Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 评测--配备 200 万像素摄像头的中端重磅机型

新方法。

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 是小米平价中端系列中的顶级机型，配备 200 万像素高分辨率摄像头、IP 认证和明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕。我们的测试将揭晓它是否能成为内幕消息。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

结论：最激烈的竞争来自小米

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 与前代产品相比，几乎没有做得更好的地方--它的新 SoC 甚至略微慢了一些，但它更节能，AI 能力更强。这也是小米智能手机的新特点之一：其相当丰富的 AI 功能，这在Redmi Note 14 系列的姐妹机型中是找不到的。此外，它还支持 eSIM 卡、120 瓦快速充电和 IP68 认证。

全球机型的一个缺点是在电池和缺乏光学变焦方面节省了技术成本。后者尤其令人遗憾，因为附加镜头并不是最好的。此外，这款智能手机的发布版本是Android 14，这意味着承诺的三个版本升级没有最初看起来那么慷慨。另外，小米在自己的队伍中还有一个强劲的竞争对手，即 Poco X7 Pro，它提供的人工智能更少，但速度更快。

Pros

+ 设计美观，通过 IP68 认证
+ 明亮准确的显示屏
+ 三频无线局域网和 5G
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 存储降级
- 附加镜头，质量一般
- 与中国版本相比有妥协
- 没有无线充电功能，只有 USB 2.0 接口

价格和供应情况

您可以在亚马逊等主要在线零售商处订购小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G，目前售价为 429.50 美元。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
79.6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $287.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
2. $6.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Redmi Not...
3. $6.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
List Price: 530€		205 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
2.
81.9%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 		Amazon: $399.00
List Price: 549€		188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"
2400x1080
431 PPI
AMOLED
3.
87.4% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 530 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $3.49
Natbok 2+2 Pack for Samsung ...
2. $4.49
QsmQam 3 Pack Screen Protect...
3. $5.65
Qinmay Phone Case for Samsun...
List Price: 529€		213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"
2340x1080
390 PPI
Super AMOLED
4.
80.9%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
2. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
3. $9.99
MOOISVS [2+2pack] for Xiaomi...
List Price: 430€		198 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
5.
77.3%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $3.47
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $8.99
Iiseon High Sensitivity Hydr...
3. $7.82
Pusiikeer 2 Pack for Motorol...
List Price: 499€		171 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"
2670x1220
459 PPI
P-OLED

Pro Plus 5G 是小米Redmi Note 14 系列中的顶级机型，是 13 Pro+ 5G 的直接继承者。 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G.查看其数据表可以发现，小米不仅更换了 SoC，还更换了存储空间。不幸的是，这被证明是一次降级，配备 LPDDR5 和 UFS 3.1 的机型被保留给了中国市场。

总的来说，小米似乎对这款面向国内市场的机型采取了一些不同的做法：它的摄像头设置由两个 5000 万像素的传感器组成，其中第二个是光学变焦，只有超广角与我们的测试机型相同。它的 6200 毫安时电池也更加强劲。另一方面，快速充电速度较慢，而且中国机型不支持 eSIM 卡。

如果不是这两款智能手机外观相同，你可能会认为它们是不同的机型。此外，Redmi Note 14 系列在中国要便宜得多，即使已经考虑了通常的进口税和附加税。

规格 Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Redmi Note 14 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 8 x 1.8 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A720 / A520
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 810, Core: 895 MHz
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, up to 480 Hz touch-sampling rate, 12-bit color depth, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 512 GB 
, 480.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.85 x 162.53 x 74.67
Battery
5110 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.65, 1/1.4", 23 mm, OIS) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 15 mm) + 2 MPix (Macro, f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.2, 26 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: OnScreen, 120-watt charger, USB cable, case, SIM tool, HyperOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, apX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LHDC V5, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1l, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 29.43 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: 0.987 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.968 W/kg | max. charging speed: 120 Watt (wired), fanless, waterproof
Weight
205 g, Power Supply: 201 g
Price
530 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

保护壳 - 用于Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 的大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2

小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 有冰霜蓝、午夜黑和薰衣草紫三种颜色。后者也是我们的测试机，采用了仿皮背壳。它的屏占比高达 88%，非常出色。圆润的显示屏边缘让人感觉非常纤薄，尽管重达 201 克，但拿在手上却非常舒适。

我们非常喜欢这款手机的制造质量。所有缝隙都紧密均匀，当我们试图扭动红米智能手机时，它也不会发出任何嘎吱声。它通过了 IP68 认证，这意味着它既防尘又防水。

背面的摄像头模块看起来很强大，但不会让人感觉头重脚轻。它现在采用了铝制边框，有些地方还经过了磨砂处理。该设备的显示屏再次受到康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 的保护。

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 附带保护套

尺寸比较

❌
162.53 mm 74.67 mm 8.85 mm 205 g161.4 mm 74.2 mm 8.9 mm 204.5 g161.1 mm 77.4 mm 8.2 mm 213 g160.75 mm 75.24 mm 8.43 mm 198 g154.1 mm 71.2 mm 8.1 mm 171 g152.2 mm 72.7 mm 8.9 mm 188 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连通性 - 附加费和倒退

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 的全球版本再次提供两种存储容量：8/256 GB 和 12/512 GB，但现在这两种机型的价格会稍高一些。较小的型号价格约为 520 美元，较大的型号价格约为 550 美元。此外，这两个版本现在都只使用 LPDDR4x 和 UFS 2.2。

除此之外，这款小米智能手机的配置也不错，除了蓝牙 5.4 和 NFC 外，还配备了红外爆破器和 eSIM 支持。不出所料，它的 USB 2.0 端口在拷贝测试中没有达到最佳数值，仅为 29.43 MB/s。不过，让我们感到有些意外的是，这款顶级产品的输出电压有所降低，这就是为什么我们在华硕 ROG Strix Arion 机箱中使用的三星 980 Pro 在连接到它时无法运行，而我们不得不使用更省钱的 三星 PSSD T7.

我们在测试中还注意到，当我们将智能手机连接到电脑时，它的存储访问速度非常慢。

顶部：麦克风、扬声器、麦克风
顶部：麦克风、扬声器、麦克风
左侧
左侧
右：音量、功率
右：音量、功率
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡

软件 -Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 四年更新一次

小米手机的操作系统是Android 14 和 HyperOS 1.0，遗憾的是还没有更新的Android 15。这意味着所承诺的三次主要更新将在Android 17 时结束。安全补丁的有效期为四年。目前尚不清楚安全补丁的推出时间间隔。在测试时，安全补丁的日期是 2024 年 12 月 1 日，而 Play 系统更新的日期仍然是 2024 年 7 月 1 日。虽然它是该系列中最昂贵的智能手机，但令人惊讶的是，它并没有获得最长时间的更新--这些更新是留给 Redmi Note 14 LTE的更新时间为 4 + 6 年。

尽管如此，Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 还支持小米的互联功能，允许连接到同一小米账户的设备无缝协同工作。此外，还搭载了一些 AI 功能，如 Note 应用中的校对或翻译、图像增强、图像橡皮擦、实时翻译和 Circle to Search。

可持续性

小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 包装在一个完全由硬纸板制成的纸盒中，但不幸的是，它被塑料薄膜包裹着。此外，包装盒内还使用了两层薄膜来包裹手机壳和智能手机，这两层薄膜似乎是由可堆肥的生物塑料制成的。

这款智能手机不能由用户自行维修，因此小米公司没有提供任何维修说明。制造商也没有提供任何有关其二氧化碳排放量的信息或可持续发展报告。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备三频无线局域网的小米手机

小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 支持所有移动通信标准的各种频率，包括 5G Sub6。在我们的测试中，它在大都市环境中的接收效果良好，无可挑剔。

红米智能手机的 Wi-Fi 6E 支持所有三个 Wi-Fi 频段，与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用时，传输速率基本稳定。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 522) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
674 (min: 627) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1698 (min: 1552) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1539 (min: 695) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
856 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
521 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
754 (min: 611) MBit/s ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼87%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
965 (min: 877) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
899 (min: 822) MBit/s ∼95%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
762 (min: 640) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
939 (min: 843) MBit/s ∼99%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
956 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
947 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1435 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
711 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
694 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1429 (min: 521) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1363 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼89%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1698 (1552-1819)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1515 (695-1584)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (522-975)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø735 (671-791)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø673 (627-734)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (704-841)
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动
GPS 测试：室内
室内

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 支持连接卫星网络的所有全球网络，但只能使用单频连接。不过，它的卫星定位能力在户外非常快速准确。

在一次短途步行中，我们将智能手机的定位精度与 Garmin Venu 2.Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 被证明更加准确，尤其是在比较困难的情况下，在日常生活中应始终可靠地引导用户到达目的地。

全球导航卫星系统测试：绕池塘旅行
全球导航卫星系统测试：绕池塘旅行
全球导航卫星系统测试：路线
全球导航卫星系统测试：路线
全球导航卫星系统测试：摘要
全球导航卫星系统测试：摘要

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持 eSIM 的Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G

小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 的通话质量在贴近耳朵时不错，在安静的环境中也能自然还原声音。不过，它的背景噪声抑制效果并不好。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。

这款智能手机可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡。如果没有第二个插槽，也可以激活 eSIM 卡。

相机 - 不带光学变焦的全球版本

手机正面的 2000 万像素镜头具有固定焦距、集成提词器功能，并能以高达 60fps 的速度录制全高清视频。

背面三摄像头的核心是一个 200 万像素的传感器，采用光学防抖技术。在日光下，它能拍摄出不错的照片，尽管在细节和动态方面略有欠缺。在弱光环境下也是如此，但我们喜欢它的光线构成，尽管照片噪点较多，缺乏细节。

附加的超广角镜头只有 800 万像素的分辨率，拍摄效果的细节也相应较差。用它拍摄的照片在色调上也显得非常冷淡。使用 200 万像素微距镜头拍摄的照片噪点较多，即使在光线条件良好的情况下也几乎无法使用。

主传感器采用的完全是数字变焦，因为与中国市场的版本不同，世界其他地区无法使用光学变焦。虽然 2 倍的放大率仍能带来不错的效果，但 4 倍变焦时细节已经变得平淡无奇，超过 4 倍变焦后也不会有更好的效果。最大可实现 30 倍数码变焦，但图像稳定功能显然难以满足要求，而且与更昂贵的机型不同，该应用中没有集成额外的电子取景器。

无变焦（23 毫米）
2 倍变焦（46 毫米）
4 倍变焦（92 毫米）
10 倍变焦（230 毫米）
30 倍变焦（689 毫米）
微距拍摄

最多只能以 24 或 30fps 的超高清速度录制视频，而对于喜欢全高清的用户，最高可达到 60fps。它的图像防抖效果不错，但偶尔会导致图像有点滞后。声音效果不错，但能听到一些明显的噪音。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light

在受控照明条件下，Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 在色彩再现方面没有出现任何重大异常。ColorChecker 图像中偏差最大的是青色，DeltaE 约为 10.2。

我们的测试图使用 200-MPix 模式拍摄，细节表现良好，但在彩色区域往往会忽略一些细节。

ColorChecker
3.1 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G: 5.64 ∆E min: 0.68 - max: 10.17 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
76 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G: 47.14 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 92.92 ∆E

附件和保修 -Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 不带电源

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 随附一条 USB 数据线、一个黑色硅胶保护套和一个 SIM 卡工具。不过，欧盟和英国的机型没有电源适配器，考虑到其 120 瓦的快速充电选项，这一点尤其令人失望。小米公司提供的合适充电器价格约为 60 美元。

小米只为其智能手机提供 12 个月的保修服务。您可以选择购买小米关怀保险套餐，该套餐可为两年内的意外损坏或盗窃提供保障。

输入设备和操作 - 480 赫兹的小米智能手机

小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 的电容式触摸屏采样率为 480 Hz，能快速、精确地处理输入。显示屏上集成了光学指纹传感器，可以可靠地识别存储的指纹并快速解锁设备。您也可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，但这种方式不太安全，而且在黑暗中也不可靠。

X 轴线性马达可提供清晰的振动，并可在手机设置中根据自己的要求进行调整。指纹传感器还可用于测量心率。此外，这款智能手机还支持手势快捷键和单手模式。

显示屏 -Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 上的超亮 120 Hz OLED 显示屏

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

手机的 6.7 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏分辨率为 2,712 x 1,220 像素，像素密度很高。它的刷新率高达 120 Hz，可在 60、90 或 120 Hz 下动态工作。您也可以手动设置为 60 或 120 Hz。Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 支持所有常见的 HDR 标准。

在显示全白屏幕时，其亮度可达 1,210 cd/m²--这是一个不错的值，但当屏幕面积缩小时，亮度几乎不会变亮（APL18：1,280 cd/m²）。只有在显示 HDR 内容时，它才能达到 3,081 cd/m² 的峰值亮度。

与所有 OLED 屏幕一样，这块屏幕也会闪烁。除了 120 Hz 的低频基频外，我们还测量到 1923 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光（在最低显示亮度下）。因此，该面板相对来说比较养眼，但我们也不能完全排除特别敏感用户的抱怨。

1190
cd/m²		1213
cd/m²		1284
cd/m²
1179
cd/m²		1210
cd/m²		1276
cd/m²
1178
cd/m²		1206
cd/m²		1258
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1284 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1221.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 1210 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Google Pixel 8a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Motorola Edge 50 Neo
P-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
-6%
-15%
0%
-27%
4%
Brightness middle
1210
1518
25%
962
-20%
1034
-15%
1246
3%
1240
2%
Brightness
1222
1466
20%
967
-21%
1041
-15%
1235
1%
1233
1%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
99
8%
97
5%
98
7%
98
7%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.2
-20%
1.6
-60%
1
-0%
1.8
-80%
1.1
-10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
3.3
-22%
2.6
4%
2.2
19%
3.81
-41%
2.2
19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
2
-33%
1.5
-0%
1.4
7%
2.3
-53%
1.4
7%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.2 100%
2.13 103%
2.22 99%
2.191 100%
2.21 100%
CCT
6509 100%
6786 96%
6382 102%
6553 99%
6488 100%
6669 97%

* ... smaller is better

Display: HDR Peak Brightness | APL18 Peak Brightness
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3081 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2824 cd/m² -8%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2237 cd/m² -27%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1883 cd/m² -39%
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2136 cd/m² +67%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1678 cd/m² +31%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1372 cd/m² +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1280 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 15.71 %
Secondary Frequency: 1923 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

在显示设置中选择Original Color PRO色彩方案和暖色调色温，就能获得最自然的屏幕效果。Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 在色彩表现方面没有出现任何失误，也没有过度使用饱和度。预设的鲜艳 模式明显偏冷，使用的色彩饱和度更高。

灰度（色彩方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（配色方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（配色方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配色方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配色方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.752 ms rise
↘ 0.6575 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.79 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.925 ms rise
↘ 0.86 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

在室外，Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 在大多数光线条件下仍然易于阅读；但在平视角度下，其表面的反光可能会分散注意力。

另一方面，如果不启动环境光传感器，智能手机会更快地达到极限，因为此时只有 508 cd/m²。如果激活了阳光模式，智能手机在明亮的环境光下亮度仍会增加到 508 cd/m²。

阴影中的小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
背阴
阳光下的小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
在阳光下

显示屏的可视角度稳定性不错，但在平视角度下会出现轻微的绿色雾影，亮度也会略有下降。

小米Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G 的可视角度稳定性
小米Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G 的可视角度稳定性

性能 - 搭载骁龙 7s 第三代处理器的红米智能手机

小米智能手机采用 骁龙 7s 第 3 代，可使用 8 或 12 GB LPDDR4x 内存。从技术上讲，考虑到Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 的价格区间，也可以使用更快的 LPDDR5 内存，而且可能更合适。

在纯 CPU 性能方面，4 纳米 SoC 表现出色，但被 Exynos 1480在 Geekbench 多核测试中不敌 Exynos 1480。在 像素 8a(张力 G3)和 Poco X7 Pro(Dimensity 8400)在这种情况下都处于不同的水平。系统和人工智能基准测试的情况也差不多。

在日常使用中，系统大部分时间都能流畅运行，但在较长时间的休息后，主屏幕加载可能需要两秒左右的时间。

Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1699 Points +46%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1598 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=186, last 2 years)
1496 Points +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1162 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
1162 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1147 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1051 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
6239 Points +93%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4408 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=186, last 2 years)
4228 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3239 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
3239 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2977 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2715 Points -16%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1695493 Points +124%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=122, last 2 years)
1299153 Points +72%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1049981 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
767738 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
756800 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
756800 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
740935 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
15116 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
14805 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
13874 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
13874 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)
13528 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
12313 Points -11%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11565 Points -17%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1287 Points +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=164, last 2 years)
945 Points +25%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
919 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
784 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
759 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
759 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
686 Points -10%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8278 Points +53%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7088 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=158, last 2 years)
6549 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5402 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
5402 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
5192 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4964 Points -8%
System
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
11778 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=158, last 2 years)
10362 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
10153 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
10153 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
9366 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8761 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7828 Points -23%
Memory
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9837 Points +74%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8484 Points +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7133 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
5847 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5642 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
5642 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4109 Points -27%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
36491 Points +285%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18837 Points +99%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
18465 Points +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10386 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
9482 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
9482 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8511 Points -10%
Web
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1762 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1731 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1586 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1567 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
1567 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1474 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1278 Points -18%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
49010 Points +479%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
29654 Points +251%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
28870 Points +241%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years)
18068 Points +114%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8460 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
8460 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5205 Points -38%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
29244 Points +4066%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=140, last 2 years)
25922 Points +3593%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
702 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
702 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
585 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
Points -100%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=45, last 2 years)
764 Points +232%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
540 Points +135%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
230 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
230 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
122 Points -47%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=45, last 2 years)
3546 Points +1435%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1322 Points +472%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
231 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
231 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
122 Points -47%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=45, last 2 years)
5123 Points +835%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2710 Points +395%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
548 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
548 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
444 Points -19%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1181 Points +1123%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=34, last 2 years)
974 Points +908%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
107 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
96.6 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
96.6 Points 0%
Score V6
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
5141 Points +313%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 10957, n=30, last 2 years)
3603 Points +189%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1246 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  ()
1246 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
324 Points -74%

集成的 Adreno 810负责图形计算，其速度之慢令人惊讶，计算能力甚至低于 ARM Mali-G610 MP4的 前代机型.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3691 Points +255%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2353 Points +126%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1202 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1039 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 Points -18%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3840 Points +264%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2359 Points +124%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1191 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1054 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
926 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 Points -18%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12261 Points +197%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8960 Points +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4483 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4131 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3992 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3159 Points -24%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8976 Points +119%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4336 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4103 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3897 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3169 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1333 Points +277%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
989 Points +179%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
350 Points -1%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1272 Points +254%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
359 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
336 Points -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +22%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
568 fps +334%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
373 fps +185%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
191 fps +46%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
131 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +111%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +109%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
243 fps +189%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241 fps +187%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +183%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +133%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
199 fps +226%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
61 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +296%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +226%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps +259%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +118%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73 fps +232%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +168%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -18%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps +205%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -5%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -30%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps +209%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +131%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps +194%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -27%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps +218%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.5 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps -10%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.2 fps -30%

在浏览器基准测试中，Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 浏览器排名居中。对这款手机来说，日常网页浏览不成问题，但包含 Java 元素的网站加载时间稍长。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
139.947 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
131.393 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (111.1 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
128.4 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
118.037 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ()
118 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
94.765 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
83.784 Points -29%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
192 runs/min +33%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
161 runs/min +12%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=149, last 2 years)
153.5 runs/min +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
144 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ()
144 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
116 runs/min -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
112 runs/min -22%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=82, last 2 years)
12.2 runs/min +42%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
11.7 runs/min +36%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
10.5 runs/min +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
8.58 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ()
8.58 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
6.3 runs/min -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
6.27 runs/min -27%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
144 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
126 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=158, last 2 years)
121.5 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
110 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ()
110 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
95 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
86 Points -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
47146 Points +26%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
46738 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
41576 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)
40353 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
39060 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
37415 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ()
37415 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
23567 Points -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=166, last 2 years)
1481 ms * -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
1296.2 ms * -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
1044 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ()
1044 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
1012.6 ms * +3%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
886.7 ms * +15%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
882.5 ms * +15%

* ... smaller is better

小米智能手机的 UFS 2.2 存储速度相当慢，比其前代产品的 UFS 3.1 存储速度又慢了许多。 前代产品.在这方面，更快的存储空间也是小米没有采用的一种选择。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5GGoogle Pixel 8aSamsung Galaxy A55 5GXiaomi Poco X7 ProMotorola Edge 50 NeoXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5GAverage 512 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
2%
34%
108%
52%
66%
20%
75%
Sequential Read 256KB
992.72
1509.65
52%
1688.53
70%
3969.01
300%
1023
3%
1921.64
94%
1033 ?(529 - 1860, n=8)
4%
1951 ?(269 - 4512, n=190, last 2 years)
97%
Sequential Write 256KB
931.68
255.31
-73%
831.44
-11%
1813.29
95%
964.6
4%
1702.4
83%
950 ?(499 - 1612, n=8)
2%
1568 ?(94.2 - 4030, n=190, last 2 years)
68%
Random Read 4KB
171.2
165.98
-3%
351.47
105%
362.61
112%
331
93%
248.21
45%
232 ?(100.2 - 337, n=8)
36%
280 ?(47.6 - 504, n=190, last 2 years)
64%
Random Write 4KB
186.14
243.82
31%
132.11
-29%
49.17
-74%
384.1
106%
265.29
43%
259 ?(186.1 - 390, n=8)
39%
321 ?(9.4 - 964, n=190, last 2 years)
72%

游戏 - 大部分游戏可达到 60fps

对于Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 来说，休闲游戏和稍微老一点的游戏通常不会有问题，帧率可达 60fps，只是细节可能要稍微降低一些。但是，当涉及到当前的顶级游戏时，情况就不一样了，帧率有时会出现大幅波动，例如，《源氏冲击》也变得相当生涩，我们使用GameBench 进行了测定。.

暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø43.2 (37-45)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø36.7 (29-44)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.6.0: Ø54.4 (39-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø55.4 (37-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (32-42)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G; Diablo Immortal; 3.2.1: Ø52.2 (38-60)

排放 -Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 上的双扬声器

温度

在我们的测试过程中，红米智能手机的表面温度在任何情况下都保持不变，我们在 3DMark 压力测试中也没有发现明显的节流现象。

不过，SoC 略显平庸的性能在这里再次显现出来，因为当前的 Steel Nomad Light Unlimited 压力测试不仅耗时很长，而且耗尽了手机约 65% 的电池。

Max. Load
 38.5 °C38.6 °C37.8 °C 
 38.1 °C38.9 °C36.7 °C 
 37.1 °C37.1 °C35.4 °C 
Maximum: 38.9 °C
Average: 37.6 °C
36.1 °C37.4 °C37.6 °C
34.1 °C37 °C35.8 °C
32.9 °C36 °C35.1 °C
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 35.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +7%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93.4 %
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 % -42%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.4 % -45%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.3 %
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.9 % -43%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -47%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 %
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 % -27%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.1 % -45%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.29 (6.26-6.43)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.7 (13.1-23.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø24.1 (23.1-24.7)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63.6 (42-77.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø24.6 (24.6-24.8)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73.8 (70.8-80.4)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø17.4 (10.8-20.6)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø17.6 (7.64-20)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.65 (2.63-2.66)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.33 (7.22-10)

发言人

小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 的两个扬声器可提供不错的音效，但中音的表现力还可以再强一些，使声音整体上有点弱。不过，考虑到价格区间，这完全没有问题。

通过 USB-C 接口或蓝牙无线接口输出的声音要好得多。后者提供广泛的编解码器支持，但没有 LC3 或 Auracast。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203332.32527.527.93122.833.54026.330.45036.437.46321.134.98020.734.110019.634.212512.643.716016.351.820016.350.825013.155.931512.461.14001061.150010.867.863012.471.480011.975.5100011.678.3125012.480.5160011.678200011.378.6250011.977315012.181400013.182.9500013.177.5630013.778.8800013.374.61000013.675.21250013.770.81600014.261.1SPL24.690.6N0.685.2median 12.6median 75.2Delta1.18.927.333.426.235.525.938.429.240.335.642.325.935.822.14117.840.517.146.518.157.414.255.214.15610.758.61159.312.863.711.164.61271.111.774.71279.312.877.412.479.512.379.713.3821384.213.581.613.278.913.878.213.776.113.469.313.360.624.991.40.685.1median 13.2median 74.719.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5GSamsung Galaxy A55 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 5,110 毫安时的长续航时间

耗电量

与上一代产品相比，这款手机的功耗有所改善，但在最低显示亮度下，功耗确实应该更低。

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 完全使用数据线充电，理想情况下功率为 120 瓦。在这种情况下，充满电只需 20 分钟（50%：8 分钟，80%：13 分钟，90%：15 分钟），但必须首先激活升压功能，否则智能手机会限制充电速度，以免不必要地减少使用寿命。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.11 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.07 / 1.26 / 1.28 Watt
Load midlight 3.7 / 7.52 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
5110 mAh		Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
6000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-24%
-32%
-40%
0%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
1.07
0.92
14%
0.85
21%
1.07
-0%
1.22
-14%
1.07 ?()
-0%
0.877 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=155, last 2 years)
18%
Idle Average *
1.26
1.46
-16%
1.51
-20%
1.29
-2%
1.47
-17%
1.26 ?()
-0%
1.455 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=155, last 2 years)
-15%
Idle Maximum *
1.28
1.65
-29%
1.71
-34%
1.36
-6%
1.58
-23%
1.28 ?()
-0%
1.604 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=155, last 2 years)
-25%
Load Average *
3.7
7.96
-115%
4.87
-32%
6.14
-66%
8.09
-119%
3.7 ?()
-0%
6.79 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years)
-84%
Load Maximum *
7.52
10.74
-43%
11.73
-56%
13.94
-85%
9.49
-26%
7.52 ?()
-0%
10.2 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years)
-36%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.39 (1.069-7.71)
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.12 (0.974-9.44)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.801-1.104)
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.423 (1.01-2.23)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.15 (3.93-4.98)
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.13 (4.88-5.55)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.801-1.104)
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.423 (1.01-2.23)

运行时间

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 的续航时间非常出色，中度使用情况下可以轻松使用两天。

不过，在最低显示屏亮度下的空闲测试中，我们本以为续航时间会稍好一些，而且它的高耗电量在这里也很明显。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
23h 53min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 132)
19h 28min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 9min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
5110 mAh		Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
6000 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Neo
4310 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-5%
18%
14%
-29%
6%
Reader / Idle
1433
1803
26%
2202
54%
1980
38%
1586
11%
H.264
1109
1132
2%
1511
36%
1279
15%
937
-16%
WiFi v1.3
1168
796
-32%
1077
-8%
1183
1%
824
-29%
913
-22%
Load
249
211
-15%
220
-12%
256
3%
373
50%

Notebookcheck 总评分

小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 是一款不错的中端智能手机，但在我们看来，它的 MRSP 定得有点高。我们尤其希望它的更新周期能更长一些。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G - 02/18/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
51 / 69 → 74%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
92%
Games Performance
17 / 55 → 31%
Application Performance
61 / 85 → 72%
AI Performance
14%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
74%
Average
63%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
96.6%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
61.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 45.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 评测--配备 200 万像素摄像头的中端重磅机型
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-02-19 (Update: 2025-02-19)