Notebookcheck Logo

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测:来自德国的高级金属外壳游戏机

更经济实惠的 Fusion 15 新款 XMG Core 15 采用与 XMG Focus 15 相同的优质时尚金属外壳。这使它成为创作者的潜在关注点,同时价格也比 Fusion 便宜不少。我们将探讨申克在哪些方面降低了成本,以及新的 Core 15 对于注重价格的创作者和游戏玩家来说是否是一个不错的选择。
AMD Business Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Ryzen (Zen)

据申克称,目前的 Core 15 是一款略微缩小的 Fusion 15.尽管如此,Core 15 仍保留了光滑的金属外壳,给人以良好的外观和感觉。制造商称其为 "卧底游戏",因为铝制外壳也应该吸引创作者,而不一定是游戏笔记本电脑。

不过,酷睿 15 不仅缩小了尺寸,还改变了一些东西。例如,笔记本处理器由英特尔 Gen14 HX CPU 改为当前一代的 AMD Ryzen 处理器,这在一定程度上降低了价格,但绝非更差。

由于目前几乎不再有 15 英寸笔记本电脑配备当前的 CPU,因此我们将 15.3 英寸酷睿 15 与 16 英寸游戏和多媒体笔记本电脑进行比较,后者配备了 RTX 4060戴尔 G16联想Legion 5i 16 G9以及 惠普 Victus 16.此外,我们当然还与 Fusion 15 进行了比较,并对自去年的 申克 XMG Pro 15 E23.

注意:我们的新评级系统是 V8,这意味着现在的分数更低了。在旧的 V7 评分系统 V7 下,Core 15 的得分在 88% 到 89% 之间。您可以 这里。

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (XMG Core 15 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 555.85, Optimus + MUX
Memory
32 MB 
, 2x 16 GB Kingston DDR5-5600
Display
15.30 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 197 PPI, BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 (BOE0C8E), IPS, sRGB, glossy: no, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2 2280, 894 GB free
Soundcard
Conexant SN6140
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset, Card Reader: Full SD, SDXC, SDHC
Networking
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21.9 x 342.5 x 245
Battery
99.8 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: Full HD Webcam
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, USB Driver Stick, Mousepad, 24 Months Warranty, Pickup & Return
Weight
2.052 kg, Power Supply: 617 g
Price
1650 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.4 %
06/2024
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg21.9 mm15.30"2560x1600
89.1 %
02/2024
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg25.2 mm16.00"2560x1600
84.3 %
05/2024
HP Victus 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.9 mm16.10"1920x1080
85.5 %
02/2024
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg25.65 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.9 %
05/2024
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg21.9 mm15.30"2560x1600
86.2 %
07/2023
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg24.9 mm15.60"2560x1440

尺寸比较

目前,采用当前 CPU 的 15 英寸游戏机似乎已几乎绝迹,而酷睿 15 的独特之处就在于其不同寻常的 15.3 英寸规格。制造商认为,目前的 16 英寸笔记本电脑几乎没有更大的,这意味着你现在可以在几乎相同尺寸的机箱中获得更大的显示屏。

然而,在酷睿 15 上,你可以看到一些 16 英寸的竞争对手明显更大了。除此之外,它们还更厚更重。尽管竞争对手使用了更多的塑料,但酷睿 15 的厚度和重量却更胜一筹。在这一点上,Core 15 为移动性加分。

尺寸比较

369 mm 259.4 mm 23.9 mm 2.4 kg359.7 mm 262.3 mm 25.2 mm 2.4 kg357 mm 289 mm 25.65 mm 2.8 kg350 mm 240 mm 24.9 mm 2.4 kg342.5 mm 245 mm 21.9 mm 2.1 kg342.5 mm 245 mm 21.9 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

港口

与配备英特尔 CPU 的 Fusion 不同,AMD Core 没有配备 Thunderbolt 4 和 USB 4。取而代之的是 USB-C 3.2 Gen 2,尽管它提供高达 100 W(20V,5 A)的功率传输。

与 Fusion 相比,Core 还有一个额外的优势:与 Fusion 相比,Core 还拥有 Fusion 所没有的专用 mini DisplayPort。

一个有趣的附带说明:2023 年初,我们最近评测过的 最近评测的酷睿 15仍配备了用于外部散热的 XMG Oasis 水接口。现在,在更新、更轻薄的酷睿 15 上已经没有这些接口了,看来 XMG 已经放弃了对这一生产系列的尝试。

左:Kensington、USB-A(5 Gb/s)、USB-C(5 Gb/s,无附加功能)、3.5 毫米耳机插孔
左:Kensington、USB-A(5 Gb/s)、USB-C(5 Gb/s,无附加功能)、3.5 毫米耳机插孔
右侧SD 阅读器,2 个 USB-A(5 Gb/秒)
右侧SD 阅读器,2 个 USB-A(5 Gb/秒)
后部MiniDP 1.4(兼容 G-Sync)、USB-C 3.2 Gen2(10 Gb/s、DP 1.4a、Power Delivery)、HDMI 2.1(兼容 G-Sync)、LAN、电源
后部MiniDP 1.4(兼容 G-Sync)、USB-C 3.2 Gen2(10 Gb/s、DP 1.4a、Power Delivery)、HDMI 2.1(兼容 G-Sync)、LAN、电源
正面:无端口
正面:无端口

SD 读卡器

AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘

SD 读卡器可以读取全尺寸的卡,但没有锁定装置,这意味着卡会伸出来。

遗憾的是,Fusion 15 的读卡器性能本来就很一般,现在又降低了一半,这意味着酷睿 15 属于同类产品中性能最慢的几款。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=97, last 2 years)
97.2 MB/s +154%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
82.4 (81.16min - 84.2max) MB/s +115%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
81 MB/s +111%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
38.3 (33.53min - 39.96max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
27.1 MB/s -29%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.1 MB/s +189%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
90.9 MB/s +117%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
82 MB/s +96%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
41.86 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
28.8 MB/s -31%

交流

制造商在收到笔记本后告诉我们,我们的评测机型不小心安装了英特尔 AX211 WiF,就像 Fusion 15 一样。事实上,酷睿 15 并非如此。

通常情况下,英特尔 AX200 是酷睿 15 的标准配置,只需额外支付 15 美元,就能获得配备 Wi-Fi 6E 的 AMD Wi-Fi 6E RZ616。不过,我们目前还无法测试其速度。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1570 (808min - 1639max) MBit/s +30%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1489 (1329min, 1338.28P1 - 1686max) MBit/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1378min - 1489max) MBit/s +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=155, last 2 years)
1255 MBit/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1208 (557min - 1301max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (565 - 1584, n=19)
1122 MBit/s -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
939 (475min - 965max) MBit/s -22%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Realtek RTL8852BE
776 (487min - 929max) MBit/s -36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1632 (1454min - 1700max) MBit/s +14%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1585 (1273min - 1662max) MBit/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1433 (616min - 1532max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1398 (1327min, 1333.09P1 - 1464max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=158, last 2 years)
1386 MBit/s -3%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (715 - 1711, n=19)
1222 MBit/s -15%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Realtek RTL8852BE
978 (960min - 990max) MBit/s -32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
941 (471min - 948max) MBit/s -34%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1189 (557-1301)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1489 (1329-1686)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø776 (487-929)
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1543 (808-1639)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (616-1532)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1398 (1327-1464)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø978 (960-990)
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1585 (1273-1662)
ColorChecker
15 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
12 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24): 10.95 ∆E min: 4.41 - max: 17.12 ∆E

输入设备 - 最大限度地利用空间

与 Fusion 15 不同,Core 15 没有单独的 RGB 键照明。相反,它只有一个照明区。虽然没有那么多可选的 LED 设置,但一切仍然清晰可见。

键盘还缺少 N 键翻转和防鬼键功能,至少根据数据表是这样。不过,您可以通过键盘上的按键切换性能配置文件。

键盘
键盘
触摸板
触摸板
1 区照明
1 区照明
中短途旅行,反馈良好
中短途旅行,反馈良好

显示屏 - 500 尼特、sRGB、1600p

背光不会明显出血
背光不会明显出血
亚像素
亚像素

Core 采用与 Fusion 相同的面板。虽然我们测得的亮度明显更高(600 尼特对 460 尼特),但这是以黑色水平为代价的,对比度因此受到影响。

在最低亮度下,显示屏的背光也太亮了,但仍然照得很均匀。

在亮度为 45% 左右(150 尼特)时,我们测得的亮度为 150 尼特。在较暗的显示屏下,色彩准确度和黑度都略有提高。

遗憾的是,没有其他显示屏可供选择,但显示屏亮度很高,响应时间足够快,没有 PWM,同样,背光出血也不明显。

575
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 (BOE0C8E) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 635 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 603.9 cd/m² Minimum: 30.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 635 cd/m²
Contrast: 992:1 (Black: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.99, calibrated: 1.14
ΔE Greyscale 2.53 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
74.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 (BOE0C8E), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.30
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NE160QDM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Chi Mei CMN163E, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Chi Mei CMN161D (160GME), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.30
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
BOE0AD1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display
-1%
-42%
-5%
0%
16%
Display P3 Coverage
73.2
72.4
-1%
41.3
-44%
67.5
-8%
73.5
0%
97.8
34%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
61.7
-38%
98.5
-1%
100
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
74.6
74.1
-1%
42.7
-43%
69.3
-7%
75
1%
85.4
14%
Response Times
-13%
-151%
4%
46%
-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.6 ?(4.6, 5)
12.5 ?(6.1, 6.4)
-30%
28.6 ?(13.3, 15.3)
-198%
7.6 ?(3.8, 3.8)
21%
5 ?(2.3, 2.7)
48%
14 ?(6.6, 7.4)
-46%
Response Time Black / White *
9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6)
8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1)
5%
18.7 ?(9.6, 9.1)
-103%
10.4 ?(5.8, 4.6)
-13%
5.2 ?(1.5, 3.7)
43%
9.6 ?(4.2, 5.4)
-4%
PWM Frequency
Screen
22%
-114%
-29%
-11%
-24%
Brightness middle
635
526
-17%
287
-55%
369
-42%
491
-23%
322
-49%
Brightness
604
500
-17%
288
-52%
344
-43%
460
-24%
301
-50%
Brightness Distribution
91
87
-4%
86
-5%
89
-2%
89
-2%
85
-7%
Black Level *
0.64
0.33
48%
0.19
70%
0.26
59%
0.47
27%
0.36
44%
Contrast
992
1594
61%
1511
52%
1419
43%
1045
5%
894
-10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.89
1.2
37%
5.46
-189%
3.04
-61%
2.16
-14%
1.98
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.14
2.1
33%
20.36
-548%
5.56
-77%
4.44
-41%
5.24
-67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.14
1
12%
3.52
-209%
2.35
-106%
1.14
-0%
1.98
-74%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.53
1.3
49%
4.8
-90%
3.38
-34%
3.3
-30%
2.44
4%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.23 99%
2.108 104%
2.47 89%
2.204 100%
2.42 91%
CCT
6434 101%
6391 102%
6442 101%
6040 108%
6286 103%
6984 93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 13%
-102% / -104%
-10% / -19%
12% / -1%
-11% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

色彩空间覆盖率

与 Fusion 15 一样,sRGB 完全覆盖,P3 和 AdobeRGB 约为 73% 至 75%。

sRGB
sRGB
显示 P3
显示 P3
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB

色彩精度

开箱后,面板的校准效果不错,DeltaE 值低于 3。不过,黑色值明显过高。将亮度降低到 150 尼特不仅能改善这种情况,还能使 DeltaE 值略有下降。

在原生最大亮度下进行手动校准,尽管亮度值已经不错,但仍有奇效,能明显减小偏差。因此,面板的校准效果非常好,至少在 sRGB 下色彩准确度非常高。在最大亮度下,黑色值仍然过高,导致对比度下降。

灰阶
灰阶
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检查器
颜色检查器
灰度为 150 尼特
灰度为 150 尼特
150 尼特的饱和度
150 尼特的饱和度
150 尼特的 ColorChecker
150 尼特的 ColorChecker
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和度
校准后的饱和度
校准后的 ColorChecker
校准后的 ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise
↘ 4.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17655 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

0% 亮度
0% 亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

高亮度和哑光显示屏确保您在阴暗处使用该设备时不会有太大问题,内容仍然清晰可辨。不过,对比度可以再高一些,而且应避免阳光直射。

树荫下,从正面直视
树荫下,从正面直视
树荫下的广阔视角
树荫下的广阔视角
良好的视角稳定性
良好的视角稳定性

性能 - 比配备 HX 和 RTX 4070 的 Fusion 慢 20

使用 Ryzen 7 8845HS, RTX 4060和 32GB 内存,XMG 酷睿 15 将自己定位为中端游戏笔记本电脑,并以此为市场定位。其黑色、相对纤薄、时尚的全铝外壳赋予了这款笔记本电脑低调的外观,这也会让内容创作者对它产生兴趣。令人遗憾的是,申克公司没有提供任何额外的显示选项,因为校准良好的屏幕 "只能 "显示 sRGB。这对于照片编辑,尤其是视频编辑来说,可能是一个不必要的破坏性标准。因此,我们也希望将来能看到 DisplayP3 选项。

测试条件

在通用控制中心 (Tulpar例如,Tulpar 使用相同的 CC)中,提供了 3 个预设性能配置文件(平衡、发烧、超增压)和一个手动配置文件。在后者中,可以激活风扇增压,并定义 CPU 目标温度、风扇曲线等。在通过 MUX 进行的常规设置下,GPU 可从混合型切换为 dGPU,随后需要重新启动。

在性能基准测试中,我们选择了超频模式,在电池测试中则使用了平衡模式。我们还提供了其他模式下的性能值。

控制中心主菜单
控制中心主菜单
性能简介
性能简介
手动配置文件
手动配置文件
手动风扇外形
手动风扇外形

处理器

Cinebench R15:超增压
Cinebench R15:超增压
Cinebench R15:爱好者
Cinebench R15:爱好者
Cinebench R15:平衡
Cinebench R15:平衡
Cinebench R15:电池
Cinebench R15:电池

所有酷睿 15 SKU 均配备相同的处理器。处理器 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS是采用 Zen 4 架构的鹰点系列中速度第二快的 CPU。它拥有 8 个内核和超线程技术,这意味着它可以同时处理 16 个线程。这些内核的基本时钟频率为 3.8 GHz,可单独超频至 5.1 GHz。

在 Cinebench R15 连续测试中,我们的 AMD Core 15 表现非常稳定,但主要低于配备英特尔 Gen14 HX CPU 的笔记本电脑。这其实并不奇怪,因为 AMD CPU 的最大功耗仅为短暂的 90 W,而较长时间的功耗为 80 W。只有戴尔 G16 在较好的起始性能后,耗电量低于 Ryzen 7 在酷睿中的稳定性能水平。

在所有 CPU 测试中,我们的 Ryzen 7 完全达到了目标。但遗憾的是,我们的酷睿再次排名最后,因为其英特尔 HX 竞争对手的性能更强一些。不过,与戴尔 G16 或惠普 Victus 16 的差距确实微乎其微。Legion 5i 或搭载英特尔处理器的 Fusion 15 优势明显。

在 Cinebench R15 多核测试中,离墙性能下降了约 35%。

性能配置文件/测量值 Cinebench R15 首次运行得分 CPU 功耗,单位 W
超频 2,908 持续 80 - 94
发烧级 2,749 短时间 90,然后 65
平衡型 2,277 短时间 59,然后 35
电池 1,909 短时间 30,然后 25

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

019539058578097511701365156017551950214523402535273029253120331535103705Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2849 (2832.66-2908.03)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX: Ø3471 (3409.19-3799.39)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø2658 (2509.88-3812.18)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3246 (3155.57-3458.12)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
84.4 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
82.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX
76 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
71.7 pt
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
70 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
69.9 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
 
66.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
24574 Points +36%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
24455 Points +36%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
23887 Points +32%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23124 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=212, last 2 years)
20669 Points +15%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
20557 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
18037 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (15889 - 18037, n=3)
16685 Points -7%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2043 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
1963 Points +11%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
1881 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
1867 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=210, last 2 years)
1845 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1775 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1716 - 1783, n=3)
1758 Points -1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
1702 Points -4%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
9349 Points +33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
9250 Points +32%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
9244 Points +32%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8465 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=210, last 2 years)
7859 Points +12%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
7821 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
7026 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (6231 - 7026, n=3)
6534 Points -7%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
779 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
754 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
722 Points +5%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
721 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 855, n=210, last 2 years)
710 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
690 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (677 - 691, n=3)
686 Points -1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
651 Points -6%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
3913 (3186.24min - 3913.13max) Points +35%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
3812 Points +31%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
3799 (3409.19min - 3799.39max) Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3458 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=214, last 2 years)
3250 Points +12%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
3015 (2802.3min - 3015.45max) Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2908 (2832.66min - 2908.03max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (2537 - 2908, n=3)
2667 Points -8%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
287 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
287 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
280 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (274 - 280, n=3)
278 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (198 - 318, n=213, last 2 years)
272 Points -3%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
269 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
247 Points -12%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
238 Points -15%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (179 - 216, n=3)
197.3 Seconds * -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=205, last 2 years)
182.2 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
179 Seconds *
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
173 Seconds * +3%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
165 Seconds * +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
148 Seconds * +17%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
141 Seconds * +21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
138 Seconds * +23%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
97929 MIPS +31%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
93686 MIPS +25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
90675 MIPS +21%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
84799 MIPS +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=208, last 2 years)
81141 MIPS +9%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
76328 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
74664 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (65072 - 74664, n=3)
70156 MIPS -6%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7508 MIPS +14%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
6695 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6571 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (6274 - 6644, n=3)
6496 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6340 MIPS -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (4502 - 7581, n=208, last 2 years)
6212 MIPS -5%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
5944 MIPS -10%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
5641 MIPS -14%
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
16196 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
16010 Points +14%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
14807 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=88, last 2 years)
14314 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
14014 Points
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
13711 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (11073 - 14014, n=7)
12778 Points -9%
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3081 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
2761 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2686 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1599 - 3129, n=88, last 2 years)
2656 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (2540 - 2698, n=5)
2629 Points -2%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
2562 Points -5%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2378 Points -11%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
17614 Points +38%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17214 Points +35%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
16810 Points +32%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
16732 Points +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=213, last 2 years)
14258 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12726 Points
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
12509 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (11802 - 12726, n=4)
12169 Points -4%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2107 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1971 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1875 - 1991, n=4)
1949 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
1933 Points -2%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
1866 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1196 - 2210, n=213, last 2 years)
1845 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
1818 Points -8%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
1700 Points -14%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
25.6 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
24 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
23.5 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
22.7 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=209, last 2 years)
22.3 fps -2%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
22 fps -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (18.6 - 22.7, n=3)
20.6 fps -9%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
20.1 fps -11%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
55.3 s * -12%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
53.4 s * -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
51.1 s * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
49.2 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=205, last 2 years)
48.1 s * +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (47.1 - 49.2, n=3)
47.9 s * +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
43.8 s * +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
38.9 s * +21%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
0.4896 sec * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4564 sec * -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.658, n=208, last 2 years)
0.4465 sec * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (0.4383 - 0.4464, n=3)
0.4413 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4383 sec *
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
0.4217 sec * +4%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX
0.4217 sec * +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX
0.4195 sec * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.365 sec * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2908 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
229 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
280 Points
Help
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
87.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
 
82.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
77.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
76.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
70.7 pt
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
70.2 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
69.5 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
29544 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (25916 - 29544, n=3)
27140 KRay/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=205, last 2 years)
20255 KRay/s -31%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
20224 KRay/s -32%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
19044 KRay/s -36%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
18836 KRay/s -36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
17906 KRay/s -39%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
16932 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
125873 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (109747 - 125873, n=3)
115216 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
104545 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=205, last 2 years)
101005 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95763 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95271 Points -24%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93053 Points -26%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86338 Points -31%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5293 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
5180 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (4627 - 5180, n=3)
4834 MB/s -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4747 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=205, last 2 years)
4620 MB/s -11%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4256 MB/s -18%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4214 MB/s -19%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4008 MB/s -23%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
133669 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131076 Points +5%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
129836 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
124695 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (114899 - 124695, n=3)
118559 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (41257 - 200651, n=205, last 2 years)
113384 Points -9%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
108955 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
101500 Points -19%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
15519 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (14876 - 15519, n=3)
15112 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13913 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (3925 - 32988, n=205, last 2 years)
12675 Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
12458 Points -20%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
11913 Points -23%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
11704 Points -25%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10802 Points -30%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67367 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (58597 - 67367, n=3)
61576 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=205, last 2 years)
51225 Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
51088 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
47097 Points -30%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
45501 Points -32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
44710 Points -34%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
42125 Points -37%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
190740 MB/s +107%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=205, last 2 years)
110591 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
92203 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
92092 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86485 MB/s -6%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
85224 MB/s -7%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
82161 MB/s -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (67393 - 92092, n=3)
81686 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1485 MB/s +88%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1410 MB/s +79%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1289 MB/s +64%
Average of class Gaming
  (269 - 2409, n=205, last 2 years)
1279 MB/s +62%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1237 MB/s +57%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1177 MB/s +49%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (627 - 1048, n=3)
821 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
788 MB/s
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
15911 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (13875 - 15911, n=3)
14561 KRay/s -8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11009 KRay/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=205, last 2 years)
10943 KRay/s -31%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10344 KRay/s -35%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10316 KRay/s -35%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
9779 KRay/s -39%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
9029 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
50064 MPixel/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47411 MPixel/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
41668 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (39002 - 41668, n=3)
40305 MPixel/s -3%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
39448 MPixel/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=206, last 2 years)
38283 MPixel/s -8%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
36170 MPixel/s -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
33763 MPixel/s -19%

系统性能

虽然我们的评测系统在纯 CPU 分数上稍有落后,但在 PCMark 10 分数上却领先于 HX 竞争对手。在基本功能方面,它的得分处于中等水平,但在工作效率方面,它却遥遥领先,在内容创建方面更是名列前茅。

在 CrossMark 中,戴尔 G16 稍逊一筹,其他竞争对手稍稍领先于我们的 AMD Core 15。

PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8822 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
8822 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8522 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (5442 - 9852, n=185, last 2 years)
7659 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7645 Points -13%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
7528 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
7521 Points -15%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
7449 Points -16%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11815 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
11458 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10804 Points +7%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
10778 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (8829 - 12334, n=184, last 2 years)
10775 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10061 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
10061 Points 0%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
9532 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
14612 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
14612 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10731 Points -27%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
10510 Points -28%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
10070 Points -31%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
9910 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=184, last 2 years)
9797 Points -33%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9241 Points -37%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
13247 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12674 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
12674 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
12144 Points -4%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
11686 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=184, last 2 years)
11660 Points -8%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
10841 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
9588 Points -24%
CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2203 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2092 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1957 Points +4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
1923 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1889 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
1889 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=162, last 2 years)
1885 Points 0%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1842 Points -2%
CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2109 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1938 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1798 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=162, last 2 years)
1791 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1789 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
1789 Points 0%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
1782 Points 0%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1730 Points -3%
CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2358 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2336 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2212 Points +5%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2107 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2102 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
2102 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=162, last 2 years)
2058 Points -2%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
2020 Points -4%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2049 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1889 Points +17%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
1835 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1749 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=162, last 2 years)
1696 Points +5%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1686 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1613 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
1613 Points 0%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
342 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
323 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
311 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
305 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
305 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=186, last 2 years)
301 Points -1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
276 Points -10%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
268 Points -12%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
283 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
281 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
264 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
264 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=168, last 2 years)
263 Points 0%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
251 Points -5%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
542 ms * -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
516 ms * -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 737, n=197, last 2 years)
516 ms * -4%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
507 ms * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
496 ms *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
496 ms * -0%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
486 ms * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
431 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8822 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77669 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
76591 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
69523 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (67777 - 69523, n=3)
68941 MB/s -1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
66599 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=205, last 2 years)
61594 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
59727 MB/s -14%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
59266 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85867 MB/s +41%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84877 MB/s +39%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81049 MB/s +33%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
71455 MB/s +17%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67305 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 90647, n=205, last 2 years)
65596 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
61095 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (50572 - 61095, n=3)
57558 MB/s -6%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (86677 - 93239, n=3)
89127 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
87466 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
75215 MB/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72287 MB/s -17%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65204 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 103259, n=205, last 2 years)
63627 MB/s -27%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58028 MB/s -34%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
51138 MB/s -42%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
96.4 ns * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (85.6 - 101.8, n=3)
92 ns * -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=203, last 2 years)
90.9 ns * -6%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.8 ns * -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
89.8 ns * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
85.6 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84.1 ns * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.1 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

打开浏览器时,延迟极小,还不会造成任何问题。当打开多个浏览器标签页时,延迟值会有所增加。在播放 4K/60fps YouTube 视频时也是如此,内部 GPU 的负载率为 62%,似乎相当高。结果是出现了两次掉帧,并在延迟排名中名列第二。

YouTube 测试
YouTube 测试
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon 驱动程序列表
LatencyMon 驱动程序列表
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2024.9 μs * -93%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1051.8 μs *
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
996.5 μs * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
873.9 μs * +17%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
853.9 μs * +19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
698.6 μs * +34%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

在我们的评测机型中,申克为其配备了速度极快的三星 990 Pro,存储容量为 1 TB,Core 15 可以配备六家不同公司的固态硬盘,包括该制造商的各种型号。

根据所使用的测试软件(CrystalDiskMark 6、AS SSD、Disksdp),固态硬盘的性能有好有坏,但总的来说,990 Pro 仍是一款速度极快的 PCIe 4.0 NVMe 固态硬盘,在我们的评测机型上运行 Diskspd 循环时,它也表现出了非常稳定的高性能。

Crystaldiskmark 6
Crystaldiskmark 6
AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
AS SSD 复制
AS SSD 复制
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7112 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6886 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 437 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 423 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 61.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 100.1 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 390 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1334 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
92.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
86.6 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
85.7 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
72.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
71.8 pt
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
70.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
70.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
70 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4182 (4112.68min - 4181.96max) MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
3972 (3827.09min - 3972.22max) MB/s +17%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
3748 (1761.44min - 3748.03max) MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3645 (3579.03min - 3644.85max) MB/s +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=186, last 2 years)
3513 MB/s +4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3469 (3344.35min - 3469.11max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3390 (3342.47min - 3389.7max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2809 - 4234, n=13)
3332 MB/s -2%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3637 - 5842, n=13)
4842 MB/s +15%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4403 (1750.56min - 4402.76max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4342 (4320.81min - 4342.28max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
4251 (4012.48min - 4251.35max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4209 (4104.55min - 4209.16max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4064 (3527.07min - 4064.49max) MB/s -3%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3895 (3747.67min - 3894.8max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=186, last 2 years)
3781 MB/s -10%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (7011 - 7148, n=13)
7102 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7058 (5789.19min - 7057.97max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7011 (6063.46min - 7010.81max) MB/s -1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
6933 (6552.34min - 6933.16max) MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
6677 (5800.93min - 6677.12max) MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6651 (5971.64min - 6651.33max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=186, last 2 years)
6328 MB/s -10%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
5226 (4792.98min - 5226.07max) MB/s -26%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6898 (6891.45min - 6898.33max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6897 MB/s 0%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6898, n=13)
6791 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
5004 (4799.12min - 5003.59max) MB/s -27%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4952 (4919.08min - 4952.42max) MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=186, last 2 years)
4783 MB/s -31%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4536 (3842.06min - 4535.88max) MB/s -34%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
4392 (3922.93min - 4391.65max) MB/s -36%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.9 (83.66min - 83.86max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
78.5 (76.33min - 78.49max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 84.5, n=13)
73.9 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
71.8 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=186, last 2 years)
67.1 MB/s -15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
64.8 (63.71min - 64.77max) MB/s -17%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
62.1 (58.49min - 62.08max) MB/s -21%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
46.2 (45.32min - 46.24max) MB/s -41%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
290 (278.05min - 290.22max) MB/s +82%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
251 (249.24min - 250.87max) MB/s +58%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
246 (245.02min - 245.66max) MB/s +55%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
246 (236.18min - 245.56max) MB/s +55%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (146.3 - 343, n=13)
237 MB/s +49%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=186, last 2 years)
221 MB/s +39%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
200 (196.37min - 200.15max) MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
159.2 (158.4min - 159.24max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4915 (4860.82min - 4914.87max) MB/s +312%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4010 (4002.81min - 4009.85max) MB/s +236%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3330 (3310.23min - 3329.64max) MB/s +179%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4923, n=13)
3318 MB/s +178%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2852 (2785.11min - 2852.4max) MB/s +139%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
2620 (1053.51min - 2619.8max) MB/s +120%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=186, last 2 years)
2607 MB/s +119%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1192 (1160.39min - 1192.45max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3406 (3365.94min - 3405.88max) MB/s +597%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
2918 (2441.74min - 2917.63max) MB/s +497%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=13)
2678 MB/s +448%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2654 (2528.72min - 2653.61max) MB/s +443%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2646 (2422.02min - 2645.88max) MB/s +441%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2405 (937.07min - 2405.2max) MB/s +392%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=186, last 2 years)
2139 MB/s +337%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
489 (473.86min - 489.4max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9475 Points +43%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8677 Points +31%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10265, n=13)
8390 Points +27%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
7423 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=175, last 2 years)
6805 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6614 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
6430 Points -3%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
5239 Points -21%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3530 Points +88%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3242 Points +73%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3007 Points +61%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=13)
2993 Points +60%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2549 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=175, last 2 years)
2486 Points +33%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1873 Points
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1648 Points -12%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4145 Points +8%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4684, n=13)
4001 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3848 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3846 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=175, last 2 years)
3114 Points -19%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2919 Points -24%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
2751 Points -29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2602 Points -32%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5760.15 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5413 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5283 MB/s
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
5247.63 MB/s -1%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=13)
5191 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=175, last 2 years)
4923 MB/s -7%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4491 MB/s -15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
3333.37 MB/s -37%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5243.63 MB/s +44%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5612, n=13)
4757 MB/s +30%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
4617.83 MB/s +27%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4260 MB/s +17%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3979 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=175, last 2 years)
3666 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3646 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2633.33 MB/s -28%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.2 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
76.7 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (59.3 - 76.8, n=13)
70 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=175, last 2 years)
66 MB/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
63.85 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
59.24 MB/s -23%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
55.5 MB/s -28%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
51.41 MB/s -33%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
242.28 MB/s +41%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (172.3 - 306, n=13)
224 MB/s +30%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
218.1 MB/s +27%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
211 MB/s +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=175, last 2 years)
209 MB/s +21%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
194.6 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
172.3 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
165.94 MB/s -4%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2982.47 MB/s +135%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2619 MB/s +107%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2430.71 MB/s +92%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3164, n=13)
2339 MB/s +84%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2156.47 MB/s +70%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=175, last 2 years)
1922 MB/s +52%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1268 MB/s
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1143 MB/s -10%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3413.79 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3311 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 3975, n=13)
3311 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3253 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=175, last 2 years)
2541 MB/s -23%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2238.92 MB/s -32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2172.75 MB/s -34%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
2114 MB/s -36%
Access Time Read
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
0.137 ms * -315%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=174, last 2 years)
0.05413 ms * -64%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
0.053 ms * -61%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.05 ms * -52%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=13)
0.03731 ms * -13%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
0.035 ms * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.033 ms *
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * +36%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=175, last 2 years)
0.04719 ms * -105%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
0.024 ms * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.023 ms *
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=13)
0.02069 ms * +10%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms * +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.019 ms * +17%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
0.019 ms * +17%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
0.018 ms * +22%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7120 (6339.48-7142.87)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4118 (3284.7-6662.02)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5625 (4912.19-6954.3)
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2397 (880.89-5167.17)

图形卡

一个 Nvidia Geforce RTX 4060作为 GPU,不过,只需额外支付 200 美元,酷睿 15 还可配备 RTX 4070如 Fusion 15 中的那款。

在 3DMark 测试中,Core 15 的表现异常出色。在所有测试中,即使是配备了 RTX 4070 的 Fusion 也只有 8% 的优势,而酷睿 15 则紧随其后,排在基于 4060 的竞争对手前面,位列第二。

游戏性能并不像 3DMark 的结果那么好,但这完全与 CPU 密集型游戏有关,如《DOTA 2 Reborn》或《X-Plane》。抛开这些游戏不谈,在 CPU 密集型游戏方面,酷睿 15 与最好的 RTX 4060 比较设备不相上下。后者以 60fps 以上的速度运行全高清下的所有游戏,甚至在原生 QHD 分辨率下也没有出现任何问题,尽管《赛博朋克 2077》等游戏偶尔会低于 60fps 大关。

Witcher 3 图表显示,在游戏通常的昼夜节奏下,一个多小时的性能非常稳定。在这方面,其性能也与 RTX 4060 竞争产品处于同一水平。下表显示了与各种性能配置文件相关的分数,唯一不一致的是平衡模式。在最初的几分钟里,它显示出与发烧友模式相同的性能,帧率和耗电量随后短暂下降,仅能保持在电池模式下的水平。

在电池模式下,Fire Strike ,3D 性能下降了约 39%。

性能曲线/值 Witcher 3 FPS (开始 - 5 分钟后) GPU 速度 GPU 功耗 容量 消耗量
超频 103 - 101 2,720 MHz 108.5 W 50.96 dB 167 W
发烧级 97 - 92 2,640 MHz 102.7 49 dB 156 W
平衡型 97 - 65 1,880 MHz 47.86 W 最初为 39.75,几分钟后达到一致的 31 dB 最初为 154,然后为 67 W
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
100 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
92.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
92.2 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
86.7 pt
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
81.5 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024) -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
80.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
80.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
79.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44902 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=206, last 2 years)
42030 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
38912 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
37410 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
36220 Points -7%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
36185 Points -7%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
35045 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (28136 - 38912, n=42)
34554 Points -11%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
175780 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (81407 - 180228, n=25)
148035 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=126, last 2 years)
139808 Points -20%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
131829 Points -25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
122538 Points -30%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31274 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=213, last 2 years)
30316 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
29656 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
27474 Points -7%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
26952 Points -9%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
26844 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
26769 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (20533 - 29656, n=39)
25441 Points -14%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12682 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=209, last 2 years)
12505 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
11451 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
11267 Points -2%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
10680 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
10429 Points -9%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
9937 Points -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (7484 - 11451, n=41)
9860 Points -14%
3DMark 11 Performance
34005 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
69309 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
26988 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11597 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
24 Seconds * -26%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
24 Seconds * -26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (19 - 28, n=38)
23.1 Seconds * -22%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
23 Seconds * -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=183, last 2 years)
22.7 Seconds * -19%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
22 Seconds * -16%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
21 Seconds * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
19 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
49 Seconds * -26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
44 Seconds * -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (39 - 53, n=38)
43.6 Seconds * -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
41 Seconds * -5%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
41 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
39 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=190, last 2 years)
38.7 Seconds * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 Seconds * +18%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
312 Seconds * -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (189 - 452, n=38)
312 Seconds * -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=203, last 2 years)
310 Seconds * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
288 Seconds *
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
272 Seconds * +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
263 Seconds * +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX
247 Seconds * +14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
243 Seconds * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
96.5 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) -1!
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
85.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
84.1 pt
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
82 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
80 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
76.6 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
159.7 fps +43%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128 (110min) fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.1 - 216, n=203, last 2 years)
121.8 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
111.7 fps
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
108 fps -3%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
99.9 (85min) fps -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
97.2 (93min, 94P1) fps -13%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 (8.45min, 90.9P1) fps +18%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
120.2 (4.33min, 76.9P1) fps +3%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
117.4 (3.75min, 76.9P1) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
116.7 (5.3min, 76.9P1) fps
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
110.2 (8.03min, 76.9P1) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=191, last 2 years)
109.5 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
107.2 (3.65min, 71.4P1) fps -8%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
124.6 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 201, n=204, last 2 years)
114.9 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
107.2 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
106.3 fps -1%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
103.7 fps -3%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
98.1 fps -8%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=202, last 2 years)
217 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
214 (38.2min, 161.4P1) fps +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
210 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
204 (141.8min, 149.7P1) fps
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
194.9 (18.1min, 141.1P1) fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
183.3 (43.8min, 135P1) fps -10%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
179 (76.4min, 130.3P1) fps -12%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
182.1 (158.8min) fps +35%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
168.7 (146.8min) fps +25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
154.3 (130.7min) fps +14%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
149.7 (130.4min) fps +11%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
149 (130min) fps +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.2 - 220, n=211, last 2 years)
145.9 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
135.2 (117.4min) fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
136.9 fps +41%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
130.9 fps +35%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
114.9 fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
111 fps +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=217, last 2 years)
104.3 fps +7%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
100.3 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
97.2 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93.1 (78.7min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=55, last 2 years)
89.9 fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87 (55.2min) fps -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81.8 (19.5min) fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (56.7 - 93.1, n=16)
71.7 fps -23%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
69.8 (60.3min) fps -25%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67.1 (20.8min) fps -28%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (32.7 - 103.9, n=46, last 2 years)
66 fps +37%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
52.6 (39.5min) fps +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
49.7 (26.6min) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
48.2 (40.8min) fps
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
45.6 (38.6min) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (32.9 - 51.8, n=11)
44 fps -9%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.9 - 77.7, n=36, last 2 years)
49.9 fps +33%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43.8 (34.3min) fps +17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
37.4 (31.9min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (26.1 - 37.4, n=9)
32.3 fps -14%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
32 (24.5min) fps -14%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
166 (121min) fps +21%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
155 fps +13%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
141 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
137 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (23 - 232, n=109, last 2 years)
136.6 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (104 - 158, n=27)
130.9 fps -4%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
157 (109min) fps +23%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
147 fps +15%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
135 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
128 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (21 - 218, n=116, last 2 years)
127.9 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (95 - 148, n=28)
123.3 fps -4%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
124 (102min) fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 194, n=87, last 2 years)
115.8 fps +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
111 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
108 fps
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
105 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (71 - 111, n=21)
95 fps -12%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø101 (96-106)
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø97.2 (93-102)
HP Victus 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø96.1 (91-101)
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø105.6 (100-109)
low med. high ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 185 180.5 174.7 116.7 91.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 402.5 337.4 215.5 111.7 83.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 165.2 150.9 145.4 135.2 131.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 225 153.7 107.2 79.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 143.5 125.1 97.2 90.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 162 142 137 128 108
Strange Brigade (2018) 434 305 242 204 136.3
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 160.3 125.7 110.7 105.5 72.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 136.1 107.2 91 93.1 48.2
Skull & Bones (2024) 146 127 101 73 57

排放与能源--烫手山芋但经济实惠

噪音排放

在台式机上空闲运行时,风扇大多处于不活动状态。然而,哪怕是最轻微的日常负载,如打开浏览器上网,风扇也会被激活,然后以 27 分贝的低噪音嗡嗡作响。通常情况下,您需要处理的就是这种音量。

在重负载情况下,风扇音量会增加到 52 分贝,但当负载期结束后,风扇又会很快安静下来。但在相当长的一段时间内,即使是在空闲运行时,风扇也不会再次安静下来。

相比之下,惠普 Victus 和戴尔 G16 在游戏时的噪音要小一些,而随着Legion 5 的噪音越来越大,酷睿 15 的噪音介于这两款设备之间。

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 23 / 23 dB(A)
Load
38.92 / 52.09 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2026.224.826.22520.723.420.73122.128.222.1403016.530503722.1376325.923.825.98022.212.322.210025.919.725.912521.814.921.816024.51124.520026.316.526.325028.914.728.931531.712.431.740034.110.934.1500359.235630367.83680036.98.736.9100039.48.639.4125041.3941.3160042.79.842.7200043.110.143.1250041.31141.3315040.711.240.7400041.611.741.650004011.8406300381238800034.212.134.21000029.712.129.71250026.812.526.81600022.511.122.5SPL52.12352.1N7.90.47.9median 35median 11.2median 35Delta7.21.97.237.540.441.53939.441.438.938.337.632.630.131.528.330.229.227.129.428.531.928.126.828.728.126.926.525.326.83835.433.833.933.533.431.630.731.231.432.329.530.632.530.131.52928.632.729.731.330.430.831.830.829.626.334.127.626.222.227.326.125.324.823.329.728.727.725.526.425.425.823.72431.83128.124.927.128.122.522.322.431.930.828.121.725.722.621.119.520.633.833.130.521.828.923.92218.620.437.434.83424.331.826.223.120.723.736.435.933.522.130.322.921.617.22538.938.335.422.732.424.622.514.420.840.2383620.83223.721.911.619.539.438.835.519.431.222.820.19.919.143.440.137.42034.124.421.59.91944.242.139.72035.125.322.19.718.644.442.138.81935.624.622.19.8184441.638.618.834.924.5221017.444.6423919.335.424.521.810.31844.341.838.718.534.522.620.610.817.743.640.53717.13222.219.211.214.542.939.936.514.232.219.315.511.613.44542.33914.834.317.814.911.613.145.643.138.714.43216.613.81212.844.541.536.715.829.616.5131212.840.336.831.814.224.614.112.612.113.236.833.227.814.620.313.912.611.91332.128.122.714.216.513.21311.412.255.753.149.830.445.534.6322429.310.89.27.31.45.32.11.50.51.2median 40.3median 38.8median 36median 19.3median 32median 22.9median 21.5median 11.6median 185.24.64.73.34.13.63.534.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
Noise
-14%
-13%
3%
-18%
-9%
off / environment *
23
24
-4%
25
-9%
23
-0%
25
-9%
24
-4%
Idle Minimum *
23
24
-4%
28
-22%
23
-0%
27
-17%
24
-4%
Idle Average *
23
28.8
-25%
29
-26%
23
-0%
28
-22%
24
-4%
Idle Maximum *
23
32
-39%
33
-43%
27.96
-22%
33
-43%
24
-4%
Load Average *
38.92
45.5
-17%
45
-16%
27.96
28%
52
-34%
53.65
-38%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50.96
53.1
-4%
43
16%
47.89
6%
51
-0%
53.53
-5%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
52.06
Load Maximum *
52.09
55.7
-7%
48
8%
47.89
8%
53
-2%
53.65
-3%

* ... smaller is better

温度

酷睿 15 实际上并不凉爽,金属外壳发热量很大,成为额外的热源,尤其是在机身底部。掌托则相对凉爽。

即使在关闭风扇的情况下空闲运行,温度约为 35 °C,温度也相当高,但在合理范围内。玩游戏时,设备底部显示屏中央的热点温度高达 55°C,在压力测试中略高于 60°C。在这一区域,竞争产品的温度要低得多,即使是配备更强大 GPU 的 Fusion 15 也不例外。这也可能会对 RTX 4070 配置产生影响,导致可能的热节流。

Max. Load
 46 °C51 °C46 °C 
 47 °C52 °C47 °C 
 32 °C34 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 42.9 °C
49 °C61 °C49 °C
37 °C45 °C41 °C
31 °C35 °C34 °C
Maximum: 61 °C
Average: 42.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  57 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
Witcher 3 顶级
Witcher 3 顶级
Witcher 3 PSU
Witcher 3 PSU
Witcher 3 基础
Witcher 3 基础
压力测试顶部
压力测试顶部
PSU 压力测试
PSU 压力测试
压力测试基地
压力测试基地
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat
18%
21%
5%
16%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
52
40.4
22%
50
4%
49
6%
48
8%
50
4%
Maximum Bottom *
61
43.8
28%
50
18%
58
5%
56
8%
50
18%
Idle Upper Side *
35
30.3
13%
25
29%
35
-0%
28
20%
33
6%
Idle Bottom *
39
35.3
9%
26
33%
35
10%
29
26%
32
18%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

高音和中音线性均衡,但低音几乎听不到,扬声器的音量还可以再大一些。可通过 3.5 毫米耳机接口连接模拟音频设备。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.924.825.92524.123.424.13120.628.220.6402616.5265029.822.129.86327.823.827.88018.112.318.110025.719.725.712531.514.931.516047114720058.316.558.325065.914.765.93156812.46840067.510.967.5500739.27363072.77.872.7800688.768100066.68.666.6125069.1969.1160068.69.868.6200065.610.165.6250063.81163.8315066.211.266.2400064.111.764.1500063.411.863.4630064.41264.4800062.912.162.91000062.112.162.11250063.412.563.41600058.611.158.6SPL79.12379.1N47.90.447.9median 64.4median 11.2median 64.4Delta4.61.94.626.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.12 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

PSU 变小了不少
PSU 变小了不少

酷睿 15 比竞争对手略微经济一些,尤其是在空闲运行时--这一切都非常好。游戏时的功耗也保持适中。

在压力测试中,我们暂时测得的消耗值高达 286 W,理论上可能会让 240 W 的 PSU 不堪重负。不过,这些负载峰值实际上只是暂时的。在游戏过程中,我们测得的平均耗电量仅为 167 W,而这正是 PSU 能够始终承受的。

说到 PSU,申克似乎在缩小尺寸方面做了改进。制造商不再使用笨重的 240 瓦 Chicony PSU,而是采用了 240 瓦的设备,但外形尺寸却小了很多。这对移动性非常有利。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 5.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9.3 / 12.9 / 12.8 Watt
Load midlight / 286 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.30
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Victus 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.30
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-36%
-13%
-13%
-20%
-100%
-26%
-48%
Idle Minimum *
9.3
15.4
-66%
9
3%
11
-18%
8
14%
21.6
-132%
12.5 ?(3 - 33, n=37)
-34%
Idle Average *
12.9
19.7
-53%
15
-16%
14.8
-15%
14
-9%
29
-125%
16.6 ?(6.9 - 35, n=37)
-29%
Idle Maximum *
12.8
20.7
-62%
23
-80%
16.8
-31%
26
-103%
42.7
-234%
21.2 ?(7.6 - 45, n=37)
-66%
Witcher 3 ultra *
167
191.3
-15%
143.7
14%
185
-11%
192.7
-15%
189
-13%
Load Maximum *
286
246.6
14%
241
16%
255
11%
244
15%
269
6%
215 ?(99 - 364, n=37)
25%
Load Average *
102.6
123
103.7
118
190

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø167 (157.56-189.18)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø201 (136.84-285.87)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.8 (6.0221-29.196)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø147.2 (141.63-157.1)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø144.2 (134.74-147.95)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø135.5 (70.23-154.3)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø172.9 (162.14-186.55)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø155.5 (148.2-160.29)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø14.4 (11.906-18.002)

电池寿命

作为标准配置,申克安装了一块 80 Wh 的电池。不过,只需额外支付约 70 美元,该设备就可以配置更大的 99.8 Wh 电池,也就是我们评测机型上的电池。

在降低亮度为 150 尼特的情况下,酷睿 15 可在 Wi-Fi 或视频测试中持续工作约 7 小时。如果把亮度调到最大,在 Wi-Fi 测试中不到 5 小时就会熄灭。总体而言,我们的电池续航时间非常不错,尽管Legion 的 80 Wh 电池似乎也能提供类似的性能。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 00min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
4h 52min
Blu-ray
0h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 31min
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24)
R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
HP Victus 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060
i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-13%
22%
-26%
18%
-21%
-23%
H.264
457
576
26%
381
-17%
602
32%
WiFi v1.3
420
444
6%
511
22%
378
-10%
480
14%
343.1
-18%
Load
151
46
-70%
76
-50%
164
9%
115
-24%
Reader / Idle
911

Pros

+ 优质、时尚的金属外壳
+ 明亮、色彩准确的 sRGB 显示屏
+ 2 个固态硬盘和 2 个内存插槽
+ 电力传输

Cons

- 无 Thunderbolt
- SD读卡器速度慢
- 负载时发热

结论 - 性能良好,价格实惠,冷却效果可能会有所改善

XMG Core 15 M24,由全球货运公司提供
XMG Core 15 M24,由全球货运公司提供

Core 15 的价格至少比 Fusion 15 便宜 200 美元。但代价是,它不能使用 Thunderbolt 技术和更强大的 CPU。后者导致 CPU 性能明显下降近 20%。不过,在大多数 3D 游戏中,你并不会真正注意到这一点。Fusion 在这方面可能会快 20%,但这要归功于它的 RTX 4070。RTX 4060 变体应该也能达到同样的速度。

我们喜欢 Core 的金属外壳工艺,以及在内存和固态硬盘方面良好的可扩展性选择。键盘、3D 性能和电池续航时间也很不错。

唯一的 "诟病 "是底座的金属表面在重负载时会产生大量热量。在这方面,制造商今后应加以改进,并优化散热系统。

XMG Core 15 是一款功能强大的 3D 游戏机,具有良好的制造质量,其中包括在负载情况下温度略高的金属外壳。

去年的 XMG Pro 15 是值得一看的替代产品。去年的 HX CPU 仍然比这里的 AMD 处理器更快,而且 Pro 还配备了 Thunderbolt 4。Legion 5i 也是一个不错的选择,尤其是价格更低的 Campuspoint 版本。

价格和供应情况

Schenker 商店在德国,酷睿 15 的起价约为 1,500 美元(当前汇率)。由于配备了更大的电池、Wi-Fi 6E、更多内存和三星 990 Pro 固态硬盘,我们的评测机型价格约为 1700 美元。相比之下,Fusion 15 的起价约为 1600 美元。

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) - 06/19/2024 v8 (new)
Christian Hintze

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
64 / 80 → 80%
Weight
63 / 10-68 → 91%
Battery
71 / 95 → 75%
Display
87%
Games Performance
87%
Application Performance
87%
AI Performance
96%
Temperature
80 / 95 → 84%
Noise
75 / 90 → 84%
Audio
73%
Camera
36 / 75 → 48%
Average
61%
83%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
71.1%
Repairability
55%
Software Updates
Total Sustainability Score: 0%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测:来自德国的高级金属外壳游戏机
Christian Hintze, 2024-06-20 (Update: 2024-06-20)