Notebookcheck Logo

小米红米本 Pro 16 2024 评测--也许是电池续航时间最长的流星湖笔记本电脑

性价比冠军。

金属外壳、酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器、32 GB 内存、3K IPS 显示屏和优质键盘，红米笔记本 Pro 16 以不到 1,000 欧元（约合 1,066 美元）的价格提供了所有这些。此外，99 瓦时的大容量电池确保了超长的续航时间，而且还配备了雷电 4。
AI Arc Intel Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

如果不需要专用显卡，小米新推出的红米笔记本 Pro 16 将为多媒体用户和家庭办公提供一款功能强大的高品质 16 英寸笔记本电脑。铝合金机身内置强大的散热系统、英特尔最新的 酷睿至强 7 155H流星湖处理器（包括 Arc 图形处理器）、32 GB 内存、1 TB 大容量固态硬盘，以及亮度为 500 尼特、刷新率为 165 赫兹的哑光高分辨率 IPS 面板。

在德国，该设备可以通过 TradingShenzen 等渠道进口，售价为 997 欧元（约合人民币 1062 元），配备德国 Windows 11 Pro 版本（基本售价：957 欧元，约合人民币 1020 元）。另外，一款配备速度较慢的Core Ultra 5 125H 但其他配置完全相同的机型售价为 907 欧元（约合人民币 967 元）。

请注意，默认情况下，红米笔记本 Pro 16 预装的是中文版 Windows 11，不能更改语言。我们的测试机也是这种情况，这也是我们自己安装德语版操作系统的原因。因此，在购买前应确保获得正确的 Windows 版本。

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Core: 2250 MHz, 31.0.101.5382
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-7467, dual-channel, onboard
Display
16.00 inch 16:9, 3072 x 1920 pixel 226 PPI, TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
YMTC PC300-1TB, 1024 GB 
, 894 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.9 x 355 x 248
Battery
99 Wh, 6362 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 140W PSU
Weight
1.867 kg, Power Supply: 382 g
Price
957 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89.7 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core		1.9 kg15.9 mm16.00"3072x1920
85 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1.7 kg18.4 mm16.00"1920x1200
88.9 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core		1.5 kg12.5 mm16.00"2880x1800
88.1 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core		1.6 kg19.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.6 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M		1.2 kg13 mm16.00"3200x2000
84.9 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1.6 kg19 mm15.60"2880x1620

外壳 - RedmiBook Pro，坚固的铝合金外壳

小米为红米本 Pro 16 采用了银色铝合金外壳。底座两侧略微变薄，使设备看起来非常纤薄，不过它绝对不是想成为市场上最薄的笔记本电脑。凭借纤薄的显示屏边框，该机的设计看起来非常时尚，表面也不会留下指纹。得益于低调的外观，红米笔记本 Pro 在专业环境中使用也没有任何问题。

测试机的质量也给人留下了良好印象，做工没有任何瑕疵。机壳的稳定性整体也不错。只有在试图翘起机箱时，我们才能迫使它发出一些轻微的嘎吱声，键盘中心也能被压得很小。纤薄的显示屏盖子弹性稍差，但我们无法在显示屏上激起任何伪影。铰链调节良好，单手即可轻松掀起盖子。不过，在改变显示屏角度（最大开启角度约为 170 度）时，铰链仍无法完全防止显示屏轻微晃动。

就占地面积而言，红米笔记本 Pro 16 是我们对比组中较为紧凑的机型之一。它重约 1.87 千克（约 4.1 磅），比直接竞争对手略重。不过，红米 Pro 16 的厚度约为 1.6 厘米（约 0.63 英寸），也相对纤薄。连同 USB-C 充电线缆，140 瓦充电器重 382 克（约 13.5 盎司）。

尺寸比较

❌
358 mm 258 mm 19.1 mm 1.6 kg358 mm 231 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg356.7 mm 248.7 mm 18.4 mm 1.7 kg358.2 mm 246.4 mm 13 mm 1.2 kg355 mm 248 mm 15.9 mm 1.9 kg355.4 mm 250.4 mm 12.5 mm 1.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - Thunderbolt 4 和 HDMI 2.1

接口分布在两侧的背面区域，无需接受任何妥协。除了一个 USB-C 端口外，还有一个 Thunderbolt 4 和一个 HDMI 端口。右侧提供了两个普通的 USB-A 端口，因此在日常操作中不需要任何适配器。不过，红米笔记本 Pro 没有配备读卡器或以太网端口。

左侧USB-C 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gb/s、DisplayPort 替代模式、电力传输）、USB-C 4.0（带雷电 4）（40 Gb/s、DisplayPort 替代模式、电力传输）、HDMI 2.1、3.5 毫米音频接口
左侧USB-C 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gb/s、DisplayPort 替代模式、电力传输）、USB-C 4.0（带雷电 4）（40 Gb/s、DisplayPort 替代模式、电力传输）、HDMI 2.1、3.5 毫米音频接口
右侧：2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gb/秒）
右侧：2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gb/秒）

交流

可更换无线局域网模块
可更换无线局域网模块

小米采用了当前的英特尔 AX211 WLAN 模块，该模块除了支持 Wi-Fi 6E 标准外，还支持蓝牙 5.3。不过，制造商似乎在天线方面偷工减料了，因为在我们使用华硕路由器进行的测试中，最大传输速率仅为 850-900 MB/s，仅相当于通常值的一半左右。根据网络连接的情况，你将无法充分发挥它的潜力，不过对于大多数用户来说，这种限制应该是最小的。

Networking
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
671 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
901 (min: 877) MBit/s ∼53%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1658 (min: 1616) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1693 (min: 1623) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1625 (min: 1307) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1666 (min: 1613) MBit/s ∼98%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1144 (min: 654) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1317 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1210 (min: 747) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1111 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼80%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
537 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1443 (min: 1217) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1256 (min: 1053) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1225 (min: 1094) MBit/s ∼88%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 468) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1274 (min: 787) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1391 (min: 670) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø671 (610-705)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø901 (877-918)

网络摄像头

1080p 网络摄像头是红米本 Pro 16 的另一个薄弱环节，因为即使在光线条件良好的情况下，成像质量也只能算一般。与 Meteor Lake 处理器相结合，工作室效果（如背景模糊效果、头部跟踪等）可由操作系统直接支持，与应用程序无关。

ColorChecker
6.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024: 8.55 ∆E min: 2.65 - max: 14.29 ∆E

维护

底部的机箱盖用几颗 Torx 螺钉（T5）固定，可以顺利取下。机箱内部有两个插槽，可容纳紧凑型 M.2-2242 固态硬盘和一个可更换的 WLAN 模块。电池用螺丝固定，必要时可以更换，但工作内存是焊接的。

内部结构
内部结构
主 M.2-2242 固态硬盘，带附加盖板
主 M.2-2242 固态硬盘，带附加盖板
辅助 M.2-2242 插槽
辅助 M.2-2242 插槽

输入设备 - 带照明的优质键盘

红米笔记本 Pro 16 配备了黑色 Chiclet 键盘和三段式白色照明。键盘的质量给人留下了非常好的印象，提供了长键程和精确的输入体验，而且按键也不会发出咔哒声。因此，这是一款非常出色的键盘，与联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 的键盘相比，我们更喜欢它（评测即将发布）。虽然我们的测试机没有专门的数字键区，但有大尺寸方向键和专门的 PgUp/PgDn 键。电源键位于键盘区域外的右上方，还包括指纹传感器。

对于德国用户来说，唯一的问题是国际键盘布局。当然，您可以使用英文输入法，但这在使用元音等符号时会变得复杂。另外，您也可以选择德语布局，但这样您就必须记住按键分配（或许还可以在特殊按键上贴一些贴纸）。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

大尺寸 ClickPad 的尺寸为 15 x 9.5 厘米（约 5.9 x 3.7 英寸），为输入提供了很大的空间，其滑动特性也非常好。在测试过程中，我们在输入方面没有遇到任何问题，如果非要抱怨什么的话，那就是按压键盘底部时发出的 "嗒嗒 "声稍大。

显示屏 - 3K IPS，165 Hz

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
轻微背光出血
轻微背光出血

红米笔记本 Pro 配备了一块 16 英寸超大 IPS 显示屏，分辨率为 3072x1920 像素，格式为 16:10。主观的图像印象非常好，内容看起来非常锐利，色彩也很鲜艳，当然 OLED 面板在这方面更具优势。但这也意味着红米笔记本 Pro 不会出现任何 IPS 闪烁。在明亮的图像区域，你可以察觉到一些微小的颗粒感，但你必须仔细观察才能发现，而且在日常操作中并不恼人。光晕问题不大，响应时间也不明显。由于采用了亮度传感器，图像亮度和色温都可以根据周围的光线条件自动调节。

最大亮度为 526 cd/m²，平均亮度为 510 cd/m²。黑色值略微偏高，为 0.35 cd/m²，但最大对比度仍然达到了很好的 ~1,500:1。它还支持 HDR 内容，但与 OLED 或迷你 LED 面板相比，最大亮度保持不变。

515
cd/m²		520
cd/m²		508
cd/m²
523
cd/m²		520
cd/m²		526
cd/m²
487
cd/m²		494
cd/m²		497
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
TL160MDMP03_0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 526 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 510 cd/m² Minimum: 0.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 520 cd/m²
Contrast: 1486:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"		Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"		MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"		Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Samsung SDC4180, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"
Display
-19%
3%
-3%
4%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
98.8
66.7
-32%
99.5
1%
96.7
-2%
99.9
1%
99.93
1%
sRGB Coverage
100
96.5
-3%
100
0%
99.8
0%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
89.9
68.8
-23%
97.5
8%
84.6
-6%
100
11%
95.52
6%
Response Times
-9%
97%
-79%
96%
91%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.2 ?(15.8, 18.4)
31 ?(14.4, 16.6)
21%
0.64 ?(0.33, 0.31)
98%
49.4 ?(22.6, 26.8)
-26%
0.57 ?(0.28, 0.29)
99%
2 ?(1, 1)
95%
Response Time Black / White *
14.6 ?(4.4, 10.2)
20.3 ?(10.6, 9.7)
-39%
0.68 ?(0.38, 0.3)
95%
33.9 ?(15.6, 18.3)
-132%
1 ?(0.55, 0.45)
93%
2 ?(1, 1)
86%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(100)
238.8
240
Screen
-5%
26%
-13%
0%
126%
Brightness middle
520
349
-33%
385
-26%
473.6
-9%
379.8
-27%
370.4
-29%
Brightness
510
340
-33%
391
-23%
456
-11%
383
-25%
376
-26%
Brightness Distribution
93
80
-14%
97
4%
87
-6%
98
5%
96
3%
Black Level *
0.35
0.24
31%
0.19
46%
0.02
94%
Contrast
1486
1454
-2%
2493
68%
18520
1146%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.9
2.8
3%
1.1
62%
5.9
-103%
4.7
-62%
1.51
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.2
7.3
-18%
1.8
71%
9.37
-51%
7.51
-21%
2.89
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.1
0.7
36%
0.89
19%
0.55
50%
3.36
-205%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.3
4.9
-14%
1.4
67%
7.3
-70%
0.8
81%
2.1
51%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.2 100%
2.24 98%
1.9 116%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
CCT
7422 88%
7328 89%
6444 101%
7260 90%
6381 102%
6536 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-11% / -9%
42% / 32%
-32% / -20%
33% / 17%
73% / 95%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN 灰度（目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 灰度（目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（目标色彩空间：P3）

在使用专业的 CalMAN 软件分析面板时，我们发现在交货状态下的校准并不理想。有明显的蓝色色调，色温也过低，有几种颜色偏离了目标值。不过，这些设置有助于提高最大亮度，因为校准后最大亮度从 520 cd/m² 降至约 490 cd/m²。另一方面，校准后显示屏的整体性能有了大幅提升。您可以从上面的链接下载相应的免费配置文件。不过，即使经过校准，100% 蓝光的高偏差仍然存在。因此，该设备并不适合图像处理，因为它也没有 sRGB 配置文件。

CalMAN 灰度校准（目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 灰度校准（目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度校准（目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度校准（目标色彩空间：P3）
已校准 CalMAN ColorChecker（目标色彩空间：P3）
已校准 CalMAN ColorChecker（目标色彩空间：P3）
对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 10.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.8 ms rise
↘ 18.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下
在阳光下
室外（阴天）
室外（阴天）

磨砂面板在户外表现出色，我们只希望在晴天时亮度能更高一些。IPS 面板的可视角度稳定性也不错。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - Meteor Lake 和 32GB 内存

 
 

处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H

红米笔记本 Pro 16 配备了全新的 酷睿至强 7 155H流星湖处理器。它有 16 个内核（22 个线程），性能内核的运行频率最高可达 4.8 GHz。我们测试设备的功率限制为 90/45 瓦，因此整体性能非常不错。性能 MateBook D16配备了 酷睿 i9-13900H在整体上略胜一筹，但这主要归功于其更好的单核性能。基本上，新款流星湖处理器的性能只是略逊于旧款猛禽湖处理器。

在持续负载情况下，多核性能下降约 15%。在电池工作状态下，处理器允许消耗 85/35 瓦，这也是多核性能降低约 13% 的原因。您可以在 技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1949 (1809.79-2490.19)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2016 (1825.4-2515.57)
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2289 (2208.24-2361.97)
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1628 (1515.15-1985.51)
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2242 (2190.82-2500.94)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
79.4 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
79.3 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
75.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
74.4 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
74.1 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
73.7 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
71.7 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
68.3 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17401 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years)
15626 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
15591 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15171 Points -13%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15013 (14365.6min - 15012.9max) Points -14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9769 - 19007, n=48)
14932 Points -14%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
13984 Points -20%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
12032 (9372.55min - 12032.4max) Points -31%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
1963 Points +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
1772 Points +1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years)
1767 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1759 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points 0%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1496 - 1815, n=48)
1725 Points -2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1719 Points -2%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6671 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5865 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
5857 Points -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3798 - 7409, n=46)
5794 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11924, n=87, last 2 years)
5746 Points -14%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5741 Points -14%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
5435 Points -19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
4740 Points -29%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
759 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
670 Points 0%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
669 Points 0%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
668 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
667 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (601 - 696, n=46)
664 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years)
650 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
629 Points -6%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2745 (2259.12min - 2745.18max) Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2516 (1825.4min - 2515.57max) Points -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
2501 (2190.82min - 2500.94max) Points -9%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
2490 (1809.79min - 2490.19max) Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 5224, n=94, last 2 years)
2469 Points -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1932 - 2880, n=52)
2446 Points -11%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2362 (2208.24min - 2361.97max) Points -14%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1986 (1515.15min - 1985.51max) Points -28%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
286 Points +12%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
268 Points +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years)
258 Points +1%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
257 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
254 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (99.6 - 268, n=48)
249 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
236 Points -8%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
266 Seconds * -40%
Average of class Multimedia
  (100 - 502, n=85, last 2 years)
252 Seconds * -33%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
239 Seconds * -26%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (175 - 381, n=44)
233 Seconds * -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
224 Seconds * -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
214 Seconds * -13%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
214 Seconds * -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
190 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68254 MIPS
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
64527 MIPS -5%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
63244 MIPS -7%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
61847 MIPS -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
61091 MIPS -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 130368, n=79, last 2 years)
60972 MIPS -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (41739 - 70254, n=46)
59045 MIPS -13%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
54022 MIPS -21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
6328 MIPS +15%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
6041 MIPS +10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5726 MIPS +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5496 MIPS 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5486 MIPS
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
5460 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4795 - 5621, n=46)
5345 MIPS -3%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5291 MIPS -4%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (7592 - 25760, n=68, last 2 years)
13849 Points +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13501 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
13225 Points -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12727 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
12611 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12422 Points -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (7732 - 13656, n=51)
12280 Points -9%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
10763 Points -20%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
2807 Points +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1534 - 3927, n=64, last 2 years)
2721 Points +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
2716 Points +13%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2562 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2440 Points +1%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2418 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2414 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1901 - 2473, n=48)
2376 Points -2%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13276 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
12604 Points -5%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12499 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)
12203 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12158 Points -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (10017 - 13556, n=48)
12022 Points -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
11817 Points -11%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
9516 Points -28%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
2020 Points +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
1949 Points +8%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1933 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2555, n=86, last 2 years)
1831 Points +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1801 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1764 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1462 - 1824, n=48)
1752 Points -3%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -3%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.5 fps
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
17.4 fps -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
17.1 fps -12%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.9 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.8 fps -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 34.3, n=78, last 2 years)
16.6 fps -15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9.93 - 21.2, n=46)
16.4 fps -16%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15.4 fps -21%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years)
49.2 s * -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (37.5 - 79.2, n=45)
48.8 s * -7%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.9 s * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
45.7 s *
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
43.4 s * +5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
40.9 s * +11%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
38.6 s * +16%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
36.1 s * +21%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.504 sec * -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.4845 sec * -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (0.4457 - 0.53, n=45)
0.4825 sec * -3%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4723 sec * -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4692 sec *
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4688 sec * -0%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4593 sec * +2%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4276 sec * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2745 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
144.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
256 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
667 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6671 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17401 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1759 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
107 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
895 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
89.2 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
87.5 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
87.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
84.8 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
84.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
81.9 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
81.5 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
81 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
17924 KRay/s +26%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
15218 KRay/s +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 50388, n=76, last 2 years)
14848 KRay/s +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14829 KRay/s +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
14272 KRay/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
13431 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6670 - 18470, n=46)
13107 KRay/s -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
12685 KRay/s -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
78381 Points +2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
78360 Points +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
77094 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 201874, n=77, last 2 years)
74206 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
73606 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40905 - 93181, n=46)
69549 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
68747 Points -11%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65478 Points -15%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3616 MB/s +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3545 MB/s
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
3519 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 8623, n=77, last 2 years)
3449 MB/s -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3391 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3320 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1940 - 4436, n=46)
3249 MB/s -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3022 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
108292 Points +23%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
103776 Points +18%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
96417 Points +9%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
93266 Points +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 181505, n=77, last 2 years)
91462 Points +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
88106 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
83844 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64698 - 94181, n=46)
83603 Points -5%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
12063 Points +20%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10170 Points +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10012 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 28794, n=77, last 2 years)
9567 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
9521 Points -5%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
9324 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (5639 - 10647, n=46)
9130 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8738 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
40720 Points +9%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
38412 Points +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
37438 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 105740, n=76, last 2 years)
37006 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
35833 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
34153 Points -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (18236 - 47685, n=46)
33785 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
31662 Points -15%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
113879 MB/s +58%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (45713 - 152179, n=46)
78103 MB/s +8%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
76481 MB/s +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)
75833 MB/s +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
72068 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
68954 MB/s -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
68004 MB/s -6%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
54432 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1058 MB/s +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1041 MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
995 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
966 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (557 - 1250, n=46)
962 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 2022, n=77, last 2 years)
947 MB/s -9%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
872 MB/s -16%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
822 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
9347 KRay/s +23%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8102 KRay/s +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 26875, n=77, last 2 years)
8055 KRay/s +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7952 KRay/s +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
7584 KRay/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
6970 KRay/s -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6921 KRay/s -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3569 - 9802, n=46)
6853 KRay/s -10%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
52218 MPixel/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
51338 MPixel/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (32719 - 54223, n=46)
46590 MPixel/s -11%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
46208 MPixel/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)
40715 MPixel/s -22%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40251 MPixel/s -23%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
36585 MPixel/s -30%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
31055 MPixel/s -41%

系统性能

我们的测试设备在合成系统基准测试中表现出色，我们的主观性能印象也非常高。在测试过程中，我们没有发现任何问题。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7033 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
6994 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
6952 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6815 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5159 - 7529, n=32)
6732 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
6713 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
6472 Points -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
6190 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
11664 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
11193 Points +2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11156 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
11079 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
10964 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
10816 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8580 - 11289, n=32)
10563 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10509 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
10099 Points +19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8959 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (7822 - 10591, n=32)
8749 Points +3%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8705 Points +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
8470 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
8343 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
7979 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7594 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
9999 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9720 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9265 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (4985 - 10709, n=32)
9011 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
8885 Points -11%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
8347 Points -17%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
7905 Points -21%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7573 Points -24%
CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2090 Points +18%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1811 Points +2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1804 Points +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1771 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1769 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1751 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years)
1717 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1366 - 1903, n=32)
1655 Points -7%
CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2030 Points +19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1798 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1722 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1704 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1693 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1685 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2042, n=90, last 2 years)
1626 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1291 - 1798, n=31)
1581 Points -7%
CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2151 Points +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2041 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years)
1934 Points +1%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1928 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1916 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1911 Points 0%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1821 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1519 - 1929, n=31)
1817 Points -5%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2094 Points +33%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1775 Points +13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1572 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1556 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1514 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1474 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2094, n=90, last 2 years)
1436 Points -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (939 - 1802, n=31)
1396 Points -11%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
321 Points +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (136.4 - 545, n=86, last 2 years)
320 Points +15%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
315 Points +13%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
306 Points +10%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
299 Points +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
279 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (252 - 299, n=32)
276 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
275 Points -1%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
348 Points +38%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
263 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (133.2 - 353, n=78, last 2 years)
262 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
257 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (234 - 309, n=27)
254 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
252 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
250 Points -1%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (517 - 614, n=33)
541 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
528 ms * -0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
528 ms *
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
525 ms * +1%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
522 ms * +1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (254 - 1016, n=90, last 2 years)
503 ms * +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
498 ms * +6%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
456 ms * +14%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
6994 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
93443 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
91209 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 96791, n=46)
83126 MB/s -11%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80951 MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)
68909 MB/s -26%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
68255 MB/s -27%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62899 MB/s -33%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
57062 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
90142 MB/s +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
85824 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (60544 - 90647, n=46)
80035 MB/s -7%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75886 MB/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)
70133 MB/s -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58557 MB/s -32%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
55510 MB/s -35%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
50373 MB/s -41%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91257 MB/s +32%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75909 MB/s +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75823 MB/s +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (58692 - 93451, n=46)
72600 MB/s +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)
70164 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
69292 MB/s 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69181 MB/s
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58061 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (116.2 - 233, n=46)
143.6 ns * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
139.9 ns *
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
135.9 ns * +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
125.8 ns * +10%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
115.9 ns * +17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)
106.9 ns * +24%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
102.3 ns * +27%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
88.9 ns * +36%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、播放 4K YouTube 视频、CPU 负载）中，我们的测试设备在使用当前 BIOS 版本的实时音频应用程序时没有受到任何限制。尽管有一个驱动程序显示出一些轻微的延迟，但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值仍然很低。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1736.9 μs * -189%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
998 μs * -66%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
622.4 μs * -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
600.7 μs *
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
580.3 μs * +3%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
527.2 μs * +12%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

小米为我们的测试机配备了一块来自中国制造商 YMTC 的短 M.2-2242 固态硬盘。PC300 的存储容量为 1 TB，固态硬盘在交付状态下进行了分区。首次启动后，用户在系统盘上仍有 137 GB 的可用空间（D 盘为 757 GB）。虽然这是 PCIe 4.0 硬盘，但传输速率更接近 PCIe 3.0 水平。但这在日常操作中并不会造成什么问题，即使在持续负载的情况下，性能也能保持完全稳定。此外，还有一个额外的 M.2-2242 插槽可用于存储扩展。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
YMTC PC300-1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3848 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2978 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 654 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 360 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 70.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 201 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1429 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1524 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
85.1 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
84.6 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
75.6 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
57.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
56.9 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
54.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
50.1 pt
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
 
47.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4432 (4393.32min - 4432.27max) MB/s +97%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4315 (4249.57min - 4315.1max) MB/s +91%
Average of class Multimedia
  (888 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)
2958 MB/s +31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2652 (2626.88min - 2652.48max) MB/s +18%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (2254 - 2909, n=3)
2554 MB/s +13%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2550 (2480.3min - 2550.14max) MB/s +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2534 (2495.65min - 2534.16max) MB/s +12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2254 (2201.38min - 2254.23max) MB/s
seq write
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4432 (4395.44min - 4431.7max) MB/s +90%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3877 (3852.68min - 3877.42max) MB/s +66%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)
3086 MB/s +32%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3024 (2941.45min - 3024.09max) MB/s +30%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2330 (2272.26min - 2329.73max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2328 (2307.7min - 2328.26max) MB/s 0%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (1112 - 2330, n=3)
1884 MB/s -19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1505 (1276.71min - 1504.84max) MB/s -35%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7107 (6650.61min - 7107.46max) MB/s +91%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
6418 (5867.84min - 6417.66max) MB/s +72%
Average of class Multimedia
  (944 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)
5413 MB/s +45%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4921 (3974.96min - 4921.18max) MB/s +32%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
4899 (4572.84min - 4898.89max) MB/s +31%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (3727 - 3911, n=3)
3832 MB/s +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
3727 (3040.66min - 3726.94max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
3562 (3054.5min - 3562.01max) MB/s -4%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5249 (5168.16min - 5248.53max) MB/s +118%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4927 (1087.79min - 4927.05max) MB/s +105%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)
4155 MB/s +72%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3880 (3869.46min - 3880.36max) MB/s +61%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3326 (3267.12min - 3325.66max) MB/s +38%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (2409 - 3004, n=3)
2761 MB/s +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2409 (2377.61min - 2408.59max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2344 (1404.04min - 2343.99max) MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
81.5 (81.19min - 81.46max) MB/s +49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
80.8 (80.01min - 80.76max) MB/s +47%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
77.3 (74.57min - 77.3max) MB/s +41%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)
63.3 MB/s +16%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
61.4 (58.57min - 61.39max) MB/s +12%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
60.7 (60.49min - 60.66max) MB/s +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
54.8 (51.93min - 54.84max) MB/s
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (42.6 - 62.2, n=3)
53.2 MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
378 (372.97min - 377.71max) MB/s +96%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
279 (266.75min - 279.17max) MB/s +45%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
202 (200.14min - 201.86max) MB/s +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
193 (186.4min - 192.95max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
190.9 (186.79min - 190.93max) MB/s -1%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (112.5 - 240, n=3)
181.8 MB/s -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)
169.8 MB/s -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
167.2 (164.63min - 167.17max) MB/s -13%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3839 (3251.93min - 3838.52max) MB/s +128%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2928 (2922.85min - 2927.86max) MB/s +74%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2923 (2892.49min - 2922.92max) MB/s +74%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1821 (1804.4min - 1821.4max) MB/s +8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1684 (1639.23min - 1684.06max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)
1380 MB/s -18%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (850 - 1684, n=3)
1179 MB/s -30%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
663 (616.18min - 663.42max) MB/s -61%
4k q32 t16 write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3115 (3077.16min - 3114.78max) MB/s +173%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3063 (2744.16min - 3062.6max) MB/s +168%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1643 (1597.74min - 1643.45max) MB/s +44%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1380 (1115.15min - 1380.3max) MB/s +21%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1142 (1093.19min - 1142.3max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)
1020 MB/s -11%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (375 - 1142, n=3)
835 MB/s -27%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
491 (479.11min - 490.6max) MB/s -57%
AS SSD
Score Total
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
7876 Points +80%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7524 Points +72%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
7463 Points +71%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)
5024 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
4643 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4549 Points +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
4369 Points
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (3819 - 4369, n=3)
4146 Points -5%
Score Read
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2901 Points +92%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2885 Points +91%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2677 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1795 Points +19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)
1619 Points +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1511 Points
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (1195 - 1526, n=3)
1411 Points -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1314 Points -13%
Score Write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3532 Points +68%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3528 Points +67%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
3132 Points +49%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2650 Points +26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)
2638 Points +25%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2107 Points
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (1967 - 2107, n=3)
2048 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1962 Points -7%
Seq Read
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
5796.32 MB/s +78%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5528.24 MB/s +70%
Average of class Multimedia
  (837 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)
4213 MB/s +30%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
4105 MB/s +26%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3992.32 MB/s +23%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (3245 - 3304, n=3)
3267 MB/s 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
3252 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
3189 MB/s -2%
Seq Write
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4720.45 MB/s +74%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4449.45 MB/s +64%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3445 MB/s +27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)
2759 MB/s +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2714 MB/s
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (1828 - 2714, n=3)
2388 MB/s -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2260 MB/s -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1951.27 MB/s -28%
4K Read
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
97.4 MB/s +108%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
69.8 MB/s +49%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
69.33 MB/s +48%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
66.45 MB/s +42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 97.4, n=73, last 2 years)
61.5 MB/s +31%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
59.9 MB/s +28%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (46.9 - 58.5, n=3)
51.2 MB/s +9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
46.9 MB/s
4K Write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
328 MB/s +80%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
230.09 MB/s +26%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
221.3 MB/s +21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)
188.4 MB/s +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
182.5 MB/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
178.71 MB/s -2%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (158.6 - 182.5, n=3)
169.7 MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
168.8 MB/s -8%
4K-64 Read
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2377 MB/s +109%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2255.03 MB/s +98%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2054.46 MB/s +81%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1407 MB/s +24%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1138 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)
1136 MB/s 0%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (806 - 1153, n=3)
1032 MB/s -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
855.29 MB/s -25%
4K-64 Write
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2904.81 MB/s +76%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2859 MB/s +73%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2430.22 MB/s +47%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2233.12 MB/s +35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)
2173 MB/s +31%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1653 MB/s
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (1546 - 1719, n=3)
1639 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1567 MB/s -5%
Access Time Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)
0.05459 ms * -148%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
0.053 ms * -141%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.047 ms * -114%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.037 ms * -68%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
0.033 ms * -50%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
0.029 ms * -32%
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (0.022 - 0.027, n=3)
0.02433 ms * -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
0.022 ms *
Access Time Write
Average YMTC PC300-1TB
  (0.101 - 0.11, n=3)
0.1043 ms * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
0.101 ms *
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.068 ms * +33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)
0.06053 ms * +40%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
0.053 ms * +48%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
0.032 ms * +68%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
0.031 ms * +69%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.017 ms * +83%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01653304956608259901155132014851650181519802145231024752640280529703135Tooltip
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3215 (2929.72-3237.37)

图形卡

GPU-Z 英特尔弧形图形处理器
GPU-Z 英特尔弧形图形处理器

新的流星湖处理器还包括新的 Arc 图形处理器.与 Core Ultra 7 155HiGPU 当然也受益于快速工作内存（LPDDR5x-7467）。红米本 Pro 16 的性能非常出色，是我们迄今测试过的最快的 Arc iGPU 之一。在基准测试中，我们完全没有发现掉帧的问题，而一些竞争对手（尤其是功耗更低的 Meteor Lake CPU）仍然存在这种情况。

在合成测试中，AMD AMD Radeon 780M可以超越，但在实际游戏基准测试中，780M 的快速版本仍有一些优势。但我们认为，这种情况仍会随着未来的更新而有所改善。许多老游戏都可以在高分辨率下以 1080p 舒适地运行，甚至目前的一些游戏，如《赛博朋克 2077》，也可以在低分辨率下相当流畅地运行。如果可能，您应该使用升频来进一步提高性能。例如，在 1080p 的低细节条件下，使用激活的 XeSS 可以将性能从 34.7 FPS 提高到 42 FPS。

在持续负载和电池运行的情况下，图形性能保持完全稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
62 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
59.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
58.2 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
55.4 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
48.7 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
34.2 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
34.1 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years)
20955 Points +57%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13381 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12520 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12099 Points -10%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8064 - 13716, n=35)
11984 Points -10%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11636 Points -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
7389 Points -45%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
7389 Points -45%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years)
15047 Points +56%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9650 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8886 Points -8%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8796 Points -9%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5568 - 9692, n=39)
8302 Points -14%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7156 Points -26%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
5988 Points -38%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
5982 Points -38%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years)
5695 Points +56%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3656 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3511 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3426 Points -6%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (2018 - 3770, n=42)
3231 Points -12%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2363 Points -35%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1782 Points -51%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1782 Points -51%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (10769 - 132836, n=86, last 2 years)
61732 Points +91%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32496 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32336 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
31117 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
30876 Points -5%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (17193 - 37639, n=41)
30130 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
20674 Points -36%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
20293 Points -37%
Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
Average of class Multimedia
  (9994 - 120835, n=62, last 2 years)
54846 Points +53%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35855 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35606 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35154 Points -2%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (17911 - 39941, n=41)
32332 Points -10%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
26557 Points -26%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
17221 Points -52%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
17018 Points -53%
3DMark 11 Performance
13729 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9001 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4042 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
460 Seconds * -34%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (294 - 692, n=38)
430 Seconds * -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (160 - 946, n=87, last 2 years)
422 Seconds * -23%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
421 Seconds * -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
412 Seconds * -20%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
380 Seconds * -10%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
374 Seconds * -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
344 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
55 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
53.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
48.2 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
44.5 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
42.9 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39.8 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=79, last 2 years)
55.1 fps +120%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.2 (22min) fps 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.1 (23min, 24P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
23.1 (12min, 21P1) fps -8%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
20.4 (18min) fps -19%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.8 (16min, 16P1) fps -33%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
15.5 (14min, 14P1) fps -38%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 141.6, n=82, last 2 years)
55.1 fps +247%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21 (3.16min, 14.5P1) fps +32%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
15.9 (2.93min, 11.4P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
14.3 (1.247min, 7.75P1) fps -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.8 (4.99min, 6.13P1) fps -32%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.6 (3.8min) fps -33%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years)
53.2 fps +74%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
30.6 fps
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
27 fps -12%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.6 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.4 fps -20%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21.2 fps -31%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
19.1 fps -38%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=81, last 2 years)
92.1 fps +74%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
53 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
47 fps -11%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46.1 (5min, 20.8P1) fps -13%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
41.3 (7.5min, 9.37P1) fps -22%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.5 (5.9min, 8.29P1) fps -46%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.3 (5.5min, 8.1P1) fps -47%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=83, last 2 years)
97.6 fps +22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
79.8 (51.5min) fps
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
75.6 (49.1min) fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
73.6 (51.1min) fps -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
65.6 (56.3min) fps -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
65 (54.9min) fps -19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
61.4 (52min) fps -23%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)
68.2 fps +110%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39.8 fps +23%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39.5 fps +22%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
37.8 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
33.5 fps +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
32.4 fps
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
30.3 fps -6%

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0510152025Tooltip
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø25.1 (23-28)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 171.5 164.4 41.2 15.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 157 97 57 25.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 102.4 96.9 83 79.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 84.1 45 30.6 23
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 56.1 40.1 32.4
Far Cry 5 (2018) 84 52 48 45 32
Strange Brigade (2018) 205 84 64 53 42
F1 23 (2023) 80.1 74.2 50.4 14
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 34.7 29.5 25 21.2

排放 - 风扇噪音低，冷却效果好

噪音水平

双风扇冷却
双风扇冷却

小米采用了强大的散热系统，包括两个风扇和两个热管。在日常运行中，风扇经常保持关闭状态或非常安静地运行。此外，风扇曲线调整得很好，尽管处理器的功率限制很高，但一些短时间的负载峰值并不会立即导致风扇转速上升。即使在负载情况下，设备总体上仍然非常安静，尤其是在游戏（根据 CPU 负载情况约为 31-35 dB(A)）或纯 CPU 负载情况下。只有在 CPU/GPU 合并负载的压力测试中，由于处理器的功耗高达 115 瓦，风扇的声音才会短暂变大，最高达到 39.7 分贝（A）。但当功耗再次降低时，风扇噪音也会下降到 38 分贝（A）左右。基本上，在完成负载阶段后，风扇也会迅速停止工作。我们的测试设备中没有其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
24.4 / 24.4 / 24.4 dB(A)
Load
32 / 39.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.742.237.837.335.437.340.22528.733.927.225.528.627.626.4313632.628.330.729.630.728.14034.835.837.434.134.434.436.65028.330.531.326.531.130.832.46326.827.824.325.125.824.926.88024.225.823.122.926.725.6241002727.224.224.825.425.221.312526.427.322.920.323.120.121.116024.925.122.418.322.82020.120026.827.123.318.42219.820.825025.126.522.519.12217.921.431524.626.620.416.82115.219.440025.227.321.616.4211419.650026.227.620.914.220.81119.663027.428.52214.821.311.421.180027.929.4211722.310.922100027.128.320.11521.710.521.3125027.328.518.714.221.310.321.316002929.81914.922.21121.7200028.729.819.215.120.91120.725002728.617.914.119.411.418.9315027.228.917.114.119.411.918.7400026.62816.113.118.712.418.6500022.223.81513.516.112.715.3630020.121.315.214.415.712.814.1800018.419.614.614.215.412.813.21000015.516.714.113.51412.812.81250014.114.814.614.314.712.812.7160001413.614.113.914.312.112.2SPL38.439.730.626.83224.431.5N2.93.31.40.91.60.61.5median 26.4median 27.3median 19.2median 14.8median 21median 12.7median 19.6Delta3.23.53.41.92.233.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB		Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU		MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB		Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N		Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
Noise
5%
-10%
-16%
-11%
-13%
off / environment *
24.4
23.2
5%
24.6
-1%
24.5
-0%
23.4
4%
25.3
-4%
Idle Minimum *
24.4
23.2
5%
24.6
-1%
24.5
-0%
24.1
1%
25.3
-4%
Idle Average *
24.4
23.2
5%
24.6
-1%
26.3
-8%
24.3
-0%
25.3
-4%
Idle Maximum *
24.4
24
2%
26.4
-8%
26.3
-8%
28
-15%
25.3
-4%
Load Average *
32
28
12%
40
-25%
36.5
-14%
41
-28%
43.5
-36%
Witcher 3 ultra *
30.6
31.9
-4%
40
-31%
46.3
-51%
40.9
-34%
Load Maximum *
39.7
36.2
9%
40
-1%
52.9
-33%
40.9
-3%
50.75
-28%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在空闲运行和低负载情况下，金属外壳仍然非常凉爽，即使在负载情况下也没有问题。虽然底部有一个热点，温度高达 46 °C（115 °F），但这是在背面的中央区域，因此即使这样，你仍然可以把设备放在大腿上。键盘区域的温度保持在 40 °C（104 °F）以下，尤其是掌托，即使在高负载情况下也几乎不会发热。

如前所述，酷睿至尊 7 155H 在 CPU/GPU 综合负载下的功耗最高可达 115 瓦，但几分钟后功耗会降至 45 瓦。

压力测试期间的 CPU/iGPU 值
压力测试期间的 CPU/iGPU 值
Max. Load
 39.7 °C40.3 °C37.5 °C 
 38.1 °C39.9 °C30.1 °C 
 26.8 °C25.9 °C26.1 °C 
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 33.8 °C
39.1 °C45.9 °C40.4 °C
29.3 °C43 °C41.6 °C
26.2 °C27.8 °C26.8 °C
Maximum: 45.9 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47.7 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.1 °C / 80.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.7 °C / 3 F).
应力测试期间的表面温度（顶部）
应力测试期间的表面温度（顶部）
应力测试期间的表面温度（底部）
应力测试期间的表面温度（底部）
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU		Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU		MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU		Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M		Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
1%
6%
-1%
-8%
-39%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.3
40.3
-0%
40.9
-1%
48.8
-21%
41.6
-3%
51.5
-28%
Maximum Bottom *
45.9
45.1
2%
42.6
7%
47.6
-4%
46.6
-2%
62.4
-36%
Idle Upper Side *
26.3
26.6
-1%
24.5
7%
24.2
8%
30.4
-16%
41.7
-59%
Idle Bottom *
27.9
27.1
3%
24.8
11%
23.6
15%
31
-11%
37.2
-33%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

红米笔记本 Pro 16 的立体声扬声器给人留下了良好的印象。尽管也有音效更好的多媒体笔记本电脑，但它们的价格也要贵得多。但我们的测试机依然毫不逊色，其音效与三星 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro为例（价格是后者的两倍）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.740.42528.937.13130.933.44038.533.45029.233.56327.933.88023.237.610024.142.812519.147.21601949.820018.354.725018.559.53151663.44001566.150011.366.563010.771.380010.378100010.176.412509.973.4160010.671.1200010.970.7250011.665.6315011.665.3400011.967.6500012.167.6630012.474.8800012.570.71000012.469.61250012.466.11600011.657.4SPL24.283.8N0.660.2median 12.1median 66.5Delta2.35.34542.14446.433.735.533.634.432.638.628.129.424.529.123.938.321.749.319.353.621.459.322.462.317.366.714.7681367.312.270.711.177.610.873.710.473.310.671.610.974.211.173.211.869.111.866.411.961.112.364.412.364.112.56812.468.711.856.724.683.40.657.7median 12.3median 67.32.95.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 超长电池寿命

耗电量

我们对功耗的测量没有出现意外，空闲运行时的最大功耗为 12 瓦，考虑到良好的亮度值，我们的测试设备相当高效。在压力测试开始时，最大功耗为 140.6 瓦，之后在 102 瓦左右趋于平稳，在继续测试时为 78 瓦。值得肯定的是，小米没有在充电器上偷工减料，使用了 140 瓦的适配器，因此即使在压力测试期间也无需使用电池。此外，这是一款现代的 GaN 充电器，体积也非常小巧。充电器本身采用美国插头，但也随附了一个欧盟适配器。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.56 / 0.64 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.2 / 11.6 / 12.3 Watt
Load midlight 61.9 / 140.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"		Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"		MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"		Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"		Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
15%
34%
10%
2%
-9%
10%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
4.2
4.7
-12%
3.6
14%
3
29%
7.1
-69%
5.73
-36%
5.41 ?(1.8 - 10.3, n=37)
-29%
6.84 ?(2.1 - 31.3, n=87, last 2 years)
-63%
Idle Average *
11.6
9.5
18%
5.7
51%
9.5
18%
10.1
13%
14.5
-25%
8.64 ?(4.2 - 16, n=37)
26%
11.6 ?(4.6 - 38.3, n=87, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
12.3
10.1
18%
6.1
50%
12
2%
18.6
-51%
15.6
-27%
12.1 ?(4.5 - 49, n=37)
2%
13.7 ?(5.6 - 41.6, n=87, last 2 years)
-11%
Load Average *
61.9
49.7
20%
52.5
15%
68.3
-10%
45.3
27%
40.5
35%
54.2 ?(31.3 - 76.2, n=36)
12%
71.9 ?(15.1 - 147, n=85, last 2 years)
-16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
57
60
-5%
46.6
18%
59.8
-5%
39.5
31%
74.9
-31%
Load Maximum *
140.6
66.3
53%
64.7
54%
104.8
25%
52.9
62%
94
33%
85 ?(60 - 144.9, n=37)
40%
118.5 ?(47.7 - 270, n=87, last 2 years)
16%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø57 (55.6-58.8)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø99.3 (82.3-140.6)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.51 (3.91-15.7)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø82.6 (64.3-131.8)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø107.5 (97.8-117)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø28 (20.8-47)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø95.3 (89.8-114.6)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø60.6 (57.9-64.8)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.4 (47.1-52.7)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.74 (0.0236-9.54)

电池寿命

电池信息
电池信息

红米笔记本 Pro 16 的电池容量为 99 瓦时，续航时间极长。在 WLAN 测试中，只有 微星威望 16(在 WLAN 测试中仅被微星 Prestige 16 超越（但它的显示屏分辨率也较低）。使用 150 cd/m²（相当于测试机最大亮度的 60%）和 60 Hz 的亮度，我们的测试机在 WLAN 测试中实现了 16:23 小时（165 Hz 时为 13:46 小时）的超长运行时间。在全亮度条件下，面板的耗电量增加，电池寿命在 60 Hz 时减少到 9:39 小时（165 Hz 时为 9 小时），这仍然是一个非常好的结果。视频测试再次显示了全新 Meteor Lake 处理器的优势，在 150 cd/m² 的条件下，视频可播放近 22 小时。在负载最差的情况下（最大亮度），2 小时多一点就会熄灭。在设备开启的情况下，完整的充电过程需要 89 分钟，43 分钟后即可获得 80% 的电量。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 23min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
9h 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 48min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 04min
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh		Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 76 Wh		MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh		Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh		Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh		Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-33%
-22%
23%
-66%
-13%
-31%
H.264
1308
835
-36%
1144
-13%
537
-59%
847 ?(319 - 1481, n=53, last 2 years)
-35%
WiFi v1.3
983
674
-31%
644
-34%
1100
12%
336
-66%
510
-48%
636 ?(262 - 1204, n=87, last 2 years)
-35%
Load
124
83
-33%
100
-19%
166
34%
209
69%
96.4 ?(39 - 212, n=64, last 2 years)
-22%

Pros

+ 坚固的金属外壳
+ 良好的连接设备，包括 Thunderbolt 4
+ 出色的键盘
+ 出色的 165 Hz IPS 显示屏
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 超长电池寿命
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 2 个 M.2-2242 插槽

Cons

- 焊接 RAM
- 无线局域网传输速率慢
- 无 sRGB 配置文件
- 仅适用于 US 键盘布局

评语：红米本 Pro 16 是一款出色的多媒体笔记本电脑

测试小米红米本 Pro 16。测试机由 TradingShenzen 提供。
测试小米红米本 Pro 16。测试机由 TradingShenzen 提供。

新款小米红米笔记本 Pro 16 在我们的测试中给人留下了非常好的印象（不仅是相对于其价格而言），这款多媒体笔记本电脑甚至完全不需要躲避更昂贵的设备。坚固耐用的高品质铝制外壳、没有任何偷工减料的连接设备、按键行程长且按压点准确的键盘也非常舒适。哑光 IPS 面板也给人留下了深刻印象，主观画质好、亮度高，165 Hz 的频率也能带来流畅的显示效果。但它仍需经过校准才能达到最佳性能，遗憾的是没有 sRGB 配置文件。99 瓦时电池的续航时间非常出色。

性能方面的好消息还在继续，因为这是迄今为止我们测试过的最好的 Meteor Lake 实现之一。功率限制非常高，仅为 90 瓦，但这当然会带来很高的性能。尽管如此，在负载峰值时，散热也不会立即启动。全新 Arc iGPU 的图形性能也非常出色，并得益于快速工作内存。

高品质的机箱、舒适的键盘、快速的处理器、32 GB 内存、超长的电池续航时间以及非常出色的 IPS 显示屏：如果你不需要专用显卡，小米红米笔记本 Pro 16 是最好的多媒体笔记本之一。不到 1,000 欧元（约合 1,066 美元）的价格，整套配置几乎无可匹敌。

就缺点而言，有几个方面，但并不严重。WLAN 性能出乎意料地低，这可能会导致 1 GB/s 的高速互联网连接受到一些小限制。此外，网络摄像头的质量可以稍好一些，ClickPad 的咔哒声也有点大。不过，这些都是非常高级别的抱怨。工作内存是焊接的，但有了 32 GB 内存，这应该不是太大的限制。当然，对于德国用户来说，美式键盘布局可能也是一个问题，但你可以习惯它，或者在特殊按键上贴一些贴纸来补救。

与竞争对手相比，红米笔记本 Pro 16 在大多数方面都做得更好，而且考虑到不到 1,000 欧元（约合 1,066 美元）的价格，其整体配置几乎无可匹敌。目前，我们还在测试联想 IdeaPad Pro 16，它也配备了 酷睿至尊 7 155H.但它的价格更高，尤其是在图像质量方面，IdeaPad 无法与红米笔记本 Pro 16 相提并论。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

例如，您可以从TradingShenzen 购买红米本 Pro 16，价格约为 1059 美元（包括英文版 Windows Pro）。

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 - 04/21/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
91%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
57 / 80 → 72%
Weight
65 / 20-72 → 86%
Battery
92 / 95 → 96%
Display
92%
Games Performance
81 / 90 → 90%
Application Performance
92 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
96 / 95 → 100%
Audio
84%
Camera
37 / 85 → 43%
Average
81%
90%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 (RedmiBook Pro 16 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米红米本 Pro 16 2024 评测--也许是电池续航时间最长的流星湖笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-04-22 (Update: 2024-04-22)