Notebookcheck Logo

联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 评测--配备 120 Hz 显示屏和酷睿 7 处理器的多媒体笔记本电脑

英特尔还是 AMD?

IdeaPad Pro 5 16 是一款大型多媒体笔记本电脑,配备了最新的 Meteor Lake 处理器、120 赫兹显示屏和现代连接选项。不过,联想也提供 AMD 机型,我们想看看哪款更好。
AI Arc Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Windows

IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 是一款采用最新硬件的大型多媒体笔记本电脑,联想让买家在英特尔当前的酷睿 Ultra 处理器和 AMD 的 Ryzen 8000 芯片之间进行选择。在之前测试了 较小的 14 英寸机型处理器的 14 英寸机型,现在我们将对配备最新 酷睿至尊 7 155H包括弧形图形处理器。该机售价约为 1,400 美元,配备 32 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘以及分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素的 120-Hz IPS 雾面面板。您还可以选择配备 Nvidia 专用 GPU 的 IdeaPad(如RTX 3050 笔记本电脑& RTX 4050 笔记本电脑).

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (IdeaPad Pro Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 70 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Core: 2250 MHz, 31.0.101.5333
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, 1024 GB 
, 887 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.5 x 356 x 251
Battery
84 Wh, 5285 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 100W USB-C PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.891 kg, Power Supply: 385 g
Price
1300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.9 kg17.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
85 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg18.4 mm16.00"1920x1200
89.7 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.9 kg15.9 mm16.00"3072x1920
88.1 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.6 kg19.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.6 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
1.2 kg13 mm16.00"3200x2000
84.9 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.6 kg19 mm15.60"2880x1620

外壳 - 铝制,有轻微的吱吱声

联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 采用光滑的灰色铝制外壳,在专业环境中使用没有任何问题。它的边框很薄,但确实有一个摄像头驼峰,不是特别吸引人。但它至少是实用的,因为它可以让你非常轻松地打开笔记本的盖子。在设备光滑的表面上,指纹痕迹也不是什么大问题。

在质量方面,IdeaPad Pro 表现出色,不过,我们在操作测试设备时确实注意到其铰链偶尔会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音。说到铰链,它们一般都调整得很好,最大开启角度约为 170 度。底座非常稳定,而当我们对机盖施加很大压力时,显示屏上会出现一些轻微的波纹。

就尺寸而言,竞争对手之间的差别不大,只有微星 Prestige 的机身明显更深一些。不过,我们的测试设备重量略低于 1.9 千克,与红米笔记本 Pro 一起成为最重的设备之一。100 瓦电源的重量增加了 385 克。

尺寸比较

358 mm 258 mm 19.1 mm 1.6 kg358 mm 231 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg356.7 mm 248.7 mm 18.4 mm 1.7 kg356 mm 251 mm 17.5 mm 1.9 kg358.2 mm 246.4 mm 13 mm 1.2 kg355 mm 248 mm 15.9 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4 和 HDMI 2.1

联想为 IdeaPad 配备了所有重要的连接。英特尔机型配备了现代的 Thunderbolt 4 连接,而其中一个 USB-C 端口必须用于供电。配备 Nvidia GPU 的配置在左侧有一个额外的 SlimTip 连接,用于更强大的电源。在日常使用中,您可能会对两个普通 USB-A 端口感到满意,而无需使用适配器。

左:HDMI 2.1、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(10 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery)、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 4.0(40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0)
左:HDMI 2.1、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(10 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery)、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 4.0(40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0)
右侧SD 读卡器、3.5 毫米音频、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/秒)、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbit/秒,带电)
右侧SD 读卡器、3.5 毫米音频、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/秒)、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbit/秒,带电)

SD 读卡器

设备右侧有一个功能齐全的 SD 读卡器,与我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)配合使用,可实现 75-85 MB/s 的平均传输速率。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182.5 MB/s +146%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)
102.2 MB/s +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
74.1 MB/s
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (AV Pro V60)
24.6 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
221.2 MB/s +153%
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)
142.9 MB/s +63%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
87.5 MB/s
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (AV Pro V60)
36.6 MB/s -58%

交流

联想安装了最新的 WiFi 6E 适配器,即英特尔的 AX211 模块。在我们的测试中,它使用华硕的参考路由器提供了很高且稳定的传输速率。在实际使用中,我们也从未遇到过信号强度方面的问题。IdeaPad 不支持 Wi-Fi 7。

Networking
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1656 (min: 1459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1666 (min: 1617) MBit/s ∼98%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1658 (min: 1616) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1693 (min: 1623) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
671 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
901 (min: 877) MBit/s ∼53%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1144 (min: 654) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1317 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1210 (min: 747) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1111 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼80%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
537 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1443 (min: 1217) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1256 (min: 1053) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1225 (min: 1094) MBit/s ∼88%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 468) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1274 (min: 787) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1391 (min: 670) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1656 (1459-1743)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1666 (1617-1687)

网络摄像头

现在,几乎所有的联想笔记本电脑都有一个摄像头驼峰,新款 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 也不例外。它的 1080p 摄像头能在良好的光线条件下拍摄出漂亮的照片,而且还配备了机械盖。此外,它还可以访问红外传感器,通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。此外,它还支持所有新的网络摄像头工作室特效(柔焦、眼神接触、头部跟踪)--AMD 型号也是如此。

ColorChecker
2.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9: 8.68 ∆E min: 2.67 - max: 17.71 ∆E

维护

底盖由 Torx 螺钉(T5)固定。在内部,你可以访问紧凑型 M.2-2242 固态硬盘和一个额外的 M.2-2280 插槽(均为 PCIe 4.0),通过它们可以廉价地扩展笔记本电脑的存储空间。如果需要,还可以更换 WLAN 模块和电池,而内存模块则是焊接上去的。

内部建设
内部建设
可互换无线局域网模块
可互换无线局域网模块
主 M.2-2242 固态硬盘
主 M.2-2242 固态硬盘

输入设备 - 专用数字键盘

IdeaPad Pro 5 16 的深灰色键盘打字手感与较小的 14 英寸机型相同。 14 英寸机型一样、这意味着它仅次于更昂贵的 ThinkPad 或优秀的竞争对手,如 小米红米笔记本 Pro.它的键程足够大,按键也很精确,但总的来说,键盘给人的感觉有点摇摇欲坠,键帽也需要更坚固一些。此外,较大的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 配备了专用数字键盘和两种强度设置的白色背光,可通过传感器自动激活。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光
键盘背光

点击板的尺寸为 13.5 x 8 厘米,为输入提供了足够的空间。它的表面光滑漂亮,我们在测试过程中使用它没有任何问题,只是按下下部区域时发出的噪音非常大,似乎有点廉价。我们建议您在输入时只需轻敲键盘即可。

显示屏 - 120 赫兹 IPS

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
轻微背光出血(显示略有增强)
轻微背光出血(显示略有增强)

购买 16 英寸联想笔记本电脑的用户可以选择 OLED 面板或 IPS 面板,这两种面板的技术规格差别很大。我们的测试设备配备的是分辨率较高的 IPS 面板(2560 x 1600 像素),但亮度只有 350 尼特,覆盖范围为 sRGB。而 OLED 面板的分辨率要低得多(2,048 x 1,280 像素),但亮度可达 400 尼特,并覆盖 P3 色彩空间。主观而言,IPS 面板看起来还不错,但色彩显得有些苍白。在这方面,IdeaPad 无法与 OLED 面板或安装在红米笔记本 Pro 上的 P3-IPS 面板相比。不过,光照区域不会出现颗粒感,我们也没有注意到 IPS 面板闪烁的现象,其响应时间也非常快。移动也得益于其更高的频率(120 Hz)。

该面板的平均亮度为 368 cd/m²,超过了制造商提供的数值,其黑色值为 0.31 cd/m²,最大对比度接近 1,200:1。这些数值尚可,但仅此而已。背光出血问题不大。

361
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
NE160QDM-NY2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 385 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 367.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 368 cd/m²
Contrast: 1187:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Samsung SDC4180, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"
Display
4%
33%
29%
39%
36%
Display P3 Coverage
63.3
66.7
5%
98.8
56%
96.7
53%
99.9
58%
99.93
58%
sRGB Coverage
95.2
96.5
1%
100
5%
99.8
5%
100
5%
100
5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.3
68.8
5%
89.9
38%
84.6
30%
100
53%
95.52
46%
Response Times
-102%
-102%
-229%
93%
84%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15 ?(7.4, 7.6)
31 ?(14.4, 16.6)
-107%
39.2 ?(15.8, 18.4)
-161%
49.4 ?(22.6, 26.8)
-229%
0.57 ?(0.28, 0.29)
96%
2 ?(1, 1)
87%
Response Time Black / White *
10.3 ?(5.6, 4.7)
20.3 ?(10.6, 9.7)
-97%
14.6 ?(4.4, 10.2)
-42%
33.9 ?(15.6, 18.3)
-229%
1 ?(0.55, 0.45)
90%
2 ?(1, 1)
81%
PWM Frequency
238.8
240
Screen
-1%
5%
-7%
2%
154%
Brightness middle
368
349
-5%
520
41%
473.6
29%
379.8
3%
370.4
1%
Brightness
368
340
-8%
510
39%
456
24%
383
4%
376
2%
Brightness Distribution
91
80
-12%
93
2%
87
-4%
98
8%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.31
0.24
23%
0.35
-13%
0.19
39%
0.02
94%
Contrast
1187
1454
22%
1486
25%
2493
110%
18520
1460%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.4
2.8
-17%
2.9
-21%
5.9
-146%
4.7
-96%
1.51
37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.5
7.3
-12%
6.2
5%
9.37
-44%
7.51
-16%
2.89
56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.8
0.7
12%
1.1
-38%
0.89
-11%
0.55
31%
3.36
-320%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.5
4.9
-9%
4.3
4%
7.3
-62%
0.8
82%
2.1
53%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.2 100%
2.19 100%
1.9 116%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
CCT
6324 103%
7328 89%
7422 88%
7260 90%
6381 102%
6536 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-33% / -14%
-21% / -4%
-69% / -31%
45% / 27%
91% / 119%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准

其制造商的校准结果显示没有重大的色彩偏差,但我们测量到了轻微的红色色调,而且色温有点过高。通过我们自己的校准,我们可以大大改善屏幕的显示效果(可在上面免费下载相应的配置文件),从而实现极低的灰度和色彩偏差。加上其全面的 sRGB 覆盖范围,你可以很好地编辑照片和视频。

对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.6 ms rise
↘ 4.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.4 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下
在阳光下
室外(没有阳光直射的晴朗天气)
室外(没有阳光直射的晴朗天气)

在室外,你很快就会发现显示屏的亮度非常有限,需要更高的亮度才能让你在明亮的日子里舒适地在室外工作。在可视角度方面,只有从对角线上方观看 IPS 面板时,你才会发现对比度会有相当大的下降,但这在日常使用中应该不会造成影响。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - Core Ultra 7,LPDDR5x 内存

 
 

测试条件

联想提供了所有我们熟悉的能源配置文件(省电模式、自动模式、性能模式),但性能模式在没有专用 GPU 的配置中没有任何优势,只是风扇的声音更大。因此,我们使用预设的自动模式进行了以下基准测试和测量。省电模式也可用于简单的任务,不会出现任何问题,因为可以通过组合键 Fn+Q 轻松切换不同的配置文件。

处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H

酷睿至尊 7 155H 酷睿至尊 7 155H是英特尔最新一代流星湖处理器的一部分,也是继 酷睿 i7-13700H.在 IdeaPad Pro 5 中,该处理器的短时功耗为 70 瓦,长时间负载时功耗为 50 瓦。这使得它的多核性能非常出色,总体上略高于较小的 IdeaPad Pro 5 14Ryzen 7 8845HS(60/50 瓦)略胜一筹。其单核性能也同样出色,不过你应该知道,与旧款 Raptor Lake 芯片相比,Meteor Lake 芯片并没有真正提高性能,但由于改变了内核架构,它们在低负载时的工作效率要高得多。在电池模式下,CPU 的性能保持稳定。更多 CPU 基准测试可在 我们的技术部分。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2651 (2550.53-2701.61)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1949 (1809.79-2490.19)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18)
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2289 (2208.24-2361.97)
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1628 (1515.15-1985.51)
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2242 (2190.82-2500.94)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2535 (2513.19-2555.42)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
79.8 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
78.8 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
78.7 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
76.8 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
75.1 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
73.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
73.1 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
71.2 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
67.8 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17780 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17401 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
15889 Points -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
15591 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years)
15500 Points -13%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15013 (14365.6min - 15012.9max) Points -16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9769 - 19007, n=48)
14932 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
13984 Points -21%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
12032 (9372.55min - 12032.4max) Points -32%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
1963 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1777 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
1772 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years)
1769 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1759 Points -1%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1496 - 1815, n=48)
1725 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1719 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1716 Points -3%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6947 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6671 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6231 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
5857 Points -16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3798 - 7409, n=46)
5794 Points -17%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5741 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years)
5687 Points -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
5435 Points -22%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
4740 Points -32%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
759 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
691 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
677 Points -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
669 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
668 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
667 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (601 - 696, n=46)
664 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years)
651 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
629 Points -9%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2745 (2259.12min - 2745.18max) Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2702 (2550.53min - 2701.61max) Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2555 (2513.19min - 2555.42max) Points -5%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
2501 (2190.82min - 2500.94max) Points -7%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
2490 (1809.79min - 2490.19max) Points -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1932 - 2880, n=52)
2446 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years)
2445 Points -10%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2362 (2208.24min - 2361.97max) Points -13%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1986 (1515.15min - 1985.51max) Points -26%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
286 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
274 Points +2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
268 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
268 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years)
258 Points -4%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
257 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (99.6 - 268, n=48)
249 Points -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
236 Points -12%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
266 Seconds * -36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * -30%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
239 Seconds * -23%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (175 - 381, n=44)
233 Seconds * -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
216 Seconds * -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
214 Seconds * -10%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
214 Seconds * -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
195 Seconds *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
190 Seconds * +3%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68535 MIPS
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68254 MIPS 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
65072 MIPS -5%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
64527 MIPS -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
63244 MIPS -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
61847 MIPS -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60219 MIPS -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (41739 - 70254, n=46)
59045 MIPS -14%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
54022 MIPS -21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
6328 MIPS +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6274 MIPS +15%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
6041 MIPS +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5716 MIPS +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5486 MIPS +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
5460 MIPS 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5458 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4795 - 5621, n=46)
5345 MIPS -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5291 MIPS -3%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (7592 - 25760, n=67, last 2 years)
13814 Points +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13501 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13291 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
13225 Points 0%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12727 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
12611 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12578 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (7732 - 13656, n=51)
12280 Points -8%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
10763 Points -19%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
2807 Points +14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1534 - 3927, n=63, last 2 years)
2720 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
2716 Points +10%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2562 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2540 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2459 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2418 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2414 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1901 - 2473, n=48)
2376 Points -3%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13276 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12975 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
12604 Points -3%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12499 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years)
12061 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (10017 - 13556, n=48)
12022 Points -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
11817 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
11802 Points -9%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
9516 Points -27%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
2020 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
1949 Points +7%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1933 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1875 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years)
1826 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1814 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1801 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1462 - 1824, n=48)
1752 Points -3%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -4%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
20.3 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.5 fps -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
18.6 fps -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
17.4 fps -14%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
17.1 fps -16%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.9 fps -17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9.93 - 21.2, n=46)
16.4 fps -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.4 fps -19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15.4 fps -24%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years)
49.2 s * -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (37.5 - 79.2, n=45)
48.8 s * -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47.1 s * -7%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.9 s * -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
45.7 s * -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
44.1 s *
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
43.4 s * +2%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
38.6 s * +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
36.1 s * +18%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.504 sec * -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.4845 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (0.4457 - 0.53, n=45)
0.4825 sec * -4%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4723 sec * -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4692 sec * -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4626 sec *
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4593 sec * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4464 sec * +4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4276 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2702 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
160.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
268 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6947 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
691 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1777 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17780 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
107.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
993 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
93 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
85.5 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
83.8 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
83.6 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
81.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
79.9 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
78.4 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
77.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
17924 KRay/s +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
17004 KRay/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
15218 KRay/s -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14829 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)
14392 KRay/s -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
14272 KRay/s -16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6670 - 18470, n=46)
13107 KRay/s -23%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
12685 KRay/s -25%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
87764 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
78381 Points -11%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
78360 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
77094 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
73606 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)
72601 Points -17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40905 - 93181, n=46)
69549 Points -21%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65478 Points -25%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3969 MB/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3616 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3545 MB/s -11%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
3519 MB/s -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3391 MB/s -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)
3385 MB/s -15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1940 - 4436, n=46)
3249 MB/s -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3022 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
108292 Points +27%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
103776 Points +21%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
96417 Points +13%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
93266 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)
90675 Points +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
88106 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
85567 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64698 - 94181, n=46)
83603 Points -2%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
12063 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10647 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10170 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10012 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)
9325 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
9324 Points -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (5639 - 10647, n=46)
9130 Points -14%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8738 Points -18%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
43855 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
40720 Points -7%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
38412 Points -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
37438 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)
36124 Points -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
35833 Points -18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (18236 - 47685, n=46)
33785 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
31662 Points -28%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
113879 MB/s +37%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
83176 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (45713 - 152179, n=46)
78103 MB/s -6%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
76481 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)
75931 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
72068 MB/s -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
68004 MB/s -18%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
54432 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1160 MB/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1058 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1041 MB/s -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
995 MB/s -14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (557 - 1250, n=46)
962 MB/s -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)
934 MB/s -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
872 MB/s -25%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
822 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
9347 KRay/s +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8903 KRay/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8102 KRay/s -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7952 KRay/s -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)
7814 KRay/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
7584 KRay/s -15%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6921 KRay/s -22%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3569 - 9802, n=46)
6853 KRay/s -23%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
53611 MPixel/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
52218 MPixel/s -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (32719 - 54223, n=46)
46590 MPixel/s -13%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
46208 MPixel/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)
40793 MPixel/s -24%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40251 MPixel/s -25%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
36585 MPixel/s -32%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
31055 MPixel/s -42%

系统性能

主观而言,这款笔记本电脑的性能令人印象深刻,输入执行时没有明显的延迟,但公平地说,几乎所有现代设备都是如此。它的内存不能升级,如果你决定选择配备 16GB 内存的机型,就应该考虑到这一点。您最多可以选择 32 GB 内存。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
7186 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7033 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
6994 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
6952 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6789 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5159 - 7529, n=32)
6732 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
6472 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
6190 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
11664 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
11289 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
11193 Points -1%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11156 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
10964 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
10816 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8580 - 11289, n=32)
10563 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10515 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
10099 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
8927 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8919 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (7822 - 10591, n=32)
8749 Points -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8705 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
8470 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
7979 Points -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7594 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
9999 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
9993 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9720 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9194 Points -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (4985 - 10709, n=32)
9011 Points -10%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
8347 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
7905 Points -21%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7573 Points -24%
CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2090 Points +35%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1811 Points +17%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1804 Points +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1771 Points +15%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1769 Points +14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years)
1719 Points +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1366 - 1903, n=32)
1655 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
1546 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2030 Points +40%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1798 Points +24%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1722 Points +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1704 Points +18%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1693 Points +17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years)
1628 Points +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1291 - 1798, n=31)
1581 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
1447 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2151 Points +16%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2041 Points +10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years)
1932 Points +5%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1928 Points +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1916 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
1848 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1821 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1519 - 1929, n=31)
1817 Points -2%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2094 Points +89%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1775 Points +60%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1572 Points +42%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1556 Points +41%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1474 Points +33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years)
1441 Points +30%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (939 - 1802, n=31)
1396 Points +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
1106 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
321 Points +13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years)
319 Points +12%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
315 Points +11%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
306 Points +7%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
299 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
285 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
279 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (252 - 299, n=32)
276 Points -3%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
348 Points +34%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
263 Points +2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years)
262 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
259 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (234 - 309, n=27)
254 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
252 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
250 Points -3%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (517 - 614, n=33)
541 ms * -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
528 ms * -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
525 ms * -2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
522 ms * -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
517 ms *
Average of class Multimedia
  (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years)
503 ms * +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
498 ms * +4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
456 ms * +12%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7186 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
94158 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
93443 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 96791, n=46)
83126 MB/s -12%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80951 MB/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)
69078 MB/s -27%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
68255 MB/s -28%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62899 MB/s -33%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
57062 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
87063 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
85824 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (60544 - 90647, n=46)
80035 MB/s -8%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75886 MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)
70185 MB/s -19%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58557 MB/s -33%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
55510 MB/s -36%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
50373 MB/s -42%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91257 MB/s +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75937 MB/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75909 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (58692 - 93451, n=46)
72600 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)
70291 MB/s -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
69292 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69181 MB/s -9%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58061 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (116.2 - 233, n=46)
143.6 ns * -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
139.9 ns * -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
137.6 ns *
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
135.9 ns * +1%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
115.9 ns * +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)
107 ns * +22%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
102.3 ns * +26%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
88.9 ns * +35%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有显示出任何限制。虽然有一个驱动程序出现了偏差,但重要的 "中断到处理延迟 "值很低。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
998 μs * -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
824.4 μs *
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
622.4 μs * +25%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
600.7 μs * +27%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
580.3 μs * +30%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
527.2 μs * +36%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试样品配备了三星公司生产的 M.2-2242 固态硬盘(PM9C1a),存储容量为 1 TB。PCIe-4.0 固态硬盘的传输速率非常高,即使在长时间负载的情况下,我们也没有发现任何限制。用户可以使用另一个 M.2-2280 插槽(也是 PCIe 4.0)进行简单的存储扩展。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。

Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5693 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2525 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 278 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 223 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 64.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 79.8 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 199.8 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 489 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
85.8 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
85.4 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
76.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
59.4 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
55.8 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
53.2 pt
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
 
51.8 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
50.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4432 (4393.32min - 4432.27max) MB/s +37%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4315 (4249.57min - 4315.1max) MB/s +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
3237 (3127.1min - 3236.53max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (2608 - 3434, n=8)
3082 MB/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)
2979 MB/s -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2550 (2480.3min - 2550.14max) MB/s -21%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2534 (2495.65min - 2534.16max) MB/s -22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2254 (2201.38min - 2254.23max) MB/s -30%
seq write
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4432 (4395.44min - 4431.7max) MB/s +52%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3877 (3852.68min - 3877.42max) MB/s +33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)
3127 MB/s +7%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (2700 - 3445, n=8)
3030 MB/s +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3024 (2941.45min - 3024.09max) MB/s +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
2916 (2664.35min - 2915.5max) MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2330 (2272.26min - 2329.73max) MB/s -20%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1505 (1276.71min - 1504.84max) MB/s -48%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7107 (6650.61min - 7107.46max) MB/s +38%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
6418 (5867.84min - 6417.66max) MB/s +25%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (4845 - 6188, n=8)
5617 MB/s +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)
5465 MB/s +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
5148 (4531.57min - 5148.3max) MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4921 (3974.96min - 4921.18max) MB/s -4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
4899 (4572.84min - 4898.89max) MB/s -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
3727 (3040.66min - 3726.94max) MB/s -28%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5249 (5168.16min - 5248.53max) MB/s +34%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4927 (1087.79min - 4927.05max) MB/s +26%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (3448 - 4698, n=8)
4251 MB/s +8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)
4195 MB/s +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
3925 (3848.76min - 3924.82max) MB/s
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3880 (3869.46min - 3880.36max) MB/s -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3326 (3267.12min - 3325.66max) MB/s -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2409 (2377.61min - 2408.59max) MB/s -39%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
81.5 (81.19min - 81.46max) MB/s +59%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
77.3 (74.57min - 77.3max) MB/s +51%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)
63.4 MB/s +24%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
61.4 (58.57min - 61.39max) MB/s +20%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (46.5 - 83.6, n=8)
61 MB/s +19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
60.7 (60.49min - 60.66max) MB/s +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
54.8 (51.93min - 54.84max) MB/s +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
51.2 (49.25min - 51.22max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
378 (372.97min - 377.71max) MB/s +445%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
279 (266.75min - 279.17max) MB/s +302%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
202 (200.14min - 201.86max) MB/s +191%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
193 (186.4min - 192.95max) MB/s +178%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)
172 MB/s +148%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
167.2 (164.63min - 167.17max) MB/s +141%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (69.4 - 165.9, n=8)
122 MB/s +76%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
69.4 (65.86min - 69.42max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3839 (3251.93min - 3838.52max) MB/s +892%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2928 (2922.85min - 2927.86max) MB/s +657%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2923 (2892.49min - 2922.92max) MB/s +655%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1684 (1639.23min - 1684.06max) MB/s +335%
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)
1407 MB/s +264%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (387 - 997, n=8)
772 MB/s +99%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
663 (616.18min - 663.42max) MB/s +71%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
387 (351.99min - 386.95max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3115 (3077.16min - 3114.78max) MB/s +1254%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3063 (2744.16min - 3062.6max) MB/s +1232%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1380 (1115.15min - 1380.3max) MB/s +500%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1142 (1093.19min - 1142.3max) MB/s +397%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)
1059 MB/s +360%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
491 (479.11min - 490.6max) MB/s +113%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (230 - 613, n=8)
418 MB/s +82%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
230 (216.81min - 229.87max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
7876 Points +102%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7524 Points +93%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
7463 Points +92%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)
5101 Points +31%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4549 Points +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
4369 Points +12%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (3328 - 4794, n=8)
3939 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
3893 Points
Score Read
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2901 Points +227%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2885 Points +225%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2677 Points +202%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)
1646 Points +86%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1511 Points +70%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1314 Points +48%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (887 - 1351, n=8)
1074 Points +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
887 Points
Score Write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3532 Points +35%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3528 Points +35%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
3132 Points +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)
2674 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2650 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
2619 Points
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (1785 - 2825, n=8)
2365 Points -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2107 Points -20%
Seq Read
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
5796.32 MB/s +23%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5528.24 MB/s +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
4728 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)
4257 MB/s -10%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
4105 MB/s -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3992.32 MB/s -16%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (2676 - 4728, n=8)
3992 MB/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
3252 MB/s -31%
Seq Write
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4720.45 MB/s +61%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4449.45 MB/s +52%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3445 MB/s +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
2934 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)
2791 MB/s -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2714 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (1873 - 2934, n=8)
2608 MB/s -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1951.27 MB/s -33%
4K Read
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
97.4 MB/s +52%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
69.33 MB/s +8%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
66.45 MB/s +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
64.1 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (56.9 - 75.5, n=8)
62.9 MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)
62 MB/s -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
59.9 MB/s -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
46.9 MB/s -27%
4K Write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
328 MB/s +103%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
230.09 MB/s +42%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
221.3 MB/s +37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)
190.9 MB/s +18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
182.5 MB/s +13%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (148.9 - 228, n=8)
179.2 MB/s +11%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
178.71 MB/s +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
161.7 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2377 MB/s +579%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2255.03 MB/s +544%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2054.46 MB/s +487%
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)
1158 MB/s +231%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1138 MB/s +225%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
855.29 MB/s +144%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (350 - 815, n=8)
612 MB/s +75%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
350 MB/s
4K-64 Write
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2904.81 MB/s +34%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2859 MB/s +32%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2430.22 MB/s +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2233.12 MB/s +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)
2204 MB/s +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
2164 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (1378 - 2365, n=8)
1929 MB/s -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1653 MB/s -24%
Access Time Read
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (0.025 - 0.12, n=8)
0.073 ms * -97%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)
0.05499 ms * -49%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
0.053 ms * -43%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.047 ms * -27%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.037 ms * -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
0.037 ms *
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
0.029 ms * +22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
0.022 ms * +41%
Access Time Write
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
0.101 ms * -288%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.068 ms * -162%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)
0.06101 ms * -135%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
0.053 ms * -104%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (0.018 - 0.079, n=8)
0.04475 ms * -72%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
0.031 ms * -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
0.026 ms *
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.017 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03106209301240155018602170248027903100341037204030434046504960527055805890Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5265 (4532.36-6169.85)

图形卡

GPU-Z 英特尔弧形图形处理器
GPU-Z 英特尔弧形图形处理器

我们的测试设备没有配备专用显卡,因此只能依靠配备 8 个 Xe 核心的全新 Arc Graphics(配备 8 个 Xe 内核)。与旧版的 Iris Xe Graphics G7得益于其高功耗限制,其结果令人印象深刻,IdeaPad 实际上是我们迄今为止测试过的配备新 Arc Graphics 的最快设备之一。新的 Arc Graphics 甚至击败了 AMD 的 Radeon 780M在合成测试中。

在游戏测试中,我们注意到 IdeaPad 没有出现掉帧问题。显然,这些问题主要发生在功耗较低的慢速系统中。测试还表明,英特尔在驱动程序方面还有待改进,因为我们在游戏测试中没有发现 Radeon 780M 的真正优势。即便如此,它的整体游戏性能还是不错的,你可以在 1080p 下玩各种中高细节的游戏。即使是当前的游戏,如《赛博朋克 2077》,也能正常运行,但细节较低。如果游戏支持 XeSS 升频软件,您甚至可以通过使用该软件提高笔记本电脑的性能。

在连续负载或电池模式下,其图形性能也不会降低。更多 GPU 基准测试请访问移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
64.4 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
63.3 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.8 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
56.6 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
55.2 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
49.7 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
34.9 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
34.9 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years)
20510 Points +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13539 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13381 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
13316 Points -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12520 Points -8%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8064 - 13716, n=35)
11984 Points -11%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11636 Points -14%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
7389 Points -45%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
7389 Points -45%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years)
14739 Points +52%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9692 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9650 Points 0%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8796 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8438 Points -13%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5568 - 9692, n=39)
8302 Points -14%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7156 Points -26%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
5988 Points -38%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
5982 Points -38%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years)
5566 Points +48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3770 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3656 Points -3%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3511 Points -7%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (2018 - 3770, n=42)
3231 Points -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2847 Points -24%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2363 Points -37%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1782 Points -53%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1782 Points -53%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (10769 - 122560, n=86, last 2 years)
60430 Points +81%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33472 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
32710 Points -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32496 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32336 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
31117 Points -7%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (17193 - 37639, n=41)
30130 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
20674 Points -38%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
20293 Points -39%
Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
Average of class Multimedia
  (9994 - 116455, n=61, last 2 years)
53765 Points +50%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35957 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35855 Points 0%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35606 Points -1%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (17911 - 39941, n=41)
32332 Points -10%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
26557 Points -26%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
26058 Points -28%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
17221 Points -52%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
17018 Points -53%
3DMark 11 Performance
13943 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9084 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4176 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
460 Seconds * -36%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (294 - 692, n=38)
430 Seconds * -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (167 - 946, n=87, last 2 years)
424 Seconds * -25%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
421 Seconds * -24%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
380 Seconds * -12%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
374 Seconds * -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
344 Seconds * -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
339 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
56.7 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
55.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
55 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
54.1 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45.3 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
43.6 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.5 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54.6 fps +114%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
30.5 (28min, 28.99P1) fps +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.5 (24min, 24P1) fps
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.2 (22min) fps -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.1 (23min, 24P1) fps -2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
20.4 (18min) fps -20%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.8 (16min, 16P1) fps -34%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
15.5 (14min, 14P1) fps -39%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years)
54 fps +238%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
27.2 (3.56min, 19.2P1) fps +70%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21 (3.16min, 14.5P1) fps +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
16 (2.73min, 11.4P1) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
15.9 (2.93min, 11.4P1) fps -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.8 (4.99min, 6.13P1) fps -32%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.6 (3.8min) fps -34%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years)
52 fps +70%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
30.6 fps 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
30.5 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.4 fps -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
27 fps -11%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.6 fps -19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21.2 fps -30%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
19.1 fps -37%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=81, last 2 years)
89.9 fps +63%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
55 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
53 fps -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
48.1 (10.9min, 15.3P1) fps -13%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46.1 (5min, 20.8P1) fps -16%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
41.3 (7.5min, 9.37P1) fps -25%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.5 (5.9min, 8.29P1) fps -48%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.3 (5.5min, 8.1P1) fps -49%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=83, last 2 years)
96.5 fps +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
80.6 (55.9min) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
79.8 (51.5min) fps -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
76.8 (67.2min) fps -5%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
75.6 (49.1min) fps -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
65.6 (56.3min) fps -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
65 (54.9min) fps -19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
61.4 (52min) fps -24%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=83, last 2 years)
66.9 fps +100%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39.8 fps +19%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39.5 fps +18%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
37.8 fps +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
33.5 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
32.4 fps -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
31 fps -7%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
30.3 fps -10%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0510152025Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø25.5 (24-28)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 174.1 169.3 40.3 16
The Witcher 3 (2015) 160 99 58 25.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 103.8 95.5 85.2 80.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 85.9 45.2 30.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 52.6 40.8 33.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 91 54 49 46 33
Strange Brigade (2018) 207 88 74 55
F1 23 (2023) 82.1 75.3 50.7 14.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 36.5 28.4 24.6 21.9

排放 - IdeaPad 在负载情况下声音过大

噪音排放

两个风扇
两个风扇

在空闲模式和要求不高的任务中,这两个风扇经常处于关闭或几乎听不到的状态。然而,一旦处理器或 iGPU 承受更大的压力,设备的声音就会迅速变大。在各种测试场景中,我们测得的噪音介于 36.5 分贝(A)和最高 44.4 分贝(A)之间,这对于没有 dGPU 的配置来说已经相当大了。在性能模式下,我们测得的最大噪音为 46.4 分贝(A),而在省电模式下,我们测得的噪音为 32.8 分贝(A)。测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
24.1 / 24.1 / 28.2 dB(A)
Load
44.4 / 44.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.1 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.841.945.53437.52531.335.636.830.232.93132.431.132.328.8314034.73035.12732.55029.627.127.129.130.36326.627.12727.228.88024.52623.322.126.21002526.321.120.226.912524.328.122.220.827.216022.625.418.11823.220024.528.521.921.426.325026.230.422.319.427.231525.131.719.115.126.140026.832.618.612.727.150027.635.217.911.327.163026.932.717.811.22680026.632.817.710.326.7100026.533.417.210.226.4125026.434.317.610.226.8160026.534.617.110.527.4200026.534.115.910.826.8250024.233.314.711.325.6315022.632.914.411.823.8400021.830.214.311.821.6500020.529.614.112.420.6630018.629.213.712.318.5800015.425.913.612.515.61000014.623.813.412.714.71250014.118.814.212.313.61600013.116.113.311.912.6SPL36.544.428.224.136.9N2.54.910.62.6median 24.5median 30.4median 17.2median 12.3median 26.1Delta3.53.82.72.13.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
Noise
14%
9%
-5%
1%
-3%
off / environment *
24.1
23.2
4%
24.4
-1%
24.5
-2%
23.4
3%
25.3
-5%
Idle Minimum *
24.1
23.2
4%
24.4
-1%
24.5
-2%
24.1
-0%
25.3
-5%
Idle Average *
24.1
23.2
4%
24.4
-1%
26.3
-9%
24.3
-1%
25.3
-5%
Idle Maximum *
28.2
24
15%
24.4
13%
26.3
7%
28
1%
25.3
10%
Load Average *
44.4
28
37%
32
28%
36.5
18%
41
8%
43.5
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
36.5
31.9
13%
30.6
16%
46.3
-27%
40.9
-12%
Load Maximum *
44.4
36.2
18%
39.7
11%
52.9
-19%
40.9
8%
50.75
-14%

* ... smaller is better

温度

大风扇的优势体现在笔记本电脑的表面温度上,因为即使在游戏和压力测试中,笔记本电脑的表面温度依然很低,我们在任何时候测量的温度都没有超过 39 °C。因此,高转速风扇其实并无必要。在综合 CPU/iGPU 负载的压力测试中,处理器的功耗在最初的 70 瓦后迅速稳定在 55 瓦,并保持在这一水平。

CPU/iGPU 数据压力测试
CPU/iGPU 数据压力测试
Max. Load
 35.7 °C36.3 °C32.6 °C 
 34.5 °C34.6 °C29.1 °C 
 24 °C25.2 °C24.6 °C 
Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 30.7 °C
39.1 °C37.8 °C29.8 °C
31.5 °C38.3 °C28.1 °C
24.5 °C25.1 °C24.8 °C
Maximum: 39.1 °C
Average: 31 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44.4 °C | Room Temperature 19.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.6 °C / 6.4 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
-9%
-10%
-11%
-19%
-53%
Maximum Upper Side *
36.3
40.3
-11%
40.3
-11%
48.8
-34%
41.6
-15%
51.5
-42%
Maximum Bottom *
39.1
45.1
-15%
45.9
-17%
47.6
-22%
46.6
-19%
62.4
-60%
Idle Upper Side *
24.9
26.6
-7%
26.3
-6%
24.2
3%
30.4
-22%
41.7
-67%
Idle Bottom *
26.1
27.1
-4%
27.9
-7%
23.6
10%
31
-19%
37.2
-43%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

立体声扬声器(2x 2 瓦)提供了合理的音效,在我们的对比组中也属于较好的。当然,笔记本电脑中也有更好的音响系统,但这些通常是高价多媒体设备的专利,如 MacBook Pro 16 或华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034462530.237.63128.838.3402741.75029.131.36327.229.58022.129.610020.232.512520.8381601837.320021.446.925019.45431515.162.940012.768.350011.369.263011.270.580010.373100010.271.4125010.269.5160010.566.7200010.870.8250011.367.7315011.867.6400011.864.1500012.469.3630012.369.7800012.567.51000012.768.21250012.3671600011.967.4SPL24.181.1N0.652.6median 12.3median 67.6Delta2.16.53534.526.930.83030.12831.126.22625.424.417.930.316.236.514.643.512.144.913.15214.854.41659.512.365.110.166.310.270.89.376.59.2749.573.59.766.610.368.310.770.911.273.211.574.111.869.31266.512.16912.269.611.966.811.566.123.283.50.558.9median 11.8median 66.81.85.937.740.428.937.130.933.438.533.429.233.527.933.823.237.624.142.819.147.21949.818.354.718.559.51663.41566.111.366.510.771.310.37810.176.49.973.410.671.110.970.711.665.611.665.311.967.612.167.612.474.812.570.712.469.612.466.111.657.424.283.80.660.2median 12.1median 66.52.35.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9Huawei MateBook D 16 2024Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 强大的耐力

耗电量

IdeaPad Pro 5 16 的闲置功耗相当低,最高仅为 9.9 瓦。在压力测试中,我们测得一开始的峰值功耗为 101 瓦,大约 1.5 分钟后,功耗降至 88 瓦。游戏时的功耗为 60-90 瓦(取决于 CPU 负载)。因此,所提供的 100 瓦电源装置仍然足够强大。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.38 / 0.52 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.5 / 9.6 / 9.9 Watt
Load midlight 62.7 / 101.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
2%
-18%
-4%
-15%
-28%
-7%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
3.5
4.7
-34%
4.2
-20%
3
14%
7.1
-103%
5.73
-64%
5.41 ?(1.8 - 10.3, n=37)
-55%
Idle Average *
9.6
9.5
1%
11.6
-21%
9.5
1%
10.1
-5%
14.5
-51%
8.64 ?(4.2 - 16, n=37)
10%
Idle Maximum *
9.9
10.1
-2%
12.3
-24%
12
-21%
18.6
-88%
15.6
-58%
12.1 ?(4.5 - 49, n=37)
-22%
Load Average *
62.7
49.7
21%
61.9
1%
68.3
-9%
45.3
28%
40.5
35%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55.8
60
-8%
57
-2%
59.8
-7%
39.5
29%
74.9
-34%
Load Maximum *
101.2
66.3
34%
140.6
-39%
104.8
-4%
52.9
48%
94
7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø55.8 (54.1-57.8)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø95.3 (81.7-101.8)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.14 (6.13-8.63)

Power consumption with external monitor

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø89.4 (75.2-99.2)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø96.4 (95.8-98.1)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø30 (24.5-51.6)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø96.5 (95.5-97.9)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø59.9 (57.7-63)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø50.6 (48.4-52.9)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.38 (4.06-7.67)

运行时间

84 瓦时电池使 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 在远离电源插座的情况下也能保持良好的运行时间。在我们的 WLAN 测试中,测试亮度为 150 cd/m²(相当于测试设备最大亮度的 67%),刷新率为 60 Hz,测试设备的运行时间为 12:36 小时(120 Hz 时为 11:28 小时),在全亮度下的运行时间为 09:46 小时(120 Hz 时为 08:11 小时)。在 150 cd/m² 下的视频测试中,新的 Meteor Lake 芯片的优势再次显现,我们注意到它的续航时间略低于 16 小时。不过,在负载情况下,如果你愿意,68 分钟即可耗尽电池。在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要 93 分钟,53 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量。

电池信息
电池信息
充电曲线
充电曲线
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
12h 36min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
9h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 08min
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-1%
50%
95%
-56%
43%
6%
H.264
957
835
-13%
1308
37%
537
-44%
WiFi v1.3
756
674
-11%
983
30%
1100
46%
336
-56%
510
-33%
Load
68
83
22%
124
82%
166
144%
209
207%

Pros

+ 高效稳定的性能(CPU 和 iGPU)
+ 雷电 4 和 HDMI 2.1
+ 色彩还原准确
+ IPS 面板无 PWM 闪烁
+ 运行时间长
+ 两个固态硬盘插槽
+ 表面温度低

Cons

- 焊接内存
- 键盘声音略大
- iGPU 机型的风扇声音较大

结论 - 非常好的流星湖实施方案

联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 评测。测试设备由联想提供:
联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 评测。测试设备由联想提供:

联想的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 是一款大型多媒体笔记本电脑,它能很好地利用新的流星湖处理器,在任何方面都没有真正的失误。它的性能很好,我们注意到与 AMD Ryzen 处理器相比,它在这方面没有什么大的区别,这就是为什么你的选择很可能取决于它的可用性和价格。这款笔记本配备了新的 Arc Graphics 系列中速度最快的型号之一,我们在测试中没有发现任何图形性能问题。

不过,我们注意到测试样本的铰链发出了一些嘎吱嘎吱的响声,影响了其原本良好的质量。尽管这款屏幕有很多优点(色彩准确、磨砂表面、120 Hz、响应时间快、无 PWM 闪烁),但它也不是没有缺点--主观地说,它的画质无法与高质量的 IPS 面板(如红米笔记本 Pro 16 16)相比。 红米笔记本 Pro 16)或 OLED 屏幕相比。它可以配备 OLED 显示屏,但只能提供略高于全高清的分辨率。

IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 可以很好地利用英特尔的新款流星湖处理器,但在其 IPS 显示屏方面,我们希望它能采用质量稍高的面板。相比之下,这款大型多媒体笔记本电脑在运行时间和连接选项方面没有任何失误。

其他优势还包括该笔记本电脑的第二个 M.2 固态硬盘插槽以及非常出色的电池续航时间--尤其是在亮度调整后的情况下。另一方面,它的内存是焊接上去的,如果你选择 16GB 内存的基本配置,这可能会带来特别大的问题。您可以选择为 IdeaPad Pro 配备专用图形处理器(最多为 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑不过,我们不知道这对设备的排放有什么影响。在我们的 iGPU 机型上,我们测得的表面温度超低,即使在负载情况下也是如此,这肯定会留下一些呼吸空间--但其风扇的声音已经非常大了。总之,它的整体包装不如 14 英寸机型吸引人。 14 英寸机型价格较高也是原因之一。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

新款 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 可通过联想网站直接配置和购买。AMD 版本目前的报价为 914.99 美元。

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 - 05/06/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
80 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 86%
Weight
64 / 20-72 → 85%
Battery
90 / 95 → 94%
Display
84%
Games Performance
82 / 90 → 91%
Application Performance
95 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
94%
Noise
85 / 95 → 90%
Audio
81%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Average
80%
88%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 评测--配备 120 Hz 显示屏和酷睿 7 处理器的多媒体笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-05- 8 (Update: 2024-05- 8)