全球最薄智能手机的电池续航时间令人难以置信--Oppo Find N5 评测

Name: Oppo Find N5
Brand: Oppo

不是 OnePlus Open 2。

Oppo Find N5 是世界上最薄的可折叠智能手机，但尽管设计纤薄，它也有一些局限性。这款可折叠手机配备了骁龙8精英处理器、潜望式摄像头和超大电池。Oppo 是否已经在强调Galaxy Z Fold 7 所不能提供的功能？
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/31/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Foldable Touchscreen Smartphone

OPPO Find N5 的评价

凭借其纤薄轻巧的设计，Oppo 成功地将 Find N3 打造成了一款近乎完美的经典智能手机。此外，它还拥有 8.12 英寸屏幕的显著优势。Find N5 不仅是世界上最薄的可折叠手机，而且由于采用了 OPPO 的 "抗衰老处理 "技术，它还与其他可折叠手机一样没有褶皱。

除了出色的用户体验，Oppo 还内置了大量强大的硬件。7 核版本的骁龙 8 精英版虽然在性能上弱于标准版，但仍能提供高水平的性能。此外，手写笔支持、出色的扬声器和明亮的显示屏也是 Find N5 的优势所在。尽管与前代产品相比重量有所减轻，但 OPPO 仍设法大幅增加了电池容量，从而实现了几乎超越竞争对手的出色电池续航时间。

Test device courtesy of Trading Shenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

由于设计原因，与高端竞争产品相比，买家无疑不得不接受一些限制。摄像头不是顶级的，高节流也不是完美的。我们还怀念 6 GHz Wi-Fi 频段和透明的选材。Find N2 的外形设计在日常生活中更加实用，我们也欢迎下一代 Oppo 可折叠设备采用这种外形设计，使其拥有独特的卖点。

Pros

+ 轻薄

+ 防水外壳

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板

+ 无恼人的显示屏折痕

+ 电池寿命长

+ 高性能

Cons

- ......高级节流

- CN 版本的限制（无 eSIM，...）

- 只能导入

价格和供应情况

Oppo Find N5 的全球版本配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 闪存，售价约为 1,789 美元。中国版 OPPO 手机在深圳交易市场的起价为 1594 元。据我们目前所知，全球版本也不会在欧洲推出。

OPPO Find N5 的评价
Oppo Find N5 规格
手机壳 - Oppo 智能手机薄得令人难以置信
功能 - Find N5 有一个 USB 端口
软件 - 可折叠手机配备Android 15
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Oppo Find N5 配备了 WiFi 7
电话功能和语音质量 - 双卡双待的可折叠智能手机
摄像头 - Oppo 手机采用哈苏品牌
配件和保修 - Oppo Find N5 附带一个充电器
输入设备和操作 - 可折叠手机使用面部解锁功能
显示屏 - Oppo 采用 OLED 面板
性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的可折叠手机
游戏 - Oppo Find N5 只能达到 90fps
排放 - Oppo 智能手机有一个热点
电池续航时间 - Oppo Find N5 充电迅速
Notebookcheck 总体评分

凭借 Find N5，Oppo 取代Honor Magic V3 成为全球最薄的可折叠手机。不过，除了极致纤薄的外壳，它还提供了令人兴奋的功能：Oppo 手机配备 8.12 英寸显示屏，使用 5,600 毫安时电池，这意味着该储能设备存储的电量比 Magic V3 的电池多出近 30%。三星Galaxy Z Fold 6.

由于采用了高通骁龙8精英版以及配备潜望式长焦镜头的哈苏三摄像头。与前代产品不同，Find N5 不会以 OnePlus Open 2 的身份在欧洲发布。

Oppo Find N5 规格

Oppo Find N5 (Find N Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2, 7 Core version

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 830

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

8.12 inch 9.9:9, 2480 x 2248 pixel 412 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, AMOLED, outer Screen: 6.62-inch, 2.616 x 1.140, 120 Hz, Oppo pen support, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB

, 458 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 4.21 x 160.87 x 146.58

Battery

5600 mAh Silicon-Carbon

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.89, OIS, videos @2160p/60fps); 50 MPix (f/2.7, OIS, periscope-telephoto lens) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, OIS, wide-angle lens)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4, videos @2160p/30fps, front camera); 8 MPix (f/2.4, inner camera)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, case, Color OS, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1/L5), GLONASS, BeiDou (B1I/B1C/B2a), Galileo (E1/E5a), QZSS (L1/L5), fanless, waterproof

Weight

229 g, Power Supply: 106 g

Price

1577 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

手机壳 - Oppo 智能手机薄得令人难以置信

Find N5 的外壳厚度仅为 4.2 毫米，是可折叠市场上最薄的手机。折叠后的厚度为 8.9 毫米，Oppo 手机几乎不比传统智能手机厚。重量方面也是如此，Oppo 将其 XXL 可折叠设备的重量减至 229 克，仅比Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 的 227 克重一些。这主要是通过使用新开发的钛金属铰链实现的。

钛合金挠性铰链在日常使用中感觉坚固耐用，具有良好的刚性。其耐用性已通过德国莱茵 TÜV 认证。除了精美的设计和窄显示屏边框外，Find N5 还具有 IPX9 防水认证，并散发出高级感。Find N5 还配备了 OnePlus 智能手机特有的提醒滑动按钮，可用于通知静音。

正面的显示屏由经典的纳米水晶玻璃保护，内部面板则采用了肖特UTG 特殊玻璃，其表层由专门开发的抗震弹性材料制成。

Oppo Find N5 智能手机评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

尺寸比较

功能 - Find N5 有一个 USB 端口

总体而言，这家中国制造商的可折叠设备具有出色的功能设置，包括蓝牙 5.4、USB OTG、红外爆破器、Miracast 和近场通信。据 OPPO 称，NFC 芯片会对收集到的人工智能和用户数据进行加密，并通过额外的安全芯片防止数据被盗。快速 USB 3.2 端口还支持有线图像输出。

值得一提的是，它还兼容 iOS 和 iPadOS 设备，可以无缝共享照片、视频和文件。通过 "O+ Connect "应用程序，Find N5 还可用作键盘、触控板和外置多点触摸屏。

软件 - 可折叠手机配备Android 15

Find N5 搭载了Android 15，并辅以该公司的 ColorOS 15。根据制造商的说法，这款可折叠手机将获得五年的安全更新，但 OPPO 没有透露你可以期待多少次Android 升级。因此，更新支持令人满意，但三星和谷歌已经表明，更长时间的更新是可能的。

当然，人工智能也是 ColorOS 的必备功能。第 15 版包含全新的 AI 搜索和众多 AI 功能，如 AI 通话摘要和 AI 照片编辑。此外，非常实用的 "无界视图 "功能也加入其中，该功能允许在显示屏边界之外同时使用三个应用程序。其他制造商应该立即从中得到启发。

可持续性

Find N5 的包装不含塑料，采用大豆油墨印刷。根据制造商的可持续发展报告，包装中使用的纤维有 45% 来自回收材料。我们没有发现可折叠设备本身使用回收材料的相关信息。用户的可修复性也不是重点，而且很难验证。在透明度方面，Oppo 还有很多工作要做。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Oppo Find N5 配备了 WiFi 7

无论您选择的是中国版还是全球版，Oppo 可折叠手机在无线频段方面都配备齐全，可以在德语国家无损使用。在 Wi-Fi 连接方面，Find N5 采用了当前的 Wi-Fi 7 标准，提供了最好的无线连接，但遗憾的是，我们的中国版本无法使用 6 GHz 频道建立连接。因此，我们在使用 Wi-Fi 6E 参考路由器时只使用了 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段。

华硕 ROG Rapture GT AXE11000 的传输速度并不稳定，但我们在接收数据时测得的峰值接近 1,800 Mbps。不过，Find N5 在发送数据时速度明显较慢。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Oppo Find N3 Wi-Fi 7	1495 (709^min - 1727^max) MBit/s +119%
Average Wi-Fi 7 (556 - 1806, n=59)	1015 MBit/s +49%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Wi-Fi 7	969 (909^min - 998^max) MBit/s +42%
Honor Magic V3 Wi-Fi 7	919 (808^min - 971^max) MBit/s +35%
Average of class Smartphone (49.8 - 1806, n=190, last 2 years)	724 MBit/s +6%
Oppo Find N5 Wi-Fi 7	682 (502^min, 506.93^P1 - 851^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7	632 MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	531 (263^min - 608^max) MBit/s -22%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Oppo Find N3 Wi-Fi 7	1733 (1600^min - 1830^max) MBit/s +11%
Oppo Find N5 Wi-Fi 7	1562 (1218^min, 1249.03^P1 - 1772^max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7 (565 - 1875, n=59)	1014 MBit/s -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Wi-Fi 7	893 (418^min - 933^max) MBit/s -43%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7	892 MBit/s -43%
Honor Magic V3 Wi-Fi 7	771 (387^min - 800^max) MBit/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	761 (683^min - 800^max) MBit/s -51%
Average of class Smartphone (52 - 1857, n=188, last 2 years)	709 MBit/s -55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Wi-Fi 7	1845 (924^min - 1886^max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7 (563 - 1945, n=45)	1536 MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (521 - 1945, n=82, last 2 years)	1436 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	770 (402^min - 836^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7	632 (569^min - 679^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Wi-Fi 7	1843 (1524^min - 1885^max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7 (451 - 1864, n=45)	1510 MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (451 - 1864, n=82, last 2 years)	1367 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	1365 (1221^min - 1406^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7	892 (720^min - 981^max) MBit/s

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø632 (569-679)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (720-981)

Oppo Find N5 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø682 (502-851)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø632 (569-679)

Oppo Find N5 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1562 (1218-1772)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø892 (720-981)

在一次骑行中，我们将 Find N5 的跟踪性能与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。Oppo 手机使用双频 GNSS 定位，精确度在 3 米以内。测得的总距离与 Garmin 智能手表非常相似，在详细的路线中也只能发现细微的偏差。

电话功能和语音质量 - 双卡双待的可折叠智能手机

选择全球版 Find N5 的用户可以选择在系统中集成 eSIM 卡。然而，中国版的 Color OS 却不提供这一功能。不过，Find N5 支持双卡双待，还支持 Wi-Fi 通话和 VoLTE。

听筒的通话质量非常令人满意，尽管我们的通话对象有时听起来有点闷。

摄像头 - Oppo 手机采用哈苏品牌

尽管采用了超薄设计，Oppo 还是为 Find N5 的哈苏品牌三摄像头配备了光学防抖功能。不过，对于一款可折叠设备来说，还是不得不做出一些妥协。例如，5000 万像素主摄像头传感器的 1/1.56 英寸规格相当小，但这并不影响日光下的照片质量。特别是考虑到前代产品采用了更大的传感器，升级到索尼 LYT700 并不理想。但即使在黑暗环境中，Oppo 手机仍能以较低的噪点水平保留 Find N5 图像中的大量细节。

潜望镜相机配备了 5000 万像素的高分辨率传感器，在光线充足的情况下也能获得良好的拍摄效果。它的无损放大倍数为 3 倍，还能进行远摄微距拍摄。用于拍摄超广角照片的 800 万像素镜头稍显不足，在测试照片中出现了明显的模糊和一些图像伪影。

虽然 Find N5 的主摄像头可实现 10 位视频，包括杜比视界和高达 4K 分辨率、每秒 60 帧的详细记录，但在视频过程中更换主体只能在 4K30 下实现 HDR。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra-wide-angle Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在受控的照明条件下，我们分析了主相机的色彩还原与实际参考色彩的对比情况。ColorChecker 通行证中的 5000 万像素镜头显示曝光过度，尤其是在明亮的色彩中。我们发现 Find N5 在色彩保真度方面存在一些异常值（>10）。

配件和保修 - Oppo Find N5 附带一个充电器

我们的中文版配有一个 80 瓦的快速充电电源适配器、一条数据/充电线（USB-C 转 USB-A）、一个 SIM 卡针、一份快速入门指南和一个保护套。两块屏幕上还安装了塑料薄膜，并随附一个保护套。我们的设备贷方 Trading Shenzhen 还为随附的额外物品增加了一个欧盟充电器适配器和一个 USB OTG 适配器。

我们的进口设备享有 12 个月的保修服务。如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机运送到德国地址。

输入设备和操作 - 可折叠手机使用面部解锁功能

两块 OLED 触摸屏的采样率高达 240 Hz，可快速响应手指输入。得益于 120 Hz 的面板，动画也能流畅显示，而且两个面板都支持 Oppo Pen。Oppo 还为其可折叠手机提供了三星的 Flex 模式，即折叠后的扩展显示屏选项。

Find N5 的外屏纵横比为 20.7:9，可以像传统智能手机一样使用。这款可折叠手机拥有 8.12 英寸的大屏幕，也为多任务处理提供了足够的空间。不过，潜在买家在购买前应注意，由于长宽比不同寻常，大屏幕不太适合使用应用程序。

指纹传感器集成在电源按钮上。它的位置有点高，但解锁 OPPO 手机非常可靠。此外，还可以使用使用 800 万像素摄像头的相当不安全的 2D 面部识别系统。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - Oppo 采用 OLED 面板

两种 OLED 显示器都使用 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，每个矩阵由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成

Find N5 的可折叠双屏蔽柔性显示屏分辨率为 412 PPI，对角线为 8.12 英寸，这使得这款 OPPO 手机的屏幕面积略大于竞争对手。此外，由于我们在日常使用中无法察觉到任何明显的褶皱，因此内部面板看起来几乎没有褶皱。该制造商还宣称其可折叠手机获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的 "最小褶皱 "认证。

在我们的测量中，120 Hz LTPO 面板的峰值亮度达到 2,026 cd/m²²（APL18）。为了在观看闪烁的 OLED 面板时保护眼睛，当屏幕亮度低于 70 尼特时，Oppo 使用高频 PWM 调光（2,160 Hz）。使用示波器，Find N5 在较高亮度下的闪烁频率为 120 Hz，随着亮度的增加，频率增至 240 Hz。

Inner display brightness


1189 cd/m²	1156 cd/m²	1167 cd/m²
1202 cd/m²	1240 cd/m²	1198 cd/m²
1126 cd/m²	1154 cd/m²	1178 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2 (inner display)

Maximum: 1240 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1178.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 1240 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.239

	Oppo Find N5 AMOLED, 2480x2248, 8.1"	Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold OLED LTPO, 2152x2076, 8"	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2, 2160x1856, 7.6"	Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 AMOLED LPTO, 2488x2224, 8"	Honor Magic V3 OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9"	Oppo Find N3 OLED, 2440x2268, 7.8"
Screen		19%	10%	-44%	10%	3%
Brightness middle	1240	1793 45%	1396 13%	1111 -10%	1019 -18%	1283 3%
Brightness	1179	1599 36%	1387 18%	1120 -5%	1032 -12%	1290 9%
Brightness Distribution	91	66 -27%	89 -2%	99 9%	95 4%	98 8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.36	0.9 34%	1.7 -25%	3.42 -151%	1 26%	1.5 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.06	3.1 -1%	2.5 18%	5.92 -93%	2.2 28%	3.4 -11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	1.7 29%	1.5 37%	2.7 -13%	1.7 29%	2 17%
Gamma	2.239 ^98%	2.19 ^100%	2.16 ^102%	2.206 ^100%	2.26 ^97%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6353 ^102%	6714 ^97%	6495 ^100%	7081 ^92%	6473 ^100%	6435 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 18 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

使用固定变焦级别和各种亮度设置进行一系列测量。

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和照相光谱仪对色彩校准进行了测试。自然配置文件使用的是 DCI P3，而 Find N5 在专业配置文件中使用的是较小的 sRGB 色彩空间。在我们的测量中，后者的色彩保真度最高，偏差明显在目标范围内（<3）。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6 ms rise
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7 ms rise
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

虽然主显示屏上的塑料薄膜反光明显，但无论使用哪种面板，Oppo 手机在户外都给人留下了极好的印象。不过，视角稳定性非常好，亮度下降也很小。

外部显示屏

副显示屏采用 6.62 英寸 AMOLED 面板，峰值亮度同样为 2,198 cd/m² (APL18)。与主屏幕一样，由于采用了 LTPO 技术，刷新率在 1 到 120 Hz 之间变化。外屏分辨率为 2,616 x 1,140 像素，像素密度为 431 PPI。

Outer display brightness


1324 cd/m²	1322 cd/m²	1305 cd/m²
1356 cd/m²	1358 cd/m²	1348 cd/m²
1299 cd/m²	1309 cd/m²	1328 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 1358 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1327.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1358 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.213

性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的可折叠手机

Find N5 是首款搭载骁龙 8 精英版不过，这里只使用了具有五个性能核心的版本，而不是六个。这意味着，高通公司在生产过程中很可能也会将一个内核存在缺陷的问题芯片纳入其中，并以较低的价格销售。

不过，这并不影响日常性能；即使同时使用多个应用程序，Oppo 手机仍能提供足够的性能储备。不过，基准测试结果却有些不同。在 Geekbench 多核测试中，缺失的核心尤为明显，而在 Geekbench AI 测试中，由于结果不佳，NPU 也可能受到了影响。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2309 - 3228, n=13)	3004 Points +4%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2888 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	2239 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2184 Points -24%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2170 Points -25%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1359 Points -53%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1982 Points -31%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1534 Points -47%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3479, n=195, last 2 years)	1530 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8154 - 10401, n=13)	9287 Points +13%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	8243 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	6894 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	6794 Points -18%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	6279 Points -24%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	4882 Points -41%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	4987 Points -40%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	4536 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 10401, n=195, last 2 years)	4359 Points -47%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2099 - 2258, n=7)	2187 Points +4%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2099 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1689 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1651 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1374 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (139 - 2437, n=169, last 2 years)	1085 Points -48%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (6384 - 8816, n=7)	7441 Points +10%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	6765 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	5899 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	5898 Points -13%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	3874 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 8816, n=169, last 2 years)	3653 Points -46%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2340778 - 3015111, n=11)	2667882 Points +14%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2340778 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1934541 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1685774 Points -28%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1607165 Points -31%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1390723 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=128, last 2 years)	1325221 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1322101 Points -44%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (14984 - 27169, n=11)	22112 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	18026 Points +20%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	17917 Points +20%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	16056 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	16234 Points +8%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	14984 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=195, last 2 years)	13737 Points -8%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	12938 Points -14%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	11562 Points -23%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8334 - 13729, n=9)	10900 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	10120 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	9555 Points +2%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9347 Points
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	8400 Points -10%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	8283 Points -11%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	7637 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 13729, n=160, last 2 years)	6669 Points -29%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (10849 - 19891, n=9)	15091 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	15087 Points +30%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	14552 Points +25%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	12736 Points +9%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11637 Points
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	11279 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 19891, n=160, last 2 years)	10483 Points -10%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	8038 Points -31%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7263 - 18911, n=9)	12960 Points +50%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	11938 Points +38%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	10626 Points +23%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	10023 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	9073 Points +5%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	8647 Points
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	7426 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=160, last 2 years)	7299 Points -16%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (35527 - 51041, n=9)	42150 Points +4%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	40383 Points
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	34612 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	32352 Points -20%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	32334 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	30845 Points -24%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	21728 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=160, last 2 years)	18965 Points -53%
Web
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1993 Points +9%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1983 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1882 Points +3%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1823 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1202 - 2363, n=9)	1796 Points -1%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1717 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=160, last 2 years)	1598 Points -12%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1077 Points -41%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	36048 Points +214%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=152, last 2 years)	17950 Points +57%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	17834 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	17812 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8865 - 22767, n=9)	16986 Points +48%
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	15837 Points +38%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	12651 Points +10%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11465 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	213849 Points +27073%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (787 - 307528, n=10)	32360 Points +4012%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)	26722 Points +3295%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	24087 Points +2961%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1434 Points +82%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	963 Points +22%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	787 Points

Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=35, last 2 years)	1776 Points +197%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (594 - 1708, n=9)	1169 Points +95%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1126 Points +88%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	598 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=35, last 2 years)	1077 Points +306%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (265 - 734, n=9)	513 Points +94%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	492 Points +86%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	265 Points
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (287 - 738, n=9)	526 Points +83%
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	491 Points +71%
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 1501, n=35, last 2 years)	436 Points +52%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	287 Points

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	3199 Points
Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	3092 Points
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3219, n=36, last 2 years)	930 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (137 - 287, n=4)	234 Points
Score V6
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11267 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (302 - 11267, n=9)	6369 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone (68.9 - 12223, n=36, last 2 years)	4388 Points -61%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1168 Points -90%

高通公司尚未提供有关 Adreno 830 的更多详细信息。 Adreno 830 的着色器数量或 7 核版本的时钟速度的更多细节。根据 Find N5 在 GFXBench 中的屏幕外得分，可以推测 GPU 也受到了限制。与其他手机相比，Oppo 手机的性能有时要低 20%。屏幕上的数值也使用了主显示屏。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5955 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4693 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4411 Points -26%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4341 Points -27%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3628 Points -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2602 Points -56%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6089 Points
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4626 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4235 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4021 Points -34%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3687 Points -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2584 Points -58%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25231 Points
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18997 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18726 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	16021 Points -37%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	13998 Points -45%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9302 Points -63%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9657 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7402 Points -23%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7362 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7290 Points -25%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9565 Points
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7694 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7487 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7345 Points -23%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2007 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1511 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1503 Points -25%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1280 Points -36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1043 Points -48%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1987 Points
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1633 Points -18%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1549 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1457 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1386 Points -30%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1093 Points -45%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	665 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	503 fps -24%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	488 fps -27%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	437 fps -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	423 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	398 fps -40%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps +95%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	375 fps +21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	355 fps +14%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	346 fps +11%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	311 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	299 fps -4%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	253 fps -19%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	111 fps +85%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps +43%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	288 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	247 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	236 fps -18%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	225 fps -22%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	196 fps -32%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	167 fps -42%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	89 fps +48%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +12%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps -2%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps -12%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -18%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	187 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	151 fps -19%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	128 fps -32%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	122 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps -58%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +26%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps 0%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51 fps -4%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	43 fps -19%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -28%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	87 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	75 fps -14%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps -21%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -49%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps +35%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78 fps +30%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	174 fps -21%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	173 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	133 fps -40%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	123 fps -44%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps -51%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	38 fps
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	35 fps -8%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps -18%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	33 fps -13%
Oppo Find N3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	27 fps -29%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -47%

在日常使用中，Find N5 的浏览器速度完全没有问题，网站加载迅速，滚动流畅。不过，这款可折叠手机在浏览器基准测试中的成绩不佳。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (89.7 - 289, n=11)	222 Points +50%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	172.212 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	155.837 Points +5%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	147.767 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=171, last 2 years)	132 Points -11%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	117.483 Points -20%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	87.027 Points -41%
Honor Magic V3 (Performance Mode, Chrome 128)	64.069 Points -57%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)	62.738 Points -58%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (244 - 419, n=6)	362 runs/min +48%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	308 runs/min +26%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	244 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	237 runs/min -3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	182 runs/min -25%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=151, last 2 years)	158.9 runs/min -35%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	115 runs/min -53%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 34, n=10)	25 runs/min +63%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	16.5 runs/min +8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	15.7 runs/min +3%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	15.3 runs/min
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	14.9 runs/min -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=87, last 2 years)	12.6 runs/min -18%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	6.53 runs/min -57%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	211 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (125 - 255, n=9)	189.9 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	189 Points +20%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	157 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=161, last 2 years)	124.1 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	112 Points -29%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	69 Points -56%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)	28 Points -82%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (37943 - 94399, n=11)	76680 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	66754 Points +46%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	62374 Points +37%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	50938 Points +12%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	45665 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=209, last 2 years)	41397 Points -9%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	27245 Points -40%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)	21928 Points -52%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)	2065.6 ms * -136%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)	1762.4 ms * -102%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=170, last 2 years)	1451 ms * -66%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	873.45 ms *
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)	710.4 ms * +19%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)	554.57 ms * +37%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)	545.6 ms * +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (422 - 873, n=10)	524 ms * +40%

* ... smaller is better

在存储方面，Find N5 的高吞吐率给人留下了深刻印象。这款 OPPO 手机采用了 UFS 4.0 标准，读写速度非常快。

	Oppo Find N5	Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6	Xiaomi Mix Fold 4	Honor Magic V3	Oppo Find N3	Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-26%	-14%	23%	27%	15%	20%	-23%
Sequential Read 256KB	3437.47	1827.6 -47%	4115.34 20%	3984.91 16%	3825.59 11%	3098.47 -10%	3675 ?(1851 - 4512, n=43) 7%	2004 ?(269 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) -42%
Sequential Write 256KB	3251.98	1126.34 -65%	2083.25 -36%	3073.45 -5%	3393.12 4%	2863.35 -12%	3069 ?(1524 - 4030, n=43) -6%	1618 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=192, last 2 years) -50%
Random Read 4KB	269.51	263.31 -2%	398.01 48%	369.73 37%	365.48 36%	351.92 31%	381 ?(250 - 504, n=43) 41%	283 ?(47.6 - 504, n=192, last 2 years) 5%
Random Write 4KB	339.32	376.94 11%	45.73 -87%	485.32 43%	527.68 56%	505.81 49%	467 ?(45.7 - 964, n=43) 38%	324 ?(9.4 - 964, n=192, last 2 years) -5%

游戏 - Oppo Find N5 只能达到 90fps

我们分析了已安装的 Adreno GPU 除了基准软件包之外，我们还仔细研究了当前的Android 游戏。通过我们的合作伙伴GameBench作为示例，我们确定了 Play Store 中两款游戏的准确帧率。为此，我们使用了更大的内置屏幕。

毫无疑问，使用大尺寸 OLED 面板玩游戏非常有趣，但游戏玩家可能应该给 Find N5 留个 "后路"。首先，100fps 以上的 HFR 游戏是不可能实现的；其次，在要求苛刻的游戏（如《源氏冲击》）中，Oppo 手机的帧速率会迅速大幅下降。

Oppo Find N5; Genshin Impact: Ø40.6 (34-60)

Oppo Find N5; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.1 (85-90)

Oppo Find N5; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (43-60)

Oppo Find N5; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (34-41)

排放 - Oppo 智能手机有一个热点

温度

在 3DMark 压力测试中，Find N5 散发的热量明显导致系统性能下降。我们测得的节流率约为 50%。在使用 Burnout 基准测试的负载情况下，机箱表面温度变化很大，但即使在热点区域也保持在非关键水平。

Max. Load

Idle


47.9 °C	43.1 °C	39.7 °C
37.8 °C	36.6 °C	30.8 °C
30 °C	29.8 °C	29.6 °C

Maximum: 47.9 °C
Average: 36.1 °C


35.5 °C	39.6 °C	41.2 °C
33 °C	38 °C	45.4 °C
28.2 °C	28.3 °C	30.3 °C

Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 35.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 19.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.9 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78.7 % +40%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67.2 % +20%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.2 % +6%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56.1 %
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54 % -4%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76.9 % +42%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76.5 % +41%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.5 % +8%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55.9 % +3%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.3 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69.7 % +22%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 % +1%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.2 %
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49.3 % -14%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	82.5 % +42%
Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	71.7 % +23%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	70.5 % +21%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.3 %
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55.5 % -5%

Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.4 (19.1-35.1)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.5 (17-30.4)

Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø87.1 (72.8-129.9)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø58.5 (52.4-97.2)

Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.8 (18.7-32.7)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.4 (14-28.3)

Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.2 (9.05-15.5)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.15 (7.05-12.7)

发言人

耳机可通过 USB 端口连接。喜欢使用蓝牙进行无线播放的用户可以从多种编解码器中进行选择。

Oppo 智能手机的立体声扬声器音质非常好，即使超高频缺乏深度。不过，扬声器还是能产生很有深度的低音。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Find N5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Oppo Find N3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Oppo Find N5 充电迅速

耗电量

尽管机身极为纤薄，Oppo 仍将 N3 的电池容量大幅提升至 5,600 毫安时。电池的最大充电功率为 80 瓦，支持最高 50 瓦的无线充电。使用适当的电源适配器，充电过程只需不到 50 分钟。

我们使用大尺寸主屏幕测量了耗电量。对于一款 XXL 可折叠手机来说，1.4 瓦的能耗相对较低，尤其是在空闲运行时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 1.4 / 1.9 Watt
Load	7.2 / 12.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Oppo Find N5 5600 mAh	Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4650 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 4400 mAh	Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 5100 mAh	Honor Magic V3 5150 mAh	Oppo Find N3 4805 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-57%	-15%	-22%	10%	-19%	3%	8%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	1.28 -42%	0.83 8%	1.5 -67%	1.12 -24%	1.16 -29%	0.81 ?(0.49 - 1.11, n=11) 10%	0.872 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=163, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Average *	1.4	2.99 -114%	1.3 7%	1.9 -36%	1.58 -13%	1.8 -29%	1.343 ?(0.87 - 2.06, n=11) 4%	1.435 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=163, last 2 years) -3%
Idle Maximum *	1.9	3.32 -75%	1.44 24%	2.6 -37%	1.66 13%	1.84 3%	1.453 ?(0.94 - 2.1, n=11) 24%	1.583 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=163, last 2 years) 17%
Load Average *	7.2	7.25 -1%	13.57 -88%	5.8 19%	5.9 18%	10.98 -53%	9.15 ?(6.7 - 13, n=10) -27%	6.97 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years) 3%
Load Maximum *	12.8	19.46 -52%	16.03 -25%	11.2 12%	5.94 54%	11.1 13%	12.1 ?(8.86 - 19.2, n=10) 5%	10.4 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years) 19%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.45 (0.936-14.7)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.76 (0.831-5.43)

Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.06 (0.858-1.877)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.775 (1.53-2.66)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.64 (6.86-11.6)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.67 (5.26-11.2)

Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.06 (0.858-1.877)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.775 (1.53-2.66)

电池运行时间

Find N5 配备 8.12 英寸显示屏，显示亮度调整为 150 cd/m²，作为一款可折叠手机，它的续航能力非常出色--在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间接近 22 小时。这也是可折叠手机竞争中落后的地方，例如 Honor Magic V3在连续播放视频时，它甚至能坚持 15 个小时。由于采用了更小的外置面板，Find N5 的总时长还能再增加几个小时，这将使我们进入破纪录的领域。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		36h 41min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 135)		21h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		31h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 45min

	Oppo Find N5 5600 mAh	Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4650 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 4400 mAh	Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 5100 mAh	Honor Magic V3 5150 mAh	Oppo Find N3 4805 mAh
Battery Runtime		-33%	-30%	-18%	-32%	-34%
Reader / Idle	2201			2067 -6%	1692 -23%
H.264	1913			1421 -26%	1043 -45%
WiFi v1.3	1306	879 -33%	913 -30%	968 -26%	830 -36%	861 -34%
Load	285			244 -14%	223 -22%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Oppo Find N5 是一款轻巧、舒适、超薄的迷你平板电脑，尽管其尺寸与普通智能手机相当。

Back to the verdict

Oppo Find N5 - 03/27/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

73 / 75 → 97%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

66 / 69 → 96%

Weight

88%

Battery

93%

Display

91%

Games Performance

38 / 55 → 70%

Application Performance

72 / 85 → 85%

AI Performance

18%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

83%

Average

69%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
95.9%

Repairability
45%

Software Updates
78.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 53.2%

Possible alternatives compared

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 87%	Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Pro... 2. $6.07 FZZSZS (3-Pack for Oppo Find... 3. $12.68 Puccy 4 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1577€	229 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8.12" 2480x2248 412 PPI AMOLED
2. 84.4%	Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $9.99 YEYEBF Screen Protector for ... 2. $20.99 Ferilinso 2 Pack Screen Prot... 3. $29.99 Ferilinso 2 Pack Privacy Scr... List Price: 1899€	257 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8.00" 2152x2076 374 PPI OLED LTPO
3. 86.1%	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $44.95 SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold 6 S Pe... 2. $15.68 Galaxy Z Fold 6 S Pen Fold E... 3. $42.75 DearHot 15W Qi Wireless Car ... List Price: 2119€	239 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7.60" 2160x1856 375 PPI AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2
4. 85.3%	Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $31.99 JSAUX Cup Holder Universal M... 2. $9.99 MOOISVS [2Pack for Xiaomi Mi... 3. $14.13 YOUULAR [3 Pack Screen Prote... List Price: 1250€	226 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7.98" 2488x2224 418 PPI AMOLED LPTO
5. 86.3%	Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $9.99 MOOISVS [2+2Pack for Honor M... 2. $9.99 MOOISVS 2+2pack for Honor Ma... 3. $9.90 Anbzsign 2+2Pack for Honor M... List Price: 2000€	226 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7.92" 2344x2156 402 PPI OLED
6. 88.3% ^{v7 (old)}	Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB	Amazon: 1. $22.98 AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... 2. $116.68 LCD Display for Oppo Find N3... 3. $15.95 IPG for Oppo Find N3 Flip Sm... List Price: 1800€	239 g	1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	7.82" 2440x2268 426 PPI OLED

OPPO Find N5 的评价

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

Oppo Find N5 规格

手机壳 - Oppo 智能手机薄得令人难以置信

尺寸比较

功能 - Find N5 有一个 USB 端口

软件 - 可折叠手机配备Android 15

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Oppo Find N5 配备了 WiFi 7

电话功能和语音质量 - 双卡双待的可折叠智能手机

摄像头 - Oppo 手机采用哈苏品牌

配件和保修 - Oppo Find N5 附带一个充电器

输入设备和操作 - 可折叠手机使用面部解锁功能

显示屏 - Oppo 采用 OLED 面板

Inner display brightness

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

外部显示屏

Outer display brightness

性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的可折叠手机

游戏 - Oppo Find N5 只能达到 90fps

排放 - Oppo 智能手机有一个热点

温度

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

发言人

Oppo Find N5 audio analysis

Oppo Find N3 audio analysis

电池续航时间 - Oppo Find N5 充电迅速

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池运行时间

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Possible alternatives compared

More articles related to this device

Transparency