Notebookcheck Logo

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 评测--配备高精度手写笔的创意平板电脑

模型尺寸。

MatePad Pro 13.2 不仅拥有超大显示屏，还首次配备了采用 NearLink 技术的触控笔，有望在精度和延迟方面有显著提升。此外，MatePad Pro 还支持 HDR 和六个扬声器，娱乐功能同样不容忽视。全能型产品？
Android Touchscreen Tablet

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 可以说是继 MatePad Pro 11或 MatePad Pro 12.6但顾名思义，它的显示屏增大了，因此实际上属于不同的类别。

MatePad Pro 13.2 的起价为 999 欧元（12/256 GB，黑色），仅平板电脑一款。存储容量更大的 512 GB 版本（绿色）还提供键盘盖：1,199 欧元。

最大的未知数是 SoC。华为几乎没有透露任何关于 麒麟 9000W因此，我们也对其进行了仔细研究。

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (MatePad Pro Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W 12 x 1.5 - 2.5 GHz
Graphics adapter
HiSilicon Maleoon 910
Memory
12 GB 
Display
13.20 inch 3:2, 2880 x 1920 pixel 262 PPI, Capacitive, native pen support, OLED, 10 Bit, reflection-resistant magnetron nano-optics coating, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 490.34 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, NearLink
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.5 x 289.1 x 196.1
Battery
38.89 Wh, 5050 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 7.7 V
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Huawei HarmonyOS
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/1.8, AF) + 8 MPix (Ultra wide, f/2.2), LED-Flash, Camera2-API-Level: Limited
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.2) + dToF
Additional features
Speakers: six, Keyboard: OnScreen, Charger, USB-Cabel, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1), SBAS; DRM Widevine L1, HDR: HLG, HDR10, fanless
Weight
580 g
Price
999 Euro
Links
Huawei homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89.6 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910		580 g5.5 mm13.20"2880x1920
90.6 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		732 g5.5 mm14.60"2960x1848
91.8 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2, M2 10-Core GPU		682 g6.4 mm12.90"2732x2048
85.2 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Lenovo Tab P12
Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4		615 g6.9 mm12.70"2944x1840

案例 - 华为超薄平板电脑

尽管显示屏很大，华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 的厚度却只有 5.5 毫米，而且轻得出奇。92% 的屏占比也证明这款平板电脑的边缘非常窄。

我们非常喜欢 MatePad 的制造质量。缝隙既紧密又均匀，扭动时外壳依然坚固，甚至没有一点吱吱作响的感觉。

华为平板电脑没有任何 IP 认证，有黑色和绿色两种颜色可供选择。

键盘盖的最大倾斜角度

尺寸比较

❌
326.4 mm 208.6 mm 5.5 mm 732 g293.37 mm 190.76 mm 6.9 mm 615 g289.1 mm 196.1 mm 5.5 mm 580 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 6.4 mm 682 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能 - MatePad Pro 13.2 提供 USB 3.2 接口

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 使用 USB 3.2 端口（Gen.1），在连接 M2.SSD（三星 980 Pro）的拷贝测试中，速度达到了 327.55 MB/s，并支持有线图像输出。后者只镜像屏幕，平板电脑没有桌面模式。连接的存储驱动器支持 FAT32、NTFS 和 exFAT 文件系统。

无法进行内存扩展。但支持蓝牙 5.2 和 NearLink。

上图：音量、麦克风（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
上图：音量、麦克风（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左：扬声器、USB、扬声器（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左：扬声器、USB、扬声器（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
右：扬声器、电源（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
右：扬声器、电源（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
底部（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
底部（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）

软件 - 配备 HarmonyOS 4.0 的华为平板电脑

通过 HarmonyOS 4.0，MatePad Pro 13.2 依赖于华为自己的操作系统，该系统基于Android 12。这里没有预装谷歌服务甚至 Play Store。华为没有提供更新持续时间或更新计划的准确信息。不过，经验表明，制造商会在几年内为其高端产品发布这些更新。例如 Mate 30 Pro就运行着最新的 HarmonyOS 4.0。在测试时，该平板电脑的安全补丁截至 2023 年 12 月 1 日，因此仍然是最新的。

如果在 AppGallery 中找不到已知的应用程序，可以通过花瓣搜索从相应的在线网站将其安装为 APK。这种方法现在效果不错，但无法对文件进行全面检查。另一个选择是 GBox，它使用沙盒欺骗谷歌，使其认为这是小米智能手机，并允许完全访问 Play Store。大多数应用程序的运行也相当可靠，但我们也遇到了一些问题，例如跟踪应用程序有时无法确定位置。此外，应用程序在 GBox 中启动速度明显变慢，而且该解决方案在数据保护方面也存在问题。

应用图库

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 既没有 6 GHz 无线局域网，也没有蜂窝电话选项

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 支持 Wi-Fi 6，但没有快速的 6 GHz 频段。结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，它在发送数据时仍能实现较高且稳定的数据传输速率，但接收速度却出奇地慢。不过，在日常使用中，只有在数据量较大时才会明显感觉到这一点。

与 Mate 60 Pro一样，MatePad Pro 13.2 也使用了 NearLink 无线技术，其工作方式与 UWB 类似。这是一种短距离无线技术，但比蓝牙或 Wi-Fi 更安全、更经济、更快速。传输延迟仅为 20 微秒，数据传输率是传统蓝牙连接的六倍。NearLink 是可选 M-Pencil 的基础。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab P12
814 (759min - 840max) MBit/s +86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
738 (702min - 792max) MBit/s +68%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
442 (222min - 528max) MBit/s +1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
438 (339min - 476max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
990 (465min - 1032max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
952 (490min - 980max) MBit/s -4%
Lenovo Tab P12
928 (909min - 950max) MBit/s -6%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
486 (175min - 591max) MBit/s -51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
747 (145min - 917max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
702 (225min - 834max) MBit/s
055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø747 (145-917)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø694 (225-834)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, HiSilicon Maleoon 910; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø437 (339-476)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø442 (222-528)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, HiSilicon Maleoon 910; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø975 (465-1032)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø486 (175-591)
GPS 测试：建筑物内
楼内
GPS 测试：户外
室外

在建筑物内，使用 MatePad Pro 13.2 进行 Satfix 定位需要更长的时间，定位有时会偏离实际位置。但在室外，华为平板电脑却能提供稳定的信号。

在一次自行车旅行中，我们将 MatePad 与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较，虽然平板电脑的定位精度不高，但仍能很好地完成导航任务。

全球导航卫星系统测试：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试：总结

摄像头 - MatePad Pro 13.2 的三个镜头

与华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 自拍
与华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 自拍

虽然前置摄像头提供了相当高的分辨率，但图像的细节略显不足，只能拍摄 30 FPS 的全高清视频。它由 ToF 光学系统提供支持，能够实现非常好的人物跟踪，还能检测到是否有人在看平板电脑，并在必要时将其唤醒。自拍当然不是这里的重点，而是视频电话。

背面有两个镜头。除了主摄像头外，华为还提供了一个额外的超广角镜头。这两个镜头的成像质量都相当一般。在光线良好的情况下，它们能拍摄出适合记录的照片，但仅此而已。

视频最多只能以超高清（30 FPS）格式录制。如果您觉得全高清已经足够，也可以使用 60 FPS 和超广角。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
4.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
0 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2: 5.66 ∆E min: 0 - max: 10.8 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.7 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2: 47.31 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 92.93 ∆E

配件和保修 - 长达三年的保修

MatePad Pro 13.2 的配件
MatePad Pro 13.2 的配件

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 的供货范围名义上仅限于一个 88 瓦的模块化电源装置，其中有一个 USB-A 端口和一个 USB-C 端口，以及一条 USB 电缆（Type-A 转 Type-C）。如果您选择存储空间更大的版本，还将获得配套的键盘。M-Pencil（Gen 3，99 欧元）必须作为选件购买，但在华为商店购买（截止到 2024 年 2 月 29 日）时可免费获得。

华为还提供可选的蓝牙鼠标、键盘（199 欧元）和小型扩展坞。

华为在德国为 MatePad Pro 13.2 提供 24 个月的保修服务。作为市场推广活动的一部分，保修期免费延长至 3 年。

输入设备和操作 - 带有 NearLink 功能的 M-Pencil 与众不同

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 的电容式触摸屏工作非常稳定，具有令人愉悦的滑动特性。不过，只有配合 M-Pencil 才能充分发挥其潜力。华为 MatePad Pro 是首款使用 NearLink 的产品，因此其延迟时间明显低于Apple 或三星的产品。此外，它的压力级别超过 10,000 级，是竞争对手的两倍多。这使得 MatePad Pro 在技术上成为创意专业人士的首选。

笔可以通过磁力锁定在上长边缘。它可以非常牢固地固定在那里，也可以在那里充电。

寻找合适的软件是个大问题。虽然华为提供了一个功能强大的工具，有自己的笔记应用程序，也支持笔的许多附加功能，但它缺乏一个功能强大的图像编辑应用程序。实际上，中国市场已经有了这样的应用。不过，它是否会在世界其他地区推出还有待观察。

在生物识别安全方面，华为完全依靠前置摄像头进行面部识别，最多可保存 5 个面部轮廓。然而，华为为什么不使用 ToF 进行安全的 3D 识别，对我们来说仍然是个谜。

遗憾的是，华为平板电脑没有振动电机。不过，通过声音也可以更好地强调按键。选配的键盘给人留下了非常好的印象：1.7 x 1.7 毫米的按键键程相当柔和，发出的咔哒声也很小声，只有空格键和回车键的声音稍大。宽大的触摸板尺寸为 120 x 72 毫米，具有非常好的滑动性能，还支持手势操作。亮点蓝牙键盘不直接与平板电脑对接时也可以使用。

微软 SwiftKey 和 Celia 预装为屏幕键盘。前者提供更广泛的功能，但不适合 MatePad Pro 13.2 的屏幕。

西莉亚
西莉亚
SwiftKey
SwiftKey
SwiftKey
SwiftKey
可选键盘的键盘布局
可选键盘的键盘布局

显示屏 - 明亮，但比预期暗一些

子像素结构
子像素结构

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 的一大亮点无疑是 13.2 英寸 OLED 显示屏。它的刷新率高达 144 Hz。在显示 HDR 内容时，亮度最高可达 1,000 cd/m²。

采用全白显示屏和主动式环境光传感器后，平均亮度将攀升至 803 cd/m²。然而，APL18（850 cd/m²）和 HDR 测量（874 cd/m²）很难达到更高的数值，这意味着与指定的峰值亮度相差甚远。如果手动调节显示屏，最高亮度可达 636 cd/m²。

华为采用 1,440 Hz 的 PWM 调光技术，尽可能使面板更舒适。这意味着显示屏名义上可以说是无闪烁的（> 1,400 Hz），即使是敏感人群也不会感到任何不适。

812
cd/m²		796
cd/m²		783
cd/m²
811
cd/m²		806
cd/m²		774
cd/m²
824
cd/m²		831
cd/m²		793
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 831 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 803.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.07 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 806 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
OLED, 2880x1920, 13.2"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.6"		Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9"		Lenovo Tab P12
LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
Screen
-49%
-37%
-47%
Brightness middle
806
621
-23%
611
-24%
435
-46%
Brightness
803
620
-23%
605
-25%
407
-49%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
92
-1%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.58
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
1.9
-111%
1.4
-56%
1.5
-67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.9
4.6
-142%
3.3
-74%
3.2
-68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.6
-0%
2.3
-44%
2.4
-50%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.12 104%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
CCT
6699 97%
6602 98%
6930 94%
6546 99%
Contrast
750

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1428 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 1428 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 1428 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

虽然色彩显示可以在设置中调整，但出厂设置已经非常不错了。肉眼无法看到色彩差异。

灰度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.566 ms rise
↘ 0.5095 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7385 ms rise
↘ 1.039 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 在户外给人留下了良好的印象。这不仅得益于高亮度，还得益于减少反光的磁控纳米光学涂层。

即使在平视角度下，可视角度的稳定性也非常好。亮度降低幅度很小，但可以看到非常细微的黄雾。

户外活动
户外活动
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 配备麒麟 9000W 处理器的华为平板电脑

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 配备了 海思麒麟 9000W可支持 12GB RAM。遗憾的是，华为并未透露有关 SoC 的更多细节。CPU 由十二个内核组成：省电集群有四个 ARM Cortex-A510 内核，每个内核的工作频率高达 1,530 MHz，其他六个单元使用来自海思（0x0D42）的未指定内核，工作频率高达 2,150 MHz。第三个集群包含两个海思内核（0x0D02），每个内核的最高频率为 2,487 MHz。

如果提出高端要求，单核性能也会相应参差不齐，因为这相当于一个 Apple A12.由于核心数量众多，多核性能看起来更好，麒麟处理器的性能高于 骁龙 7 代 1或 密度 8020.这是一款性能不错的中端产品，但与售价约为 1000 欧元的平板电脑相比并不尽如人意。

在系统基准测试中，MatePad Pro 13.2 也明显不如 iPad Pro或 Tab S9 Ultra.不过，HarmonyOS 在日常使用中非常流畅，即使在多任务处理时也是如此。

虽然也没有关于内存的详细信息，但分析表明它一定是非常快的 UFS 3.1 内存。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | AImark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
1890 Points +118%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
1598 Points +84%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (867 - 1006, n=3)
946 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
867 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
738 Points -15%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
8524 Points +120%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
4989 Points +29%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
3878 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (3694 - 3951, n=3)
3841 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2494 Points -36%
Lenovo Tab P12
1973 Points -49%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
2079 Points +77%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (1174 - 1343, n=4)
1248 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
1174 Points
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)
1111 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab P12
958 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
5534 Points +35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (3987 - 4370, n=4)
4109 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
4088 Points
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)
3544 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab P12
2422 Points -41%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
1416727 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
1112212 Points +70%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (655341 - 714538, n=2)
684940 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
655341 Points
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)
469872 Points -28%
Lenovo Tab P12
442871 Points -32%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
15983 Points +50%
Lenovo Tab P12
12131 Points +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (10620 - 13858, n=4)
12057 Points +14%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
10620 Points
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9847 Points -7%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
1584 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
1263 Points +51%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (834 - 1028, n=4)
927 Points +11%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
834 Points
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
773 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab P12
682 Points -18%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
8784 Points +51%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (5821 - 6464, n=4)
6238 Points +7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
5821 Points
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4205 Points -28%
Lenovo Tab P12
4158 Points -29%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Points -100%
System
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (10428 - 10785, n=4)
10571 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
10428 Points
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7265 Points -30%
Lenovo Tab P12
6610 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
1374 Points -87%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
8738 Points +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (7687 - 8362, n=4)
8118 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
8069 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
5807 Points -28%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4862 Points -40%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
31738 Points +192%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (10876 - 12763, n=4)
12155 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
10876 Points
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9168 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab P12
4975 Points -54%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
1584 Points +26%
Lenovo Tab P12
1566 Points +25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (1255 - 1582, n=4)
1479 Points +18%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
1255 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)
7290 Points +876%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
1273 Points +70%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (738 - 927, n=4)
828 Points +11%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
747 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
456 Points -39%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
15986 Points +47%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
13069 Points +20%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11323 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
10874 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (10373 - 11155, n=4)
10812 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P12
5315 Points -51%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Average of class Tablet (137 - 4617, n=8, last 2 years)
1014 Points +17%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
863 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ()
863 Points 0%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Tablet (66 - 6806, n=8, last 2 years)
1160 Points +471%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
203 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ()
203 Points 0%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (112 - 834, n=6, last 2 years)
380 Points +36%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
279 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ()
279 Points 0%

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, HiSilicon Maleoon 910, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, ARM Mali-G78 MP22, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
 
Average of class Tablet

图形处理器为 马龙 910麒麟 9000S 也采用了类似的设计。华为在这方面也只是处于中端水平，根据不同的基准测试，其性能相当于 Adreno 640, 650或 Mali-G77 MP9.

这在游戏时也很明显。虽然在《PUBG Mobile》中可以使用 Ultra 设置，但在高清模式下帧数下降明显，尽管游戏完全没有卡顿。Asphalt 9》在启动后立即崩溃，这也是我们恢复使用旧版《Asphalt 8》的原因。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6909 Points +571%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3489 Points +239%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1805 Points +75%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1030 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
611 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6919 Points +558%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3563 Points +239%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1863 Points +77%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1051 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
623 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
25317 Points +569%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14789 Points +291%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6399 Points +69%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3785 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2237 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6259 Points +59%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3941 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2156 Points -45%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14098 Points +123%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9630 Points +52%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6333 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4307 Points -32%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24172 Points +269%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12079 Points +85%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6544 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4301 Points -34%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5748 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5690 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5633 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4307 Points -24%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps +2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps -17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
873 fps +223%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
421 fps +56%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
270 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
232 fps -14%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps -63%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps +126%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +98%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps +15%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
494 fps +289%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps +78%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps +21%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
115 fps +248%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps +130%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +76%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
340 fps +237%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
169 fps +67%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps +11%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
89 fps +424%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps +182%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps +141%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
214 fps +410%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps +167%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +52%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
70 fps +400%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps +179%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +114%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
90 fps +329%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 fps +133%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +48%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
89 fps +287%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps +130%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +91%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
241 fps +316%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +105%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps +31%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -50%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
48 fps +445%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps +173%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8.8 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps -47%

Basemark GPUScore

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø11.3 (5.62-17.3)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø8.26 (4.68-246)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø96 (59.5-120.1)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø7.86 (4-12)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø6.01 (3.34-275)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø67.4 (40.5-82.4)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.1: Ø3.56 (2.85-5.13)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø3.49 (1.405-6.71)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.1 : Ø36.6 (31-48.7)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.1: Ø2.5 (2.03-3.56)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø2.48 (1.157-4.5)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 1.0.1 : Ø33.6 (26.6-45.3)
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
225.315 Points +147%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
192.313 Points +111%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (89.5 - 155.8, n=4)
112.1 Points +23%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)
111.2 Points +22%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
91.258 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
75.924 Points -17%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
227 Points +129%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
151 Points +53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (85 - 160, n=4)
116 Points +17%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)
106.9 Points +8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
99 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
78 Points -21%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
342 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ()
200 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
183 Points
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
155.2 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
99 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
376 runs/min +454%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
191 runs/min +181%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
121.9 runs/min +80%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (62.7 - 208, n=3)
112.9 runs/min +66%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
78 runs/min +15%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
67.9 runs/min
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
74614 Points +120%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
62837 Points +85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (32134 - 46687, n=4)
37658 Points +11%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
33982 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
31245 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3734 ms * -211%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
1460.1 ms * -21%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
1202.4 ms *
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (836 - 1244, n=4)
1076 ms * +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
634.3 ms * +47%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
450.9 ms * +62%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 UltraLenovo Tab P12Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
5%
-51%
-4%
-26%
-56%
Sequential Read 256KB
2022.97
3367.33
66%
956.07
-53%
1983.47
-2%
1846 ?(1023 - 2023, n=27)
-9%
1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years)
-48%
Sequential Write 256KB
1875.6
1891.49
1%
776.24
-59%
1873.45
0%
1199 ?(575 - 1876, n=27)
-36%
686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years)
-63%
Random Read 4KB
386.3
449.37
16%
241.23
-38%
374.54
-3%
282 ?(208 - 386, n=27)
-27%
189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years)
-51%
Random Write 4KB
502.59
174.32
-65%
234.58
-53%
446.71
-11%
338 ?(221 - 532, n=27)
-33%
189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years)
-62%

Games FPS

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2; Asphalt 8: Airborne; very low; 7.5.0i: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2; Asphalt 8: Airborne; high; 7.5.0i: Ø29.9 (27-31)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.0.0: Ø58.7 (49-61)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.6 (36-40)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2; World of Tanks Blitz; 10.6.0.671: Ø59.2 (27-63)

排放--MatePad Pro 13.2 的六个强劲扬声器

温度

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 的表面温度在任何负载情况下都绝对无害，SoC 始终能充分发挥其性能。

Max. Load
 31.4 °C38.4 °C37.2 °C 
 30 °C31.9 °C32.8 °C 
 30 °C31.2 °C30.1 °C 
Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 32.6 °C
33.8 °C37.6 °C32.3 °C
30.9 °C31.7 °C30.9 °C
28.5 °C29.3 °C28.6 °C
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 31.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.5 (23.4-23.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60.8 (56.7-76)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø97.9 (82.8-119)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.9 (12.9-12.9)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.29 (6.28-6.32)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.4 (18.2-23.4)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.8 (27.1-41.5)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.71 (3.7-3.72)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø22.6 (22.5-22.7)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø124.5 (113.6-152.4)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab P12
99.4 (3.7min - 3.72max) % 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
99.3 (6.28min - 6.32max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
77.6 (18.2min - 23.4max) % -22%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
65.1 (27.1min - 41.5max) % -34%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P12
99.7 (12.9min - 12.9max) % +1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
99.1 (23.4min - 23.6max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
74.7 (56.7min - 76max) % -25%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
69.6 (82.8min - 119max) % -30%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
99.5 (22.5min - 22.7max) %
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
74.6 (113.6min - 152.4max) % -25%

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, HiSilicon Maleoon 910, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

发言人

名义上的六个扬声器实际上由两个多驱动器阵列组成，每个阵列有三个驱动器。这些扬声器提供了迷人的立体声音效，甚至还能产生真正的低音。只是中音有些过于强劲，所以高音有些过于微弱。不过总的来说，MatePad Pro 13.2 的扬声器音效确实不错。

USB-C 可用于有线声音输出，通过蓝牙可实现无线声音输出，但遗憾的是只支持非常有限的编解码器（SBC、AAC 和 LDAC）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.236.52530.726.43125.624.44026.729.65036.741.76324.631.98017.645.510018.753.712518.261.116015.966.820017.367.825015.267.231514.171.140013.470.750013.87763014.376.480013.777.3100012.480125012.781.5160012.178.5200012.975.4250012.577.4315012.267.4400012.870.6500013.172.5630013.569.8800013.167.11000013.766.51250014691600013.366.1SPL25.288N0.776.6median 13.5median 70.7Delta1.24.937.532.426.324.423.721.635.924.8363724.927.420.441.318.546.616.956.717.964.71663.314.165.112.269.613.366.510.973.512.37312.173.812.573.111.872.611.970.912.472.112.87113.1701374.913.274.713.670.613.671.113.770146713.854.12584.30.665.8median 13.2median 70.61.63.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--只需按一下按钮，即可为 88W 充电

耗电量

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 的功耗处于合理水平，但三星特别表明，闲置时也可以更高效地工作。

华为平板电脑的充电功率可达 88 瓦（涡轮增压），但必须通过点击屏幕上充电动画的气泡来激活，否则 MatePad只能以 40 瓦（超级充电）的功率充电。乍听起来很复杂，但这是完全合理的，因为在隔夜充电时，40 瓦的功率对电池的影响要小得多。在全功率状态下，平板电脑只需要一个多小时就能充满电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.19 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.58 / 7.67 / 7.77 Watt
Load midlight 11.86 / 11.88 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
5050 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
11200 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
10702 mAh		Lenovo Tab P12
10200 mAh
Power Consumption
9%
-23%
8%
Idle Minimum *
3.58
3.17
11%
2.54
29%
1.91
47%
Idle Average *
7.67
3.68
52%
11.24
-47%
7.94
-4%
Idle Maximum *
7.77
3.91
50%
11.48
-48%
8.12
-5%
Load Average *
11.86
15.83
-33%
12.97
-9%
10.68
10%
Load Maximum *
11.88
15.84
-33%
16.6
-40%
12.69
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W: Ø8.19 (3.43-11.9)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2: Ø9.71 (3.73-16.7)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.22 (7.46-9.69)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.7 (16.5-16.7)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.15 (4.04-4.66)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.67 (4.29-4.84)

电池寿命

华为 MatePad 13.2 的电池由两块电池组成，总容量为 38.89 Wh。为了便于比较，华为在此表示电池容量为 10,100 mAh。因此，这款平板电脑的电池容量与竞争对手相近。

这一点也反映在运行时间上，因为这里的比较领域非常接近。不过，在实际的 WLAN 测试（150 cd/m²）中，MatePad Pro 13.2 根据使用的浏览器不同，测试结果也大相径庭。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 120)
10h 47min
WiFi Websurfing (Huawei Browser 14)
8h 07min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 (sort by value)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
5050 mAh
647 min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
11200 mAh
623 min
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
10702 mAh
671 min
Lenovo Tab P12
10200 mAh
675 min

Pros

+ 出色的笔输入
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 长达三年的保修期
+ 快速充电
+ 友好的 144 Hz 面板...

Cons

- ......然而，它并不像承诺的那样明亮
- 只有中档性能
- 只能选配笔
- 无 6 GHz 无线局域网
- 软件范围有限

结论--功能强大的平板电脑，但也有绊脚石

评测中：华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 测试设备由华为德国公司提供。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
评测中：华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 测试设备由华为德国公司提供。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 是一款非常出色的平板电脑。当需要精确、低延迟的工作时，基于近场通信的全新 M-Pencil 尤其能发挥巨大作用。选配的键盘绝对是同类产品中的佼佼者，使这款平板电脑成为一个全面的工作解决方案。

在显示屏方面，虽然在 HDR 播放中没有达到承诺的 1,000 cd/m²，有点令人讨厌，但除此之外，它还是一款非常适合眼睛且均衡的显示屏。

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 的整体配置非常吸引人，最大的不足是软件方面的欠缺。

华为不得不忍受的最大批评是内置的 SoC。虽然它为系统的流畅运行提供了足够的性能，但在我们看来，对于一款售价高达四位数的平板电脑来说，它的性能实在是太弱了。 麒麟 9000W更属于中端产品。

在这一点上，谷歌服务的缺失也值得一提。虽然 AppGallery 也提供了许多应用程序，但也存在很大的不足。尤其是在创意领域，缺少大腕。通过 Petal Search 或 GBox 进行交叉安装是可行的，但始终存在安全和数据保护风险。

如果你正在寻找一款用于创意用途的平板电脑，那么华为在技术上是无可替代的。MatePad Pro 13.2 在媒体播放方面也非常强大，作为办公设备也非常理想。因此，如果你不需要谷歌服务，并且可以通过第三方平台安装应用程序，那么你可以毫不犹豫地使用它。

支持谷歌服务的替代产品主要有 Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra但也有便宜得多的 联想 Tab P12如果您主要追求大显示屏的话。Apple iPad Pro 12.9是终极之选。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

在测试期间，MatePad Pro 13.2 只能从华为商店（德国）直接购买。

在上市之初（至 2024 年 2 月 29 日），每位购买者都将免费获得 M-Pencil、键盘和三年延保服务。

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 - 02/16/2024 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
67 / 80 → 84%
Pointing Device
98%
Connectivity
61 / 70 → 86%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 87%
Battery
89%
Display
93%
Games Performance
58 / 78 → 75%
Application Performance
89 / 92 → 97%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
86 / 91 → 94%
Camera
54 / 85 → 64%
Average
81%
90%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 评测--配备高精度手写笔的创意平板电脑
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-02-21 (Update: 2024-08-15)