LG Ultra PC 16 (2022) AMD评论。这不是一个克。
LG的gram笔记本电脑轻巧、安静、超便携。它们有14、16或17英寸的屏幕(不再有15英寸的型号),并带有一个高端价格标签。不是每个人都能负担得起或愿意购买价格超过1,500欧元(1,480美元)的笔记本电脑。
那么,一个精简的LG gram怎么样呢?嗯,它被称为Ultra PC--一款重量略高于克的笔记本电脑(1.6公斤而不是1.19公斤),并配备了AMD的CPU。那么,16英寸的设备是否一定是劣质的选择?在检查了LG Ultra PC 16英寸的配置后,我们认为对所有人来说都不是这样的。 Ryzen 3 5300U,8GB内存和512GB固态硬盘存储。价格略低于900欧元(887美元),我们的审查单位是该阵容中最小和最便宜的模型。
更多LG笔记本电脑评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6 | 1.6 kg | 16.3 mm | 16.00" | 1280x1200 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
84.7 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.6 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.7 kg | 19.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Honor MagicBook 16 2022 R5 5600H, Vega 7 | 1.8 kg | 18.2 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - Ultra PC的重量为400克
那么,克和Ultra PC在哪些方面有所不同?而且,尽管这两款设备的外观非常相似,但为什么Ultra PC的重量却明显增加了呢?Ultra PC的机身是由塑料制成的,而不是镁合金。该设备还使用标准的72Wh电池,而不是能量密度更高的轻型电池。因此,这两款笔记本电脑的电池尺寸相同,但重量不同。
坚硬的镁合金在克重上能够应对只有初级的内部加固。但这也意味着机箱有一些弯曲。相比之下,Ultra PC更结实。它的塑料底座需要强大的垂直和水平加固。因此,我们的评测单元上的显示屏和底座部分的弯曲度都比克拉克上的同类产品要小。稍微扭动显示屏就会在屏幕的下边缘造成明显的背光渗漏。背光出血甚至在某种程度上发生在显示器被移动时。
这两款设备的显示屏铰链的连接方式也不同。Ultra PC在中间有一个明显的铰链,而gram则有一个隐藏的铰链,消失在笔记本电脑的机身后面。两台笔记本电脑的屏幕都可以向后倾斜140度。虽然可以用一只手稍微打开盖子,但你必须握住底座才能进一步向后移动。
Ultra PC的重量正好是1,600克(3.53磅)--比16年的克重多出400克(0.88磅)。如前所述,这是由于笔记本电脑的标准电池和塑料机身造成的。从外观上看,Ultra PC在宽度、深度和高度上都比gram稍大一些。但请记住,我们在这里讨论的是不到一毫米的差异。
正如 宏碁Swift 3 SF316-51,一些竞争对手也可以相当苗条。宏碁笔记本电脑的厚度只有15.9毫米(0.63英寸),但重量却多出100克(0.22磅)。在1.6公斤(3.53磅)的时候, 戴尔Inspiron 15 5515与Ultra PC的重量相同。然而,它明显更厚,有18毫米(0.71英寸),而不是16.3毫米(0.64英寸)。简而言之:在重量和厚度方面,Ultra PC能够与相同价格范围内的其他设备竞争。
特点 - 带有快速Wi-Fi的Windows笔记本电脑
LG为这款16英寸设备配备了两个USB-A端口(USB 3.1 Gen2)和一个USB-C端口(PD,DisplayPort 15瓦)。你可以通过USB-C端口为笔记本电脑供电(用45瓦和65瓦的充电器测试)。为了避免占用充电的端口,制造商提供了一个65瓦的电源适配器,带有一个小小的桶状插头。
笔记本电脑可以连接到最多两个外部显示器(通过HDMI和DisplayPort)。与基于英特尔的gram 16一样,Ultra PC不支持Thunderbolt 4,这意味着它最多只能与USB-C 3.1坞站兼容。电源可以通过扩展坞输送给笔记本电脑,只要它支持65瓦的电源直通。左边和右边的端口位于笔记本电脑的背面,使掌托旁边的区域没有电缆。
SD卡阅读器
SD卡读卡器的性能相当一般。它能够以大约75MB/s的速度传输照片,这与基于英特尔的克16上看到的性能水平非常相似。这个价格范围内的许多笔记本电脑的SD读卡器的连接速度较慢,如我们比较的联想和戴尔。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
连接性
Ultra PC中的英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX200模块支持802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax标准并提供蓝牙5.1功能。在最佳条件下(周围没有其他Wi-Fi设备,笔记本电脑和服务器之间距离较短),该模块产生的结果低于规格中的速度。然而,由于上传和下载速度分别为1300和1500Mbits/s,Ultra PC完全不必在竞争中退缩。Wi-Fi模块与沿边框的两根天线相连。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头(0.9MP)的最大分辨率为1,280 x 720。它缺乏色彩准确度,正如21的高平均Delta E所显示的那样。笔记本电脑的摄像头在大多数情况下并不出色,但 Acer Swift 3 SF316-51表明至少有可能通过拥有一个Delta E为10的网络摄像头而做得更好。理想情况下,Delta E应该低于3。
辅料
除了通常的文件(保修信息、快速入门指南),这台笔记本电脑只配备了一个65瓦的电源适配器。
维护和软件
取下底盖后,你可以接触到内部结构。在五个橡胶脚的下面各有一个螺丝(粘在上面)。另外三颗螺丝被小盖子(粘在上面)所隐藏。盖子可以用平头螺丝刀拆下,脚则用塑料铲子拆下。一旦螺丝被卸下,底盖就可以很容易地从笔记本电脑上抬起来。
软件
担保
在德国,LG为16英寸的设备提供两年的保修期,并可选择延长保修期至三年,费用约为50欧元(50美元)。在美国,保修期为一年。保修条件可能因国家而异。
输入设备 - 对经常打字的人来说不是最佳选择
数字键盘、小方向键和黑键--Ultra PC上的键盘几乎与克16上的键盘相同。嗯,只是几乎一样。Gram的键盘有背光,但Ultra PC没有。因此,按键上的字体也是不同的。我们的评测单元上的字体是印上去的,而gram的键盘上的字母和数字由于有背光,是半透明的。
键盘
Chiclet键盘上平坦、光滑的按键具有较短的行程和非常明显的启动点。我们喜欢按键提供的清晰的阻力。在打字时,键盘表现出一些弯曲,特别是在中间和右侧,一直延伸到数字键盘。这阻碍了快速打字,并使键盘感觉不那么高级,因为你不能简单地按下键。总而言之,LG提供了一个足以满足日常使用的键盘,但我们不能向经常打字的人推荐它。
触摸板
点击板的光滑表面(13.2 x 8.2厘米,或5.2 x 3.2英寸)使手指能够轻松地滑过。点击板的四角也对输入作出反应。它有一个明显的点击深度(在下半部),一个明显的启动点和一个适度响亮的点击。
显示屏 - IPS面板,有云层
LG在Ultra PC上使用自己的面板(LG Display LP160WU1-SPH1)。对于专业用户和户外爱好者来说,这款笔记本电脑配备的是哑光显示屏,而不是像gram 16那样的光面显示屏,这是一个好消息。虽然Ultra PC与gram 16共享相同的16:10长宽比,但屏幕分辨率已经从gram的2,560 x 1,600降低到1,920 x 1,200。
像往常一样,AMD的CPU与Radeon软件一起工作。Vari-Bright可以根据屏幕上的内容调整显示亮度,默认情况下是启用的。但我们在测试显示屏和电池寿命时禁用了它。Ultra PC没有环境光传感器。显示器的峰值亮度低于平均水平,为269 cd/m²。1,128:1的对比度使该面板与竞争对手处于同一水平。然而,它的对比度低于LG.Philips在16号克的面板。
该显示器的响应时间不长,大约为28至38毫秒。但是,话说回来,这款笔记本电脑并不是为游戏而设计的。只有少数16英寸设备在这方面可以表现得更好。一个例子是 Honor MagicBook 16 2022,其显示屏的响应时间为10至17毫秒。一个积极的事情是,我们没有发现屏幕上有任何PWM闪烁。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 299 cd/m²
Contrast: 1128:1 (Black: 0.265 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 5.02
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.6
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G LG Display LP160WU1-SPH1, IPS, 1280x1200, 16" | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | LG Gram 16 (2021) LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F BOE NV15N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Honor MagicBook 16 2022 NV161FHM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 84% | 124% | 1% | 5% | 85% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 36 | 66.6 85% | 95.8 166% | 36.58 2% | 68.4 90% | |
sRGB Coverage | 55 | 99.5 81% | 99.8 81% | 54.37 -1% | 59 7% | 98.9 80% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 37 | 68.5 85% | 83.8 126% | 37.79 2% | 38 3% | 68.6 85% |
Response Times | 23% | 7% | -14% | 30% | 60% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 32 ? 16% | 44 ? -16% | 44 ? -16% | 29 ? 24% | 16.8 ? 56% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 20 ? 29% | 20 ? 29% | 31 ? -11% | 18 ? 36% | 10.4 ? 63% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 1250 ? | ||||
Screen | 34% | 2% | -8% | -43% | 19% | |
Brightness middle | 299 | 304 2% | 331 11% | 251 -16% | 376 26% | 342 14% |
Brightness | 270 | 284 5% | 309 14% | 241 -11% | 341 26% | 329 22% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 88 4% | 88 4% | 87 2% | 78 -8% | 92 8% |
Black Level * | 0.265 | 0.165 38% | 0.22 17% | 0.23 13% | 0.66 -149% | 0.29 -9% |
Contrast | 1128 | 1842 63% | 1505 33% | 1091 -3% | 570 -49% | 1179 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.57 | 1.44 68% | 4.64 -2% | 5.14 -12% | 6.4 -40% | 3.2 30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.92 | 3.62 59% | 9.82 -10% | 18.41 -106% | 20.45 -129% | 5.5 38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.02 | 3.16 37% | 0.9 82% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 2.6 32% | 6.9 -82% | 1.08 72% | 4.59 -21% | 4.5 -18% |
Gamma | 2.6 85% | 2.41 91% | 2.34 94% | 2.43 91% | 2.26 97% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6142 106% | 6527 100% | 7904 82% | 6534 99% | 6819 95% | 7610 85% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 68.5 | 75.1 | 37.79 | 38 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.5 | 100 | 54.37 | 59 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 47% /
44% | 44% /
29% | -7% /
-7% | -3% /
-23% | 55% /
39% |
* ... smaller is better
IPS面板的色彩覆盖率相当乏善可陈。它甚至不能完全覆盖相对较小的sRGB色彩空间(55%)。虽然不是所有的竞争对手都更好,但其中有三个在色彩覆盖方面超过了Ultra PC:Acer Swift 3 SF316-51。Acer Swift 3 SF316-51, Honor MagicBook 16 2022和LG gram 16。
开箱后,LG Display面板的色彩还原度不错,但未能达到目标值(Delta E低于3),色差约为4.6。该面板没有任何蓝色的色调。校准确实提高了色彩的准确性,但只是对灰度而言。Delta E从3.8下降到0.4。另一方面,色彩的Delta E变得更糟,从4.6增加到5.0。我们使用Portrait Displays的Calman色彩校准软件进行了所有的测量。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于采用了哑光处理,在户外也能看到显示屏。然而,平庸的峰值亮度对户外使用来说是适得其反的。以下照片是在最大屏幕亮度下拍摄的(Vari-Bright关闭)。
IPS面板具有宽广的视角,可以从任何位置轻松观看。
性能--为另一块SSD提供空间
我们的评测模型在LG的网站上找不到。该设备已经根据零售商的规格进行了配置,以便达到一个非常低的价格点--目前约为840至880欧元(840至880美元)。对于这个价格,你将得到一个四核的 AMD Ryzen 3 5300U处理器(八线程,时钟速度为2.60-3.80GHz),以及少量的内存(只有8GB)。其余的规格与酷睿i5型号相同,包括512GB固态硬盘。你应该仔细考虑Ryzen 3型号是否适合你,因为内存是焊接的,不可升级。
Ultra PC也可以选择八核的 Ryzen 7 5825U(2.0 GHz,提升速度可达4.5 GHz,16 MB的L3高速缓存)或六核 Ryzen 5 5625U(2.3 GHz,提升速度高达4.3 GHz,16 MB的L3高速缓存)。这两个变体默认配备16GB双通道内存,其价格从960欧元(960美元)起。
测试条件
与基于英特尔的克不同,Ultra PC没有配备LG控制中心。只有LG更新和恢复应用程序预装在系统中。这意味着你只有内置的Windows工具和Radeon软件供你使用,分别用于管理系统性能和GPU。我们将Radeon软件留在其默认设置中。因此,省电的FPS限制器没有被启用。我们还禁用了AMD Vari-Bright和所有Windows省电模式,并选择了 "最佳性能 "选项。在电池寿命测试中,电源计划被设置为 "平衡"。
处理器
淘宝网 AMD Ryzen 3 5300U使用Cinebench循环测试了带有八个线程的AMD Ryzen 3 5300U。Ultra PC的表现要好于 LG gram 16 (2021)但只是在多核测试中。所有其他配备Ryzen 5或7的笔记本电脑都远远领先于Ultra PC,性能好60%至100%。尽管如此,Ryzen 3 Ryzen 3有一个可敬的表现--在持续负载下,随着时间的推移,只有8%的小幅度性能下降。该处理器在最初几秒钟能够以26-27瓦的功率运行,然后迅速下降到20瓦(见第一个Cinebench运行的功率使用图)。在循环运行基准测试一段时间后,Ryzen 3稳定在大约18瓦,CPU温度上升到约90℃(194℉)。
在没有任何中断的持续负载下(如R15循环),Ryzen 3的反应是将其时钟速度降低到略高于3.0 GHz,导致APU的功耗保持在稳定的17瓦特。这个数字与该芯片能够达到的30瓦的PL2(短时爆发)和25瓦的PL1(持续)相差甚远。看来LG已经降低了极限,以降低机箱温度和尽量减少噪音。这对笔记本电脑的排放是很好的,我们稍后会看到,但(略)影响了我们能从CPU获得多少性能。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average of class Office | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (4772 - 5522, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (1102 - 1129, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (1883 - 2138, n=4) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (431 - 441, n=4) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (832 - 915, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (166 - 170, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (524 - 617, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (19170 - 24366, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=97, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (3755 - 4198, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (3730 - 4191, n=3) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=97, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (1040 - 1080, n=3) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (5.87 - 6.74, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (63.4 - 77.1, n=3) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=95, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (0.654 - 0.664, n=3) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G -1! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (3612 - 7053, n=3) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (33606 - 37829, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (1244 - 1248, n=2) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=96, last 2 years) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (51280 - 51454, n=3) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (6686 - 6703, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (17564 - 20109, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average of class Office (7860 - 155900, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (19307 - 34964, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (374 - 396, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (3199 - 3768, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (16799 - 17037, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
系统性能
根据PCMark 10,应用性能在所有子项得分中都相当乏力,甚至低于办公笔记本电脑中两年的平均水平。该CPU与 Ryzen 7 5700U相比,戴尔Inspiron的Ryzen 7 5700U的性能要好11%。在Crossmark这一替代基准中,5300U和5700U之间几乎没有任何区别(+4-7%)。这就是说,我们知道, 戴尔Inspiron 15 5515并没有完全发挥APU的潜力;这也是我们对该设备的批评之一。那些想在预算内获得出色性能的人应该看看配备Ryzen H系列APU的设备,例如 Honor MagicBook 16 2022配备 Ryzen 5 5600H.这将给你带来最大的实惠--即使是在CPU基准测试中。
我们不能对Ryzen 7变体的超极本电脑是否会有更好的性能做出任何广泛的声明。这真的取决于其冷却解决方案的容量和指定的功率限制。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4299 - 5006, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (7833 - 9015, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (6596 - 7852, n=3) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Office (2126 - 9773, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4136 - 4811, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (932 - 935, n=2) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (983 - 989, n=2) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (899 - 920, n=2) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (844 - 866, n=2) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
PCMark 10 Score | 4299 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (30710 - 36092, n=3) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (34493 - 35443, n=3) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=97, last 2 years) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (38052 - 40554, n=3) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (97.1 - 113.5, n=3) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=97, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
在我们的标准化延迟监测测试中(网页浏览、4K视频播放、Prime95高负荷),我们观察到笔记本电脑的DPC延迟的问题。即使最高的中断处理是相当温和的517毫秒,我们在播放4K YouTube视频时看到50个丢帧。Latency Mon怀疑这个问题可能与Wi-Fi驱动程序或BIOS中的CPU节流设置有关。然而,我们找不到任何负面指标,即使是在高级选项下(Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F7)。因此,以其目前的驱动程序配置,该系统似乎不适合实时视频和音频处理。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
三星SSD(PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU)的容量为512GB。还有一个更大的1TB选项用于Ryzen 7型号。由于笔记本电脑没有预装很多软件,开箱后大约有420GB的可用存储空间。PM991驱动器是市场上相当快的SSD之一。但它在超极本上的性能低于平均水平。这一点,加上少量的内存,可能是在PCMark 10和Crossmark中获得的平淡结果的原因。在持续负载下,三星固态硬盘的性能略有下降--但情况并不一定如此,正如PM9A1固态硬盘在 Honor 魔法书16.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
ǞǞǞ Radeon RX Vega 6仍然基于Ryzen 4000系列(Vega Renoir),使用7纳米工艺制造。它的工作频率为0.4-1.5GHz。在我们的测试中,该GPU能够超过RX Vega 8在 戴尔Inspiron 15 5515从而证实了戴尔并没有能够利用GPU的大部分功率。然而,这并不表明Ryzen 7 5700U的典型性能。 Ryzen 7 5700U与 Vega 8图形。的 Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs在相关的3DMark测试中取得了第一名(+50/70%)。
3DMark 06 1024x768 Score | 17429 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 4334 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15310 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2301 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 972 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
我们的游戏测试也证实了该GPU的糟糕性能:RX Vega 6交付的结果并不令人惊讶,表现比Vega 7略差,比Iris Xe G7 96EUs差得多。 Iris Xe G7 96EUs.你不可能在Ryzen 3的iGPU上做很多游戏。 Ryzen 3即使使用双通道内存。当分辨率和细节设置全部调低时,我们测试的所有游戏都只能以边缘可玩的帧率运行。对性能要求很高的新游戏在笔记本电脑上甚至无法播放。例如,由于内存不足,F1 2022在中等设置下不断崩溃。
The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (12 - 106.3, n=68, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (21.3 - 39, n=13) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
Average of class Office (12.1 - 103.1, n=93, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (15.6 - 32.2, n=9) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 | |
Average of class Office (13.4 - 77.2, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (17 - 30.3, n=6) |
F1 22 - 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Office (19.9 - 107.4, n=37, last 2 years) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (17.4 - 40.9, n=4) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 94 | 83 | 21 | 8 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 48.6 | 31.1 | 14.5 | 8.6 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 134.4 | 119.5 | 70.9 | 66.1 | 29 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 15.6 | ||||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 34.4 | 28.5 | 24.2 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 36 | 20 | 17 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 63.8 | 25.7 | 21.2 | 18.1 | |
F1 2021 (2021) | 67.9 | 28 | |||
F1 22 (2022) | 40.9 | 0 () |
排放--安静的Windows PC
噪声排放
虽然Ultra PC并不是完全无声的,但风扇在空闲时运行非常安静(25.4 dB(A)),我们只有把耳朵贴在笔记本上才能听到它。即使在我们的压力测试中,尽管风扇一直在快速旋转,但风扇的噪音并不令人讨厌,只有36 dB(A),而且最关键的是,保持在一个恒定的水平。我们的评测单元没有产生任何其他噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 25 / 25.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.2 / 36.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F Vega 8, R7 5700U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Vega 7, R5 5500U | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | 3% | -2% | -6% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 26 -4% | 26 -4% | 25.4 -2% | 26 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 26 -4% | 26 -4% | 25.4 -2% | 26 -4% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 26 -4% | 26 -4% | 25.4 -2% | 26 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.4 | 27.7 -9% | 26 -2% | 25.4 -0% | 26 -2% |
Load Average * | 36.2 | 32.7 10% | 30.8 15% | 34 6% | 42.6 -18% |
Load Maximum * | 36.4 | 39 -7% | 31.1 15% | 40 -10% | 37.4 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在不处理密集任务时,LG笔记本电脑的温度只比室温略高。在负载情况下,表面温度达到40-45℃(104-113℉)。最高的温度是在靠近显示器铰链的底盖中间测量的。考虑到风扇通过铰链附近的排气口将热空气推出设备,这并不令人惊讶。笔记本电脑不仅能够在压力和持续负载下保持相对凉爽,而且你可以一直在腿上使用它,没有问题或烧伤的风险。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.6 °C / -2.8 F).
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Honor MagicBook 16 2022 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -8% | -1% | -12% | 1% | 3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.5 | 40 -1% | 46.9 -19% | 39.4 -0% | 40.5 -3% | 41.6 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 47 -4% | 45.1 -0% | 45.4 -1% | 42 7% | 43.1 4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.7 | 30.1 -13% | 26.4 1% | 33.2 -24% | 26.5 1% | 25.4 5% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.2 | 31.6 -12% | 24.1 15% | 35.1 -24% | 29 -3% | 25.6 9% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
LG Ultra PC 16在压力测试中遇到了困难。CPU的时钟速度在短暂达到3.1GHz的峰值后稳定在2600MHz。GPU运行在一个适度的810兆赫,这与它的最大时钟速度1,500兆赫相差甚远。在这种性能节流的情况下,温度保持在恒定的86℃(187°F)。
相比之下,在Cinebench循环中,CPU的时钟速度要高得多,在稳定在3.2GHz之前短暂达到3.8GHz的峰值。在这两种情况下,CPU的总功率使用量激增到27瓦,然后稳定在17-18瓦。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | 2.6 | 400 | 45 | 41 |
Prime95压力 | 3.1 | 400 | 92 | 74 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.60 | 810 | 86 | 76 |
Cinebench R15循环 | 2.12 | 400 | 70 | 57 |
发言人
立体声扬声器听起来还不错,但缺乏低音。我们建议使用一副耳机或外部扬声器以获得更好的音频体验。内置的双阵列麦克风大多能够产生无噪音的音频记录。对着麦克风说话的人可以离笔记本电脑最远约2米(6.6英尺)。LG预装了完整版的CyberLink AudioDirector,可用于编辑和混合音乐或音频记录。
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG Gram 16 (2021) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--高效的笔记本电脑
消耗功率
Ultra PC的用电量相当低,但对于里面的硬件来说是典型的。在空闲状态下,我们测得的功耗不超过9瓦左右。减少一些设置甚至使空闲时的功耗下降到大约4瓦特。
压力测试(同时运行Prime95和FurMark至少一个小时)导致功耗增加到45瓦--但只是暂时的。下图显示了在压力测试期间,由于显著的CPU和GPU节流,功耗如何在很短的时间内下降到40瓦以下。系统最终稳定在40瓦左右。
该电源的额定功率为65瓦。另外,Ultra PC也可以使用USB-C充电器充电,即使是输出功率较低的充电器(如45瓦)。不过,如果你使用瓦数较低的充电器,系统会通知你,它可能不会以全性能运行。
Off / Standby | 0.15 / 1.55 Watt |
Idle | 3.7 / 6.8 / 8.6 Watt |
Load |
30 / 45 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1280x1200, 16" | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F R7 5700U, Vega 8, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Honor MagicBook 16 2022 R5 5600H, Vega 7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -15% | -16% | -6% | -19% | -40% | -7% | -23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 4.8 -30% | 3.8 -3% | 3.8 -3% | 3.7 -0% | 5.1 -38% | 3.98 ? -8% | 4.49 ? -21% |
Idle Average * | 6.8 | 7.4 -9% | 9 -32% | 6.6 3% | 7.9 -16% | 8.7 -28% | 6.53 ? 4% | 7.44 ? -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.6 | 9 -5% | 11.3 -31% | 8 7% | 9.3 -8% | 9.2 -7% | 8.65 ? -1% | 9.07 ? -5% |
Load Average * | 30 | 34.9 -16% | 35.2 -17% | 33.4 -11% | 41 -37% | 50.7 -69% | 35 ? -17% | 42.7 ? -42% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.2 | 34.9 -16% | 33.6 -11% | 41 -36% | 45.9 -52% | |||
Load Maximum * | 45 | 51.4 -14% | 43.5 3% | 54 -20% | 52.2 -16% | 66.5 -48% | 51.5 ? -14% | 61.7 ? -37% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power Consumption with External Monitor
电池寿命
由于其低功率使用和72Wh的大电池,Ultra PC拥有出色的耐力,可以毫不费力地跟上 LG gram 16在电池寿命方面。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,我们的评测设备比基于英特尔的克16多持续了整整85分钟,后者的电池容量为80Wh。我们谈论的是一个在屏幕亮度降低到150cd/m²(比最大亮度低4级)时可以实际运行17小时的设备。
Ultra PC的多核性能高于配备Core i7的gram。这反映在其负载下的电力使用上(即运行Battery Eater Classic):Ultra PC在141分钟内完全耗尽其电池,而gram则需要258分钟才能做到这一点。
在闲置状态下,Ultra PC甚至能够持续32小时(在最低亮度和启动飞行模式的情况下),令人印象深刻。诚然,这个数字对于日常使用可能并不那么重要,但没有一个竞争对手能在这方面击败这台笔记本电脑。
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6, 72 Wh | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5515-H8P8F R7 5700U, Vega 8, 54 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7, 70 Wh | Honor MagicBook 16 2022 R5 5600H, Vega 7, 56 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 21% | -36% | -19% | -12% | -56% | -30% | |
Reader / Idle | 1937 | 1713 -12% | 1205 -38% | 1300 ? -33% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 1026 | 943 -8% | 585 -43% | 627 -39% | 839 -18% | 491 -52% | 612 ? -40% |
Load | 141 | 258 83% | 103 -27% | 144 2% | 134 -5% | 57 -60% | 117.8 ? -16% |
H.264 | 1204 | 615 | 645 | 925 | 484 | 728 ? | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 130 | 110 | 142 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 比克的耐力更强
LG Ultra PC 16是那些买不起或不愿意支付真正的LG gram的人的替代品吗?
不,与格子机不同,Ultra PC的设计并不是为了尽可能地轻巧。这款16英寸的笔记本电脑比其16英寸的克重整整重了400克(0.88磅),部分原因是其底盘不是由镁制成的。除此以外,Ultra PC似乎是gram的复制品--但电池寿命更长,噪音更低,外观也更简洁、精致。
Ultra PC没有两个带Power Delivery的Thunderbolt 4端口,而只有一个USB-C端口(同样带Power Delivery)。LG包括一个65瓦的充电器,带有一个小小的桶状插头,这样你就可以在不占用USB-C端口的情况下插入笔记本电脑。
那些希望以实惠的价格获得超长电池寿命的人绝对应该考虑LG Ultra PC 16。这是因为它的竞争对手没有一个能在现实中持续接近Ultra PC所能达到的17小时。
但并不是所有闪闪发光的东西都是金子。8GB的内存是不可扩展的,你真的需要仔细考虑这对你来说是否足够。尽管严重的背光渗漏只有在屏幕变黑和你在黑暗的地方时才会被注意到,但每次移动边框都会变得更糟。此外,键盘表现出弯曲,感觉很脆弱,我们不会向经常打字的人推荐。
8GB的焊接内存,没有任何扩展选项--这是需要记住的事情。我们建议购买价格略高的16GB型号。
Ultra PC在这里不是为了取代克拉克,但(就价格而言)是其他轻薄型全能商务笔记本电脑的替代品,如 Acer Swift 3 SF316-51和 联想IdeaPad 5 15ALC05.该 Swift 3特别是,以其卓越的显示屏、更好的键盘和Thunderbolt端口脱颖而出。
同样的,基于AMD的 IdeaPad 5 15ALC05在谈到性价比的时候,是一个重要的选择。虽然这款15.6英寸的笔记本电脑并不完全出众,但它能够充分利用Ryzen 5的潜力,并提供令人印象深刻的14小时的电池寿命(在我们150cd/m²的Wi-Fi测试中)。
价格和可用性
我们的审查模型,配备了一个 Ryzen 38GB内存和512GB固态硬盘,可从Cyberport839欧元(839美元)的价格(仅在德国)。在美国,你可以直接从LG获得配备Ryzen 7、16GB内存和1TB存储空间的机型,价格为1100美元。以1,100美元的价格。
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
- 10/20/2022 v7 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch