 1412 -11% | 13414 741% | 1455 -9% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.54 | 3.11 44% | 2.67 52% | 3.51 37% | 2.46 56% | 4.51 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.31 | 8.29 57% | 4.54 76% | 6.87 64% | 4.24 78% | 7.06 63% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.92 | 0.83 83% | 2.33 53% | 2.11 57% | 1.32 73% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.32 | 5.3 -128% | 3.7 -59% | 2.2 5% | 3.5 -51% | 1.2 48% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.037 108% | 2.12 104% | 2.16 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 6870 95% | 7571 86% | 6398 102% | 6320 103% | 7289 89% | 6290 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-2% | -49% /
-10% | 101% /
113% | -18% /
8% | 80% /
66% |
* ... smaller is better
在我们比较的设备中，Ultra PC 14的sRGB覆盖率最差。这可能与色彩准确性至关重要的应用有关。屏幕的1,600:1的对比度比竞争对手的能力要高一些，甚至超过了Gram 14。我们设法通过校准提高了色彩准确性，特别是灰度（Delta E从2.3降至0.7）。你可以在上面的方框中下载我们创建的颜色配置文件。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
业绩
我们的评测设备配备了一个八核处理器-- AMD Ryzen 7 5825U(2.0 GHz，提升时钟可达4.5 GHz，L3缓存16 MB)。也有配备六核CPU（Ryzen 5625U）的低价型号。采用Ryzen 5或7的机型标配16GB内存（双通道）。
测试条件
LG智能助手现在可用于电源管理。在软件中，我们为基准测试将冷却模式设置为高，为电池寿命测试设置为低。我们将Radeon软件留在其默认设置中，这意味着省电的fps限制器被禁用。同样地，我们关闭了AMD Vari-Bright。在Windows中，所有省电模式被禁用，电源计划被设置为 "最佳性能"。对于电池寿命测试，我们允许Windows电池保护程序在平衡模式下运行。
处理器
凭借其8个内核和16个线程，... AMD Ryzen 7 5825U(TDP: 25 watts)将笔记本电脑变成了一个真正的工作机器。在我们的比较中，Ryzen CPU提供了出色的性能。它能够在持续负载下与英特尔酷睿i7-12500H（45瓦）保持同步，并且单核性能略高于酷睿i5-1135G7（28瓦）。但正如预期的那样，AMD Ryzen 7 5825U在多线程测试中表现更好，能够充分发挥其潜力。
当循环运行Cinebench R15 Multi时，Ryzen最初的得分是1800分，随后稳定在1600分的平均分。这款 酷睿i5-1240P在LG gram 14中的Core i5-1240P落后了相当多的分数，Ryzen的性能要好80-90%。
请参考我们的CPU比较表了解更多信息和基准测试。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G -2! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 -2! | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (9339 - 10904, n=4) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (1433 - 1460, n=4) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (3645 - 4180, n=4) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (547 - 567, n=4) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (1575 - 1860, n=4) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (228 - 232, n=4) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (281 - 322, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (42883 - 49511, n=4) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (5208 - 5468, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (5827 - 7367, n=3) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (1438 - 1496, n=3) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (11.1 - 13.4, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (52.8 - 66.6, n=4) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (0.515 - 0.536, n=4) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (10886 - 12710, n=4) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (69640 - 80383, n=4) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (2315 - 2738, n=4) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (84150 - 94210, n=4) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (10550 - 11551, n=4) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (38353 - 44537, n=4) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (40933 - 108712, n=4) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (621 - 708, n=4) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (5758 - 6675, n=4) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (9627 - 19826, n=4) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
在整个PCMark 10中，我们的评测设备取得了优异的成绩，甚至可以与那些 HPPavilion Plus 14(45瓦的系统)。相比之下，配备Core i5的LG gram 14在性能评级中只得了一半的分数。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (5337 - 6228, n=4) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (9553 - 10879, n=4) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (8717 - 9516, n=4) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4954 - 6372, n=4) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1124 - 1330, n=4) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1189 - 1351, n=4) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1169 - 1439, n=4) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (843 - 1088, n=4) | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6030 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (21188 - 42917, n=4) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (24018 - 39413, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (23602 - 41720, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (85.9 - 105.9, n=4) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示，当我们在Microsoft Edge中保持几个浏览器标签打开并回放我们的4K YouTube演示视频时，延迟有适度增加。平均而言，在视频播放期间，iGPU的使用率为6％。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
我们的Ultra PC在存储性能方面排在最后。三星PM991a硬盘在任何一项分项测试中都不是一个高分选手。考虑到这一点，这台笔记本电脑在PCMark 10中的分项得分高得令人吃惊。然而，CrossMark能够发现缓慢的固态硬盘，并且大多将评测单元置于最底层。正如你在DiskSpd图表中所看到的，固态硬盘在负载下的性能有适度的下降，但这并不奇怪。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
由于搭载了AMD Radeon RX Vega 8，Ultra PC提供了高于平均水平的图形性能，在我们的比较中超过了所有英特尔iGPU--至少在整体结果方面。Radeon iGPU在涉及子分数时处于中间位置，如Fire Strike 和Time Spy 。在任何情况下，LG gram 14（英特尔Xe Graphics G7 80EUs）在合成基准测试中大约慢15至20%。
在真正的游戏中，Vega 8对iGPU有相当好的表现，尽管其性能水平较低，在超便携产品中相当平均。这款笔记本电脑可以在最低或中等设置下流畅地运行旧游戏。在我们的测试中，Witcher 3 ，在设置为Ultra的情况下只运行了大约15帧，但至少帧率没有随着时间推移而下降。根据WiFiNFO的日志，CPU以恒定的3,900 MHz运行，而iGPU以2,000 MHz开始，在达到90°C（194°F）时节流到1,700 MHz。
请参考我们的GPU比较表了解更多信息和基准测试。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 25949 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6800 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25781 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3742 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1498 points | |
Help | ||
Witcher 3 FPS graph
| low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 86 | 24.8 | |||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 75.3 | 50.4 | 24.1 | 15.2 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 134.4 | 119.5 | 70.9 | 66.1 | 14.5 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 34.8 | 18.3 | 13.1 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 62 | 38.4 | 34.5 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 82 | 32 | 25.6 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 19 | 14 |
排放和电力消耗
噪声排放
从我们的测量结果来看，LG超便携笔记本电脑在办公室使用时（如基于浏览器的应用程序）是完全安静的，但在有活动时，风扇从未停止运行。在负载情况下，不管是运行压力测试还是游戏，单个风扇都会大幅旋转--我们从设备上测得的噪音约为45dB(A)。基于英特尔的LG gram 14在这方面明显更安静，但这是可以预期的，因为gram的性能更低。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 26.8 / 27.2 / 27.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45.4 / 45.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A) | ||
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G Vega 8, R7 5825U, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB | LG Gram 14Z90Q Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 Vega 7, R5 5600U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-12500H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3GX013N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | 11% | 10% | 14% | |
| off / environment * | 26 | 25 4% | 24.6 5% | 25.15 3% | 23.3 10% |
| Idle Minimum * | 26.8 | 26 3% | 24.6 8% | 25.15 6% | 23.5 12% |
| Idle Average * | 27.2 | 27 1% | 24.6 10% | 25.15 8% | 23.5 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.2 | 28 -3% | 25.1 8% | 25.15 8% | 23.5 14% |
| Load Average * | 45.4 | 35 23% | 29.6 35% | 35.6 22% | 32 30% |
| Load Maximum * | 45.5 | 36 21% | 45.5 -0% | 40.3 11% | 44.3 3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36 | 31.9 | 35.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑在闲置时几乎不产生任何热量。我们测量时，其表面仅比室温高2-3℃（3.6-5℉）。在压力测试期间，机箱上的温度在某些位置上升到44-45℃（111-113℉）。这在大腿上是可以容忍的，因为较热的地方在设备的后面。
在压力测试期间，CPU和GPU的频率有大幅下降。在这种情况下，SoC的两个部分都在同时工作，同时不得不分享适度的TDP。CPU和iGPU开始时分别为30瓦和25瓦，然后随着测试的进行下降到20瓦和18瓦。在此期间，核心温度保持在大约90°C（194°F）。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.4 °C / -4.4 F).
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | LG Gram 14Z90Q Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 Intel Core i5-12500H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR AMD Ryzen 5 5625U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | -11% | 6% | -8% | -5% | 8% | -6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44.1 | 43 2% | 42 5% | 35.8 19% | 43 2% | 41 7% | 39.4 11% | 39.1 11% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45.1 | 45 -0% | 45 -0% | 42.8 5% | 45.6 -1% | 43 5% | 33.8 25% | 41.9 7% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.4 | 27 -6% | 34 -34% | 25 2% | 29.5 -16% | 29 -14% | 25 2% | 31.2 -23% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.9 | 28 -8% | 30 -16% | 26.2 -1% | 30.3 -17% | 30 -16% | 27.6 -7% | 30.9 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
这两个扬声器的声音相当体面，但缺乏低音。为了获得更好的听觉体验，我们建议使用一副耳机或外部扬声器。内置的双阵列麦克风最能产生无噪音的录音。
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
相对于其竞争对手，LG笔记本电脑的功耗相当不错。在我们的测试中，它在空闲状态下需要大约3.6到7.8瓦，在负载状态下平均需要46瓦，尽管它的用电量确实达到51瓦的峰值。这比我们比较中的基于英特尔的设备的功耗要高得多。紧凑的65瓦适配器能够轻松地处理这一水平的使用。
| Off / Standby | 0.14 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle | 3.6 / 6.4 / 7.8 Watt |
| Load |
46 / 51 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
LG Ultra PC 14配备了72Wh的电池，是我们比较中最大的一个。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，我们的评测设备在近17小时后才关闭。我们将屏幕亮度降低了四级，使其保持在150cd/m²的标准水平。在电池运行时，系统并没有节流，这导致了Battery Eater仅在令人失望的137分钟后就停止了。
| LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G R7 5825U, Vega 8, 72 Wh | LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 72 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 56.5 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7, 57 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 i5-12500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63.3 Wh | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 51 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR R5 5625U, Vega 7, 54 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | -56% | -51% | -61% | -21% | -54% | -24% | -22% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1008 | 712 -29% | 442 -56% | 550 -45% | 312 -69% | 792 -21% | 274 -73% | 770 -24% | 719 ? -29% |
| Load | 137 | 169 23% | 60 -56% | 66 -52% | 89 -35% | 116.6 ? -15% | |||
| Reader / Idle | 1736 | 1298 | 506 | 1750 ? | |||||
| H.264 | 426 | 896 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论--更有耐力
这是我们早在评测时的结论。 超强PC 16：对于预算紧张的人来说，Ultra PC系列不是LG gram的替代品。这是因为gram系列的主要亮点（即尽可能保持轻盈）并不适用于Ultra PC。14英寸的Ultra PC比其14英寸的gram对应产品重了高达360克（0.8磅）。不过除此之外，Ultra PC给人的感觉就像是克的复制品，电池寿命明显更长，设计也更简单。
以预算价格获得最大的电池寿命？如果你想要一台拥有明亮的亚光显示屏的笔记本电脑，而且一次可以使用17个小时，你应该看看LG Ultra PC 14。没有其他竞争对手甚至接近于提供这么多的外出耐力。
基于Ryzen 7的系统有很好的性能，即使在持续负荷下也能利用。然而，这也伴随着相当多的噪音。这款笔记本电脑的另一个优势是它的空M.2插槽，可以添加一个固态硬盘。太糟糕了，内存不能扩展（板载）。
在缺点方面，我们注意到显示屏在显示黑色图像时出现了变色和轻微的屏幕出血。底线是显示屏很亮，有很好的对比度，但你不应该期望它能再现宽广的色域。
在我们看来，这款笔记本电脑正在与联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6等产品竞争。 惠普Pavilion Plus 14和 Acer Swift 3 SF314.这三款设备都有一个同样是亚光的高清晰显示屏，其中一些设备配备了强大的45瓦的SoC（惠普和宏碁的特点是i5-12500H）。但联想、惠普和宏基的笔记本电脑大约重100至200克（0.22至0.44磅）。
价格和可用性
目前在数码港已经没有评测模型，但你可以从LG德国直接获得它，1,350欧元（约1,465美元）。.另外，具有相同规格的16英寸版本可以以€1,099/1,299美元从LG的网上商店或Cyberport.
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G
- 01/25/2023 v7 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
