联想LOQ 15评测:配备 RTX 4060 的全高清游戏笔记本电脑,售价约 1,000 美元
![](fileadmin/_processed_/1/5/csm_4zu3_Lenovo_LOQ_15IRX9_35468c6102.jpg)
在联想的产品目录中,LOQ 系列包括经济型游戏笔记本电脑。本测试设备也完全符合这一类别:制造商要求的价格为 1000 多美元(不含 Windows)或 1300 美元(含 Windows 11),配置包括酷睿 i5 处理器、GeForce RTX 4060、16 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD。这款笔记本电脑的价格标签让它付出了代价:它采用塑料外壳,电池容量相对较小,没有雷电 4 或 USB 4 接口。竞争对手包括 技嘉 G6X 9KG (2024), 戴尔 G16, XMG Core 15 (M24)或 HP Victus 16 (2024).
联想LOQ 15IRX9的机箱与我们已经测试过的姊妹机型(Ryzen 7/RTX 4050,Core i7/RTX 4050 )并不完全相同。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.7 % | v8 | 06/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 15.30" | 2560x1600 | |
83.2 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 25.1 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
84.3 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | HP Victus 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
85.5 % | v7 (old) | 02/2024 | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.65 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 此处.
外壳和连接性 - 不带 USB 4 但带 Power Delivery 的 LOQ
笔记本电脑的硬件安装在一个哑光灰色(月光灰)塑料外壳内,总体看起来非常时尚。盖子和底座可以轻微扭动,但还可以接受。它的稳定性还不错。盖子的最大开启角度可达 180 度。该机型上看不到游戏笔记本电脑常见的 LED 灯带。
三个 USB-A 端口(USB 3.2 Gen 1)和一个 USB-C 端口(USB 3.2 Gen 2)足以满足大多数用户的需求。后者支持 Power Delivery 和显示 ALT 模式。这款笔记本电脑总共有两个视频输出接口(1x HDMI、1x DP)。其网络摄像头(210 万像素,带开关)效果一般。联想认为 SD 卡读卡器没有必要。
我们测得的 WiFi 数据传输速率很稳定,但仍落后于当今的水平。联想笔记本电脑的 Realtek WiFi 6 芯片(RTL8852BE)无法达到与许多竞争对手的英特尔芯片相同的速度。
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/5/c/csm_cam-1_dc2710424a.jpg)
可持续性
笔记本电脑和电源各用一个塑料袋包装,而 LOQ 在运输过程中则用泡沫塑料插件保护。所使用的塑料类型由制造商命名。一个纸套可以保护电源免受刮伤。所有这些都装在一个纸箱里--根据标签,所用木材来自可持续林业。
维修设备应该很容易:底板可以顺利拆下,这样就可以接触到所有硬件。我们在机箱内没有发现任何胶合部件。由于使用的是 Windows 11 操作系统,因此软件更新在未来几年都会得到保证。联想的支持将于 2029 年 12 月 31 日结束。
输入设备 - 联想笔记本电脑配备大型方向键
显示屏 - 板载 IPS
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 306 cd/m²
Contrast: 1457:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.45
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.259
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 BOE NJ NE156FHM-NX9, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 (BOE0C8E), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3" | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) BOE NE160WUM-NX6, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP Victus 16 (2024) Chi Mei CMN163E, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Chi Mei CMN161D (160GME), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -40% | -41% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 73.7 | 73.2 -1% | 41.8 -43% | 41.3 -44% | 67.5 -8% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.1 | 100 1% | 62.4 -37% | 61.7 -38% | 98.5 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.6 | 74.6 3% | 43.3 -40% | 42.7 -41% | 69.3 -5% |
Response Times | 68% | 4% | 25% | 68% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42.2 ? | 9.6 ? 77% | 40.5 ? 4% | 28.6 ? 32% | 7.6 ? 82% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22.6 ? | 9.2 ? 59% | 21.6 ? 4% | 18.7 ? 17% | 10.4 ? 54% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 6% | -68% | -78% | -15% | |
Brightness middle | 306 | 635 108% | 353 15% | 287 -6% | 369 21% |
Brightness | 287 | 604 110% | 318 11% | 288 0% | 344 20% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 91 3% | 81 -8% | 86 -2% | 89 1% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.64 -205% | 0.21 -0% | 0.19 10% | 0.26 -24% |
Contrast | 1457 | 992 -32% | 1681 15% | 1511 4% | 1419 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.25 | 1.89 16% | 5.21 -132% | 5.46 -143% | 3.04 -35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.84 | 3.14 35% | 19.95 -312% | 20.36 -321% | 5.56 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.45 | 1.14 21% | 3.61 -149% | 3.52 -143% | 2.35 -62% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.53 -5% | 3.6 -50% | 4.8 -100% | 3.38 -41% |
Gamma | 2.259 97% | 2.36 93% | 2.367 93% | 2.108 104% | 2.47 89% |
CCT | 6790 96% | 6434 101% | 7138 91% | 6442 101% | 6040 108% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 25% /
14% | -35% /
-52% | -31% /
-55% | 16% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱即用,显示屏校准良好:偏差约为 2.25,达到了目标值(DeltaE < 3)。对屏幕进行校准后,偏差降至 1.45,确保了灰阶色调更加均衡。该面板几乎可以完整地显示 sRGB 空间,但无法显示 AdobeRGB 和 DCI P3 空间。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise | |
↘ 11.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.1 ms rise | |
↘ 23.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace 为笔记本电脑提供动力
LOQ 机型是入门级游戏笔记本电脑。联想提供各种不同的配置--既有 AMD APU,也有英特尔 CPU。Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace(酷睿 i5-13450HX 和GeForce RTX 4060)为本测试设备提供了动力。它的售价约为 1,300 美元(含 Windows 11)或略高于 1,000 美元(不含 Windows)。
测试条件
笔记本电脑提供三种制造商特定的性能模式(见表),可通过组合键 "Fn "+"Q "进行切换。我们使用了平衡模式(基准测试)和安静模式(电池测试)。
第四种模式(自定义)可通过联想 Vantage(笔记本电脑的控制中心)选择。这样就可以单独设置处理器(功率限制)或图形处理器(TGP、动态提升、温度限制)的性能设置和风扇速度。还可以独立于配置文件对 GPU 和显存进行超频。
性能模式 | 平衡模式 | 静音模式 | |
---|---|---|---|
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 90 瓦 | 60 瓦 | 55 瓦 |
功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 162 瓦 | 119 瓦 | 65 瓦 |
噪音 (CP 2077 Phantom Liberty) | 54 dB(A) | 48 dB(A) | 39 dB(A) |
性能(CP 2077 Phantom Liberty) | 70 fps | 66 fps | 52 fps |
处理器
酷睿 i5-13450HX 酷睿 i5-13450HXRaptor Lake)的 10 个 CPU 内核(6P + 4E = 16 个线程)的最高时钟频率分别为 4.6 GHz(P)和 3.4 GHz(E)。连续多线程负载(CB15 Loop)导致其时钟频率从第一次运行到第四次运行(平衡模式)一直下降。之后,它保持稳定。性能模式则将时钟频率保持在较高水平。
基准测试结果正如我们所料(平衡模式),性能模式带来了(非常小的)优势。在比较范围内,酷睿 i5 的表现最差,因为它的计算核心数量最少。对于预算有限的游戏玩家来说,这款 CPU 是一个合适的选择。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (16575 - 17234, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Single Core | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (1710 - 1766, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (6489 - 6595, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 855, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (652 - 680, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=211, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (2427 - 2505, n=3) | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=208, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (239 - 251, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (196 - 229, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=200, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (59026 - 62204, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (5370 - 5576, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
Geekbench 6.2 | |
Multi-Core | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=105, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (6.2.1) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1, Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (12619 - 12799, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1) | |
Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=105, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1, Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (2381 - 2448, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=206, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (11973 - 12022, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=206, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (1696 - 1763, n=3) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=204, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (16.9 - 20.5, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (49.5 - 96.6, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.3.4.2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.3.4.2) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.3.4.2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.3.4.2, Leistungsmodus) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (6.3.4.2) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.3.4.2) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (0.4582 - 0.4838, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600, Leistungsmodus) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (13747 - 17767, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600, Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (71834 - 83862, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600, Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (3519 - 3530, n=3) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (41257 - 200651, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (85888 - 86148, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600, Leistungsmodus) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (3925 - 32988, n=201, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600, Leistungsmodus) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (9325 - 9354, n=3) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600, Leistungsmodus) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (34956 - 42825, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=201, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (70296 - 70680, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600, Leistungsmodus) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (269 - 2409, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (977 - 1002, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600, Leistungsmodus) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600, Leistungsmodus) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (7428 - 9561, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600, Leistungsmodus) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (36014 - 36764, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (5442 - 9852, n=180, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Gaming (8829 - 12334, n=179, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=162, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=162, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (Chrome 82) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (Chrome 82) | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=181, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Chrome 82) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (Chrome 82) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Chrome 82) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (Chrome 105.0.0.0) | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (Chrome 105.0.0.0) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Chrome 105.0.0.0) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Chrome 105.0.0.0) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Chrome 82) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Chrome 82) | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 737, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (Chrome 82) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (Chrome 82) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (Chrome 82) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6929 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (58673 - 58861, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (66626 - 69024, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=201, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (58540 - 60196, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13450HX (90 - 94.2, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
......(英文 GeForce RTX 4060(3,072 个着色器、128 位总线、8 GB GDDR6、115 瓦)代表了 Nvidia 当前移动 GPU 阵容中的中端产品。它可以在高至最高设置下进行全高清游戏。其基准测试结果和帧率与 RTX-4060 的平均值(平衡模式)大致相当。性能模式的数值有所提高。在 dGPU 和 Optimus 之间切换无需重启:支持高级 Optimus。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=200, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (28136 - 38912, n=51) |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=210, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (20533 - 29656, n=48) | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=206, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7484 - 11451, n=50) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 30755 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22788 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10214 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2143 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (3.3.3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (3.3.3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (19 - 28, n=47) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (3.3.3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (3.3.3, Leistungsmodus) | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (3.3.3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (3.3.3) | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (3.3.3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (3.3.3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (39 - 53, n=47) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (3.3.3, Leistungsmodus) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (3.3.3) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (3.3.3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (3.3.3) | |
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=194, last 2 years) | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (3.3.3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (3.3.3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (3.3.3, Leistungsmodus) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (3.3.3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (189 - 452, n=47) | |
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=204, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (3.3.3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (3.3.3) |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
OpenCL Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=206, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (5039 - 112238, n=47) | |
Vulkan Score 5.5 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (46347 - 87612, n=28) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) |
Geekbench 6.2 | |
GPU OpenCL | |
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=104, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (6.2.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1, Leistungsmodus) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (4321 - 100831, n=34) | |
GPU Vulkan 6.2 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (6.2.1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1, Leistungsmodus) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (4286 - 196201, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (4286 - 101001, n=33) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) |
V-Ray 5 Benchmark | |
GPU RTX | |
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=116, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (5.0.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (5.0.1, Leistungsmodus) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (5.0.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1387 - 1817, n=28) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (5.0.1) | |
GPU CUDA | |
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (5.0.1, Leistungsmodus) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (5.0.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (957 - 1294, n=29) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (5.0.1) | |
CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=128, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8364 - 21065, n=28) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (5.0.1, Leistungsmodus) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (5.0.1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (5.0.1) |
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | |
GPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v4.10.07, Leistungsmodus) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (483 - 715, n=40) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v4.10.07 ) | |
CPU | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (12680 - 32360, n=40) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v4.10.07, Leistungsmodus) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v4.10.07 ) |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (2.12) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (2.02, Leistungsmodus) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (56.7 - 93.1, n=25) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (2.02) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (2.11) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (2.02) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (2.02) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=185, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (76.9 - 124.9, n=42) |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (1.3, Leistungsmodus) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (1.3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (1.3) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (1.3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (1.3) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (1.3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (75.1 - 109.8, n=45) |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=196, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Leistungsmodus) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (135.3 - 210, n=46) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (115 - 183.8, n=47) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=211, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (66.5 - 141.1, n=48) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (Leistungsmodus) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
Dragon's Dogma 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (49.5 - 80, n=8, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (57.2 - 67.7, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 |
F1 24 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (54.1 - 127, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (54.1 - 60.9, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (1122588) |
Counter-Strike 2 - 1920x1080 Very High Preset | |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (123.9 - 139.1, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (11.5 - 189.7, n=10, last 2 years) |
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (38.4 - 78.8, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (37.6 - 39.5, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 |
Ghost of Tsushima - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (55.6 - 63.4, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (28.5 - 73.7, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 184.4 | 181.5 | 175.5 | 112.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 171.2 | 156.8 | 149.4 | 141 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 198.9 | 138.5 | 99.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 139.6 | 118.4 | 92.2 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 425 | 260 | 209 | 182.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 118.9 | 94.3 | 80.1 | 71.4 |
Counter-Strike 2 (2023) | 195.3 | 195 | 157 | 123.9 |
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 70.6 | 63.3 | ||
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 91 | 81.7 | 74.5 | 60.6 |
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 64.1 | 53.2 | 38.4 | |
F1 24 (2024) | 216 | 201 | 162.5 | 54.1 |
排放与电量 - 电池寿命低于平均水平的联想 LOQ
噪音排放
在噪音方面,这款笔记本电脑的表现符合同类产品的预期:在负载情况下,它会产生大量噪音。玩《赛博朋克 2077》时产生的噪音为 48 dB(A)(平衡模式)和 54 dB(A)(性能模式)。静音模式可将噪音水平降至更适中的数值,但代价是笔记本电脑的性能下降。在降低设置的情况下,仍然可以玩游戏。
风扇控制需要重新调整:怠速运转时,风扇会反复短暂启动--从长远来看,这种行为非常恼人。有时,风扇还会持续运转,声音清晰可闻。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26 / 34 / 36 dB(A) |
Load |
| 48 / 50 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13450HX, Micron 2400 MTFDKCD1T0QFM | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI | HP Victus 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 14% | -4% | 4% | 20% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 23 8% | 26 -4% | 25 -0% | 23 8% |
Idle Minimum * | 26 | 23 12% | 30 -15% | 28 -8% | 23 12% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 23 32% | 32 6% | 29 15% | 23 32% |
Idle Maximum * | 36 | 23 36% | 35 3% | 33 8% | 27.96 22% |
Load Average * | 48 | 38.92 19% | 51 -6% | 45 6% | 27.96 42% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48 | 52.06 -8% | |||
Load Maximum * | 50 | 52.09 -4% | 54 -8% | 48 4% | 47.89 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.96 | 51 | 43 | 47.89 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载情况下(压力测试、赛博朋克),笔记本电脑会明显发热:有时会超过 50 摄氏度。在日常使用(办公、上网)过程中,它的温度值也高于许多对比设备。掌托的温度保持在半合理状态。
极端情况(使用 Prime95 和 Furmark 进行连续运行压力测试)检查了系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。CPU 主频约为 2.4 GHz(P)和 2.6 GHz(E),图形核心的频率约为 1,800 MHz。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -8% | 9% | 15% | -3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 52 -11% | 41 13% | 50 -6% | 49 -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 58 | 61 -5% | 43 26% | 50 14% | 58 -0% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 35 -9% | 32 -0% | 25 22% | 35 -9% |
Idle Bottom * | 36 | 39 -8% | 37 -3% | 26 28% | 35 3% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
立体声扬声器产生的音效总体上可以接受。不过,多一点低音也未尝不可。
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.12 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
对于已安装的硬件来说,它的功耗非常正常。赛博朋克和压力测试都是在耗电量相对稳定的情况下进行的。电源装置的功率为 230 瓦,刚好够用。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 20% | 2% | 1% | 6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13 | 9.3 28% | 12 8% | 9 31% | 11 15% |
Idle Average * | 18 | 12.9 28% | 13 28% | 15 17% | 14.8 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 24 | 12.8 47% | 27 -13% | 23 4% | 16.8 30% |
Load Average * | 85 | 105 -24% | 123 -45% | 103.7 -22% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 155.7 | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 150.9 | ||||
Load Maximum * | 232 | 286 -23% | 210 9% | 241 -4% | 255 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 167 | 167.8 | 143.7 | 185 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
在我们的实际 WLAN 测试中,这款 15.6 英寸设备的运行时间为 5:20 小时(使用脚本访问网站时的负载映射),这并不是一个出色的数值。其电池容量(60 瓦时)相对较低,这一点显而易见。
Pros
Cons
评语 - 经济实惠的游戏机
LOQ 允许在高至最高设置下进行全高清游戏--酷睿 i5-13450HX 酷睿 i5-13450HX和 GeForce RTX 4060使之成为可能。这样,CPU 和 GPU 就能以持续的高时钟频率运行。PCIe 4 SSD(1 TB)可确保缩短加载时间。
联想的 LOQ 15IRX9 是一款经济实惠的全高清游戏笔记本电脑,但也存在一两个小瑕疵。
使用静音模式可以将高辐射降至中等水平,但代价是笔记本电脑的性能下降。它的风扇控制也需要改进:在空闲模式下,风扇会持续运行或脉动,这完全没有必要。
联想坚持使用 16:9 长宽比的屏幕,让你白白寻找 16:10 的屏幕。安装的 15.6 英寸面板(FHD、144 Hz、G-Sync、sRGB)效果不错,但亮度还可以再提高一些。这款笔记本电脑不提供 Thunderbolt 4 或 USB 4 接口。不过:它的 USB-C 端口(USB 3.2 Gen 2)支持 Power Delivery 和 Display ALT 模式。该设备的电池续航时间不会打破任何世界纪录。
您可以选择 技嘉 G6X 9KG.它的 CPU 性能稍强,采用 16 英寸 16:10 屏幕,运行时间也更长。在色彩空间覆盖率方面,它落后于 LOQ。
价格和供应情况
在撰写本文时,我们配置的联想LOQ 15IRX9可以通过亚马逊以1279美元的价格购买。
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 此处.
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
-
07/08/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.