联想Legion 5 Pro 7代笔记本电脑评测。Ryzen 7 6800H或Ryzen 9 6900HX?
Legion 5 Pro第7代是一款中上等的游戏笔记本电脑,紧跟在更昂贵的 Legion 7 16系列.它加入了越来越常见的16英寸游戏笔记本电脑阵容,如 HP Omen 16, 华硕ROG Zephyrus M16, 戴尔G16, 或 Gigabyte Aero 16所有这些都是审查中的联想模型的替代品。
我们的测试设备配备了AMD Zen 3+ Ryzen 7 6800H CPU,150 W TGPGeForce RTX 3070 Ti显卡,价格约为1900美元。其他SKU有Ryzen 9 6900HX、RTX 3070、RTX 3060或RTX 3050 Ti,但所有选项都有相同的16:10 2560 x 1600 IPS显示屏,支持G-Sync。
2022年的Legion 5 Pro第7代与去年的模型共享相同的机箱设计,因此我们建议查看我们的 2021年型号的现有评论以了解有关该设备物理特性的更多信息。相比之下,老版本采用了较慢的Zen 3 Ryzen 7 5800H和140 W TGPGeForce RTX 3070处理器。
更多联想评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.6 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 27 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 20 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | 2.6 kg | 19.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | HP Victus 16-e0145ng R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
86.1 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 铝制外盖和底部底座
有一个简单的方法可以区分2022年的Legion 5 Pro 16和2021年的Legion 5 Pro 16。2022年的机型沿左边缘多了一个USB-C接口,总共有三个,而2021年的机型只有两个。同时,USB-A端口的数量从四个下降到三个。这两个型号在其他方面是相同的。
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
网络摄像头
网络摄像头仍然只有720p,没有红外。
维护
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件之外,盒子里没有任何额外的东西。如果在美国购买,则适用标准的一年有限制造商保修。
显示 - 只有一个选项
联想对京东方CQ NE160QDM-NY1 IPS面板与去年的Legion 5 Pro 16型号没有任何改变。我们在下面的测量结果显示了类似的属性,包括全sRGB覆盖,快速的黑白响应时间,~1000:1的对比度,和明亮的500尼特背光。
然而,我们的具体设备存在中等程度的背光渗漏,如下图所示。大多数IPS面板都会出现一些不均匀的光渗,但这种强度在像Legion 5 Pro 16这样的高端游戏机上看到特别令人不安。
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 522.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 1275:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.61
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H BOE CCQ_NE160QDM_NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H AU Optronics AUOC199, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Victus 16-e0145ng CMN1609, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Dell G16 7620 BOE NE16QDM, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | -4% | -37% | 1% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 67.3 | 68.53 2% | 63.7 -5% | 41.6 -38% | 68.3 1% | |
sRGB Coverage | 96.1 | 98.38 2% | 95.3 -1% | 61.9 -36% | 98 2% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.5 | 70.45 1% | 65.7 -5% | 43 -38% | 70.5 1% | |
Response Times | 25% | 57% | 25% | -90% | 24% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14.4 ? | 14 ? 3% | 4.8 ? 67% | 9.2 ? 36% | 29.6 ? -106% | 8.6 ? 40% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 6 ? 46% | 6 ? 46% | 9.6 ? 14% | 19.4 ? -73% | 10.4 ? 7% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -7% | -51% | -19% | -127% | -10% | |
Brightness middle | 522.8 | 515 -1% | 448 -14% | 478.8 -8% | 257 -51% | 369.4 -29% |
Brightness | 503 | 475 -6% | 446 -11% | 477 -5% | 239 -52% | 348 -31% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 85 1% | 86 2% | 90 7% | 88 5% | 83 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.45 -10% | 0.48 -17% | 0.43 -5% | 0.25 39% | 0.32 22% |
Contrast | 1275 | 1144 -10% | 933 -27% | 1113 -13% | 1028 -19% | 1154 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.47 | 2.38 4% | 2.76 -12% | 2.24 9% | 6.91 -180% | 1.78 28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.56 | 4.37 33% | 7.09 -8% | 4.49 32% | 22.27 -239% | 4.41 33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.61 | 1.1 -80% | 2.86 -369% | 1.89 -210% | 3.61 -492% | 1.22 -100% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 2.71 10% | 3.1 -3% | 2.3 23% | 7.5 -150% | 3.2 -7% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.49 88% | 2.153 102% | 2.25 98% | 2.125 104% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6719 97% | 6117 106% | 6826 95% | 6955 93% | 6025 108% | 6750 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 87 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
-0% | 3% /
-31% | 1% /
-9% | -85% /
-102% | 5% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
在我们的特定设备上,该显示器预先校准了平均灰度和色彩deltaE值,分别为3和2.47。用X-Rite色度计自行校准面板将进一步提高deltaE值,仅为0.7和0.6。我们建议应用我们上述校准过的ICM配置文件,以更好地利用显示器的全部sRGB覆盖。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 6.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 稍微快一点
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过Windows和联想Vantage软件将我们的设备设置为性能模式。我们还确保将GPU超频和GPU工作模式切换为 "仅限dGPU",以获得最大性能。用户绝对应该熟悉Vantage软件及其各种设置,下面的截图就是一个例子。
处理器
单线程和多线程性能比上一代产品快约10%和20%。 Ryzen 7 5800H的性能,根据我们使用 惠普Omen 16和2021年的联想Legion 5 Pro 16。虽然不是不重要,但同比的性能提升并不像从第11代到第12代英特尔的跳跃那样大。这款 酷睿i7-12700H例如,仍然比我们的Ryzen 7 6800H快大约15%到30%。
升级到 Ryzen 9 6900HX从我们的 7 6800H预计最多只能带来微弱的收益,正如我们下面的对比图所示。因此,有预算意识的买家可能想考虑用更便宜的Ryzen 7 6800H SKU代替。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (14.9 - 18.5, n=9) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H -9! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (12876 - 17031, n=8) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (82673 - 105987, n=8) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (2886 - 3634, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (75117 - 106322, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (11771 - 13120, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (45287 - 58327, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (67816 - 137383, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (732 - 901, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (6917 - 8980, n=8) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (26496 - 30360, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
系统性能
PCMark的结果是在其他基于英特尔的高端游戏笔记本电脑的个位数百分比之内,如戴尔G16 7620即使Ryzen 7 6800H不能跟上最新的12代酷睿CPU。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (6783 - 7549, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10343 - 10472, n=2) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (8991 - 9479, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9108 - 11759, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1522 - 1643, n=2) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1530 - 1600, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1589 - 1746, n=2) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1316 - 1481, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 |
PCMark 10 Score | 7549 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (48209 - 51186, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (43828 - 51778, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (51116 - 55307, n=8) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (83.1 - 104.1, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时,存在轻微的DPC问题。在60 FPS的情况下,4K视频播放是完美的,没有掉帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 多达两个PCIe4 NVMe固态硬盘
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 150W图形
图形性能非常好,3DMark结果比我们数据库中具有相同功能的平均笔记本电脑快近15%。 GeForce RTX 3070 TiGPU。事实上,它甚至超过了 RTX 3080 Ti中的 笔记本电脑中的RTX 3080 Ti。.
如果关闭Turbo模式,性能只下降了约5%。因此,如果用户想以最快速度运行笔记本电脑,必须记得通过联想Vantage启用涡轮模式。
降级到低端的 RTX 3070或 RTX 3060根据我们使用多台RTX 3070或3060笔记本电脑的经验,SKU的性能将分别下降约10%和30%。
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22612 - 32550, n=37) | |
Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (8142 - 12324, n=37) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Score | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7369 - 12239, n=37) | |
Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (13799 - 42569, n=36) | |
Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 32025 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 64746 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 27014 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11758 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
X-Plane 11.11 | |
1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (68.8 - 166.8, n=36) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (57.3 - 145.7, n=36) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (51.6 - 116.9, n=37) | |
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 181.5 | 176.5 | 167.6 | 104 | 98.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 370.5 | 308.8 | 226 | 117 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 150.4 | 138 | 132.2 | 126.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 187.2 | 156 | 115.6 | 90.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 119.6 | 103.6 | 83.9 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 383 | 298 | 248 | 217 | 160.5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 148.9 | 130.2 | 102.1 | 86 | 54.4 |
排放--相当嘈杂
系统噪音
风扇噪音行为与电源配置文件设置有关。例如,在禁用独立GPU的省电模式下,系统会在23.5分贝(A)的安静背景下保持安静。不幸的是,轻微的多任务处理或视频流足以将噪音提高到更可听的32分贝(A),就像我们在去年的模型上观察到的那样。
即使禁用涡轮增压模式,游戏也会引起近55 dB(A)的风扇噪音。因此,你不妨在游戏时启用Turbo模式,因为它似乎不会使系统更响亮或更安静。50dB(A)的范围比我们在惠普Victus 16上记录的要大。 惠普Victus 16或戴尔G16在类似条件下的噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.7 / 31.1 / 32.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38.4 / 54.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.5 dB(A) |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | HP Victus 16-e0145ng GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell G16 7620 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 512GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -9% | 13% | -2% | 6% | |
off / environment * | 23.5 | 24.6 -5% | 25 -6% | 22.8 3% | 26 -11% | 23.2 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.7 | 28.7 -21% | 25 -5% | 23 3% | 26 -10% | 28.3 -19% |
Idle Average * | 31.1 | 32 -3% | 31 -0% | 23 26% | 28 10% | 28.8 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 32.2 | 32 1% | 42 -30% | 23 29% | 34 -6% | 28.9 10% |
Load Average * | 38.4 | 45.2 -18% | 48 -25% | 26.8 30% | 44 -15% | 32.4 16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.8 | 52 5% | 54.3 1% | 48 12% | 48.3 12% | |
Load Maximum * | 54.8 | 54.4 1% | 56 -2% | 54.2 1% | 53 3% | 48.1 12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
平均表面温度比华硕ROG Zephyrus M16要低得多,尽管它们的热点相似。例如,联想和华硕的最热点可分别达到53摄氏度,但联想的掌托和键盘区域仍然明显较冷,因此在上面玩游戏更舒适。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | HP Victus 16-e0145ng AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -7% | -19% | 5% | -12% | 9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.8 | 45.8 -5% | 52 -19% | 37.2 15% | 54 -23% | 47.6 -9% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 66.3 -25% | 53 -0% | 43 19% | 47 11% | 54 -2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 30.4 -1% | 38 -27% | 34 -13% | 41 -37% | 23 23% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.8 | 30.4 4% | 41 -29% | 32.8 -3% | 31 3% | 24.6 23% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在Prime95压力下,CPU会无限期地提升到4.2GHz和90W,不需要节流。不幸的是,核心温度将变得非常热,略低于95摄氏度,这比大多数其他游戏笔记本的温度要高。
当运行 Witcher 3激活Turbo模式时,Nvidia GPU将稳定在1620 MHz核心、1800 MHz内存和136 W功耗的水平。有趣的是,在禁用Turbo模式的情况下重复这项测试,将导致核心和内存时钟分别为1605 MHz和1750 MHz,但主板功耗却高达149 W。你还是想启用Turbo模式,因为图形性能仍然比禁用Turbo模式时稍快。
用电池供电运行限制了性能。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为20957和13153分,而在主电源上则为27288和31289分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 44 | 44 |
Prime95压力 | 4.1 | -- | 93 | 59 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 3.3 | 1005 | 89 | 87 |
Witcher 3 应力(涡轮开启) | ~2.3 | 1620 | 86 | 87 |
Witcher 3 应力(涡轮关闭) | ~2.3 | 1605 | 85 | 86 |
发言人
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--有需求的机器
消耗功率
虽然Ryzen 7 6800H比Core i7-12700H慢了大约25%,但它不一定比Core i7-12700H更省电。事实上,AMD和英特尔版本的Legion 5 Pro 16在运行Prime95时,每个系统的功耗约为160W。在运行Prime95时,它们之间的功耗也保持相当相似。 Witcher 3.
当CPU和GPU都处于100%的利用率时,我们能够从大型(约19.9 x 9.8 x 2.6厘米)300 W交流适配器中记录到275 W的临时最大功耗。该系统可以以合理的速度充电,并同时运行苛刻的负载。
Off / Standby | 0.06 / 2.4 Watt |
Idle | 9.7 / 14.8 / 45.8 Watt |
Load |
87.2 / 275.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Victus 16-e0145ng R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 512GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -50% | 2% | -5% | 33% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.7 | 22.8 -135% | 11 -13% | 9.9 -2% | 7 28% | 14.4 -48% |
Idle Average * | 14.8 | 26.5 -79% | 20 -35% | 22 -49% | 9 39% | 17.8 -20% |
Idle Maximum * | 45.8 | 41 10% | 30 34% | 23.1 50% | 15 67% | 31.5 31% |
Load Average * | 87.2 | 191 -119% | 111 -27% | 94.4 -8% | 93 -7% | 101.2 -16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 209 | 194.7 7% | 156 25% | 249 -19% | 134.5 36% | 176.9 15% |
Load Maximum * | 275.3 | 238 14% | 197 28% | 276 -0% | 185 33% | 242.9 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命 - 不算太差
Legion 5 Pro 16的英特尔版本在设置为平衡电源配置文件并激活iGPU时,WLAN的运行时间几乎比它长一个小时。电池寿命的改善可能是由于AMD CPU在运行较少的负载时效率更高,如我们上面的功耗部分所示。尽管如此,它仍然相对较短,只有不到4.5小时,而华硕ROG Zephyrus M16几乎是8小时。
启用快速充电功能后,从空电到满电只需要不到一个小时。其他大多数笔记本电脑需要1.5至2小时。
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 99 Wh | HP Victus 16-e0145ng R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -19% | 75% | 65% | 61% | 13% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 264 | 214 -19% | 463 75% | 436 65% | 424 61% | 297 13% |
H.264 | 246 | |||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 126 | |||||
Load | 36 | 97 | 110 | 43 | ||
Reader / Idle | 799 | 293 | 426 |
Pros
Cons
结论--只是稍微快了一点
Ryzen 7 6800H和150 WGeForce RTX 3070 Ti比去年的Legion 5 Pro上的Ryzen 7 5800H和140 WGeForce RTX 3070各快约10%。因此,2022年的更新仅仅是在2021年的基础上进行了小幅升级,没有重大的外部或内部变化。
如果你已经拥有2021年的联想Legion 5 Pro 16,那么跳过2022年的版本,你不会错过什么。联想可能会在未来一到两年内全面更新该系列,进行更多重大改进。
目前,与Legion 5 Pro 16最接近的替代品是 戴尔G16和 华硕ROG Zephyrus M16两者都有类似的165赫兹刷新率和H系列CPU选项。华硕的型号明显更小、更轻,但它的运行温度更高,声音也同样大。同时,戴尔的型号运行起来更安静,但其尺寸和核心温度比已经很热很重的联想略高,也更重。
对于未来的改版,我们希望看到更冷的核心温度和更直接的控制性能的软件。在当前版本的Vantage,用户必须单独启用四个独立的设置(MUX、GPU超频、Vantage性能和Windows性能模式),以充分发挥笔记本电脑的功率,这在不同功率模式之间切换时可能会很烦人。
价格和可用性
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
- 10/29/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo