联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 评测--配备 120 Hz 显示屏和酷睿 7 处理器的多媒体笔记本电脑
IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 是一款采用最新硬件的大型多媒体笔记本电脑,联想让买家在英特尔当前的酷睿 Ultra 处理器和 AMD 的 Ryzen 8000 芯片之间进行选择。在之前测试了 较小的 14 英寸机型处理器的 14 英寸机型,现在我们将对配备最新 酷睿至尊 7 155H包括弧形图形处理器。该机售价约为 1,400 美元,配备 32 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘以及分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素的 120-Hz IPS 雾面面板。您还可以选择配备 Nvidia 专用 GPU 的 IdeaPad(如RTX 3050 笔记本电脑& RTX 4050 笔记本电脑).
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
89.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 19.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
84.9 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1620 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 铝制,有轻微的吱吱声
联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 采用光滑的灰色铝制外壳,在专业环境中使用没有任何问题。它的边框很薄,但确实有一个摄像头驼峰,不是特别吸引人。但它至少是实用的,因为它可以让你非常轻松地打开笔记本的盖子。在设备光滑的表面上,指纹痕迹也不是什么大问题。
在质量方面,IdeaPad Pro 表现出色,不过,我们在操作测试设备时确实注意到其铰链偶尔会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音。说到铰链,它们一般都调整得很好,最大开启角度约为 170 度。底座非常稳定,而当我们对机盖施加很大压力时,显示屏上会出现一些轻微的波纹。
就尺寸而言,竞争对手之间的差别不大,只有微星 Prestige 的机身明显更深一些。不过,我们的测试设备重量略低于 1.9 千克,与红米笔记本 Pro 一起成为最重的设备之一。100 瓦电源的重量增加了 385 克。
连接性 - Thunderbolt 4 和 HDMI 2.1
联想为 IdeaPad 配备了所有重要的连接。英特尔机型配备了现代的 Thunderbolt 4 连接,而其中一个 USB-C 端口必须用于供电。配备 Nvidia GPU 的配置在左侧有一个额外的 SlimTip 连接,用于更强大的电源。在日常使用中,您可能会对两个普通 USB-A 端口感到满意,而无需使用适配器。
SD 读卡器
设备右侧有一个功能齐全的 SD 读卡器,与我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)配合使用,可实现 75-85 MB/s 的平均传输速率。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U (AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U (AV Pro V60) |
交流
联想安装了最新的 WiFi 6E 适配器,即英特尔的 AX211 模块。在我们的测试中,它使用华硕的参考路由器提供了很高且稳定的传输速率。在实际使用中,我们也从未遇到过信号强度方面的问题。IdeaPad 不支持 Wi-Fi 7。
Networking | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
网络摄像头
现在,几乎所有的联想笔记本电脑都有一个摄像头驼峰,新款 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 也不例外。它的 1080p 摄像头能在良好的光线条件下拍摄出漂亮的照片,而且还配备了机械盖。此外,它还可以访问红外传感器,通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。此外,它还支持所有新的网络摄像头工作室特效(柔焦、眼神接触、头部跟踪)--AMD 型号也是如此。
维护
底盖由 Torx 螺钉(T5)固定。在内部,你可以访问紧凑型 M.2-2242 固态硬盘和一个额外的 M.2-2280 插槽(均为 PCIe 4.0),通过它们可以廉价地扩展笔记本电脑的存储空间。如果需要,还可以更换 WLAN 模块和电池,而内存模块则是焊接上去的。
输入设备 - 专用数字键盘
IdeaPad Pro 5 16 的深灰色键盘打字手感与较小的 14 英寸机型相同。 14 英寸机型一样、这意味着它仅次于更昂贵的 ThinkPad 或优秀的竞争对手,如 小米红米笔记本 Pro.它的键程足够大,按键也很精确,但总的来说,键盘给人的感觉有点摇摇欲坠,键帽也需要更坚固一些。此外,较大的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 配备了专用数字键盘和两种强度设置的白色背光,可通过传感器自动激活。
点击板的尺寸为 13.5 x 8 厘米,为输入提供了足够的空间。它的表面光滑漂亮,我们在测试过程中使用它没有任何问题,只是按下下部区域时发出的噪音非常大,似乎有点廉价。我们建议您在输入时只需轻敲键盘即可。
显示屏 - 120 赫兹 IPS
购买 16 英寸联想笔记本电脑的用户可以选择 OLED 面板或 IPS 面板,这两种面板的技术规格差别很大。我们的测试设备配备的是分辨率较高的 IPS 面板(2560 x 1600 像素),但亮度只有 350 尼特,覆盖范围为 sRGB。而 OLED 面板的分辨率要低得多(2,048 x 1,280 像素),但亮度可达 400 尼特,并覆盖 P3 色彩空间。主观而言,IPS 面板看起来还不错,但色彩显得有些苍白。在这方面,IdeaPad 无法与 OLED 面板或安装在红米笔记本 Pro 上的 P3-IPS 面板相比。不过,光照区域不会出现颗粒感,我们也没有注意到 IPS 面板闪烁的现象,其响应时间也非常快。移动也得益于其更高的频率(120 Hz)。
该面板的平均亮度为 368 cd/m²,超过了制造商提供的数值,其黑色值为 0.31 cd/m²,最大对比度接近 1,200:1。这些数值尚可,但仅此而已。背光出血问题不大。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 368 cd/m²
Contrast: 1187:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Samsung SDC4180, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | 33% | 29% | 39% | 36% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.3 | 66.7 5% | 98.8 56% | 96.7 53% | 99.9 58% | 99.93 58% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.2 | 96.5 1% | 100 5% | 99.8 5% | 100 5% | 100 5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.3 | 68.8 5% | 89.9 38% | 84.6 30% | 100 53% | 95.52 46% |
Response Times | -102% | -102% | -229% | 93% | 84% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15 ? | 31 ? -107% | 39.2 ? -161% | 49.4 ? -229% | 0.57 ? 96% | 2 ? 87% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.3 ? | 20.3 ? -97% | 14.6 ? -42% | 33.9 ? -229% | 1 ? 90% | 2 ? 81% |
PWM Frequency | 238.8 | 240 | ||||
Screen | -1% | 5% | -7% | 2% | 154% | |
Brightness middle | 368 | 349 -5% | 520 41% | 473.6 29% | 379.8 3% | 370.4 1% |
Brightness | 368 | 340 -8% | 510 39% | 456 24% | 383 4% | 376 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 80 -12% | 93 2% | 87 -4% | 98 8% | 96 5% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.24 23% | 0.35 -13% | 0.19 39% | 0.02 94% | |
Contrast | 1187 | 1454 22% | 1486 25% | 2493 110% | 18520 1460% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.8 -17% | 2.9 -21% | 5.9 -146% | 4.7 -96% | 1.51 37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.5 | 7.3 -12% | 6.2 5% | 9.37 -44% | 7.51 -16% | 2.89 56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 0.7 12% | 1.1 -38% | 0.89 -11% | 0.55 31% | 3.36 -320% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.9 -9% | 4.3 4% | 7.3 -62% | 0.8 82% | 2.1 53% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.19 100% | 1.9 116% | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6324 103% | 7328 89% | 7422 88% | 7260 90% | 6381 102% | 6536 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -33% /
-14% | -21% /
-4% | -69% /
-31% | 45% /
27% | 91% /
119% |
* ... smaller is better
其制造商的校准结果显示没有重大的色彩偏差,但我们测量到了轻微的红色色调,而且色温有点过高。通过我们自己的校准,我们可以大大改善屏幕的显示效果(可在上面免费下载相应的配置文件),从而实现极低的灰度和色彩偏差。加上其全面的 sRGB 覆盖范围,你可以很好地编辑照片和视频。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.6 ms rise | |
↘ 4.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.4 ms rise | |
↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在室外,你很快就会发现显示屏的亮度非常有限,需要更高的亮度才能让你在明亮的日子里舒适地在室外工作。在可视角度方面,只有从对角线上方观看 IPS 面板时,你才会发现对比度会有相当大的下降,但这在日常使用中应该不会造成影响。
性能 - Core Ultra 7,LPDDR5x 内存
测试条件
联想提供了所有我们熟悉的能源配置文件(省电模式、自动模式、性能模式),但性能模式在没有专用 GPU 的配置中没有任何优势,只是风扇的声音更大。因此,我们使用预设的自动模式进行了以下基准测试和测量。省电模式也可用于简单的任务,不会出现任何问题,因为可以通过组合键 Fn+Q 轻松切换不同的配置文件。
处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H
酷睿至尊 7 155H 酷睿至尊 7 155H是英特尔最新一代流星湖处理器的一部分,也是继 酷睿 i7-13700H.在 IdeaPad Pro 5 中,该处理器的短时功耗为 70 瓦,长时间负载时功耗为 50 瓦。这使得它的多核性能非常出色,总体上略高于较小的 IdeaPad Pro 5 14的 Ryzen 7 8845HS(60/50 瓦)略胜一筹。其单核性能也同样出色,不过你应该知道,与旧款 Raptor Lake 芯片相比,Meteor Lake 芯片并没有真正提高性能,但由于改变了内核架构,它们在低负载时的工作效率要高得多。在电池模式下,CPU 的性能保持稳定。更多 CPU 基准测试可在 我们的技术部分。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=47) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=47) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=45) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=45) | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=51) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=47) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=43) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=45) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=45) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 22544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=50) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=47) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=47) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=47) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=45) | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40.9 - 79.2, n=44) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=44) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=45) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=45) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=45) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=45) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=45) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=45) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=45) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=45) | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=45) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=45) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
系统性能
主观而言,这款笔记本电脑的性能令人印象深刻,输入执行时没有明显的延迟,但公平地说,几乎所有现代设备都是如此。它的内存不能升级,如果你决定选择配备 16GB 内存的机型,就应该考虑到这一点。您最多可以选择 32 GB 内存。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7186 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=45) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=45) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=45) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (120.2 - 233, n=45) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有显示出任何限制。虽然有一个驱动程序出现了偏差,但重要的 "中断到处理延迟 "值很低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试样品配备了三星公司生产的 M.2-2242 固态硬盘(PM9C1a),存储容量为 1 TB。PCIe-4.0 固态硬盘的传输速率非常高,即使在长时间负载的情况下,我们也没有发现任何限制。用户可以使用另一个 M.2-2280 插槽(也是 PCIe 4.0)进行简单的存储扩展。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
我们的测试设备没有配备专用显卡,因此只能依靠配备 8 个 Xe 核心的全新 Arc Graphics(配备 8 个 Xe 内核)。与旧版的 Iris Xe Graphics G7得益于其高功耗限制,其结果令人印象深刻,IdeaPad 实际上是我们迄今为止测试过的配备新 Arc Graphics 的最快设备之一。新的 Arc Graphics 甚至击败了 AMD 的 Radeon 780M在合成测试中。
在游戏测试中,我们注意到 IdeaPad 没有出现掉帧问题。显然,这些问题主要发生在功耗较低的慢速系统中。测试还表明,英特尔在驱动程序方面还有待改进,因为我们在游戏测试中没有发现 Radeon 780M 的真正优势。即便如此,它的整体游戏性能还是不错的,你可以在 1080p 下玩各种中高细节的游戏。即使是当前的游戏,如《赛博朋克 2077》,也能正常运行,但细节较低。如果游戏支持 XeSS 升频软件,您甚至可以通过使用该软件提高笔记本电脑的性能。
在连续负载或电池模式下,其图形性能也不会降低。更多 GPU 基准测试请访问移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 。
3DMark 11 Performance | 13943 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9084 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4176 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (294 - 692, n=38) | |
Average of class Multimedia (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 174.1 | 169.3 | 40.3 | 16 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 160 | 99 | 58 | 25.5 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 103.8 | 95.5 | 85.2 | 80.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 85.9 | 45.2 | 30.5 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 52.6 | 40.8 | 33.5 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 91 | 54 | 49 | 46 | 33 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 207 | 88 | 74 | 55 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 82.1 | 75.3 | 50.7 | 14.3 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 36.5 | 28.4 | 24.6 | 21.9 |
排放 - IdeaPad 在负载情况下声音过大
噪音排放
在空闲模式和要求不高的任务中,这两个风扇经常处于关闭或几乎听不到的状态。然而,一旦处理器或 iGPU 承受更大的压力,设备的声音就会迅速变大。在各种测试场景中,我们测得的噪音介于 36.5 分贝(A)和最高 44.4 分贝(A)之间,这对于没有 dGPU 的配置来说已经相当大了。在性能模式下,我们测得的最大噪音为 46.4 分贝(A),而在省电模式下,我们测得的噪音为 32.8 分贝(A)。测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.1 / 24.1 / 28.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44.4 / 44.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.1 dB(A) |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 14% | 9% | -5% | 1% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 24.1 | 23.2 4% | 24.4 -1% | 24.5 -2% | 23.4 3% | 25.3 -5% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.1 | 23.2 4% | 24.4 -1% | 24.5 -2% | 24.1 -0% | 25.3 -5% |
Idle Average * | 24.1 | 23.2 4% | 24.4 -1% | 26.3 -9% | 24.3 -1% | 25.3 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.2 | 24 15% | 24.4 13% | 26.3 7% | 28 1% | 25.3 10% |
Load Average * | 44.4 | 28 37% | 32 28% | 36.5 18% | 41 8% | 43.5 2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.5 | 31.9 13% | 30.6 16% | 46.3 -27% | 40.9 -12% | |
Load Maximum * | 44.4 | 36.2 18% | 39.7 11% | 52.9 -19% | 40.9 8% | 50.75 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
大风扇的优势体现在笔记本电脑的表面温度上,因为即使在游戏和压力测试中,笔记本电脑的表面温度依然很低,我们在任何时候测量的温度都没有超过 39 °C。因此,高转速风扇其实并无必要。在综合 CPU/iGPU 负载的压力测试中,处理器的功耗在最初的 70 瓦后迅速稳定在 55 瓦,并保持在这一水平。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.6 °C / 6.4 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -9% | -10% | -11% | -19% | -53% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 36.3 | 40.3 -11% | 40.3 -11% | 48.8 -34% | 41.6 -15% | 51.5 -42% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39.1 | 45.1 -15% | 45.9 -17% | 47.6 -22% | 46.6 -19% | 62.4 -60% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.9 | 26.6 -7% | 26.3 -6% | 24.2 3% | 30.4 -22% | 41.7 -67% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.1 | 27.1 -4% | 27.9 -7% | 23.6 10% | 31 -19% | 37.2 -43% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
立体声扬声器(2x 2 瓦)提供了合理的音效,在我们的对比组中也属于较好的。当然,笔记本电脑中也有更好的音响系统,但这些通常是高价多媒体设备的专利,如 MacBook Pro 16 或华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16。
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 强大的耐力
耗电量
IdeaPad Pro 5 16 的闲置功耗相当低,最高仅为 9.9 瓦。在压力测试中,我们测得一开始的峰值功耗为 101 瓦,大约 1.5 分钟后,功耗降至 88 瓦。游戏时的功耗为 60-90 瓦(取决于 CPU 负载)。因此,所提供的 100 瓦电源装置仍然足够强大。
Off / Standby | 0.38 / 0.52 Watt |
Idle | 3.5 / 9.6 / 9.9 Watt |
Load |
62.7 / 101.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | -18% | -4% | -15% | -28% | -7% | -35% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 4.7 -34% | 4.2 -20% | 3 14% | 7.1 -103% | 5.73 -64% | 5.41 ? -55% | 6.78 ? -94% |
Idle Average * | 9.6 | 9.5 1% | 11.6 -21% | 9.5 1% | 10.1 -5% | 14.5 -51% | 8.64 ? 10% | 11.3 ? -18% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.9 | 10.1 -2% | 12.3 -24% | 12 -21% | 18.6 -88% | 15.6 -58% | 12.1 ? -22% | 13.4 ? -35% |
Load Average * | 62.7 | 49.7 21% | 61.9 1% | 68.3 -9% | 45.3 28% | 40.5 35% | 54.2 ? 14% | 71.1 ? -13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 55.8 | 60 -8% | 57 -2% | 59.8 -7% | 39.5 29% | 74.9 -34% | ||
Load Maximum * | 101.2 | 66.3 34% | 140.6 -39% | 104.8 -4% | 52.9 48% | 94 7% | 85 ? 16% | 117.3 ? -16% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
84 瓦时电池使 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 在远离电源插座的情况下也能保持良好的运行时间。在我们的 WLAN 测试中,测试亮度为 150 cd/m²(相当于测试设备最大亮度的 67%),刷新率为 60 Hz,测试设备的运行时间为 12:36 小时(120 Hz 时为 11:28 小时),在全亮度下的运行时间为 09:46 小时(120 Hz 时为 08:11 小时)。在 150 cd/m² 下的视频测试中,新的 Meteor Lake 芯片的优势再次显现,我们注意到它的续航时间略低于 16 小时。不过,在负载情况下,如果你愿意,68 分钟即可耗尽电池。在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要 93 分钟,53 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量。
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -1% | 50% | 95% | -56% | 43% | 4% | |
H.264 | 957 | 835 -13% | 1308 37% | 537 -44% | 821 ? -14% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 756 | 674 -11% | 983 30% | 1100 46% | 336 -56% | 510 -33% | 628 ? -17% |
Load | 68 | 83 22% | 124 82% | 166 144% | 209 207% | 97.8 ? 44% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 非常好的流星湖实施方案
联想的 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 是一款大型多媒体笔记本电脑,它能很好地利用新的流星湖处理器,在任何方面都没有真正的失误。它的性能很好,我们注意到与 AMD Ryzen 处理器相比,它在这方面没有什么大的区别,这就是为什么你的选择很可能取决于它的可用性和价格。这款笔记本配备了新的 Arc Graphics 系列中速度最快的型号之一,我们在测试中没有发现任何图形性能问题。
不过,我们注意到测试样本的铰链发出了一些嘎吱嘎吱的响声,影响了其原本良好的质量。尽管这款屏幕有很多优点(色彩准确、磨砂表面、120 Hz、响应时间快、无 PWM 闪烁),但它也不是没有缺点--主观地说,它的画质无法与高质量的 IPS 面板(如红米笔记本 Pro 16 16)相比。 红米笔记本 Pro 16)或 OLED 屏幕相比。它可以配备 OLED 显示屏,但只能提供略高于全高清的分辨率。
IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 可以很好地利用英特尔的新款流星湖处理器,但在其 IPS 显示屏方面,我们希望它能采用质量稍高的面板。相比之下,这款大型多媒体笔记本电脑在运行时间和连接选项方面没有任何失误。
其他优势还包括该笔记本电脑的第二个 M.2 固态硬盘插槽以及非常出色的电池续航时间--尤其是在亮度调整后的情况下。另一方面,它的内存是焊接上去的,如果你选择 16GB 内存的基本配置,这可能会带来特别大的问题。您可以选择为 IdeaPad Pro 配备专用图形处理器(最多为 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑不过,我们不知道这对设备的排放有什么影响。在我们的 iGPU 机型上,我们测得的表面温度超低,即使在负载情况下也是如此,这肯定会留下一些呼吸空间--但其风扇的声音已经非常大了。总之,它的整体包装不如 14 英寸机型吸引人。 14 英寸机型价格较高也是原因之一。
价格和供应情况
新款 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 可通过联想网站直接配置和购买。AMD 版本目前的报价为 914.99 美元。
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
- 05/06/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.