惠普 Omen 16 笔记本电脑评测:Zen 4 也是游戏玩家的不错选择
Omen 16-xf0376ng 目前的售价不到 1,900 欧元(约合 2026 美元)。在这个价格上,购买者可以获得 AMD 最先进的 Zen 4 处理器:Ryzen 7 7840HS、Ryzen 7 7840HS、Ryzen 7 7840HS。 Ryzen 7 7840HS不仅提供了强大的 CPU 性能,还配备了 Radeon 780MiGPU 的速度也相当快。不过,要求苛刻的图形计算由 GeForce RTX 4070负责。由于显存略显不足(仅 8GB GDDR6),Ada-Lovelace 加速器更偏向于中高端而非高端市场。不过,16 GB DDR5-5600 内存对于 2023 年的游戏笔记本来说还是比较合适的。显示屏为基于 IPS 的 16.1 英寸哑光面板,像素为 1,920 x 1,080 和 165 Hz。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Omen 16 的竞争对手包括其他配备 RTX 4070 的 16 英寸游戏机,如 微星隐形 16 Studio A13VG以及 技嘉 Aero 16 OLED BSF以及 宏碁 Nitro 16 AN16-41和 联想Legion Pro 5 16ARX8虽然价格更高。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.6 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 19.95 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
由于该机箱与已测试过的 16-wf000 型号基本相同,配备了 酷睿 i7-13700HX和 GeForce RTX 4080(遗憾的是 AMD 版本没有 Thunderbolt 4),我们在本文中将不再重新分析机箱、设备和输入设备,而是参考现有的 测试报告.
交流
网络摄像头
显示屏
我们评测的英特尔版本采用 QHD 显示屏(2560 x 1440 像素),而 AMD 版本则采用经典的全高清面板。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 350 cd/m²
Contrast: 1000:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.23
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.131
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng BOE0B81, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | HP Omen 16-wf000 BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1" | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 17% | 24% | -3% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 72.1 | 69 -4% | 96.4 34% | 99.9 39% | 67.9 -6% | 70.4 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 99.2 0% | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 99.1 -1% | 99.6 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.3 | 71.2 -2% | 84.8 17% | 96.4 33% | 69.9 -3% | 72.6 0% |
Response Times | 14% | 43% | 78% | 21% | 9% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.3 ? | 4.6 ? 63% | 4.4 ? 64% | 2 ? 84% | 11 ? 11% | 7 ? 43% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7.2 ? | 9.7 ? -35% | 5.6 ? 22% | 1.98 ? 72% | 5 ? 31% | 9.1 ? -26% |
PWM Frequency | 60 | |||||
Screen | 16% | -0% | 164% | 30% | 33% | |
Brightness middle | 350 | 310.9 -11% | 424 21% | 389.97 11% | 520 49% | 355.3 2% |
Brightness | 338 | 296 -12% | 411 22% | 395 17% | 494 46% | 340 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 88 -3% | 97 7% | 91 0% | 91 0% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.35 -0% | 0.37 -6% | 0.03 91% | 0.39 -11% | 0.32 9% |
Contrast | 1000 | 888 -11% | 1146 15% | 12999 1200% | 1333 33% | 1110 11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.29 | 2.18 34% | 3.04 8% | 2 39% | 1.94 41% | 1.13 66% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.47 | 3.58 58% | 7.5 11% | 4.1 52% | 5.62 34% | 2.78 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.23 | 0.52 77% | 3.04 -36% | 1.68 25% | 0.74 67% | 0.32 86% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 2.8 12% | 4.34 -36% | 2.23 30% | 2.94 8% | 1.4 56% |
Gamma | 2.131 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.32 95% | 2.41 91% | 2.37 93% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6317 103% | 6002 108% | 6952 93% | 6323 103% | 6443 101% | 6372 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
12% | 20% /
10% | 89% /
121% | 16% /
21% | 14% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
不过,确定的图像值是相似的。两款机型都能分别覆盖几乎 100% 的 sRGB 色彩空间和约 70% 的 AdobeRGB 和 DCI-P3 色彩空间,尽管一些竞争对手(微星、技嘉)在这方面表现更好。响应时间也不错,可以满足大多数需求。
照度(91%)和黑色值(0.35 cd/m²)完全相同,但 AMD 版的对比度(1000:1 对 888:1)稍好,因为亮度略高(平均为 338 cd/m²,而不是 296 cd/m²)。不过,这两款设备都无法与竞争对手相提并论。最重要的是,如果你能接受光滑的表面和显示屏闪烁,那么 Aero 16 的 OLED 面板在很多方面都要胜出一筹。
但回到 Omen 16 上:它的可视角度与典型的 IPS 面板一样好,因此即使从倾斜的位置观看,画面也相当稳定。顺便说一句,如果你需要尽可能精确的色彩,你应该进行校准或下载并使用我们在照明图旁边链接的 ICC 文件(假设它是相同的全高清面板)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 3.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.9 ms rise | |
↘ 6.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
电源
Omen 16 有多种不同的配置。调色板范围从 GeForce RTX 4050到GeForce RTX 4080。如前所述,惠普采用了 AMD 和英特尔当前的 CPU 型号。我们的评测样本在价格和性能方面都处于中(高)端水平。
测试条件
作为一款游戏笔记本,制造商在电脑上安装了大量的系统和调整软件。在 Omen Gaming Hub 中,可以对键盘背光、图形切换(混合或独立)和性能配置文件等进行调整(见截图)。由于使用性能模式时的噪音水平与(略微)更好的 3D 性能不成正比,而且设备在空闲模式下已经相当出色,因此我们在 "平衡 "模式下进行了所有测量。此外还有 "Eco "模式,但在性能和噪音方面与测试设置非常相似。
Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) Eco Balanced 性能 |
---|
帧频 ~110 fps ~112 fps ~120 fps |
噪音 ~44 dB(A) ~44 dB(A) ~55 dB(A) |
处理器
Ryzen 7 7840HS 是 AMD 的 Phoenix 系列产品,拥有 16 MB 三级缓存、5.1 GHz 最高主频和 8 个内核,由于采用了 SMT 技术,最多可并行处理 16 个线程。这款 4 纳米机型位于基准测试领域的中间位置,介于 Ryzen 7 7735HS宏碁 Nitro 16 的 Ryzen 7 735HS(仍基于 Zen 3+)和 Ryzen 7 7745HX和联想Legion Pro 5 的 Ryzen 7 7745HX。电脑 酷睿 i7-13700H(X)的电脑通常速度更快一些。这同样适用于 酷睿 i9-13900H同样适用于技嘉 Aero 16 的酷睿 i9-13900H。最重要的是,我们不得不称赞其稳定的性能。在我们的 Cinebench 循环中,Ryzen 7 7840HS 的长期性能也非常接近。
Cinebench R15 Multi-Endurance test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (24712 - 28921, n=19) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (103755 - 123167, n=19) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (4293 - 5155, n=19) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (105028 - 125820, n=19) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13857 - 15525, n=19) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (55540 - 65812, n=19) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (67389 - 177158, n=19) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (949 - 1123, n=19) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13100 - 15599, n=19) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17615 - 41516, n=19) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
系统性能
在系统性能方面,Omen 16 在对比设备中排名第二,仅次于联想的Legion Pro 5。其他制造商只为其游戏笔记本配备了 DDR5-4,800 内存,而惠普则为其 16 英寸笔记本配备了 DDR5-5,600 内存。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8167 - 8183, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10934 - 11250, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10179 - 10526, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12908 - 12920, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8167 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30937 - 72158, n=19) | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30497 - 62147, n=19) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (34590 - 93323, n=19) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (85.1 - 112, n=19) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
正如通常的情况一样,延迟让人有理由抱怨。根据 LatencyMon 工具,笔记本电脑在交付状态下不适合执行对延迟敏感的任务,如实时音频和视频编辑。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
固态硬盘并不出众。WDC 安装的 512 GB 型号固态硬盘实现了更稳定的速率,除了轻微的波动(比较 DiskSpd 循环),长期性能也很稳定,但在 AS SSD 基准测试中,Omen 16 无法与竞争对手的固态硬盘相媲美,日常使用中很少能注意到这种性能差异。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
GeForce RTX 4070 在合成基准测试中没有表现出任何弱点。根据我们的性能评级,其速度略高于之前确定的 RTX 4070 平均值。这也难怪,因为惠普赋予 Ada-Lovelace 型号最大 140 W TGP。至于 RTX 4080 的附加费用是否值得,则取决于用户:Omen 16-wf000 在 3DMarks 中几乎比 16-xf0376ng 快了 40%。得益于其 12 GB GDDR6 VRAM(并不是特别大),RTX 4080 更加面向未来。
3DMark 11 Performance | 34584 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 189312 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 66071 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 27559 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11726 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Immortals of Aveum - 1920x1080 Ultra AF:16x | |
XMG Pro 15 E23 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (46.1 - 49.9, n=4) | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (14.9 - 106.3, n=10, last 2 years) |
Armored Core 6 - 1920x1080 Maximum Preset | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
XMG Pro 15 E23 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (87.2 - 107, n=4) | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Average of class Gaming (10.7 - 107, n=14, last 2 years) |
Atlas Fallen - 1920x1080 Very High Preset | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (105.3 - 111.1, n=4) | |
XMG Pro 15 E23 | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Average of class Gaming (9.8 - 161, n=13, last 2 years) |
Sons of the Forest - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (71.1 - 87.5, n=4) | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Average of class Gaming (14.8 - 93.9, n=19, last 2 years) |
A Plague Tale Requiem - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (38 - 96.8, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54.9 - 57.5, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng |
我们测试了大约 60 分钟后的游戏性能。 的Witcher 3(FHD/Ultra)测试游戏性能。没有发现帧速率下降或其他不一致的情况。
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 177.7 | 166.8 | 105.9 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 112 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 164.1 | 149.2 | 144.1 | 137.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 141.1 | 108.7 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 121 | 103.8 | 84.8 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 277 | 221 | 190.3 | |
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) | 67.2 | 58.9 | 54.9 | |
Sons of the Forest (2023) | 88.1 | 85.8 | 85.4 | |
Atlas Fallen (2023) | 143.1 | 132.4 | 111.1 | |
Immortals of Aveum (2023) | 57.3 | 46.9 | ||
Armored Core 6 (2023) | 110.1 | 109.4 | 107 |
排放量
噪音排放
在性能模式下,Omen 16 的游戏噪音高达 55 分贝(A),而在平衡模式下,噪音发展则保持在一定范围内。44 dB(A)绝非安静,但考虑到性能,还是可以接受的。在空闲状态下,风扇有时会完全关闭。在大多数情况下,风扇的运行水平相当不错,甚至可以更低,以满足我们的口味--竞争对手在这方面往往做得更好。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 29 / 32 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44 / 46 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | 8% | -5% | 1% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 23 4% | 24 -0% | 23 4% | 25.7 -7% | 23.2 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 29.6 -18% | 24 4% | 23 8% | 25.7 -3% | 23.2 7% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 29.8 -3% | 24 17% | 23 21% | 25.7 11% | 23.2 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 32 | 30.4 5% | 24 25% | 33.64 -5% | 26.3 18% | 26.2 18% |
Load Average * | 44 | 33.8 23% | 34.81 21% | 51.49 -17% | 33.9 23% | 31.4 29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44 | 57 -30% | 44.05 -0% | 55.27 -26% | 48.4 -10% | |
Load Maximum * | 46 | 58.3 -27% | 51.57 -12% | 55.24 -20% | 62 -35% | 53.8 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑在压力情况下会发热,尤其是机箱底部。在使用 FurMark 和 Prime95 一小时后,最高温度达到 57 °C(约 135 °F),这对在膝上玩游戏是不利的。机箱上部的温度也相当高,最高达 49 °C(约 120 °F),但由于掌托区域始终保持在 40 °C(约 104 °F)以下,因此这个温度值还在可以接受的范围内。尽管如此,Omen 16 在这一类别中仍落后于竞争对手--温度更高的微星 Stealth 16 除外。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 9% | -19% | 22% | 3% | 13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 45 8% | 60 -22% | 41 16% | 41.5 15% | 41.8 15% |
Maximum Bottom * | 57 | 48.8 14% | 61 -7% | 47 18% | 51.8 9% | 41.4 27% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31 | 29.2 6% | 38.2 -23% | 23 26% | 31.6 -2% | 29 6% |
Idle Bottom * | 31 | 28.8 7% | 37.7 -22% | 23 26% | 34.5 -11% | 30.4 2% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
您不必担心元件发热致死。Ryzen 7 7840HS 在长时间满负荷运行后,主频会降至 3.3 GHz,但 82 °C(约 180 °F)左右的温度还是可以接受的。GeForce RTX 4070 的情况与之相当,略低于 78 ℃(约 172 ℉)。核心时钟频率约为 1700 MHz,这并不值得批评。
发言人
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
能源消耗
能耗方面也没有太大的惊喜。对于这样一款功能强大的笔记本电脑来说,84 至最高 176 瓦的能耗甚至相对较低,这也说明了 CPU 和 GPU 的效率。附带的 280 瓦电源也没有耗尽。在空闲模式下,Omen 16 的功耗仅为 9 至 20 瓦,而图形处理器的功耗则适中。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
Idle | 9 / 14 / 20 Watt |
Load |
84 / 176 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -75% | -13% | -12% | -22% | -31% | -38% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9 | 21.8 -142% | 11 -22% | 11.8 -31% | 11.6 -29% | 8.1 10% | 13.6 ? -51% |
Idle Average * | 14 | 26 -86% | 18 -29% | 16.1 -15% | 15.6 -11% | 15.9 -14% | 19 ? -36% |
Idle Maximum * | 20 | 36 -80% | 19 5% | 17 15% | 16.5 17% | 37.2 -86% | 26.8 ? -34% |
Load Average * | 84 | 115.5 -38% | 91 -8% | 100.6 -20% | 155 -85% | 90.9 -8% | 106.3 ? -27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 140.9 | 214 -52% | 130 8% | 158 -12% | 154.8 -10% | 189.6 -35% | |
Load Maximum * | 176 | 269.7 -53% | 228 -30% | 192 -9% | 205 -16% | 263.5 -50% | 249 ? -41% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Energy consumption with external Monitor
电池寿命
电池续航时间以英特尔版本为基础,不过在我们进行的实际 WLAN 测试中,AMD 版本的电池续航时间更长一些,亮度降低到 150 cd/m²,续航时间为 344 至 307 分钟。对于一款游戏笔记本电脑来说,不到 6 小时的续航时间还是很有用的,不过有些竞争对手的续航时间甚至更长。
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -11% | 35% | 30% | 57% | -30% | 9% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 344 | 307 -11% | 466 35% | 448 30% | 540 57% | 240 -30% | 376 ? 9% |
Reader / Idle | 328 | 661 | 729 | 392 | 567 ? | ||
Load | 68 | 142 | 126 | 105 | 61 | 85.7 ? | |
H.264 | 462 | 442 | 614 | 413 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论
Omen 16 配备了性能出色的Ryzen 7 7840HS.
这款 16 英寸机型没有犯任何明显的错误,在几乎所有类别中都至少获得了 "满意"。
在大多数类别中,它甚至可以获得 "良好 "或 "非常好 "的评价,因此我们最终获得了 87% 的可观综合评分--就像英特尔版本一样。
在积极的一面,我们要提到稳定的连续性能、165 Hz 的快速显示、稳固的扬声器和(至少在平衡模式下)可接受的噪音排放。由于噪音较大(无论空闲还是负载),我们不推荐使用性能模式。
惠普可以改进连接性(无读卡器、无 USB 4)、网络摄像头和机箱温度发展,后者高于平均水平。
RTX-4070 采用 AMD 处理器的同类笔记本电脑可在宏碁(Nitro 16 )或联想(Legion Pro 5 )等公司找到。
价格和供应情况
惠普 Omen 16-xf0376ng 配有 Ryzen 7 7840HS、GeForce RTX 4070 和 165 Hz 面板,测试时在Saturn和Mediamarkt的售价略低于 1,900 欧元(约合 2026 美元)。
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng
- 09/13/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.