华硕 NUC 14 Pro 评测：配备 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H、快速 Intel Arc iGPU 和 2x Thunderbolt 4 的 NUC 迷你 PC

Name: Asus NUC 14 Pro
Brand: Asus

不是视觉亮点！

华硕接管了英特尔的 NUC 部门，现在提供配备英特尔流星湖处理器的流行迷你 PC。这不仅为小型台式电脑提供了更强大的 CPU 能力，而且由于改进了 iGPU，还能显著提高 3D 性能。我们对搭载英特尔酷睿 5125H 处理器的华硕 NUC 14 Pro 进行了详细测试，并根据大量测量和基准测试对其性能进行了评估。
Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 08/30/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Mini PC Desktop Intel 3D Printing Meteor Lake Thunderbolt

曾经由英特尔推出的 NUC 系列（Next Unit of Computing）已由华硕接手。华硕现在推出的是我们熟悉的同款机型，但同时也推出了更新的设备。基于英特尔流星湖技术，这些紧凑型计算设备获得了更强大的动力，最重要的是，它们还受益于采用 Arc 架构的改进型 iGPU。华硕 NUC 14 Pro 有不同的处理器可供选择，与往常一样，它有一个扁平且稍厚的版本，为 2.5 英寸硬盘提供了额外的空间。我们测试了华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的薄型版本，其处理器为英特尔酷睿 5 125H.该设备是裸机，这意味着我们必须在测试前安装内存和固态硬盘。操作系统也不包括在供货范围内。对于我们的测试样品来说，你必须在桌子上放上 500 多欧元。与竞争对手相比，如果考虑到裸机选项所带来的额外成本，这个价格就显得很高了。与其他品牌相比，华硕的知名度更高，提供的支持也更好。

下表列出了华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的竞争对手。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus NUC 14 Pro

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 14 x 3.6 - 4.5 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 64 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Core: 2200 MHz, 32.0.101.5762 DCH

Mainboard

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH

Storage

Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G, 2048 GB

, 1750 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock

Networking

Intel Ethernet Controller I226-V (10/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 37 x 117 x 112

Additional features

120W power adapter, VESA-Mount, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

525 g, Power Supply: 238 g

Price

500 EUR

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height
74.7 %	v8	08 / 2024	Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	525 g	37 mm
78 %	v8	07 / 2024	Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	578 g	49.2 mm
74.5 %	v8	07 / 2024	Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	797 g	49 mm
73.7 %	v8		Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M	525 g	60 mm
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	768 g	57 mm
81.2 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Geekom A5 R7 5800H, Vega 8	555 g	49.2 mm

注：我们已经更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。这里.

外壳 - 黑色塑料外壳覆盖金属外壳

从外观上看，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 让人联想到英特尔 NUC 12 Pro 套件虽然设计略有改动。不过，材料的选择是相同的。基本概念也没有改变，黑色塑料隐藏着坚固的金属框架。从触感上看，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 不如依靠铝制外壳的迷你 PC。在视觉效果上，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 也不尽如人意。不过，其做工无可挑剔。另一方面，底部经过了重新设计，包括一个机械锁，无需工具即可打开设备。我们在这里测试的超薄版设计非常扁平，高度为 37 毫米。11.7 x 11.2 厘米的占地面积几乎为正方形，在桌面上几乎不占空间。随附的 VESA 支架还可将其安装在显示器上。

尺寸比较

设备

华硕 NUC 14 Pro 迷你电脑虽然设计小巧，却提供了许多接口。总共有六个 USB 端口，其中四个是广泛使用的 Type-A 插座，另外两个是 Type-C 插座。后者还提供完整的 Thunderbolt 支持。这使华硕 NUC 14 Pro 有别于其他迷你电脑，后者通常只提供简单的 USB 4 端口或传统的 Type-C 端口。此外，还有两个 HDMI 端口和一个 2.5G 网络连接。

正面：1 个 USB 3.2 Gen2x2 Type-C，2 个 USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A

后面板：电源接口、2 个 Thunderbold（C 型）、1 个 USB 3.2、1 个 USB 2.0、LAN 2.5G、2 个 HDMI 2.1

交流

华硕为 NUC 14 Pro 配备了英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 模块，该模块在测试中表现出色。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器配合使用，我们记录到的结果始终优于对比设备。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1770 (1584^min - 1790^max) MBit/s +2%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1755 (1737^min - 1766^max) MBit/s +2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1729 (1594^min - 1755^max) MBit/s
Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1528 (1495^min - 1552^max) MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=213)	1493 MBit/s -14%
Average of class Mini PC (684 - 1771, n=55, last 2 years)	1380 MBit/s -20%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1699 (1590^min - 1792^max) MBit/s +23%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1615 (767^min - 1670^max) MBit/s +17%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1605 (1238^min - 1652^max) MBit/s +16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1379 (1299^min - 1425^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (385 - 1851, n=214)	1368 MBit/s -1%
Average of class Mini PC (394 - 1800, n=55, last 2 years)	1330 MBit/s -4%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=242)	1382 MBit/s 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1379 (1016^min - 1613^max) MBit/s
Geekom A5 Realtek RTL8852BE	946 (856^min - 970^max) MBit/s -31%
Average of class Mini PC (320 - 1796, n=113, last 2 years)	945 MBit/s -31%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	936 (907^min - 946^max) MBit/s -32%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	838 (728^min - 926^max) MBit/s -39%
Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	707 (631^min - 811^max) MBit/s -49%
Aoostar GEM10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	451 (228^min - 466^max) MBit/s -67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1331 (1187^min - 1442^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=242)	1231 MBit/s -8%
Average of class Mini PC (184.1 - 1776, n=113, last 2 years)	874 MBit/s -34%
Geekom A5 Realtek RTL8852BE	834 (730^min - 861^max) MBit/s -37%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	758 (727^min - 793^max) MBit/s -43%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	709 (369^min - 977^max) MBit/s -47%
Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	573 (145^min - 972^max) MBit/s -57%
Aoostar GEM10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	429 (325^min - 510^max) MBit/s -68%

Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1379 (1299-1425)

Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1700 (1590-1792)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1605 (1238-1652)

Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1590 (767-1670)

Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1728 (1594-1755)

Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1527 (1495-1552)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1755 (1737-1766)

Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1769 (1584-1790)

Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1379 (1016-1613)

Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø707 (631-811)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø935 (907-946)

Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø838 (728-926)

Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1331 (1187-1442)

Geekom AE7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø558 (145-972)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø758 (727-793)

Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø695 (369-977)

配件

华硕 NUC 14 Pro 随附一个 120 瓦的电源装置和一个带安装材料的 VESA 支架。制造商不提供任何其他配件，如键盘或鼠标。

维护

我们收到的华硕 NUC 14 Pro 是裸机版本，这意味着供货范围不包括内存、固态硬盘和操作系统。因此，用户必须能够轻松打开设备，自行安装缺少的组件。华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的底板无需工具即可轻松拆卸。制造商集成了一个小型机械闩锁，使之成为可能：内存和固态硬盘可以快速安装，然后迷你 PC 就可以首次启动了。该设备可安装两个固态硬盘，并为内存提供了两个 SO-DIMM 插槽。为达到最佳运行效果，两个 SO-DIMM 插槽都应占用。

可持续性

华硕 NUC 14 Pro 是一款非常小巧的微型电脑，与传统台式电脑相比，它在能耗方面具有显著优势。该设备装在一个小盒子里，体积并不过大。迷你电脑本身主要由金属和塑料制成。我们不知道在生产过程中是否使用了专门的回收材料。华硕的三年保修期受到好评。

性能

英特尔英特尔酷睿至强 5 125H是英特尔流星湖系列中一款稳健而强大的中端 SoC。该 SoC 拥有大量物理计算内核，最终确保了良好的多线程性能。此外，Meteor Lake SoC 还对 iGPU 进行了改进，与基于 Arc 架构的过时的前代英特尔 Iris Xe iGPU 相比，性能明显提升。华硕 NUC 14 Pro 还提供性能稍弱的英特尔酷睿 3 100U，以及性能稍强的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 SoC。

测试条件

我们使用 "平衡 "能源配置文件进行了所有性能测试。我们没有改变 SoC 的性能，而是根据 BIOS 设置（平衡）将其保持在默认状态。BIOS 设置非常广泛。与 Geekom、Minisforum 或 Acemagic 的微型电脑相比，华硕在这方面明显领先。除了 CPU 功耗，甚至还可以停用单个 USB 端口。

处理器

在我们的案例中，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 配备了英特尔酷睿 5 125H.14 个内核，共 18 个线程，确保了较高的工作速度，这使我们的测试样品位居第三。处理器的功耗上限为 64 瓦，短时间内多次达到。在较长的负载情况下，SoC 只会因温度过高而节流。在负载情况下，温度超过 100 °C的情况并不少见。华硕似乎没有进一步降低英特尔 SoC 的速度，因为根据规格书，SoC 的最高工作温度为 110 °C。与 Minisforum UH125 Pro的直接比较中，华硕的测试样品胜出。在单项测试中，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的单核性能略胜一筹。

有关进一步的比较和基准测试，请参阅我们的 CPU 对比表.

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	57 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	55.3 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	50.9 pt
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	50.4 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	50.1 pt
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	48.6 pt

Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1022 Points +25%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	946 Points +16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	815 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	814 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	709 Points -13%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	618 Points -24%
CPU Single Core
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	108 Points +6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	106 Points +4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	102 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	97 Points -5%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	88 Points -14%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	86 Points -16%

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18497 Points +27%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16099 Points +11%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	14564 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	14516 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	13117 Points -10%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	10819 Points -25%
Single Core
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1788 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1771 Points +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1721 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1640 Points -5%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1542 Points -10%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1405 Points -18%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	700 Points +13%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	679 Points +9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	629 Points +1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	622 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	598 Points -4%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	551 Points -11%
CPU (Multi Core)
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7188 Points +28%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6321 Points +13%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5618 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5617 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5216 Points -7%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4229 Points -25%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	281 Points +13%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points +4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	248 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	240 Points -3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	235 Points -5%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	227 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2738 Points +28%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2544 Points +19%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2245 Points +5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2141 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2117 Points -1%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1773 Points -17%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3.38 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.13 Points +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3.03 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2.86 Points -6%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2.86 Points -6%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2.69 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33.49 Points +24%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	30.49 Points +13%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	27.02 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	26.92 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	24.57 Points -9%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	21.25 Points -21%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	14232 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13938 Points +5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	13281 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	12858 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	12142 Points -9%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	11378 Points -14%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95005 Points +21%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	87296 Points +11%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	78817 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	78788 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	70792 Points -10%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	62312 Points -21%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	293 Seconds * -29%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	259 Seconds * -14%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	230 Seconds * -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	228 Seconds *
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	197 Seconds * +14%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	178 Seconds * +22%

wPrime 2.10
32m
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	4.48 s * -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	4.107 s *
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	3.93 s * +4%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	3.55 s * +14%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.523 s * +14%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2.699 s * +34%
1024m
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	246.982 s * -66%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	148.994 s *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	139.617 s * +6%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	111.714 s * +25%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	97.298 s * +35%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	96.95 s * +35%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	325 (323^min - 328^max) fps +5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	308.5 (306^min - 311^max) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	304.5 (304^min - 306^max) fps -1%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	288 (287^min - 289^max) fps -7%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	251.5 (250^min - 256^max) fps -18%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	244 (242^min - 246^max) fps -21%
Pass 2
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	154.15 (153.8^min - 154.3^max) fps +17%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	144.15 (143.5^min - 146.6^max) fps +9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	134 (133.7^min - 134.5^max) fps +1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	132.3 (129.2^min - 135^max) fps
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	122.2 (120.3^min - 126.1^max) fps -8%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	104.65 (104.1^min - 106.9^max) fps -21%

WinRAR - Result
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7723 KB/s +22%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7580 KB/s +20%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	7042 KB/s +12%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6315 KB/s
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5890 KB/s -7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5594 KB/s -11%

TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15.2 GB/s +73%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	13.5 GB/s +53%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	11.5 GB/s +31%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10.6 GB/s +20%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	9 GB/s +2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	8.8 GB/s
Twofish Mean 100MB
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2.1 GB/s +50%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1.8 GB/s +29%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1.7 GB/s +21%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1.6 GB/s +14%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1.4 GB/s 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1.4 GB/s
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1.4 GB/s +61%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1.2 GB/s +38%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1 GB/s +15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1 GB/s +15%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0.869 GB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0.854 GB/s -2%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12662 Points +17%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12228 Points +13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10856 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10788 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8898 Points -18%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	8823 Points -19%
Single-Core
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1986 Points +18%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1746 Points +4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1685 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1593 Points -5%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1552 Points -8%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1494 Points -11%

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12438 Points +16%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12141 Points +13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10747 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10676 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8868 Points -17%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	8568 Points -20%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1905 Points +15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1708 Points +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1659 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1596 Points -4%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1509 Points -9%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1421 Points -14%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8125 Points +17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6964 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6927 Points -1%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6734 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	6341 Points -9%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	6295 Points -10%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	49341 Points +27%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45250 Points +17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	38793 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	38648 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	35898 Points -7%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	34200 Points -12%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	22237 Points +26%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20846 Points +18%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	17624 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	17138 Points -3%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	16933 Points -4%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	16034 Points -9%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	71631 MIPS
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66438 MIPS
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	55067 MIPS
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	53954 MIPS
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0 MIPS
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0 MIPS
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6661 MIPS +30%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5521 MIPS +7%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5486 MIPS +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5485 MIPS +7%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5136 MIPS
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	4699 MIPS -9%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.9 fps +33%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.6 fps +25%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	16.7 fps +6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	15.7 fps
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	14.9 fps -5%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	13.3 fps -15%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.523 sec * -5%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.515 sec * -3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0.513 sec * -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0.4982 sec *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4652 sec * +7%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4346 sec * +13%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	70.9 s * -27%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	55.7 s *
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	54.3 s * +3%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	53.7 s * +4%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	51.2 s * +8%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.5 s * +20%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	323 Points +27%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	276 Points +9%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	275 Points +8%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	269 Points +6%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	254 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	254 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	653 ms * -15%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	595 ms * -5%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	591 ms * -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	567 ms *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	535 ms * +6%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	510 ms * +10%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26617 Points +16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	25043 Points +10%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	23807 Points +4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	22863 Points
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	22433 Points -2%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	21391 Points -6%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	11049 Points +27%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10014 Points +15%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	9182 Points +5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	8719 Points
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	8481 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8128 Points -7%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	9.415 s * -26%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7.839 s * -5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7.744 s * -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7.444 s *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7.168 s * +4%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7.158 s * +4%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	20.257 s * -23%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	19.101 s * -16%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	17.904 s * -9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	16.967 s * -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	16.446 s *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.125 s * +2%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	694.152 s * -76%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	653.976 s * -66%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	472.992 s * -20%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	423.565 s * -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	394.754 s * -0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	394.697 s *

Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Multi CPU)
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	770 Points +30%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	623 Points +5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	615 Points +4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	594 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	513 Points -14%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	439 Points -26%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

9561

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

16957 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

78788 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

13281 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

16752

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

53390

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.66 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

24.31 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

101.29 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

3.03 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

26.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

97.61 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

248 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2141 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

145.06 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

622 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5617 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

14516 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1721 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

102 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

815 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	97.2 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	77.3 pt
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	67.4 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	63.1 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	62.4 pt
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	61.4 pt
Average of class Mini PC	57.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	26514 KRay/s +99%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	17544 KRay/s +31%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	13726 KRay/s +3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	13639 KRay/s +2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	13347 KRay/s
Average of class Mini PC (646 - 51004, n=119, last 2 years)	12878 KRay/s -4%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	12468 KRay/s -7%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	112419 Points +64%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88829 Points +30%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	86223 Points +26%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	77847 Points +14%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	70880 Points +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	68551 Points
Average of class Mini PC (3857 - 214250, n=119, last 2 years)	64921 Points -5%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	4898 MB/s +47%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	4246 MB/s +28%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	3404 MB/s +2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	3323 MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	2953 MB/s -11%
Average of class Mini PC (260 - 9399, n=119, last 2 years)	2856 MB/s -14%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	2707 MB/s -19%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	119250 Points +49%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	98582 Points +23%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	91846 Points +15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89748 Points +12%
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=119, last 2 years)	80187 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	79866 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	78098 Points -2%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14976 Points +91%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	12159 Points +55%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	10972 Points +40%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10247 Points +31%
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=119, last 2 years)	8812 Points +12%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	7851 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	7842 Points 0%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	60098 Points +76%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	47463 Points +39%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	45718 Points +34%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	42543 Points +24%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	35321 Points +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	34225 Points
Average of class Mini PC (1987 - 113499, n=119, last 2 years)	33863 Points -1%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	167583 MB/s +161%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	144741 MB/s +126%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	119681 MB/s +87%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	108262 MB/s +69%
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=119, last 2 years)	88382 MB/s +38%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	65304 MB/s +2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	64107 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1183 MB/s +22%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	1015 MB/s +5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	994 MB/s +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	969 MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	757 MB/s -22%
Average of class Mini PC (74.9 - 2039, n=119, last 2 years)	740 MB/s -24%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	700 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14162 KRay/s +109%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9284 KRay/s +37%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	7279 KRay/s +7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	7221 KRay/s +6%
Average of class Mini PC (350 - 26952, n=119, last 2 years)	6881 KRay/s +1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	6786 KRay/s
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	6380 KRay/s -6%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	47377 MPixel/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	45789 MPixel/s -3%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	40690 MPixel/s -14%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33092 MPixel/s -30%
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=119, last 2 years)	28301 MPixel/s -40%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	26496 MPixel/s -44%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	25113 MPixel/s -47%

Cinebench R15 多回路

遗憾的是，在 Cinebench R15 连续循环测试中，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 无法保持比 Minforum UH125 Pro 稍高的 CPU 性能。 Minisforum UH125 Pro.CPU 温度的升高反复导致短期性能下降，这就是为什么结果不是很一致的原因。华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的平均成绩为 2,021 分，不敌 Minisforum UH125 Pro。

Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H: Ø2021 (1900.15-2203.13)

Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2563 (2486.79-2630.54)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H: Ø2186 (2040.4-2248.33)

Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø1983 (1919.75-2106.82)

Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)

Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1715 (1692.05-1838.74)

系统性能

系统性能完全反映了英特尔酷睿 5 125H.基于相同 SoC 的 Minisforum UH125 Pro 是主要竞争对手，其性能与华硕 NUC 14 Pro 相似。主观而言，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的日常性能非常出色，我们的测试样品在内存测试中稳居第二。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity

PCMark 10 / Score
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	7520 Points +20%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	7120 Points +13%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	6749 Points +7%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	6282 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	6194 Points -1%
Geekom A5, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), Lexar NM620 512GB	6149 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	11125 Points +11%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	11058 Points +10%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	10522 Points +5%
Geekom A5, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), Lexar NM620 512GB	10356 Points +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	10050 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	9427 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	10717 Points +52%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	9367 Points +33%
Geekom A5, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), Lexar NM620 512GB	9311 Points +32%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	8901 Points +26%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7715 Points +10%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	7042 Points

CrossMark: Overall | Responsiveness | Creativity | Productivity

CrossMark / Overall
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1813 Points +19%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1802 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1648 Points +8%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1533 Points +1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	1522 Points
Geekom A5, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), Lexar NM620 512GB	1429 Points -6%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1700 Points +45%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1566 Points +34%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1527 Points +30%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1332 Points +14%
Geekom A5, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), Lexar NM620 512GB	1233 Points +5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	1171 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	2011 Points +14%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1929 Points +9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	1765 Points
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1696 Points -4%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1683 Points -5%
Geekom A5, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), Lexar NM620 512GB	1523 Points -14%

CrossMark / Productivity
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1731 Points +21%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1717 Points +20%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1629 Points +14%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1463 Points +2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	1432 Points
Geekom A5, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), Lexar NM620 512GB	1408 Points -2%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	69592 MB/s 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	69264 MB/s
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	68449 MB/s -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	62397 MB/s -10%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	50829 MB/s -27%
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=119, last 2 years)	48357 MB/s -30%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	43870 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	74415 MB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	72711 MB/s -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	64323 MB/s -14%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	61836 MB/s -17%
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=119, last 2 years)	49177 MB/s -34%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	46241 MB/s -38%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	43828 MB/s -41%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	87118 MB/s +20%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	72443 MB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	71514 MB/s -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	65057 MB/s -10%
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=119, last 2 years)	52856 MB/s -27%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	51116 MB/s -29%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	46407 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	184.8 ns * -45%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	149 ns * -17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	127.3 ns *
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	104.1 ns * +18%
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, last 2 years)	92.1 ns * +28%
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	90 ns * +29%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8	81.4 ns * +36%

* ... smaller is better

UL Procyon for Windows
Overall Score Integer NPU
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	508 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	501 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	499 Points -2%
Overall Score Integer GPU
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	741 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	684 Points -8%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	547 Points -26%

DPC 延迟

华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的 DPC 延迟并不令人信服。即使只是上网冲浪，我们也能看到很高的延迟值，而在播放 4K 测试视频时，延迟值会进一步恶化。未来的 BIOS 或驱动程序更新可确保改善这一问题。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus NUC 14 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2776 μs *
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2724 μs * +2%
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	2198.8 μs * +21%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1438 μs * +48%
Geekom A5 Vega 8, R7 5800H, Lexar NM620 512GB	1310.5 μs * +53%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	962.8 μs * +65%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

我们为测试设备配备了金士顿 KC3000 固态硬盘。固态硬盘的理论性能在实践中无法实现。尽管如此，我们还是取得了相对不错的成绩，总成绩排名第三。在压力测试中可以看到一些小问题：在使用金士顿 SC3000 的情况下，读取性能无法长期保持在同一水平。

有关进一步的比较和基准测试，请访问我们的比较表。

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

Sequential Read: 3744 MB/s

Sequential Write: 2916 MB/s

512K Read: 2539 MB/s

512K Write: 2257 MB/s

4K Read: 62.03 MB/s

4K Write: 104.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 241 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 160.9 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	86.8 pt
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	76.3 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	70.6 pt
Average of class Mini PC	60.4 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	59.7 pt
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	59.2 pt
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	59 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4000 (3961.36^min - 3999.66^max) MB/s +8%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	3706 (3594.04^min - 3706.37^max) MB/s
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	2411 (2346.63^min - 2410.89^max) MB/s -35%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	2371 (2315.68^min - 2370.91^max) MB/s -36%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2351 (2320.68^min - 2350.61^max) MB/s -37%
Average of class Mini PC (277 - 4357, n=119, last 2 years)	2333 MB/s -37%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1674 (1242.56^min - 1673.54^max) MB/s -55%
seq write
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4553 (4417.86^min - 4552.92^max) MB/s +55%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	3650 (3239.07^min - 3649.71^max) MB/s +25%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3331 (3244.92^min - 3330.75^max) MB/s +14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2928 (1958.53^min - 2927.62^max) MB/s
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	2668 (292.6^min - 2668^max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Mini PC (229 - 5595, n=119, last 2 years)	2509 MB/s -14%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1348 (1117.85^min - 1347.87^max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	7110 (6058.21^min - 7110.02^max) MB/s
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	4939 (4360.49^min - 4938.56^max) MB/s -31%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4878 (4476.29^min - 4877.98^max) MB/s -31%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4802 (4169.19^min - 4801.68^max) MB/s -32%
Average of class Mini PC (236 - 8430, n=119, last 2 years)	3790 MB/s -47%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	3444 (2979.63^min - 3443.98^max) MB/s -52%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3194 (2810.81^min - 3194.17^max) MB/s -55%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	4712 (3064.99^min - 4711.88^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4505 (4403.81^min - 4505.09^max) MB/s -4%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	4273 (4238.26^min - 4272.58^max) MB/s -9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3902 (3839.68^min - 3901.75^max) MB/s -17%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	3117 (3075.4^min - 3117.21^max) MB/s -34%
Average of class Mini PC (239 - 6669, n=119, last 2 years)	2810 MB/s -40%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2212 (1222.43^min - 2212.27^max) MB/s -53%
4k q1 t1 read
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	61.7 (61.26^min - 61.71^max) MB/s +16%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	60 (58.44^min - 60.02^max) MB/s +12%
Average of class Mini PC (6.85 - 86.6, n=119, last 2 years)	55.3 MB/s +4%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	54.5 (37.15^min - 54.54^max) MB/s +2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	53.4 (49.89^min - 53.35^max) MB/s
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	48.1 (43.1^min - 48.11^max) MB/s -10%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	47.3 (47.07^min - 47.31^max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 write
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	235 (230.8^min - 235.02^max) MB/s +183%
Average of class Mini PC (30.4 - 435, n=119, last 2 years)	196.9 MB/s +137%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	187.2 (181.54^min - 187.2^max) MB/s +125%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	184.8 (177.47^min - 184.84^max) MB/s +122%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	148.4 (147.43^min - 148.38^max) MB/s +79%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	136.8 (131.56^min - 136.81^max) MB/s +65%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	83.1 (75.3^min - 83.11^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2004 (2002.37^min - 2004.23^max) MB/s +174%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	1960 MB/s +168%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1824 (1239.47^min - 1824.09^max) MB/s +150%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1580 (1549.8^min - 1579.65^max) MB/s +116%
Average of class Mini PC (26.1 - 4158, n=119, last 2 years)	1411 MB/s +93%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	731 (660.89^min - 731.29^max) MB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	698 (691.89^min - 697.84^max) MB/s -5%
4k q32 t16 write
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2681 (2560.18^min - 2680.76^max) MB/s +1336%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1434 (1410.26^min - 1433.71^max) MB/s +668%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	1370 (84.65^min - 1370.23^max) MB/s +634%
Average of class Mini PC (32.6 - 4288, n=119, last 2 years)	1332 MB/s +613%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	627 (618.33^min - 627.08^max) MB/s +236%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	311 (252.72^min - 310.91^max) MB/s +67%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	186.7 (155.05^min - 186.74^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	6354 Points +24%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	6147 Points +20%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	5131 Points
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	4412 Points -14%
Average of class Mini PC (211 - 10021, n=117, last 2 years)	4244 Points -17%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	4006 Points -22%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3878 Points -24%
Score Read
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2109 Points +65%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1757 Points +38%
Average of class Mini PC (76 - 3741, n=117, last 2 years)	1578 Points +24%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1561 Points +22%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	1502 Points +18%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	1275 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1096 Points -14%
Score Write
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	3759 Points +13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	3313 Points
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2964 Points -11%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2306 Points -30%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2082 Points -37%
Average of class Mini PC (88 - 4371, n=117, last 2 years)	1902 Points -43%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	1739 Points -48%
Seq Read
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	5158 MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4264 MB/s -17%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	3891 MB/s -25%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3808 MB/s -26%
Average of class Mini PC (291 - 6620, n=117, last 2 years)	3231 MB/s -37%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	3020 MB/s -41%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3010 MB/s -42%
Seq Write
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	3970 MB/s +50%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	2714 MB/s +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2646 MB/s
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	2526 MB/s -5%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2369 MB/s -10%
Average of class Mini PC (242 - 5783, n=117, last 2 years)	2292 MB/s -13%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1787 MB/s -32%
4K Read
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	68.4 MB/s +8%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	63.6 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC (21.4 - 104.3, n=117, last 2 years)	59.7 MB/s -6%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	57.7 MB/s -9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	57.3 MB/s -10%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	55.2 MB/s -13%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	41.8 MB/s -34%
4K Write
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	196.9 MB/s +16%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	196.5 MB/s +16%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	195.5 MB/s +15%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	182.1 MB/s +7%
Average of class Mini PC (30.9 - 366, n=117, last 2 years)	177.5 MB/s +5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	169.5 MB/s
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	125.5 MB/s -26%
4K-64 Read
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1614 MB/s +132%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	1313 MB/s +89%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1218 MB/s +75%
Average of class Mini PC (23.4 - 3220, n=117, last 2 years)	1195 MB/s +72%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	1143 MB/s +64%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	695 MB/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	658 MB/s -5%
4K-64 Write
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	3311 MB/s +15%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2878 MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2370 MB/s -18%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1945 MB/s -32%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1649 MB/s -43%
Average of class Mini PC (32.8 - 3731, n=117, last 2 years)	1495 MB/s -48%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	1342 MB/s -53%
Access Time Read
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.101 ms * -91%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	0.098 ms * -85%
Average of class Mini PC (0.022 - 0.489, n=117, last 2 years)	0.09579 ms * -81%
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	0.08 ms * -51%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	0.077 ms * -45%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	0.053 ms *
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.046 ms * +13%
Access Time Write
Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB	0.13 ms * -202%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.126 ms * -193%
Average of class Mini PC (0.014 - 0.765, n=117, last 2 years)	0.1133 ms * -163%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	0.061 ms * -42%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	0.043 ms *
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.024 ms * +44%
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	0.023 ms * +47%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6306 (1073.74-7111.48)

Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4932 (4634.29-4944.25)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4790 (4223.81-4803.95)

Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4833 (4418.07-4847.99)

Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)

Geekom A5 Lexar NM620 512GB: Ø3437 (3126.47-3454.22)

图形卡

由于采用了改进的英特尔 Arc 架构，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的 3D 性能明显优于采用 96 EUs 的老款英特尔 Iris Xe G7。不过英特尔弧形 7 核iGPU 无法赶上 AMD Radeon 780M。尽管如此，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 性能出众，我们的测试样品在与 Acemagic F2A在多项测试中胜出。

更多比较和基准测试请参见我们的GPU 对比表。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	97.6 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	93 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	92.9 pt
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	84.6 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	81.8 pt
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	49.9 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	13824 Points +17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12085 Points +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	11785 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	11668 Points -1%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10303 Points -13%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	7101 Points -40%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3205 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3205 Points
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2970 Points -7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2796 Points -13%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2518 Points -21%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1418 Points -56%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8437 Points +7%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7900 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7710 Points -2%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7653 Points -3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7047 Points -11%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4567 Points -42%

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	37 fps +11%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	33.3 fps
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	33.2 fps 0%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	31.6 fps -5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	29.6 fps -11%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	22.8 fps -32%
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	36.1 fps +5%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	34.7 fps +1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	34.5 fps
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32.7 fps -5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	31.5 fps -9%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	22 fps -36%

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	24.5 fps +30%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	23.7 fps +26%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	18.8 fps
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.1 fps -9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	16.9 fps -10%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	14.2 fps -24%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	25.5 fps +26%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	20.2 fps
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	19.2 fps -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18.3 fps -9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	18.3 fps -9%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	14.7 fps -27%

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12146 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	11940 Points +10%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10872 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10491 Points -4%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10026 Points -8%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	7952 Points -27%
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3698 Points +2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3609 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3391 Points -6%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	3380 Points -6%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3066 Points -15%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1949 Points -46%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1981 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1920 Points -3%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1803 Points -9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1686 Points -15%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1424 Points -28%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	914 Points -54%

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9806 Points +46%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7480 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	6763 Points +1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6698 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5613 Points -16%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4020 Points -40%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	490 Points
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	481 Points -2%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	471 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	427 Points -13%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	427 Points -13%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	296 Points -40%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	486 Points +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	472 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	468 Points -1%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	439 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	422 Points -11%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	280 Points -41%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2560 Points +49%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1961 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1900 Points +11%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1715 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1447 Points -16%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1236 Points -28%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2614 Points +92%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1812 Points +33%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1594 Points +17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1360 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1112 Points -18%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1062 Points -22%
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3665 Points +38%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3076 Points +16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2662 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2157 Points -19%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2143 Points -19%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1145 Points -57%

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1025 Samples/s +28%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	801 Samples/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	710 Samples/s -11%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	567 Samples/s -29%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	549 Samples/s -31%
Sala GPUs-only
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2807 Samples/s
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2517 Samples/s -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2319 Samples/s -17%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2312 Samples/s -18%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1288 Samples/s -54%

Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5244 Points +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5105 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4928 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2339 Points -54%
Geekom AE7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1889 Points -63%
Geekom A5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1683 Points -67%

	Asus NUC 14 Pro, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU Ultra 5 125H	Geekom AE7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS	Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU Ultra 5 125H	Aoostar GEM10, AMD Radeon 680M R7 6800H	Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H	Geekom A5, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) R7 5800H	Average of class Mini PC
SPECviewperf 2020		236%	-8%	217%	1%	83%	154%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	5.87	12.7 116%	4.8 -18%	10.7 82%	5.05 -14%	4.82 -18%	7.85 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=66, last 2 years) 34%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	3.81	14.4 278%	3.38 -11%	10.6 178%	4.61 21%	5.33 40%	11.3 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=66, last 2 years) 197%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	15.3	30.2 97%	15.4 1%	32 109%	17.9 17%	19.1 25%	30.7 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=66, last 2 years) 101%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	10.4	23.7 128%	9.7 -7%	22.8 119%	10 -4%	13.1 26%	18.6 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=65, last 2 years) 79%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	14.5	20.7 43%	13.2 -9%	18.9 30%	12.9 -11%	11.3 -22%	22.5 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=66, last 2 years) 55%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	5.82	61.3 953%	5.54 -5%	61.4 955%	5.7 -2%	38 553%	37.2 ?(2.25 - 224, n=64, last 2 years) 539%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	34.7	47.4 37%	32.8 -5%	49.7 43%	35.4 2%	25.8 -26%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 223, n=66, last 2 years) 70%

3DMark 05 Standard		48550 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score		40475 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		39395 points
3DMark 11 Performance		11870 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		126152 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		29960 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7302 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		3819 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3540 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		699 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2798 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

华硕 NUC 14 Pro 只在有限的范围内适用于现代游戏。不过，与配备 96 个 EU 的旧版英特尔 Iris Xe G7 相比，游戏性能有了明显提高。在 3D 性能方面，英特尔在与 AMD iGPU 的对决中败下阵来，这一点比合成测试中更为明显。为了更好地对 iGPU 的性能进行分类，我们参考了我们的 GPU 游戏列表.

GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	168 (6.33^min, 125^P1) fps +7%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	161 (4.76^min, 100^P1) fps +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	156.3 (4.92^min, 90.9^P1) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	145.3 (5.31^min, 100^P1) fps -7%
Geekom A5 Vega 8, R7 5800H, Lexar NM620 512GB	140.1 (17.4^min, 90.9^P1) fps -10%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	132.4 (4.93^min, 90.9^P1) fps -15%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	65.1 (2.93^min, 29.4^P1) fps +63%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	53.9 (3.82^min, 38.5^P1) fps +35%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	39.9 (3.1^min, 29.4^P1) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	38.9 (3.15^min, 28.6^P1) fps -3%
Geekom A5 Vega 8, R7 5800H, Lexar NM620 512GB	35.1 (10.8^min, 25.6^P1) fps -12%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	31.3 (2.94^min, 22.7^P1) fps -22%

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	163 (143.1^min) fps +68%
Geekom A5 Vega 8, R7 5800H, Lexar NM620 512GB	129.5 (112.6^min) fps +33%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	124 (8.9^min) fps +28%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	103.2 (59.8^min) fps +6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	97.1 (61.8^min) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	95.5 (63.7^min) fps -2%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	89.8 (75.7^min) fps +18%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	81.6 (72.3^min) fps +8%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	77.3 (52.5^min) fps +2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	75.9 (45.7^min) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	73.6 (47.5^min) fps -3%
Geekom A5 Vega 8, R7 5800H, Lexar NM620 512GB	67.7 (59.9^min) fps -11%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	45 (38^min) fps +50%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	34.8 (29.9^min) fps +16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	30.1 (25.8^min) fps
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	29.5 (24.1^min) fps -2%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	29.5 (25.4^min) fps -2%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	27.4 (23.1^min) fps +26%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	21.7 (18.8^min) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	21.3 (18.4^min) fps -2%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	20.6 (17.9^min) fps -5%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	20.4 (13.8^min) fps -6%

Baldur's Gate 3
1280x720 Low Preset
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	67.4 (22.7^min, 28.3^P0.1, 43.6^P1) fps +34%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	50.2 (27.7^min, 29.7^P0.1, 32.6^P1) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	48.9 (16.6^min, 29.1^P0.1, 36.8^P1) fps -3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	45 (14.9^min, 19.4^P0.1, 29^P1) fps -10%
1920x1080 High Preset
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	25.7 (11^min, 11.5^P0.1, 14.5^P1) fps +15%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	23.3 (16.6^min, 16.7^P0.1, 18.3^P1) fps +4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	22.4 (14^min, 14.2^P0.1, 15.3^P1) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	19.5 (9.2^min, 10.4^P0.1, 12.7^P1) fps -13%

F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	94.8 (81^min, 64^P1) fps +43%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	66.2 (56^min, 54^P1) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	64.3 (55^min, 53^P1) fps -3%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB	59.5 (50^min, 41^P1) fps +37%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	43.4 (34^min, 35^P1) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	41.7 (34^min, 34^P1) fps -4%

FPS chart

Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core: Ø18.5 (12.6-20.7)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	156.3	148.8	39.9	16.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	97.1	79.2	75.9	72.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	60.6	35.4	25.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	47.5	38.5	32.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	33.5	25.9	22.4	21.5
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	30.1	25.2	21.7	19.6
F1 24 (2024)	66.2	57.6	43.4

使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 的华硕 NUC 14 Pro 性能测试

使用外置显卡可以明显提高 3D 性能。不过，外置 3D 加速器只能通过 USB-C 接口连接。在不影响总体评分的情况下，我们结合 Razer Core X 和 Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 进行了一些测试。英伟达GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.我们持续看到了 3D 性能的提升，即使是现代游戏现在也能畅通无阻地进行。与 Minisforum UH125 Pro相比，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的性能完全相同。

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	99.2 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	98.6 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	97.4 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	96.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	34907 Points +196%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	33454 Points +184%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	32085 Points +172%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	31917 Points +171%
	11785 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11180 Points +249%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	11118 Points +247%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10935 Points +241%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10932 Points +241%
	3205 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	25665 Points +225%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	25415 Points +222%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	24809 Points +214%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	24767 Points +214%
	7900 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7103 Points +274%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7046 Points +271%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7024 Points +270%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6997 Points +268%
	1899 Points

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	33452 Points +208%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	31986 Points +194%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	27554 Points +153%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	25121 Points +131%
	10872 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15070 Points +318%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	14959 Points +314%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	14910 Points +313%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	14859 Points +312%
	3609 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7117 Points +259%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7111 Points +259%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7098 Points +258%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7064 Points +257%
	1981 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	9315 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	9243 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	9206 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	9188 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	4061 Points
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	4047 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	4016 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	4013 Points

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	142.2 fps +656%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	141.7 fps +654%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	137.3 fps +630%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	135.9 fps +623%
	18.8 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	137.6 fps +581%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	137.6 fps +581%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	133.8 fps +562%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	133.5 fps +561%
	20.2 fps

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	174.9 fps +425%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	173.5 fps +421%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	172.4 fps +418%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	172.3 fps +417%
	33.3 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	164.2 fps +376%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	163.2 fps +373%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	158.8 fps +360%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	158.7 fps +360%
	34.5 fps

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	27843 Points +316%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	27843 Points +316%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	27669 Points +313%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	26591 Points +297%
	6698 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2708 Points +453%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2683 Points +448%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2681 Points +447%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2681 Points +447%
	490 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2641 Points +460%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2618 Points +455%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2614 Points +454%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2614 Points +454%
	472 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	5726 Points +234%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5726 Points +234%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5652 Points +230%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5358 Points +212%
	1715 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	6275 Points +361%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6275 Points +361%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6223 Points +358%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5949 Points +337%
	1360 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	10548 Points +296%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10548 Points +296%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10445 Points +292%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	9982 Points +275%
	2662 Points

Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	99.5 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	94.6 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	88.3 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	88 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	103.1 (80.9^min - 132.1^max) fps +123%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	88.7 (68^min - 118.2^max) fps +92%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	72.4 (53.9^min - 101^max) fps +56%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	70.2 (53.5^min - 91.7^max) fps +52%
	46.3 (39.2^min - 54.8^max) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	81.5 (65.7^min - 103.4^max) fps +223%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	81.4 (65.1^min - 102^max) fps +223%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	72.2 (55.8^min - 97.4^max) fps +187%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	69.8 (50^min - 99.9^max) fps +177%
	25.2 (22.3^min - 29^max) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	64.4 (49.9^min - 85.5^max) fps +229%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	64.3 (50.9^min - 85.8^max) fps +228%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	60.8 (43.6^min - 87^max) fps +210%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	58.3 (36.6^min - 87.8^max) fps +197%
	19.6 (16.7^min - 23.6^max) fps

Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	113 (47.4^min, 65.4^P0.1, 77.5^P1 - 215^max) fps +237%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	111.6 (57.7^min, 64.3^P0.1, 75.6^P1 - 248^max) fps +233%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	110.9 (57.4^min, 66.9^P0.1, 76.7^P1 - 233^max) fps +231%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	109.5 (51.8^min, 62.3^P0.1, 74.4^P1 - 198.7^max) fps +227%
	33.5 (20.9^min, 21^P0.1, 23.4^P1 - 64.9^max) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	91.3 (51.4^min, 53.4^P0.1, 61.1^P1 - 196.3^max) fps +253%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	89.4 (43.6^min, 53.5^P0.1, 60^P1 - 201^max) fps +245%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	87.3 (36.9^min, 43.6^P0.1, 57.2^P1 - 191.9^max) fps +237%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	86 (30.5^min, 43.2^P0.1, 55.8^P1 - 194.6^max) fps +232%
	25.9 (5.81^min, 8.8^P0.1, 15.9^P1 - 97.2^max) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	78.5 (46.2^min, 47^P0.1, 53.1^P1 - 179.1^max) fps +265%
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	78.2 (23.4^min, 47.3^P0.1, 51.1^P1 - 216^max) fps +264%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	76.3 (41.3^min, 43.7^P0.1, 50^P1 - 176.1^max) fps +255%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	72.1 (20.2^min, 24.7^P0.1, 31.8^P1 - 189.9^max) fps +235%
	21.5 (13.6^min, 13.7^P0.1, 14.1^P1 - 66^max) fps

F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	86.5 (48^min, 51^P1 - 108^max) fps +31%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	76.9 (42^min, 44^P1 - 96^max) fps +16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	75.3 (42^min, 44^P1 - 92^max) fps +14%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	72.6 (41^min, 43^P1 - 87^max) fps +10%
	66.2 (56^min, 54^P1 - 77^max) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	82.3 (47^min, 49^P1 - 97^max) fps +43%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	73.1 (42^min, 43^P1 - 86^max) fps +27%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	71.7 (41^min, 43^P1 - 84^max) fps +24%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	70 (41^min, 42^P1 - 81^max) fps +22%
	57.6 (47^min, 46^P1 - 68^max) fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	68.7 (40^min, 40^P1 - 82^max) fps +58%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	60.5 (35^min, 37^P1 - 74^max) fps +39%
Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	59.5 (35^min, 35^P1 - 72^max) fps +37%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	58.2 (34^min, 36^P1 - 71^max) fps +34%
	43.4 (34^min, 35^P1 - 51^max) fps

	Asus NUC 14 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), Ultra 5 125H	Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), Ultra 5 125H	Geekom AX8 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 8945HS	Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H	Average of class Mini PC
SPECviewperf 2020	290%	126%	304%	300%	154%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	13 121%	10.9 86%	13 121%	13 121%	7.85 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=66, last 2 years) 34%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	20.9 449%	17.8 367%	21 451%	20.9 449%	11.3 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=66, last 2 years) 197%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	68.3 346%	26.6 74%	77.2 405%	74.2 385%	30.7 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=66, last 2 years) 101%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	37.3 259%	23.6 127%	39.2 277%	39.4 279%	18.6 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=65, last 2 years) 79%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	46.5 221%	28.7 98%	46.1 218%	47.2 226%	22.5 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=66, last 2 years) 55%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	16.2 178%	11.4 96%	16.7 187%	16.5 184%	37.2 ?(2.25 - 224, n=64, last 2 years) 539%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	193 456%	47.5 37%	198 471%	194 459%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 223, n=66, last 2 years) 70%

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	178.7	174	162.9	100.6	90	102.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	159	138.8	131	122.6		104.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	163.8	141	97.3		75.6	47.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	119.6	107.5	83.7			71.7
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	111.6	86	72.8	72.1	57.5	36.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	72.4	69.8	63.7	58.3	43.5	22.2
F1 24 (2024)	75.3	71.7	59.5	41.1	35.7	16.9

排放量

噪音排放

华硕 NUC 14 Pro 大部分时间都非常安静。不过，风扇在空闲模式下也会工作，因此运行时并不安静。在平均负载下，我们记录到的声压级为 42.4 dB(A)。在 Minisforum UH125 Pro和 Aoostar GEM10 的声压级大致相同。在最大负载时，我们的测试样本达到了 47.8 dB(A)。这意味着华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的噪音水平虽然主观感觉略低，但仍清晰可闻。

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 26.2 / 26.2 dB(A)
Load		42.4 / 47.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom A5 R7 5800H, Vega 8
Noise		-4%	-12%	-13%	-2%	-7%
off / environment *	24	24.4 -2%	24.8 -3%	24.3 -1%	24.9 -4%	25 -4%
Idle Minimum *	26	24.9 4%	35 -35%	36.5 -40%	25.4 2%	28.2 -8%
Idle Average *	26.2	25 5%	35 -34%	36.6 -40%	25.7 2%	28.2 -8%
Idle Maximum *	26.2	25 5%	35 -34%	36.6 -40%	25.7 2%	28.2 -8%
Load Average *	42.4	52 -23%	42.2 -0%	41.7 2%	47.8 -13%	47.8 -13%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	47.7	52 -9%	40.8 14%	40.3 16%
Load Maximum *	47.8	51.4 -8%	43.9 8%	40.8 15%	49 -3%	47.4 1%
Witcher 3 ultra *				40.18	45.23

* ... smaller is better

温度

在负载情况下，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的外壳会在某些地方明显发热。我们在顶部记录到的最高温度为 55.1 °C。空闲模式下没有明显异常。在压力测试中，SoC 的温度很容易超过 100 °C。根据英特尔的说法，英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125H 的设计工作温度最高可达 110 °C。我们在压力测试中达到了这一目标，尽管功耗因此降低到 50 瓦左右。冷却系统无法永久耗散定义为 PL1 和 PL2 的 64 瓦功率。

Max. Load

Idle


38.3 °C	50.5 °C	55.1 °C
34.9 °C	39.3 °C	32.9 °C
35.1 °C	35.9 °C	30.5 °C

Maximum: 55.1 °C
Average: 39.2 °C


36.6 °C	38.2 °C	39.3 °C
33.6 °C	36.1 °C	37.7 °C
31.1 °C	32.7 °C	36.6 °C

Maximum: 39.3 °C
Average: 35.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.1 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.

耗电量

华硕对 NUC 14 Pro 的功耗控制得相对较好。在平均负载情况下，我们的测试样品仅需 55.5 瓦，比 Miniforum UH125 Pro 稍高。原因是华硕对 SoC 的功率限制略高。我们简要记录了 103.3 瓦的功率，120 瓦的电源可以轻松应对。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.48 / 1 Watt
Idle	5.1 / 6.4 / 14.7 Watt
Load	55.5 / 103.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom A5 R7 5800H, Vega 8	Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	Average of class Mini PC
Power Consumption		3%	-38%	-11%	-29%	-3%	-6%	-36%
Idle Minimum *	5.1	4.5 12%	11.9 -133%	7.3 -43%	9.1 -78%	6.9 -35%	6.88 ?(3 - 11.9, n=6) -35%	9.69 ?(1.9 - 45.7, n=121, last 2 years) -90%
Idle Average *	6.4	4.7 27%	14.6 -128%	8.7 -36%	10.3 -61%	7.9 -23%	9.02 ?(6.3 - 14.6, n=6) -41%	11.9 ?(1.9 - 47.5, n=119, last 2 years) -86%
Idle Maximum *	14.7	8.1 45%	15.4 -5%	10.4 29%	14.4 2%	8.9 39%	12.2 ?(6.5 - 16, n=6) 17%	15.2 ?(2.6 - 57.1, n=121, last 2 years) -3%
Load Average *	55.5	81.8 -47%	48.3 13%	67.2 -21%	54.9 1%	60.8 -10%	51.4 ?(48.3 - 55.5, n=6) 7%	59 ?(11.3 - 170.6, n=121, last 2 years) -6%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	59.1	71.2 -20%	52.7 11%	58.8 1%
Load Maximum *	103.3	100.3 3%	89.8 13%	101.6 2%	110.4 -7%	89.7 13%	78.3 ?(65.5 - 103.3, n=6) 24%	100.5 ?(18.1 - 423, n=121, last 2 years) 3%

* ... smaller is better

Efficiency

Performance Rating | Power Consumption

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	96.2 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	80.9 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	80.4 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78.5 pt

Power Consumption
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	238 Points per Watt +45%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	183.7 Points per Watt +12%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	181.1 Points per Watt +11%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	163.7 Points per Watt
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	69.4 Points per Watt
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	61.4 Points per Watt -12%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	57.1 Points per Watt -18%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	54.2 Points per Watt -22%
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor)
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	33.2 Points per Watt +38%
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	28 Points per Watt +17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	26.6 Points per Watt +11%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	24 Points per Watt

Power consumtion with the external monitor

Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.48 (4.52-12)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø14.4 (13.7-16.8)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9.01 (8.45-10.4)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø63.2 (61.3-86)

Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø90.8 (85.1-98.5)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø82.9 (81.3-87.6)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø87.3 (85-101.6)

Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø59.1 (55.8-67.9)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø52.7 (51.9-55.2)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø58.8 (56.1-62.3)

Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø55.5 (51.2-61.4)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø48.4 (45.1-51.5)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø67.2 (55.9-76)

Power consumtion with the external monitor

Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø90.6 (79.2-103.3)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83 (67.7-89.8)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø76.4 (71.4-100.8)

Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø89.2 (88-90.9)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.3 (80-81.4)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.9 (81.6-97.1)

Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø24.8 (20.8-58)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø28.7 (27-62.8)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø30.1 (28.4-45.5)

Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø88.7 (86.9-91.6)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.4 (79.8-81.1)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø78.2 (71.1-95.8)

Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø56.9 (53.6-63.3)

Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø48 (46.2-53.5)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø76.4 (69.1-84.4)

Pros

+ 坚固、紧凑的外壳

+ 配备 P 核和 E 核的现代 SoC

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 易于打开（无需工具）

+ 2x Thunderbolt

+ 快速无线局域网

+ 多种 BIOS 设置

+ 36 个月保修

Cons

- 在负载情况下可听到

- DPC 延迟时间长

- 冷却装置很快达到极限

评价：具有丰富 BIOS 选项的商务小型 PC

众所周知的 NUC 迷你 PC 曾经由英特尔公司直接销售，现在华硕以同样的方式继续销售。基于 Meteor Lake 处理器，这款小巧的 PC 在 3D 性能方面得到了明显的提升。

与我们熟悉的 NUC 迷你 PC 相比，华硕在设计方面没有太大变化。如果能采用全金属外壳就更好了，因为华硕 NUC 14 Pro 在这方面不如某些竞争对手。就尺寸而言，这款迷你 PC 比许多其他设备都要小。遗憾的是，这种设计导致所有制造商都不得不做出妥协。SoC 的性能必须得到可靠的发挥。如果没有持续负载，华硕 NUC 14 Pro 实际上能很好地做到这一点。华硕将温度限制在了英特尔酷睿 5 125H这肯定会让一些用户惊出一身冷汗。原则上，处理器就是为这些温度范围设计的。同时，BIOS 提供的许多选项也会影响处理器的温度极限。在这里可以手动设置极限。不过，预计性能会略有降低。值得强调的是其出色的连接性：板载多个 USB 端口和两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口。此外，还配备了快速 Wi-Fi 和 2.5G LAN。

华硕 NUC 14 Pro 是一款功能强大的 NUC 微型电脑。其连接性优于大多数竞争对手，丰富的 BIOS 选项也是一个真正的卖点。

华硕 NUC 14 Pro 的价格并不完全离谱。510 欧元的裸机价格当然不便宜。不过，其竞争对手的价格（包括固态硬盘、内存和操作系统）很可能超过 700 欧元。在性价比方面， Aoostar GEM10的售价已达 459 美元。

注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击这里.

价格和供应情况

华硕 NUC 14 Pro 有多种配置可供选择。这款配备英特尔酷睿5 125H处理器的迷你电脑目前的售价为500欧元。我们的测试设备已在Alternate和Notebooksbilliger 上架。搭载相同 SoC 的 Tall 选项可为 2.5 英寸数据载体提供额外空间，也可在Alternate或 Notebooksbilliger 订购。价格约为 520 欧元。

Asus NUC 14 Pro - 08/26/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

81 / 98 → 83%

Connectivity

58 / 81 → 71%

Weight

83%

Games Performance

47 / 80 → 59%

Application Performance

80 / 92 → 87%

Workstation

28%

AI Performance

77%

Temperature

87%

Noise

80%

Average

54%

75%

Mini PC - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
25%

Power Use
77.5%

Repairability
30%

Software Updates
50%

Total Sustainability Score: 34.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (min) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28.1
...
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	805
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	812
Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	814
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	815
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	817
Tulpar T7 V20.6 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	818
Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	818
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

华硕 NUC 14 Pro 评测：配备 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H、快速 Intel Arc iGPU 和 2x Thunderbolt 4 的 NUC 迷你 PC

不是视觉亮点！

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 黑色塑料外壳覆盖金属外壳

尺寸比较

设备

交流

配件

维护

可持续性

性能

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 多回路

系统性能

DPC 延迟

大容量存储器

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

FPS chart

使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 的华硕 NUC 14 Pro 性能测试

排放量

噪音排放

温度

耗电量

Efficiency

Power consumtion with the external monitor

Power consumtion with the external monitor

Pros

Cons

评价：具有丰富 BIOS 选项的商务小型 PC

价格和供应情况

Transparency

Price comparison

More articles related to this device

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	11842
Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	11845
Gigabyte Aero 14 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11868
Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	11870
HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	11902
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M	11902
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	11913
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609