Nvidia RTX 3000 Ada 性能首次亮相:戴尔Precision 5480 工作站评测
Precision 5480 直接接替了去年的Precision 5470,将第 12 代 Alder Lake-H CPU 和 Nvidia Ampere GPU 分别更新为第 13 代 Raptor Lake-H 和 Ada Lovelace 选项。它也是首批搭载 RTX 3000 Ada 的移动工作站之一。机箱或骨架与Precision 5470 相同,因此我们建议您查看 我们去年的评测了解有关Precision 5480 物理特性的更多信息。
我们的具体测试机是一款高端配置,配备酷睿 i9-13900H CPU、RTX 3000 Ada GPU 和 QHD+ 触摸屏,售价约为 4400 美元。配备酷睿 i5-13500H、集成 Iris Xe 图形处理器和非触摸式 FHD+ 显示屏的低端 SKU 也从 2300 美元起售。
14 英寸子笔记本工作站的空间相对较小,但仍有一些替代产品,包括联想 ThinkPad P14s和 惠普 ZBook Firefly 14 系列.
更多戴尔评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Dell Precision 5480 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 18.95 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 18.95 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Dell Precision 5000 5560 i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2400 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA i7-1265U, T550 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE R7 PRO 6850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 22.7 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱 - 灵感源自 XPS
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Precision 5000 5560 (AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Precision 5480 (AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 (AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Precision 5000 5560 (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Precision 5480 (AV Pro V60) |
交流
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 |
网络摄像头
戴尔仍在为其许多旗舰产品提供 720p 网络摄像头,包括 XPS 系列和基于 XPS 设计的Precision 笔记本电脑。其他制造商已经采用了 200 万像素或 500 万像素的传感器,我们希望戴尔在未来的重新设计中也能如此。
维护
配件和保修
零售包装盒中除了纸质文件和 130 W USB-C AC 适配器外,还包括与去年机型相同的 USB-C 转 HDMI 和 USB-A 适配器。戴尔还提供一个较小的 100 W USB-C AC 适配器,对于没有 Nvidia 独立显卡的配置应该足够了。
与Precision 7000 系列类似,如果在美国戴尔公司购买,三年保修期为标准保修期。
显示屏 - QHD+,全 sRGB 色彩
我们的测试机配备了与去年机型相同的友达光电 B140QAN IPS 面板。戴尔没有为今年的更新提供任何新的面板选项,这意味着全 DCi-P3 色彩或 OLED 仍然遥不可及。
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 472.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 1351:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.59
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
77.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Dell Precision 5480 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Precision 5000 5470 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Precision 5000 5560 Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 LP140WU1-SPB2, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE NE156QUM-N6C, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 17% | -11% | 15% | -6% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 77.6 | 79.3 2% | 94.9 22% | 65.9 -15% | 89.9 16% | 69.6 -10% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 94.3 -6% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 78 | 78.7 1% | 100 28% | 68.2 -13% | 99.9 28% | 71.1 -9% |
Response Times | -24% | -14% | 13% | -7% | -16% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.9 ? | 52.4 ? -19% | 47.2 ? -8% | 33.5 ? 24% | 46.7 ? -6% | 56.3 ? -28% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.3 ? | 32.4 ? -28% | 30.4 ? -20% | 24.9 ? 2% | 27.3 ? -8% | 26.2 ? -4% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -8% | -35% | -13% | -55% | -26% | |
Brightness middle | 472.8 | 537 14% | 501.5 6% | 448 -5% | 588 24% | 432 -9% |
Brightness | 469 | 518 10% | 467 0% | 422 -10% | 536 14% | 407 -13% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 94 8% | 83 -5% | 85 -2% | 83 -5% | 91 5% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.33 6% | 0.44 -26% | 0.23 34% | 0.38 -9% | 0.28 20% |
Contrast | 1351 | 1627 20% | 1140 -16% | 1948 44% | 1547 15% | 1543 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 2.97 -41% | 4.73 -125% | 2.5 -19% | 3.9 -86% | 3.1 -48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.54 | 5.33 4% | 8.45 -53% | 3.7 33% | 8.8 -59% | 5.6 -1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.59 | 0.88 -49% | 0.51 14% | 1.3 -120% | 1 -69% | 0.8 -36% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.4 -41% | 3.6 -112% | 2.9 -71% | 7.1 -318% | 4.5 -165% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.06 107% | 2.08 106% | 2.03 108% | 2.12 104% | 2 110% |
CCT | 6493 100% | 6668 97% | 6447 101% | 6840 95% | 7268 89% | 6528 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-8% | -11% /
-21% | -4% /
-9% | -16% /
-33% | -16% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器开箱后仍然校准良好,灰度和色彩 deltaE 平均值分别仅为 1.7 和 2.1。终端用户可以进行校准,但并非必需。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.6 ms rise | |
↘ 12.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise | |
↘ 24.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 第 13 代猛禽 Lake-H
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们通过戴尔优化大师将设备设置为超性能模式。与大多数其他笔记本电脑不同的是,Optimizer 电源配置文件可以与 Windows 电源配置文件同步。
内置显示屏不支持高级 Optimus、MUX 和 G-Sync。VRAM ECC 模式可通过 Nvidia 控制面板切换开启或关闭,这一点与其他工作站级 RTX GPU 的 Ada Lovelace 代非常相似。
处理器
我们的 酷睿 i9-13900H 多线程性能比 酷睿 i9-12900HPrecision 相比,多线程性能提高了 25% 至 35%。正如下面的 CineBench R15 xT 循环测试结果所示,与Precision 5470 相比,Precision 5480 的 Turbo Boost 性能更加稳定,这也是性能显著提升的原因。
对于采用酷睿 i9-13900H 处理器的笔记本电脑来说,平均性能仍然低于预期,这可能是由于Precision 5480 体积较小的缘故。较大的 Precision 5680例如,采用相同 CPU 的 5680 性能却比 5480 快 15%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=25) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=25) | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=25) | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=25) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=25) | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=25) | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=25) | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=25) | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=25) | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=25) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE |
系统性能
PCMark 分数高于我们迄今测试过的其他 14 英寸工作站。正如我们下面的 GPU 性能部分所显示的,与去年的 Ampere 选件相比,新的 RTX 3000 Ada GPU 性能优势明显。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
PCMark 10 Score | 7937 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=25) | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=25) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=25) | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (75.8 - 102.3, n=25) | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 显示了 DPC 问题。在一段长达一分钟的 4K60 视频中,我们还能记录到 2 个丢帧,这在移动工作站上是很遗憾的。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Precision 5480 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
缆线 RTX 3000 Ada比 RTX A1000快约 60% 至 80%,比去年Precision 5470 上的 RTX A1000 快约 10% 至 15%。 RTX A3000快约 10%至 15%。更新的 GPU 目标 TGP 稍高,达到 50 W,而Precision 5470 的 GPU 则限制在 40 W。
Precision 5480 上仍可配置上一代的 RTX A1000,但强烈推荐 RTX 3000 Ada,因为其性能提升显著。较新的 Ada GPU 只比较早的安培 RTX A5500工作站(如惠普 ZBook Fury 16 G9.
运行平衡模式对 CPU 性能的影响大于 GPU 性能,如下表Fire Strike 结果所示。即使在电池模式下运行,CPU 性能的差距也相对较小,只有个位数百分点。
有趣的是,SpecViewPerf 12 的两个子测试(能源和医疗)在我们的设备上总是会崩溃,因此下图中省略了这些分数。
电源配置文件 | 物理得分 | 图形得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 29061 | 20908 | 8316 |
均衡模式 | 26880 (-8%) | 20411 (-2%) | 7633 (-8%) |
电池模式 | 27852 (-4%) | 19755 (-6%) | 7569 (-9%) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 27083 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18847 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8811 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
游戏性能与运行GeForce RTX 4060 的笔记本电脑最为相似,如最近推出的 Inspiron 16 Plus 7630.我们的工作站能够很好地在 1080p 下运行《赛博朋克 2077》等要求苛刻的游戏,而原生 QHD+ 则需要较低的设置或 DLSS 才能保持帧率。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 183.2 | 177 | 164.1 | 88.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 364.1 | 242.5 | 150.1 | 78.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 175.7 | 160.8 | 151.5 | 142.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 155.1 | 108 | 78.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 152 | 126.8 | 102 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 155 | 116 | 106 | 101 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 400 | 191.3 | 160.1 | 140.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 92.3 | 72.4 | 61.2 | 56.2 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 156 | 131.4 | 88 | 69 |
F1 22 (2022) | 162.7 | 159.6 | 133.4 | 51.1 |
排放量
系统噪音
与去年的机型相比,风扇的噪音和性能并无太大变化。相当于游戏的较高负载会导致风扇噪音略高于 50 dB(A),成为市场上噪音最大的 14 英寸工作站之一。有趣的是,这一最大值在平衡模式和性能模式之间保持不变,因此在平衡模式下运行几乎不会产生噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 23.5 / 23.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39.9 / 51 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.5 dB(A) |
Dell Precision 5480 NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Dell Precision 5000 5470 RTX A1000 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA T550 Laptop GPU, i7-1265U, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, R7 PRO 6850H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X081N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 11% | 11% | 4% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 23.5 | 23 2% | 23.4 -0% | 22.9 3% | 23.6 -0% | 23.2 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 23.3 1% | 23.6 -0% | 22.9 3% | 23.6 -0% | 23.2 1% |
Idle Average * | 23.5 | 23.3 1% | 23.6 -0% | 22.9 3% | 23.6 -0% | 23.2 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.5 | 23.3 1% | 23.6 -0% | 22.9 3% | 23.6 -0% | 23.2 1% |
Load Average * | 39.9 | 48.5 -22% | 25.8 35% | 30.8 23% | 42.5 -7% | 35 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.1 | 48.6 3% | 40.1 20% | 39.4 21% | 42.5 15% | 37.9 24% |
Load Maximum * | 51 | 50.4 1% | 41.4 19% | 39.5 23% | 42.5 17% | 37.5 26% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于采用了惰性风扇,在台式机上空转时,靠近机身中心的表面温度会比平时高一些。因此,在运行要求不高的负载时,静音的代价就是较高的表面温度,这可能会或可能不会对某些用户造成困扰。
同时运行 Prime95 和 FurMark 时,机箱上下两侧的热点温度可达 40 摄氏度以上。这些热点集中在机身后部附近,因此碳纤维掌托仍然保持舒适的触感,但大部分金属底部会非常热。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
Dell Precision 5480 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Dell Precision 5000 5470 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU | Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA Intel Core i7-1265U, NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 9% | -1% | 14% | 7% | 11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 41.8 5% | 48.2 -10% | 42.7 3% | 48.7 -11% | 41.2 6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 38.2 | 36 6% | 42.6 -12% | 43.1 -13% | 50.5 -32% | 47.9 -25% |
Idle Upper Side * | 38.8 | 34.6 11% | 34.8 10% | 25.7 34% | 25 36% | 26.5 32% |
Idle Bottom * | 38.6 | 33.6 13% | 35.2 9% | 26.4 32% | 25.4 34% | 27 30% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会飙升至 3.4 GHz、88 W 和 100 C,持续时间只有几分钟。它最终会稳定在 2.4 GHz 和 51 W 左右,以保持 93 C 的核心温度。因此,最大 Turbo Boost 并不是无限的,但考虑到 14 英寸的小机身,还是相当不错的。
当运行Witcher 3 来代表高负载时,CPU 和 GPU 将分别稳定在 64 C 左右。有趣的是,在平衡模式和性能模式之间切换时,温度不会发生变化,这表明平衡模式足以应付大多数类型的工作负载。请注意,GPU 板的功耗较高,约为 45 W 至 50 W,而去年的 Precision 5470.尽管如此,在类似的游戏负载下,核心温度仍会低于去年的型号。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 59 | 52 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.5 | -- | 93 | 65 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.0 - 2.6 | 1155 | 69 - 92 | 66 - 73 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | 0.6 | 1740 | 63 | 63 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | 0.6 | 1740 | 64 | 63 |
发言人
Dell Precision 5480 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
Precision 5480 在运行要求较高的负载时比即将推出的Precision 5470 要求更高。Witcher 3举例来说,5480 的功耗约为 90 瓦,而去年型号的功耗为 83 瓦,但功耗的轻微增加与上述性能的大幅提升相比相形见绌。
有趣的是,如下图所示,在考虑任何性能节流因素后,运行 Prime95 时的功耗将是去年机型的 2 倍多(98 W 对 42 W)。因此,与图形性能的提升相比,处理器性能的逐年提升付出了更高的代价。
值得一提的是,我们的设备在桌面上闲置而不运行任何应用程序时,耗电量比预期的要高,这可能是前面提到的表面温度普遍较高的部分原因。
当 CPU 和 GPU 处于完全紧张状态时,我们可以测量到中小型(约 14.3 x 6.5 x 2.1 厘米)130 W USB-C 交流适配器的临时最大功耗为 138 W。这种高消耗率并不稳定,因为它每隔一分钟左右就会在 76 W 和 138 W 之间循环,如下图所示,这与循环时钟频率相关。
Off / Standby | 1.71 / 1.6 Watt |
Idle | 14.9 / 19.5 / 27.2 Watt |
Load |
81.6 / 137.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell Precision 5480 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Precision 5000 5560 i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE R7 PRO 6850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X081N, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA i7-1265U, T550 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 25% | 15% | 63% | 24% | 60% | |
Idle Minimum * | 14.9 | 4.3 71% | 6.2 58% | 2.6 83% | 6.3 58% | 4.2 72% |
Idle Average * | 19.5 | 8.9 54% | 13.9 29% | 5 74% | 13.9 29% | 6.5 67% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.2 | 18.9 31% | 23.8 12% | 5.6 79% | 14.5 47% | 7.2 74% |
Load Average * | 81.6 | 94 -15% | 95.7 -17% | 49.7 39% | 82.8 -1% | 47.7 42% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 90.4 | 83.2 8% | 87 4% | 50.6 44% | 88.8 2% | 42.9 53% |
Load Maximum * | 137.8 | 137.5 -0% | 132.6 4% | 61.1 56% | 124.8 9% | 68.2 51% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
WLAN 运行时间比去年的机型略长约 1 到 2 个小时,考虑到性能上的优势,这已经相当不错了。同时,从空机充电到满电需要 2 个多小时。
Dell Precision 5480 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 72 Wh | Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU, 72 Wh | Dell Precision 5000 5560 i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, 52.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3 21EM001AGE R7 PRO 6850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA i7-1265U, T550 Laptop GPU, 51 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | 29% | 14% | 32% | -19% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 655 | 573 -13% | 380 -42% | 730 11% | 416 -36% | 530 -19% |
Load | 55 | 63 15% | 110 100% | 64 16% | 110 100% | |
Reader / Idle | 883 | 722 | ||||
H.264 | 718 | 641 |
Pros
Cons
结论:RTX 3000 Ada 令人印象深刻
Precision 5480 是去年Precision 5470 的内部改进版。CPU 性能比以前更快、更稳定,而 Ada GPU 才是真正的明星,也是购买Precision 5480 而不是老款Precision 5470 的最大原因。功耗可能会稍高一些,但电池续航时间没有明显变化,对于要求苛刻的用户来说,性能的提升是非常值得的。
该系统最大的缺点可能是在踩踏板时声音很大。虽然它的单位体积性能非常高,但在如此小巧便携的机身中,所有的动力都是以风扇噪音为代价的。其他 14 英寸工作站,如
联想 ThinkPad P14s或惠普 ZBook 萤火虫 14 G9等其他 14 英寸工作站的运行噪音要小得多,但你必须牺牲大量图形处理性能。14 英寸Precision 5480 适合那些知道自己可以充分利用快速 RTX 3000 Ada GPU 的移动电源用户。否则,联想和惠普的替代产品往往运行起来更安静、更隐蔽。
Dell Precision 5480
- 09/15/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.