Notebookcheck Logo

惠普 Omen Transcend 16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测：配备 OLED 显示屏的 RTX 4070 游戏机

强大的画面

对于 Omen 16，买家可以在 "普通 "版和所谓的 "创见 "版之间进行选择，它们在许多方面几乎没有区别。请阅读我们的评测，了解这款 16 英寸设备在竞争中的表现。
Gaming Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Geforce Intel Raptor Lake
HP Omen Transcend 16

目前，以 u1095ng 结尾的 Omen Transcend 16 评论机型的售价略低于 3000 美元。在这个价格上，购买者可以获得 酷睿 i9-14900HX与 GeForce RTX 4070由于其 8GB 的 VRAM 相当微薄，它更倾向于属于中端而非高端类别。此外还有 32 GB DDR5-5600 内存（2x 16 GB SO-DIMM）和 1 TB M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘。最大的亮点是鲜艳的 OLED 面板，据说像素为 2,560 x 1,600，频率为 240 Hz，亮度为 400 cd/m²，100% DCI P3。此外，还配备了 Windows 11 Home 操作系统。

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng (Omen Transcend 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1980 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 130 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 546.56, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, WQXGA, glossy: no, HDR, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD, one M.2 slot (in use)
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Combo (Headset/Mic)
Networking
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 356 x 269
Battery
97 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W Power Supply, Hyper X Cloud II Core Wireless Gaming Headset, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.284 kg, Power Supply: 790 g
Price
3000 EUR
Amazon
$1,459.99
Links
HP homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.4 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
92.3 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		1.8 kg16.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		2.4 kg26.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		2.5 kg26.8 mm16.00"2560x1600

案例

创见 16 的设计非常抢眼，从视觉角度来看，它的纤薄身形令人印象深刻（除了 Zephyrus G16 外，所有竞争设备都更厚）。在稳定性方面，底座至少能提供稳定的性能。相比之下，盖子--就像许多设备一样--的抗扭刚度还可以做得更好。乍一看，磨砂表面很有质感，但惠普大多只使用了塑料。在制造质量方面，没有什么可抱怨的。虽然铰链还可以做得更结实一些，但惠普 180° 的开合角度还是值得称赞的。说到重量，该设备的重量为 2.3 千克，在同类产品中处于中等水平，这使得这款 16 英寸的产品既不特别轻，也不特别重。

HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16

尺寸比较

❌
363.4 mm 260.4 mm 26.8 mm 2.5 kg358.4 mm 266.8 mm 26.1 mm 2.4 kg357 mm 269 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 269 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg354 mm 246 mm 16.4 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

特点

端口的选择可以说非常现代。背面有一个 RJ45 端口（可惜不是 2.5 Gbit LAN）、一个 HDMI 2.1 输出和一个 USB 3.0 端口（A 型），左侧有两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口（包括 Power Delivery）和一个音频插孔。右侧只有一个单独的 USB 3.0 端口（A 型）。没有 Kensington 锁和读卡器，买家也只能将就了。

左侧：2x 雷电 4 (PD)、3.5 毫米音频插孔
左侧：2x 雷电 4 (PD)、3.5 毫米音频插孔
后部：网络接口、RJ45 LAN、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.0
后部：网络接口、RJ45 LAN、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.0
右侧USB-A 3.0
右侧USB-A 3.0

交流

Wi-Fi 性能处于较高水平，发送速度接近 1,400 Mbit/s，接收数据速度约为 1,700 Mbit/s（与参考路由器的距离为 1 米），性能介于良好和非常良好之间。惠普为 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 安装了最新的英特尔无线模块。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1654 (1599min, 1600.16P1 - 1713max) MBit/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1494 (1257min - 1548max) MBit/s +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1170min - 1766max) MBit/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1411 (1327min - 1472max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)
1235 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1921, n=238)
1233 MBit/s -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1173 (839min - 1366max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1697 (849min - 1712max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1600 (1564min, 1564.87P1 - 1627max) MBit/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1583 (1176min - 1662max) MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1438 (767min - 1513max) MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)
1383 MBit/s -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=238)
1379 MBit/s -19%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1339 (1216min - 1449max) MBit/s -21%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1170-1766)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1654 (1599-1713)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1257-1548)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1216-1449)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1600 (1564-1627)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1582 (1176-1662)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)

网络摄像头

对于 200 万像素的网络摄像头，我们褒贬不一。虽然图像清晰度高于平均水平，但色彩准确度还有待提高。好在手动快门可以保护隐私。

ColorChecker
13.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: 11.02 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 23.85 ∆E

配件

我们的评测设备还配备了 230 瓦超薄电源以及 HyperX 耳机（Cloud II Core 无线耳机）。

维护

在维护方面，Omen 16 并不复杂。只需拧下六颗小十字螺丝，借助扁平工具即可将底板从固定位置抬起。在设备内部，所有重要组件都可以触及，无论是内存组、电池、M.2 插槽、风扇还是无线模块。

HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16

保修

保修期为 24 个月。

输入设备

键盘

惠普的 WASD 键是透明的，看起来很有游戏玩家的感觉。这种布局非常独特，甚至需要一些时间来适应。制造商没有选择安装数字键盘，而是为这款 16 英寸的设备配备了独立、大小合适的方向键。其他一些决定（例如电源键的位置）确实让人难以理解。打字体验一般，惠普不得不使用机械模式以获得更好的反馈。喜欢背光键的用户可以期待多种颜色。

HP Omen Transcend 16

触摸板

触控板的尺寸约为 13.5 x 8.5 厘米，在精确度、流畅度和点击区域方面都不逊色。同样，手势支持也很直观。

显示屏

说到 OLED 面板，众说纷纭。在负面影响方面，存在的几个问题是：表面反光很强（这可能会使户外使用变得困难）、屏幕在任何亮度下都会闪烁以及潜在的烧损问题。

393
cd/m²		393
cd/m²		391
cd/m²
393
cd/m²		390
cd/m²		389
cd/m²
392
cd/m²		395
cd/m²		390
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 391.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 390 cd/m²
Contrast: 19500:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.21
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.221
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16"		HP Omen Transcend 16
AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"		Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"		SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
-4%
0%
-20%
-18%
Display P3 Coverage
99.8
99.2
-1%
99.9
0%
68.3
-32%
70.4
-29%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
98.6
-1%
99.6
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
97
87.6
-10%
96.9
0%
69.6
-28%
72.6
-25%
Response Times
-8093%
222%
-4850%
-3925%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
26.4 ?(15, 11.4)
-13100%
0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11)
-10%
13.2 ?(6.1, 7.1)
-6500%
7 ?(3.2, 3.8)
-3400%
Response Time Black / White *
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6)
-14000%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
-25%
6.6 ?(2.5, 4.1)
-3200%
9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2)
-4450%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
3506 ?(100)
2822%
960 ?(60)
700%
Screen
-47%
0%
-203%
-161%
Brightness middle
390
791.1
103%
416
7%
376
-4%
355.3
-9%
Brightness
392
800
104%
418
7%
358
-9%
340
-13%
Brightness Distribution
98
95
-3%
96
-2%
88
-10%
91
-7%
Black Level *
0.02
0.04
-100%
0.33
-1550%
0.32
-1500%
Contrast
19500
19778
1%
1139
-94%
1110
-94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.94
4.37
-125%
1.6
18%
2.74
-41%
1.13
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.26
10.39
-144%
2.1
51%
6.78
-59%
2.78
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.21
1.04
75%
0.88
79%
0.32
92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
6.5
-333%
2.7
-80%
3.57
-138%
1.4
7%
Gamma
2.221 99%
2.28 96%
2.16 102%
2.4 92%
2.24 98%
CCT
6395 102%
6000 108%
6331 103%
7246 90%
6372 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2715% / -1647%
74% / 56%
-1691% / -828%
-1368% / -668%

* ... smaller is better

作为回报，OLED 技术凭借出色的黑度（接近 0.0 cd/m²）获得了极佳的对比度，这是 IPS 面板无法比拟的。视角稳定性也是如此。

卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：灰度
CalMAN：色彩饱和度
CalMAN：色彩饱和度
CalMAN: 色彩检查器
CalMAN: 色彩检查器
CalMAN：灰度（已校准）
CalMAN：灰度（已校准）
CalMAN：色彩饱和度（已校准）
CalMAN：色彩饱和度（已校准）
CalMAN：色彩校验器（已校准）
CalMAN：色彩校验器（已校准）

另外一个亮点是丰富的色彩空间：100% DCI P3 和 97% AdobeRGB 在游戏领域并非理所当然。色彩精确度方面也是如此，在校准之前就已经令人印象深刻。

HP Omen 创见 16 与 sRGB 的对比
HP Omen 创见 16 与 sRGB 的对比
HP Omen 创见 16 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen 创见 16 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen 创见 16 vs DCI P3
HP Omen 创见 16 vs DCI P3

短响应时间也值得称赞：传统的 IPS 面板只能达到 0.2 毫秒。前代产品的迷你 LED 显示屏亮度更高（800 对 392 cd/m²），但速度也明显更慢。

正面阳光
正面阳光
子像素
子像素
视角
视角

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.1 ms rise
↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.1 ms rise
↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

亮度为 100
亮度为 100
亮度为 80
亮度为 80
亮度为 60
亮度为 60
亮度为 40
亮度为 40
20 % 亮度
20 % 亮度
0 % 亮度
0 % 亮度

性能

价格方面，Omen Transcend 16 的起价约为 1600 美元。入门级机型配备了 酷睿 i7-13700HX, a GeForce RTX 406016 GB 内存和分辨率较低的 IPS 显示屏。我们的评测机型则在价格和规格上更胜一筹。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

测试条件

预装游戏集线器的性能管理有些难以进入。在相应的菜单中，有三种能源模式和一个热量管理器在等待。由于性能模式（与大多数游戏笔记本电脑类似）既能确保更好的性能，但也会产生不成比例的噪音，因此所有测量都是在平衡模式下进行的。因此，确定的数值只能在有限的范围内与前代产品进行比较。此外，风扇自动控制和图形自动切换功能都处于激活状态。

奥门游戏中心
奥门游戏中心
奥门游戏中心
奥门游戏中心
奥门游戏中心
奥门游戏中心
Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) Eco Ausgegleichen Leistung
噪音 39 dB(A) 44 dB(A) 53 dB(A)
性能 60 fps 锁定 114 fps 126 fps

处理器

与 GPU 性能和机箱厚度相比，酷睿 i9-14900HX 的尺寸几乎超标。Raptor Lake 系列 10 nm 型号提供 8 个带超线程的性能核心和 16 个不带 HT 的效率核心，总共有 32 个线程。在平衡模式下，CPU 只能在有限的范围内发挥其潜力。最好的例子就是我们的 Cinebench 循环：虽然在最初几次运行中性能相对较高，但在短时间后，分数急剧下降（但随后保持在一个稳定的水平上）。总而言之，它只能达到 Ultra 7 155H (ROG Zephyrus G16) 或 Ryzen 7 7840HS (Schenker XMG Core 16) 的水平。

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

0210420630840105012601470168018902100231025202730294031503360357037803990Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2657 (2635.57-2681.14)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
86.6 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX
79.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
75.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
69.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
66.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
61.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.2 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=34)
29130 Points +41%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
25932 (23977.8min - 25931.6max) Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)
21651 Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20702 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
18060 (17729.5min - 18059.9max) Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17267 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
17205 Points -17%
Single Core
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2182 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=34)
2157 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2105 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)
1877 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
1846 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1767 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1681 Points -23%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=34)
11084 Points +32%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
9895 Points +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8427 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7072 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6682 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6656 Points -21%
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
836 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=34)
826 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
805 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
717 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
686 Points -18%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=35)
4462 Points +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4100 (3846.15min - 4100.04max) Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3905 (2582.31min - 3904.72max) Points
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2978 (2861.03min - 2977.96max) Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2681 (2635.57min - 2681.14max) Points -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points -31%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=34)
306 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
299 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
294 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
270 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
264 Points -11%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
186 Seconds * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
174 Seconds * -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
164 Seconds *
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
123 Seconds * +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=34)
119.5 Seconds * +27%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=34)
112494 MIPS +28%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105001 MIPS +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88012 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)
84653 MIPS -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
75557 MIPS -14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
73035 MIPS -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68500 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7244 MIPS +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7142 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=34)
7017 MIPS -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6866 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6632 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)
6281 MIPS -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5439 MIPS -24%
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=34)
17369 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
16011 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years)
14171 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13323 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
13088 Points -18%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=34)
2973 Points +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2800 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2694 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years)
2641 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2410 Points -14%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=34)
19540 Points +11%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
19012 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17612 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)
14891 Points -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12905 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
12378 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
11803 Points -33%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=34)
2092 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2058 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2053 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2040 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1951 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)
1882 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points -15%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=34)
29.7 fps +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26.2 fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
23.2 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
21.6 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.9 fps -12%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
68.1 s * -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
53.1 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.6 s * +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)
47.6 s * +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
43.8 s * +18%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 85.1, n=34)
43.4 s * +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
37.9 s * +29%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4654 sec * -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)
0.4402 sec * -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4352 sec * -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
0.421 sec * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4028 sec * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3955 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=34)
0.3845 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3905 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
270 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
298 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8427 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
836 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2182 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
20702 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
95.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
79.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
29656 KRay/s +72%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27731 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=33)
25096 KRay/s +46%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23600 KRay/s +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)
21640 KRay/s +25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17244 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16431 KRay/s -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=33)
125765 Points +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120974 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118600 Points +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117390 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)
106090 Points +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88537 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85461 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=33)
6212 MB/s +46%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5888 MB/s +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4974 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4920 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)
4852 MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4267 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3814 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=33)
138709 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126954 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126217 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118405 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)
116237 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105028 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90347 Points -24%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15887 Points +30%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=33)
15369 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15189 Points +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13440 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)
13175 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12217 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10641 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64255 Points +48%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63114 Points +46%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=33)
61872 Points +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58716 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)
53471 Points +23%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43302 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41806 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=33)
137399 MB/s +58%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111789 MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)
109176 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88619 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86964 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79475 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71191 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=33)
1815 MB/s +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1689 MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)
1349 MB/s +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1265 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1147 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1099 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15975 KRay/s +74%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14776 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=33)
13525 KRay/s +47%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12891 KRay/s +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)
11654 KRay/s +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9170 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8449 KRay/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50609 MPixel/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49507 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49238 MPixel/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=33)
46637 MPixel/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39928 MPixel/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)
39919 MPixel/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
28499 MPixel/s -42%

系统性能

在系统性能方面，创见的表现不俗，但仍未跻身前列。在内存速度方面，创见稳居第二。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7866 - 8550, n=6)
8253 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8206 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8183 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
8153 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7866 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7123 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11302 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10621 - 11815, n=6)
11079 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11074 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10934 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)
10836 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10621 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10038 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10526 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9701 - 11103, n=6)
10493 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10268 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10235 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)
9878 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9735 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9208 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
13370 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13229 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=6)
13153 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12920 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
12114 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)
12030 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10612 Points -12%
CrossMark / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=5)
2179 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2027 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1970 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)
1899 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1694 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=5)
2042 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1930 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1812 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)
1801 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1629 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1624 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2287 - 2458, n=5)
2385 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2316 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2222 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)
2083 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1942 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1862 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1734 - 2330, n=5)
2028 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1785 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)
1699 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1557 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1435 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1424 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
345 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
342 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (319 - 342, n=6)
333 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
331 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=165, last 2 years)
303 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
288 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
283 Points -17%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
300 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 301, n=4)
298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
283 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=153, last 2 years)
266 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
256 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
548 ms * -25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
533 ms * -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years)
506 ms * -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
471 ms * -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
455 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (431 - 461, n=6)
443 ms * -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7866 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89414 MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78330 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77103 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=33)
74739 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67907 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)
64907 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50007 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86576 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85070 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84131 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=33)
80919 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)
68658 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60730 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50703 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84517 MB/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77579 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76244 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73337 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=33)
71949 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)
66727 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54587 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 ns * -62%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * -9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.9 ns * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 ns * -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=33)
84.8 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

与前代产品一样，新的 Omen 16 也需要应对相对较高的延迟，这可能会在某些应用场景（例如，实时处理音频和视频）中造成问题。

延迟监控
延迟监控
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2484.4 μs * -59%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1566 μs *
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1518 μs * +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
673.1 μs * +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
603 μs * +61%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

与 CPU 性能相比，我们观察到固态硬盘的性能没有下降。安装的 Kioxia 硬盘比旧创见中的 SK hynix 硬盘稍慢，但尽管如此，它仍能提供足够高的速度。遗憾的是，这款 16 英寸机型只有一个 M.2 插槽，这意味着必须更换内置的固态硬盘才能扩展存储空间。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6967 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5341 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 511.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 400.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3599 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3651 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.3 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
90 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
70.8 pt
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
 
68.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
66.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
61.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
48.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4677 (4664.17min - 4676.56max) MB/s +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)
3487 MB/s +12%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2735 - 4156, n=9)
3471 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3449 (3368.24min - 3448.79max) MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3102 (3080.64min - 3101.78max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3023 (3010.73min - 3023.25max) MB/s -3%
seq write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4326 (4313.21min - 4326.48max) MB/s +42%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (3038 - 4893, n=9)
3943 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)
3797 MB/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3637 (3591.53min - 3636.88max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3152 (3026.22min - 3152.01max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3038 (2862.26min - 3038.15max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s -17%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7137 (6595.15min - 7137.45max) MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6899 (5306.42min - 6899.46max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6660 (6017.57min - 6659.93max) MB/s +4%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (6169 - 6985, n=9)
6644 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6388 (5544.27min - 6387.72max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)
6328 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s -22%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6818 (6604.35min - 6817.63max) MB/s +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5716 (5661.68min - 5716.31max) MB/s +9%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (5144 - 5667, n=9)
5420 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5234 (5167.11min - 5234.47max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943 (4926min - 4942.6max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)
4823 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s -38%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.1 (78.57min - 80.12max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)
65.8 MB/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
64.2 (63.05min - 64.22max) MB/s +25%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (51.3 - 69.6, n=9)
59.2 MB/s +15%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
56.3 (55.9min - 56.3max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
51.3 (50.48min - 51.25max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
244 (243min - 243.65max) MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)
222 MB/s +73%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (116.4 - 219, n=9)
164.7 MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
146.3 (140.58min - 146.31max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
128.1 (123.78min - 128.05max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
127 (124.67min - 127.01max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4173 (4166.98min - 4173.4max) MB/s +364%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)
2555 MB/s +184%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (561 - 3829, n=9)
2173 MB/s +141%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1077 (1013.53min - 1077.14max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
932 (919.54min - 932.39max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
900 (832.36min - 900.34max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3552 (3546.24min - 3551.63max) MB/s +711%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)
2101 MB/s +380%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (365 - 2682, n=9)
1414 MB/s +223%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
501 (456.23min - 501.33max) MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 (405.08min - 437.5max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
413 (372.31min - 412.68max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
402 (389.17min - 402.07max) MB/s -8%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8963 Points +74%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)
6737 Points +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6291 Points +22%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (4465 - 8212, n=9)
6264 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6198 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5138 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3272 Points -36%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3449 Points +137%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)
2441 Points +67%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (1359 - 3403, n=9)
2277 Points +56%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1603 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1523 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1458 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1020 Points -30%
Score Write
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4064 Points +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3832 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3812 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)
3113 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3029 Points
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2518 - 3244, n=9)
2908 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1808 Points -40%
Seq Read
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5625.54 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5621.18 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5588.41 MB/s -1%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (5197 - 5837, n=9)
5560 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)
4944 MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4362 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3662 MB/s -35%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4010.3 MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3875.81 MB/s +8%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2824 - 5175, n=9)
3759 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)
3720 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3587.95 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3376 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1921 MB/s -46%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.46 MB/s +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
61.2 MB/s +23%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (49.8 - 65.6, n=9)
59.3 MB/s +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
54.59 MB/s +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
49.79 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
42.2 MB/s -15%
4K Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
211.54 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
191.79 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (147.9 - 224, n=9)
189 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
181.9 MB/s -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
177.87 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
157.9 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2813.87 MB/s +233%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)
1876 MB/s +122%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (773 - 2766, n=9)
1661 MB/s +96%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1105 MB/s +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
909.92 MB/s +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
845.48 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
612 MB/s -28%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3498.72 MB/s +41%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3293 MB/s +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3219.74 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)
2533 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2478.06 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2083 - 2535, n=9)
2344 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1458 MB/s -41%
Access Time Read
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (0.037 - 0.126, n=9)
0.07367 ms * -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)
0.05509 ms * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.054 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.032 ms * +41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.031 ms * +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.023 ms * +57%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.022 ms * +59%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.064 ms * -220%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.054 ms * -170%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)
0.04843 ms * -142%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (0.018 - 0.071, n=9)
0.03678 ms * -84%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.023 ms * -15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.022 ms * -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.02 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6318 (5640.08-6341.89)
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø6898 (5515.51-6944.88)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4947 (4458.34-4961.59)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7119 (6237.25-7138.29)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6087 (3287.84-6658.98)

图形卡

GeForce RTX 4070 基于 Ada Lovelace 架构，就性能而言，它比 RTX 4080 更接近 RTX 4060。 RTX 4080.尽管 TGP 达到了 130 瓦，但 Omen 16 在基准测试中的表现略低于平均水平，不过与竞争对手的差距有时非常小。由于 VRAM 容量较低，RTX 4070 的面向未来能力相当差。在某些游戏中，8 GB 可能已经成为限制因素。在我们看来，Nvidia 应该至少提供 12 GB 的 GPU，尤其是这种笔记本电脑并不便宜。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
93.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
93.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
88.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
45606 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41090 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=59)
40410 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39424 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
38784 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
37313 Points -5%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
169253 Points +51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54238 - 193851, n=24)
148053 Points +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
112162 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
32810 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
30936 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=62)
29041 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
28461 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27343 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
26568 Points -7%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13040 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12617 Points +13%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11960 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=60)
11603 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11181 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10989 Points -2%
3DMark 11 Performance
32528 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
53528 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23683 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11682 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
23 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
22 Seconds * +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=60)
21.5 Seconds * +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)
21 Seconds * +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
20 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
19 Seconds * +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
19 Seconds * +17%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=63)
40.6 Seconds * -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
36.7 Seconds * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
36 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
36 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
34 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
33 Seconds * +8%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
32 Seconds * +11%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
330 Seconds * -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
298 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)
297 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=59)
290 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
277 Seconds * +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
222 Seconds * +26%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

创见 16 的速度足够快，几乎可以在原生 2,560 x 1,600 分辨率和高至最高设置下玩所有游戏。只有在要求极高或优化不佳的游戏中才会出现问题，例如 笼罩.对于 4K 显示器，我们建议至少使用 RTX 4080。

Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
96.2 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
93.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
92 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
88.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
87.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
86 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
71.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
120 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
119.8 (114min) fps +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
114 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=55)
112.2 fps -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
111.8 (102min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
98.6 (94min, 94P1) fps -14%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
119.9 (3.81min, 76.9P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
116.1 (4.31min, 83.3P1) fps 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
115.8 (21.8min, 83.3P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)
113 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 140.5, n=55)
110.9 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
98.8 (3.78min, 58.8P1) fps -15%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
124.8 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
119.9 fps +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)
119 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 131.9, n=57)
111 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
108.3 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
100.8 fps -7%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)
227 fps +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
223 (89min, 167.8P1) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
218 (57.2min, 162.5P1) fps +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
208 (60.7min, 153.8P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (76.3 - 234, n=58)
196.1 fps +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
194.2 (59.2min, 144.5P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
129.3 (30.4min, 84.7P1) fps -33%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
182 (152.8min) fps +18%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
168.4 (146.6min) fps +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
154.1 (133.3min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)
149.3 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 187.5, n=59)
147.6 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
134.8 (119.8min) fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
131.6 (114.5min) fps -15%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
132.9 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
117.8 fps +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
114.9 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)
107.2 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (58.9 - 144.4, n=61)
104.6 fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
85.5 fps -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
81.2 fps -29%
Enshrouded | Palworld | Prince of Persia The Lost Crown | Ready or Not | The Finals
Enshrouded - 2560x1440 Max. Quality AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (25.3 - 76, n=6, last 2 years)
55 fps +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
42.3 (24.7min, 28.4P0.1, 30.5P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (38.9 - 42.3, n=2)
40.6 fps -4%
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
38.9 (26.5min, 28.9P0.1, 30.1P1) fps -8%
Palworld - 2560x1440 Epic Preset AA:TSR
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
81.3 (33.5min, 35.1P0.1, 56.1P1) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (39.4 - 119.8, n=3, last 2 years)
76.1 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.1 - 81.3, n=2)
75.2 fps +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
69.1 (19.7min, 22P0.1, 49.9P1) fps
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:SM
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
354 (18.9min, 190.3P0.1, 305P1) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (325 - 354, n=2)
340 fps +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
325 (13.8min, 53.2P0.1, 210P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (35.3 - 355, n=4, last 2 years)
235 fps -28%
Ready or Not - 2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (53.2 - 144.3, n=5, last 2 years)
99.4 fps +17%
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
95.6 (20.2min, 38.9P0.1, 55.1P1) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (84.8 - 95.6, n=2)
90.2 fps +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
84.8 (20.1min, 21.4P0.1, 51.1P1) fps
The Finals - 2560x1440 Epic Preset
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
94.6 (58.2min, 65.2P0.1, 71.9P1) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (82.8 - 94.6, n=3)
90.2 fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.2 - 147.4, n=7, last 2 years)
85.2 fps +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
82.8 (50.1min, 52.1P0.1, 61.1P1) fps

我们使用了角色扮演游戏、 游戏Witcher 3(全高清/超高清）来查看 3D 性能在较长时间内的表现，即使在大约一个小时后，帧速率仍然非常稳定。

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.2 (109-118)
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.7 (97-112)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø98.6 (94-104)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.4 (110-125)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø112.3 (106-121)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 181.2 175.3 115.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 114
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 202 178.9 167 154.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 147.5 108.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 166.6 141.7 114.9
Strange Brigade (2018) 272 220 194.2
The Finals (2023) 168 130.2 82.8
Ready or Not (2023) 194.2 134 84.8
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) 358 358 325
Palworld (2024) 102.2 96.6 69.1
Enshrouded (2024) 66.6 56.5 42.3
Helldivers 2 (2024) 91.5 91.1 69.2

排放量

噪音排放

如果只使用平衡模式，16 英寸设备的声音不会太大。44 至 47 分贝（A）的 3D 噪音水平可以听到，但并不令人讨厌（后者适用于录音超过 50 分贝的性能模式）。在空闲模式下，风扇持续工作，噪音为 29 至 31 dB(A)，并不理想。

Noise Level

Idle
29 / 30 / 31 dB(A)
Load
45 / 47 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.441.835.539.938.62535.437.336.635.638.23148.746.244.244.245.74034.730.128.630.734.25030.529.230.429.131.46333.626.624.723.834.18028.621.819.614.930.410025.519.418.61625.412526.319.718.215.529.316027.820.519.617.730.220030.324.722.118.331.325027.119.817.716.131.23152818.818.311.93040029.51917.81133.150032.219.21811.933.763032.117.717.611.533.580032.117.517.212.234.3100034.719.118.911.436.4125035.719.41911.137.416003519.118.910.837.1200035.319.619.611.537.3250034.718.318.211.936315034.716.215.712.936.2400032.915.515.212.934.9500028.414.714.113.130.5630027.114.513.613.128.980002514.113.613.127.31000022.214.313.612.624.31250017.713.61312.418.51600016.313.412.511.715.5SPL45.129.729.324.546.9N4.91.21.10.65.7median 29.5median 18.8median 17.8median 12.4median 31.3Delta3.91.81.91.53.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise
-4%
7%
5%
10%
off / environment *
24
22.9
5%
23.9
-0%
23
4%
23.2
3%
Idle Minimum *
29
29.1
-0%
23.9
18%
23
21%
23.2
20%
Idle Average *
30
29.1
3%
27.8
7%
28.48
5%
23.2
23%
Idle Maximum *
31
29.1
6%
30.1
3%
28.48
8%
26.2
15%
Load Average *
45
45.7
-2%
34.2
24%
30
33%
31.4
30%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44
54.3
-23%
46.4
-5%
54.12
-23%
48.4
-10%
Load Maximum *
47
54.3
-16%
46.4
1%
54.12
-15%
53.8
-14%

* ... smaller is better

温度

虽然笔记本顶部的温度在同类产品中处于中等水平，但在负载情况下，机箱底部的温度却高于同类产品。最高 63 °C（游戏时）会使用户无法将设备放在膝盖上使用。而在空闲运行时，情况则要舒适得多，机箱最高温度保持在 30 °C，凉爽宜人。

Max. Load
 47 °C49 °C45 °C 
 43 °C46 °C42 °C 
 31 °C34 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 41.1 °C
62 °C63 °C53 °C
49 °C49 °C41 °C
36 °C37 °C34 °C
Maximum: 63 °C
Average: 47.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  50 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
5%
6%
4%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
47.4
3%
50.3
-3%
46
6%
41.8
15%
Maximum Bottom *
63
54.4
14%
48
24%
44
30%
41.4
34%
Idle Upper Side *
30
28.4
5%
28.8
4%
32
-7%
29
3%
Idle Bottom *
29
29.2
-1%
29.8
-3%
33
-14%
30.4
-5%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，60 分钟后，CPU 稳定在 85 °C左右，而 GPU 则达到 81 °C（热点为 88 °C）--这两个数值都相对较高，但并无大碍。

Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

发言人

音质略好于整体游戏笔记本电脑的平均水平，不过，正如通常的情况一样，低音不够强劲，还可以更有力、更精确。最大音量为 82 dB（A），还算不错。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.842.62536.639.43143.141.1403133.75041.743.26325.831.28026.827.810029.526.312529.134.216023.642.720022.253.32502258.531516.260.940012.967.350012.768.163013.971.280011.673.5100011.368.8125011.170.6160011.374.3200011.873.7250011.968.931501366.1400013.266.8500013.267.9630013.171800013.265.91000013.168.31250012.768.61600012.162.6SPL25.882.4N0.855.7median 13.1median 67.9Delta3.15.536.143.62639.829.441.436.64732.638.426.743.323.85022.461.62166.118.963.618.269.322.972.717.27213.772.711.971.211.472.710.372.510.3719.674.19.575.4107410.469.410.769.611.266.511.566.411.765.511.768.411.865.111.76211.259.723.983.30.661.9median 11.7median 69.42.73.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ngAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量

能耗要求与该性能类别中的标准值相似。闲置时的能耗为 10 至 32 瓦，负载时的能耗为 128 至 242 瓦，既不算高，也不算低。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 10 / 18 / 32 Watt
Load midlight 128 / 242 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-42%
33%
12%
1%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
10
19.2
-92%
8.3
17%
11
-10%
8.1
19%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years)
-35%
Idle Average *
18
22.7
-26%
12.5
31%
15.2
16%
15.9
12%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Maximum *
32
55.4
-73%
12.8
60%
16
50%
37.2
-16%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years)
17%
Load Average *
128
128.4
-0%
71.3
44%
64
50%
90.9
29%
106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years)
17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
148.4
206
-39%
127.5
14%
179
-21%
189.6
-28%
Load Maximum *
242
292
-21%
169.1
30%
280
-16%
263.5
-9%
249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø148.4 (143.6-156)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø186.1 (161-242)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.2 (10.5-31.9)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø110 (93.2-197)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø159.9 (158.2-163.7)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø137.2 (134-145.6)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø142.9 (132.4-150.1)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.3 (11.5-34.3)

电池寿命

说到电池模式下的能耗要求，惠普还有一些工作要做。尽管配备了强劲的 97 Wh 电池，但在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，在亮度降低至 150 cd/m² 的情况下，这款 16 英寸的机器仅能坚持不到 5 个小时。作为对比：ROG Zyphrus G16 的续航时间超过了 7 小时，XMG Core 16 甚至超过了 8 小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
4h 52min
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh		HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh		Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh		SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh		Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-14%
49%
72%
-18%
29%
WiFi v1.3
292
250
-14%
435
49%
501
72%
240
-18%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years)
29%
Reader / Idle
375
392
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
Load
73
71
143
61
85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
H.264
671
609
408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

Pros

+ OLED 的优势：响应时间、对比度、视角
+ 不错的扬声器
+ 2x 雷电 4
+ 隐私快门
+ 高速 Wi-Fi

Cons

- 酷睿 i9-14900HX 性能有限
- OLED 的缺点：闪烁、表面光滑
- 对于 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑来说相当昂贵
- 电池续航能力有待提高
- 只有一个 M.2 插槽

判决

奥门创见 16-u1095ng：评测设备由德国惠普公司提供
奥门创见 16-u1095ng：评测设备由德国惠普公司提供

首先，Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng 试图通过绚丽的 OLED 显示屏吸引潜在客户，这对游戏玩家和创作者都有好处。

如果你能接受反射率很高的屏幕，并且对闪烁没有意见，那么你就能得到一个色彩艳丽、对比度极高、响应时间极快的显示屏，而且黑度和可视角度都很出色。

排放和速度方面有一些减分项。在性能模式下，16 英寸机器的噪音令人不快，而平衡模式的性能似乎低于平均水平。除此之外，Omen Transcend 16 在外壳质量、输入设备和端口选择方面与其他游戏笔记本电脑相似。

总体而言，总分与 XMG 酷睿 16 L23或 Legion Pro 5 16ARX8.如果您想在 16 英寸产品中寻找一款特别轻巧的设备，不妨考虑一下新的 ROG Zeyphrus G16.

价格和供应情况

在我们进行评测时，搭载酷睿 i9-14900HX 和GeForce RTX 4070 的 HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng 目前在惠普在线商店、亚马逊或百思买均无货。

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng - 02/12/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
67 / 80 → 83%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Battery
63 / 95 → 66%
Display
94%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
97%
Temperature
80 / 95 → 84%
Noise
76 / 90 → 85%
Audio
78%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Average
77%
88%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Omen Transcend 16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测：配备 OLED 显示屏的 RTX 4070 游戏机
Florian Glaser, 2024-02-15 (Update: 2024-02-15)