惠普Pavilion Plus 14笔记本电脑回顾。OLED、90赫兹和12代酷睿H
惠普Pavilion Plus 14是 "专业 "机型,与标准 14一样。 标准Pavilion 14.它带有更高端的选项,如酷睿H系列CPU和OLED显示屏,以对比标准Pavilion 14的典型酷睿U系列和IPS选项。
我们的测试机配备了酷睿i7-12700H处理器,集成了Iris Xe显卡,以及90 Hz 16:10 1800p OLED显示屏,零售价约为850美元。如下表所示,其他SKU也是可用的。Pavilion Plus 14与其他中档或更高的14英寸超极本竞争,如 华硕VivoBook Pro 14, 联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro,或 微星现代14系列。
酷睿i5-1240P | 酷睿i5-1240P | 酷睿i7-12700H | 酷睿i7-1255U |
虹膜Xe | Iris Xe | 虹膜Xe | GeForce RTX 2050 |
14英寸IPS 2.2k300-nit | 14英寸IPS 2.2k300-nit | 14英寸OLED 2.8k400-nit | 14英寸OLED 2.8k400-nit |
8GB内存 | 8GB内存 | 16GB内存 | 16GB内存 |
256 GB SSD | 512 GB 固态硬盘 | 256 GB 固态硬盘 | 512 GB固态硬盘 |
更多惠普评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
83.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.86 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
82.2 % v7 (old) | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
84.8 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - Pavilion Pro
Pavilion Plus 14保留了原来Pavilion 14的铝制外观和感觉,尽管所有的内部变化可能是为了节省成本。如果惠普引入任何重大的设计改进,那么这款Pavilion Plus机型基本上就是惠普的Envy产品,而Envy是惠普成本较高的系列。然而,这并不是说没有表面上的变化,因为Pavilion Plus 14的边缘明显更平坦,而且采用了不同的底板设计,使整体厚度减少了约0.7毫米。
底座周围的底盘刚性很好,弯曲度很小。然而,机盖和内部塑料边框明显更容易受到扭曲和损坏,特别是因为没有大猩猩玻璃选项来加固面板。尽管如此,建造质量仍可与竞争者Vivobook或IdeaPad系列相媲美。
由于采用了新的16:10长宽比,尺寸上比标准的Pavilion 14要短,但长度要长。总重量保持不变,约为1.4公斤。
连接性 - 不支持Thunderbolt
端口选项大多与标准的Pavilion 14相同,但有一个重大变化。惠普已经放弃了专有的交流适配器桶状端口,换成了第二个USB-C端口。我们预计,在不久的将来,如果不是所有的非游戏机Pavilion ,大多数机型也会转为USB-C充电。
端口的位置可能对一些用户不利,因为大多数端口都在右边的边缘,可能会占用宝贵的桌面空间。
不幸的是,不支持Thunderbolt,因为这种功能目前仍保留给Envy或Spectre等高端机型。
SD卡阅读器
考虑到Pavilion 的价格范围,集成的弹簧式MicroSD读卡器提供了~80MB/s的体面传输率。像Spectre x360 14这样价格较高的替代品可以以超过3倍的速度将文件从卡上移到桌面。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
通讯 - 无Wi-Fi 6E
该设备配备了一个经济的Realtek RTL8852AE模块,用于Wi-Fi 6和蓝牙5连接。传输速率虽然稳定,可用于流媒体和大多数情况,但比更常见的英特尔AX200/201系列慢得多。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr |
网络摄像头 - 5百万像素摄像头
该机型采用了500万像素的网络摄像头,与标准Pavilion 14上的100万像素网络摄像头不同,可以获得更清晰的图像。然而,没有隐私快门或用于支持Windows Hello的红外传感器。
维护
只需一把飞利浦螺丝刀和锋利的边缘,底板就可以比较容易地拆下来。值得庆幸的是,在任何橡胶脚下都没有隐藏的螺丝,不像老一代的Pavilion 。事实上,惠普甚至有一个方便的视频为想要维修笔记本电脑的用户提供了一个方便的视频。
一旦进入,用户可以根据需要换掉WLAN、电池或M.2模块。内存是焊接的,用户不能升级。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,盒子里没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买,则适用标准的一年有限制造商保修。
输入设备
键盘
键盘和点击板都与普通的Pavilion 14相同,这几乎不是什么抱怨,因为我们喜欢Pavilion 14上的键盘。与华硕Vivobook或联想IdeaPad的键盘相比,这款Pavilion 的键盘出乎意料地清脆,按压时有令人满意的行程。我们的主要抱怨仍然是白色背光,与白色键帽的对比度很差。我们怀疑在其他四种颜色的选择中,这不会是一个问题。
触摸板
点击板很大,为12.5 x 8厘米,而竞争者的点击板已经很大,为12 x 7.5厘米。 瑜伽瘦身7i Pro.光标控制感觉很宽敞,而且由于显示器的90赫兹刷新率,也非常流畅。同时,点击的反馈是令人满意的,尽管略微有点海绵状,而且有点偏大。不过,这是我们在Pavilion 级笔记本电脑上使用过的比较舒适的点击板之一。
显示屏 - 90 Hz, OLED, 1800p, 100% DCI-P3
Pavilion Plus 14使用与Vivobook Pro 14相同或类似的1800p三星OLED面板。因此,这两台笔记本电脑的观看体验几乎是相同的。然而,我们可以说,华硕笔记本电脑包括更多惠普没有的OLED护理功能,如蓝光设置、减少闪烁的滑块、减少烧蚀,以及更容易的色彩空间变化,这些都是发烧友可以欣赏的。除此之外,在经历了90赫兹的OLED之后,再回到60赫兹的IPS是很困难的。
值得注意的是,OLED面板在所有亮度设置(包括最大亮度)下都表现出357赫兹的闪烁。这似乎是原生刷新率高于60赫兹的较新OLED面板的一个共同特征。如果你的眼睛对闪烁敏感,那么最好避免长期使用这种OLED笔记本电脑。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 388.3 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr Samsung SDC4170, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T SAMSUNG: SDC4171, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 BOE NV14N42, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 LEN140WQ+, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 BOE CQ NV140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng LGD0619, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -55% | -14% | -53% | -27% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.41 0% | 38.6 -61% | 77.7 -22% | 39.9 -60% | 62 -38% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.94 0% | 56.2 -44% | 100 0% | 58.8 -41% | 92 -8% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.9 | 94.79 -4% | 39.9 -60% | 78.4 -21% | 41.2 -58% | 63 -36% |
Response Times | -88% | -1777% | -1995% | -1033% | -2049% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.2 ? | 3 ? -150% | 27.2 ? -2167% | 35.2 ? -2833% | 25 ? -1983% | 37 ? -2983% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.4 ? | 3 ? -114% | 20.8 ? -1386% | 17.6 ? -1157% | 16 ? -1043% | 17 ? -1114% |
PWM Frequency | 357 ? | 360 1% | 92 ? -74% | |||
Screen | 20% | -108% | -17% | -40% | -58% | |
Brightness middle | 388.3 | 384 -1% | 269.4 -31% | 469 21% | 347 -11% | 387 0% |
Brightness | 391 | 385 -2% | 260 -34% | 445 14% | 311 -20% | 359 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 89 -9% | 90 -8% | 81 -17% | 84 -14% |
Black Level * | 0.07 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 0.55 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.51 | 1.75 61% | 6.53 -45% | 3.5 22% | 5.05 -12% | 4.04 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.06 | 3.41 52% | 19.76 -180% | 5.3 25% | 16.98 -141% | 8.28 -17% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.06 12% | 5.4 -350% | 3.3 -175% | 1.63 -36% | 5 -317% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.39 92% | 2.05 107% | 1.97 112% | 2.3 96% | 2.62 84% |
CCT | 6290 103% | 6440 101% | 6007 108% | 6512 100% | 6666 98% | 7123 91% |
Contrast | 5486 | 657 | 2892 | 704 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.32 | 3.13 | 1.7 | 1 | ||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -23% /
-12% | -647% /
-397% | -675% /
-376% | -375% /
-291% | -711% /
-411% |
* ... smaller is better
我们能够记录到100%的P3色彩覆盖率,以支持惠普关于全DCI-P3色彩的说法。在这个价格范围内的大多数IPS显示器只承诺全sRGB覆盖率,相比之下,如 瑜伽瘦身7i Pro 14.然而,Pavilion 上的OLED面板没有在工厂进行校准,这可能是为了节省成本。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 357 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 357 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 357 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
与相同亮度设置下的IPS相比,OLED的高黑度使其在户外观看时更加舒适。尽管如此,在大多数户外条件下,我们的光面OLED面板上仍然可以看到眩光。否则最大亮度高于平均水平,Pavilion ,可与华硕Vivobook Pro 14或Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14相媲美。
性能 - 与戴尔XPS 17 9720的CPU相同
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过Windows和惠普命令中心软件将我们的设备设置为性能模式。我们建议用户熟悉惠普命令中心,因为性能和网络设置都是在这里切换的。
处理器
原始多线程性能比预期中的酷睿i7-12700H慢了大约20%。 酷睿i7-12700H笔记本电脑的速度要慢20%。笔记本 戴尔XPS 17 9720例如,戴尔XPS 17 9720配备了相同的酷睿i7-12700H CPU,但它的多线程性能要快40%到45%,即使考虑到任何节流因素。这种差距足够大,甚至更省电的酷睿i5-1240P也只比搭载H系列酷睿i7的惠普慢10%到15%。对于这个尺寸来说,这是一台快速的笔记本电脑,但考虑到我们在其他采用相同处理器的笔记本电脑上观察到的情况,它肯定会更快。
用户可以配置较慢的酷睿i5-1240P或 酷睿i7-1255U如果需要的话。特别是后者是唯一一个有独立的GeForce RTX 2050选项的SKU,尽管与我们的Core i7-12700H相比,其代价是多线程性能慢了40%。Nvidia选项在Core-P或Core-H配置上不可用,可能是由于散热限制。
循环运行CineBench R15 xT显示,如下图所示,初始运行后性能下降了约10%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=63) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=63) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19330, n=63) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1826, n=62) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=69) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=64) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (168 - 732, n=62) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=62) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=62) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=63) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=63) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=63) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=62) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UM5401QA-KN162 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=62) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=62) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=62) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
系统性能
PCMark的结果是我们所期望的,相对于其他配备相同Core i7-12700H CPU的笔记本电脑,如果不是稍稍慢一点的话。特别是CrossMark结果比平均水平慢,可能是由于上面记录的CineBench结果慢。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5541 - 6281, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10569 - 11699, n=7) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6690 - 8038, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6207 - 7401, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1492 - 1907, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1499 - 1832, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1507 - 2016, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1384 - 1831, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
PCMark 10 Score | 5893 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=60) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时存在DPC问题。4K视频播放在其他方面很完美,资源利用率很低,这是现代酷睿H系列处理器所期望的。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 只有一个驱动器
我们的设备配备了中档的256GB SK Hynix BC711PCIe3 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,提供约3400 MB/s的优秀连续读取率,但连续写入率慢得多,只有约1000 MB/s。更高端的PCIe3驱动器,如三星PM981a系列,可以提供超过2倍的写入率。
在我们的测试装置中,当受到DiskSpd的循环测试时,该硬盘没有表现出节流现象。然而,性能有时会下降到2550 MB/s的范围,然后再跳回3400 MB/s,可能是由于一些中断的背景活动。我们确保事先卸载任何自动备份和McAfee进程,但小幅度的下降仍会继续。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng -8! |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - Iris Xe
图形性能比预期的稍微慢一些。我们的惠普返回的帧率与具有相同功能的普通笔记本电脑相比,低了几个百分点。 Iris Xe 96 EUsGPU。它仍然足以在低设置下玩大多数游戏,但它现在已经被最近的 Radeon 680M.
升级到 GeForce RTX 2050选项预计将比我们的Iris Xe增加大约150%至180%的图形性能。
奇怪的是,3DMark的结果在平衡和性能模式之间不一致,甚至在反复运行后也是如此。然而,当运行实际的游戏时,我们可以看到时钟速率和功耗的差异,如我们下面的压力测试部分所示。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7081 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20292 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4044 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1630 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 97.5 | 78.7 | 14.9 | 6.65 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 86.7 | 54.1 | 27.1 | 13.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 109.7 | 80.9 | 54.6 | 50.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.7 | 20 | 14.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 45.5 | 43.4 | 38.5 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 85.9 | 36.2 | 30.2 | 24.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 20.5 | 16.8 | 12.4 |
排放
系统噪音 - 大声的游戏者,安静的工作者
尽管在通常为酷睿U系列选项保留的机箱尺寸中使用了酷睿H系列CPU,但风扇噪音并不是一个问题。例如,在浏览网页或视频流时,风扇会在27至28分贝(A)的范围内徘徊,而静音背景为23.3分贝(A),在大多数情况下几乎听不到。
当运行更高的负载(如游戏)时,风扇噪音会大大增加,风扇噪音可能在34至45 dB(A)之间。即便如此,这个范围也更接近许多酷睿U系列超极本,而且仍然比微星现代14.5英寸笔记本更安静。 微星现代14或华硕Vivobook Pro 14的更快的独立GPU。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 23.5 / 23.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32 / 44.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A) |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3GX013N | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -26% | -4% | -5% | -20% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 23.3 | 25.4 -9% | 23.1 1% | 23.7 -2% | 26 -12% | 25.4 -9% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 25.4 -8% | 24.7 -5% | 23.7 -1% | 26 -11% | 25.4 -8% |
Idle Average * | 23.5 | 25.4 -8% | 24.7 -5% | 25.1 -7% | 26 -11% | 25.4 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.5 | 30.9 -31% | 24.7 -5% | 25.1 -7% | 26 -11% | 25.4 -8% |
Load Average * | 32 | 56 -75% | 27.7 13% | 38.4 -20% | 46.3 -45% | 35.4 -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.3 | 45.1 -28% | 38.4 -9% | 46.3 -31% | ||
Load Maximum * | 44.3 | 56 -26% | 45.1 -2% | 39.4 11% | 52.9 -19% | 35.5 20% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于冷却液在内部的位置,系统的右半部分总是比左半部分更热。这种温度行为是不利的,因为它意味着右手有时会感到不舒服的温暖。一个更对称的温度梯度,例如在 HP Spectre x360 14一般来说更舒适。
在运行游戏等高要求的负载时,顶部和底部的热点可以分别达到39℃和36℃。不过,这比我们在 华硕Vivobook Pro 14 或联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14上观察到的情况要冷一些,后者的热点在顶部可以达到43℃,在底部可以达到53℃。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.5 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -32% | -11% | -19% | -40% | -15% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.4 | 42.3 -7% | 38.2 3% | 42.3 -7% | 55.6 -41% | 40.5 -3% |
Maximum Bottom * | 33.8 | 49.6 -47% | 45.6 -35% | 52.8 -56% | 67.8 -101% | 39.9 -18% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 34.2 -37% | 27.4 -10% | 27.1 -8% | 28.3 -13% | 31.3 -25% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.6 | 37.9 -37% | 28.4 -3% | 29.1 -5% | 28.9 -5% | 31.1 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,在最初的几秒钟里,时钟频率和封装功耗将分别提升到3.5GHz和60W,直到达到95C的核心温度。 戴尔Inspiron 7420.在我们的惠普中,要求更高的Core i7-12700H CPU的温度后果是明显的。
当运行 Witcher 3在性能模式下,代表压力负荷,GPU时钟速率和温度将分别稳定在1397 MHz和84 C,而在平衡模式下运行时只有1197 MHz和80 C。这些核心温度又比我们对一台没有独立显卡的14英寸笔记本电脑的预期要高。
用电池供电运行限制了性能。在电池上运行3DMark 11,物理和图形分数分别为12896和5591分,而在主电源上则为1607和6649分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 46 |
Prime95压力 | 2.2 - 2.9 | - | 89 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.2 - 2.3 | 948 | 88 |
Witcher 3 应力(平衡模式) | ~0.5 | 1197 | 80 |
Witcher 3 应力(性能模式) | ~0.7 | 1397 | 84 |
发言人
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--有需求的系统
消耗功率
耗电量通常高于其他运行酷睿U系列CPU的14英寸笔记本电脑。标准的 酷睿i5-1135G7Pavilion 14例如,在运行Prime95时,其功耗要高69%,这与上面记录的65%至70%的多线程性能相关。由于OLED比IPS更耗电,所以在桌面上闲置时,耗电量也可能更高。 比IPS更耗电显示白色时更耗电。例如,在最大亮度设置下,在一个以黑色为主的屏幕上空转,将只消耗6瓦,而在最大亮度下的全白屏幕将消耗超过19瓦。预设的桌面背景大部分是黑色的,这可能不是巧合,因为惠普知道它比色彩鲜艳的替代品更省电。
在运行Prime95时,我们能够从中等大小(约13 x 6.5 x 2.9厘米)的90瓦交流适配器中记录到最大的耗电量。这个最大值不会随着时间的推移而下降很多,因此,如果运行如此苛刻的负载,用户可以预期充电速度会减慢。
Off / Standby | 0.23 / 0.56 Watt |
Idle | 5.6 / 6.1 / 19.4 Watt |
Load |
62.7 / 90 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3GX013N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -22% | 17% | 10% | 5% | 20% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.6 | 6.6 -18% | 5.2 7% | 5.6 -0% | 3 46% | 4.8 14% |
Idle Average * | 6.1 | 9.6 -57% | 8.2 -34% | 9.3 -52% | 6.3 -3% | 8.5 -39% |
Idle Maximum * | 19.4 | 7.3 62% | 9.9 49% | 9.6 51% | 10.3 47% | 12.4 36% |
Load Average * | 62.7 | 73 -16% | 44.4 29% | 49 22% | 66 -5% | 37.7 40% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.8 | 74.4 -70% | 35 20% | 38.2 13% | 66.6 -52% | 35.4 19% |
Load Maximum * | 90 | 119 -32% | 62.5 31% | 65.2 28% | 90.6 -1% | 45.3 50% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
运行时间充其量是平均水平,可能是由于使用了OLED和酷睿H系列CPU,而不是更高效的U或P系列。大多数网页都是以白色为主,这对电池的要求更高,这一点也没有帮助。当我们在平衡电源配置文件上浏览网页时,我们只能记录到4.5小时的电池寿命,而在微星Modern 14上几乎是它的两倍。微星现代14或联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro。
用附带的适配器从空电到满电需要2至2.5小时。
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 51 Wh | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 54 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 61 Wh | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 52.4 Wh | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 43 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 57% | 66% | 29% | 91% | 31% | |
Reader / Idle | 506 | 687 36% | 954 89% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 274 | 569 108% | 455 66% | 517 89% | 523 91% | 360 31% |
Load | 89 | 112 26% | 127 43% | 61 -31% | ||
H.264 | 643 | 356 | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 121 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 幽灵的性能,但没有幽灵的价格
Pavilion Plus 14是你能找到的最便宜的笔记本电脑之一,配备12代酷睿i7 H系列CPU和90赫兹OLED显示屏。快速的CPU和OLED面板意味着Pavilion 系统即使在五年后也会有更长的寿命。我们很欣赏服务的便利性和舒适的键盘,特别是在像Pavilion 这样的预算系列。
一个平衡的、负担得起的系统,拥有最新的英特尔第12代CPU和90赫兹的OLED显示屏。
有一些需要注意的边角料。首先,由于高要求的CPU和OLED面板,电池寿命受到了影响。其次,GeForce RTX 2050选项只适用于Core-U SKU,这意味着任何Core-H配置都只能使用集成图形。相比之下,华硕 VivoBook Pro 14同时提供Ryzen H系列和GeForce RTX选项,以及OLED显示屏。最后,CPU性能,虽然考虑到外形因素仍然很好,但比其他大多数具有相同Core i7-12700H的笔记本电脑要慢。这是对小尺寸的权衡,性能猎手可能不喜欢听。然而,当考虑到价格时,Pavilion Plus 14在经济性、性能、功能和尺寸之间的平衡比预期的要好得多。
价格和可用性
Pavilion Plus 14现已在Staples出售。, 沃尔玛和惠普官方商店从709美元到1229美元的各种配置。
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr
- 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo