Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090评论：酷睿i9-13950HX巨兽，全球首款双模迷你LED UHD+显示屏

Name: Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
Brand: Razer

令人流口水的蛇。

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023是为对旗舰型16:10 16英寸游戏笔记本电脑感兴趣的玩家提供的新产品。刀锋16配备了桌面级的英特尔猛禽湖-HX酷睿i9-13950HX，175瓦的英伟达GeForce RTX 4090笔记本GPU，以及世界上第一个双模式迷你LED显示屏，它试图在今年挑战一些最强大的巨无霸。我们探讨雷蛇对Blade 16的野心，看看它是否值得比Blade 16 RTX 4080多出700美元。

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 👁 Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/23/2023 🇺🇸 🇸🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Intel Raptor Lake Gaming Geforce

新的雷蛇刀片16越来越多的猛禽湖-HX和RTX 40系列游戏笔记本电脑加入了这个名单，这些笔记本电脑除了厨房水槽之外，什么都有，而且价格和一辆二手车一样高。

我们的测试样品由Nvidia印度公司提供，采用的是酷睿i9-13950HX, RTX 4090笔记本GPU, 16英寸双模迷你LED UHD显示屏，32GB DDR5-5600内存，2x 1TB NVMe SSD，以及95.2WHr电池。Razer不在印度销售其产品，但这一配置将使你花费4,300美元或5,000欧元。

我们以前曾审查过Razer Blade 16 Early 2023由英特尔酷睿i9-13950HX和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU和另一款刀片18采用相同的CPU和RTX 4070笔记本GPU.

在这篇评论中，我们测试了RTX 4090笔记本GPU变体的Blade 16 Early 2023，将其与今年的最新设备进行比较，并看看在已经相当大的配置上再花700美元是否有真正的好处。

机箱、输入设备和其他内部设备与RTX 4080版本的Blade 16相同，所以我们在这里只简单地谈一下。

Razer Blade 16 SKU和配置。酷睿i9-13950HX是所有2023年刀锋的共同配置。

Test device courtesy of Razer

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade 16 RZ09-0483 (Blade 16 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13950HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.5 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 110 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, 175 W TDP, GDDR6, Game Ready Driver 531.29, Advanced Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600 Quad-Channel, Timings: 46-45-45-89

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, No, AUO B160ZAN01.U, mini-LED, Dual Refresh Rate: UHD+ 120 Hz / FHD+ 240 Hz, , glossy: no, HDR, 120 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Storage

SSSTC CA6-8D1024, 1024 GB

, 2x 1 TB SSD, 865 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio jack, Card Reader: UHS-II SD Card Reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 21.99 x 355 x 244

Battery

95.2 Wh, 6182 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: FHD, IR
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 4-speaker array (2x tweeters, 2x woofers). THX Spatial Audio, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Razer Synapse, Razer Cortex, Razer Axon, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.45 kg, Power Supply: 959 g

Price

5000 EUR

Links

Razer homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.8 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	21.99 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
89.9 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	27 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
88 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	29.7 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.5 kg	23 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	30.8 mm	18.00"	2560x1600
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	22.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	30.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
91.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	21.99 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	26 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
91.4 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3 kg	21.9 mm	18.00"	2560x1600

外壳：真正的Razer风格的高级和坚固的外壳

刀片16采用阳极氧化铝处理，让人联想到MacBook Pro，与我们之前测试过的大量Razers类似。优质的机箱感觉非常坚固，弯曲度非常小，也只有在故意施加大量压力的情况下才会如此。

雷蛇Blade 16比华硕ROG Zephyrus更纤细。华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16而且绝对比联想Legion Pro 7和 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI.这款华硕ROG Zephyrus M16在整体尺寸方面几乎与Blade 16 Early 2023相同。

机箱采用了简约的设计，唯一的照明效果是盖子背面特有的雷蛇标志。然而，这个盖子是一块污垢和指纹磁铁，要保持它的清洁是很烦人的。用一根手指打开盖子很容易，没有稳定性问题。

连接性：高通量SD卡和Wi-Fi

刀片16提供了一个足够的端口选择。Razer使用一个专有的充电端口，向后兼容去年的刀片15和刀锋17.连接器没有与机箱平齐，这可能是一些人的不满。

两个USB Type-C端口的功率输出都可以达到100W。说到Type-C，Blade 16只提供一个Thunderbolt 4，另一个是USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C。

雷蛇本可以为Blade 16配备两个Thunderbolt 4端口的。另外，Type-C端口没有标记，所以你必须注意Thunderbolt 4实际上是在右边的那个，而不是左边的那个。

一个Kensington锁插槽是存在的。然而，没有RJ-45千兆以太网端口是一个遗憾，因为这台笔记本电脑并不完全渴望瘦小。

左侧：专有电源端口，2个USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A，USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C，3.5毫米组合音频插孔

右边：UHS-II SD读卡器、Thunderbolt 4、USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A、HDMI 2.1输出、Kensington锁

SD卡阅读器

雷蛇继续在游戏笔记本中使用一些最快的SD读卡器，而Blade 16也不例外。尽管Blade 16 Early 2023的读卡器在顺序测试中落后于华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16，但在JPG文件复制测试中，它能够寸步不让地超越后者。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	202 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelbird AV PRO 128 GB V60)	188.2 (162.9^min - 196.43^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	185.7 (176.29^min - 198.35^max) MB/s -1%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	182 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	125 MB/s -34%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s -49%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	83.5 MB/s -56%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	77.2 MB/s -59%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	269 MB/s +33%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	207.8 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	207.6 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelbird AV PRO 128 GB V60)	203.01 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	191.89 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s -41%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	89.9 MB/s -56%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	86.2 MB/s -58%

沟通

刀片16配备了一个英特尔Wi-Fi 6E AX211无线局域网模块。使用我们参考的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器对Wi-Fi性能进行了测试，距离笔记本电脑1米，视线清晰，没有其他连接设备或外部干扰。

网络性能在5GHz和6GHz频段都相当稳定。使用6GHz频段比5GHz频段没有真正的吞吐量优势，因为两者的传输速率基本相同。

也就是说，如果你有一个兼容的路由器，并希望减少来自其他大量5GHz客户端的干扰，6GHz选项仍然是一个不错的选择。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1635 (1528^min - 1715^max) MBit/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1582 (1517^min, 1518.74^P1 - 1636^max) MBit/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1579 (848^min - 1696^max) MBit/s -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1545 (1189^min - 1625^max) MBit/s -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1466 (748^min - 1542^max) MBit/s -10%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1295 (1034^min - 1383^max) MBit/s -21%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s -24%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=238)	1233 MBit/s -25%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1196 (618^min - 1298^max) MBit/s -27%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1155 (495^min - 1441^max) MBit/s -29%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1890 (1843^min - 1936^max) MBit/s +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1733 (1700^min - 1761^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1619 (1537^min - 1665^max) MBit/s -7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1557 (795^min - 1691^max) MBit/s -10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1545 (1508^min, 1510.9^P1 - 1569^max) MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s -20%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=238)	1379 MBit/s -20%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1362 (1249^min - 1437^max) MBit/s -21%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1328 (1093^min - 1448^max) MBit/s -23%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1225 (1116^min - 1351^max) MBit/s -29%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W MediaTek RZ616	1767 (1634^min, 1649.37^P1 - 1855^max) MBit/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1632 (1509^min - 1662^max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1615 (840^min - 1682^max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=72, last 2 years)	1425 MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=212)	1372 MBit/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1371 (1036^min - 1505^max) MBit/s -16%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1230 (1091^min - 1327^max) MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1751 (1679^min - 1777^max) MBit/s
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W MediaTek RZ616	1738 (1633^min, 1638.51^P1 - 1768^max) MBit/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1645 (1614^min - 1670^max) MBit/s -6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1516 (769^min - 1565^max) MBit/s -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1494 (1283^min - 1580^max) MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=211)	1493 MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=72, last 2 years)	1482 MBit/s -15%

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1632 (1509-1662)

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1767 (1634-1855)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1750 (1679-1777)

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1738 (1633-1768)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (1528-1715)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1700-1761)

网络摄像头

1080p网络摄像头显示出较高的色彩偏差，特别是在蓝色阴影下。锐度是可以接受的，但有可感知的噪音。总的来说，该输出是体面的，足够用于视频通话和工作。

ColorChecker Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090: 14.25 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 21.01 ∆E

安全问题

刀片16支持通过红外传感器进行基于Windows Hello的登录。面部识别速度很快，工作起来没有什么问题。与Blade 18不同的是，为网络摄像头提供了一个物理快门。存在一个TPM 2.0模块。

维护

卸下八个T5螺丝，就可以打开底板，露出巨大的蒸汽室冷却系统。如果需要的话，DDR5-5600内存、NVMe固态硬盘和Wi-Fi卡可以被换掉。双电池组也可以被拧开并更换。

这里需要注意的一点是，Razer只在其支持网站上提供BIOS和固件更新。.在大多数情况下，来自英特尔和Nvidia的官方通用驱动用于WLAN和图形，工作起来没有问题。

但是，如果你因为某些原因必须清除或更换整个驱动器，请确保事先有一份工厂恢复镜像的副本。事先准备好。下载恢复镜像需要用Razer账户登录并输入设备的序列号。

配件和保修

我们的Blade 16装置带有一个330W的GaN电源适配器和通常的文书工作作为标准。

Razer为Blade 16提供了一年的标准保修，为电池提供了两年的保修。可以单独购买另外一年的延长保修，但这不适用于电池。

输入设备：与早期的刀片没有太大区别

键盘

Razer在键盘上采用了传统的薄膜按键开关。键是平的，有很好的驱动力和触感，但提供一个短的1毫米行程距离。键盘支持Razer Chroma RGB效果和N键翻转。背光强度可在15个步骤中调节。

居中的定位将吸引那些不介意没有数字键盘的人。然而，习惯于较长的右Shift键和较短的上下方向键会显得很麻烦。

刀片16的键盘不能与微星Titan GT77或Schenker XMG Neo 17M等相提并论。申克XMG Neo 17 M22提供机械开关。虽然Razer的实现在大多数情况下是很好的，但在这个键盘上输入长篇文件确实感觉有点吃力。

触摸板

宽敞的9.5厘米x17厘米的玻璃触摸板是2023年刀片的新产品，有一个大的滑行区域，支持WindowsPrecision 手势。整个表面是可点击的，反应灵敏，但触觉感觉有些模糊。

显示：明亮、接近OLED质量的双模式迷你LED，具有高PWM功能

Blade 16 Early 2023提供了一个首创的双模式迷你LED显示屏。我们的测试装置在测试过程中提出了几个耐人寻味的见解。

我们的设备的AUO面板最初遭受了一个图像保留的错误，它将墙纸的一部分永久地刻在显示屏上（除了关闭时），这是一个令人讨厌的体验。然而，Razer现在已经，发布了一个固件补丁，完全解决了这个问题。

Blade 16 Early 2023是首款提供16:10双模式显示选项的笔记本电脑。用户可以在UHD+（3840 x 2400）120赫兹和FHD+（1920 x 1200）240赫兹原生面板模式之间转换，这是一个完美的整数缩放。更高的分辨率可以帮助创造性的工作流程，而240赫兹的FHD+在竞争性游戏中也很方便。

雷蛇没有说明调光区的确切数量，但我们预计它们将超过1000个，与微星Titan GT77 HX 13VI类似。支持Nvidia G-Sync，但只在dGPU模式下。

显示模式可以通过Razer Synapse（需要重新启动）或从BIOS改变。在这里，我们遇到了几个特殊情况中的第一个。如果你在BIOS中把分辨率改为FHD+，你就不能从UEFI界面改回UHD+。相反，你将不得不依靠Synapse来切换到UHD+。这一点没有详细说明，可能会使第一次使用的人感到困惑。

我们在UHD+ 120 Hz模式下进行了所有测试，因为对于任何在笔记本电脑上花费超过四千美元的人来说，这是合理的选择。

近距离观看时，子像素矩阵看起来有些颗粒感。有趣的是，我们看到UHD+模式下的矩阵看起来相当清晰和明确。人们期望在切换到FHD+模式时有更大的像素尺寸，但我们在这里看到相同大小的像素。

我们还可以看到子像素矩阵的模糊性和混叠伪影--它不像UHD+模式那样锐利，与原生FHD面板相比也绝对不那么锐利。似乎Razer只是简单地缩小了4K分辨率并使用了时间抖动。

在玩快节奏的射击游戏时，这可能不会构成太大的问题，但我们建议在大多数情况下坚持使用原生UHD+分辨率。在高曝光下没有观察到背光渗漏。

2023年Razer Blade 16的面板被官方评为提供1000尼特的峰值亮度。我们观察到94%的优秀亮度分布，在SDR模式下的峰值为752尼特。

由于某些原因，只有在使用默认的Windows色彩配置文件时才能获得这些数值，这也是我们下面测量的基础。刀锋16在出厂时已进行了校准，但使用这种ICC配置文件会使亮度水平下降100尼特。

我们在HDR模式下测量到接近1110尼特，100%的白色图像。这并不完全是 Apple MacBook Pro 16水平，但仍然是一个优秀的亮度，尽管如此。

除了一个工厂校准的ICC文件外，没有预设的颜色配置文件。在UHD+模式下，用户可以直接从Windows显示设置或Razer Synapse选择所需的配置文件。然而，这些选项在FHD+模式下是不可用的。


746 cd/m²	743 cd/m²	705 cd/m²
728 cd/m²	730 cd/m²	709 cd/m²
752 cd/m²	729 cd/m²	717 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO B160ZAN01.U tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3

Maximum: 752 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 728.8 cd/m² Minimum: 5.17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 723 cd/m²
Contrast: 162222:1 (Black: 0.0045 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.85
ΔE Greyscale 8.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.98

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3)

	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 AUO B160ZAN01.U, mini-LED, 3840x2400, 16"	Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NE160QDM-NM4, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18"
Display		-0%	-1%	-3%	-18%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9	99.4 -1%	94.9 -5%	97 -3%	69.1 -31%	96.9 -3%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	99.9 0%	99.9 0%	99.7 0%	99.8 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	90.9	90.8 0%	92.4 2%	84.9 -7%	71.2 -22%	85.3 -6%
Response Times		139%	-74%	70%	35%	73%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	10.2 ?(5.8, 4.4)	15.2 ?(11.2, 4) -49%	38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n) -276%	5.1 ?(2.3, 2.8) 50%	12.3 ?(5.7, 6.6) -21%	4.2 ?(2.1, 2.1) 59%
Response Time Black / White *	62.04 ?(58.04, 4)	19 ?(10.6, 8.4) 69%	26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n) 57%	6.6 ?(2.2, 4.2) 89%	5.9 ?(2.2, 3.7) 90%	8 ?(3.8, 4.2) 87%
PWM Frequency	2420 ?(100)	12000 ?(100) 396%	2380 ?(100) -2%
Screen		-147%	417%	-1018%	-962%	-1303%
Brightness middle	730	712 -2%	606 -17%	470 -36%	511 -30%	549.6 -25%
Brightness	729	703 -4%	602 -17%	459 -37%	469 -36%	524 -28%
Brightness Distribution	94	95 1%	93 -1%	93 -1%	86 -9%	89 -5%
Black Level *	0.0045	0.07 -1456%	0.0001 98%	0.42 -9233%	0.4 -8789%	0.53 -11678%
Contrast	162222	10171 -94%	6060000 3636%	1119 -99%	1278 -99%	1037 -99%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.65	1.7 70%	4.8 15%	1.86 67%	0.95 83%	3.32 41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.11	4 60%	8.2 19%	3.87 62%	2.07 80%	6.63 34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.85	1.2 35%	1.8 3%	0.93 50%	0.91 51%	2.7 -46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.1	2.8 65%	6.5 20%	2.7 67%	0.6 93%	2 75%
Gamma	1.98 ^111%	2.21 ^100%	2.63 ^84%	2.246 ^98%	2.176 ^101%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	5874 ^111%	6978 ^93%	6596 ^99%	6711 ^97%	6545 ^99%	6319 ^103%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-3% / -61%	114% / 235%	-317% / -645%	-315% / -617%	-411% / -828%

* ... smaller is better

Razer宣传该面板的DCI-P3覆盖率为100%，而我们的测量结果也证实了这一点。我们还观察到sRGB色域的完整覆盖率和Adobe RGB的91%的出色覆盖率，这意味着Blade 16的显示屏对游戏玩家和内容创作者来说都是适用的。

从主观上讲，迷你LED显示屏是一种视觉享受，具有接近无限的黑色和强烈的色彩。仔细观察会发现有一些花屏现象，但这并不令人分心，不会妨碍观看体验。

这是你能得到的最接近OLED的质量，同时也能获得高亮度水平的好处。

尽管工厂校准似乎降低了SDR的整体亮度，但与Windows默认ICC配置文件的值相比，Delta E值要好得多。也就是说，工厂色彩校准并不完美，有很多改进的余地。

我们使用X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3分光光度计和Portrait Displays的Calman Ultimate色彩校准软件在DCI-P3色彩空间中校准了Blade 16的显示屏。

我们的校准程序使灰度和ColorChecker测量中的平均Delta E值明显改善，分别为1.3和1.85。红色和100%的蓝色显示出最高的偏差，但最大的Delta E值为3.75，对于大多数创造性的工作流程来说仍然是相当适用的。请注意，校准后的亮度水平再次下降。

校准后的ICC文件可以从上面的链接下载。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
62.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 58.04 ms rise
62.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.8 ms rise
10.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

迷你LED阵列使得准确测量响应时间变得有点复杂。高闪烁意味着我们不得不在整个脉冲范围内进行数据采样，并手动确定上升和下降时间。因此，上面提到的数值对于游戏笔记本来说似乎高于正常值，特别是在100%黑色到100%的过渡期。

Razer宣传的响应时间为3毫秒，但不清楚这个数值是在什么条件下获得的。我们使用了100%的SDR亮度设置，但Razer有可能选择了更低的亮度。也就是说，120赫兹的刷新率似乎并没有导致任何可察觉的重影问题。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2420 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2420 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2420 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们观察到，在所有测试的亮度水平上，PWM为2,420赫兹，这已经足够高了。在0%的亮度下，PWM增加到9.89MHz，这和没有闪烁一样好。

高亮度水平有助于在户外获得良好的观看体验，即使在阳光直射下也是如此。可视角度非常稳定，只有在极端情况下亮度损失很小。

性能：酷睿i9-13950HX和RTX 4090组合落后于竞争对手

我们的Razer Blade 16 Early 2023装置采用了英特尔酷睿i9-13950HX和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑GPU.买家还可以选择其他几种刀片16的配置，如介绍中所示。

请注意，双模式迷你LED显示屏只适用于采用RTX 4070笔记本GPU和RTX 4090笔记本GPU的配置。

测试条件

Razer Synapse允许根据需要改变各种性能模式。为了让Core i9-13950HX和RTX 4090充分施展它们的力量，我们使用了带有CPU Boost和GPU High选项的自定义模式。这导致了110W的持续PL1和130W的短时爆发式提升。

我们使用dGPU模式来运行图形测试。笔记本电脑支持高级优化，所以你可以很容易地在MSHybrid和dGPU之间直接从Nvidia控制面板切换，而不必重新启动。测试期间，G-Sync被禁用。

性能模式的选择会对散热和噪音排放产生影响。下表说明了PL1和PL2在每种性能设置下的变化。

只有平衡模式是以电池电量提供的。我们在电池测试中使用了这种模式，并启用了自动切换到60 Hz刷新率的选项。

性能模式	PL1（PBP）/ Tau	PL2（MTP）/ Tau
静音	32.5 W / 56 s	37 W / 2.44 ms
平衡模式	54 W / 56 s	55 W / 2.44 ms
定制（CPU Boost / GPU High）	110 W / 56 s	130 W / 2.44 ms

处理器

英特尔酷睿i9-13950HX是猛禽湖-HX部件，有24个核心和32个线程，可以实现5.5GHz的单核提升。

当我们审查配备RTX 4080的Razer Blade 16时，竞争者大多是由英特尔Alder Lake和AMD Ryzen 6000系列芯片驱动的设备。

在过去一个月左右，英特尔13代和AMD Ryzen 7000系列笔记本不断涌现。这使我们能够做一个更现代的比较，不幸的是，2023年的刀片16都在最新的竞争中挣扎。

尽管有一个强大的蒸汽室冷却器，但配备RTX 4090的Blade 16在Cinebench R15多核循环测试中未能保持良好的性能。我们看到在第19次运行时下降了29%，然后在第21次循环中恢复了速度。这与配备RTX 4080的Blade 16不同，后者显示了良好的持续性能。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø3945 (3056-4339.34)

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4802 (4757.37-4969.56)

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø5385 (5255.55-5554.01)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4980 (4889.98-5226.71)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4735 (4684.94-4780.69)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2914 (2871.5-3068.66)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX; turbo: Ø4509 (4425.76-4764.17)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4416 (1123.72-4730.93)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4574 (4429.68-4819.28)

累计性能比平均水平提高了17%，是一个不错的成绩。酷睿i9-12950HX.这款酷睿i9-13900HX联想Legion Pro 7中的酷睿i9-13950HX由于其130W/185W的高PL1/PL2值，轻松超过了Blade 16的酷睿i9-13950HX。

同样，微星Titan GT77 HX 13VI的CPU与Blade 16的CPU相同，由于其150 W PL1和220 W PL2，能够在CPU基准测试中获得更高的累积分数。

该 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16中的AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX在整体上比Blade 16中的Core i9-13950HX领先12%。

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-13900K	86.4 pt
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	78.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	77.5 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	76.4 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	76.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	74.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	73.1 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	72.4 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	67.7 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	66.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	57.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	57.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX	56.1 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (32592 - 40103, n=4)	37310 Points +31%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	34521 (32987.6^min - 34521.3^max) Points +21%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	33277 Points +17%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	32623 (30004.7^min - 32622.9^max) Points +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	31572 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	30162 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	30139 Points +6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28681 (25585.5^min - 28680.9^max) Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28422 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	26736 (22394.1^min - 26736.1^max) Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points -24%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (16277 - 23113, n=7)	19930 Points -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	19469 (17696.3^min - 19468.6^max) Points -32%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (2203 - 2272, n=4)	2238 Points +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2140 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	2126 Points +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2100 Points +8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2092 Points +7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2076 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	2043 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2029 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	1974 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1952 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	1940 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1465 - 1922, n=7)	1835 Points -6%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (13415 - 15181, n=4)	14459 Points +35%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	13457 Points +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	12648 Points +18%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	12541 Points +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	12073 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	11510 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	11500 Points +7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	10919 Points +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	10738 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	8697 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points -23%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6625 - 8777, n=7)	7689 Points -28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	7411 Points -31%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (828 - 870, n=4)	849 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	824 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	818 Points +8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	803 Points +6%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	802 Points +6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	797 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	788 Points +5%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	756 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	754 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	751 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	742 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (703 - 741, n=7)	727 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points -4%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (5321 - 6191, n=8)	5798 Points +34%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	5554 (5255.55^min - 5554.01^max) Points +28%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	5227 (4889.98^min - 5226.71^max) Points +20%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4970 (4757.37^min - 4969.56^max) Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	4819 (4429.68^min - 4819.28^max) Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	4781 (4684.94^min - 4780.69^max) Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	4764 (4425.76^min - 4764.17^max) Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	4731 (1123.72^min - 4730.93^max) Points +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4529 (4463.29^min - 4528.99^max) Points +4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4481 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4339 (3056^min - 4339.34^max) Points
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points -22%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (2464 - 3530, n=7)	3090 Points -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	3069 (2871.5^min - 3068.66^max) Points -29%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (299 - 328, n=8)	314 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	312 Points +12%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	307 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	306 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	296 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	301 Points +8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	300 Points +8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	299 Points +8%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	297 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	292 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	278 Points
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	274 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (167 - 276, n=7)	257 Points -8%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * -47%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (138 - 193, n=7)	171.4 Seconds * -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	166 Seconds * -42%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	117 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	114 Seconds * +3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	111 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	106 Seconds * +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	105 Seconds * +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	103 Seconds * +12%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	101 Seconds * +14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	100 Seconds * +15%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	93 Seconds * +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (80 - 101, n=7)	85.7 Seconds * +27%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (127201 - 148053, n=5)	142777 MIPS +31%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	135927 MIPS +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	127295 MIPS +17%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	127283 MIPS +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	123833 MIPS +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	122254 MIPS +12%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	116665 MIPS +7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	114658 MIPS +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	109330 MIPS 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	108860 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	79032 MIPS -27%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (65637 - 85019, n=7)	77515 MIPS -29%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (7176 - 7539, n=5)	7343 MIPS +9%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	7319 MIPS +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	7084 MIPS +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	7035 MIPS +5%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6999 MIPS +4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	6909 MIPS +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	6897 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6880 MIPS +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6715 MIPS
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6445 MIPS -4%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	6245 MIPS -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6022 - 6318, n=7)	6174 MIPS -8%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (22448 - 24157, n=5)	23743 Points +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	21058 Points +26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	20847 Points +24%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	20779 Points +24%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	20634 Points +23%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	20036 Points +19%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	19583 Points +17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	19433 Points +16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	18152 Points +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	16776 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	15410 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (14028 - 16009, n=7)	15046 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points -11%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (2106 - 2290, n=5)	2237 Points +14%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	2132 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2099 Points +7%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2081 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	2044 Points +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2043 Points +4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2035 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	2025 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	1974 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1959 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1847 - 1945, n=7)	1891 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1805 Points -8%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (34.5 - 42.6, n=5)	39.9 fps +31%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	34.8 fps +14%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	34.4 fps +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	33.4 fps +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	32.7 fps +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	31.9 fps +5%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	31 fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	30.5 fps
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	29.7 fps -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28.7 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps -24%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (18.6 - 26.5, n=7)	22.3 fps -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	21.7 fps -29%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	60.4 s * -16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	52.1 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	50.5 s * +3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	47.7 s * +8%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	47.5 s * +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	46.5 s * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	44 s * +16%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	43.4 s * +17%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (34.7 - 45.4, n=7)	40.2 s * +23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	36 s * +31%
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (30.3 - 41.6, n=5)	35.3 s * +32%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	32.8 s * +37%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * -11%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (0.4251 - 0.4515, n=7)	0.4374 sec * -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4121 sec * -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	0.412 sec * -4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4033 sec * -2%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	0.3982 sec * -0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3979 sec * -0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.3971 sec *
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.3955 sec * -0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.387 sec * +3%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3799 sec * +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.3793 sec * +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (0.3468 - 0.3911, n=5)	0.3597 sec * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4339 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

290 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

278 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

10738 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

754 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1952 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

28422 Points

Help

... in comparison

在Cinebench R15循环测试中看到的不寻常的图表也反映在可用的性能模式下评估各种CPU参数。在平衡和静音模式下运行循环测试时，没有看到这种模式。

在自定义设置中，我们看到封装功率达到最大137.6W，导致4.4GHz的最大提升，核心温度高达90℃。可能是Razer在核心温度达到90°C时，实施了苛刻的温度容忍度。这导致封装功率下降到74瓦，然后再恢复到130瓦，循环往复。

在这种情况下，平衡模式似乎有点宽松。我们看到时钟接近4.4GHz，峰值封装功率为59W，最大核心温度为79℃。这种模式对于大多数使用情况来说应该是足够的。

静音模式在时钟方面受到相当大的冲击，但峰值核心温度是可控的69℃，同时最大消耗39.7瓦。

在Cinebench R15循环中的CPU时钟、核心温度和封装功率。(红色：自定义，绿色：静音，蓝色：平衡）。

在电池方面，Blade 16运行在平衡模式下。虽然单核性能只受到5%的打击，但在Cinebench R20中，多核得分下降了57%。也就是说，降低的性能应该仍然足以在移动中完成一些工作。

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023总体上提供了良好的CPU性能，但相对较低的功率限制使其在竞争中处于不利地位。

Performance Rating
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	95.6 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	89.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	88.5 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	87.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX	86.2 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	71.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	66.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	28957 KRay/s +60%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	28701 KRay/s +58%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	27594 KRay/s +52%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	27227 KRay/s +50%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	26741 KRay/s +47%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	25949 KRay/s +43%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	25857 KRay/s +43%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (18131 - 28957, n=7)	24817 KRay/s +37%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	18961 KRay/s +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	18131 KRay/s

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144303 Points +32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138190 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	133668 Points +22%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	131131 Points +20%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	130870 Points +20%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	129286 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (102591 - 144303, n=7)	127039 Points +16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	125944 Points +15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	109158 Points
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93802 Points -14%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7093 MB/s +19%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7029 MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	6949 MB/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6750 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6596 MB/s +11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6350 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	6338 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (4981 - 7093, n=7)	6323 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	5937 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	4207 MB/s -29%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	143409 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141427 Points +3%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141385 Points +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	139649 Points +2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	137876 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136898 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (131931 - 140103, n=7)	136822 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	134227 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	133226 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	120181 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points -15%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	17179 Points +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	17117 Points +38%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	17057 Points +38%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	17026 Points +38%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	16073 Points +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15813 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15807 Points +28%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (12381 - 17057, n=7)	15365 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	12381 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	11631 Points -6%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	71038 Points +53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	70739 Points +52%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	66924 Points +44%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	66753 Points +43%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	66336 Points +43%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64736 Points +39%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	63308 Points +36%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (46539 - 71038, n=7)	61883 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points +15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	46539 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	46487 Points 0%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	236139 MB/s +15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	204491 MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136551 MB/s -33%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (99981 - 204491, n=7)	135969 MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134166 MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	128070 MB/s -37%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	127698 MB/s -38%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	125644 MB/s -39%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	122159 MB/s -40%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s -47%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85007 MB/s -58%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2059 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2030 MB/s +18%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1958 MB/s +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1936 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1912 MB/s +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (1472 - 2069, n=7)	1854 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1850 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1829 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1724 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1204 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15573 KRay/s +59%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15540 KRay/s +59%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	14948 KRay/s +53%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	14722 KRay/s +50%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	14671 KRay/s +50%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14066 KRay/s +44%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	13844 KRay/s +41%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (9787 - 15573, n=7)	13467 KRay/s +38%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	10342 KRay/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	9787 KRay/s

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50864 MPixel/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	50834 MPixel/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49634 MPixel/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	48626 MPixel/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	48325 MPixel/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (40233 - 50864, n=7)	47552 MPixel/s -7%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	44308 MPixel/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	44016 MPixel/s -13%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	40896 MPixel/s -20%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s -22%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	37069 MPixel/s -27%

查看我们专门的英特尔酷睿i9-13950HX页面了解更多信息和性能比较。

系统性能

PCMark 10总分显示，Razer Blade 16落后于Ryzen 9 7945HX驱动的Zephyrus Duo 16 17%，但这些设备在CrossMark总分中显示出或多或少相同的性能。

在日常使用中，我们没有遇到任何关于系统性能和响应性的问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	9151 Points +20%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9016 Points +19%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8884 Points +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	8764 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8277 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7597 - 8884, n=2)	8241 Points +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7888 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7830 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points +2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7609 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7597 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7223 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	12176 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	12031 Points +10%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11983 Points +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11761 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11703 Points +7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11683 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11659 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10903 - 11761, n=2)	11332 Points +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11078 Points +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10903 Points
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	11833 Points +42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11046 Points +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10788 Points +30%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10755 Points +29%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points +19%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9851 Points +18%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9645 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8330 - 9851, n=2)	9091 Points +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	8330 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	8271 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7686 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	16424 Points +25%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	15430 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (13099 - 16424, n=2)	14762 Points +13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	14535 Points +11%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	14432 Points +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	13099 Points
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11949 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11058 Points -16%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10611 Points -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10319 Points -21%

CrossMark / Overall
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2195 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2182 Points +8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2139 Points +6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2127 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	2080 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2019 - 2139, n=2)	2079 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2078 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2019 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1972 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1592 Points -21%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2044 Points +7%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2032 Points +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1977 Points +4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1969 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1946 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1909 - 1977, n=2)	1943 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1909 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1909 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1845 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1509 Points -21%

CrossMark / Creativity
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2514 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	2455 Points +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2423 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2400 Points +8%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2390 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2377 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2222 - 2423, n=2)	2323 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2233 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2222 Points
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1780 Points -20%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1990 Points +11%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1891 Points +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1861 Points +4%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1845 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1792 - 1861, n=2)	1827 Points +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1792 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points -5%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1689 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1658 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1634 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1342 Points -25%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4861 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5206 points
PCMark 10 Score		7597 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78494 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77544 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77096 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77060 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (61938 - 78494, n=7)	73266 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	70473 MB/s -10%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	68327 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67561 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s -17%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	63863 MB/s -19%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	62189 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86207 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85503 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	85073 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84869 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (62368 - 86207, n=7)	78833 MB/s -8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	75155 MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	74518 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	72658 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	70351 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s -20%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	62807 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	80441 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76487 MB/s
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	75814 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (59501 - 80441, n=7)	72257 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	71007 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	70939 MB/s -7%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67857 MB/s -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67449 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s -13%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	60389 MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	59912 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	99.5 ns * -16%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.8 ns * -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (84.4 - 99.5, n=7)	90.3 ns * -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	89.3 ns * -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	88 ns * -2%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	87.6 ns * -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	87.5 ns * -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86 ns *
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.5 ns * +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	83.2 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

GeForce 驱动程序中有一个的已知错误导致高DPC延迟。Nvidia也承认https://us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/531.29/531.29-win11-win10-release-notes.pdf用LatencyMon测量时，Release 530 Driver for Windows会导致DPC延迟增加。

因此，我们观察到在dGPU模式下，中断到处理的延迟非常高，达到18,846.9微秒，同时GPU使用率也很高。这可以追溯到Nvidia内核模式驱动程序的20.87毫秒的高执行时间。

在MSHybrid模式下，中断到处理的最高延迟值下降到一个更合理但仍然很高的2,006微秒。

如此高的DPC延迟会给实时音频和视频编辑工作流程带来问题，这对这种配置和价格来说并不理想。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (dGPU)	18846.9 μs *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (MSHybrid)	2006 μs * +89%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5418.4 μs * +71%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4710.9 μs * +75%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4080.9 μs * +78%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2505 μs * +87%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (Edge 109.0.1518.70)	2448.6 μs * +87%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (Edge 110.0.1587.46)	1169.3 μs * +94%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1095 μs * +94%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (Edge 110.0.1587.57)	664.4 μs * +96%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	437.7 μs * +98%

* ... smaller is better

更多关于LatencyMon的比较可以在我们的 DPC延时排名页面上看到。

存储设备

我们的Blade 16 Early 2023设备配备了固态存储技术公司（SSTC）的两块1TB NVMe SSD。NVMe驱动器彼此堆叠在一起，主驱动器在下面，以有效利用主板空间。

整体磁盘性能符合预期，但它不能与基于三星PM9A1的配置相媲美。然而，4K写入性能，比大多数竞争者要好。

在我们的DiskSpd读取循环测试中，该硬盘在队列深度为8的初始部分能够维持得相当好，然后从循环31开始就会出现节流。

没有添加2.5英寸SATA驱动器的空间。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SSSTC CA6-8D1024

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6898.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4808.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 919.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 820.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 4051 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 4120 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 62.82 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 262.7 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2195.9 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2966.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.5 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	71.2 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	71.2 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	63.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	62.9 pt
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024	62 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	60.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	60 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	58.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	57.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	54.4 pt
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	52.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5598 (5462.22^min - 5597.85^max) MB/s +58%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	4842 (4719.64^min - 4842.11^max) MB/s +36%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4525 (4498.41^min - 4525.41^max) MB/s +27%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4093 (4067.17^min - 4092.59^max) MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3650 (3626.52^min - 3649.67^max) MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3917 (3883.93^min - 3916.78^max) MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3889 (3873.65^min - 3888.73^max) MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3844 (3257.93^min - 3843.87^max) MB/s +8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3834 (3626.9^min - 3834.31^max) MB/s +8%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (3428 - 4119, n=6)	3772 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3552 (3489.45^min - 3551.53^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s -2%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2756 (2741.19^min - 2756.29^max) MB/s -22%
seq write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7533 (7482.85^min - 7532.79^max) MB/s +94%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4378 (4355.78^min - 4378.43^max) MB/s +13%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4250 (4204.35^min - 4249.88^max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	4199 (3998.61^min - 4199.12^max) MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3881 (3721.08^min - 3880.99^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3798 (3750.39^min - 3798.15^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s -2%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (3242 - 4167, n=6)	3689 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3416 (3372.4^min - 3415.84^max) MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3366 (3313.08^min - 3366.35^max) MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3365 (3321.68^min - 3365.3^max) MB/s -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3242 (1498^min - 3241.78^max) MB/s -16%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2700 (2597.32^min - 2699.87^max) MB/s -30%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11242 (10740.3^min - 11242.2^max) MB/s +64%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	10774 (9137.92^min - 10774^max) MB/s +57%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	7048 (6068.56^min - 7047.9^max) MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6988 (5851.89^min - 6987.92^max) MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6872 (4963.33^min - 6872.25^max) MB/s 0%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (6810 - 6921, n=6)	6867 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6854 (5913.47^min - 6854.12^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6810 (6260.27^min - 6809.87^max) MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6682 (5778.28^min - 6681.95^max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s -8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6264 (5914.09^min - 6264.25^max) MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5023 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5017 (4534.25^min - 5017.23^max) MB/s -27%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9942 (9912.92^min - 9941.76^max) MB/s +118%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	8404 (8165.05^min - 8403.71^max) MB/s +84%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6004 (5933.65^min - 6004.3^max) MB/s +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5151 (5119.78^min - 5150.82^max) MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4943 (4923.06^min - 4943.2^max) MB/s +8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4905 (4886.66^min - 4904.61^max) MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s +6%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (4244 - 4831, n=6)	4578 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4571 (4228.28^min - 4571.37^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4426 (4263.58^min - 4426.04^max) MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4244 (427.59^min - 4244.22^max) MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3429 (3365.09^min - 3429.47^max) MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3387 (3363.41^min - 3386.9^max) MB/s -26%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	95.3 (93.25^min - 95.25^max) MB/s +52%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	83.1 (79.37^min - 83.07^max) MB/s +33%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	74.5 (73.46^min - 74.52^max) MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	74.1 (72.59^min - 74.06^max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s +5%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	64.3 (63.09^min - 64.34^max) MB/s +3%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (52.5 - 79.6, n=6)	63.8 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	62.5 (57.13^min - 62.48^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	62.5 (61.85^min - 62.46^max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	61.5 (60.59^min - 61.49^max) MB/s -2%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	59.8 (59.59^min - 59.78^max) MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	57.5 (57.09^min - 57.53^max) MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	56.5 (49.8^min - 56.49^max) MB/s -10%
4k q1 t1 write
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	280 (267.82^min - 279.79^max) MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	280 (219.78^min - 279.72^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	255 (243.79^min - 255.25^max) MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	239 (230.87^min - 239.2^max) MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	236 (223.33^min - 235.64^max) MB/s -16%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (126.7 - 280, n=6)	227 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s -21%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	220 (56.84^min - 219.56^max) MB/s -21%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	213 (205.52^min - 212.72^max) MB/s -24%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	164.3 (163.26^min - 164.34^max) MB/s -41%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	155.5 (148.87^min - 155.46^max) MB/s -44%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	124 (123.44^min - 123.99^max) MB/s -56%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	103.7 (103.17^min - 103.74^max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4100 (4085.58^min - 4100.1^max) MB/s +31%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3203 (3180.36^min - 3203.41^max) MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3140 (2418.16^min - 3140.47^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3111 (2388.54^min - 3111.42^max) MB/s -1%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (843 - 3203, n=6)	2780 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s -19%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1533 (1526.72^min - 1532.76^max) MB/s -51%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1527 (1525.66^min - 1526.54^max) MB/s -51%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1469 (1266.81^min - 1469.47^max) MB/s -53%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1359 (1291.24^min - 1359.27^max) MB/s -57%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1158 (1132.18^min - 1157.71^max) MB/s -63%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	713 (705.93^min - 712.59^max) MB/s -77%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	711 (692.26^min - 710.64^max) MB/s -77%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3537 (3519.01^min - 3536.66^max) MB/s +60%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2783 (2698.54^min - 2783.41^max) MB/s +26%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2689 (2088.87^min - 2688.7^max) MB/s +22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2213 (924.87^min - 2213.39^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2209 (1041.25^min - 2208.74^max) MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s -5%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (288 - 2213, n=6)	1710 MB/s -23%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1424 (1251.47^min - 1423.75^max) MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1282 (960.6^min - 1281.78^max) MB/s -42%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	494 (480^min - 493.6^max) MB/s -78%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	481 (462.66^min - 481.19^max) MB/s -78%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	468 (459.96^min - 467.77^max) MB/s -79%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	350 (343.49^min - 350.45^max) MB/s -84%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8224 Points +28%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7745 Points +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7311 Points +14%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (4008 - 7821, n=6)	6829 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points +5%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6435 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6429 Points
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6019 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5610 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5508 Points -14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4850 Points -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	4364 Points -32%
Score Read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3490 Points +23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3308 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3188 Points +12%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (1250 - 3587, n=6)	2986 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2848 Points
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points -14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2035 Points -29%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1885 Points -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1858 Points -35%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1761 Points -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1572 Points -45%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1554 Points -45%
Score Write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4164 Points +85%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3468 Points +54%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3235 Points +43%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3232 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points +38%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3010 Points +33%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2566 Points +14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2428 Points +8%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (2211 - 2566, n=6)	2419 Points +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2255 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1877 Points -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1691 Points -25%
Seq Read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9511 MB/s +66%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	7888 MB/s +38%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5770.79 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5731.31 MB/s
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5689 MB/s -1%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (4716 - 5771, n=6)	5475 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5429.33 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5370 MB/s -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5144.76 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4308.28 MB/s -25%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4077.84 MB/s -29%
Seq Write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7181 MB/s +128%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	5041 MB/s +60%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4064.76 MB/s +29%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3951.34 MB/s +25%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3904 MB/s +24%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s +18%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (2671 - 4201, n=6)	3518 MB/s +12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3153.03 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3058.47 MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2984 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2890.58 MB/s -8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2631.22 MB/s -17%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	85.9 MB/s +37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	75.5 MB/s +20%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	72.8 MB/s +16%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	69.72 MB/s +11%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	62.66 MB/s
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	59.2 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	58.78 MB/s -6%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (49.1 - 69.7, n=6)	58.7 MB/s -6%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	58.36 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	58 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	49.65 MB/s -21%
4K Write
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	241.69 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	227.62 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	220.74 MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	211 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	205.06 MB/s -10%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	189.7 MB/s -17%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (120.1 - 242, n=6)	189.1 MB/s -17%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	177.9 MB/s -22%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	170.35 MB/s -25%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	144.8 MB/s -36%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	114.7 MB/s -50%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2843.31 MB/s +29%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2744.3 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2558.72 MB/s +16%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (729 - 2959, n=6)	2379 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2212.03 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s -15%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1418.53 MB/s -36%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1271.5 MB/s -43%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1011 MB/s -54%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1011 MB/s -54%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	959 MB/s -57%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	925 MB/s -58%
4K-64 Write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3584 MB/s +109%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2856.24 MB/s +67%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2801.72 MB/s +64%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2723 MB/s +59%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +48%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2499.95 MB/s +46%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1944.47 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1929.02 MB/s +13%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (1712 - 1944, n=6)	1872 MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1712.38 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1072 MB/s -37%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	981 MB/s -43%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.087 ms * -47%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.059 ms *
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	0.044 ms * +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.036 ms * +39%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (0.023 - 0.059, n=6)	0.03233 ms * +45%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.031 ms * +47%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.029 ms * +51%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.028 ms * +53%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.026 ms * +56%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.025 ms * +58%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.02 ms * +66%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.082 ms * -49%
Average SSSTC CA6-8D1024 (0.032 - 0.154, n=6)	0.07283 ms * -32%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.063 ms * -15%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.056 ms * -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.055 ms *
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	0.035 ms * +36%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.023 ms * +58%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.021 ms * +62%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.02 ms * +64%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.019 ms * +65%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.017 ms * +69%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090: Ø5873 (3380.14-6883.48)

请参考我们的 SSD和HDD基准测试页面了解更多存储设备的比较。

GPU性能

我们的Blade 16设备配备了一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑GPU它的额定性能为175 W TGP。Razer没有说明动态提升值，但考虑到RTX 4090笔记本GPU的实际最大功率为150 W TGP，我们认为它是25 W。

Blade 16中的RTX 4090在整个3DMark性能方面并没有真正名列前茅。刀锋16早期2023 RTX 4090总体上领先于RTX 4080 SKU 8%，但落后于其他RTX 4090重量级产品，如微星Titan GT77 HX 13VI、华硕ROG Strix Scar 18, Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2，以及华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16.

华硕华硕ROG Strix G16搭配RTX 4080，以微弱优势超越了刀锋16。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	100 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	95.5 pt
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	95.1 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	92.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	90 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	88.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	85.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	85 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	82.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	67.9 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	56.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	69211 Points +14%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	66008 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (54073 - 73027, n=42)	65041 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	63818 Points +5%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	62240 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	60602 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	60038 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	58891 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	58631 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	56565 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points -28%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	39733 Points -34%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	164706 Points +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	159724 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (95671 - 164399, n=14)	142227 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	140386 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	138528 Points -1%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	49247 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	48101 Points +6%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	47798 Points +5%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	47611 Points +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (40259 - 53059, n=41)	46365 Points +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	45431 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	44568 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	43847 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	43525 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	40570 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points -31%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	28743 Points -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	22254 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	21167 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16950 - 23292, n=43)	20950 Points +6%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	20738 Points +5%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	20033 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	19836 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	19157 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	18441 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	18417 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	17650 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points -34%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	11683 Points -41%

3DMark 11 Performance		41433 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		244104 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		52227 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		31174 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		22713 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		18599 points
Help

... in comparison

电池上的GPU性能会受到相当大的冲击。3DMarkTime Spy 图形分数在电池供电时下降了75%。根据该基准，这应该仍然提供足够的性能，在1440p Ultra下以50帧的速度播放《战地5》。

在Optix和Classroom CUDA测试中，Blender 3.3看到Blade 16中的RTX 4090与其他类似配置的笔记本电脑性能相当，但与Ryzen 9 7945HX驱动的Zephyrus Duo 16的Classroom CPU相比，该笔记本电脑要慢52%。

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * -91%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	20 Seconds * -82%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	15 Seconds * -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	15 Seconds * -36%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	15 Seconds * -36%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	14 Seconds * -27%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	13 Seconds * -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9 - 19, n=39)	12.1 Seconds * -10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	11 Seconds * -0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	11 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	10 Seconds * +9%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	9 Seconds * +18%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.7 Seconds * -116%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	36 Seconds * -112%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	23 Seconds * -35%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	22 Seconds * -29%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	22 Seconds * -29%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	20 Seconds * -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16 - 24, n=39)	18.3 Seconds * -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	18 Seconds * -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	17 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	18 Seconds * -6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	17 Seconds * -0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	17 Seconds *
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	17 Seconds * -0%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	286 Seconds * -28%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	224 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	207 Seconds * +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (144 - 305, n=39)	199.1 Seconds * +11%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	196 Seconds * +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	192 Seconds * +14%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	187 Seconds * +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	180 Seconds * +20%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	175 Seconds * +22%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	175 Seconds * +22%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	147 Seconds * +34%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

刀锋16 RTX 4090在1080p Ultra下的累积游戏性能仅低于Zephyrus Duo 16，但与配备RTX 4070笔记本GPU的刀锋18相比，显示出15%的体面收益。微星Titan GT77和ROG Strix Scar 18都领先我们的测试单元13%，而Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2则在排行榜上名列前茅。

这些笔记本电脑有更高的PL2，在1080p等CPU限制的分辨率中可以派上用场。

Performance Rating - Percent
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	99.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W ^-1! Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.5 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	88.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	87.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	86.7 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	81 pt
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	66.5 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	216.3 (204^min) fps +24%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	198.9 (190^min, 191^P1) fps +14%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	178.6 (172^min, 173^P1) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	178 fps +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	178 (151^min) fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	176.8 (159^min) fps +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	175 (150^min) fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	174.8 (156^min, 157.44^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps -27%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113.9 (110^min) fps -35%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	149.8 (3.08^min, 111.1^P1) fps +16%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	146.1 (5.24^min, 100^P1) fps +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	145.5 (3.79^min, 100^P1) fps +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141.3 (4.69^min, 100^P1) fps +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	140.9 (3.54^min, 83.3^P1) fps +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	140.7 (3.02^min, 100^P1) fps +9%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134 (7.27^min, 90.9^P1) fps +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128.7 (3.97^min, 66.7^P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	127.7 (9.94^min, 83.3^P1) fps -1%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	121.4 (3.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps -12%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	194.9 fps +59%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	187.4 fps +53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	177.6 fps +45%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	169.6 fps +39%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	168.1 fps +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	162.4 fps +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	158.6 fps +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	157.8 fps +29%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	122.2 fps
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps -3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115.2 fps -6%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	421 (15.4^min, 302^P1) fps +28%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	373 (29.9^min, 272^P1) fps +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	366 (29.1^min, 263^P1) fps +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	338 (43.6^min, 243^P1) fps +3%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	333 (38^min, 227^P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	328 (81.9^min, 202^P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	323 (61.7^min, 222^P1) fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	318 (29.2^min, 228^P1) fps -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	315 (79.3^min, 225^P1) fps -4%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps -31%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	208 (39.5^min, 154.8^P1) fps -37%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	194.7 (160^min) fps +6%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	192.5 (164.4^min) fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	190.2 (160.9^min) fps +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	185.9 (157.5^min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	183.5 (149.1^min) fps
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	180.7 (154.9^min) fps -2%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	179.7 (153.7^min) fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	179 (152.4^min) fps -2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	178.6 (153.9^min) fps -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	160.7 (137.1^min) fps -12%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps -19%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	146.4 fps +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	142.8 fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	138.8 fps +2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	137.9 fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	137 fps +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	135.6 fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134.2 fps -1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134.1 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	131.8 fps -3%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	117.8 fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	116.4 fps -14%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps -21%

在大多数游戏中，我们看到在更高的分辨率下也有类似的趋势。在原生4K Ultra下的光线追踪与可玩的帧率并不是一个令人愉快的体验。然而，玩家可以在支持的游戏中利用DLSS 3 Frame Generation来实现显著的帧数提升。

The Witcher 3 v4.00
1920x1080 Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	150 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (120.4 - 217, n=7)	149 fps +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	137.6 (12.5^min, 38.6^P0.1, 48.9^P1) fps +14%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	133.9 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	125.3 (35.5^min, 57.7^P0.1, 92.5^P1) fps +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	120.4 (25.2^min, 31^P0.1, 77.1^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 150, n=17, last 2 years)	87.3 fps -27%
1920x1080 RT Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	66 fps +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	64.5 (12.9^min, 20^P0.1, 26.9^P1) fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (53.1 - 68, n=5)	63.4 fps +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	55.2 (4.72^min, 5.72^P0.1, 24.2^P1) fps +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	53.1 (3.82^min, 4.7^P0.1, 25.5^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (12.9 - 66, n=11, last 2 years)	42.3 fps -20%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (83.3 - 165.7, n=8)	105.5 fps +27%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	104 fps +25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	96.6 (14^min, 35.4^P0.1, 41.6^P1) fps +16%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	88 fps +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83.3 (24.1^min, 28.4^P0.1, 53.3^P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	81.1 (47.5^min, 54.2^P0.1, 64.1^P1) fps -3%
Average of class Gaming (40.5 - 104, n=11, last 2 years)	78.1 fps -6%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (41.6 - 84.4, n=7)	53.8 fps +29%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50 fps +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	49 (12.8^min, 15.1^P0.1, 33.6^P1) fps +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	42.8 (29.7^min, 32.1^P0.1, 35.6^P1) fps +3%
Average of class Gaming (21.4 - 52.8, n=8, last 2 years)	42.8 fps +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	41.6 (4.08^min, 5.95^P0.1, 19.2^P1) fps

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	216.3 (204^min) fps +24%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	198.9 (190^min, 191^P1) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (139.2 - 216, n=35)	198.5 fps +14%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	178.6 (172^min, 173^P1) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	178 fps +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	178 (151^min) fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	176.8 (159^min) fps +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	175 (150^min) fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	174.8 (156^min, 157.44^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps -27%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113.9 (110^min) fps -35%
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	167.6 (147^min) fps +29%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	160 fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (96.3 - 167.6, n=19)	143.6 fps +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	130 (121^min, 121^P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	120.6 (99^min) fps -7%
Average of class Gaming (50.6 - 167.6, n=43, last 2 years)	111.4 fps -14%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72.5 (66^min) fps -44%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	100 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (88.4 - 107.6, n=4)	97.7 fps +11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	88.4 (81^min, 81^P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	80.8 (76^min) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming (42.8 - 107.6, n=11, last 2 years)	71.6 fps -19%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50.6 (45^min) fps -43%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	159.7 (36^min) fps +65%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	135 fps +40%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	130.6 (34.83^min) fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (91 - 159.7, n=20)	124 fps +28%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	121.41 (57.6^min) fps +26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	119.7 (69^min) fps +24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	106.2 (47.5^min) fps +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	104.49 (20.29^min) fps +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	96.6 (24.5^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=71, last 2 years)	92.4 fps -4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	92.1 (17.3^min) fps -5%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	101.3 (36^min) fps +17%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	98 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (75.7 - 116, n=21)	95.4 fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	94.5 (72^min) fps +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86.7 (25^min) fps
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86 fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	81.98 (42.1^min) fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	81.2 (32.5^min) fps -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	75.69 (14.13^min) fps -13%
Average of class Gaming (37.7 - 116, n=58, last 2 years)	69 fps -20%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54 (35.6^min) fps -38%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	56 fps +23%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	47.8 (24.6^min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (38.8 - 56, n=16)	47.7 fps +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	45.4 (32.6^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	41.9 (10.06^min) fps -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	40 (20.8^min) fps -12%
Average of class Gaming (17.4 - 56, n=35, last 2 years)	35.7 fps -21%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	23.3 (15.6^min) fps -49%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	74 fps +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	68.7 (53^min) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (56.5 - 74, n=8)	65.6 fps +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	65.3 (31.7^min) fps +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	62.7 (21.7^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	58.68 (17.01^min) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (19.1 - 74, n=26, last 2 years)	48.1 fps -23%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	36.2 (16.2^min) fps -42%
3840x2160 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	22 fps +11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	19.8 (15.7^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16.5 - 22.4, n=7)	19.7 fps -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	19.3 (13.3^min) fps -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	17.26 (13.27^min) fps -13%
Average of class Gaming (3.3 - 22.4, n=11, last 2 years)	16.6 fps -16%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7.8 (3.7^min) fps -61%

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022
1920x1080 Extreme Quality Preset AA:T2X Filmic SM
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	176 fps +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	170 (98^P1) fps +10%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	170 (96^min) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (141 - 182, n=13)	167.6 fps +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	154 (80^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	148 (85^min) fps -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	145 (85^min) fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	140 (84^min) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming (15 - 182, n=35, last 2 years)	116.9 fps -24%
2560x1440 Extreme Quality Preset AA:T2X Filmic SM
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	135 fps +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	127 (65^P1) fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (104 - 137, n=14)	126.8 fps +4%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	125 (64^P0.1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	122 (61^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	111 (60^min) fps -9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	108 (58^min) fps -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	104 (58^min) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming (47 - 137, n=32, last 2 years)	96.6 fps -21%
3840x2160 Extreme Quality Preset DLSS Balanced AA:T2X Filmic SM
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	126 fps +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	112 (67^P1) fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	112 (74^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (86 - 126, n=5)	106.8 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming (55 - 126, n=6, last 2 years)	98.2 fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	98 (60^min) fps -12%
3840x2160 Extreme Quality Preset AA:T2X Filmic SM
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85 fps +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	81 (36^P1) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (63 - 86, n=12)	78.8 fps +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	75 (35^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	69 (33^min) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	67 (32^min) fps -11%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 86, n=21, last 2 years)	65.1 fps -13%

F1 22
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	140.6 (123^min, 97^P1) fps +23%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138.2 (118^min, 84^P1) fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (70.3 - 144.7, n=25)	125.3 fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	124.5 (107^min, 87^P1) fps +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	117 (95^min, 76^P1) fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	72.3 (47^min, 52^P1) fps -37%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	114.3 (96^min, 65^P1) fps
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	114.3 (92^min, 71^P1) fps 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	101 (90^min) fps -12%
Average of class Gaming (13 - 144.7, n=97, last 2 years)	84.5 fps -26%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	91.8 (78^min, 74^P1) fps +15%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	90.1 (78^min, 71^P1) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (65.9 - 92.2, n=25)	86.1 fps +8%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	80.3 (70^min, 58^P1) fps +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	79.7 (69^min, 39^P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	75 (23^min, 32^P1) fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	72 (51^min) fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (29.9 - 92.2, n=76, last 2 years)	61.9 fps -22%
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	45.3 (39^min, 37^P1) fps +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	44.9 (38^min, 37^P1) fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (36.8 - 46.1, n=18)	44.1 fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	44 (37^min, 34^P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	42.4 (36^min, 35^P1) fps -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	38 (31^min) fps -14%
Average of class Gaming (14.8 - 45.9, n=42, last 2 years)	35 fps -20%

F1 2021
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	209 (170^min, 105^P1) fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (151.6 - 271, n=7)	199.4 fps +32%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	182.4 (156^min, 136^P1) fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	151.6 (115^min, 88^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (27.6 - 271, n=17, last 2 years)	142.5 fps -6%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	192.4 (146^min, 114^P1) fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (140 - 204, n=7)	172.4 fps +14%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	159.7 (130^min, 108^P1) fps +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	151.5 (130^min, 89^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (74.3 - 204, n=12, last 2 years)	133.5 fps -12%
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	114.4 (99^min, 96^P1) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (89.9 - 115.1, n=5)	106.2 fps +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	103.6 (89^min, 67^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (50.2 - 115.1, n=6, last 2 years)	96.8 fps -7%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	160 fps +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	158 (117^min) fps +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	156 (109^min) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (117 - 218, n=21)	153.5 fps +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144 (98^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	133 fps -8%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)	130.5 fps -9%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	159 fps +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	153 (107^min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (115 - 194, n=23)	148.8 fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	146 (102^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	145 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (71 - 194, n=82, last 2 years)	118.9 fps -19%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	113 fps +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	107 (95^min) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (75 - 113, n=13)	102.7 fps +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	100 (84^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (39 - 113, n=29, last 2 years)	84.5 fps -15%

Witcher 3 FPS图表

当用TheWitcher 3 ，在1080p Ultra条件下，Blade 16保持相对稳定，但我们确实看到偶尔的帧数下降。

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø189.7 (166-213)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K DLSS	4K
GTA V (2015)	186.6	187.3	181.6	128.7	120.5		153.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)	452	408	322	174.8			130
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	234.8	209.9	200.2	183.5			170.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	194.5	155.9	122.2		115.7		83.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	197.3	172.1	135.6				113.1
Far Cry 5 (2018)		162	167	144	146		100
Strange Brigade (2018)	432	380	350	328	256		129.5
F1 2021 (2021)	433	341	299	151.6	151.5		103.6
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)		100.7	97.5	96.6	86.7		45.4
F1 22 (2022)	254	264	223	114.3	79.7		44
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022)	177	169	160	154	122	112	75
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023)	220	154.1	137.5	120.4	83.3		41.6

更多信息可以在我们专门的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU页面。此外，请务必查看我们对 RTX 4080和RTX 4090，以及 RTX 4050, RTX 4060, 和RTX 4070 笔记本电脑GPU进行详细的性能比较。

排放：高噪音和高热量输出

系统噪音

刀锋16在受到压力时，其风扇的转速会相当高。在Prime95和FurMark的综合负载下，我们记录的最大声压级（SPL）为46.7 db(A)，在测试的自定义配置文件中，在1080p Ultra下的 Witcher 3。

平衡模式下的风扇噪音更容易忍受，其最大发射量仅徘徊在41分贝（A）的水平。在静音模式下，无论负载如何，风扇噪音始终保持在35分贝（A）以下。

Ambient: 20.84 dB(A)
性能设置	空闲分贝(A)	负载平均分贝(A)	负载最大分贝(A)	Witcher 3 分贝(A)
静音	23.65	33.12	31.03	33.90
平衡型	23.65	30.03	38.20	40.69
定制（CPU Boost / GPU High）	23.65	43.35	46.72	46.65

Noise Level

Idle		23.65 / 23.65 / 23.65 dB(A)
Load		43.35 / 46.72 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 20.84 dB(A)

	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise		-15%	-20%	-21%	-2%	-19%	-5%
off / environment *	20.84	25.2 -21%	23.9 -15%	24.6 -18%	23 -10%	24 -15%	23.5 -13%
Idle Minimum *	23.65	28 -18%	23.9 -1%	29.2 -23%	23 3%	26 -10%	23.8 -1%
Idle Average *	23.65	28 -18%	32.9 -39%	29.2 -23%	23 3%	28 -18%	23.8 -1%
Idle Maximum *	23.65	30.4 -29%	36.5 -54%	29.2 -23%	23.6 -0%	34 -44%	26.8 -13%
Load Average *	43.35	41 5%	42.9 1%	50.7 -17%	39 10%	47 -8%	37.3 14%
Witcher 3 ultra *	46.7	50.7 -9%	51.2 -10%	53.3 -14%	51.6 -10%	55 -18%	48 -3%
Load Maximum *	46.72	52.6 -13%	56 -20%	61 -31%	51.3 -10%	56 -20%	53.5 -15%

* ... smaller is better

温度

当涉及到负载下的表面温度时，Razer Blade 16并不完全是一个冷静的客户。我们记录了最高的54.2°C，同时在1080p Ultra下用TheWitcher 3进行压力测试，而Prime95和FurMark的综合负载导致机箱顶部中心的热点为52°C。

大部分的热量都集中在顶排。笔记本电脑的底部会变得相当热，所以我们不建议在运行重负载时将设备放在腿上使用。在这种情况下，平衡型或静音型更适合。

掌托部位不会异常发热，但我们确实在左右掌托和触摸板上记录了约40℃的热点。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


49 °C	52 °C	51.6 °C
41.2 °C	41.2 °C	40.6 °C
38.8 °C	38.4 °C	34.4 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 43 °C


44.6 °C	47.4 °C	41.6 °C
44.8 °C	44 °C	47.6 °C
41.5 °C	42.8 °C	38.2 °C

Maximum: 47.6 °C
Average: 43.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


31.8 °C	32.8 °C	33 °C
30.2 °C	30.4 °C	29.8 °C
29.4 °C	29.2 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 30.6 °C


30.6 °C	30.4 °C	28.4 °C
30.4 °C	29.6 °C	29.8 °C
29.8 °C	30.2 °C	27.4 °C

Maximum: 30.6 °C
Average: 29.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


54.2 °C	53.3 °C	52 °C
42 °C	43.2 °C	41.6 °C
39.8 °C	40.6 °C	37.4 °C

Maximum: 54.2 °C
Average: 44.9 °C


47.8 °C	46.2 °C	43.4 °C
45.6 °C	46 °C	45.4 °C
44.2 °C	45 °C	40.4 °C

Maximum: 47.8 °C
Average: 44.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105.1 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.7 °C / -21.1 F).

显示器部分地阻挡了排气管，导致该区域的热量积聚过多。显示器底座也因此而大幅升温。

理想情况下，Razer应该在显示器底座和排风口之间提供更多的间隙。

	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		11%	8%	15%	11%	-6%	12%
Maximum Upper Side *	52	39 25%	44.2 15%	40.6 22%	40 23%	48 8%	39.2 25%
Maximum Bottom *	47.6	44 8%	46.8 2%	41.1 14%	37.6 21%	49 -3%	35.6 25%
Idle Upper Side *	33	31 6%	29.2 12%	26.2 21%	32.4 2%	40 -21%	31.8 4%
Idle Bottom *	30.6	29.8 3%	30.2 1%	30.3 1%	31.4 -3%	33 -8%	33.2 -8%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

刀片16使用一个蒸汽室冷却系统，以保持其强大的组件冷却。蒸气室在防止过度节流方面做得很好，我们的压力测试证明了这一点。

当用Prime95原地大型FFT进行压力测试时，显示酷睿i9-13950HX提升到4.36 GHz，而核心温度达到90℃。在测试的剩余时间里，CPU可以瞬间利用高达137W的功率，然后下降到大约100W。

在加入FurMark后，在无AA的情况下以1280 x 720运行，Blade 16牺牲了一些CPU功率，为RTX 4090 Laptop GPU提供了一些空间。然而，每当CPU试图从1.8 GHz提升到约2.2 GHz时，GPU的时钟就会明显下降。

与单独的Prime95压力相比，组合负载中的平均CPU封装功率从108 W下降到61 W。这使得RTX 4090能够吸收这些额外的功率，瞬间峰值高达231 W，导致峰值时钟为2415 MHz。

在TheWitcher 31080p Ultra的压力下，GPU的时钟和功率保持相对稳定。平均CPU封装功率进一步降低到42.7瓦，使RTX 4090能够舒适地在157瓦左右的平均水平上行驶。Core i9-13950HX和RTX 4090的平均时钟都接近2.1GHz。

在Prime95 + FurMark压力下，CPU/GPU的时钟、温度和功率变化

压力测试	CPU时钟(GHz)	GPU时钟(MHz)	CPU平均温度(℃)	GPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲	2.05	210	42	39.7
Prime95	2.56	210	87	63.1
Prime95 + FurMark	1.70	1,815	82	72
TheWitcher 3	3.64	1,815	83	81.8

发言人

众所周知，Razer为其Blades配备了体面的板载扬声器，Blade 16也不例外。刀锋16配备了两个扬声器和两个低音扬声器，由两个智能放大器供电。

75 dB(A)的峰值声压级似乎比我们之前在Blade 16 RTX 4080和Blade 18上看到的要低一些，但它的声音足以填满一个中等大小的房间。

低音响应很好，但考虑到专用低音单元的存在，肯定会更好。中音和高音层次分明，这对于休闲聆听来说应该是足够的。其他音频连接选项包括一个3.5毫米组合音频插孔和蓝牙5.3。

Razer提供了THX空间音频功能，但不幸的是，即使在更新了音频驱动后，我们也无法让该应用程序工作。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理：为配置提供经济的电力消耗

消耗功率

刀锋16 RTX 4090的空闲功耗偏高，但对于给定的配置来说，负载下的功耗似乎相当经济。该功耗模式与我们在上述压力测试中的观察结果基本吻合。

我们在自定义配置文件中记录的最大负载下的峰值功耗接近287W，因此提供的330W GaN电源适配器应该足以满足Blade 16的能源需求。与竞争对手的同类适配器相比，Razer的GaN电源砖更加紧凑和便携。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.15 / 7.8 Watt
Idle	27.5 / 34.4 / 35.4 Watt
Load	147.8 / 286.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, mini-LED, 3840x2400, 16"	Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"	Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 18"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		12%	9%	14%	11%	12%	2%	14%	32%
Idle Minimum *	27.5	14 49%	19.2 30%	14 49%	15.2 45%	18 35%	24.5 11%	16.9 ?(6 - 33.8, n=29) 39%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) 51%
Idle Average *	34.4	19.3 44%	29.7 14%	21.6 37%	22.8 34%	24 30%	34.1 1%	24 ?(10.9 - 42.6, n=29) 30%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) 45%
Idle Maximum *	35.4	36.8 -4%	30.8 13%	24.8 30%	49.8 -41%	32 10%	47.7 -35%	35.1 ?(11.6 - 57.9, n=29) 1%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) 25%
Load Average *	147.8	117.2 21%	126 15%	122.5 17%	121.2 18%	130 12%	140 5%	130.5 ?(79 - 201, n=29) 12%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) 28%
Witcher 3 ultra *	256	304 -19%	258 -1%	265 -4%	242 5%	260 -2%	202 21%
Load Maximum *	286.7	342.5 -19%	330 -15%	418 -46%	273.7 5%	320 -12%	261 9%	324 ?(221 - 418, n=29) -13%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) 13%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø147.8 (113-173.3)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø204 (134.3-287)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø256 (245-271)

Power Consumption: External monitor

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø134.5 (105.2-223)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø197 (194.3-198.3)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; Cinebench R20 Single (external Monitor): Ø79.4 (71.8-121.1)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; Cinebench R20 Multi (external Monitor): Ø196.8 (187.1-200)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø79.9 (68.9-94.7)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø197.3 (191.9-200)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø239 (201-261)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø242 (232-257)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø35 (31.2-39.4)

电池寿命

在我们的标准化Wi-Fi浏览测试中，所提供的95.2WHr的双电池组在150尼特下实现了5.45小时的运行时间。这只比雷蛇Blade 16 RTX 4080略胜一筹。

在150尼特下的视频播放运行时间比竞争对手好很多，接近8.5小时。

考虑到强大的内部结构，电池在负载下只能维持约1.5小时。配备RTX 4080和99.9WHr电池的联想Legion Pro 7可以持续53%的时间。

Battery Runtime

Witcher 3 ultra 150cd		1h 35min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 45.5min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		2h 50.8min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 21min

	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh	Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-12%	-38%	-10%	3%	21%	-16%	-6%
H.264	503		230 -54%	358 -29%				408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) -19%
WiFi v1.3	345.5	305 -12%	238 -31%	319 -8%	365 6%	303 -12%	240 -31%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 9%
Witcher 3 ultra	95							78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years) -18%
Load	81		57 -30%	86 6%	81 0%	124 53%	80 -1%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) 5%
Reader / Idle					533	385	420	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 优质、坚固的底盘

+ 良好的SD卡和Wi-Fi传输速度

+ 宽敞的触摸板

+ 华丽的、接近OLED质量的微型LED显示屏

+ 负载下的经济耗电

Cons

- 机箱是一个油污和指纹磁铁

- 只有一个Type-C端口是支持雷电4的

- 双模式显示选项似乎很有噱头

- 不是最快的Core i9-13950HX和RTX 4090组合

- 高热量和噪音排放

评语：发烧友的刀锋16，对性能鉴赏家来说并不那么重要

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090。审查单位由Nvidia印度公司提供。

配备RTX 4090笔记本GPU的Razer Blade 16 Early 2023第一眼就唤起了人们的兴奋。光滑的16英寸机箱看起来和感觉都很好，雷蛇必须赞扬它在极简主义和游戏美学之间取得了正确的平衡。虽然很坚固，但由于所有的污渍，它很快就会变成一个碍眼的东西。

Razer在2023年的Blade 16上做对了很多事情。高吞吐量的SD读卡器、稳定的Wi-Fi 6E、体面的1080p网络摄像头、充足的I/O和增加的触摸板面积都是Blade 16的好兆头。键盘很好，有明亮的背光，但雷蛇本可以实现更长的行程和/或纳入光学键。

双模式迷你LED显示屏是Blade 16 Early 2023的主要USP，这也是世界上第一款采用双模式的笔记本电脑。在UHD+ 120赫兹和FHD+ 240赫兹模式之间切换的能力，对同时进行游戏的创作者来说很有用。

然而，在所有的炒作之外，双模式的实施并不完美。切换不是动态的，每次都需要重新启动。此外，FHD+模式显示出明显的模糊画面，而且人们失去了改变颜色配置文件的能力。然而，在UHD+模式下，Blade 16的显示屏以高亮度和华丽的SDR/HDR视觉效果脱颖而出，尽可能地接近OLED质量。

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023是一个诱人的前景，其价格令人瞠目结舌。拥有酷睿i9-13950HX，175W RTX 4090笔记本GPU，以及充满活力的双模式UHD+迷你LED显示屏，新的Razer Blade 16检查了2023年高端游戏笔记本电脑的大部分盒子。然而，以4300美元的价格，人们会期待一个各方面都近乎完美的笔记本电脑，但这里的情况并非如此"。

Blade 16 Early 2023采用了顶级的硬件，包括英特尔酷睿i9-13950HX和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑GPU.虽然这个组合轻松地战胜了去年的高端旗舰游戏笔记本电脑，而没有打破汗水，但在2023年，事情已经开始变得极具竞争力。

刀片16落后于其他高端游戏笔记本电脑，如微星Titan GT77 HX 13VI, 联想Legion Pro 7，以及华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16在CPU性能方面。当涉及到图形负载时，性能的差距有些缩小了。

RTX 4090笔记本电脑的GPU有时会被RTX 4080笔记本电脑的GPU所掩盖。 RTX 4080笔记本GPU由于CPU瓶颈，在1080p Ultra下，该卡在QHD和4K下表现良好，具体取决于标题。任何使用光线追踪的4K Ultra游戏计划都需要启用DLSS 2或DLSS 3 Frame Generation以获得可玩的帧率。

刀锋16的散热能力很强，但肯定还有改进的余地。蒸气室在保持部件冷却方面做得不错，但它不能完全控制CPU和GPU在自定义电源配置文件中的最大负载。

高的表面温度可能是一个障碍。风扇的噪音水平对于这种口径的游戏笔记本来说是正常的。板载的声音质量在大多数情况下是可用的。

闲置时的功耗很高，但考虑到配置，在负载下却出奇的经济。新的GaN电源适配器的占地面积大大减少，能够毫无问题地提供330W。对于简单的网页浏览和低亮度水平的视频播放来说，电池寿命是不错的。任何程度的压力都会使电池寿命下降。

总的来说，对于4300美元的要价来说，Razer Blade 16 Early 2023是一个混合袋。如果你已经是Razer的粉丝，升级到最新的规格应该能提供切实的性能优势，以及Razer笔记本电脑闻名的所有诡计。

或者你可以通过选择以下产品来节省700美元刀片16早期2023 RTX 4080.这两个SKU之间的性能差异在这一点上不值得额外的要价。

新的Blade 16还将吸引那些将显示质量置于其他方面之上的人。然而，如果你只追求性能数字，今年的Blade 16有严重的竞争者，他们踢了屁股。

而我们才刚刚开始!

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 with RTX 4090 Laptop GPU可在Razer.com和Best Buy4,299.99美元，并在美国亚马逊目前的标价更高，为5,199美元。

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 - 03/23/2023 v7 ^(old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis

92 / 98 → 94%

Keyboard

83%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

75 / 80 → 94%

Weight

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Battery

72 / 95 → 76%

Display

90%

Games Performance

97%

Application Performance

96%

Temperature

79 / 95 → 83%

Noise

86 / 90 → 96%

Audio

71%

Camera

43 / 85 → 51%

Average

80%

90%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Vaidyanathan Subramaniam - Managing Editor - 1957 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

contact me via: @Geeky_Vaidy

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090评论：酷睿i9-13950HX巨兽，全球首款双模迷你LED UHD+显示屏

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 2023-03-23 (Update: 2023-03-23)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳：真正的Razer风格的高级和坚固的外壳

尺寸比较

连接性：高通量SD卡和Wi-Fi

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

安全问题

维护

配件和保修

输入设备：与早期的刀片没有太大区别

键盘

触摸板

显示：明亮、接近OLED质量的双模式迷你LED，具有高PWM功能

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能：酷睿i9-13950HX和RTX 4090组合落后于竞争对手

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

系统性能

DPC延时

存储设备

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU性能

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS图表

排放：高噪音和高热量输出

系统噪音

温度

压力测试

发言人

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

能源管理：为配置提供经济的电力消耗

消耗功率

Power Consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power Consumption: External monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语：发烧友的刀锋16，对性能鉴赏家来说并不那么重要

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison