Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

OnePlus Nord 4 智能手机评测 - Unibody 一体成型机身,价格低廉,令上流社会怦然心动

一个真正的金属头

OnePlus Nord 4 拥有高品质的金属外壳、大容量电池和快速充电功能,尽管它的售价已经低于 500 欧元(约合 553 美元),但它已经具备了威胁旗舰智能手机的实力。不过,新的 SoC 可能会搅局,因此我们将在测试中进行更详细的了解。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone

欢迎回来,OnePlus!在该制造商因专利法案件败诉而较长时间无法在德国开展业务之后,现在又有更多的设备可以买到了,OnePlus Nord 4 这款非常有趣的智能手机已经上架。

作为一款高品质的中端智能手机,它可能也会吸引一些高端买家--至少它看起来足够漂亮,而且设备也具有很高的品质。

我们已经称这款手机为 一加诺德 3Nord 2在我们的测试中,我们已经称 OnePlus Nord 3 是 "与 Nord 2 相比令人印象深刻的进步",现在我们将详细看看 OnePlus Nord 4 是否成功地实现了又一次飞跃。

OnePlus Nord 4 (Nord Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 8 x 1.9 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4, A720, A520
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 732, Core: 950 MHz
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.74 inch 20:9, 2772 x 1240 pixel 451 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 495 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 162.6 x 75
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 100 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison AF, contrast AF, OIS, dual LED flash, videos @2160p/​60fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.4, videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charging cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP65 certified, fanless
Weight
199.5 g
Price
549 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
80.9 %v8
09 / 2024
OnePlus Nord 4
SD 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732
199.5 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.74"2772x1240
88.2 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
OnePlus Nord 3
Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10
193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.74"2772x1240
87.6 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
SD 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720
186 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"2712x1220
87.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530
213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080
81.9 %v8
07 / 2024
Google Pixel 8a
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7
188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080

外壳 - 一体成型的出色外壳

OnePlus Nord 4 的三种颜色版本。
OnePlus Nord 4 的三种颜色版本。

OnePlus Nord 4 有三种颜色版本。我们测试机的颜色称为 "绿洲绿",介于绿色和蓝色之间,拥有光滑的后盖。你还可以买到黑曜石午夜(Obsidian Midnight)和水银银(Mercurial Silver),黑曜石午夜是一种简单的深灰色,后盖也是光滑的;水银银是一种金属色版本,后盖呈波纹状。

顶部的四分之一采用玻璃覆盖,内置两个相机镜头。背面的其余部分和边框由一整块铝材碾压而成,看起来非常优雅。

这款智能手机的结构非常稳定,做工也非常简洁,给人的第一印象就是高品质。智能手机不会受到手指的压力,也不会被双手翘起。Nord 4 通过了 IP65 认证,防尘能力相当强,即使下大雨也不会有任何问题,但不能浸入水中。

正面的边框非常纤薄,发货时还贴有屏幕保护盖。考虑到它的尺寸,OnePlus Nord 4 并不算太重,不到 200 克(约 7 盎司),不过也有明显更轻的手机,如 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro.它的尺寸也达到了同类产品的水平,仅 8 毫米(约 0.3 英寸)的机壳厚度尤其令人印象深刻。

尺寸比较

162.6 mm 75.1 mm 8.1 mm 193.5 g162.6 mm 75 mm 8 mm 199.5 g161.2 mm 72.4 mm 8.2 mm 186 g161.1 mm 77.4 mm 8.2 mm 213 g152.2 mm 72.7 mm 8.9 mm 188 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 可选择配备大量存储设备

OnePlus Nord 4 有两个存储版本:

  • 256 GB 存储空间/12 GB 内存 - 499 欧元(约合 552 美元)
  • 512 GB 存储器/16 GB 内存 - 549 欧元(约合 607 美元)

其中,256 GB 版本的价格与前代产品持平,而新的更大存储版本只需额外支付 50 欧元(约合 55 美元)即可获得。另一方面,价格更实惠的 128GB 存储版本将不再供应,因此 OnePlus Nord 4 的最低价格比 OnePlus Nord 3 高出 50 欧元。 一加 Nord 3.

它的红外线爆破器还可以将智能手机用作其他设备的遥控器。此外,还包括用于移动支付或数据传输的 NFC 功能。不过,USB-C 端口在内部只能按照 USB-2.0 标准连接,所以你只能忍受没有显示输出或更快的数据传输。

另一个缺乏的功能是 eSIM 支持,而且也没有 microSD 插槽,但无论如何,OnePlus 传统上对此并不看好。

底部SIM 卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
底部SIM 卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
顶部:麦克风、红外线传感器
顶部:麦克风、红外线传感器
右:待机键,音量摇杆
右:待机键,音量摇杆
左:通知键
左:通知键

软件 - 不幸的是,预装了臃肿的软件

OnePlus 使用其内部的 OxygenOS 14.1,在过去几代中,它让我们强烈地想起了 ColorOS。这是其母公司 NNK Electronics 的操作系统,该公司旗下拥有 realme、Vivo 和 Oppo 等公司。该操作系统基于Android 14,打上了 2024 年 7 月的安全补丁,在本次测试时仍相当及时。

制造商承诺提供四次Android 更新,直至Android 18 和 6 年的安全更新。此外,它还获得了(德国)TÜV 认证,证明该设备在 6 年后仍能流畅运行。

您必须使用几个预装的第三方广告和游戏应用程序,但您也可以轻松卸载它们。

可持续性

OnePlus Nord 4 相当长的软件更新周期已经为其可持续发展评级赢得了一些积极的分数。包装由纸板制成,没有使用大量塑料,包装盒上的印刷也使用了大豆油墨而不是油墨。

遗憾的是,OnePlus 自 2020 年以来就没有发布过任何可持续发展报告,这使得该公司的努力显得不太可信。目前还没有关于智能手机生产过程中二氧化碳排放量或生命周期的数据。

官方零部件供应商的链接很难找到,我们只能通过搜索引擎找到。目前,虽然 OnePlus Nord 4 已被列入其数据库,但还没有配件可用。

目前还没有在线维修手册。ifixit.com维修社区只提供旧设备的维修说明,因此似乎与制造商没有官方合作。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 无 6 GHz 无线局域网

OnePlus Nord 4 支持 WiFi 6 作为其最快的标准,所以你必须使用较少使用、因此通常更快的 6 GHz 频段进行无线网络连接。由于 SoC 已经支持 WiFi 7,制造商特意选择放弃支持更现代的标准。

在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 路由器进行的测试中,接收速度相当稳定,保持在 900 Mbit/s 左右。虽然这可以让你很好地利用千兆互联网连接,但在这个价位的智能手机中,也有速度更快的内部网络数据传输产品。

在靠近路由器的地方可以完全接收到信号,但在 10 米(约 33 英尺)的距离和穿过三面墙时,只能获得一半的信号强度,加载网站的时间也比靠近路由器时长得多。

智能手机在移动网络中能够使用的 4G 和 5G 频段的通信数量并不令人满意。OnePlus Nord 4 可以在世界各地使用。

我们通过反复随机对比高端手机的信号质量,对这款智能手机的信号接收情况进行了仔细观察。OnePlus Nord 4 在这方面做得很好,其表现往往与更昂贵的智能手机处于同一水平。

Networking
OnePlus Nord 4
iperf3 receive AXE11000
893 (min: 779) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
533 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼36%
OnePlus Nord 3
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1581 (min: 1484) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1488 (min: 1308) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1600 (min: 1384) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1081 (min: 838) MBit/s ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼49%
Google Pixel 8a
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
856 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
521 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
754 (min: 611) MBit/s ∼54%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø893 (779-923)
OnePlus Nord 4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø533 (459-678)
户外 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

在室外,OnePlus Nord 4 可以快速定位我们的位置,精确度高达 3 米(约 10 英尺)。它支持所有大型卫星网络,但不支持 SBAS,而 SBAS 可以提供更高的精确度。

我们还进行了实际测试,带着智能手机骑自行车,同时还带上 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表进行比较。OnePlus Nord 4 在这里显示出了良好的定位精度,但在树林中骑行时,显示的路线偏离了我们的实际路线,在城市中也不总是显示在道路的右侧。

对于那些不需要绝对定位精度的用户来说,OnePlus Nord 4 的导航功能应该可以满足他们的需求。

OnePlus Nord 4 定位 - 概述
OnePlus Nord 4 定位 - 概述
OnePlus Nord 4 定位 - 转折点
OnePlus Nord 4 定位 - 转折点
OnePlus Nord 4 定位 - 城市
OnePlus Nord 4 定位 - 城市
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 城市
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 城市

电话功能和语音质量 - 水晶般清晰

在拨打电话方面,OnePlus 使用的谷歌应用程序对于许多其他Android 手机的用户来说应该不会陌生。它能自动识别商务来电,并提供所有重要的通话功能。您也可以选择用其他电话应用程序来代替它。

我们非常喜欢它的通话质量,我们的通话对象听起来非常清晰。如果有必要,您还可以用相当大的音量来听,不过周围的人也能听到听筒里传来的声音。据我们的对话伙伴说,我们自己的声音也听起来非常清晰。

通过免提电话聆听我们的对话伙伴时,其声音听起来也非常清晰,而我们自己的声音也能清晰地传递,即使说话时声音稍低也是如此。

摄像头 - 传感器内变焦和 4K 视频

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

在相机系统方面,OnePlus 与前代产品相比去掉了一个镜头。尽管缺少 200 万像素微距摄像头并不是很大的损失,但这也意味着你很难再拍到清晰的特写镜头了。

其余摄像头没有任何变化。主摄像头采用 5000 万像素传感器,同时支持光学防抖功能。它通常能拍摄出 1250 万像素的图像,只有使用特殊模式才能获得全分辨率。

使用主摄像头拍摄的照片看起来非常清晰,拍摄物体时的虚化效果也非常可信。在拍摄周围环境时,细节可以稍微清晰一些,但我们也喜欢这样的整体质量。2 倍感光元件内变焦功能再次可用,即使用感光元件的全部分辨率拍摄照片,然后剪切到选定的图像部分。虽然这种变焦方式的图像质量比纯数字变焦要好得多,但由于变焦级别较低,因此很少能派上用场。

在弱光和高对比度条件下,主摄像头的表现较为平庸:一方面,烛火的照片看起来不错,图像不会变得太暗,但同时暗部的细节也不再清晰可见。

视频可以 60 帧/秒的 4K 分辨率录制。图像质量非常吸引人,色彩还原准确,清晰度高。自动对焦的响应速度也很快,而且不明显。

800 万像素的超广角摄像头能很好地照亮景物,尽管照片的细节水平不是很准确。

前置的 1600 万像素自拍摄像头也能拍出清晰的照片,而且不会被所描绘物体的亮度差异所迷惑。如果放大照片,你会看到一些轻微的模糊,在非常暗的地方细节可能会更好。但总体而言,我们喜欢这款手机的自拍效果。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

PflanzeUmgebungLow LightUltraweitwinkelkameraNahaufnahme

主相机还必须在实验室中证明自己的实力,我们在全棚光和单勒克斯照明条件下拍摄了照片。在光线充足的条件下,对比度可能会更好,清晰度也处于中等水平。

在光线非常暗的情况下,物体仍然清晰可辨,但清晰度明显下降。

ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord 4: 8.5 ∆E min: 2.14 - max: 14.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
26.6 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
27 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord 4: 33.34 ∆E min: 13.67 - max: 47.72 ∆E

配件和保修 - 大量配件可供购买

除智能手机本身外,包装盒内还包括一根标志性红白设计的 USB 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具。在本次测试期间,直接从 OnePlus 在线商店(德国)订购智能手机的用户还将获得一个免费充电器。

OnePlus 在其网站上提供大量配件,包括 40 至 60 欧元(约合 44 至 66 美元)的充电器。您还可以以 60 欧元(约合 66 美元)的价格获得一个用于汽车点烟器的充电器。合适的砂岩设计外壳,让人联想起 OnePlus One或芳纶纤维的保护套,价格为 23 至 40 欧元(约合 25 至 44 美元)。

OnePlus 为其智能手机提供一年保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 可靠的控制

120Hz 的屏幕对输入(包括边角输入)的响应非常迅速和准确。

手机壳的左侧是一个物理通知滑动键,可以快速将智能手机静音或取消静音。右侧的按键可以控制音量或打开或关闭手机。所有按键均由金属制成,使它们看起来更有质感。按键的压感也非常清晰。

指纹传感器位于显示屏下方,位置相当靠下,这使得手小的用户也能轻松触及。它能可靠地解锁手机,几乎没有任何延迟。

您还可以通过人脸识别功能解锁手机,在初始设置后,该功能可以非常可靠地工作。不过,由于没有红外线传感器来进行更精确的人脸识别,这种方法的安全性稍差,不容易被人操纵。

键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向

显示屏 - 非常明亮,分辨率高

子像素网格
子像素网格

OnePlus Nord 4 的屏幕对角线为 6.7 英寸,显示屏相当大。AMOLED 屏幕具有 2772x1240 像素的高分辨率,可呈现高水平的细节,几乎无法用肉眼察觉到任何单个像素。

在亮度方面,全白色显示屏的亮度超过 1,100 cd/m²,效果也非常出色。在较小的区域(APL18),我们测得的亮度更高,达到 1,345 cd/m²。

我们注意到 PWM 闪烁,频率为 119.2 Hz,接近刷新率。变化幅度约为 12%,仍在可接受范围内。不过,敏感用户还是应该在购买智能手机前试用一下显示屏,以确保闪烁不会给他们带来任何问题。

1083
cd/m²
1078
cd/m²
1125
cd/m²
1091
cd/m²
1102
cd/m²
1127
cd/m²
1076
cd/m²
1093
cd/m²
1144
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1144 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1102.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.96 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1102 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.213
OnePlus Nord 4
AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"
OnePlus Nord 3
AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Google Pixel 8a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"
Screen
-20%
10%
7%
19%
Brightness middle
1102
481
-56%
1064
-3%
962
-13%
1518
38%
Brightness
1102
478
-57%
1038
-6%
967
-12%
1466
33%
Brightness Distribution
94
91
-3%
88
-6%
99
5%
88
-6%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.43
1.4
2%
1.17
18%
1.6
-12%
1.2
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.04
3.87
4%
2.47
39%
2.6
36%
3.3
18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
2.6
-8%
2
17%
1.5
37%
2
17%
Gamma
2.213 99%
2.28 96%
2.238 98%
2.13 103%
2.2 100%
CCT
6385 102%
6395 102%
6423 101%
6382 102%
6786 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119.2 Hz
Amplitude: 12 %

The display backlight flickers at 119.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

在固定变焦级别和各种亮度设置下的测量系列

显示屏在色彩和灰度方面的准确性总体上相当不错,但全白显示时黄色色调极少。

显示屏的响应时间一般,这对于铁杆游戏玩家来说并不令人信服。但对于所有其他用户来说,显示屏的响应速度应该足够快。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9 ms rise
↘ 9.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在室外,明亮的天气也能轻松阅读显示屏,但阳光直射仍会产生一些较强的反光。

从各个角度看,可视角度都是最佳的。虽然亮度最多会有一些微小的变化,但显示内容始终清晰易读。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 处理能力一般,但图形处理性能很高

配备 高通骁龙 7+ Gen3,制造商采用了全新的 SoC,我们还没有在其他智能手机上测试过。与 联发科 Dimensity 9000相比 OnePlus Nord 3的联发科 Dimensity 9000 相比,新的 SoC 在处理器性能方面无法给人留下深刻印象,速度明显较慢,尤其是单核性能。

如果我们看看这个价位的所有对比设备,我们的测试机处于中间位置。尤其是像 谷歌 Pixel 8a等智能手机表明,大幅提升性能也是可能的。人工智能计算的性能也低于许多对比设备。

在日常操作中,你仍能获得基本流畅的系统,只有要求非常高的应用程序才会导致智能手机卡顿。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1699 Points +45%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1608 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points +28%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
1168 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
1168 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1147 Points -2%
Multi-Core
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
4482 Points +16%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4408 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points +8%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
3865 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
3865 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
3129 Points -19%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1267 Points +45%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1211 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
891 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
876 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
876 Points 0%
Multi-Core
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
4051 Points +11%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
3661 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
3661 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -5%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3366 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3349 Points -9%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points +19%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
1095324 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
1095324 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1049981 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
767395 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
740935 Points -32%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
15165 Points +7%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
14915 Points +6%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
14109 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
14109 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -7%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11565 Points -18%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1051 Points +46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points +27%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
919 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
784 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
759 Points +5%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
722 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
722 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
7714 Points +12%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7088 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
6899 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
6899 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)
6460 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
6028 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4964 Points -28%
System
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
11778 Points +29%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
11650 Points +28%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
11239 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)
10308 Points +13%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
9114 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
9114 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7828 Points -14%
Memory
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9837 Points +50%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
7602 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)
7016 Points +7%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
6544 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
6544 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
5719 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4109 Points -37%
Graphics
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
23684 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
23684 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
20494 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18837 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)
17782 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
13308 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8511 Points -64%
Web
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1951 Points +22%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1762 Points +10%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
1604 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
1604 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)
1574 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1543 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1474 Points -8%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
29654 Points +173%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
29236 Points +169%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +64%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
10851 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
10851 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
8985 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5205 Points -52%
AImark - Score v3.x
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
28688 Points +3437%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +3022%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
811 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
811 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
717 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
585 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
Points -100%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
998 Points +6%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
939 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
939 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points -12%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
783 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
783 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points -5%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
704 Points -10%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
2488 Points +872%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +153%
OnePlus Nord 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 16384
256 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  ()
256 Points 0%

另一方面,那些看重图形处理能力的用户会觉得 OnePlus Nord 4 物有所值:在我们的基准测试中,这款智能手机经常处于领先地位。即使在更高分辨率(如 1440p)下,SoC 仍能实现可玩的帧率。

在下面的游戏部分,我们将对其游戏性能进行更深入的了解。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2844 Points
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2385 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2353 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1451 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 Points -68%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2937 Points
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2373 Points -19%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2359 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1474 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
926 Points -68%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11512 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8960 Points -22%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8667 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5434 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3992 Points -65%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8976 Points
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8394 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4752 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3897 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5850 Points +65%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5193 Points +47%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3536 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3005 Points -15%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14498 Points +26%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14348 Points +25%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11506 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7170 Points -38%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10309 Points +34%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7856 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7666 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6828 Points -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
116 fps +93%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +85%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
491 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
373 fps -24%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
297 fps -40%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
174 fps -65%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps -73%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +35%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps +30%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
271 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241 fps -11%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
218 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
107 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -65%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +63%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
191 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps -19%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps -39%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +25%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -47%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -23%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -55%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -12%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -27%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +35%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -30%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -33%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
130 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -21%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps -26%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -62%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -14%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -27%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps -64%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
989 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
966 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
979 Points

在互联网上冲浪,OnePlus Nord 4 的整体表现平平。有时,它只能在基准测试中排在最后一位,但有时,这款智能手机的性能也会处于领先地位。

一些较大的网站在快速滚动时,需要花很长时间才能加载完所有内容和图片。但总的来说,OnePlus Nord 4 的上网冲浪还是相当流畅的。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
148.56 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
131.393 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
123.193 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
119.9 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
119.886 Points
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
94.765 Points -21%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
161 runs/min +50%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
151 runs/min +41%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
147 runs/min +37%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +34%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
116 runs/min +8%
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
107 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
107 runs/min 0%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=66, last 2 years)
11.9 runs/min +8%
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
11 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
11 runs/min 0%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
10.5 runs/min -5%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
7.04 runs/min -36%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
6.3 runs/min -43%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
153 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
126 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +6%
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
110 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
110 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
103 Points -6%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
95 Points -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
55668 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
55668 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
50714 Points -9%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
46738 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
41576 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
39130 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ()
1153 ms * -0%
OnePlus Nord 4 (Chrome 127)
1152.9 ms *
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
1150 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
1012.6 ms * +12%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
886.7 ms * +23%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
847.9 ms * +26%

* ... smaller is better

其他对比设备都不提供 UFS 4.0 存储,因此 OnePlus 在此获得了真正的优惠:目前速度最快的 UFS 存储原本只用于一些真正的高端设备。它可以让你快速读写大量数据,并缩短加载时间。

不过,在随机读取方面,尤其是对分散在整个存储空间中的较小文件的读取,速度与其他 UFS 版本相比没有优势。

OnePlus Nord 4OnePlus Nord 3Motorola Edge 50 ProSamsung Galaxy A55 5GGoogle Pixel 8aAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-11%
-15%
-34%
-49%
32%
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB
3592.8
1617.78
-55%
1023.6
-72%
1688.53
-53%
1509.65
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB
2898.2
1525.8
-47%
1025.9
-65%
831.44
-71%
255.31
-91%
Random Read 4KB
250.4
308.68
23%
337
35%
351.47
40%
165.98
-34%
Random Write 4KB
276.2
376.9
36%
390.2
41%
132.11
-52%
243.82
-12%

游戏 - 与大联盟一样的游戏

在我们测试的三款手机游戏中,OnePlus Nord 4 的表现均高于同价位产品的平均水平。如果在《源氏冲击》中将图形细节设置为最低,甚至可以稳定运行 87 fps。暗黑破坏神不朽》以 60 帧/秒的速度非常稳定流畅地运行。

如果放弃Genshin Impact中的最佳图形处理,也能达到 58 帧的流畅帧数,但如果使用高设置,甚至还能达到 40 帧左右。一些高端智能手机可以从 OnePlus 身上学到一些东西。

我们使用

GameBench 软件来测量帧频。.

因此,总的来说,OnePlus Nord 4 可以轻松玩游戏,即使在高画质水平下也是如此。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 4; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø58.1 (50-60)
OnePlus Nord 4; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø40.7 (33-45)
OnePlus Nord 4; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø87.1 (80-90)
OnePlus Nord 4; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.4 (35-41)
OnePlus Nord 4; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low: Ø59.9 (57-61)
OnePlus Nord 4; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High: Ø59.7 (56-62)

排放物 - 会非常热

温度

我们测量到,在系统重载时,机箱的发热温度高达 47.5 °C(117.5 °F)。这一点非常明显,而且在室外的高温天会变得更热。

过去,OnePlus 智能手机的散热经常出现问题,为了让设备冷却,基准测试会自动中止。虽然这次没有发生同样的情况,但短时间后性能下降已经很明显了。虽然之后系统会再次尝试恢复其全部性能,但成功的时间很短。

Max. Load
 47.5 °C43.9 °C41.7 °C 
 47.3 °C44 °C41.4 °C 
 46.7 °C44.6 °C41.5 °C 
Maximum: 47.5 °C
Average: 44.3 °C
40.3 °C42.7 °C41 °C
41 °C42.7 °C42 °C
41.3 °C42.6 °C43.8 °C
Maximum: 43.8 °C
Average: 41.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +65%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88.6 % +47%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 % +37%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60.4 %
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.4 % -15%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % +72%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +72%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % +72%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 %
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -11%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.1 % +2%
OnePlus Nord 4
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 %
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 4 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.2 (9.82-17)
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.2 (14.1-14.2)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.78 (8.73-8.83)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.87 (7.57-14.8)
OnePlus Nord 4 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø43.4 (36.9-61.1)
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.2 (42.7-51.5)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.7 (28.6-32.3)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø33.9 (26-50.6)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)
OnePlus Nord 4 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø5.8 (3.85-7.27)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø5.33 (3.92-7.24)
热图前端
热图前端
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

除了底部边缘的专用扬声器外,听筒也被用作扬声器,让 OnePlus Nord 4 营造出轻盈的立体声效果。对于一款中端智能手机来说,音效非常吸引人。甚至可以听到一些中低音,使扬声器的声音更加饱满和温暖。

虽然你可以轻松地在智能手机上欣赏一些流行音乐,但在听古典音乐时,你可能不得不把音量调得稍低一些,这样你就无法听清交响乐团中的每件乐器。毕竟,这是一些非常小的扬声器。

喜欢使用耳机或外置扬声器的用户可以通过蓝牙或 USB-C 端口连接它们。在我们的测试中,这两种方法都能正常使用。支持以下用于音频传输的无线蓝牙编解码器:SBC、AAC、Qualcomm aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LHDC、aptX Adaptive 和 aptX TWS+。你必须使用一些更奇特的编解码器,如 LC3 或 Opus。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.6412538.2353129.223.44031.229.5503940.76324.523.48018.719.410023.326.712517.334.316014.743.920010.449.625012.551.731512.356.44009.660.850010.162.763013.463.28001364.1100015.565.3125010.665.7160010.373.4200010.775.2250011.272.7315013.171.5400013.665.5500014.666.4630014.472.9800015.4711000016.373.31250016.367.6160001752SPL25.682.8N0.753median 13.4median 65.3Delta2.39.533.229.731.83118.224.423.427.532.436.619.428.618.825.417.630.613.841.615.956.51654.316.456.815.161.513.864.112.97213.873.513.574.313.175.713.874.712.570.21372.313.274.714.577.413.482.5148315.276.51571.313.674.41772.515.564.72689.30.778.4median 13.8median 72.516.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus Nord 4Google Pixel 8a
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus Nord 4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 8a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 电池寿命长的高效智能手机

耗电量

在功耗方面,OnePlus Nord 4 表现出了相当高的效率,只要你对性能要求不高。在空闲模式下,我们测得的最大功耗为 1.5 瓦,在我们的对比设备中是最低的。

但一旦系统需要工作,功耗就会急剧增加,达到我们对比设备中的最高值之一,高达 11.3 瓦。

手机充电功率可达 100 瓦,但不包括相应的充电器。使用我们已有的 SuperVOOC 充电器,将电池电量从 0 充至 100%大约需要 35 分钟。充电几分钟后,也可以获得足够几个小时正常工作的电量。

不过,仍然令人讨厌的是,智能手机仍然没有无线充电选项。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.1 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 6.7 / 11.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus Nord 4
5500 mAh
OnePlus Nord 3
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-38%
9%
-4%
-12%
0%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.46
-62%
0.9
-0%
0.85
6%
0.92
-2%
0.9 ?()
-0%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.84
-67%
1.3
-18%
1.51
-37%
1.46
-33%
1.1 ?()
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2.14
-43%
1.6
-7%
1.71
-14%
1.65
-10%
1.5 ?()
-0%
Load Average *
6.7
8.64
-29%
4.8
28%
4.87
27%
7.96
-19%
6.7 ?()
-0%
Load Maximum *
11.3
9.99
12%
6.7
41%
11.73
-4%
10.74
5%
11.3 ?()
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 4; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.68 (0.881-8.63)
OnePlus Nord 4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.906 (0.806-1.147)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 4; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11 (10.3-11.3)
OnePlus Nord 4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.906 (0.806-1.147)

电池寿命

我们的测试机拥有 5,500 毫安时的电池容量,是对比机型中最强大的电池,与 OnePlus Nord 3 相比,电池容量增加了 10%。 一加 Nord 3的电池容量增加了 10%。

这一点在电池续航时间上也很明显,结果非常好:尽管在无线局域网中上网 16:38 小时并不是一个记录,但它仍然告诉我们,这款智能手机在不充电的情况下也能正常使用两天。

您甚至可以用内置存储空间观看更长时间的电影:连续观看所有《哈利-波特》电影的续航时间为 23:45 小时,应该不会对电池造成任何问题,甚至还有足够的电量再看一两部电影。

在智能手机需要再次充电之前,您可以玩超过 6 小时的高要求游戏。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 34min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 04min
OnePlus Nord 4
5500 mAh
OnePlus Nord 3
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
-12%
-5%
-24%
Reader / Idle
2074
1755
-15%
1895
-9%
2202
6%
1803
-13%
H.264
1425
1725
21%
1120
-21%
1511
6%
1132
-21%
WiFi v1.3
998
815
-18%
979
-2%
1077
8%
796
-20%
Load
364
350
-4%
302
-17%
220
-40%
211
-42%

Pros

+ 高品质一体成型机身
+ 快速存储
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 承诺较长的更新时间
+ 强大的游戏性能
+ 明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏

Cons

- 处理器有点慢
- 没有无线充电功能
- 不支持 eSIM
- USB-2.0 端口速度慢
- 无真正的光学变焦
- 预装软件
- 白平衡不够准确

评价 - 高品质,真正的玩家

测试 OnePlus Nord 4。测试机由 OnePlus 欧洲公司提供。
测试 OnePlus Nord 4。测试机由 OnePlus 欧洲公司提供。

OnePlus Nord 4 的外观令人印象深刻:一体式机身、显示屏周围的纤细边框以及完美无瑕的做工,让它丝毫不输给价格高出一倍的智能手机。

此外,极快的存储速度、高充电性能、明亮的 OLED 显示屏、大容量电池和长期的更新承诺也给人增添了几分奢华的印象。

但如果你仔细观察一下该设备,就会发现它的定位是中端而非高端:没有无线充电,没有光学变焦,最快的 WLAN 标准只有 WiFi 6,USB-2.0 端口蹩脚,缺乏超宽带连接等现代化设备。机壳缺乏更好的防水性能。在性能方面,我们甚至看到了与前代产品相比的一些退步。

另一方面,Nord 4 带给你的是强大的游戏性能。OnePlus 在这里进行了非常出色的优化,甚至可以在《PUBG Mobile》中达到近 90 帧的速度。

最后,你必须问一问 OnePlus Nord 4 对你来说什么才是真正重要的智能手机:虽然它提供了许多你期望在更昂贵的智能手机上才能实现的功能,但它同时也留下了一些设备上的空白。

由于 OnePlus Nord 4 采用了出色的外壳,它的质感比你想象的要好,因为它的售价约为 500 欧元(约合 553 美元)。

不乏替代品:目前,OnePlus Nord 3 一加 Nord 3的前身已经可以以低于 400 欧元(约合 443 美元)的价格买到。谷歌 谷歌 Pixel 8a更小巧,人工智能功能更强大。

价格和供应情况

尽管 OnePlus Nord 4 已在亚马逊网站上市,但它与美国的 CDMA 网络不兼容。在全球范围内,该产品可从Amazon 购买,英国售价为 357 英镑。印度的售价为 30,000 IRS 起。在许多国家,您也可以直接从 OnePlus 购买。

请注意,我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。您可以在 这里.

OnePlus Nord 4 - 09/02/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
46 / 69 → 66%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
39 / 55 → 70%
Application Performance
64 / 85 → 75%
AI Performance
39%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 85%
Camera
60%
Average
66%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
15%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
96%
Repairability
16%
Software Updates
81.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 49.8%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > OnePlus Nord 4 智能手机评测 - Unibody 一体成型机身,价格低廉,令上流社会怦然心动
Florian Schmitt, 2024-09- 3 (Update: 2024-09- 3)