Notebookcheck Logo
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro review. Image source: Benedikt Winkel

更多百万像素 - Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 智能手机评测

Pro Glyph.

Nothing 发布了 Phone (3a) Pro。首先，它应该配备更好的摄像头，此外，它还支持 eSIM 卡。从外观上看，你可以从它的后盖清楚地看出它是一款 Nothing 手机。两款 3a 智能手机共享处理器、显示屏和电池。我们的评测将阐明 Pro 的与众不同之处。
Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

结论 - Phone (3a) Pro 敢于使用更好的摄像头

没有什么能比手机（3a）系列更专业了。从外观上看，只要看一下它的摄像头就能清楚地看出这一点。这就是差异所在。虽然镜头数量相同，但 3a Pro 的像素更高。我们尤其喜欢用它的潜望镜镜头拍摄的照片。

第二个优点是支持 eSIM 卡。如果这对您来说很重要，那么您需要选择 Pro。这款机型的细微差别就到此为止。没有什么比专业版多花 150 美元了。

这两款产品都拥有明亮的显示屏、独特的设计和较高的运行速度。总而言之，Nothing Phone 3a Pro 提供了一个全面的整体包，没有任何真正的弱点。

Pros

+ 独特的设计
+ 运行速度快
+ 明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏
+ 运行时间长

Cons

- 厚厚的摄像头驼峰
- 没有无线充电功能
- 振动马达声音大
- USB 2.0

价格和供应情况

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 目前的售价为 459 美元。您可以直接从制造商处购买。.

Phone (3a) 和 (3a) Pro 之间的差别不大：Pro 机型拥有不同的摄像头设置，并支持 eSIM 卡。

去年，Nothing 发布了 (2a)和 (2a) Plus-但没有 Pro 型号。3a Pro 的配置为 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。有两种配色可供选择：灰色和黑色。

规格

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (Phone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 8 x 1.8 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A720 / A520
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 810
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDDR5
Display
6.77 inch 19.9:9, 2392 x 1080 pixel 388 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, GSM (850/ 900/ 1800/ 1900 MHz), UMTS (Band 1/ 2/ 4/ 5/ 6/ 8/ 19), LTE (Band 1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ 5/ 7/ 8/ 12/ 17/ 18/ 18/ 29/ 26/ 28/ 38/ 40/ 41/ 42/ 48/ 66), 5G /Band 1/ 2/ 3/ 5/ 7/ 8/ 12/ 29/ 28/ 38/ 40/ 41/ 48/ 66/ 77/ 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.39 x 163.52 x 77.5
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, 24mm) + 50 MP (3x optical zoom, f/2.6, 70 mm) + 8 MP (f/2.2, 15 mm)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.2, 24 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, Keyboard Light: yes, USB cable (USB-C to USB-C), SIM tool, NothingOS 3.1, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive Audio, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, LHDC V1 / V2 / V3 / V5, Opus; DRM Widevine L1; Camera2API: Level 3; IP64-Rating; SAR-Head: 0,99 W/kg; SAR-Body: 1,29 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), Beidou (B1), fanless
Weight
211 g
Links
Nothing homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 带玻璃后壳的手机 (3a) Pro

Nothing 对其 A 系列产品进行了升级，采用了玻璃后壳，手感更像塑料。透明的背面和内置的 Glyphs（LED）形成了典型的 Nothing 外观。从外观上看，这款手机的相机岛与普通手机（3a）的相机岛截然不同，突出设备很远。

手机边框由铝合金制成，表面为哑光处理。机壳上的四个按键分布在两侧，非常合适。总体而言，这款手机的制造质量令人印象深刻，不过当你试图用力弯曲它时，它还是会发出轻微的吱吱声。

Phone (3a) Pro 通过了 IP64 认证，有一个可以自由分配的特殊按键--Nothing 称之为 "基本键"。它的显示屏由熊猫玻璃保护。

尺寸比较

❌
163.52 mm 77.5 mm 8.39 mm 211 g162.53 mm 74.67 mm 8.85 mm 205 g161.1 mm 77.4 mm 8.2 mm 213 g152.2 mm 72.7 mm 8.9 mm 188 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 3a Pro 只有 USB 2.0 接口

在只支持 USB 2.0 的 3a Pro 上，没有安装 USB-C 端口。它支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 作为外部数据载体的文件系统。在我们的测试中，（3a）Pro 与三星 PSSD T7 的传输速率达到了 27.72 MB/s。

虽然配备了 NFC，但购买者将不得不放弃存储扩展、插孔连接和红外传感器。

软件 - 6 年安全补丁和基本空间

Phone (3a) Pro 预装了Android 15 和 NothingOS 3.1。在测试期间，该设备收到了几次更新--在测试时，最新的安全补丁的日期是 2025 年 2 月。根据制造商的说法，Phone (3a) Pro 将在 3 年内提供软件更新，在 6 年内提供安全更新。

值得庆幸的是，没有安装任何臃肿的软件。该软件与原版Android 并无太大区别，但 Nothing 提供了非常独特的外观，拥有自己的字体和元素。如果需要，您可以激活经典的Android 设计。

一个特别的功能是所谓的 "基本空间"。据称，这是一个由图片、截图或录音组成的记忆中心。您可以使用 "基本密钥 "将媒体保存在这里。图像识别可提供内容描述。

可持续发展 - 无处不回收

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 的包装上标明了二氧化碳排放量： 51.3 千克。制造商称，中央框架由 100% 的回收铝制成。电路板上使用的锡据说也是完全可回收的，85% 的钢部件也是可回收的。据 Nothing 称，该手机在生产过程中使用了可再生能源。

它的包装完全不使用塑料。据说，安装的电池在经过 1200 次充电后仍有 90% 的电量。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 没有 6 GHz 频段的 3a Pro

Nothing Phone 3a Pro 支持 WiFi 6，但不在 6 GHz 频段内。在我们与参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 的测试中，它的传输速率令人印象深刻。

Phone (3a) Pro 支持 5G。在我们的测试中，它的接收效果很好。该设备支持大量频段，因此在进行测试的欧洲地区接收信号应该不成问题。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
951 (922min - 977max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
892 (522min - 975max) MBit/s -6%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=136)
864 MBit/s -9%
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
856 (450min - 907max) MBit/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
735 (671min - 791max) MBit/s -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=189, last 2 years)
726 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
834 (780min - 855max) MBit/s +1%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=134)
831 MBit/s +1%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
826 (709min - 868max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
823 (704min - 841max) MBit/s 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=187, last 2 years)
712 MBit/s -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
674 (627min - 734max) MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
1698 (1552min - 1819max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=82, last 2 years)
1437 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (614 - 1902, n=21)
1256 MBit/s
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
521 (418min - 644max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
1539 (695min - 1584max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=82, last 2 years)
1367 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (743 - 1816, n=21)
1228 MBit/s
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
754 (611min - 828max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (922-977)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø735 (671-791)
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø824 (709-868)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (704-841)
全球导航卫星系统测量：户外
全球导航卫星系统测量：户外
全球导航卫星系统测量：室内
全球导航卫星系统测量：室内

3a Pro 支持单频模式下的所有常见卫星系统。在我们的测试中，建立连接需要几秒钟。此外，它的定位不是特别准确。在日常使用中，使用导航软件（如谷歌地图）没有任何问题。

全球导航卫星系统测量：池塘
全球导航卫星系统测量：池塘
全球导航卫星系统测量：路线
全球导航卫星系统测量：路线
全球导航卫星系统测量：概要
全球导航卫星系统测量：概要

电话功能和通话质量 - Nothing 3a Pro 听起来不错

谷歌的手机应用没有任何依赖性，其操作也并不神秘。手机的通话质量令人印象深刻。如果需要，听筒和扬声器的声音可以变得非常大。在我们的测试中，对方的声音听起来很清晰。

3a Pro 用户也能清楚地听懂，没有任何背景噪音。

摄像头 - 3a Pro 的三倍 5000 万像素

Nothing Phone 3a Pro 上的自拍照
Nothing Phone 3a Pro 上的自拍照

Nothing 在 Phone (3a) Pro 的背面安装了三个镜头。主摄像头、潜望镜和自拍摄像头的分辨率均为 50 万像素。变焦和前置摄像头与普通版（3a）相比有所升级。

使用 3a Pro 拍摄的照片动态效果很好，色彩也很鲜艳。不过，我们注意到锐度不够。(3a) Pro 能很好地应对弱光环境下的拍摄，但拍摄对象看起来比较暗淡。我们喜欢它的 3 倍变焦、光学防抖和快速自动对焦功能。

(3a) Pro 的手动模式有很多设置选项，夜景模式和微距模式也能提供细节丰富的图像。人像模式提供四种不同的焦距。

所有镜头都能以最高 4K 和 30 fps 的速度录制视频。只有以 1080p 拍摄时才能达到 60 fps。变焦镜头的视频质量明显落后于主镜头。总的来说，这款手机的视频质量不错，防抖效果也很可靠。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

RabbitPondUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light
ColorChecker
10 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
0.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (3a) Pro: 6.93 ∆E min: 0.22 - max: 12.32 ∆E
ColorChecker
24.5 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
53.6 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
29 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
53.2 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
56.7 ∆E
45.3 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (3a) Pro: 37.16 ∆E min: 12.85 - max: 56.66 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不包括屏幕保护膜

Phone (3a) Pro 并没有附带太多东西。包装中只有一个 SIM 卡工具和一条 USB-C 至 USB-C 连接线。屏幕保护器已安装好，可以正常使用。在美国，Nothing 手机享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 3a Pro 的振动马达声音很大

Nothing 手机开箱即使用谷歌的 Gboard 键盘。输入内容可以直接在显示屏边缘可靠识别。尽管贴有屏幕保护膜，但手感还是不错的。在测试期间，保护膜没有脱落，也没有恼人的边缘。

设备内置的线性振动电机能提供清晰的反馈，但声音清晰可闻。Phone 3a Pro 可以通过二维面部识别或显示屏上的光学指纹识别器解锁。

显示屏 - 3a Pro 的 AMOLED 面板明亮且采样率高

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Nothing 手机配备了 6.77 英寸 AMOLED 面板。在 APL18 测试中，我们测得激活环境光传感器后的最大亮度为 1412 cd/m²。在显示 HDR 内容时，屏幕亮度达到 1347 尼特；在不使用环境光传感器的情况下，我们测得的亮度为 768 cd/m²。

在测试过程中，我们测得屏幕闪烁有两种不同的幅度。除了 90 Hz 的基本频率外，我们还发现了 740 Hz 的二次高频闪烁。使用 PWM 调光模式，3a Pro 的频率应可高达 2160 Hz。

根据 DRM-Info 提供的信息，它的刷新率分为 30、60、90 和 120 Hz；默认情况下，软件会自适应调整屏幕的刷新率。据制造商称，其采样率应为 480 Hz，使用游戏模式时甚至可达 1000 Hz。

1296
cd/m²		1294
cd/m²		1297
cd/m²
1318
cd/m²		1318
cd/m²		1288
cd/m²
1318
cd/m²		1320
cd/m²		1309
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1320 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1306.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1218 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Google Pixel 8a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"
Screen
9%
-2%
6%
Brightness middle
1318
1210
-8%
962
-27%
1518
15%
Brightness
1306
1222
-6%
967
-26%
1466
12%
Brightness Distribution
98
92
-6%
99
1%
88
-10%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.5
1
33%
1.6
-7%
1.2
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.9
2.7
7%
2.6
10%
3.3
-14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
1.5
35%
1.5
35%
2
13%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.25 98%
2.13 103%
2.2 100%
CCT
6819 95%
6509 100%
6382 102%
6786 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz
Amplitude: 13.25 %
Secondary Frequency: 740 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8516 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

Phone 3a Pro 在色彩准确度方面达到了同类产品的平均水平。其面板在灰度方面的偏差最大。根据我们的 Calman 2D 测量，它的 sRGB 色彩空间覆盖率为 98.2%。

色彩精度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩精度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.575 ms rise
↘ 0.654 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3185 ms rise
↘ 0.3365 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Phone (3a) 的显示屏足够明亮，即使在阳光下也清晰可辨。其可视角度令人印象深刻。从锐利的角度仍能清楚地看到内容，而且没有色彩渐变。

性能 - Phone 3a Pro 在同类产品中处于平均水平

骁龙 7S 骁龙 7S 第 3 代手机 (3a) Pro 使用的是 SoC。这款智能手机的性能在同类产品中处于平均水平。只有 谷歌 Pixel 8a的 Tensor G3在几乎所有的基准测试中都要好得多。

Geekbench 6.4 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1699 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=200, last 2 years)
1541 Points +31%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1179 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1162 - 1179, n=3)
1171 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1162 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4408 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=200, last 2 years)
4395 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3298 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (3239 - 3298, n=3)
3262 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3239 Points -2%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1267 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=168, last 2 years)
1084 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
893 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
891 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (854 - 893, n=3)
870 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
854 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=168, last 2 years)
3652 Points +24%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3366 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3349 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3242 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (2894 - 3242, n=3)
3028 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
2947 Points
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=132, last 2 years)
1327541 Points +69%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1049981 Points +33%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
787469 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (756800 - 795329, n=3)
779866 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
756800 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
740935 Points -6%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
13874 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=196, last 2 years)
13808 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (10617 - 15606, n=3)
13366 Points +26%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11565 Points +9%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
10617 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=164, last 2 years)
979 Points +29%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
919 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
784 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (759 - 785, n=3)
768 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
760 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
759 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7088 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=162, last 2 years)
6751 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (5402 - 5543, n=3)
5458 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5430 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5402 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4964 Points -9%
System
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
11778 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=162, last 2 years)
10573 Points +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
10153 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (7930 - 10153, n=3)
8918 Points +12%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
7930 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7828 Points -1%
Memory
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9837 Points +22%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8078 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=162, last 2 years)
7445 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (5642 - 8078, n=3)
7132 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5642 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4109 Points -49%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
19263 Points +122%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18837 Points +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
9482 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (8662 - 9482, n=3)
9032 Points +4%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8662 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8511 Points -2%
Web
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1762 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=162, last 2 years)
1604 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1566 - 1585, n=3)
1573 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1567 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1566 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1474 Points -6%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
29654 Points +243%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=153, last 2 years)
17885 Points +107%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8652 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (8460 - 8652, n=3)
8579 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8460 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5205 Points -40%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=45, last 2 years)
764 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
230 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (n=1)
230 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
122 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=45, last 2 years)
3546 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
231 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (n=1)
231 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
122 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=45, last 2 years)
5123 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
548 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (n=1)
548 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
444 Points
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=36, last 2 years)
930 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
107 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (96.6 - 100, n=2)
98.3 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
96.6 Points
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=40, last 2 years)
4543 Points +231%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1373 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1246 - 1388, n=3)
1336 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1246 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
324 Points -76%

Nothing 手机采用 Adreno 810作为图形处理器。基准测试结果显示了与 CPU 性能相同的结果。在浏览器基准测试中，两者的性能比较接近。安装的存储设备的写入速度非常快，而 像素 8a和 三星Galaxy A55在读取速度方面明显更胜一筹。

Phone 3a Pro 的性能足以流畅地使用超 HDR 和极限帧率设置玩《PUBG Mobile》。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2353 Points +122%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
1060 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1039 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 Points -14%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2359 Points +124%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
1055 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1054 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
926 Points -12%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8960 Points +115%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
4176 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4131 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3992 Points -4%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8976 Points +125%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4103 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
3981 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3897 Points -2%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
989 Points +158%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
383 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points -8%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points +165%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
375 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
359 Points -4%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5850 Points +27%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
4593 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
4593 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4581 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3005 Points -35%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14498 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7170 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6715 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
6697 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
6697 Points 0%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7856 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6828 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6085 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
6078 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
6078 Points 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98 fps +63%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
373 fps +187%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
131 fps +1%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
130 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +37%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
59 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -3%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241 fps +184%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps +12%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
85 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +81%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +6%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
54 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +89%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +8%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
62 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
61 fps -2%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +159%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +10%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
29 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -21%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +111%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +3%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
35 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -3%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +111%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
28 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -21%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
20 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -5%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +76%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
46 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
52 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -6%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
8.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps -10%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (118 - 161.6, n=3)
137.4 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=171, last 2 years)
133.9 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)
132.67 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
131.393 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
118.037 Points -11%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
94.765 Points -29%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 135)
170 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (144 - 176, n=3)
163.3 runs/min -4%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
161 runs/min -5%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=151, last 2 years)
161 runs/min -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
144 runs/min -15%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
116 runs/min -32%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=90, last 2 years)
12.5 runs/min +25%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
10.5 runs/min +5%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 135)
10 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (8.58 - 11.2, n=3)
9.93 runs/min -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
8.58 runs/min -14%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
6.3 runs/min -37%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (110 - 149, n=3)
128 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
126 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)
125 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=162, last 2 years)
124.8 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
110 Points -12%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
95 Points -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
46738 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)
44460 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (37415 - 45346, n=3)
42407 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
42229 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
41576 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
37415 Points -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=171, last 2 years)
1445 ms * -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
1044 ms * -19%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
1012.6 ms * -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (862 - 1044, n=3)
927 ms * -6%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
886.7 ms * -1%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)
875.1 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Nothing Phone (3a) ProXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5GSamsung Galaxy A55 5GGoogle Pixel 8aGlobal Average -3Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
9%
-19%
-53%
48%
Sequential Read 256KB
996.23
992.72
0%
1688.53
69%
1509.65
52%
679 ?(4.36 - 4512, n=1807)
-32%
2030 ?(269 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years)
104%
Sequential Write 256KB
970.63
931.68
-4%
831.44
-14%
255.31
-74%
412 ?(2.04 - 4030, n=1807)
-58%
1646 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=193, last 2 years)
70%
Random Read 4KB
255.89
171.2
-33%
351.47
37%
165.98
-35%
111.7 ?(1.04 - 543, n=1807)
-56%
282 ?(47.6 - 504, n=193, last 2 years)
10%
Random Write 4KB
304.95
186.14
-39%
132.11
-57%
243.82
-20%
102.5 ?(3.84 - 964, n=1808)
-66%
325 ?(9.4 - 964, n=193, last 2 years)
7%

排放物 - 3a Pro 上的立体声声音过大

温度 - Phone 3a Pro 仅在极端条件下才会发热

在极端负载情况下--我们使用了 "Burnout "基准测试--Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 会明显发热。我们在正面测得的最高温度为 43.3 摄氏度。但在日常使用过程中，该设备仍能保持良好的冷却状态。此外，我们在玩游戏或看电影时也没有发现任何发热问题。

Max. Load
 43.2 °C43 °C39.1 °C 
 43.3 °C42.6 °C38.5 °C 
 42.5 °C40.3 °C38.4 °C 
Maximum: 43.3 °C
Average: 41.2 °C
37.3 °C37.7 °C39.7 °C
34.7 °C37.7 °C39.5 °C
33.6 °C37.4 °C38.1 °C
Maximum: 39.7 °C
Average: 37.3 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
99.5 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93.4 % -6%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.4 % -48%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
99 %
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.3 % -2%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -48%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
99 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % 0%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.1 % -45%
05101520Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.31 (6.25-6.32)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.8 (23.7-23.8)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.8 (24.7-24.9)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.8 (2.78-2.81)

扬声器 - 仅在无手机框架内振动

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 采用立体声扬声器。手机的音质很好--中音，尤其是高音非常线性。即使音量很大，扬声器也不会使声音失真。智能手机的音量非常大，而且背面没有振动，只有边框在全音量时有轻微振动。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.2462532.536.43121.931.84031.429.35033.538.96321.730.7802430.310017.835.112516.643.116019.754.42001952.125017.559.731516.260.840016.562.450012.368.163012.371.38001570.9100013.273.2125012.476160011.675.7200013.377.925001278.3315012.779.8400012.980.1500013.379.563001380.1800013.1801000013.579.71250013.670.81600013.463.2SPL25.489.9N0.782.2median 13.3median 73.2Delta1.79.527.333.426.235.525.938.429.240.335.642.325.935.822.14117.840.517.146.518.157.414.255.214.15610.758.61159.312.863.711.164.61271.111.774.71279.312.877.412.479.512.379.713.3821384.213.581.613.278.913.878.213.776.113.469.313.360.624.991.40.685.1median 13.2median 74.719.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNothing Phone (3a) ProSamsung Galaxy A55 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (0.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - (3a) Pro 是一款长跑型产品

功耗 - 3a Pro 非常节俭

在同类产品中，Phone (3a) Pro 的耗电量表现出色。在最低耗电量方面，两者相差无几。但在负载情况下，Nothing 智能手机的耗电量明显比对比设备低。与 小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G配备了 相同的 SoC.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.21 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.89 / 1.3 / 1.33 Watt
Load midlight 3.29 / 4.76 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
5110 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-17%
-47%
-61%
-10%
-52%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
1.07
-20%
0.85
4%
0.92
-3%
0.963 ?(0.89 - 1.07, n=3)
-8%
0.872 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=163, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Average *
1.3
1.26
3%
1.51
-16%
1.46
-12%
1.41 ?(1.26 - 1.67, n=3)
-8%
1.438 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=163, last 2 years)
-11%
Idle Maximum *
1.33
1.28
4%
1.71
-29%
1.65
-24%
1.43 ?(1.28 - 1.68, n=3)
-8%
1.582 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=163, last 2 years)
-19%
Load Average *
3.29
3.7
-12%
4.87
-48%
7.96
-142%
3.56 ?(3.29 - 3.7, n=3)
-8%
6.99 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years)
-112%
Load Maximum *
4.76
7.52
-58%
11.73
-146%
10.74
-126%
5.68 ?(4.75 - 7.52, n=3)
-19%
10.4 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years)
-118%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.82 (0.773-4.77)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.39 (1.069-7.71)
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.771 (0.747-0.885)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.801-1.104)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.711.21.51.722.22.52.733.23.53.744.24.54.7Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.91 (3.76-4.01)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.15 (3.93-4.98)
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.771 (0.747-0.885)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.801-1.104)

运行时间 - 3a Pro 没有无线充电功能

该设备的低功耗在续航时间方面表现出色。Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 在我们的实际 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中持续了近 20 个小时。因此，3a 成功击败了对比设备，尽管 Redmi Note 14 Pro+的电池容量更大。

在日常使用中，如果你不给它施加很大的压力，(3a) Pro 可以使用两天。我们并没有承诺能以最大 50 瓦的功率快速充电，并在一小时内充满电。在测试过程中，如果不使用 Nothing 充电器，我们无法实现这一目标。

使用 Anker 335 充电器，3a Pro 在 60 分钟后就充满了 80%的电量。我们只需要不到 90 分钟就能充满电。3a Pro 不支持无线充电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
19h 48min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
5000 mAh
1188 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
5110 mAh
1168 min
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
1077 min
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
796 min

Notebookcheck 总评分

Phone (3a) Pro 很明显是一款 Nothing 智能手机。它的外观引人注目，但其内在价值也是正确的。性能、显示屏、电池续航时间：（3a）Pro 令人印象深刻。它的摄像头设置也非常棒。

我们希望它的摄像头能更清晰，振动马达能更安静，WiFi 接收能支持 6 GHz 频段。

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro - 04/14/2025 v8
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
48 / 69 → 69%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
18 / 55 → 33%
Application Performance
60 / 85 → 71%
AI Performance
16%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
78%
Average
73%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
87%
Materials
65%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
97.1%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
83.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 76.2%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
79.6%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
12 GB Memory		Amazon:
1. $8.99
(3 Pack) Designed for Nothin...
2. $8.99
Fhyeugfy for Nothing Phone (...
3. $6.99
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for...
211 g6.77"
2392x1080
388 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 更多百万像素 - Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 智能手机评测
Benedikt Winkel, 2025-04-16 (Update: 2025-04-16)