华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY笔记本电脑评测:英特尔不再是国王
在2023年的CES上亮相,华硕刷新了其顶级的17.3英寸ROG Strix Scar 17系列,采用了最新的13代英特尔CPU、Zen 4 AMD CPU和Nvidia Ada Lovelace GPU来取代去年的阵容。然而,除了这些内部升级外,外部机箱设计同比几乎保持一致。我们建议查看我们现有的关于2022年ROG Strix Scar 17的评论,以了解更多关于2023年机型的物理特征。它们之间的任何差异都将在下面指出。
我们审查的配置是最高端的SKU,配备Ryzen 9 7945HX CPU和175 WGeForce RTX 4090 GPU。其他SKU可低至RTX 4060,但截至目前,它们都配备了相同的240 Hz 1440p IPS面板。
Strix Scar 17的竞争对手包括其他高端17英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 Razer Blade 17, 阿利安人m17, 微星GE77, 或 Aorus 17.
更多华硕评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 23 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 30.7 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
83.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 30 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.1 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | 3.4 kg | 26.7 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 没有变化...几乎
2023年和2022年的模型之间有以下三个重要区别:
- 华硕基石不再得到支持。制造商可能认识到,当初很少有业主使用该功能。
- 新的网络摄像头。现在有一个集成的网络摄像头,而去年的型号会完全缺乏一个。
- 掌托和外盖上有新的表面标记。
整体底盘在其他方面与前一年相同。
沟通
Wi-Fi 6E由联发科MT7922提供,而不是更常见的英特尔AX211,可能是因为这是一个以AMD-NVIDIA为重点的设计。然而,当与我们的华硕AXE11000测试路由器配对时,传输速率和性能是稳定和可靠的。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
网络摄像头
尽管有网络摄像头总比没有网络摄像头好,但华硕通过安装一个100万像素的传感器,而不是200万或500万像素的传感器,采用了最低限度的共同标准。其他游戏笔记本电脑,如 阿利安人m17 R1或 Razer Blade有更高的分辨率网络摄像头相比。华硕不支持红外线。
维护
显示屏 - 1440p甜蜜点
2023年的机型采用了与2022年机型相同的240赫兹京东方NE173QHM-NZ2 IPS面板。因此,我们下面的测量结果几乎是同比相同的。这不一定是坏事,因为该面板提供了非常快的响应时间,完整的DCI-P3色彩,以及一个体面的对比度,适合图形编辑和游戏。然而,正在寻找4K或OLED选项的用户,目前运气不佳。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 322.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1112:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.56
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US AU Optronics B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Aorus 17X XES Sharp SHP1563, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 0% | -16% | -15% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98 | 97.1 -1% | 97.6 0% | 69.1 -29% | 70.1 -28% | 97.2 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.6 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.6 | 84.8 -1% | 86.5 1% | 69.8 -18% | 71.9 -16% | 88.4 3% |
Response Times | 10% | 38% | -38% | 47% | -84% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.2 ? | 5.7 ? 8% | 4.2 ? 32% | 12 ? -94% | 3.4 ? 45% | 16.4 ? -165% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11.4 ? | 10.1 ? 11% | 6.4 ? 44% | 9.4 ? 18% | 5.8 ? 49% | 11.6 ? -2% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 5% | -93% | -20% | -102% | -161% | |
Brightness middle | 322.5 | 320 -1% | 398.6 24% | 417.3 29% | 278 -14% | 484 50% |
Brightness | 317 | 303 -4% | 384 21% | 387 22% | 273 -14% | 449 42% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 87 1% | 89 3% | 87 1% | 79 -8% | 87 1% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.3 -3% | 0.46 -59% | 0.42 -45% | 0.26 10% | 0.55 -90% |
Contrast | 1112 | 1067 -4% | 867 -22% | 994 -11% | 1069 -4% | 880 -21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.15 | 1.1 4% | 4.05 -252% | 2.14 -86% | 3.96 -244% | 4.8 -317% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.03 | 2.7 11% | 8.68 -186% | 4.09 -35% | 10.78 -256% | 7.48 -147% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.56 | 1.02 -82% | 0.42 25% | 1.07 -91% | 4.74 -746% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.1 35% | 6.5 -282% | 3.1 -82% | 6.8 -300% | 5.5 -224% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.13 103% | 2.11 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.224 99% | 2.42 91% |
CCT | 6299 103% | 6599 98% | 7518 86% | 6040 108% | 7651 85% | 6148 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
4% | -18% /
-54% | -25% /
-22% | -23% /
-62% | -81% /
-116% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器开箱即预校准,平均灰度和彩色deltaE值非常低,分别只有1.7和1.15。因此不需要进行最终用户校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.9 ms rise | |
↘ 5.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise | |
↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能--瑞星Ryzen
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过华硕Armoury Crate将我们的设备设置为涡轮模式和独立GPU模式。我们鼓励用户熟悉Armoury Crate,因为它是电源模式、MUX、华硕灵气以及其他特定型号功能和更新的控制中心。
值得注意的是,我们在测试设备上遇到了几个问题。当在Optimus和dGPU模式之间切换时,系统有时会在重启时无法加载。这时需要进行硬重启。
处理器
处理器性能是所有笔记本电脑中最快的之一,详见我们对Ryzen 9 7945HX的评论。 我们对Ryzen 9 7945HX的回顾.尽管如此,它仍然落后于竞争对手的酷睿i9-13950HX或i9-13900HX只是在单线程操作方面略微落后。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (50388 - 60169, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (201874 - 252486, n=6) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (8525 - 10389, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (175140 - 200651, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (28794 - 32988, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (105740 - 134044, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (126790 - 325960, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (2022 - 2409, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (26875 - 31796, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (31421 - 40095, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8733 - 9151, n=2) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (11165 - 12176, n=2) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10266 - 11833, n=2) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (14432 - 15768, n=2) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1993 - 2078, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1838 - 1946, n=2) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2334 - 2377, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1584 - 1689, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 Score | 8733 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (48948 - 57953, n=6) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (56910 - 67753, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (58602 - 70063, n=6) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (77.1 - 91.3, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时,没有DPC问题。然而,运行Prime95,将诱发高中断延迟。在回放我们一分钟的4K60测试视频时,我们能够记录到2个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 检测到性能节流现象
我们的设备配备了一个 1TB SK hynix PC801顺序读取和写入率分别为7200MB/s和6200MB/s。然而,我们的设备中的驱动器在大约4分钟的压力后会表现出性能节流的问题,如下图所示。固态硬盘上没有散热器或热垫来帮助散热。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 175 WGeForce RTX 4090
的 移动GeForce RTX 4090比去年的移动RTX 3080 Ti的性能快60%至80%。 ROG Strix Scar 17 G733.因此,同比的性能差异相当大。降级到 RTX 4080或 4070 SKU预计将分别影响GPU性能15%至20%和40%至50%。因此,爱好者可能希望避免使用移动RTX 4070,因为从移动RTX 4080到移动RTX 4070的性能下降比从移动RTX 4090到移动RTX 4080的下降大得多。
在性能模式下运行,而不是在涡轮模式下运行,对性能略有影响。在性能模式下进行的Fire Strike 测试将导致图形得分下降4%至5%。我们下面的压力测试部分将进一步探讨这两种模式。
3DMark 11 Performance | 46484 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 43163 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 20295 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (268 - 378, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (230 - 302, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (168 - 233, n=9) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (141.1 - 189.4, n=14) | |
2560x1440 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (103.4 - 137.8, n=14) | |
3840x2160 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (53.3 - 73.7, n=12) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD FSR | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K FSR | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 185 | 180.4 | 175.2 | 112.6 | 114.8 | 170.5 | ||||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 490.1 | 405.6 | 370.3 | 203.8 | 154.8 | |||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 165.6 | 150.5 | 154.2 | 139 | 135.4 | |||||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 214 | 205 | 163.9 | 151 | 93.3 | |||||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 132.2 | 118 | 94.3 | 78.5 | ||||||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 157 | 145 | 142 | 108 | ||||||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 238 | 228 | 190 | 104 | ||||||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 121.4 | |||||||||
Valorant (2020) | 485 | |||||||||
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 187 | 169 | 135 | 79 | ||||||
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 117 | 112 | 109 | 82 | ||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 146.4 | 140.5 | 132.6 | 133.8 | 104.3 | 48.6 | ||||
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 267.7 | 230 | 194.6 | 176.2 | 134.2 | 71.9 | ||||
F1 22 (2022) | 266 | 243 | 221 | 116.3 | 92.1 | 45.8 | ||||
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 188 | 180 | 135 | 82 | ||||||
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 105.6 | 103.1 | 88.4 | 43 | ||||||
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 153 | 117 | 93 | 41 | 43 | 24 | ||||
Final Fantasy XVI (2024) | 91.6 | 71.2 | 77.5 | |||||||
God of War Ragnarök (2024) | 138 | 127.1 | 113.9 | 82.8 | ||||||
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 130 | 126 | 92 | 76 | 72 | 76 | ||||
Stalker 2 (2024) | 64.2 | 113.2 | 58.6 | 78.2 | 38.9 |
排放 - 性能比涡轮更安静
系统噪音
无论在什么性能设置下,风扇噪音都在23至27 dB(A)之间,而静音背景为22.7 dB(A)。值得庆幸的是,这个范围足够安静,基本上不会被人察觉,而且在运行稍高的负载(如网络浏览或流媒体)时,风扇在保持低于30分贝(A)方面做得很好。
性能模式下的游戏比涡轮模式下更安静。在性能模式下运行时的风扇噪音 Witcher 3在性能模式下的风扇噪音约为46.4分贝(A),而在涡轮模式下则为51.4至54分贝(A)。因此,用户可能希望用5%的图形性能缺陷来换取性能模式的更安静的噪音水平。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 27.7 / 27.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 30.5 / 54.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.7 dB(A) |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Aorus 17X XES GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -10% | -9% | -24% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 22.7 | 23.4 -3% | 25.2 -11% | 25 -10% | 26 -15% | 23 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 24.2 -3% | 28 -19% | 26 -11% | 28 -19% | 23 2% |
Idle Average * | 27.7 | 25.6 8% | 28 -1% | 29 -5% | 32 -16% | 28.11 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.7 | 31 -12% | 30.4 -10% | 30 -8% | 38 -37% | 28.11 -1% |
Load Average * | 30.5 | 43.3 -42% | 41 -34% | 46 -51% | 53 -74% | 30.62 -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.4 | 56.3 -10% | 50.7 1% | 46 11% | 54 -5% | 49.75 3% |
Load Maximum * | 54.1 | 59.1 -9% | 52.6 3% | 47 13% | 55 -2% | 50.17 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘和掌托的大部分地方在游戏时保持凉爽。热点反而是沿着甲板的边缘,手指不太可能接触的地方。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 20.8 °C / 69.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+8.1 °C / 14.6 F).
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Aorus 17X XES Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -13% | -13% | -18% | -46% | -29% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 34.6 | 37.4 -8% | 39 -13% | 42 -21% | 54 -56% | 53 -53% |
Maximum Bottom * | 35.6 | 45 -26% | 44 -24% | 41 -15% | 58 -63% | 56 -57% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.2 | 29.8 -10% | 31 -14% | 33 -21% | 37 -36% | 30 -10% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 32.4 -8% | 29.8 1% | 34 -13% | 39 -30% | 29 3% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试--温暖的核心温度
当在Prime95下受压时,CPU将在4.2和4.9GHz之间循环,同时将CPU的封装功率保持在114W和128W之间。然而,核心温度将非常高,超过90C。
当运行在性能模式下时,GPU时钟速率、内存时钟、温度和电路板功耗将分别稳定在2055 MHz、2250 MHz、79 C和149 W。 Witcher 3在性能模式下运行。当设置为Turbo模式时,这些数值将改变为2280 MHz、2275 MHz、74 C和170 W。因此,如果你想接近宣传的移动RTX 4090的175 W TGP,就需要涡轮模式。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 53 | 36 |
Prime95压力 | 4.2 - 4.9 | - | 90 - 94 | 51 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 4.2 - 4.8 | ~850 - 1545 | 94 | 58 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | ~3.2 | 2055 | 97 | 79 |
Witcher 3 压力(涡轮模式) | ~1.1 | 2280 | 88 | 74 |
发言人
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--有需求的机器
消耗功率
我们的2023型号通常比英特尔驱动的2022型号更耗电。例如,当运行Prime95时,功耗将稳定在205瓦,而去年的i9-12950HX配置只有117瓦。同样地,运行 Witcher 3将比旧的RTX 3080 Ti配置多消耗约24%的电力。性能可能比原来更快,但消耗也随之上升。
我们能够从大型(约18.4 x 8.4 x 3.6厘米)的330瓦交流适配器中记录到280瓦的最大消耗。
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 3.8 Watt |
Idle | 14.5 / 21.1 / 42.8 Watt |
Load |
116.7 / 279.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 3840x2160, 17" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -1% | 13% | -9% | 23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 14.5 | 16.1 -11% | 14 3% | 15 -3% | 18 -24% | 13 10% |
Idle Average * | 21.1 | 24 -14% | 19.3 9% | 20 5% | 28 -33% | 16.5 22% |
Idle Maximum * | 42.8 | 34 21% | 36.8 14% | 29 32% | 36 16% | 17 60% |
Load Average * | 116.7 | 123.6 -6% | 117.2 -0% | 121 -4% | 153 -31% | 93 20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 278 | 286 -3% | 304 -9% | 179.8 35% | 221 21% | 239 14% |
Load Maximum * | 279.6 | 285.7 -2% | 342.5 -22% | 246 12% | 290 -4% | 251 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
在Optimus和iGPU处于激活状态的平衡模式下,WLAN运行时间约为平均4小时。其他17英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 ROG Strix G17 G713PI或Aorus 17X XES将返回类似的结果。
该系统可以通过第三方USB-C适配器进行充电。然而,一些适配器可能无法工作;我们的135瓦联想USB-C充电器可以毫无问题地工作,而我们的130瓦戴尔XPS USB-C充电器则根本无法充电。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 46% | 23% | 3% | 7% | 17% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 248 | 363 46% | 305 23% | 255 3% | 266 7% | 290 17% |
Reader / Idle | 439 | |||||
Load | 89 | 58 | 86 | 107 | ||
H.264 | 166 | 226 | 294 | |||
Witcher 3 ultra | 64 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 性能卓越,外观老化
对于2022年,AMD和Nvidia推出了Zen 3+和移动GeForce 30 Ti系列,分别取代了2021年的Zen 3和非Ti选项。然而,这些升级被证明是相对较小的,因为较新的选项在架构层面上没有带来任何新东西。对于2023年,Zen 4和移动GeForce RTX 40系列终于带来了笔记本电脑玩家一直在等待的重大性能升级。功耗可能会更高,但马力的增加弥补了这一点,特别是Ryzen 9 7945HX比竞争性的13代酷睿i9-13950HX既稍快又更省电。
2023年的ROG Strix Scar 17展示了Ryzen 9 7945HX和GeForce RTX 4090的最佳状态。然而,一些外部设计特征可能需要更新。
虽然今年的处理器令人印象深刻,但ROG Strix Scar 17的整体外部设计可以使用更大的更新。例如,游戏时的CPU温度比预期的要高,而PCIe4 x4固态硬盘在重度使用几分钟后就会节流。小的数字键盘和方向键仍然很拥挤,键盘上的一些次要标签在背光激活时仍然不亮。一些竞争机型,如更薄的 微星GE78也已经转为16:10,而Strix Scar 17系列仍然是16:9。这款机型有可能很快看起来和感觉到陈旧,尽管它的性能并不缓慢。
价格和可用性
测试模型的名称价格和可用性,如果必要的话,偏离相关设备的变体。从链接窗口的列表中链接到一个商店。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
- 04/10/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.