英特尔酷睿i7-1255U首次亮相。戴尔Inspiron 14 7420二合一敞篷车评测
戴尔Inspiron 14 7420二合一产品直接取代了去年的16：9 灵感14 7400或7415二合一，引入了全新的16:10机箱设计和英特尔第12代Alder Lake-U处理器选项。事实上，它是首批配备此类英特尔CPU的消费机型之一。与更专业的Latitude 系列或旗舰XPS系列不同，Inspiron系列的目标是学生和预算更紧张的休闲家庭或办公室用户。
我们的测试机是一个较高端的配置，配备酷睿i7-1255U处理器，集成Iris Xe显卡，以及16GB DDR4内存，零售价约1050美元。其他SKU有酷睿i3-1215U、i5-1235U，甚至还有独立的GeForce MX550图形，以及通常的内存和存储变化。所有选项都有相同的16：10 FHD+触摸屏，没有其他面板选择。
Inspiron 14 7420二合一的替代品包括其他预算到中档的14英寸转换机，如 Acer Spin 3, 戴尔 Inspiron 14 5410, 联想IdeaPad Flex 5, 华硕VivoBook Flip 14, 或 惠普Pavilion x360 14.戴尔提供AMD版本的这种相同的机箱设计，称为Inspiron 14 7425 2合1。
更多戴尔评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.86 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 89 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 13.94 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 89.5 % v7 (old) | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | ||
| 89.8 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
箱子 - 麦拉尔掌垫
从外观上看，改造后的机箱设计与即将推出的Inspiron 7400系列非常不同。例如，后部的通风格栅现在尺寸更长，而边缘则是更多的矩形而不是圆形。键盘甲板现在也更平坦，看起来更干净。今年该系列的新产品是横跨掌托和点击板的光滑半透明胶膜，比其他标准的塑料和铝制表面更耐刮擦和其他表面损伤。
底座的刚性一般，但盖子的刚性很强。试图将底座或盖子扭转到它们各自的角落，结果只是轻微的扭曲，没有吱吱作响，给人以良好的第一印象。在键盘中心或外盖上按下，其表面的翘曲程度比惠普Spectre x360 14等价格较高的机型要严重。
与即将推出的Inspiron 14 7410相比，由于采用了新的16:10外形尺寸，7420既宽又短。同时，两种设计之间的重量和高度几乎保持不变。像latitude 9420二合一、Zenbook Flip 14和惠普Spectre x360 14这样价格较高的替代品都比我们的7420更小、更轻。
连接性 - 不支持Thunderbolt
对于一台次笔记本的可转换性来说，端口选项很好。我们特别欣赏集成的HDMI端口，因为许多竞争对手都缺乏这个选项。然而，请记住，这里的两个USB-C端口只支持数据传输、电源传输和DisplayPort；没有Thunderbolt可用。
HDMI端口只有1.4版本，这意味着60FPS的4K视频输出只能通过USB-C来实现。
SD卡阅读器
SD读卡器的传输速度很慢。从我们的UHS-II测试卡中移动1GB的图片需要50秒，而在戴尔XPS 15上则需要6或7秒。读卡器不是弹簧式的，所以插入的卡仍然突出了一半以上的长度。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
通信 - 兼容Wi-Fi 6E
英特尔AX211是英特尔Wi-Fi 6E连接的标准配置。当与我们的6GHz网络配对时，我们经历了一个稳定的连接，但传输速率并不一定比普通的Wi-Fi 6快。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
网络摄像头
摄像头是1080p的，而不是720p的，比其他大多数经济型笔记本电脑的画面更清晰。然而，颜色仍然相对较差。
没有红外摄像头，因此不支持Windows Hello。内置一个物理相机快门，以增加隐私。
维护
底部面板由7颗飞利浦螺钉固定，便于维修。电池、2个SODIMM插槽和M.2 2280插槽都可以使用。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外，零售箱中没有任何额外的东西。一个可选的PN5122W 手写笔，供平板电脑模式用户使用。
在美国购买时，标准的一年有限保修期适用，如果直接从戴尔购买，则有大量的延长选项。
输入设备--反馈可以更有力
键盘
键盘布局与Inspiron 14 7415二合一的键盘保持一致，尽管机箱经过了重新设计。打字的体验是令人满意的，而且咔哒声最小，但有点软的反馈需要适应。特别是软的空格键，如果能按得更紧，反馈就会更强。
触摸板
Precision 点击板相对较大（约11.5 x 8厘米），比上一代机型的点击板大14%。与大多数其他笔记本电脑上的点击板不同，其顶部边缘采用了风格化设计，与周围的掌托融为一体。牵引力在中高速时是平稳的，而较慢的速度则倾向于坚持更准确的点击或拖放。
在点击板上点击需要很大的力气，这可能会使它在使用一段时间后感到疲惫。反馈并不像我们希望的那样强烈，行程也很浅。你会想在较长时间内使用一个外部鼠标。
显示屏--清晰，但色彩还原有限
Inspiron 14 7420二合一的16:10 14英寸京东方NV14N42 IPS面板是第一次出现在我们的数据库中，因为上一代16:9的Inspiron 14 7400将使用奇美面板代替。然而，无论好坏，除了更大的16:10长宽比之外，京东方的面板似乎并没有比老的奇美面板提供多少东西。不幸的是，关键属性，如对比度、色彩、亮度和响应时间，在两代Inspiron之间没有改善。如果这些显示功能对你的日常工作负荷很重要，那么你仍然需要考虑戴尔的一个更高端的选择，而不是像XPS 13 2合1或Latitude9420二合一.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 259.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 657:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.13
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
39.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.05
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 BOE NV14N42, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 Chi Mei 140HCA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W SDC4154, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Samsung SDC4148, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Lenovo LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 96% | 11% | 128% | 126% | 128% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.6 | 80.7 109% | 42.5 10% | 99.7 158% | 99.9 159% | 99.8 159% |
| sRGB Coverage | 56.2 | 100 78% | 63.1 12% | 100 78% | 100 78% | 100 78% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.9 | 79.7 100% | 44 10% | 98.6 147% | 96.1 141% | 98.7 147% |
| Response Times | -79% | -20% | 92% | 92% | 95% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27.2 ? | 54 ? -99% | 28.8 ? -6% | 2 ? 93% | 2 ? 93% | 1.2 ? 96% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 20.8 ? | 32.8 ? -58% | 27.6 ? -33% | 2 ? 90% | 2 ? 90% | 1.2 ? 94% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 347.2 ? | ||||
| Screen | 55% | 1% | 40% | 659% | 36% | |
| Brightness middle | 269.4 | 483.6 80% | 262.7 -2% | 366 36% | 370 37% | 367.3 36% |
| Brightness | 260 | 465 79% | 245 -6% | 369 42% | 374 44% | 369 42% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 92 3% | 84 -6% | 96 8% | 90 1% | 97 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.32 22% | 0.37 10% | 0.01 98% | ||
| Contrast | 657 | 1511 130% | 710 8% | 37000 5532% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.53 | 3.69 43% | 6.23 5% | 2.84 57% | 2.57 61% | 5.2 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.76 | 5.97 70% | 22.62 -14% | 5.29 73% | 4.52 77% | 8.04 59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.13 | 2.05 35% | 1.8 42% | 2.81 10% | 2.31 26% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 3.5 35% | 7.1 -31% | 2.32 57% | 2.2 59% | 2.8 48% |
| Gamma | 2.05 107% | 2.04 108% | 2.22 99% | 2.44 90% | 2.36 93% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6007 108% | 6158 106% | 6241 104% | 6170 105% | 6154 106% | 5992 108% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 85.8 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 24% /
45% | -3% /
-0% | 87% /
71% | 292% /
464% | 86% /
72% |
* ... smaller is better
这款显示器在开箱后没有得到很好的校准，这对于一款sRGB覆盖范围有限的经济型中档敞篷车来说是可以预期的。平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值可以通过校准分别提高到3.4和3.1，但狭窄的色域对它们能走多远有一个硬性限制。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
我们通常期望可转换笔记本电脑有更明亮的显示屏，以便在户外观看时更加舒适，但不幸的是，Inspiron的显示屏比同尺寸类别中的大多数其他产品更暗。如果你想要更亮的东西，你必须花更多钱购买Latitude 、Spectre或Zenbook。
性能--新的英特尔第12代选项
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前，我们的设备通过 "我的戴尔 "软件被设置为Windows性能模式和戴尔超性能模式，以获得可能的最高分数。建议熟悉 "我的戴尔"，因为重要的电池和电源功能是在这里切换的。它有效地取代了旧一代机型上的戴尔电源管理器软件。
处理器 - 比第11代酷睿i7-1165G7更快
CPU的性能非常好，多线程结果介于11代的 酷睿i7-1165G7去年超极本上非常流行的第11代酷睿i7-1165G7和较新的第12代 酷睿i7-1260P.同时，单线程性能基本上与Core i7-1260P持平，尽管它们的TDP水平不同。当与8核心的 Ryzen 7 5800U时， 酷睿i7-1255U在单线程和多线程工作负载中分别更快和更慢。
性能的可持续性非常好，在长时间承受极端的处理器压力时，时钟速率没有大的下滑。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (2095 - 3702, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (550 - 682, n=10) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (5269 - 9628, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (1408 - 1775, n=10) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (919 - 1577, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (161 - 251, n=11) | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (372 - 601, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (24126 - 37365, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (5059 - 5529, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (4463 - 8821, n=11) | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (1560 - 1712, n=11) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (6.31 - 10.1, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (44.5 - 52.5, n=10) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (0.4688 - 0.558, n=10) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (4313 - 8127, n=10) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (19813 - 41353, n=10) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (1325 - 2135, n=10) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (61375 - 65892, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (3577 - 5095, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (11759 - 20187, n=10) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (27900 - 67458, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (393 - 640, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (2474 - 4400, n=10) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (13899 - 44054, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
系统性能
PCMark结果与许多采用第11代酷睿i7-1165G7的价格较高的高端机型不相上下，包括Latitude 9420二合一或 HP Spectre x360 14.尽管使用了U系列CPU，而不是更快的P系列，但系统导航并没有感觉到任何减慢。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4676 - 5523, n=9) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9381 - 11654, n=9) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6530 - 7418, n=9) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4498 - 6203, n=9) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1329 - 1573, n=9) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1364 - 1554, n=9) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1372 - 1660, n=9) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1117 - 1434, n=9) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5271 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22846 - 67017, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22877 - 67398, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22883 - 65839, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1255U (76 - 163.2, n=10) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon揭示了在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在我们的测试中，4K视频在60FPS下的播放很流畅，只有一个丢帧。CPU和GPU利用率分别稳定在9%和43%。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 多达一个M.2 2280驱动器
我们的测试装置配备了 WDC PC SN530这是一款中档的PCIe3 x4 NVMe固态硬盘。与三星PM981a等高端型号的3000多MB/s相比，传输率可以接近2500MB/s。然而，对于像Inspiron这样的中端机型，WDC PC SN530已经足够了。
正如下面的DiskSpd循环图所示，我们在Inspiron中的硬盘表现出在长时间内保持最大传输率的问题。由于散热性能差，读取率会在1800MB/s和2500MB/s之间节流。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - Iris Xe回归
图形性能比平均水平慢5%到20%左右 Iris Xe 96 EUs在我们的数据库中。最值得注意的是，我们这里的GPU可能比在联想Yoga 9 14IAP7它配备了相同的集成GPU，但有一个更强大的Core i7-1260P处理器。尽管Inspiron不是一台游戏机，但在较低的图形设置下，Inspiron仍足以满足DOTA 2或Fortnite 等普通低要求的游戏。我们建议尽可能配置双通道内存，否则GPU性能将被进一步削弱。
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=202) | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6092 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17872 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3612 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1518 points | |
Help | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=183) | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.5 - 31.2, n=179) | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.15 - 27.8, n=172) | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 | |
| 1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13.4 - 88.4, n=212) | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.6 - 69.5, n=213) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
| 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.1 - 59.8, n=212) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen1 20S40009GE | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 83.7 | 67.4 | 14.2 | 6.31 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 78.2 | 49 | 25.3 | 12.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 108.7 | 76.7 | 51.3 | 46.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 34.2 | 17.6 | 12.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 52.4 | 39.2 | 35.4 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 75.3 | 30.2 | 25.2 | 20.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 17.6 | 14.6 | 10.9 | 7.4 |
排放
系统噪音
在大多数低度到中度负载期间，风扇噪音保持安静。例如，当运行3DMark 06的第一个基准场景时，风扇噪音将稳定在27.7 dB(A)左右，而安静的背景是23 dB(A)。这比我们在Yoga 9 14IAP7或Spectre x360 14等其他转换设备上观察到的要安静得多，但请记住，如果配置独立的GeForce MX550图形，风扇噪音可能会更大。
当运行游戏等要求较高的负载时，风扇噪音往往在38至45 dB(A)之间循环，而不是稳定地保持在一个固定的转速。对于一台14英寸的敞篷车来说，这个最大值不仅比预期的要大，而且循环行为使风扇更加明显，难以被忽视。这通常不是一个问题，除非你打算经常运行高要求的负载。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 27.7 / 45.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) | ||
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W Vega 8, R7 5800H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H) | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 1% | -12% | -7% | -0% | |
| off / environment * | 23.1 | 25.4 -10% | 24.3 -5% | 26 -13% | 26 -13% | 22.9 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 25.4 -3% | 24.3 2% | 26 -5% | 26 -5% | 23.3 6% |
| Idle Average * | 24.7 | 25.4 -3% | 24.3 2% | 26 -5% | 26 -5% | 23.5 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.7 | 25.4 -3% | 24.3 2% | 27.3 -11% | 26 -5% | 23.5 5% |
| Load Average * | 27.7 | 25.4 8% | 35.7 -29% | 39.8 -44% | 37.5 -35% | 33.2 -20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.1 | 41.3 8% | 37.5 17% | 44.9 -0% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 45.1 | 41.3 8% | 37.3 17% | 42.4 6% | 36.3 20% | 44.6 1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘中心和底板在承受超过一小时的苛刻应用时，可以分别达到38℃和46℃。结果与我们在戴尔Inspiron 14 7415上观察到的相似，同时比竞争者的平均温度要低。华硕VivoBook Flip 14.值得庆幸的是，无论屏幕上的负荷有多大，掌托和机箱前部的温度都不会让人不舒服。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+3 °C / 5.4 F).
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -7% | -6% | -18% | 0% | -17% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38.2 | 43.4 -14% | 39.4 -3% | 42.7 -12% | 37.1 3% | 43.2 -13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45.6 | 48 -5% | 51 -12% | 53.1 -16% | 43.1 5% | 45.6 -0% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.4 | 29.8 -9% | 26.2 4% | 32.9 -20% | 29 -6% | 34.6 -26% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.4 | 28 1% | 32.4 -14% | 35.2 -24% | 28.6 -1% | 37 -30% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当用Prime95测试时，CPU会在最初几秒钟内提升到3.6GHz，然后达到92C的核心温度。此后，时钟频率会下降并稳定在2.4GHz，以保持68C的较低核心温度。对于任何一台次笔记本电脑的可转换性来说，长时间保持高Turbo Boost时钟速率是非常罕见的，Inspiron也不例外。在LG Gram 14T90P上进行同样的测试 LG Gram 14T90P采用较慢的第11代酷睿i5-1135G7，会导致核心温度略高，为73℃，但CPU封装功率较低，为18W。
集成的GPU在运行时稳定在1147MHz和69℃。 Witcher 3这与我们在联想Yoga 9 14或前面提到的LG Gram上观察到的情况接近。
在电池上运行限制了CPU和GPU的性能。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试，物理和图形分数分别为11614和3210分，而在主电源上则为15185和3887分。
| CPU时钟（GHz） | GPU时钟（MHz） | CPU平均温度（°C） | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 45 |
| Prime95压力 | 2.4 | -- | 68 |
| Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 1.5 | 798 | 63 |
| Witcher 3 应力 | 2.1 | 1147 | 69 |
发言人
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 与第11代英特尔U系列类似
消耗功率
总体功耗非常接近我们在去年的Latitude 9420 2-in-1上观察到的情况，即使我们的12代CPU可以提供更快的处理器性能，但图形性能稍慢。Yoga 9 14IAP7及其更快的Core i7-1260P在运行高要求的负载时，将比我们的U系列动力Inspiron多出约50%至70%的功率，每瓦性能略低。
与最高亮度设置相比，在最低亮度设置下运行系统将节省约3瓦。
在同时运行Prime95和FurMark时，我们能够从小型（约11.1 x 5.1 x 2.7厘米）的65瓦USB-C交流适配器中记录到62.5瓦的临时最大功耗。
| Off / Standby | 0.48 / 1 Watt |
| Idle | 5.2 / 8.2 / 9.9 Watt |
| Load |
44.4 / 62.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H), OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | 16% | -21% | -4% | -44% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 4.6 12% | 4.5 13% | 6.4 -23% | 6.3 -21% | 8 -54% |
| Idle Average * | 8.2 | 7.8 5% | 6.5 21% | 9.4 -15% | 11.2 -37% | 14 -71% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.9 | 8.2 17% | 7.1 28% | 10.7 -8% | 13.3 -34% | 14.4 -45% |
| Load Average * | 44.4 | 47.9 -8% | 40.4 9% | 52.2 -18% | 32 28% | 59.6 -34% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35 | 38.8 -11% | 31.7 9% | 53 -51% | 53.6 -53% | |
| Load Maximum * | 62.5 | 87.1 -39% | 54.3 13% | 69 -10% | 35.6 43% | 68.1 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命 - 全天候工作
当使用平衡电源配置文件时，预计实际的无线网络使用时间约为7.5小时，这比我们在Inspiron 14 7415二合一AMD版本上的记录短了几个小时。电池容量为54Wh，对于一个中档可转换产品来说，与惠普Spectre x360 14这样的高端机型相比，电池容量是平均水平。华硕ZenBook Flip 14或联想Yoga 9 14IAP7有较大的电池组。还计划使用较小的41Wh电池的SKU。
从空电到满电大约需要1小时45分钟。用户可以用几乎所有的USB-C交流适配器进行充电，包括XPS型号所带的适配器。
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 54 Wh | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8, 54 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8, 63 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 50% | 22% | 7% | 3% | -11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 954 | 1721 80% | 1115 17% | 803 -16% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 455 | 699 54% | 647 42% | 522 15% | 466 2% | 405 -11% |
| Load | 127 | 146 15% | 137 8% | 124 -2% | 157 24% | |
| H.264 | 542 | 666 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 坚实的，有一些注意事项的
Inspiron 7420二合一的显著品质包括16:10的长宽比、坚固的铰链、带有可选的GeForce MX图形的第12代英特尔CPU，以及易于维修的特点。这些功能通常要比竞争厂商的高端产品多花几百美元。因此，对于希望获得最大性价比的用户来说，其价值主张相对较高。
Inspiron 14 9420二合一电脑为这个价格提供了很多价值，并提供了许多现代功能，包括16:10、Wi-Fi 6E和英特尔最新的12代CPU。然而，触摸屏的有限色彩空间可能会使大多数编辑感到失望。
需要记住的缺点是缺乏对Thunderbolt的支持，显示屏亮度一般，固态硬盘性能差，sRGB覆盖范围窄。特别是性能猎手会发现这些挫折比大多数家庭或办公室用户更令人担忧。如果你打算经常在户外使用这款笔记本，那么可能值得考虑更明亮的替代品，如三星Galaxy Book2 Pro 360 13或戴尔Latitude 9420 2合1.
价格和可用性
Inspiron 7420二合一产品还没有通过亚马逊等转售商广泛销售。用户可以直接从戴尔购买https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-laptops/inspiron-14-2-in-1/spd/inspiron-14-7420-2-in-1-laptop/nn7420fmzms起价为850美元，我们的具体配置最高为1050美元。
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
- 06/13/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
