Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Poco F6

小米 Poco F6 评测--这款中端智能手机非常适合注重价格的买家

为什么要花很多钱？

Poco 智能手机的传统特点是性价比高。Poco F6 也没有偏离这一模式：只需不到 400 欧元，您就能买到一款速度极快的中端手机，配备 120 Hz AMOLED 屏幕、5000 万像素摄像头和 90 瓦快速充电功能。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米子公司 Poco 推出了一款快速中端智能手机 F6，这款手机应该具有该品牌典型的良好性价比。这款 6.67 英寸智能手机的官方售价为 450 欧元，配备骁龙 8s Gen 3 处理器、5000 万像素主摄像头、120 Hz AMOLED 面板和 90 瓦充电功能。

与价格高出 180 欧元的姊妹机型相比 Poco F6 Pro对于一些买家来说，Poco F6 可能是更有趣的智能手机，而不仅仅是在价格方面。至于性能，这两款 6.67 英寸的设备几乎不相上下，在功能方面也很相似。Poco F6 甚至在某些方面更胜一筹。

Xiaomi Poco F6 (Poco F6 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 8 x 2 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 735
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, brightness 500/2400 nits (typ./peak), Gorilla Glass Victus, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 480 Hz touch sampling rate, 2160 Hz instant touch sampling rate, 1920 Hz PWM dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 489 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Ambient light sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, IR blaster, Gyroscope, X-axis linear vibration motor, Dolby Atmos certification, Hi-Res Audio certification, Hi-Res Wireless Audio certification
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/38/40/41/42/48/66), 5G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/48/66/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 160.5 x 74.4
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 90W max. charging speed (4.5V/20A)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX882, f/1.59, 1.6 m pixel size) + 8 MP ultrawide (Sony IMX335), video recording up to 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (Omnivision OV20B, f/2.2), video recording up to 1080p@60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 90W charger, USB-C cable, SIM Eject Tool, Protective Case, Safety Information, Quick Start Guide and Warranty Card, HyperOS 1.0, 24 Months Warranty, Head SAR 0.995 W/kg, Body SAR 0.997 W/kg, Camera2 API Level 3, fanless
Weight
179 g, Power Supply: 100 g
Price
500 Euro
Amazon
$349.99
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
82.2 %v8
08 / 2024
Xiaomi Poco F6
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735		179 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2712x1220
81.9 %v8
07 / 2024
Google Pixel 8a
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
88.2 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
07 / 2023
OnePlus Nord 3
Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10		193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.74"2772x1240
87.4 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530		213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080
77.3 %v8
08 / 2024
Sony Xperia 10 VI
SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710		164 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.10"2520x1080
86.1 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6		186 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2712x1220

机箱 - Poco F6，轻质塑料机箱

Poco F6 依靠的是塑料外壳，因此必须将其与 Poco F6 Pro相比，Poco F6 Pro 采用了玻璃边框和金属后壳。另一方面，"小巧 "的 Poco 具有重量优势，179 克（F6 Pro：209 克）的重量对于一款 6.67 英寸的智能手机来说非常轻。IP64 防护等级并不能使其防水，但可以防止溅水。

Poco F6 的 AMOLED 面板由大猩猩胜利玻璃保护，显示屏边框很窄，标配保护膜。背面四角和边缘略呈圆形，由于采用了磨砂表面，因此几乎不会沾染指纹，在我们的绿色配色中，入射光会反射出轻微的闪光，看起来非常别致。其他可选颜色有黑色和钛色。

Poco F6 没有摄像头驼峰。主摄像头和超广角摄像头从做工精良的机身上突出约 3 毫米，导致智能手机在平面上摇摆不定。

小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6

尺寸比较

❌
162.6 mm 75.1 mm 8.1 mm 193.5 g161.1 mm 77.4 mm 8.2 mm 213 g160.45 mm 74.34 mm 8.25 mm 186 g160.5 mm 74.4 mm 7.8 mm 179 g155 mm 68 mm 8.3 mm 164 g152.2 mm 72.7 mm 8.9 mm 188 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 高达 12GB RAM 和 512GB 内存

Poco 提供两种内存版本的智能手机，均采用快速 LPDDR5X 内存和快速 UFS 4.0 内存。大容量版本的价格相当吸引人，因为只需多花 50 欧元，就能获得两倍的存储空间。

  • 8 GB 内存 + 256 GB 内存：建议零售价 450 欧元
  • 12 GB 内存 + 512 GB 存储器：建议零售价 500 欧元

其他设备都是标准配置：有一个用于非接触式支付的 NFC 模块、一个用于远程控制兼容终端设备的红外爆破器和一个支持 USB 2.0 的 USB-C 端口。不过，使用我们的外置固态硬盘三星 980 Pro 进行的拷贝测试失败了。可激活始终开启的显示屏，但点击后仅显示 10 秒钟。只有Poco F6 Pro 提供永久激活的 Always-On-Display 功能。

左：无连接
左：无连接
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
顶部：扬声器、红外热像仪、麦克风
顶部：扬声器、红外热像仪、麦克风
底部：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、双 SIM 卡
底部：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、双 SIM 卡

软件 - Poco F6，含Android 14 和 4 年更新

Poco F6 运行基于Android 14 的小米 HyperOS。Poco 承诺在 3 年内提供操作系统升级，还希望在 4 年内为其智能手机提供安全更新。在 8 月中旬测试时，Poco F6 收到了 HyperOS 1.0.7.0 的更新，该更新将Android 安全补丁的状态提升至 2024 年 8 月。

Poco F6 随后还将通过 OTA 更新获得各种 AI 功能。目前，AI 生成字幕和 AI 图像引擎已经可用，可以对视频进行升频和 HDR 效果编辑。借助照片应用中的魔法编辑器，您可以移动、删除或调整图片中对象的大小。

小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6
小米 Poco F6

可持续性

通过网站购买时，Poco 提供以旧换新计划。智能手机的包装几乎不使用塑料。此外，设备本身和附带的保护套都用可堆肥薄膜包裹，而包装的其他部分则由纸板制成。Poco 没有提供任何关于材料提取或可回收性的信息。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 6E 和许多移动电话频段

Poco F6 支持 WiFi 6E，在与我们的参考路由器华硕 OG Rapture GT-AXE11000 的无线局域网测试中表现比 Poco F6 Pro.在测试中，后者不愿连接到 6 GHz 频段，而 Poco F6 却能顺利连接。此外，它的 WLAN 速度也比对比设备更快，并通过稳定的数据传输凸显了这一点。

在移动无线电频率方面，Poco F6 的定位也优于 Poco F6 Pro。它拥有总共 44 个手机频段，包括 18 个 4G 频段和 15 个 5G 频段，在全球范围内的使用也比它的姐妹机型更灵活，后者拥有 38 个手机频段。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco F6
iperf3 receive AXE11000
830 (min: 800) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
897 (min: 597) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1331 (min: 654) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1554 (min: 1445) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 8a
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
856 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
521 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
754 (min: 611) MBit/s ∼49%
OnePlus Nord 3
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1581 (min: 1484) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1488 (min: 1308) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼49%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
iperf3 receive AXE11000
657 (min: 636) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
718 (min: 352) MBit/s ∼48%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
861 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
812 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼55%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼89%
0851702553404255105956807658509351020110511901275136014451530Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1310 (654-1470)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1553 (1445-1607)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (800-849)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (704-841)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø897 (597-972)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø735 (671-791)
楼内 GPS 接收
楼内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

Poco F6 通过 GPS、Glonass、Galileo、Beidou 和 QZSS 卫星导航服务查找当前位置，这些服务都是单频的，速度相当快。

在自行车骑行中，这款智能手机证明了它也非常适合导航。与对比中的 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相比，虽然精度不高，但 GPS 精度足以满足日常使用。

GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：环湖航行
GPS 测试：环湖航行
GPS 测试：转折点
GPS 测试：转折点

电话功能和语音质量 - 双卡双待，无 eSIM 卡

Poco F6 支持双卡双待，支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。Poco 智能手机的语音质量很好。声音传输清晰，背景噪音被有效过滤。在免提模式下，清晰度仍然很高。

摄像头 - Poco F6 配备 5000 万像素主摄像头

自拍相机拍摄的照片
自拍相机拍摄的照片

从外观上看，Poco F6 的相机模组与 Poco F6 Pro 的相机模组几乎没有共同之处。 Poco F6 Pro相似。两款智能手机都配备了带光学防抖功能的 5000 万像素主摄像头和 800 万像素超广角摄像头。只有 Poco F6 没有配备姊妹机型的 200 万像素微距摄像头。

在自拍摄像头（Omnivision OV20B）方面，Poco F6 甚至更胜一筹，因为它提供了比 Poco F6 Pro（1600 万像素）更高的 2000 万像素分辨率。自拍摄像头在测试中表现出色，在各种光线条件下都能提供稳定的效果。它能以 60 FPS 的速度录制高达 1080p 的视频。

Poco F6 的主摄像头采用索尼 IMX882 图像传感器，光圈为 f/1.59，标配 4 合 1 像素分档，可拍摄 1200 万像素照片。在光线条件良好的情况下，它能拍摄出美丽的图像，其高动态范围和鲜艳逼真的色彩令人印象深刻。主摄像头在弱光条件下也表现出色。Poco F6 Pro 的成像质量略好于 Poco F6 Pro，这要归功于它采用了质量更高的索尼传感器，但差距并不大。

800 万像素超广角摄像头（索尼 IMX355）明显不如主摄像头。其照片不是特别清晰，图像边缘明显失真。

主摄像头可录制最高 60 FPS 的 4K 视频，质量不错。不过，光学防抖功能最高只能以 30 FPS 的速度拍摄 1080p 的视频。如果您激活 HDR10+ 进行拍摄，也只能以最高 30 FPS 的速度拍摄。

主摄像头拍摄的照片
主摄像头拍摄的照片
主摄像头拍摄的照片
主摄像头拍摄的照片
主摄像头拍摄的照片
主摄像头拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
12.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F6: 8.43 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 14.88 ∆E
ColorChecker
21 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
25 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F6: 24.91 ∆E min: 13.31 - max: 34.72 ∆E

配件和保修 - 供货范围广

Poco 为其智能手机配备了大量配件。包装包括一个 90 瓦的电源适配器、一条 USB-C 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一个保护盖。

Poco F6 在欧盟享有 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 日常使用非常快速

搭载 骁龙 8s 第三代处理器、120 Hz AMOLED 面板和至少 8GB 内存，Poco F6 的系统运行速度很高。出厂时的屏幕保护膜感觉有些暗淡，但这在使用过程中并不是什么大问题。

位于显示屏下方的指纹传感器在解锁智能手机时没有明显的延迟。在足够明亮的环境光线下，这也适用于二维面部识别，作为第二种生物识别认证方法。X 轴振动电机可提供精确的反馈。

纵向键盘
纵向键盘
横向键盘
横向键盘

显示屏 - AMOLED 面板，120 赫兹

子像素结构
子像素结构
亮度为 14% 时，PWM 闪烁频率为 1818 Hz
亮度为 14% 时，PWM 闪烁频率为 1818 Hz

6.67 英寸 120 Hz AMOLED 面板的分辨率为 2712 x 1220 像素，没有 Poco F6 Pro 的分辨率高。 Poco F6 Pro(3200 x 1440 像素）高。像素密度为 446 PPI，显示屏在清晰度方面仍无懈可击。

据说 AMOLED 面板的最大亮度可达 2400 cd/m²（Poco F6 Pro：4000 cd/m²）。在测试中，当显示 HDR 内容时，它也几乎达到了制造商的规格，为 2276 cd/m²。在显示 SDR 内容并激活环境光传感器的情况下，我们测得的最高亮度为 1191 cd/m²。在没有传感器的情况下，最高可达到 516 cd/m²。

在屏幕闪烁方面，我们使用 Rigol 软件测得的频率为 60 Hz，这可能是由于 BFI（黑框插入）造成的。我们手动测量的结果是，在最低亮度下频率为 500 Hz。只有当亮度超过 14% 时，才会达到 1818 Hz，这与 Poco 承诺的 1920 Hz PWM 调光频率非常接近。然而，在黑暗环境中，PWM 频率非常低，尽管振幅相对平缓，但敏感的人可能会感到不适。

1024
cd/m²		1031
cd/m²		1055
cd/m²
1016
cd/m²		1031
cd/m²		1052
cd/m²
1008
cd/m²		1019
cd/m²		1019
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1055 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1028.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.93 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1031 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Poco F6
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Google Pixel 8a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"		OnePlus Nord 3
AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Sony Xperia 10 VI
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"		Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
23%
-18%
9%
21%
21%
Brightness middle
1031
1518
47%
481
-53%
962
-7%
1010
-2%
1034
0%
Brightness
1028
1466
43%
478
-54%
967
-6%
1012
-2%
1035
1%
Brightness Distribution
96
88
-8%
91
-5%
99
3%
97
1%
96
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
1.2
14%
1.4
-0%
1.6
-14%
1
29%
1.1
21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.7
3.3
11%
3.87
-5%
2.6
30%
2.1
43%
1.9
49%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
2
31%
2.6
10%
1.5
48%
1.3
55%
1.4
52%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.2 100%
2.28 96%
2.13 103%
2.3 96%
2.22 99%
CCT
6560 99%
6786 96%
6395 102%
6382 102%
6539 99%
6674 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 37.51 %

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列 (最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

AMOLED 面板的画质很好。如果需要尽可能精确的图像参数，最好使用原色专业色彩模式，并将色温设置为暖色。屏幕覆盖 99.1% 的 sRGB 色彩空间。

色彩保真度（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩保真度（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案为 Pro 原色，色温为暖色，目标色彩空间为 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案为 Pro 原色，色温为暖色，目标色彩空间为 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8455 ms rise
↘ 0.8445 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.741 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.789 ms rise
↘ 0.952 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于屏幕明亮、可视角度稳定，Poco F6 也可以在户外使用。只要避免阳光直射显示屏，就不会有任何问题。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 配备骁龙 8s 第 3 代处理器的 Poco F6

Poco 为其智能手机配备了 骁龙 8s 第 3 代的智能手机。在性能方面，这颗八核 SoC 介于 骁龙 8 代 2和 骁龙 8 代 3使 Poco F6 成为速度最快的中端手机之一。Poco F6 Pro Poco F6 Pro实际上也一样快。快速的 UFS 4.0 内存也为系统的高性能做出了贡献，这是大多数竞争对手无法比拟的。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1930 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1821 - 2012, n=6)
1916 Points -1%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1699 Points -12%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1608 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1424 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points -40%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
948 Points -51%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (4602 - 5284, n=6)
4906 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4876 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4547 Points -7%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
4482 Points -8%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4408 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points -29%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2896 Points -41%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1479 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1329 - 1498, n=6)
1436 Points -3%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1267 Points -14%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1211 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1085 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
891 Points -40%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4557 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (3980 - 4746, n=6)
4318 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4279 Points -6%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
4051 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3366 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3349 Points -27%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1508271 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1465265 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1142944 - 1553057, n=6)
1414338 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1049981 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
740935 Points -51%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
564247 Points -63%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (15547 - 19083, n=6)
17045 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15547 Points
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
14915 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14716 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -15%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11565 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
9887 Points -36%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1127 Points
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1051 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
987 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (771 - 1155, n=6)
961 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -18%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
919 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
784 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
698 Points -38%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8810 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5685 - 9147, n=6)
7738 Points -12%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
7714 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7122 Points -19%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7088 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)
6460 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4964 Points -44%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4356 Points -51%
System
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13008 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (9875 - 13391, n=6)
12187 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
12177 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
11778 Points -9%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
11650 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)
10308 Points -21%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
9878 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7828 Points -40%
Memory
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9837 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9774 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5456 - 10977, n=6)
7838 Points -20%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7784 Points -20%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
7602 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)
7016 Points -28%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4783 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4109 Points -58%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
26226 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (8020 - 29006, n=6)
22941 Points -13%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
20494 Points -22%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18837 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)
17782 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
16594 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8511 Points -68%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
5662 Points -78%
Web
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1951 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1806 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1762 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1534 - 1893, n=6)
1744 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1636 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)
1574 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1474 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
1398 Points -23%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
64597 Points +315%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
29654 Points +91%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
29236 Points +88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15559 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (13576 - 15572, n=5)
14536 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
8191 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5205 Points -67%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
33858 Points +2762%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
28688 Points +2325%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +2040%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1183 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (946 - 1321, n=6)
1161 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
585 Points -51%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
Points -100%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
Points -100%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
998 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
975 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (564 - 1051, n=5)
878 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points -15%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
267 Points -73%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
908 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (414 - 967, n=5)
773 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points -18%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
704 Points -22%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
255 Points -72%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
2488 Points +308%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
610 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (273 - 955, n=5)
577 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
532 Points -13%

其 Adreno 735GPU 的推动下，Poco F6 也成为图形基准测试中速度最快的中端智能手机之一。正如 GFXBench 测试显示的那样，Poco 手机在流畅渲染图形要求较高的游戏时也毫无问题。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3085 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3004 Points
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2385 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2353 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 Points -70%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
599 Points -80%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3078 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3068 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2373 Points -23%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2359 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
926 Points -70%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
613 Points -80%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12149 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11204 Points -8%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8960 Points -26%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8667 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3992 Points -67%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2403 Points -80%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5188 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5071 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6342 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5850 Points +42%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5193 Points +26%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4332 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4126 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3005 Points -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19756 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14498 Points -27%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14348 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13159 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7170 Points -64%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4572 Points -77%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10726 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10622 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10309 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7856 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6828 Points -36%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4976 Points -54%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -7%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
464 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
462 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
373 fps -20%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
297 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps -71%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
116 fps -75%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -32%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -51%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241 fps +14%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
218 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
211 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -55%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps -70%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -13%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -50%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -76%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
171 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
170 fps -1%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps -10%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -61%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps -74%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps +12%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -56%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -75%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +11%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -18%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -64%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -77%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps +10%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -55%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -77%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -10%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -60%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -79%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +2%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -9%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -53%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -74%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps +12%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -15%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -60%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -76%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22 fps
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -14%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps -64%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.5 fps -80%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1041 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
989 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
200 Points -81%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1080 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
201 Points -81%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
210.192 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (59.7 - 235, n=6)
154.2 Points -27%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
148.56 Points -29%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
134.031 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
131.393 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -41%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
94.765 Points -55%
Sony Xperia 10 VI (Chrome 126)
69.562 Points -67%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
236 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (65.9 - 247, n=6)
182 runs/min -23%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
180 runs/min -24%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
161 runs/min -32%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
151 runs/min -36%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min -39%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
116 runs/min -51%
Sony Xperia 10 VI (Chrome 126)
70.9 runs/min -70%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
183 Points
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
153 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (61 - 185, n=6)
144.8 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
140 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
126 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -36%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
95 Points -48%
Sony Xperia 10 VI (Chrome 126)
70 Points -62%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
65175 Points
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
50714 Points -22%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
46738 Points -28%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
46286 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (28536 - 66369, n=6)
45299 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
41576 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -41%
Sony Xperia 10 VI (Chrome 126)
25784 Points -60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -153%
Sony Xperia 10 VI (Chrome 126)
1187.5 ms * -97%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
1012.6 ms * -68%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
1007.2 ms * -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (603 - 1456, n=6)
910 ms * -51%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
886.7 ms * -47%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
847.9 ms * -41%
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
602.7 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco F6Google Pixel 8aOnePlus Nord 3Samsung Galaxy A55 5GSony Xperia 10 VIXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-59%
-28%
-46%
-44%
12%
8%
-34%
Sequential Read 256KB
4103.79
1509.65
-63%
1617.78
-61%
1688.53
-59%
963.31
-77%
3824.7
-7%
3651 ?(1851 - 4512, n=35)
-11%
1882 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years)
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB
3143.04
255.31
-92%
1525.8
-51%
831.44
-74%
876.95
-72%
3642.57
16%
3024 ?(1524 - 3889, n=35)
-4%
1467 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years)
-53%
Random Read 4KB
312.22
165.98
-47%
308.68
-1%
351.47
13%
289.03
-7%
355.7
14%
388 ?(250 - 480, n=35)
24%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years)
-11%
Random Write 4KB
373.77
243.82
-35%
376.9
1%
132.11
-65%
306.61
-18%
467.74
25%
462 ?(45.7 - 709, n=35)
24%
310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years)
-17%
No graph data

排放 - 立体声扬声器，音质纯正

温度

如果压力过大，Poco F6 在运行过程中会变得相当热。经过一个小时的烧机基准压力测试后，我们测得其表面温度高达 46.6 °C。在长时间负载的情况下，智能手机的 SoC 性能会明显降低。

Max. Load
 46.2 °C46.6 °C45.3 °C 
 46.4 °C45.7 °C44.2 °C 
 44.1 °C45.2 °C43.1 °C 
Maximum: 46.6 °C
Average: 45.2 °C
44.5 °C45.9 °C46.5 °C
41.8 °C45.6 °C46.1 °C
42.4 °C43.4 °C43.6 °C
Maximum: 46.5 °C
Average: 44.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +36%
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.9 % +35%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 % +13%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.7 % +7%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73.5 %
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.4 % -30%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +21%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % +21%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +20%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.3 %
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % -19%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -38%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 %
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.2 % -23%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Sony Xperia 10 VI
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 % +12%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.4 %
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.1 % -39%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.2 (15.3-18.6)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.87 (7.57-14.8)
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.2 (14.1-14.2)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
Sony Xperia 10 VI Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.68 (3.67-3.7)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.8 (12-18)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.2 (49.9-68)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø33.9 (26-50.6)
OnePlus Nord 3 Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.2 (42.7-51.5)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Sony Xperia 10 VI Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.1-14.3)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.4 (43.6-55.4)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.5 (60.6-71.8)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø15.3 (14.4-17)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.4 (11-16.9)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.29 (6.99-7.91)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø5.33 (3.92-7.24)
Sony Xperia 10 VI Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø1.487 (1.474-1.495)

发言人

Poco F6 的杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）认证立体声扬声器可产生相对均衡的音效，但几乎听不到低音。

外接音频设备可通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙 5.4 连接到智能手机。Poco F6 只支持 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive 和 LDAC 等相对较少的蓝牙编解码器。而 Poco F6 Pro.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.239.92531.833.63118.236.14023.436.25032.435.86319.434.38018.838.110017.64012513.843.816015.951.12001647.925016.455.131515.156.440013.860.450012.968.163013.872.280013.576.8100013.180.4125013.880.7160012.575.820001378.2250013.279.4315014.581.6400013.48050001478.2630015.279.580001576.41000013.674.7125001772.61600015.565.5SPL2690.5N0.785.5median 13.8median 75.8Delta19.627.333.426.235.525.938.429.240.335.642.325.935.822.14117.840.517.146.518.157.414.255.214.15610.758.61159.312.863.711.164.61271.111.774.71279.312.877.412.479.512.379.713.3821384.213.581.613.278.913.878.213.776.113.469.313.360.624.991.40.685.1median 13.2median 74.719.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco F6Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco F6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 90 瓦快速充电

耗电量

Poco F6 的功耗并不明显。通过随附的电源适配器，5000 毫安时电池的充电功率可达 90 瓦。Poco 表示，如果激活加速充电和提高充电速度等电池功能，一个充电周期大约需要 35 分钟。我们关闭了这两项功能，充电时间为 45 分钟。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.17 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.13 / 1.17 Watt
Load midlight 7.35 / 13.76 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco F6
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh		OnePlus Nord 3
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh		Sony Xperia 10 VI
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
-44%
-7%
30%
-24%
-55%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.92
-15%
1.46
-83%
0.85
-6%
0.62
22%
1.11
-39%
1.353 ?(0.7 - 3.6, n=6)
-69%
0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.13
1.46
-29%
1.84
-63%
1.51
-34%
0.94
17%
1.14
-1%
2.29 ?(1.09 - 6.52, n=6)
-103%
1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years)
-28%
Idle Maximum *
1.17
1.65
-41%
2.14
-83%
1.71
-46%
0.97
17%
1.16
1%
2.42 ?(1.16 - 6.54, n=6)
-107%
1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years)
-37%
Load Average *
7.35
7.96
-8%
8.64
-18%
4.87
34%
3.36
54%
12.33
-68%
8.5 ?(6.5 - 10.6, n=6)
-16%
6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years)
11%
Load Maximum *
13.76
10.74
22%
9.99
27%
11.73
15%
8.54
38%
15.34
-11%
11.1 ?(8.64 - 13.8, n=6)
19%
9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years)
28%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.15 (1.179-13.1)
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.29 (1.092-13.3)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.37 (1.064-10.1)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.978 (0.884-1.471)
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.923 (0.836-1.163)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.8 (9.93-12.6)
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.68 (5.85-9.37)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.21 (4.99-5.9)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.978 (0.884-1.471)
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.923 (0.836-1.163)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

电池寿命

Poco F6 在测试中实现了良好的电池续航能力。在现实的 WLAN 测试中，它的续航时间为 16 小时，因此与对比设备相当。Poco F6 Pro Poco F6 Pro在我们的测试中，电池续航时间为 15:09 小时，与 Poco F6 的电池续航时间不相上下。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 00min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Poco F6
5000 mAh
960 min
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
796 min
OnePlus Nord 3
5000 mAh
815 min
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
1077 min
Sony Xperia 10 VI
5000 mAh
1179 min
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
942 min

Pros

+ 系统性能高
+ 明亮的显示屏
+ 良好的主摄像头
+ 电池寿命长
+ 充电功率 90 瓦

Cons

- 无 eSIM
- 只有 USB 2.0
- 无存储卡插槽

判决

回顾：小米 Poco F6。测试设备由小米德国公司提供。
回顾：小米 Poco F6。测试设备由小米德国公司提供。

Poco F6 以其可靠的功能和相对较低的价格给人留下了深刻印象。搭载了 骁龙 8s 第三代处理器，这款 6.67 英寸设备的运行速度几乎与更昂贵的 Poco F6 Pro.不过，Poco F6 的价格要低得多，因为 450 欧元的建议零售价已经在网上被大幅压低。

Poco F6 以低廉的价格提供了大量的性能，并将这些性能与良好的功能结合在一起。如果你想花很少的钱就能拥有明亮的 120 Hz 显示屏、良好的电池续航能力和快速充电功能，那么 Poco 的这款中端智能手机就是你的不二之选。

Poco F6 除了拥有充足的 SoC 处理能力，可以轻松满足当前所有应用程序和游戏的需求外，还拥有明亮的 AMOLED 面板、出色的主摄像头、90 瓦快速充电和良好的电池续航能力。

塑料外壳让 Poco F6 既漂亮又轻便，但手感并不特别优质。不过，它的做工确实不错，而且达到了 IP64 防护等级，还提供了防水溅功能，而有趣的是，Poco F6 Pro 却不具备这种功能。

Poco 智能手机只有几个小缺点。它不支持 eSIM 卡，由于没有 microSD 卡，内部内存无法扩展，USB-C 端口只能以缓慢的 USB 2.0 速度连接。

Poco F6 的替代产品包括 谷歌 Pixel 8a以及 三星Galaxy A55 5G以及内部设备，如 Poco X6 Pro.

价格和供应情况

Poco F6 售价 450 欧元。如果您选择的是 8/256 GB 的小版本（12/512 GB 售价 500 欧元）。在其他网上商店，你可以以远低于 400 欧元的价格买到这款智能手机，例如在Alternate。

注：我们已经更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性 。 这里.

Xiaomi Poco F6 - 08/21/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
49 / 69 → 71%
Weight
91%
Battery
90%
Display
86%
Games Performance
37 / 55 → 67%
Application Performance
71 / 85 → 84%
AI Performance
53%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
75%
Average
63%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
97.8%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
61.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 37.4%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Poco F6 评测--这款中端智能手机非常适合注重价格的买家
Manuel Masiero, 2024-08-22 (Update: 2024-08-22)