Medion S10 OLED 评测：配备 OLED 面板和酷睿 7 处理器的多媒体笔记本电脑

Name: Medion S10 OLED
Brand: Medion

慢慢来

Medion 的 S10 是一款超薄多媒体笔记本电脑，配备 Meteor Lake、16 GB 内存和生动的 OLED 面板（4k、DCI-P3、16 英寸），纵横比为 16:10。值得称赞：它的内存可以更换/升级。整套设备售价约为 1,400 美元。

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/31/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Arc Intel Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Windows

Medion 的 S10 OLED 是一款轻薄小巧的多媒体笔记本电脑，尺寸为 16 英寸。它配备 Core Ultra 7 155H、16 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和对比度丰富的 OLED 显示屏。竞争对手包括 Apple MacBook Air 15, 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9, 三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16, 小米 RedmiBook Pro 16 2024和三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 16.

Test device courtesy of Medion DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Medion S10 OLED

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Core: 2250 MHz, Dual-Channel, 31.0.101.5593

Memory

16 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, Samsung SDC4174, OLED, DCI-P3, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH

Storage

Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7, 1024 GB

, 864 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC269

Connections

5 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset combined port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, TPM 2.0

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.8 x 355 x 245

Battery

70 Wh, 6065 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.59 kg, Power Supply: 500 g

Price

1299 Euro

Links

Medion homepage
Medion notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
76.7 %	v8	07 / 2024	Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.6 kg	17.8 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.9 kg	17.5 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
80.2 %	v8	07 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1.5 kg	12.3 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
89.7 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.9 kg	15.9 mm	16.00"	3072x1920
88.9 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.5 kg	12.5 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
91.6 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	03 / 2024	Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU	1.5 kg	11.5 mm	15.60"	2880x1664

请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息请点击此处.

外壳和连接性 - S10 没有 USB 4

Medion 将 S10 的技术融入了紧凑、时尚的金属外壳（铝镁合金）和纤薄的边框中。所采用的配色（深灰-烟灰-黑）凸显了这款笔记本电脑的严肃外观。该设备制造精良，重约 1.6 千克，与同类产品相当。其稳定性和刚度都不错。盖子的最大开启角度约为 160 度。

它共有 5 个 USB 端口（3 个 USB-A、2 个 USB-C），遗憾的是，它们只能按照 USB 3.2 Gen 1 标准运行。像 S10 这样的设备至少应该为用户提供 USB 4 或 Thunderbolt 4 接口，至少在需要时可以使用外置 GPU。不过，它的 USB-C 端口支持 DP Alt-Mode 和 Power Delivery--我们试过了。因此，这款笔记本电脑总共提供三个视频输出接口（1x HDMI、2x DP）。

笔记本电脑的无线模块采用了 WiFi 6E 芯片（英特尔 AX211），整体数据传输率良好。内置网络摄像头（210 万像素）是一个非常标准的摄像头，但它的开关功能为其加分不少。缺少千兆以太网端口和读卡器。

尺寸比较

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Medion S10 OLED LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 DIN A4 ❌

左侧：电源连接、USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)、HDMI、2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C；Power Delivery、DP Alt-Mode)、音频组合

右侧：重置按钮、网络摄像头开关、2 个 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)、电缆锁插槽

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort	1698 (1601^min, 1625.07^P1 - 1722^max) MBit/s +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1656 (1459^min, 1468.28^P1 - 1743^max) MBit/s +41%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1625 (1307^min, 1314.54^P1 - 1751^max) MBit/s +38%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800	1588 (1549^min - 1614^max) MBit/s +35%
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1921, n=78, last 2 years)	1359 MBit/s +15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=238)	1233 MBit/s +5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1177 (955^min - 1409^max) MBit/s
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	823 (328^min - 1046^max) MBit/s -30%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	671 (610^min - 705^max) MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort	1756 (1717^min, 1719.9^P1 - 1808^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800	1749 (1685^min - 1765^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1666 (1613^min, 1621.7^P1 - 1691^max) MBit/s +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1666 (1617^min, 1623.96^P1 - 1687^max) MBit/s +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1651 (1601^min - 1666^max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia (709 - 1789, n=77, last 2 years)	1447 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=238)	1379 MBit/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	901 (877^min - 918^max) MBit/s -45%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	901 (728^min - 937^max) MBit/s -45%

Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1177 (955-1409)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1656 (1459-1743)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (1549-1614)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø671 (610-705)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (328-1046)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1625 (1307-1751)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1698 (1601-1722)

Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1650 (1601-1666)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1666 (1617-1687)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1748 (1685-1765)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø901 (877-918)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø900 (728-937)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1666 (1613-1691)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1756 (1717-1808)

ColorChecker Medion S10 OLED: 7.08 ∆E min: 3.23 - max: 13.62 ∆E

可持续性

设备的包装材料主要是纸板和纸张。塑料用量有限：电源装置装在一个透明袋中，笔记本电脑装在一个由回收 PET 制成的纤维袋中。纸板盖的内侧覆盖着一层薄薄的泡沫。您应该可以进行维护和修理工作--拆下底板后就可以接触到硬件。通过 Windows 更新功能，软件更新在未来几年内都会有保障。Medion 尚未在其网站上提供该笔记本电脑的任何驱动程序或软件。因此，我们建议备份恢复分区中的驱动程序文件夹。

输入设备 - S10 具有背光按键

Medion 在笔记本电脑上安装了带三列数字键盘的背光 Chiclet 键盘。它的凹面按键（键程短、压力点清晰）敲击起来感觉不错，但阻力可能会更大一些。键入时键盘不会前后摇晃。方向键和两个 "回车 "键非常小。相比之下，带有玻璃表面的多点触摸点击板则非常宽大（约 14 x 9.6 厘米）。

显示屏 - OLED、DCI-P3、16:10

16 英寸屏幕（3,840 x 2,400 像素）的宽高比为 16:10，具有 OLED 典型的短响应时间和出色的黑度。遗憾的是，反光的显示表面加上略高于目标值的亮度使 S10 主要局限于室内使用。室外阅读只能在阴凉处或阴天进行。我们的测量设备在所有亮度水平下都会出现屏幕闪烁（60 Hz）。这是由于面板的亮度控制造成的。


303 cd/m²	308 cd/m²	314 cd/m²
301 cd/m²	307 cd/m²	313 cd/m²
301 cd/m²	305 cd/m²	312 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Samsung SDC4174 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 314 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 307.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 307 cd/m²
Contrast: 30700:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.08
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.197

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Medion S10 OLED Samsung SDC4174, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16", 165 Hz	LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz	Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 IPS, 2880x1664, 15.6", 60 Hz
Display		-25%	-0%	-3%	-1%	-0%	-4%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9	63.3 -37%	99.5 0%	98.8 -1%	99.8 0%	99.5 0%	98.7 -1%
sRGB Coverage	100	95.2 -5%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	98.6	65.3 -34%	97.5 -1%	89.9 -9%	94.6 -4%	97.5 -1%	87.8 -11%
Response Times		-709%	138%	-1575%	-150%	138%	-1495%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	1.7 ?(0.9, 0.8)	15 ?(7.4, 7.6) -782%	0.64 ?(0.33, 0.31) 62%	39.2 ?(15.8, 18.4) -2206%	6 ?(3.5, 2.5) -253%	0.64 ?(0.33, 0.31) 62%	35.3 ?(16.4, 17.9) -1976%
Response Time Black / White *	1.4 ?(0.7, 0.7)	10.3 ?(5.6, 4.7) -636%	0.68 ?(0.38, 0.3) 51%	14.6 ?(4.4, 10.2) -943%	14 ?(10.5, 3.5) -900%	0.68 ?(0.38, 0.3) 51%	15.6 ?(5.2, 10.4) -1014%
PWM Frequency	60 ?(100)		240 ?(100) 300%		481 702%	240 ?(100) 300%
Screen		-383%	18%	-418%	18%	18%	-393%
Brightness middle	307	368 20%	385 25%	520 69%	420 37%	385 25%	526 71%
Brightness	307	368 20%	391 27%	510 66%	421 37%	391 27%	506 65%
Brightness Distribution	96	91 -5%	97 1%	93 -3%	99 3%	97 1%	92 -4%
Black Level *	0.01	0.31 -3000%		0.35 -3400%	0.006 40%		0.37 -3600%
Contrast	30700	1187 -96%		1486 -95%	70000 128%		1422 -95%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.1	2.4 -14%	1.1 48%	2.9 -38%	1.66 21%	1.1 48%	1.4 33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.87	6.5 -33%	1.8 63%	6.2 -27%	4.92 -1%	1.8 63%	2 59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.08	0.8 62%		1.1 47%	3.39 -63%		0.6 71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	0.9	4.5 -400%	1.4 -56%	4.3 -378%	1.3 -44%	1.4 -56%	2.1 -133%
Gamma	2.197 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.24 ^98%	2.19 ^100%	2.27 ^97%	2.24 ^98%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6513 ^100%	6324 ^103%	6444 ^101%	7422 ^88%	6609 ^98%	6444 ^101%	6865 ^95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-372% / -353%	52% / 43%	-665% / -494%	-44% / -20%	52% / 43%	-631% / -467%

* ... smaller is better

色彩准确度已给出：三种常见的色彩空间（AdobeRGB、sRGB、DCI-P3）都能完全或几乎完全再现。显示器开箱即能呈现良好的色彩再现效果：偏差约为 2.1，达到了目标（DeltaE < 3）。校准不会带来任何改进。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7 ms rise
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.9 ms rise
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz
Amplitude: 90 %

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能--Meteor Lake 有时需要慢慢来

由于采用了 Meteor Lake 技术，这款轻薄的 16 英寸笔记本电脑可为办公和多媒体应用以及一些节俭型游戏提供足够的计算能力。这款测试设备的售价约为 1,400 美元。配备酷睿 i5-13420H(Raptor Lake）、512GB 固态硬盘和 QHD+ 显示屏（IPS）的机型价格约为 870 美元起。

测试条件

笔记本电脑不提供任何专有的性能配置文件。我们使用的是平衡配置文件（基准测试、电池测试）。我们无法确定不同配置文件之间的性能差异。

	最佳性能	平衡	最佳节能
功率限制 1 (HWInfo)	45 瓦	45 瓦	45 瓦
功率限制 2 (HWInfo)	60 瓦	60 瓦	60 瓦
噪音（CP 2077 Phantom）	-	42 dB (A)	-
性能（CP 2077 Phantom）	-	14 fps	-

处理器

酷睿至尊 7 155H 酷睿至尊 7 155H的 16 个 CPU 内核（6P、8E、2LPE；Meteor Lake）共有 22 个线程。CPU 对持续的多线程负载（CB15 循环）做出反应，不断提高性能。由此产生的基准值与 CPU 的平均值相当。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2345 (2300.97-2382.8)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2651 (2550.53-2701.61)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100: Ø1662 (1576.29-1694.92)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Max Cooling: Ø1797 (1605.27-2243.28)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1568 (1267.75-1932.27)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2016 (1825.4-2515.57)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	84.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	83.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	79 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	78.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia	78.2 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	76.6 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 ^-9! Apple M3	74.3 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	64.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ^-2! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	58.2 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17780 Points +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17401 Points +12%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15564 Points
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)	15387 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15171 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=47)	14916 Points -4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12708 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	10298 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	9410 Points -40%
Single Core
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	1900 Points +5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1801 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1777 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1759 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)	1757 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1755 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=47)	1726 Points -4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1569 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1287 Points -29%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6947 Points +13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6671 Points +8%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6164 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5865 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=45)	5791 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)	5683 Points -8%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4947 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	3555 Points -42%
CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	691 Points 0%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	691 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	670 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	667 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=45)	665 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)	652 Points -6%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	611 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	480 Points -31%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2745 (2259.12^min - 2745.18^max) Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2702 (2550.53^min - 2701.61^max) Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2516 (1825.4^min - 2515.57^max) Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=51)	2445 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)	2435 Points +2%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2383 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2243 (1605.27^min - 2243.28^max) Points -6%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1932 (1267.75^min - 1932.27^max) Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1695 (1576.29^min - 1694.92^max) Points -29%
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	268 Points +3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	259 Points
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)	257 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	256 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	254 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=47)	249 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	235 Points -9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	210 Points -19%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	99.6 Points -62%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	494 Seconds * -145%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	351 Seconds * -74%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	291 Seconds * -44%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)	253 Seconds * -25%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=43)	234 Seconds * -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	224 Seconds * -11%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	202 Seconds *
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	195 Seconds * +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	190 Seconds * +6%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68535 MIPS +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68254 MIPS +16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	61091 MIPS +4%
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)	60265 MIPS +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=45)	58973 MIPS 0%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	58874 MIPS
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	49667 MIPS -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	43764 MIPS -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)	5722 MIPS +3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5562 MIPS
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5496 MIPS -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5486 MIPS -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5458 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=45)	5343 MIPS -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	5242 MIPS -6%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5159 MIPS -7%

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	14646 Points +26%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13501 Points +17%
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 22544, n=62, last 2 years)	13411 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13291 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12422 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=50)	12279 Points +6%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	12066 Points +4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11646 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11581 Points
Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	3130 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2751 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=58, last 2 years)	2652 Points +8%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2464 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2459 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2440 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2414 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=47)	2378 Points -3%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2132 Points -13%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13276 Points +18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12975 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12158 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=47)	12016 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)	11967 Points +6%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11269 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	10570 Points -6%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10277 Points -9%
Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	2350 Points +31%
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)	1818 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1814 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1801 Points 0%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1796 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1764 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=47)	1753 Points -2%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1462 Points -19%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20.3 fps +22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.5 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.8 fps +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.7 fps
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=45)	16.4 fps -2%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)	16.4 fps -2%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	14.2 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6.69 fps -60%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66.4 s * -38%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	53.6 s * -11%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)	49.6 s * -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40.9 - 79.2, n=44)	49 s * -2%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	48.2 s *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45.7 s * +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.1 s * +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	40.9 s * +15%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	0.647 sec * -38%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.526 sec * -13%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)	0.484 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=44)	0.4819 sec * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4692 sec * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4688 sec * -0%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4675 sec *
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4626 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2383 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

142.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

259 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6164 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

691 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1801 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

15564 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	99.4 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89.6 pt
Average of class Multimedia	85.9 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	84.1 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	83.3 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	70.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	50.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	17004 KRay/s +16%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14712 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)	14429 KRay/s -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14272 KRay/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13431 KRay/s -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=45)	13101 KRay/s -11%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	7376 KRay/s -50%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	6583 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	87764 Points +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	77094 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76175 Points
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)	72714 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=45)	69488 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	68747 Points -10%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	67895 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	19477 Points -74%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3969 MB/s +13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3545 MB/s +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3508 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)	3389 MB/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3320 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=45)	3244 MB/s -8%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	3212 MB/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2893 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)	90849 Points +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88106 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85567 Points +10%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	84273 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	83844 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=45)	83491 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78009 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	68857 Points -12%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10647 Points +18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10012 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9521 Points +5%
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)	9329 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=45)	9119 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9030 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	6136 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1664 Points -82%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	43855 Points +14%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	38466 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	37438 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)	36169 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	34153 Points -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=45)	33738 Points -12%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	18236 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15344 Points -60%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	83176 MB/s +20%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=45)	78240 MB/s +13%
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)	75995 MB/s +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	72068 MB/s +4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	70521 MB/s +2%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69238 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	69000 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	68954 MB/s 0%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1160 MB/s +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1041 MB/s +4%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	1038 MB/s +3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1004 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	966 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=45)	960 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)	935 MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	617 MB/s -39%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	8903 KRay/s +12%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7936 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)	7836 KRay/s -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7584 KRay/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	6970 KRay/s -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=45)	6848 KRay/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	3794 KRay/s -52%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	3597 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	53611 MPixel/s +37%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	52218 MPixel/s +34%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	51992 MPixel/s +33%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	51338 MPixel/s +32%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=45)	46541 MPixel/s +19%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)	40459 MPixel/s +4%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	39025 MPixel/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	34213 MPixel/s -12%

系统性能

办公、互联网和多媒体应用程序以及节俭型游戏都不会给运行流畅的系统带来任何问题。系统基准测试证实了其良好的性能水平。配备相同 CPU 的竞争产品通常性能更佳--更高的功耗限制和快速、永久焊接的 LPDDR5X 内存在这里大显身手。而 Medion S10 则依赖模块化 DDR5-5600 内存。下图说明了速度上的差异。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	7186 Points +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	6994 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6795 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32)	6732 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	6713 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	6247 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5480 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	11289 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	11079 Points +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	10964 Points +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32)	10563 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)	10521 Points +11%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	9459 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8482 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)	8932 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	8927 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32)	8749 Points +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	8470 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	8343 Points +2%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	8215 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7348 Points -11%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	9999 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	9993 Points +17%
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)	9202 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32)	9011 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	8885 Points +4%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	8513 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7166 Points -16%

CrossMark / Overall
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1771 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1751 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)	1703 Points 0%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1699 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32)	1655 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1546 Points -9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1469 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1384 Points -19%

CrossMark / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1704 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1685 Points +2%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1656 Points
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)	1616 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31)	1581 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1447 Points -13%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1378 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1293 Points -22%

CrossMark / Creativity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1916 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1911 Points +6%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)	1909 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1848 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31)	1817 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1803 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1679 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1537 Points -15%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1572 Points +2%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1539 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1514 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)	1435 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31)	1396 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1237 Points -20%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1190 Points -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1106 Points -28%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	454 Points +77%
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years)	312 Points +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	285 Points +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	279 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32)	276 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	275 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	256 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	213 Points -17%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	311 Points +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	259 Points +11%
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years)	259 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	257 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27)	254 Points +9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	252 Points +8%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	246 Points +5%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	234 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	642 ms * -12%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	573 ms *
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	573 ms * -0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33)	541 ms * +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	528 ms * +8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	528 ms * +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	517 ms * +10%
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years)	510 ms * +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	422.3 ms * +26%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		6247 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	94158 MB/s +41%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	93443 MB/s +40%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	91209 MB/s +36%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	91070 MB/s +36%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=45)	83293 MB/s +25%
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)	68580 MB/s +3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66880 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63495 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	125604 MB/s +70%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	90142 MB/s +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	87063 MB/s +18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85824 MB/s +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=45)	79984 MB/s +9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	78395 MB/s +6%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	73708 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)	69599 MB/s -6%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75937 MB/s +15%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	75906 MB/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75823 MB/s +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=45)	72558 MB/s +10%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)	69752 MB/s +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69181 MB/s +5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66061 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	45265 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	233 ns * -66%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (120.2 - 233, n=45)	144.2 ns * -3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	140.2 ns *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	139.9 ns * -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	137.6 ns * +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	125.8 ns * +10%
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)	106.6 ns * +24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	8.8 ns * +94%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

与驱动程序相关的高延迟使用户无法实时编辑视频和音频。不过，未来的软件更新可能会带来改变。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2995.3 μs *
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2447.2 μs * +18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1736.9 μs * +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	824.4 μs * +72%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	600.7 μs * +80%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

来自 Phison 的 PCIe 4 固态硬盘（M.2-2280，1 TB）具有良好的传输速率，但并不属于固态硬盘中的佼佼者。正面：我们没有注意到热引起的节流。S10 有第二个固态硬盘插槽。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3641 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3270 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 630.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 356 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2063 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3264 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 59.27 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 196.4 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	80.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia	74.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	73.2 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	70.5 pt
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	68.9 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	65.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	65.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	48.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3237 (3127.1^min - 3236.53^max) MB/s +58%
Average of class Multimedia (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)	2970 MB/s +45%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2749 (2718.97^min - 2748.53^max) MB/s +34%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2652 (2626.88^min - 2652.48^max) MB/s +29%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2254 (2201.38^min - 2254.23^max) MB/s +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	2188 (2167.89^min - 2188.41^max) MB/s +7%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2049 (2028.99^min - 2049.34^max) MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (1973 - 2049, n=2)	2011 MB/s -2%
seq write
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3229 (3069.6^min - 3229.15^max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)	3092 MB/s -4%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (2721 - 3229, n=2)	2975 MB/s -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2916 (2664.35^min - 2915.5^max) MB/s -10%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2722 (2647.18^min - 2721.68^max) MB/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2330 (2272.26^min - 2329.73^max) MB/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2328 (2307.7^min - 2328.26^max) MB/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	557 (554.49^min - 557^max) MB/s -83%
seq q8 t1 read
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6621 (6016.94^min - 6621.13^max) MB/s +82%
Average of class Multimedia (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)	5486 MB/s +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	5148 (4531.57^min - 5148.3^max) MB/s +41%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3727 (3040.66^min - 3726.94^max) MB/s +2%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3645 (2982.87^min - 3645.22^max) MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (3504 - 3645, n=2)	3575 MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	3562 (3054.5^min - 3562.01^max) MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	3331 (2575.51^min - 3331.12^max) MB/s -9%
seq q8 t1 write
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4961 (4947.18^min - 4960.81^max) MB/s +52%
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)	4169 MB/s +28%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3925 (3848.76^min - 3924.82^max) MB/s +20%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3269 (3263.59^min - 3269^max) MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (3263 - 3269, n=2)	3266 MB/s 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2409 (2377.61^min - 2408.59^max) MB/s -26%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2344 (1404.04^min - 2343.99^max) MB/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	555 (553.17^min - 554.85^max) MB/s -83%
4k q1 t1 read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	80.8 (80.01^min - 80.76^max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)	62.9 MB/s +4%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	60.5 (59.69^min - 60.52^max) MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (56 - 60.5, n=2)	58.3 MB/s -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	54.8 (51.93^min - 54.84^max) MB/s -9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	54.1 (52.53^min - 54.09^max) MB/s -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	51.2 (49.25^min - 51.22^max) MB/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	40.3 (38.77^min - 40.27^max) MB/s -33%
4k q1 t1 write
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	206 (197.33^min - 206.13^max) MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	193 (186.4^min - 192.95^max) MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	190.9 (186.79^min - 190.93^max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)	170.9 MB/s -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	167.7 (152.89^min - 167.68^max) MB/s -19%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (126.4 - 206, n=2)	166.2 MB/s -19%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	101.1 (92.92^min - 101.07^max) MB/s -51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	69.4 (65.86^min - 69.42^max) MB/s -66%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1947 (1678.71^min - 1946.99^max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1821 (1804.4^min - 1821.4^max) MB/s -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1684 (1639.23^min - 1684.06^max) MB/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)	1357 MB/s -30%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (751 - 1947, n=2)	1349 MB/s -31%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	744 (687.95^min - 744^max) MB/s -62%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	588 (581.91^min - 587.83^max) MB/s -70%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	387 (351.99^min - 386.95^max) MB/s -80%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2441 (2399.8^min - 2440.79^max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1643 (1597.74^min - 1643.45^max) MB/s -33%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (333 - 2441, n=2)	1387 MB/s -43%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1142 (1093.19^min - 1142.3^max) MB/s -53%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)	1025 MB/s -58%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	373 (367.24^min - 373.12^max) MB/s -85%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	343 (332.92^min - 343.02^max) MB/s -86%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	230 (216.81^min - 229.87^max) MB/s -91%

AS SSD
Score Total
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	6090 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5122 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)	5061 Points -17%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (3773 - 6090, n=2)	4932 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	4643 Points -24%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	4369 Points -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3893 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	2761 Points -55%
Score Read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2411 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1795 Points -26%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (1016 - 2411, n=2)	1714 Points -29%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)	1630 Points -32%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1511 Points -37%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1293 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	955 Points -60%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	887 Points -63%
Score Write
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3283 Points +35%
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)	2660 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2619 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2437 Points
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (2281 - 2437, n=2)	2359 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2107 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1962 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	1334 Points -45%
Seq Read
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5026.81 MB/s +75%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	4728 MB/s +65%
Average of class Multimedia (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)	4248 MB/s +48%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	3264 MB/s +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3252 MB/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	3189 MB/s +11%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2868.99 MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (2784 - 2869, n=2)	2826 MB/s -1%
Seq Write
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2934 MB/s +1%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2908.39 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)	2749 MB/s -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2714 MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	2654 MB/s -9%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2368.24 MB/s -19%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (1634 - 2908, n=2)	2271 MB/s -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2260 MB/s -22%
4K Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	69.8 MB/s +2%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	68.68 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	64.1 MB/s -7%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	64.05 MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)	61.6 MB/s -10%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (52 - 68.7, n=2)	60.3 MB/s -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	51.5 MB/s -25%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	46.9 MB/s -32%
4K Write
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)	190.3 MB/s +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	182.5 MB/s +2%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	178.65 MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (166 - 178.7, n=2)	172.3 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	168.8 MB/s -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	161.7 MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	143.4 MB/s -20%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	139.13 MB/s -22%
4K-64 Read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2055.8 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1407 MB/s -32%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (686 - 2056, n=2)	1371 MB/s -33%
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)	1144 MB/s -44%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1138 MB/s -45%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	726.75 MB/s -65%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	577 MB/s -72%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	350 MB/s -83%
4K-64 Write
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2906.67 MB/s +48%
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)	2195 MB/s +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2164 MB/s +10%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1967.43 MB/s
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (1952 - 1967, n=2)	1960 MB/s 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1653 MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1567 MB/s -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	925 MB/s -53%
Access Time Read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	0.07 ms *
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.062 ms * +11%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (0.052 - 0.07, n=2)	0.061 ms * +13%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)	0.0551 ms * +21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	0.041 ms * +41%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	0.037 ms * +47%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.033 ms * +53%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.022 ms * +69%
Access Time Write
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.101 ms * -261%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)	0.06104 ms * -118%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.032 ms * -14%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.029 ms * -4%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	0.028 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	0.028 ms * -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	0.026 ms * +7%
Average Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 (0.023 - 0.028, n=2)	0.0255 ms * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3612 (3081.97-3641.23)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5265 (4532.36-6169.85)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3316 (2576.65-3331.75)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3215 (2929.72-3237.37)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6074 (3285.54-6606.66)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3477 (2383.41-3561.17)

图形卡

虽然这款处理器的性能相当不错，但英特尔的 Arc 8iGPU 却未能发挥其潜力。在基准测试和运行游戏时，配备相同 GPU 的竞争对手的性能要高出 30% 到 50%。为什么会这样呢？首先，S10 的 GPU 从未达到最高时钟频率（2250 MHz），其次，竞争对手的内存（DDR5-5600 与 LPDDR5X-7466）速度更快。

即使性能降低，图形处理器也能处理许多节俭型游戏，但设置必须缩减。正如《赛博朋克 2077：魅影》所证明的那样，稳定的帧速率是可能的。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	67.9 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66.9 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	61.6 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	58.8 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	46.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	36.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)	20075 Points +119%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13539 Points +48%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13381 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12099 Points +32%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8064 - 13716, n=35)	11984 Points +31%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9156 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6515 Points -29%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)	14437 Points +127%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9692 Points +52%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9650 Points +52%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9216 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8886 Points +40%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5568 - 9692, n=39)	8302 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6414 Points +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6365 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)	5446 Points +106%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3786 Points +43%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3770 Points +43%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3656 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3426 Points +30%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (2018 - 3770, n=42)	3231 Points +22%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2643 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1739 Points -34%

3DMark 11 Performance		9522 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5865 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		2962 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2356 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10

Blender
v3.3 Classroom CPU
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	514 Seconds * -48%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (294 - 692, n=38)	430 Seconds * -24%
Average of class Multimedia (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years)	430 Seconds * -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	412 Seconds * -19%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	347 Seconds *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	344 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	339 Seconds * +2%
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (208 - 261, n=13)	228 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia (203 - 215, n=3, last 2 years)	209 Seconds *
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	203 Seconds *

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Multimedia (10769 - 122560, n=85, last 2 years)	60173 Points +143%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	50682 Points +105%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33472 Points +35%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32336 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	30876 Points +25%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (17193 - 37639, n=41)	30130 Points +22%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	24714 Points
Vulkan Score 5.5
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32938 Points +51%
Average of class Multimedia (2104 - 62587, n=46, last 2 years)	28640 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	25116 Points +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	24711 Points +13%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (2104 - 32938, n=42)	23923 Points +9%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	21880 Points
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2104 Points -90%

Geekbench 6.3
GPU OpenCL
Average of class Multimedia (9994 - 112310, n=57, last 2 years)	52106 Points +109%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	48462 Points +95%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35957 Points +44%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35855 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35154 Points +41%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (17911 - 39941, n=41)	32332 Points +30%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	24915 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	20783 Points -17%
GPU Vulkan
Average of class Multimedia (11351 - 92135, n=47, last 2 years)	34313 Points +20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33886 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33442 Points +17%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33133 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32858 Points +15%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (16515 - 37129, n=40)	31483 Points +10%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	28575 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	24011 Points -16%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark - CPU
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11001 mpaths
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8242 - 13309, n=16)	10403 mpaths -5%
Average of class Multimedia (5027 - 19998, n=39, last 2 years)	10018 mpaths -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6990 mpaths -36%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Multimedia (45 - 684, n=64, last 2 years)	270 mpaths +197%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	98 mpaths +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	93 mpaths +2%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	91 mpaths
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	84 mpaths -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	82 mpaths -10%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (47 - 99, n=28)	78.3 mpaths -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	63 mpaths -31%
CPU
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18280 ksamples +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17556 ksamples +9%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16064 ksamples
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15574 ksamples -3%
Average of class Multimedia (7035 - 30140, n=64, last 2 years)	15553 ksamples -3%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (9582 - 18829, n=28)	14468 ksamples -10%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12820 ksamples -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	10333 ksamples -36%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	80.4 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	58.4 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	57.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	52.5 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	51.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ^-1! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	42.7 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	42.1 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Multimedia (8.26 - 80.7, n=50, last 2 years)	34.3 fps +142%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	25.7 (15.9^min) fps +81%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	21.5 (9.21^min, 15.1^P0.1, 17.5^P1) fps +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21.9 (14^min) fps +54%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21.2 (12.2^min) fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.7 (15.8^min) fps +46%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (13 - 24.7, n=24)	20.3 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	14.9 (11.6^min) fps +5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	14.2 (11.8^min) fps

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)	53.5 fps +369%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	21.5 (2.75^min, 12.5^P1) fps +89%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	16 (2.73^min, 11.4^P1) fps +40%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	15.9 (2.93^min, 11.4^P1) fps +39%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (9.59 - 20.6, n=34)	14.8 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	14.3 (1.247^min, 7.75^P1) fps +25%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	11.4 (1.718^min, 8.77^P1) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)	50.9 fps +144%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	42 fps +101%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.6 fps +46%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.5 fps +46%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (14.7 - 31.7, n=41)	24.9 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	24.4 fps +17%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15.9 fps -24%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)	87.4 fps +146%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	60 (43^min, 46.4^P1) fps +69%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	55 fps +54%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	53 fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	47 fps +32%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (27.1 - 58.9, n=37)	45 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	38 fps +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.6 (5^min, 6.04^P1) fps

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)	96.4 fps +59%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	88.7 (74.7^min) fps +46%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	80.6 (55.9^min) fps +33%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	79.8 (51.5^min) fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	73.6 (51.1^min) fps +21%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (35.2 - 80.9, n=41)	67.1 fps +11%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	60.6 (38.4^min) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	53 (39.7^min) fps -13%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)	66.8 fps +121%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	60.1 fps +99%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (27.9 - 43.9, n=42)	35 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	33.5 fps +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	33.5 fps +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	32.4 fps +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.2 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø13.8 (11.3-15.8)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS: Ø12.8 (12.3-13.2)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø22.4 (20.3-24.2)

LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø21.5 (20-22.5)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	144	131.8	32.3	11.4	9.23	9.14
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	95.1	83.4	64.1	60.6		31.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	51.9	29.7	20.9		15.9	8.98
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	47.6	36	30.2			19.3
Strange Brigade (2018)	129.8	51.1	43.8	35.6	25.7	14.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	22.1	17.6	15.4	14.7	10.4	5.42
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	23.3	19	16.3	14.2	9.21

排放与动力 - 价值不佳

噪音排放

尽管 S10 的计算能力有所下降，但它产生的噪音却略高于竞争对手：在满载情况下，我们注意到噪音水平高达 48 dB(A)，而Cyberpunk的噪音水平为 42 dB(A)。总体而言，S10 还可以做得更安静一些。在日常使用中，两个风扇的噪音基本保持不变。

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 27 / 28 dB(A)
Load		43 / 48 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
Noise		4%	17%	12%	3%	8%
off / environment *	25	24.1 4%	24.6 2%	24.4 2%	25.2 -1%	24.6 2%
Idle Minimum *	26	24.1 7%	24.6 5%	24.4 6%	25.2 3%	24.6 5%
Idle Average *	27	24.1 11%	24.6 9%	24.4 10%	26.3 3%	24.6 9%
Idle Maximum *	28	28.2 -1%	24.6 12%	24.4 13%	26.7 5%	26.4 6%
Load Average *	43	44.4 -3%	28.1 35%	32 26%	31.8 26%	40 7%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	42		32.4 23%		52 -24%
Load Maximum *	48	44.4 7%	32.4 32%	39.7 17%	45.1 6%	40 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *		36.5		30.6		40

* ... smaller is better

温度

在满负荷情况下，温度会明显升高：我们在几个测量点测得的数值都超过了 50°C。运行赛博朋克游戏时温度较低。掌托的温度始终在绿色范围内。总之，S10 的发热量高于同类产品。

压力测试（Prime95 和 Furmark 连续运行）检查系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。CPU 最初的运行速度（< 3 GHz）远低于基本时钟，图形核心的运行速度为 750 MHz。随后，CPU 时钟在 1 至 2.5 GHz 之间波动。一旦 CPU 降低时钟频率，GPU 的时钟频率就会上升到 1.4-1.5 GHz。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


55 °C	53 °C	43 °C
47 °C	39 °C	36 °C
30 °C	30 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 55 °C
Average: 40.2 °C


46 °C	55 °C	53 °C
41 °C	48 °C	39 °C
33 °C	33 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 55 °C
Average: 42.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 55 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


30 °C	31 °C	29 °C
30 °C	32 °C	28 °C
28 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 29.1 °C


30 °C	33 °C	33 °C
28 °C	29 °C	29 °C
27 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 29.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 33 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


47 °C	47 °C	40 °C
44 °C	44 °C	35 °C
30 °C	30 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 38.4 °C


43 °C	46 °C	48 °C
41 °C	43 °C	38 °C
32 °C	34 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 39.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 50 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).

	Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Heat		27%	17%	19%	3%	24%
Maximum Upper Side *	55	36.3 34%	44.3 19%	40.3 27%	49 11%	40.9 26%
Maximum Bottom *	55	39.1 29%	51.6 6%	45.9 17%	48.5 12%	42.6 23%
Idle Upper Side *	32	24.9 22%	25.1 22%	26.3 18%	33.5 -5%	24.5 23%
Idle Bottom *	33	26.1 21%	25.8 22%	27.9 15%	35 -6%	24.8 25%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

立体声扬声器能产生不错的音效，但几乎没有低音。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Medion S10 OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

总体而言，对于所安装的硬件而言，笔记本电脑的能耗处于正常水平。不过，在空闲模式下，S10 比竞争对手需要更多的能量。在运行赛博朋克时，耗电量保持不变，而在压力测试时，耗电量则有所波动和下降。电源（90 瓦）的大小仍然足够。设备在压力测试开始时的需求增加并未造成任何问题。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / Watt
Idle	7 / 10 / 19 Watt
Load	52 / 95 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Power Consumption		15%	39%	-2%	-21%	38%
Idle Minimum *	7	3.5 50%	4.2 40%	4.2 40%	10.15 -45%	3.6 49%
Idle Average *	10	9.6 4%	5.6 44%	11.6 -16%	11.65 -17%	5.7 43%
Idle Maximum *	19	9.9 48%	7.8 59%	12.3 35%	14.33 25%	6.1 68%
Load Average *	52	62.7 -21%	28.3 46%	61.9 -19%	67.5 -30%	52.5 -1%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	49.2		38.2 22%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	53.2		38.8 27%		85.3 -60%
Load Maximum *	95	101.2 -7%	61.9 35%	140.6 -48%	91.7 3%	64.7 32%
Witcher 3 ultra *		55.8		57		46.6

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Medion S10 OLED; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø80.5 (66-94.6)

Medion S10 OLED; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.65 (6.84-19.1)

Medion S10 OLED; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø53.2 (51-54.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

Medion S10 OLED; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø78.1 (71-94.7)

Medion S10 OLED; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.2 (48.3-75.5)

Medion S10 OLED; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø45.3 (42.8-53.4)

Medion S10 OLED; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.14 (3.64-19)

Medion S10 OLED; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø49.2 (45.8-50.6)

运行时间

Medion 承诺运行时间长达 8 小时（视频播放）。这在我们看来很现实：S10 在 7:16 小时后结束了我们的 WiFi 测试（使用脚本访问网站时的负载映射）。无论是从绝对值还是从瓦时来看，这都是同类笔记本电脑中最差的。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 126)

7h 16min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh	983 min +125%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh	756 min +73%
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	686 min +57%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 76 Wh	644 min +48%
Average of class Multimedia (279 - 1204, n=85, last 2 years)	625 min +43%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 61.8 Wh	443 min +2%
Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh	436 min

Pros

+ 宽高比为 16:10 的 4k OLED 显示屏

+ 覆盖 DCI-P3

+ 相对轻巧

+ 稳定的金属外壳

+ 2 个固态硬盘插槽

+ 内存可升级

+ 电力传输

Cons

- GPU 性能远低于平均水平

- 反光显示屏表面

- 没有 USB 4/Thunderbolt 4

- 无 SD 读卡器

- 空闲模式下功耗低于最佳水平

- 负载情况下发热严重

- 价格昂贵

评价--不够全面

S10 拥有 OLED 面板（4k、DCI-P3、16 英寸、16:10）、两个固态硬盘插槽、模块化内存、光滑紧凑的金属外壳以及两个 USB-C 端口（Power Delivery、DP Alt-Mode）。当前的流星湖处理器可提供预期的性能水平。此外，这款笔记本电脑的重量也不算太重。

Medion S10 OLED 的概念令人费解。据称它是一款多媒体笔记本电脑，但这恰恰是该设备的弱点。

它的 Arc iGPU 性能远低于其可能性--因此，这款笔记本电脑的多媒体功能被否定了。由于 Medion 没有安装 USB 4/Thunderbolt 4，你甚至无法通过连接外置 GPU 来弥补这一缺陷--笔记本电脑只配备了速度较慢的 USB 3.2 Gen 1 端口。

尽管性能有所下降，但实际上它有时会比竞争对手更响、更热。闲置模式下的功耗也是如此。在运行时间方面，Medion 笔记本电脑也有劣势。一般来说，售价 1400 美元的笔记本电脑不应该存在这些缺陷。

可以选择联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9.它的计算能力更强，运行时间更长，还带有一个 USB-4 端口。它的内存是焊接上去的，不能更换，但大多数竞争产品也是如此。

价格和供应情况

Medion S10 OLED 的最高售价约为 1,400 美元。在撰写本文时，这款笔记本电脑在美国还没有在线销售。

请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息请点击此处.

Medion S10 OLED - 07/29/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

59 / 80 → 74%

Weight

68 / 20-74 → 89%

Battery

76 / 95 → 80%

Display

82%

Games Performance

34 / 88 → 39%

Application Performance

83 / 92 → 90%

AI Performance

72%

Temperature

83%

Noise

79 / 95 → 83%

Audio

83%

Camera

40 / 75 → 53%

Average

59%

77%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
77.6%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 33.3%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 339 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Medion S10 OLED 评测：配备 OLED 面板和酷睿 7 处理器的多媒体笔记本电脑

Sascha Mölck, 2024-07-31 (Update: 2024-07-31)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Lenovo B50-30 (min) N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	49
...
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2366
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2380
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2382
Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2383
Medion Erazer Major X10 i7-12700H, A730M	2384
Medion S17431-MD62640 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2384
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2389.34
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

Medion S10 OLED 评测：配备 OLED 面板和酷睿 7 处理器的多媒体笔记本电脑

慢慢来

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳和连接性 - S10 没有 USB 4

尺寸比较

可持续性

输入设备 - S10 具有背光按键

显示屏 - OLED、DCI-P3、16:10

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能--Meteor Lake 有时需要慢慢来

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

排放与动力 - 价值不佳

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Medion S10 OLED audio analysis

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 audio analysis

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Pros

Cons

评价--不够全面

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450	9495
Asus ExpertCenter D9 SFF i7-11700, T600	9497
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	9518
Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9522
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	9529
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE R7 PRO 7735U, Radeon 680M	9538
MSI GS40-6QE16H11 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	9544
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609