Notebookcheck Logo

Minisforum UH125 Pro 评测:配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 125H、32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘的 AI 迷你 PC,价格不菲

将人工智能作为营销工具?

Minisforum 正在更新其基于英特尔流星湖处理器的机型系列:UH125 Pro 基于英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 125H。您还可以期待丰富的连接功能,目前最先进的连接功能包括 USB4 和 OCuLink。我们对该设备进行了详细了解,并根据大量测量和基准测试分析了其性能。
Mini PC Desktop Intel Arc Meteor Lake GPU

制造商自己宣传 Minisforum UH125 Pro 是一款功能强大的 AI 迷你 PC,带有 OCuLink 连接。处理器为 英特尔酷睿 5 125H处理器,其独立的 NPU 肯定能提供一定的附加值。不过,我们现在也可以在其他 SoC 中找到这一选项。Minisforum 没有为 UH125 Pro 提供其他 CPU 配置。购买 Minisforum UH125 Pro 时,买家需要在裸机和我们的测试配置之间做出选择。不含内存和固态硬盘的设备预购价格为 499 欧元。而正常价格为 629 欧元。如果你想购买配备 32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘的 Minisforum UH125 Pro,你就得掏更多的钱了:目前的建议零售价为 879 欧元。不过,Minisforum 在预购阶段的售价为 699 欧元。

就价格而言,Minisforum UH125 Pro 既没有正面的优势,也没有负面的劣势。下表列出了 Minisforum UH125 Pro 的竞争对手。

Minisforum UH125 Pro
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 14 x 3.6 - 4.5 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Core: 2200 MHz, 31.0.101.5594 DCH
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600 MT/s, max 96GB
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, 1024 GB 
, 930 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5mm combo jack, Card Reader: SD (Full-Size), Realtek Semiconductor RTL8126 PCIe Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), OCuLink
Networking
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8126 PCIe Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 49 x 145 x 145
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Additional features
120W power adapter, VESA-Mount, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
797 g, Power Supply: 278 g
Price
879 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Price
74.5 %v8
07 / 2024
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
797 g49 mm
80.8 %v8
06 / 2024
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
653 g60 mm
78 %v8
07 / 2024
Geekom AE7
R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
578 g49.2 mm
72.1 %v8
06 / 2024
Geekom GT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
440 g37 mm
82.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
615 g55 mm
82.3 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Acemagic AM18
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
600 g58 mm

注:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里可在此处查阅。

Minisforum UH125 Pro 的详细介绍

迷你论坛 UH125 Pro
迷你论坛 UH125 Pro
迷你论坛 UH125 Pro
迷你论坛 UH125 Pro
迷你论坛 UH125 Pro
迷你论坛 UH125 Pro
迷你论坛 UH125 Pro
Minisforum UH125 Pro - 正面
Minisforum UH125 Pro - 后视图
Minisforum UH125 Pro - 左侧
Minisforum UH125 Pro - 右侧
Minisforum UH125 Pro 带电源装置(19 V;6.32 A)
供电装置(19 伏;6.32 安)

外壳 - 铝和塑料的完美结合

Minisforum UH125 Pro 仅以黑色销售。制造商采用了铝和塑料混合材料。虽然外壳的主要部分由金属制成,但在顶部和底部可以找到塑料。这使设备具有出色的稳定性,同时做工也无可挑剔。电源按钮和 Copilot 按钮位于顶部。后者只是一个启动 Copilot 助手的按钮。不过,这一功能在实际使用中是否会经常用到还是个问题。

与同类产品相比,Minisforum UH125 Pro 占用的桌面空间略大。就高度而言,我们的测试设备位居中游,不过 49 毫米的高度并没有使设备显得笨重。Minisforum UH125 Pro 的宽度和深度均为 14.5 厘米,其内部空间足以容纳一个强大而高效的散热装置。Minisforum UH125 Pro 还可以通过 VESA 支架安装到显示器上。

尺寸比较

145 mm 145 mm 49 mm 797 g130 mm 130 mm 60 mm 653 g130 mm 134 mm 58 mm 600 g127 mm 127 mm 55 mm 615 g117 mm 112 mm 49.2 mm 578 g112.4 mm 112.4 mm 37 mm 440 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

设备 - 双版本 USB4 和 OCuLink

Minisforum UH125 Pro 在接口选择方面表现出色。接口的数量和选择都非常出色。两个 USB4 接口不一定是迷你 PC 的标准。然而,Minisforum 证明这是可能的。制造商还安装了一个 OCuLink 端口,主要用于外接显卡。Minisforum 本身已经发布了自己的型号。端口的位置很好,但并不完美。DisplayPort 连接在这里显得有些消极。如果使用的是底层 USB-A,则几乎不可能取下 DisplayPort 电缆,因为它通常都有一个卡扣。也可以通过 HDMI 控制屏幕。如果同时使用两个 USB4 端口进行图像输出,则可以在 Minisforum UH125 Pro 上同时操作多达四个屏幕。

Minisforum UH125 Pro 配备了 SD 读卡器,但就性能而言,建议仅在有限的范围内使用。配备速度更快的 UHS-II 读卡器的设备的传输速率要高得多。因此,我们测试设备中的 SD 读卡器更像是一种应急解决方案。

关于 OCuLink 连接的重要说明:制造商指出,该接口不支持热插拔,这意味着在连接设备前必须关闭迷你电脑。在最坏的情况下,忽略这一功能可能会导致设备损坏。 Aoostar也明确指出了这一点,并在其设备上做了类似说明。

Minisforum UH125 Pro 的外部连接(来源:Minisforum)
Minisforum UH125 Pro 的外部连接(来源:Minisforum)

SD 读卡器

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Khadas Mind
Intel Core i7-1360P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
181.79 MB/s +593%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
176.8 MB/s +574%
Geekom Mini IT13
Intel Core i9-13900H
154.449 MB/s +489%
Geekom Mini IT12
Intel Core i7-1260P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
129.2 MB/s +393%
Average of class Mini PC
  (15.1 - 214, n=26, last 2 years)
97.7 MB/s +273%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
65 MB/s +148%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
26.22 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Khadas Mind
Intel Core i7-1360P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
200.48 MB/s +708%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
182.5 MB/s +636%
Geekom Mini IT13
Intel Core i9-13900H
180.4 MB/s +627%
Geekom Mini IT12
Intel Core i7-1260P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
176.8 MB/s +613%
Average of class Mini PC
  (18.2 - 221, n=26, last 2 years)
112.4 MB/s +353%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
69.9 MB/s +182%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
24.8 MB/s

交流

Minisforum UH125 Pro 中的 WLAN 模块
Minisforum UH125 Pro 中的 WLAN 模块

Minisforum UH125 Pro 配备了英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E-AX210 无线模块,可确保无线网络通信。WLAN 模块可在 2.4 GHz、5 GHz 和 6 GHz 频率范围内工作。测试表明,在某些应用场景中,性能差异非常明显。如果需要传输大量数据,我们主要建议使用速度更快的 6 GHz 无线网络。不过,速度稍慢的 5 GHz 无线网络也完全可以满足日常使用的需要。相比之下,Minisforum UH125 Pro 是最优秀的产品之一。我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器进行了无线局域网测试。除了无线连接,Minisforum UH125 Pro 还有两个 LAN 插座。两个网络连接的数据传输速率最高可达 5 GBit/s。这使我们的测试样品在众多产品中脱颖而出。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1755 (1737min - 1766max) MBit/s
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1583 (1557min - 1611max) MBit/s -10%
Geekom AE7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1528 (1495min - 1552max) MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (885 - 1827, n=23)
1478 MBit/s -16%
Average of class Mini PC
  (684 - 1771, n=55, last 2 years)
1380 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Geekom AE7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1699 (1590min - 1792max) MBit/s +6%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1605 (1238min - 1652max) MBit/s
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1429 (1392min - 1511max) MBit/s -11%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (712 - 1615, n=22)
1338 MBit/s -17%
Average of class Mini PC
  (394 - 1800, n=55, last 2 years)
1330 MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1398 (1261min - 1453max) MBit/s +49%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (715 - 1711, n=25)
1202 MBit/s +28%
Average of class Mini PC
  (320 - 1796, n=113, last 2 years)
945 MBit/s +1%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
936 (907min - 946max) MBit/s
Aoostar GEM12
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
740 (676min - 758max) MBit/s -21%
Geekom AE7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
707 (631min - 811max) MBit/s -24%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
MediaTek MT7921
503 (371min - 687max) MBit/s -46%
Acemagic AM18
Realtek RTL8852BE
455 (221min - 519max) MBit/s -51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1146 (846min - 1308max) MBit/s +51%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (565 - 1670, n=25)
1086 MBit/s +43%
Average of class Mini PC
  (184.1 - 1776, n=113, last 2 years)
874 MBit/s +15%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
758 (727min - 793max) MBit/s
Aoostar GEM12
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
736 (369min - 756max) MBit/s -3%
Acemagic AM18
Realtek RTL8852BE
665 (343min - 743max) MBit/s -12%
Geekom AE7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
573 (145min - 972max) MBit/s -24%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
MediaTek MT7921
531 (255min - 725max) MBit/s -30%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1605 (1238-1652)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1755 (1737-1766)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø935 (907-946)
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø739 (676-758)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø758 (727-793)
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø724 (369-756)

配件

供货范围包括该设备和一个 120 瓦的紧凑型电源装置。还包括一个 VESA 安装板和安装材料。此外,还包括快速入门指南、HDMI 电缆和电源线。

Minisforum UH125 Pro 的供货范围
Minisforum UH125 Pro 的供货范围

维护

如果订购的是裸机版本的 Minisforum UH125 Pro,则不可避免地需要打开设备安装内存和固态硬盘。原则上讲,这样做效果相对较好,不过底部的胶粘橡胶脚垫有点碍事。它们隐藏了将底部固定在外壳上的四颗螺丝。不过,打开机箱时要小心,因为下部的两个 USB 端口是通过一条相对较短的带状电缆连接到内部的。为了访问内存和固态硬盘,必须拆下风扇。为此必须拧下 12 颗螺丝。Minisforum UH125 Pro 的内部结构类似于 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti.两个 M.2 接口隐藏在坚固的金属散热器下。在我们的测试设备中,一个 80 毫米长的固态硬盘已经占用了其中一个接口。内存可安装两个 SO-DIMM 模块。WLAN 模块也可以更换。不过,这要复杂得多,因为必须拆卸整个电路板。

带有开放式底部的 Minisforum UH125 Pro
胶合橡胶脚垫盖住螺丝
不带风扇的 Minisforum UH125 Pro
不带风扇的 Minisforum UH125 Pro
拆卸风扇
Minisforum UH125 Pro 电路板的顶面
Minisforum UH125 Pro 的各个部件

可持续性

Minisforum UH125 Pro 包装在一个与设备尺寸相称的纸箱中。附件分别装在不同的塑料袋中,在可持续发展方面还有待改进。如前所述,设备本身由铝和塑料混合制成。我们不知道是否使用了特殊工艺来生产回收材料。

性能 - Intel Core Ultra 5 性能良好

英特尔酷睿至强 5 125H 是一款可靠的中端 SoC,属于英特尔的 Meteor Lake 系列。总的来说,这款 SoC 提供了许多原生计算内核,非常适合多线程应用。iGPU 也随 Meteor Lake 系列进行了改版,基于 Arc 架构,与之前系列过时的 Xe iGPU 相比,性能明显提升。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO

测试条件

我们在平衡能源模式下进行了所有性能测试。我们没有改变 SoC 的性能,而是根据 BIOS 设置将其保留在默认状态(平衡)。除了平衡模式,SoC 还可以在静音和性能模式下运行。风扇曲线也是如此,我们没有进一步更改。我们将在稍后的测试中仔细查看各种风扇曲线的不同噪音水平。

功率限制 1 功率限制 2
静音模式 45 W 54 W
平衡模式 54 W 60 W
性能模式 65 瓦 65 瓦

处理器

Minisforum UH125 Pro 配备了 英特尔酷睿 5 125H.该 SoC 结合了 6 个 P 核和 8 个 E 核,可并行处理总共 18 个线程。基本上,这款处理器性能稳定,偶尔这款中端 SoC 甚至可以与酷睿 i9 机型相媲美。在整体性能对比中,我们的测试设备在 CPU 性能方面只能屈居末位。不过,我们不应被这一结果所蒙蔽,因为 Minisforum 在这里并没有使用 Meteor Lake 系列的顶级型号。与 Geekom AE7的差距相对较小,在性能评级中仅占 13 个百分点。

有关进一步的比较和基准,请参阅我们的 CPU 对比表.

Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024
Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
57.6 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
57 pt
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
56.9 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
55.5 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
54.1 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
50.5 pt
Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
946 Points +16%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
933 Points +15%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
923 Points +13%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
814 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
746 Points -8%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
703 Points -14%
CPU Single Core
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
114 Points +18%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
108 Points +11%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
107 Points +10%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
104 Points +7%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
104 Points +7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
97 Points
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
16130 Points +11%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
16099 Points +11%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
15979 Points +10%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
14659 Points +1%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
14564 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13015 Points -11%
Single Core
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1901 Points +16%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1788 Points +9%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1783 Points +9%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1737 Points +6%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1715 Points +5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1640 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
281 Points +20%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
279 Points +19%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
274 Points +17%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
270 Points +15%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
245 Points +4%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
235 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2544 Points +13%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2537 Points +13%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2505 Points +12%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2260 Points +1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2249 Points 0%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2245 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
734 Points +17%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
700 Points +11%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
691 Points +10%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
673 Points +7%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
659 Points +5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
629 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6346 Points +13%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6321 Points +13%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6250 Points +11%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5691 Points +1%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5618 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
5013 Points -11%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
3.38 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
3.32 Points +16%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
3.29 Points +15%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
3.26 Points +14%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2.98 Points +4%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2.86 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
30.49 Points +13%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
29.76 Points +10%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
29.7 Points +10%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
27.48 Points +2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
27.25 Points +1%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
27.02 Points
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
15303 Points +19%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
14232 Points +11%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
14163 Points +10%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
14015 Points +9%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13820 Points +7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
12858 Points
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
87296 Points +11%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
85872 Points +9%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
83726 Points +6%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
79014 Points 0%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
78817 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
75947 Points -4%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
262 Seconds * -14%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
234 Seconds * -2%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
230 Seconds *
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
202 Seconds * +12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
197 Seconds * +14%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
197 Seconds * +14%
wPrime 2.10
32m
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
4.48 s *
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
3.518 s * +21%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
3.454 s * +23%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2.703 s * +40%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2.699 s * +40%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2.658 s * +41%
1024m
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
412.775 s * -67%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
246.982 s *
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
186.394 s * +25%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
98.896 s * +60%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
96.95 s * +61%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
71.922 s * +71%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
317.5 (292min - 319max) fps +4%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
304.5 (304min - 306max) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
300.5 (288min - 319max) fps -1%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
289 (286min - 292max) fps -5%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
288 (287min - 289max) fps -5%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
281.5 (277min - 286max) fps -8%
Pass 2
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
144.15 (143.5min - 146.6max) fps +8%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
144.1 (143.9min - 145.6max) fps +8%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
143.7 (143min - 145.2max) fps +7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
134 (133.7min - 134.5max) fps
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
125.05 (112.4min - 132max) fps -7%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
113.95 (106.5min - 136.6max) fps -15%
WinRAR - Result
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
8735 KB/s +56%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7580 KB/s +36%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
7327 KB/s +31%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
6800 KB/s +22%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6428 KB/s +15%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5594 KB/s
TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
15.2 GB/s +69%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
14.7 GB/s +63%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
14.4 GB/s +60%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13.2 GB/s +47%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13 GB/s +44%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
9 GB/s
Twofish Mean 100MB
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2.4 GB/s +71%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2.2 GB/s +57%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2.1 GB/s +50%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2.1 GB/s +50%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2 GB/s +43%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1.4 GB/s
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1.4 GB/s +64%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1.3 GB/s +52%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1.3 GB/s +52%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1.2 GB/s +41%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1.2 GB/s +41%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
0.854 GB/s
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12228 Points +13%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12143 Points +13%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
12049 Points +12%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11283 Points +5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10788 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
10378 Points -4%
Single-Core
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1986 Points +25%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1958 Points +23%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1946 Points +22%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1866 Points +17%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1841 Points +16%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1593 Points
Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12141 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12086 Points +13%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
12019 Points +13%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11168 Points +5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10676 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
10276 Points -4%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1905 Points +19%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1900 Points +19%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1870 Points +17%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1810 Points +13%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1795 Points +12%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1596 Points
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
8125 Points +21%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8034 Points +19%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
7932 Points +18%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
7924 Points +18%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
7787 Points +16%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
6734 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
49341 Points +28%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47777 Points +24%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
47599 Points +23%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
41851 Points +8%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39510 Points +2%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
38648 Points
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
22786 Points +33%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
22237 Points +30%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
21762 Points +27%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18553 Points +8%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
18383 Points +7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
17138 Points
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
71631 MIPS
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
70733 MIPS
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
70723 MIPS
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
55620 MIPS
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
52479 MIPS
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
0 MIPS
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6661 MIPS +42%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6644 MIPS +41%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6545 MIPS +39%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
6321 MIPS +35%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6136 MIPS +31%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
4699 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
20.9 fps +25%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
20.5 fps +23%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
20.5 fps +23%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
16.7 fps
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
16.2 fps -3%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
14.1 fps -16%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
0.513 sec *
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4398 sec * +14%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4395 sec * +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4392 sec * +14%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4391 sec * +14%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4346 sec * +15%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
70.9 s *
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
53.7 s * +24%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
47.7 s * +33%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47.5 s * +33%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
39.4 s * +44%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
37.2 s * +48%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
323 Points +27%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
320 Points +26%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
304 Points +20%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
301 Points +19%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
300 Points +18%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
254 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
595 ms *
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
518 ms * +13%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
517 ms * +13%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
517 ms * +13%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
510 ms * +14%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
499 ms * +16%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
27120 Points +27%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
26617 Points +24%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
26194 Points +22%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
26093 Points +22%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
23626 Points +10%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
21391 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
11049 Points +20%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
10926 Points +19%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
10824 Points +18%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
10402 Points +13%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
9347 Points +2%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
9182 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
7.744 s *
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
7.445 s * +4%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
7.331 s * +5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
7.281 s * +6%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7.158 s * +8%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
7.112 s * +8%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
18.138 s * -7%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
17.904 s * -6%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
17.697 s * -4%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
16.967 s *
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
16.498 s * +3%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
16.234 s * +4%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
665.289 s * -57%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
655.388 s * -55%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
653.976 s * -54%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
423.565 s *
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
417.103 s * +2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
397.363 s * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
8948
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
15967 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
78817 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
12858 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15394
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
51581
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
2.52 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
23.68 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
95.61 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.86 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
27.02 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
95.42 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
235 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2245 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
132.66 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
629 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5618 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
14564 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1640 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
97 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
814 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
98.6 pt
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
96.3 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
92.2 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
64.5 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
60.8 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
58.1 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
57.5 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
26514 KRay/s +94%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
25916 KRay/s +90%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
25725 KRay/s +89%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
13639 KRay/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (646 - 51004, n=119, last 2 years)
12878 KRay/s -6%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
12389 KRay/s -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
11735 KRay/s -14%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
112419 Points +59%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
109747 Points +55%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
108506 Points +53%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
70880 Points
Average of class Mini PC
  (3857 - 214250, n=119, last 2 years)
64921 Points -8%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64350 Points -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
59094 Points -17%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
4898 MB/s +44%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
4769 MB/s +40%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
4695 MB/s +38%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
3404 MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3028 MB/s -11%
Average of class Mini PC
  (260 - 9399, n=119, last 2 years)
2856 MB/s -16%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2718 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
119250 Points +53%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
116083 Points +49%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
115133 Points +47%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
99851 Points +28%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
93952 Points +20%
Average of class Mini PC
  (8172 - 184747, n=119, last 2 years)
80187 Points +3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
78098 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
14976 Points +91%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
14876 Points +90%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
14590 Points +86%
Average of class Mini PC
  (408 - 29064, n=119, last 2 years)
8812 Points +12%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8417 Points +7%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8026 Points +2%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
7842 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
60098 Points +70%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
58597 Points +66%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
57881 Points +64%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
35321 Points
Average of class Mini PC
  (1987 - 113499, n=119, last 2 years)
33863 Points -4%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
31933 Points -10%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
29138 Points -18%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
167583 MB/s +157%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
163604 MB/s +151%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
112254 MB/s +72%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
102677 MB/s +57%
Average of class Mini PC
  (3691 - 325960, n=119, last 2 years)
88382 MB/s +35%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
85572 MB/s +31%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
65304 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
1048 MB/s +5%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
1042 MB/s +5%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
1015 MB/s +2%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
994 MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
870 MB/s -12%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
789 MB/s -21%
Average of class Mini PC
  (74.9 - 2039, n=119, last 2 years)
740 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
14162 KRay/s +96%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
13875 KRay/s +92%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
13617 KRay/s +89%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
7221 KRay/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (350 - 26952, n=119, last 2 years)
6881 KRay/s -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6325 KRay/s -12%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6205 KRay/s -14%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
45789 MPixel/s
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
40690 MPixel/s -11%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
40655 MPixel/s -11%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
40245 MPixel/s -12%
Average of class Mini PC
  (4408 - 50500, n=119, last 2 years)
28301 MPixel/s -38%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
28269 MPixel/s -38%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24903 MPixel/s -46%

Cinebench R15 多回路

总体而言,Minisforum UH125 Pro 在 Cinebench R15 连续循环测试中表现出色。仔细观察结果会发现,整个测试过程中会出现一些波动。不过,我们测试设备的平均成绩为 2,186 分,没有什么可隐瞒的。我们无法检测到性能的明显下降,例如 Geekom GT13 Pro.

Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标
Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标
0135270405540675810945108012151350148516201755189020252160229524302565Tooltip
Minisforum UH125 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H: Ø2186 (2040.4-2248.33)
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2530 (2503.13-2552.81)
Geekom AE7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2563 (2486.79-2630.54)
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1776 (1688.48-2326.12)
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø1981 (1895.47-2262.7)
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2489 (2476.93-2539.84)

系统性能

我们的测试样本在系统性能测试中的表现略好于纯 CPU 性能测试。我们的 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125H与所安装的 DDR5 内存相结合,在日常使用中表现出色。我们也可以主观地确认整个系统的高性能。我们的测试样品甚至在内存测试中名列前茅。

PCMark 10 / Score
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
7651 Points +24%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
7520 Points +21%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
7431 Points +20%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
6435 Points +4%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
6194 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
5944 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
11591 Points +23%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
11097 Points +18%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
11058 Points +17%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10822 Points +15%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
10347 Points +10%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
9427 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
10970 Points +42%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
10717 Points +39%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10482 Points +36%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
7924 Points +3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
7715 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
7319 Points -5%
CrossMark / Overall
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
1986 Points +30%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1939 Points +26%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
1828 Points +19%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
1813 Points +18%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1766 Points +15%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1533 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
2205 Points +66%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1849 Points +39%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1790 Points +34%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
1541 Points +16%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
1527 Points +15%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1332 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2040 Points +21%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
2030 Points +21%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
2011 Points +19%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
1907 Points +13%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1789 Points +6%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1683 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
1996 Points +36%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1872 Points +28%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
1743 Points +19%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1736 Points +19%
Geekom AE7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
1731 Points +18%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1463 Points
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
69592 MB/s
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
68449 MB/s -2%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
68299 MB/s -2%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
67777 MB/s -3%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6481 - 89287, n=119, last 2 years)
48357 MB/s -31%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45721 MB/s -34%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44442 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
72711 MB/s
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
61836 MB/s -15%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
61463 MB/s -15%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
61006 MB/s -16%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6914 - 99171, n=119, last 2 years)
49177 MB/s -32%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
47960 MB/s -34%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45995 MB/s -37%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
87118 MB/s +22%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
86677 MB/s +21%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
86273 MB/s +21%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
71514 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (6862 - 98583, n=119, last 2 years)
52856 MB/s -26%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45952 MB/s -36%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45733 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
184.8 ns *
Average of class Mini PC
  (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, last 2 years)
92.1 ns * +50%
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
90 ns * +51%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
88.6 ns * +52%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
87.9 ns * +52%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
79.9 ns * +57%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
75.8 ns * +59%

* ... smaller is better

NPU 性能

英特尔 英特尔酷睿至强 5 125H内含神经处理单元,可大大减轻 SoC 在人工智能应用方面的负载。我们使用 UL Procyon AI Interface 基准程序来评估其性能。与竞争对手相比,Minisforum UH125 Pro 的人工智能性能略胜一筹。与 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti.在后一项测试中,我们已经多次重复了基准测试,但结果没有任何变化。

UL Procyon for Windows
Overall Score Integer NPU
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
501 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
499 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
493 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
368 Points -27%
Overall Score Integer GPU
Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, Arc A770
1500 Points +174%
Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, Arc A750
1433 Points +162%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
684 Points +25%
Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673
Intel Core i7-12650H, A730M
597 Points +9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
547 Points
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
541 Points -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
526 Points -4%

DPC 延迟

在我们的 DPC 延迟测量中,Minisforum UH125 Pro 也只能排在中游。我们已经记录了上网时略微增加的延迟。播放 4K 测试视频时,延迟再次略有增加。不过,我们没有记录到任何丢帧现象,这是非常好的。

打开多个浏览器标签页时的最大延迟
打开多个浏览器标签页时的最大延迟
播放 4K 视频材料时的最大延迟
播放 4K 视频材料时的最大延迟
Prime95 十秒后的最大延迟时间
Prime95 十秒后的最大延迟时间
按最长执行时间排列的驱动程序
按最长执行时间排列的驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Geekom AE7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
2198.8 μs * -53%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
1533.4 μs * -7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1438 μs *
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
1026 μs * +29%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1001.9 μs * +30%
Acemagic AM18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
900 μs * +37%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

如果 Minisforum UH125 Pro 不是作为裸机购买的,那么设备中就有一个 1 TB SSD。在我们的案例中,它是来自金士顿的型号。就性能而言,我们本希望安装的固态硬盘能有更高的性能。遗憾的是,与竞争对手相比,它只能排在中下游。固态硬盘的运行速度为 PCIe 4.0 x4,这正是 M.2 接口的最佳性能。我们在维护部分已经提到了大型固态硬盘冷却器。它可以在负载情况下很好地冷却固态硬盘,因此在较长的负载情况下也不会出现性能损失。除了已安装的 M.2 2280 固态硬盘外,Minisforum UH125 Pro 还可以安装另一块固态硬盘。不过,必须确保固态硬盘的长度为 30 毫米。两个固态硬盘都会被散热器覆盖,而且已安装的散热垫足够大,可以覆盖两个固态硬盘。

有关进一步的比较和基准,请参阅我们的 比较表.

AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
CDM 3
CDM 3
CDM 5
CDM 5
CDM 6
CDM 6
CDI
CDI
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
Sequential Read: 2329 MB/s
Sequential Write: 3323 MB/s
512K Read: 1465 MB/s
512K Write: 2486 MB/s
4K Read: 51.02 MB/s
4K Write: 138.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 366.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 318.2 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
87.6 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
82.5 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
75.7 pt
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
61.1 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
49.7 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
46.5 pt
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
43.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4357 (4314.26min - 4356.72max) MB/s +85%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3108 (3065.99min - 3107.56max) MB/s +32%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
2668 (2648.91min - 2668.42max) MB/s +13%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
2411 (2346.63min - 2410.89max) MB/s +3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2351 (2320.68min - 2350.61max) MB/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (277 - 4357, n=119, last 2 years)
2333 MB/s -1%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
2279 (2272.33min - 2279.03max) MB/s -3%
seq write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4619 (4584.79min - 4619.39max) MB/s +39%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4544 (4380.79min - 4543.83max) MB/s +36%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
3866 (206.78min - 3865.71max) MB/s +16%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
3650 (3239.07min - 3649.71max) MB/s +10%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3331 (3244.92min - 3330.75max) MB/s
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
2629 (1414.22min - 2628.56max) MB/s -21%
Average of class Mini PC
  (229 - 5595, n=119, last 2 years)
2509 MB/s -25%
seq q8 t1 read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
7007 (6166.72min - 7006.62max) MB/s +46%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
5213 (4500.71min - 5212.95max) MB/s +9%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
4939 (4360.49min - 4938.56max) MB/s +3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
4802 (4169.19min - 4801.68max) MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
4780 (4492.97min - 4780.46max) MB/s 0%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
4684 (4089.86min - 4684.2max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Mini PC
  (236 - 8430, n=119, last 2 years)
3790 MB/s -21%
seq q8 t1 write
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
5261 (5018.9min - 5261.3max) MB/s +35%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4754 (4738.27min - 4754.03max) MB/s +22%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
4273 (4238.26min - 4272.58max) MB/s +10%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3902 (3839.68min - 3901.75max) MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
3901 (912.47min - 3901.29max) MB/s 0%
Average of class Mini PC
  (239 - 6669, n=119, last 2 years)
2810 MB/s -28%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
2627 (2402.52min - 2626.88max) MB/s -33%
4k q1 t1 read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
85.3 (82.57min - 85.32max) MB/s +42%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
80.9 (78.95min - 80.85max) MB/s +35%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
78.7 (78.09min - 78.69max) MB/s +31%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
60 (58.44min - 60.02max) MB/s
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
55.6 (53.92min - 55.58max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6.85 - 86.6, n=119, last 2 years)
55.3 MB/s -8%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
48.1 (43.1min - 48.11max) MB/s -20%
4k q1 t1 write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
422 (409.3min - 421.98max) MB/s +208%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
327 (306.06min - 326.78max) MB/s +139%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
274 (271.38min - 273.89max) MB/s +100%
Average of class Mini PC
  (30.4 - 435, n=119, last 2 years)
196.9 MB/s +44%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
184.8 (177.47min - 184.84max) MB/s +35%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
151.3 (148.71min - 151.28max) MB/s +11%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
136.8 (131.56min - 136.81max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
3593 (3380.17min - 3593.41max) MB/s +415%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3197 (3174.44min - 3196.85max) MB/s +358%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
2967 (2962.7min - 2967.4max) MB/s +325%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
1580 (1549.8min - 1579.65max) MB/s +126%
Average of class Mini PC
  (26.1 - 4158, n=119, last 2 years)
1411 MB/s +102%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
910 (889.36min - 909.64max) MB/s +30%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
698 (691.89min - 697.84max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3639 (3534.46min - 3639.09max) MB/s +1070%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
3364 (866.38min - 3364.31max) MB/s +982%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
1583 (825.5min - 1583.41max) MB/s +409%
Average of class Mini PC
  (32.6 - 4288, n=119, last 2 years)
1332 MB/s +328%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
762 (700.88min - 761.76max) MB/s +145%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
627 (618.33min - 627.08max) MB/s +102%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
311 (252.72min - 310.91max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10021 Points +158%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
7931 Points +105%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
6798 Points +75%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
6354 Points +64%
Average of class Mini PC
  (211 - 10021, n=117, last 2 years)
4244 Points +9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3878 Points
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
3435 Points -11%
Score Read
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3741 Points +241%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
2899 Points +165%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2866 Points +161%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
1757 Points +60%
Average of class Mini PC
  (76 - 3741, n=117, last 2 years)
1578 Points +44%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
1248 Points +14%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1096 Points
Score Write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4371 Points +90%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
3759 Points +63%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
3564 Points +55%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2516 Points +9%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2306 Points
Average of class Mini PC
  (88 - 4371, n=117, last 2 years)
1902 Points -18%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
1600 Points -31%
Seq Read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4546 MB/s +19%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4317 MB/s +13%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
4162 MB/s +9%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
3891 MB/s +2%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
3835 MB/s +1%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3808 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (291 - 6620, n=117, last 2 years)
3231 MB/s -15%
Seq Write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4188 MB/s +134%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
3477 MB/s +95%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
3374 MB/s +89%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
2568 MB/s +44%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
2526 MB/s +41%
Average of class Mini PC
  (242 - 5783, n=117, last 2 years)
2292 MB/s +28%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1787 MB/s
4K Read
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
104.3 MB/s +82%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
89.3 MB/s +56%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
83.4 MB/s +46%
Average of class Mini PC
  (21.4 - 104.3, n=117, last 2 years)
59.7 MB/s +4%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
57.3 MB/s
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
55.2 MB/s -4%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
52.4 MB/s -9%
4K Write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
366 MB/s +101%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
296 MB/s +63%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
221 MB/s +21%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
195.5 MB/s +7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
182.1 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (30.9 - 366, n=117, last 2 years)
177.5 MB/s -3%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
139.4 MB/s -23%
4K-64 Read
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3220 MB/s +389%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
2379 MB/s +262%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2328 MB/s +254%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
1313 MB/s +100%
Average of class Mini PC
  (23.4 - 3220, n=117, last 2 years)
1195 MB/s +82%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
812 MB/s +23%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
658 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3731 MB/s +92%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
3311 MB/s +70%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
2850 MB/s +47%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1945 MB/s
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
1883 MB/s -3%
Average of class Mini PC
  (32.8 - 3731, n=117, last 2 years)
1495 MB/s -23%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
1204 MB/s -38%
Access Time Read
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
0.173 ms * -71%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
0.127 ms * -26%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
0.101 ms *
Average of class Mini PC
  (0.022 - 0.489, n=117, last 2 years)
0.09579 ms * +5%
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
0.077 ms * +24%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.076 ms * +25%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
0.044 ms * +56%
Access Time Write
Average of class Mini PC
  (0.014 - 0.765, n=117, last 2 years)
0.1133 ms * -372%
Acemagic AM18
Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
0.078 ms * -225%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
0.059 ms * -146%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
0.031 ms * -29%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
0.024 ms *
Geekom AE7
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
0.023 ms * +4%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.017 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Minisforum UH125 Pro Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4790 (4223.81-4803.95)
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5121 (4152.57-5218.34)
Geekom AE7 Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4932 (4634.29-4944.25)
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5377 (3710.83-7006.62)
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4764 (3862.99-4794.3)
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4663 (3995.26-4684.2)

图形卡 - Intel Arc 7 核 iGPU

由于采用了英特尔 Arc 架构,Minisforum UH125 Pro 的 iGPU 性能明显高于配备 96 个 EU 的英特尔 Iris Xe G7。不过,英特尔 Arc 7 核 iGPU 的性能与 AMD Radeon 780M 的出色性能相比,还是相形见绌。只有最高型号的英特尔 Arc 8 核 iGPU 才能在一定程度上缩小差距。英特尔 iGPU 可以完美地应对 Affinity Photo 2。 我们已经在几款基于新英特尔 iGPU 的测试设备上观察到了这一点。

更多比较和基准测试请参见我们的 GPU 对照表.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
100 pt
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
98.5 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
95.9 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
84.1 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
59.8 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
56 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
13824 Points +34%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
13636 Points +32%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
13410 Points +30%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10303 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
7424 Points -28%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
6999 Points -32%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2970 Points +6%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2912 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2846 Points +2%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2796 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1690 Points -40%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
1583 Points -43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
8437 Points +20%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
8327 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8007 Points +14%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
7047 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
5812 Points -18%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
5407 Points -23%
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
34.6 fps +17%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
34 fps +15%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
33.2 fps +12%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
29.6 fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
25.1 fps -15%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
22.3 fps -25%
Extreme Preset DX11
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
36.3 fps +15%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
36.1 fps +15%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
35.3 fps +12%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
31.5 fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
26 fps -17%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
23.2 fps -26%
Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
24.5 fps +45%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
24.5 fps +45%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
24 fps +42%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
16.9 fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
15.1 fps -11%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
13.7 fps -19%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
21 fps +15%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
20.8 fps +14%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
19.2 fps +5%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
18.3 fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
15.7 fps -14%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
14.6 fps -20%
Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12174 Points +21%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12146 Points +21%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
11903 Points +19%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10026 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
6619 Points -34%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
6129 Points -39%
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
3698 Points +21%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
3631 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
3592 Points +17%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
3066 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
2306 Points -25%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
2113 Points -31%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1803 Points +7%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1777 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1737 Points +3%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1686 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1124 Points -33%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
1060 Points -37%
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
9863 Points +76%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
9806 Points +75%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
9494 Points +69%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5613 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
3650 Points -35%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
3382 Points -40%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
483 Points +3%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
481 Points +2%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
471 Points 0%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
471 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
286 Points -39%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
226 Points -52%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
486 Points +11%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
486 Points +11%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
481 Points +10%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
439 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
294 Points -33%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
239 Points -46%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2589 Points +79%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2560 Points +77%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2477 Points +71%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1447 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
873 Points -40%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
850 Points -41%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2651 Points +138%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2614 Points +135%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2519 Points +127%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
1112 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
888 Points -20%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
866 Points -22%
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
3667 Points +71%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
3665 Points +71%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
3535 Points +65%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2143 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1310 Points -39%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
1201 Points -44%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1025 Samples/s +44%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
808 Samples/s +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
801 Samples/s +13%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
710 Samples/s
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
651 Samples/s -8%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
577 Samples/s -19%
Sala GPUs-only
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2517 Samples/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
2349 Samples/s -7%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2312 Samples/s -8%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
2104 Samples/s -16%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1512 Samples/s -40%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1496 Samples/s -41%
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5244 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
4460 Points -15%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
4215 Points -20%
Geekom AE7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1889 Points -64%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1709 Points -67%
Acemagic AM18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1371 Points -74%
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
Ultra 5 125H
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M
R7 8845HS
Geekom AE7, AMD Radeon 780M
R9 7940HS
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
i9-13900H
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
i9-12900HK
Acemagic AM18, AMD Radeon 780M
R7 7840HS
Average of class Mini PC
 
SPECviewperf 2020
291%
263%
-11%
-13%
264%
173%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
4.8
11.2
133%
12.7
165%
2.69
-44%
3.48
-27%
13
171%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
3.38
19.9
489%
14.4
326%
3.17
-6%
3
-11%
14.2
320%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
15.4
33.4
117%
30.2
96%
16.3
6%
15.1
-2%
31.2
103%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
9.7
23.2
139%
23.7
144%
8.53
-12%
8.08
-17%
24.7
155%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
13.2
20.4
55%
20.7
57%
10.3
-22%
9.78
-26%
20.7
57%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
5.54
64.1
1057%
61.3
1006%
6.62
19%
6.67
20%
61.1
1003%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
32.8
47.7
45%
47.4
45%
27.3
-17%
24.4
-26%
46.7
42%
3DMark 05 Standard
41203 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score
39957 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
36043 points
3DMark 11 Performance
10634 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
125884 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29186 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6548 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
3351 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3121 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
598 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
2436 points
Help

游戏性能

Minisforum UH125 Pro 只能在有限的范围内享受游戏带来的乐趣。虽然现在 iGPU 的性能明显优于英特尔 Iris Xe G7 iGPU,但你必须接受一些重大的妥协。不过,英特尔 Arc-7 iGPU 在某些游戏中表现出色:即使是新的《F1 24》也能提供出人意料的帧率,从而带来流畅的游戏体验。不过,我们目前还不能对游戏的适用性作出一概而论。要对英特尔 Arc-7 iGPU 的性能进行更精确的分类,请参考我们的 GPU 游戏列表.

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom AE7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
168 (6.33min, 125P1) fps +27%
Acemagic AM18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
165.1 (4.54min, 100P1) fps +25%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
165.1 (4.83min, 125P1) fps +25%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
132.4 (4.93min, 90.9P1) fps
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
120.8 (22.9min, 83.3P1) fps -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
119.7 (7.51min, 66.7P1) fps -10%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Acemagic AM18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
66.7 (4.68min, 45.5P1) fps +71%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
65.3 (4.57min, 45.5P1) fps +68%
Geekom AE7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
65.1 (2.93min, 29.4P1) fps +67%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
38.9 (3.15min, 28.6P1) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
22 (6.3min, 16.4P1) fps -43%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
20.3 (10.5min, 16.1P1) fps -48%
Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Acemagic AM18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
163.1 (143min) fps +71%
Geekom AE7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
163 (143.1min) fps +71%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
152.7 (134.2min) fps +60%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
119.5 (88.5min) fps +25%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
109.8 (85min) fps +15%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
95.5 (63.7min) fps
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Geekom AE7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
89.8 (75.7min) fps +22%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
86.6 (72.2min) fps +18%
Acemagic AM18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
82.9 (69.1min) fps +13%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
73.6 (47.5min) fps
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
67 (60.7min) fps -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
65.5 (56.1min) fps -11%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Acemagic AM18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
45.4 (38.4min) fps +54%
Geekom AE7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
45 (38min) fps +53%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
42.4 (35.7min) fps +44%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
29.5 (25.4min) fps
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
18.2 (14.1min) fps -38%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
18.2 (14.7min) fps -38%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Acemagic AM18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
27.8 (23.7min) fps +35%
Geekom AE7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
27.4 (23.1min) fps +33%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
26.3 (22.2min) fps +28%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
20.6 (17.9min) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
12.8 (10.9min) fps -38%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
12.2 (10.3min) fps -41%
Baldur's Gate 3
1280x720 Low Preset
Geekom AE7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
67.4 (22.7min, 28.3P0.1, 43.6P1) fps +50%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
60.3 (21.3min, 36P0.1, 46.1P1) fps +34%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
45 (14.9min, 19.4P0.1, 29P1) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
26.2 (4.4min, 7.02P0.1, 18.4P1) fps -42%
1920x1080 High Preset
Geekom AE7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
25.7 (11min, 11.5P0.1, 14.5P1) fps +32%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
24.7 (16.6min, 17.1P0.1, 19.4P1) fps +27%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
19.5 (9.2min, 10.4P0.1, 12.7P1) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
11.7 (3.43min, 3.51P0.1, 3.99P1) fps -40%
F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
94.8 (81min, 64P1) fps +47%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
64.3 (55min, 53P1) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
40.4 (34min, 33P1) fps -37%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
59.5 (50min, 41P1) fps +43%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
41.7 (34min, 34P1) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
25.6 (22min, 21P1) fps -39%

FPS chart

05101520Tooltip
Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core: Ø17 (16.3-17.7)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.7 (20.1-23.3)
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M: Ø22.4 (19.7-23.7)
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø11.1 (5.97-12.3)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 132.4 143.3 38.9 15.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 95.5 77.8 73.6 70.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 58.3 32.9 23.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 52.2 40.3 33.4
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 29.9 23.2 19.5 19.5
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 29.5 24.3 20.6 18.8
F1 24 (2024) 64.3 56.6 41.7 11.4

Minisforum UH125 Pro 搭配 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Minisforum UH125 Pro 可以毫无问题地与外部显卡一起使用。3D 加速器可通过 USB4 或 OCuLink 与设备连接。在不影响总体评分的情况下,我们使用 Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 进行了一些测试。基本上,这种组合可以明显提高 3D 性能。与竞争对手相比,Minisforum UH125 Pro 不得不退居二线,我们也使用相同的外置 GPU 解决方案对其进行了测试。单核性能略低于 英特尔酷睿 5 125H的单核性能略低于对比设备,这在低分辨率下非常明显。尽管如此,Minisforum UH125 Pro 仍能在此配置下处理大多数现代游戏,而无需牺牲太多细节。

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
99.1 pt
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
99 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
98 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
94.9 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
34666 Points +236%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
34034 Points +230%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
33219 Points +222%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
32085 Points +211%

10303 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
11182 Points +300%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
11156 Points +299%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
11085 Points +296%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10935 Points +291%

2796 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
25842 Points +267%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
25468 Points +261%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
25462 Points +261%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
24809 Points +252%

7047 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
7139 Points +339%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7079 Points +335%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
7044 Points +333%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
6997 Points +330%

1628 Points
Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
34726 Points +246%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
34168 Points +241%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
33894 Points +238%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
25121 Points +151%

10026 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
15240 Points +397%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
15076 Points +392%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
15008 Points +389%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
14859 Points +385%

3066 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
7193 Points +327%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
7064 Points +319%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
7055 Points +318%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7029 Points +317%

1686 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
9419 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
9205 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
9188 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
9149 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
4079 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
4016 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
4013 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
4009 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
143.9 fps +751%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
141.6 fps +738%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
140.6 fps +732%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
135.9 fps +704%

16.9 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
138.6 fps +657%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
137.5 fps +651%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
137 fps +649%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
133.5 fps +630%

18.3 fps
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
174.9 fps +491%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
174.5 fps +490%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
173.6 fps +486%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
172.3 fps +482%

29.6 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
163.6 fps +419%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
163.2 fps +418%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
162 fps +414%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
158.8 fps +404%

31.5 fps
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
28156 Points +402%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
28076 Points +400%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
27929 Points +398%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
27669 Points +393%

5613 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2719 Points +477%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2715 Points +476%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2708 Points +475%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
2687 Points +470%

471 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2663 Points +507%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2657 Points +505%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2641 Points +502%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
2622 Points +497%

439 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
5769 Points +299%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
5760 Points +298%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
5742 Points +297%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5652 Points +291%

1447 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6335 Points +470%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6319 Points +468%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
6283 Points +465%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
6223 Points +460%

1112 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
10671 Points +398%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
10626 Points +396%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
10594 Points +394%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10445 Points +387%

2143 Points
Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
100.6 Points +11%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
98.3 Points +8%

90.9 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
81.6 Points -10%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
81.2 Points -11%
Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
55.8 Points +234%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
55.8 Points +234%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
48 Points +187%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
47.9 Points +187%

16.7 Points
Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
98.8 pt
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
98.7 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
93.6 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
87.6 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
106 (82.3min) fps +133%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
101.4 (78.7min) fps +123%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
84.9 (65.5min) fps +87%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
70.2 (53.5min) fps +54%

45.5 (38.7min) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
81.5 (64.7min) fps +235%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
81.2 (65.1min) fps +234%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
80.4 (63.9min) fps +231%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
72.2 (55.8min) fps +197%

24.3 (21.3min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
64.5 (50.7min) fps +243%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
63.9 (49.4min) fps +240%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
63.5 (50.1min) fps +238%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
60.8 (43.6min) fps +223%

18.8 (16.2min) fps
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
113.4 (62.4min, 69.4P0.1, 78.1P1) fps +279%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
110.4 (37.6min, 67.1P0.1, 77.2P1) fps +269%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
110.1 (57.6min, 68.5P0.1, 75.3P1) fps +268%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
109.5 (51.8min, 62.3P0.1, 74.4P1) fps +266%

29.9 (18.4min, 19P0.1, 20.6P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
90.8 (48.5min, 55.2P0.1, 61.7P1) fps +291%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
90.4 (50.6min, 54.8P0.1, 59.8P1) fps +290%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
88.5 (53.2min, 55.5P0.1, 59.9P1) fps +281%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
87.3 (36.9min, 43.6P0.1, 57.2P1) fps +276%

23.2 (14.2min, 14.4P0.1, 15.2P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
79 (45.4min, 46P0.1, 53.2P1) fps +305%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
78.3 (46.6min, 47.4P0.1, 51.3P1) fps +302%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
76.8 (44.1min, 46.7P0.1, 49.8P1) fps +294%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
76.3 (41.3min, 43.7P0.1, 50P1) fps +291%

19.5 (11.2min, 12.1P0.1, 13.2P1) fps
F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
88.2 (48min, 52P1) fps +37%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
88.1 (48min, 49P1) fps +37%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
77.3 (42min, 43P1) fps +20%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
72.6 (41min, 43P1) fps +13%

64.3 (55min, 53P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
84.5 (47min, 49P1) fps +49%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
82.2 (47min, 49P1) fps +45%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
72.8 (41min, 41P1) fps +29%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
70 (41min, 42P1) fps +24%

56.6 (48min, 47P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
46.4 (27min, 26P1) fps +307%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
46.1 (27min, 27P1) fps +304%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
42 (24min, 25P1) fps +268%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
39.5 (22min, 23P1) fps +246%

11.4 (8min, 8P1) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
Ultra 5 125H
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
Ultra 5 125H
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
R9 7940HS
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
R9 8945HS
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
i9-13900H
Average of class Mini PC
 
SPECviewperf 2020
148%
336%
450%
330%
173%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
4.8
10.9
127%
13
171%
10.8
125%
10.8
125%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
3.38
17.8
427%
20.9
518%
50.3
1388%
21
521%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
15.4
26.6
73%
76.8
399%
76.6
397%
76.4
396%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
9.7
23.6
143%
39.2
304%
38.8
300%
40.1
313%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
13.2
28.7
117%
46.5
252%
45.9
248%
47.3
258%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
32.8
47.5
45%
199
507%
195
495%
196
498%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
5.54
11.4
106%
16.6
200%
16.6
200%
16.5
198%
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 171.1 166.4 150.5 93.1 85.4 102.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 144.6 128 120.8 117.5 103.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 109.8 97.5 74.7 64
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 109.5 87.3 77.3 76.3 60 36.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 74.2 72.2 65.3 60.8 43.5 21.9
F1 24 (2024) 72.6 70 58.2 39.5 35 18.6

排放 - 无最佳风扇曲线

噪音排放

Minisforum UH125 Pro 在空转时的噪音排放并不明显。不过,我们记录的声压级为 35 dB(A)。我们在其他 Minisforum 设备上看到过更好的结果。在负载情况下,音量会增大,在峰值时,我们记录到清晰可闻的 43.9 dB(A)。这些数值是 UEFI 中预设风扇配置文件(平衡)的结果,也包含在总评分中,因为这是默认设置。我们还使用静音和高性能风扇配置文件进行了相同的测量。音量方面的差异是可以清楚测量和听到的。如果您想购买 Minisforum UH125 Pro,我们建议您在 UEFI 中激活静音配置文件。虽然 CPU 性能不受影响,但在所有情况下音量都会降低。

安静 平衡 性能
空闲 31.3 dB(A) 35 dB(A) 42.4 dB(A)
平均负载 36.9 dB(A) 42.2 dB(A) 45.1 dB(A)
最大负载 38.5 dB(A) 43.9 dB(A) 47.5 dB(A)
CP 2077 Ultra 36.5 dB(A) 40.8 dB(A) 46.4 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle
35 / 35 / 35 dB(A)
Load
42.2 / 43.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.942.237.839.538.840.22538.942.144.244.437.542.93140.441.939.939.938.938.84032.331.529.429.726.428.95038.337.535.437.330.835.76332.633.229.734.627.131.78023.724.623.523.321.322.810022.522.422.821.516.822.112524.521.620.721.313.92416024.322.520.719.711.722.120025.724.621.421.813.525.325027.225.522.422.41026.231528.425.620.521.48.626.24002723.92120.79.82650027.325.822.322.58.327.563030.829.12424.39.229.680030.628.523.323.49.629100030.328.423.323.510.928.6125032.430.424.724.41129.6160031.428.823.823.510.928.6200034.836.824.924.811.535.1250038.634.425.425.512.332.8315030.22823.623.613.327.5400029.427.423.323.513.927.2500026.823.919.319.414.124.2630022.318.815.815.714.62080001615.515.115.214.916.81000015.715.715.115.21516.21250015.115.314.91514.815.61600014.915.314.915.114.515.2SPL43.942.2353524.841.3N43.422.10.63.4median 27.2median 25.5median 22.3median 21.8median 12.3median 26.2Delta4.33.52.62.52.33.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMinisforum UH125 Pro
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
Geekom AE7
R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
Geekom GT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Acemagic AM18
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
Noise
15%
3%
5%
7%
4%
off / environment *
24.8
24.3
2%
24.4
2%
24.3
2%
25.4
-2%
24.8
-0%
Idle Minimum *
35
27.5
21%
24.9
29%
27.9
20%
27.5
21%
31
11%
Idle Average *
35
27.6
21%
25
29%
27.9
20%
28
20%
31.2
11%
Idle Maximum *
35
27.6
21%
25
29%
28
20%
33
6%
31.4
10%
Load Average *
42.2
36
15%
52
-23%
43.8
-4%
42.8
-1%
37.1
12%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
40.8
35.4
13%
52
-27%
45.4
-11%
Load Maximum *
43.9
38.2
13%
51.4
-17%
48.5
-10%
44.9
-2%
53.7
-22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
35.4
44.5
37.6

* ... smaller is better

温度

Minisforum UH125 Pro 能出色地通过所有压力测试,从未出现过任何温度问题。金属外壳散热良好,始终保持低温。只有右侧风扇出口区域的温度略高。在压力测试中 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125H最高工作温度为 78 °C,但平均温度稳定在 73 °C。54 瓦的功率极限始终保持不变。

压力测试 Prime95,单人
压力测试 Prime95,单人
FurMark 压力测试,独奏
FurMark 压力测试,独奏
压力测试 Prime95 + FurMark
压力测试 Prime95 + FurMark
Minisforum UH125 Pro 压力测试(顶部)
Minisforum UH125 Pro 压力测试(顶部)
Minisforum UH125 Pro 压力测试(底部)
Minisforum UH125 Pro 压力测试(底部)
压力测试期间的 Minisforum UH125 Pro(右侧)
压力测试期间的 Minisforum UH125 Pro(右侧)
压力测试期间的供电装置
压力测试期间的供电装置
Max. Load
 31.9 °C30.1 °C30.6 °C 
 32.1 °C34.3 °C34.6 °C 
 30.2 °C29 °C32.1 °C 
Maximum: 34.6 °C
Average: 31.7 °C
33.7 °C31.8 °C27.6 °C
35.5 °C23.8 °C26.7 °C
34.1 °C28 °C28.5 °C
Maximum: 35.5 °C
Average: 30 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the class Mini PC.

耗电量

Minisforum UH125 Pro 的空闲功耗值之高令人惊讶: 11.9 至 15.4 瓦的功耗比我们在此比较过的大多数其他迷你 PC 都要高。在负载情况下,Minisforum UH125 Pro 的情况有所好转。我们的测量设备在平均负载下仅显示 48.3 瓦。我们看到的最大功率略低于 90 瓦,与竞争对手相比,这是一个明显更好的结果。不过,在效率方面,我们的测试设备并没有超过 Geekom AE7Geekom GT13 Pro的领先优势微乎其微。

我们已经熟悉了许多 Minisforum 迷你 PC 所配备的 120 瓦电源装置。在我们的测试中,电源从未出现过任何问题。如果你想在性能模式下以 65 瓦永久运行 SoC,你仍然有足够的储备。

Minisforum UH125 Pro 带电源装置(19 V;6.32 A)
Minisforum UH125 Pro 带电源装置(19 V;6.32 A)
供电装置(19 伏;6.32 安)
供电装置(19 伏;6.32 安)
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 1.5 / 6.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 11.9 / 14.6 / 15.4 Watt
Load midlight 48.3 / 89.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
Geekom AE7
R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
Geekom GT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Acemagic AM18
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
 
Average of class Mini PC
 
Power Consumption
-7%
10%
-2%
-15%
-6%
22%
1%
Idle Minimum *
11.9
8.2
31%
4.5
62%
7.9
34%
12.1
-2%
9.8
18%
6.88 ?(3 - 11.9, n=6)
42%
Idle Average *
14.6
10
32%
4.7
68%
10.3
29%
13.2
10%
11.5
21%
9.02 ?(6.3 - 14.6, n=6)
38%
Idle Maximum *
15.4
14.6
5%
8.1
47%
22.3
-45%
14.1
8%
15.3
1%
12.2 ?(6.5 - 16, n=6)
21%
Load Average *
48.3
73.9
-53%
81.8
-69%
57.44
-19%
82.9
-72%
75.3
-56%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
52.7
79.9
-52%
71.2
-35%
55.9
-6%
Load Maximum *
89.8
95.3
-6%
100.3
-12%
93.4
-4%
106.8
-19%
102.8
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Efficiency overview

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
100 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
84.5 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
83.8 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62.9 pt
Power Consumption
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
238 Points per Watt +31%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
210 Points per Watt +16%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
181.1 Points per Watt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
148.1 Points per Watt -18%
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
61.4 Points per Watt +8%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
57.1 Points per Watt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
54.3 Points per Watt -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
34.9 Points per Watt -39%
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor)
Geekom AE7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
33.2 Points per Watt +19%
Minisforum UH125 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
28 Points per Watt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24.8 Points per Watt -11%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
23.1 Points per Watt -17%

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø14.4 (13.7-16.8)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.28-14.3)
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.76 (3.61-8.11)
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø17.4 (12.6-22.4)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø79.6 (76-85.2)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø82.9 (81.3-87.6)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.4 (83.6-85.1)
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø86.2 (76.5-100.3)
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø60.2 (57-86.6)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø52.7 (51.9-55.2)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø79.9 (75.5-83.5)
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø71.2 (68.8-72.8)
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø55.9 (54.2-59.2)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø48.4 (45.1-51.5)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø73.9 (55.4-87)
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø81.8 (56.1-94.1)
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø57.4 (53.5-61.5)

Power consumption with external monitor

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83 (67.7-89.8)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.6 (80.7-95.3)
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø80.9 (76-99.5)
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø59.5 (53.5-84.7)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.3 (80-81.4)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82.1 (74.2-89.2)
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø76.7 (69.8-91.2)
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø91.2 (88.5-93.4)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø28.7 (27-62.8)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34 (31.1-57.1)
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø29.1 (24.9-62.9)
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.6 (29-59.5)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.4 (79.8-81.1)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.3 (72.3-87.5)
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø67.6 (64.1-85.2)
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø62.1 (50.4-89.7)
Minisforum UH125 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø48 (46.2-53.5)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø83.1 (79.2-88.5)
Geekom AE7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø86.1 (77.5-94.6)
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø54.6 (51.3-69.7)

Pros

+ 坚固外壳
+ 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125H,配备良好的 iGPU 和 NPU
+ 32 GB DDR5 内存(5,600 MT/秒)
+ 双 5 GBit LAN
+ 快速无线局域网
+ 强大的冷却装置(SoC 和 SSD)
+ 机箱温度低
+ 2x USB4、1x OCuLink

Cons

- SD读卡器速度慢
- Copilot 按钮没有提供附加值
- 送货时风扇声音明显
- 性价比

评语:不错的小型 PC,但略有不足

测试中的 Minisforum UH125 Pro:由 Minisforum 提供
测试中的 Minisforum UH125 Pro:由 Minisforum 提供

Minisforum UH125 Pro 是一款配备英特尔最新流星湖处理器的迷你电脑。到目前为止,Minisforum UH125 Pro 只配备了 英特尔酷睿 5 125H处理器,该处理器非常适合大多数任务。Minisforum UH125 Pro 的性能稳定,不会因安装的冷却装置温度过高而受到影响。

在设计方面,Minisforum 没有借鉴我们已经看到的产品组合,而是为 UH125 Pro 配备了新的机箱。在尺寸方面,这款微型电脑比其他微型电脑略大。尽管如此,该设备并不显得笨重,而且这种尺寸有利于散热装置,这一点我们绝对赞同。说到散热,这就是我们对 Minisforum UH125 Pro 的最大批评:预设风扇配置文件的设置不够理想。不过,它为降低风扇转速提供了足够的余地。在静音模式下,设备的噪音明显降低,而性能却没有任何损失。外部接口的选择非常出色。除了两个 USB4 端口外,还有一个 OCuLink 端口和两个用于网络连接的 5G 接口。这使 Minisforum UH125 Pro 有别于通常只有两个 2.5G 网络接口的普通产品。

Minisforum UH125 Pro 具备了成为一台真正优秀的微型电脑所需的一切条件。它的连接性非常完美,而且风扇曲线经过调整,即使在负载情况下也能保持安静。

Minisforum UH125 Pro 的性能一直不错,但并不突出。通过 UH125 Pro,Minisforum 创造了一款适用于各种用途的优秀迷你 PC,既可用于家庭办公,也可作为客厅的多媒体设备。在价格方面,你必须更加挑剔一些,因为如果我们将测试配置中该设备的零售价定为 879 欧元,那么我们就无法在此给出购买建议。目前 699 欧元的预购价格也是一笔不小的开支。A Minisforum UM790 Pro仅售649欧元,几乎可以在所有方面击败 Minisforum UH125 Pro。

注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里.

价格和供应情况

Minisforum UH125 Pro 现在可以直接从制造商商店预购。.用户也可以通过亚马逊等在线商店购买。

Minisforum UH125 Pro - 07/24/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Connectivity
72 / 81 → 89%
Weight
78%
Games Performance
44 / 80 → 55%
Application Performance
80 / 92 → 87%
Workstation
26%
AI Performance
71%
Temperature
95%
Noise
65%
Average
47%
75%
Mini PC - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
55.7%
Repairability
20%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 20.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Minisforum UH125 Pro 评测:配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 125H、32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘的 AI 迷你 PC,价格不菲
Sebastian Bade, 2024-07-27 (Update: 2024-07-27)