几乎没有比上一年更好的了:2023 戴尔XPS 13 Plus 9320 酷睿i7-1360P评测
2023 XPS 13 Plus 9320是今年对原2022型号的更新。它采用了相同的机箱设计,但用较新的第13代Raptor Lake CPU选项取代了较旧的第12代Alder Lake选项。其他方面没有任何外观变化,因此我们建议您查看 我们对2022型号的评测了解更多关于XPS 13 Plus的物理特性。
我们的配置是一款中端SKU,配备13.4英寸3.5K(3456 x 2160)OLED触摸屏和16GB快速LPDDR5 6000 MHz内存,售价约1300美元。其他SKU可能配备1200p或2400p面板,但目前均采用相同的酷睿i7-1360P处理器。
XPS 13 Plus的替代产品包括其他旗舰13英寸子笔记本,如框架笔记本13.5,惠普Spectre x360 13.5或 联想ThinkPad X13 G3.
更多戴尔评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" | 3456x2160 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.28 mm | 13.40" | 3456x2160 | |
85.9 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
86.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.9 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
通讯
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
网络摄像头
100万像素网络摄像头没有任何变化,而一些竞争机型如 惠普Spectre等竞争机型已经采用了质量更高的500万像素传感器。
维护
显示屏
有以下四种显示屏可供选择:
- 1920 x 1200、60 Hz、IPS、非触摸、哑光、500 nits
- 1920 x 1200,60赫兹,IPS,触摸,哑光,500尼特
- 3456 x 2160,60赫兹,OLED,触摸,亮面,400尼特
- 3840 x 2400, 60赫兹, IPS, 触摸, 哑光, 500尼特
我们的 OLED 配置采用了与去年 OLED SKY 相同的三星 134XK04 面板。 去年的OLED SKU因此观看体验保持一致。根据我们的体验,无论用户选择何种选项,都能获得至少99%的sRGB覆盖率。 所有三种分辨率选项.
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 361.7 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.97
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Samsung 134XK04, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4" | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED Samsung 134XK04, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4" | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U AU Optronics B133ZAN, Dell P/N: 90NTH, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE LP133WQ1-SPF2, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 SDC4160, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -25% | -20% | -20% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.7 | 99.5 0% | 63.4 -36% | 68.9 -31% | 68 -32% | 99.9 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 93.7 -6% | 97.5 -2% | 98.6 -1% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.8 | 98.4 2% | 64.3 -34% | 71.1 -27% | 69.5 -28% | 90.8 -6% |
Response Times | -32% | -1891% | -1965% | -1617% | -22% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.18 ? | 2.6 ? -19% | 51.6 ? -2267% | 54.9 ? -2418% | 45.9 ? -2006% | 1.9 ? 13% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.08 ? | 2.1 ? -1% | 33.6 ? -1515% | 33.5 ? -1511% | 27.6 ? -1227% | 2.16 ? -4% |
PWM Frequency | 238.6 ? | 59.5 -75% | 60.2 ? -75% | |||
Screen | 14% | -39% | 2% | 23% | 9% | |
Brightness middle | 361.7 | 371.8 3% | 408.2 13% | 503 39% | 438 21% | 351.7 -3% |
Brightness | 367 | 374 2% | 399 9% | 472 29% | 399 9% | 351 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 98 2% | 89 -7% | 87 -9% | 84 -12% | 87 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.29 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.83 | 2.37 51% | 4.6 5% | 3.38 30% | 1.8 63% | 1.78 63% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.34 | 6.1 35% | 11.84 -27% | 7.08 24% | 4 57% | 6.14 34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.97 | 2.03 49% | 1.21 70% | 0.8 80% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2 -11% | 7.5 -317% | 4.8 -167% | 2.8 -56% | 2.3 -28% |
Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.29 96% | 2.12 104% | 2.13 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.11 104% |
CCT | 6438 101% | 6261 104% | 7966 82% | 6235 104% | 6785 96% | 6683 97% |
Contrast | 1047 | 1397 | 1510 | |||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.5 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93.5 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-1% | -652% /
-344% | -661% /
-331% | -538% /
-261% | -5% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.98 ms rise | |
↘ 1.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 0.98 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238.6 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 238.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 238.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
脉宽调制或闪烁在大多数亮度下仍然存在。我们能够检测到从0%到52%亮度的频率为238.6赫兹,从53%亮度到最大亮度的频率为60赫兹。预计其他IPS选项不会出现任何闪烁或PWM现象。
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们通过重新设计的MyDell软件将设备设置为超性能模式。MyDell相当于XPS的Optimizer软件,许多Latitude ,因此它集成了类似的功能,如性能配置文件、充电习惯和存在检测。与大多数其他笔记本电脑不同,戴尔电源配置文件可以方便地与标准Windows配置文件同步。
处理器
第13代酷睿i7-1360P多线程性能 酷睿i7-1360P的多线程性能多线程性能几乎与第12代 酷睿i7-1280P几乎完全相同。正如下面的CineBench R15 xT循环测试结果所示,即使是Turbo Boost行为也是一样的。联想联想YOGA 9 14IRP G8在相同的测试中,采用相同酷睿i7-1360P的联想Yoga 9 14IRP G8能够在更长的时间内保持稍快的Turbo Boost时钟频率。
虽然多线程性能同比没有什么变化,但单线程性能比酷睿i7-1280P提升了大约10%到15%。不过,这预计不会对日常工作负载产生太大影响,因为大多数现代应用程序都是多线程的。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel |
系统性能
PCMark结果仅略微领先于去年的XPS 13 Plus,但持续领先个位数百分点,这可能是由于更快的内存和略快的单线程性能。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (5723 - 9597, n=16) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1527 - 1891, n=15) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1503 - 1842, n=15) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1558 - 2003, n=15) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1311 - 1899, n=15) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE |
PCMark 10 Score | 6026 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (44299 - 72748, n=16) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (44751 - 68945, n=16) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (45887 - 93331, n=16) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (85 - 110.5, n=16) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
我们的设备在打开多个浏览器标签页或主页时会出现延迟问题,即使重试多次也是如此。60FPS的4K视频播放也不完美,在我们长达一分钟的测试视频中出现了10次丢帧。这可能是新的2023型号的一个错误,因为我们的三台2022测试设备都没有出现这些问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
XPS 13 Plus系列的固态硬盘可能来自三星、美光或西部数据。对于这款特殊的设备,我们的固态硬盘是 三星PM9A1PCIe4 x4固态硬盘,其连续读取和写入速度分别接近7000 MB/s和4000 MB/s。不幸的是,正如下面的DiskSpd循环测试结果所示,我们的硬盘在受压时性能会低至2000MB/s。重复测试不会带来任何改善。相比之下,我们在2022 XPS 13 Plus上使用的相同硬盘则完全没有出现任何性能节流现象。我们不确定具体原因,因为就我们所知,SSD散热器没有发生任何变化。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
鸢尾花 Iris Xe 96 EUs尽管已推出数年,但仍是英特尔最快的集成显卡解决方案。由于显存时钟频率的小幅提升,今年的版本比去年的版本略快几个百分点,但与竞争产品 Radeon 680M或 780M.
3DMark 11 Performance | 7345 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5514 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2021 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (22.3 - 53, n=31) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (17 - 40.1, n=29) | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.6 - 24.1, n=28) | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.4 - 18.4, n=25) | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (25.9 - 67.3, n=31) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 130.6 | 105.3 | 26.6 | 11.6 | 7.35 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 86.7 | 56.1 | 33.9 | 15.4 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 125.6 | 97.7 | 68.7 | 61.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44.5 | 25.2 | 17.5 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 42.7 | 36.2 | 33.2 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 93.9 | 43.8 | 35.4 | 27.5 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 20.8 | 17.3 | 13.6 | 11 | |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 29.6 | 23.7 | 15.2 | 12.2 | |
F1 22 (2022) | 47.5 | 42.8 | 31.9 | 24.1 |
排放量
系统噪声
虽然散热方案或风扇噪音水平没有变化,但我们将耳朵贴近键盘按键时,仍能从测试设备上听到轻微的线圈啸叫。在大多数轻负载(如网页浏览或文字处理)情况下,风扇都处于空转或几乎听不到的状态。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 24.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 37 / 42 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.7 dB(A) |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1280P, WDC PC SN810 512GB | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U, SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB | Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1370P, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | -12% | -6% | -2% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 23.7 | 23.4 1% | 28 -18% | 23.2 2% | 23.22 2% | 23.5 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 23.4 2% | 28 -17% | 23.2 3% | 23.2 3% | 23.5 2% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 23.4 2% | 28 -17% | 23.2 3% | 23.2 3% | 23.5 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.4 | 23.4 4% | 28 -15% | 23.2 5% | 28.6 -17% | 23.5 4% |
Load Average * | 37 | 35 5% | 33.7 9% | 45.3 -22% | 39.8 -8% | 27 27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.1 | 41.6 1% | 47.9 -14% | 41.8 1% | 36.2 14% | |
Load Maximum * | 42 | 39.9 5% | 46.5 -11% | 49.2 -17% | 40.6 3% | 42.4 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于采用了薄型设计、Core-P CPU以及底板上没有任何通风栅,表面温度可能会非常高。热点温度可高达45摄氏度,而速度较慢的HP Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3仅为35摄氏度。 HP Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -41% | -13% | 1% | -25% | 14% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.8 | 47.6 -9% | 44.6 -2% | 38.2 13% | 52.2 -19% | 36.4 17% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.4 | 57 -28% | 49.2 -11% | 41.4 7% | 50.2 -13% | 37 17% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24 | 38.8 -62% | 28.2 -18% | 25.8 -8% | 32 -33% | 20.8 13% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.2 | 41 -63% | 30.2 -20% | 27.6 -10% | 33.6 -33% | 22.6 10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在Prime95下,酷睿i7-1360P的PL2和PL1极限与我们去年在搭载酷睿i7-1280P的XPS 13 Plus上观察到的完全相同,分别为64 W和34 W。CPU温度过高是造成上述表面温度过高的部分原因。
使用电池运行不会影响性能。使用电池进行 3DMark 11 测试的结果与使用电源时的结果基本相同。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 51 |
Prime95 Stress | 2.4 | -- | 91 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.7 | 700 | 79 |
Witcher 3 压力 | ~1.6 | 1250 | 81 |
扬声器
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
由于OLED显示屏对功耗的要求较高,台式机的空转功耗在6瓦到14瓦之间,比大多数其他超极本的功耗范围更广。我们的文章 这里在OLED面板上,某些颜色需要更多的功率,而在IPS上,功耗与颜色无关。
尽管采用了更新一代的CPU,但整体功耗与去年的型号相似。以运行Prime95为例,每套系统的功耗约为63瓦,这意味着第13代酷睿i7-1360P的每瓦性能并不比第12代酷睿i7-1280P更好。
Off / Standby | 0.35 / 0.68 Watt |
Idle | 6.9 / 7.4 / 13.6 Watt |
Load |
43.5 / 63.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4" | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN810 512GB, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4" | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -5% | 16% | 10% | 7% | 16% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.9 | 6.5 6% | 4.7 32% | 2.9 58% | 4.6 33% | 4 42% |
Idle Average * | 7.4 | 7.8 -5% | 8.3 -12% | 6.3 15% | 7.9 -7% | 4.9 34% |
Idle Maximum * | 13.6 | 13 4% | 9 34% | 9.9 27% | 8.9 35% | 12.5 8% |
Load Average * | 43.5 | 56.6 -30% | 42 3% | 56.2 -29% | 56.1 -29% | 48.1 -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 49.2 -3% | 56.6 -18% | 40.4 16% | 35.8 25% | |
Load Maximum * | 63.3 | 63 -0% | 49 23% | 60.8 4% | 66.1 -4% | 65.2 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
运行时间与去年的酷睿i7-1260P配置几乎相同,实际浏览使用时间约为7.5小时。
使用附带的适配器从空电状态充至满电状态需要2个多小时。
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 61 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G3 21AW003UGE i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52.8 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -21% | 15% | 21% | 12% | 10% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 436 | 346 -21% | 501 15% | 527 21% | 487 12% | 481 10% |
Load | 115 | 133 | ||||
Reader / Idle | 1223 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 跳过2023年版本,直接购买2022年版本
设计 XPS 13 Plus设计XPS 13 Plus的设计去年刚刚推出,因此今年的更新预计不会太大。在这个时间点上,假设机箱或内部结构有任何重大更新是不现实的,但遗憾的是,考虑到它在处理器性能或每瓦性能方面与前一年相比几乎没有任何优势,2023年的更新令人难以忘怀。此外,其他方面似乎也不一致,如视频播放时的跳帧和固态硬盘的节流。原版XPS 13 Plus 9320的所有主要优缺点仍然适用于2023版本。
第13代酷睿i7-1360P给人的感觉就像是第12代酷睿i7-1280P的翻版。因此,有兴趣的买家可能会考虑原来的2022 XPS 13 Plus 9320,而不是较新的2023版本。
如果您正在购买XPS 13 Plus 9320,那么我们建议您购买2022年的原版机型,因为它价格更低,性能与2023年的迭代机型基本相同。购买者可以将节省下来的资金投入到更实际的功能上,如更大的内存、更多的存储空间或更高分辨率的显示屏。
价格和供货情况
戴尔现在出货的XPS 13 Plus 9320基本FHD配置起价1150美元,4K UHD配置起价1750美元。
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P
- 07/16/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.