惠普 Victus 16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测:RTX 4060 性能强劲,运行时间长
惠普的 Victus 系列包括入门级到中端游戏笔记本电脑,本次测试的设备可归类为后者:搭载 Raptor Lake 处理器、 GeForce RTX 406016GB内存和512GB固态硬盘,总价约1600美元。竞争对手包括 技嘉 G6X 9KG (2024), 戴尔 G16, 华硕 TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS和 联想Legion 5 16IRX G9.
2024 版 Victus 16 的构造与 2023 版完全相同。我们已经测试了后者的两个版本(RTX 4050 和 2023)。RTX 4050和 RTX 4070).
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | HP Victus 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
83.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 25.1 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.65 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S | 2.2 kg | 22.1 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接性 - HP Victus 具有 Power Delivery 功能
你不能指望它采用高品质的材料:笔记本电脑的整个外壳由哑光塑料制成,配色为 "云母银"--一种深灰色的炭黑色。盖子和底座可以扭转。它的后壳没有使用 LED 元件,最醒目的配件是盖子背面的 Victus 徽标。取下底盖部分后,就可以看到电池(用螺丝固定,而非胶粘)和其他硬件。
寻找 Thunderbolt 和 USB 4 是徒劳的:所有四个 USB 端口(3 个 USB-A、1 个 USB-C)均采用 USB 3.2 Gen 1 标准。USB-C 端口支持 Power Delivery 并能输出 DisplayPort 信号。这款笔记本电脑总共有两个视频输出端口(1 个 HDMI,1 个 DP)。其网络摄像头(210 万像素,带盖)效果一般。它没有配备 SD 读卡器。
Victus 配备了 Realtek WiFi 6 芯片(RTL8852BE),无法与竞争对手的英特尔芯片相媲美:我们测得的 WiFi 数据传输速率还算不错,但还达不到当今的水平。
输入设备 - 带有小方向键的惠普笔记本电脑
这款 Chiclet 键盘的按键(RGB 灯光、数字键盘)十分平滑,键程较短,按压点清晰。但按键的阻力可能会更大一些。键入时键盘会轻微弹跳。缺点方向键和回车键都相对较小。点击板(12.5 x 7.5 厘米)的键程较短,按压点清晰,可作为鼠标的替代品。
显示屏 - 色彩准确度较低的 IPS 面板
惠普为 Victus 配备了视角稳定的 144 Hz 面板(FHD、IPS),纵横比为 16:9。它在所有亮度水平下都不会出现任何 PWM 闪烁。16.1 英寸显示屏的亮度和对比度是为室内使用而设计的,尚未达到目标值(大于 300 cd/m²)。只要阳光不是太强烈,在室外也可以阅读。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 287 cd/m²
Contrast: 1511:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.52
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
42.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.108
HP Victus 16 (2024) Chi Mei CMN163E, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) BOE NE160WUM-NX6, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Chi Mei CMN161D (160GME), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NE160QDM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 62% | 70% | 64% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.3 | 41.8 1% | 67.5 63% | 72.4 75% | 69.3 68% |
sRGB Coverage | 61.7 | 62.4 1% | 98.5 60% | 100 62% | 97.3 58% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.7 | 43.3 1% | 69.3 62% | 74.1 74% | 70.7 66% |
Response Times | -29% | 59% | 55% | 46% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.6 ? | 40.5 ? -42% | 7.6 ? 73% | 12.5 ? 56% | 15.6 ? 45% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18.7 ? | 21.6 ? -16% | 10.4 ? 44% | 8.7 ? 53% | 10 ? 47% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 6% | 21% | 45% | 29% | |
Brightness middle | 287 | 353 23% | 369 29% | 526 83% | 301 5% |
Brightness | 288 | 318 10% | 344 19% | 500 74% | 294 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 81 -6% | 89 3% | 87 1% | 94 9% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.21 -11% | 0.26 -37% | 0.33 -74% | 0.21 -11% |
Contrast | 1511 | 1681 11% | 1419 -6% | 1594 5% | 1433 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.46 | 5.21 5% | 3.04 44% | 1.2 78% | 1.79 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.36 | 19.95 2% | 5.56 73% | 2.1 90% | 3.48 83% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.52 | 3.61 -3% | 2.35 33% | 1 72% | 1.2 66% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 3.6 25% | 3.38 30% | 1.3 73% | 2.5 48% |
Gamma | 2.108 104% | 2.367 93% | 2.47 89% | 2.23 99% | 2.265 97% |
CCT | 6442 101% | 7138 91% | 6040 108% | 6391 102% | 6157 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
0% | 47% /
35% | 57% /
52% | 46% /
39% |
* ... smaller is better
该面板无法再现常见的色彩空间(AdobeRGB、sRGB、DCI-P3)。在这方面,一些竞争对手的屏幕能提供更多。它的色彩还原能力也不是最好的:它的出厂偏差值为 5.5,校准后会降低到 3.5 左右--无论如何,它的目标值(DeltaE < 3)都没有达到。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.6 ms rise | |
↘ 9.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.3 ms rise | |
↘ 15.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 猛禽湖和艾达-拉芙蕾丝提供蒸汽
惠普提供多种配置版本的 Victus 16。目前最便宜的 Victus 16 r1000 系列版本售价约为 1300 美元(酷睿 i5-14500HX、GeForce RTX 4050、16 GB 内存、512 GB 固态硬盘、无 Windows)。如果要购买本测试设备,则需要花费约 1600 美元。
测试条件
有三种惠普特有的系统模式(见表)供用户选择。我们在测试中使用了 "平衡"(基准测试)和 "ECO"(电池测试)模式。可通过组合键(Fn + P)快速更改模式。Omen Gaming Hub"(笔记本电脑的控制中心)也可以让你选择模式。此外,它还允许对 CPU 进行欠压,并设置单独的风扇曲线等。
平衡 | 性能 | 环保 | |
---|---|---|---|
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 130 瓦 | 130 瓦 | 130 瓦 |
功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 130 瓦 | 130 瓦 | 130 瓦 |
性能 (Witcher 3) | 98 帧/秒 | 100 帧/秒 | 60 帧/秒(锁定) |
噪音 (Witcher 3) | 43 dB(A) | 52 dB(A) | 38 dB(A) |
处理器
酷睿 i7-14700HX 酷睿 i7-14700HXRaptor Lake)的 20 个 CPU 内核(8P + 12E = 28 个线程)实现了 5.5 GHz(P)和 3.9 GHz(E)的最高时钟频率。永久多线程负载(CB15 Loop)导致时钟频率从第一次运行到第四次运行("平衡")一直下降。之后,时钟速率保持稳定。"性能 "导致时钟频率持续升高。
基准测试结果有点令人失望:尽管增加了四个 CPU 内核和更高的时钟频率,该 CPU 仍无法与Legion 5 16IRX G9 Core i7-14650HX 拉开距离。其多线程性能几乎相同,而 14650HX 则在单线程性能方面明显胜出。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS -2! |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (8361 - 10498, n=7) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (651 - 821, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (3328 - 4137, n=7) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (238 - 304, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (126 - 184, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) |
Geekbench 6.3 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (14807 - 17562, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (6.2.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1, Leistung) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Single-Core | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (2378 - 2975, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1, Leistung) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (22 - 27.4, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.3.4.2) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.3.4.2) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (41.9 - 55.3, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (6.3.4.2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.3.4.2. Leistung) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.3.4.2) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (0.3821 - 0.4896, n=7) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Leistung) | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (16932 - 23676, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Leistung) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (86338 - 116556, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Leistung) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (4008 - 5567, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (129836 - 152200, n=7) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Leistung) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (11704 - 14434, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Leistung) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Leistung) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (42125 - 58380, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Leistung) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (82161 - 113157, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Leistung) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (1177 - 1682, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (9029 - 12928, n=7) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Leistung) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (39151 - 49671, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Leistung) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) |
系统性能
运行流畅的系统可为游戏、渲染和流媒体等要求苛刻的应用提供足够的性能。内存的传输速率达到了 DDR5-5600 内存的正常水平。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7528 - 8278, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (10778 - 11087, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9823 - 9910, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (10841 - 14135, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1923 - 2132, n=2) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1782 - 1973, n=2) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=146, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2107 - 2399, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1835 - 1885, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (276 - 301, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 328, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (251 - 273, n=2) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (467 - 542, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7528 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (63949 - 78742, n=7) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (68593 - 86175, n=7) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (64033 - 76689, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (82.7 - 96.4, n=7) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
检查笔记本电脑的延迟(网上冲浪、4K 视频播放、Prime95 高负载)发现了一些异常情况。目前的硬件和软件组合似乎并不适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会带来改变。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Kioxia 的 PCIe 4 固态硬盘(M.2-2280)容量为 512 GB,传输速率良好。在 DiskSpd 循环过程中,由于热节流,其数据传输速率逐步降低。笔记本电脑有空间安装第二块固态硬盘。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
中端 GeForce RTX 4060GPU(3,072 个着色器、128 位总线、8 GB GDDR6、120 瓦)允许使用高至最高设置进行全高清游戏。其基准值和帧率略高于 RTX 4060 的平均值("平衡")。性能 "配置文件则略胜一筹。高级 Optimus 不支持。这意味着在 dGPU 和 Optimus 之间切换需要重新启动。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (28136 - 38912, n=56) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (20533 - 29656, n=53) | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7484 - 11451, n=55) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
3DMark 11 Performance | 30439 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24569 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10542 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (3.3.3) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (3.3.3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (19 - 28, n=52) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (3.3.3) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (3.3.3, Leistung) | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (3.3.3) | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (3.3.3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (39 - 53, n=52) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (3.3.3) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (3.3.3) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (3.3.3, Leistung) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (3.3.3) | |
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years) | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (3.3.3) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (3.3.3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (189 - 452, n=52) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (3.3.3) | |
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (3.3.3) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (3.3.3) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (3.3.3, Leistung) |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
OpenCL Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=189, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (5039 - 112238, n=52) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Vulkan Score 5.5 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (Leistung) | |
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (28838 - 87612, n=30) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
Geekbench 6.3 | |
GPU OpenCL | |
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (4321 - 100831, n=39) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1, Leistung) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (6.2.1) | |
GPU Vulkan | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1, Leistung) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (4286 - 196201, n=105, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (4286 - 101001, n=35) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (6.2.1) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) |
V-Ray 5 Benchmark | |
GPU RTX | |
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (5.0.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (5.0.1, Leistung) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (5.0.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1387 - 1817, n=28) | |
GPU CUDA | |
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (5.0.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (5.0.1, Leistung) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (957 - 1294, n=29) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (5.0.1) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (5.0.1) | |
CPU | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=117, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8364 - 21065, n=28) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (5.0.1) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (5.0.1) |
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | |
GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v4.10.07 ) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v4.10.07, Leistung) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (483 - 715, n=45) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v4.10.07 ) | |
CPU | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v4.10.07, Leistung) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v4.10.07 ) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (12680 - 32360, n=45) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v4.10.07 ) |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (77 - 159.7, n=42) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (76.9 - 126.3, n=47) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (75.1 - 109.8, n=50) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (135.3 - 210, n=49) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (115 - 183.8, n=52) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (60.7 - 141.1, n=53) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (2.02) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (2.02, Leistung) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (56.4 - 93.1, n=30) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (2.11) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (2.02) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (2.02) | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 110, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (2.02) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (2.11) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (32.9 - 51.8, n=19) | |
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) | |
Average of class Gaming (11.9 - 77.7, n=54, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (2.02, Leistung) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (23.6 - 37.4, n=21) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (2.02) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) (2.02) |
Dragon's Dogma 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (49.5 - 80, n=8, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (57.2 - 67.7, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 |
Palworld - 1920x1080 Epic Preset AA:TSR | |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (83.9 - 87.8, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (20.9 - 150.9, n=8, last 2 years) |
The Finals | |
1920x1080 Epic Preset | |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (122.3 - 126, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 211, n=12, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic RTX Global Illumination | |
Average of class Gaming (51.1 - 190.8, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (116.8 - 121.1, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
EA Sports WRC - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:Epic AF:16x | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (78.4 - 79.6, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 | |
Average of class Gaming (15.4 - 115.1, n=7, last 2 years) |
Enshrouded - 1920x1080 Max. Quality AA:FX | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (9.48 - 101.5, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (43 - 51.1, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 185.8 | 181.2 | 176.1 | 110.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 448.6 | 297.7 | 181.9 | 99.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 198.1 | 177.8 | 168.4 | 149.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 208 | 135.3 | 98.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 154.4 | 129.2 | 100.3 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 406 | 253 | 205 | 179 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 113.6 | 90 | 76.9 | 67.1 |
EA Sports WRC (2023) | 129.3 | 93.7 | 85.2 | 79.6 |
The Finals (2023) | 196.7 | 161.7 | 155.9 | 122.3 |
Palworld (2024) | 139.2 | 116.3 | 91.8 | 83.9 |
Enshrouded (2024) | 85.5 | 71.2 | 59.7 | 51.1 |
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 67.1 | 63.3 |
排放与功率 - 运行时间惊人的游戏笔记本电脑
噪音排放
风扇的转速通常尽可能低,只有在别无选择的情况下才加快转速。不过,在满负荷("平衡")情况下,设备的噪音最高可达 48 dB(A)。而 "高性能 "时的噪音值甚至更高。使用 "Eco "模式可以大大降低使用噪音。
在空闲模式或低负载情况下,风扇有可能完全静止。不过,惠普生物IOS 中的 "风扇常开 "选项(默认情况下处于激活状态)必须关闭。否则,它将确保风扇始终运行。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28 / 29 / 33 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45 / 48 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
HP Victus 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | 13% | -3% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 26 -4% | 23 8% | 24 4% | 25 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 30 -7% | 23 18% | 24 14% | 25 11% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 32 -10% | 23 21% | 28.8 1% | 26 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 33 | 35 -6% | 27.96 15% | 32 3% | 28 15% |
Load Average * | 45 | 51 -13% | 27.96 38% | 45.5 -1% | 43 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 51 -19% | 47.89 -11% | 53.1 -23% | 51 -19% |
Load Maximum * | 48 | 54 -13% | 47.89 -0% | 55.7 -16% | 53 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
压力测试和 Witcher 3测试导致笔记本电脑明显发热。在测试过程中,某些点的温度达到了 50 °C。在日常使用中(办公、上网),温度值一般保持在绿色范围内。
极限压力测试场景(Prime95 和 Furmark 连续运行)检查系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。CPU 时钟在开始时有所波动,但随后稳定在较低水平。GPU 几乎全功率运行。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
HP Victus 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -10% | -22% | -7% | -9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 41 18% | 49 2% | 40.4 19% | 53 -6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50 | 43 14% | 58 -16% | 43.8 12% | 48 4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 32 -28% | 35 -40% | 30.3 -21% | 30 -20% |
Idle Bottom * | 26 | 37 -42% | 35 -35% | 35.3 -36% | 30 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
这款笔记本电脑的立体声扬声器整体音效不错,但低音还需加强。
HP Victus 16 (2024) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
对于已安装的硬件来说,它的功耗非常正常。虽然 Witcher 3 但在压力测试开始时,笔记本电脑的耗电量会出现波动。电源装置(230 瓦)的功率足够大。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
Idle | 9 / 15 / 23 Watt |
Load |
123 / 241 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
在我们的实际 WLAN 测试中,16.1 英寸设备的运行时间达到了 8:31 小时(说明使用脚本访问网站时的负载情况)--这是一个非常不错的数值。在同类产品中,只有 华硕 TUF Gaming A16做得更好。
Pros
Cons
结论:一款可靠的中端游戏笔记本电脑
Victus 允许以高至最高设置进行全高清游戏。所需的动力由 酷睿 i7-14700HX和 GeForce RTX 4060.可惜:CPU 的单核性能略低于可能达到的水平。作为同类产品的标准配置,它的排放量可以通过牺牲部分性能降至中等水平。优点在满载状态下,笔记本电脑的噪音排放是可以接受的。
惠普的存储贪婪:1600 美元的游戏笔记本电脑需要提供更多存储空间。
惠普没有加入 16:10 的行列,而是坚持使用 16:9 的宽高比:安装的 16.1 英寸面板(FHD、144 Hz)还不错,但考虑到该设备约 1600 美元的价格,它确实应该提供更好的色彩空间覆盖率。对于一款游戏笔记本电脑来说,512 GB 的存储空间并不算大。你也会期望它在这方面有更高的性价比。
惠普没有为这款笔记本电脑配备 Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 等现代连接,但即便如此,它也没有忘记 Power Delivery 等实用功能--电池可通过 USB-C 电源(100 瓦)充电。正面:充满电的电池足以支持 8.5 小时左右的 WiFi 运行时间,这是许多其他游戏笔记本电脑梦寐以求的。
另一个可行的选择是 技嘉 G6X 9KG (2024).这款笔记本电脑的计算能力相当,运行时间也同样出色,但它采用的不是 16:9 面板,而是 16:10 面板。
价格和供应情况
HP Victus 16 (2024)
- 05/14/2024 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.