华硕 ProArt PX13 评测--搭载 AMD Zen 5 和 RTX 4070 的全球最快 13.3 英寸二合一笔记本电脑
新款华硕 ProArt PX13 是一款小巧的 13.3 英寸二合一设备,主要面向那些追求最小巧、最强大设备的创意用户。它采用了 AMD 全新的 Zen 5 移动处理器和 Nvidia 专用的GeForce GPU。显示屏采用 2,880 x 1,800 像素的高分辨率 OLED 面板,但频率仅为 60 Hz。
我们的评测设备是高端型号,售价约为 2999 美元,配备了 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370和 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑配备 75 瓦 TGP。此外,还配备了 2 TB 固态硬盘和 32 GB 内存(注:评测样品仅配备了 1 TB 固态硬盘)。与 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑的入门级价格为 1,999 美元(24 GB 内存、1 TB SSD),而配备了 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑(32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD)的价格为 2399 美元。
纵观潜在的竞争对手,我们很快就会发现,在配备专用 GPU 的紧凑型设备方面,华硕目前占据了市场的主导地位。我们还将包括多媒体设备,如 ROG Zephyrus G14以及 雷蛇刀锋 14和 微软 Surface Laptop Studio 2进行比较,尽管这些设备的体积更大。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
88.2 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 18.7 mm | 13.40" | 2560x1600 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 20 mm | 13.40" | 2560x1600 | |
93 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 22 mm | 14.40" | 2400x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
外壳 - 极其稳定的一体式机身
铝制一体成型机身设计让我们想起了华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14,但 PX13 的设计略显俏皮。机盖上可能没有 LED 灯带,但在铰链或屏幕边缘等许多地方都有凹槽图案。此外,2 合 1 底座上还有小橡胶脚垫(前边缘为圆形,铰链前为条状),这意味着你可以把设备放在键盘上而不会滑开。总之,PX13 的设计非常时尚,这意味着您也可以在专业环境中轻松使用它。光滑的黑色表面不易沾染污渍和指纹。与 G14 的另一个不同之处在于风扇格栅,因为整个后部以及设备两侧的后部区域都是用来散热的。
底座的稳定性非常出色,即使施加很大的压力也不会出现松动。此外,我们也无法听到任何嘎吱嘎吱的声音。扭动明显变薄的盖子时,情况会有所不同。 不过,在日常情况下,这应该不会造成任何问题。由于使用的是 OLED 面板,因此无论如何都不会出现图像瑕疵。虽然铰链一般都很牢固,但单手仍可打开盖子,但轻微的晃动还是无法避免的。盖子可以完全折叠打开,这意味着有多种使用方式。 ProArt 的重量接近 1.4 千克,如果纯粹作为平板电脑使用,拿起来会非常重。遗憾的是,无法将附带的华硕笔 2.0 放在外壳的任何位置。
新款 ProArt PX13 的厚度仅为 17.7 毫米,是同类产品中最紧凑、最薄的设备。二合一设备的重量不到 1.4 千克,可以轻松放入任何包中。200 瓦 PSU 的重量为 588 克。
功能 - USB 4.0 和 Wi-Fi 7
由于整个机身后部和两侧的后部区域都用于散热,因此接口位于两侧的中间位置。端口选择本身就非常合理,因为除了 2x USB-C 4.0 外,还有一个普通和一个快速 USB-A。此外,还有 HDMI 和 microSD 读卡器。设备可在两侧充电。
SD 读卡器
与我们的参考卡(Angelibird AV Pro V60)搭配使用时,microSD 读卡器的最高传输速度达到了 255 MB/s,非常出色,而在复制数据时,这一数字则大幅下降到 55 MB/s。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) |
交流
ProArt PX13 配备了联发科 MT9725 Wi-Fi 模块,支持蓝牙 5.4 和 Wi-Fi 7。配合我们的华硕参考路由器,Wi-Fi 性能非常出色,是我们迄今为止记录到的最佳性能。使用外接显示器时,所有视频输出都通过 dGPU 运行。不过,也可以通过 ProArt 软件完全停用 dGPU。
Networking | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
在图像质量方面,200 万像素的网络摄像头并不突出。当然,它支持 Windows-Studio 效果,还提供了通过 Window Hello 进行人脸识别的红外模块。
维护
底盖由 Torx 螺钉(T5)固定,但中间的螺钉隐藏在胶合的橡胶套下。我们不清楚为什么要这样做,因为这样做只会加大拆卸底板的难度。在设备内部,风扇、螺丝固定的电池、Wi-Fi 模块和紧凑型 M.2 2230 固态硬盘都很容易接触到。不过,内存是焊接的。
可持续性
在 ProArt PX13 的产品页面上,没有关于生产过程中二氧化碳排放量或所使用可回收材料比例的详细信息。包装主要采用纸板,但也使用了塑料。华硕本身也没有提供任何维修指南。在同类对比设备中,该产品的功耗相对较低,待机功耗和关机功耗也没有异常。
输入设备 - 键程为 1.7 毫米的出色键盘
华硕为 ProArt PX13 配备了键程为 1.7 毫米的键盘--这在当今的标准中已经是相当大的了。再加上稳定的底座,打字体验非常出色,让目前大多数商务笔记本电脑望尘莫及。针对黑暗环境,还提供了三级白色背光,也可以自动控制。从布局上看,小方向键并不理想,如果能更好地利用空间来设置专用的上下键就更好了。作为 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑,新的 Copilot 按钮当然也包括在内,但其功能与任务栏符号相同。
宽大的点击板(12.7 x 8 厘米)也运行良好,不仅手感顺滑,而且发出的低沉、高质量的点击声也给我们留下了深刻印象。左上方的触摸板集成了所谓的 DialPad。几年来,我们看到华硕使用了不同版本的这种设计。当然,拨号盘能否有效使用,主要取决于用户的个人工作流程。在正常使用过程中,我们对它的升降略感困惑,但指针移动一般都能很好地实现。此外,还可以通过电容式触摸屏进行输入,使用随附的华硕笔 2.0 也很顺利。
显示屏 - 只有一个 60 Hz OLED 触摸屏
现在我们来看看新款 ProArt PX13 最大的争议点--显示屏。华硕为该设备配备了一块 13.3 英寸的三星 OLED 触摸屏,分辨率高达 2,880 x 1,800 像素。在与更大的面板(例如 Zenbook S 16 的 OLED)直接比较时,DPI 数字也会变得很明显,因为所有内容看起来都更清晰。色彩鲜艳,黑度良好,响应时间非常快。但是,就 OLED 显示屏而言,主观画质并不完全符合 2024 年的预期。首先,明亮的区域显得有些颗粒感,而且你会感觉屏幕有些潮湿。不过,这种效果并不像目前采用 OLED 面板的戴尔 XPS 等机型那样明显。此外,在反光的情况下,有一个明显的结构,可能是触摸层产生的。尽管如此,最大的问题还是在于 60 Hz 频率,这也是运动看起来不如 90 或 120 Hz 机型流畅的原因。亮度和色温都可以自动调节。
在 SDR 模式下,亮度平均接近 360 cd/m²,略低于目前的 OLED(400 cd/m² 或更高)。尽管如此,再加上较低的黑阶,对比度仍然非常出色。在 HDR 模式下(仍需在 Windows 中手动激活),显示屏的一小部分亮度最高可达 577 cd/m²,当显示的图像几乎完全为白色时,亮度为 503 cd/m²。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 360 cd/m²
Contrast: 18000:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 ATNA33AA08-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV TL134ADXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4", 165 Hz | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM TL134ADXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4", 165 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 240 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 LQ144P1JX01, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | -2% | 0% | -2% | -19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.4 | 95.1 -4% | 96.94 -2% | 99.6 0% | 96.9 -3% | 66.7 -33% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.7 0% | 99.92 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 99 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 88.9 | 84.4 -5% | 85.17 -4% | 89.9 1% | 85 -4% | 68.9 -22% |
Response Times | -221% | -46% | 142% | -309% | 443% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.94 ? | 4.79 ? -147% | 2.1 ? -8% | 0.62 ? 68% | 6 ? -209% | 77.6 ? -3900% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.63 ? | 6.42 ? -294% | 3 ? -84% | 0.68 ? 58% | 8.3 ? -409% | 34.3 ? -2004% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 960 ? 300% | 17600 ? 7233% | |||
Screen | -334% | -276% | 40% | -257% | -133% | |
Brightness middle | 360 | 473 31% | 464 29% | 423 18% | 484.1 34% | 511 42% |
Brightness | 358 | 445 24% | 455 27% | 424 18% | 466 30% | 503 41% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 89 -9% | 89 -9% | 98 0% | 89 -9% | 89 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.39 -1850% | 0.4 -1900% | 0.01 50% | 0.38 -1800% | 0.26 -1200% |
Contrast | 18000 | 1213 -93% | 1160 -94% | 42300 135% | 1274 -93% | 1965 -89% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 3.3 -200% | 2 -82% | 0.7 36% | 2.23 -103% | 0.5 55% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.3 | 8.93 -288% | 4.2 -83% | 1.8 22% | 4.57 -99% | 1.1 52% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 5.4 -286% | 2.7 -93% | 0.8 43% | 1.6 -14% | 0.8 43% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.11 104% | 2.24 98% | 2.18 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 6554 99% | 7540 86% | 6832 95% | 6505 100% | 6816 95% | 6650 98% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.09 | 1.2 | 0.74 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -186% /
-240% | -108% /
-177% | 61% /
54% | -189% /
-206% | 97% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)对面板进行了测量。标准原生配置文件会使色彩过饱和/偏斜。为了尽可能实现最精确的色彩还原,您只需选择 P3 配置文件,就能使所有偏差(灰度和色彩)达到其目标值。此外,还提供了精确的 sRGB 配置文件,这意味着你可以立即编辑图像。使用我们自己的校准,我们无法进一步提高图像质量,这就是我们不提供可下载配置文件的原因。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.84 ms rise | |
↘ 0.79 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.99 ms rise | |
↘ 0.95 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 50 % | ≤ 53 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 53 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在 100-54 % 的亮度范围内,华硕使用频率为 60 Hz 的直流调光。在亮度为 53% 及以下时,则采用频率为 240 Hz 的经典 PWM 调光。与华硕所有其他 OLED 面板一样,所谓的无闪烁 OLED 调光可通过 MyAsus 软件实现。使用直流调光时,振幅更长、更有限(在顶部切断)。在其下方,你可以看到整个振荡曲线。通过软件调光(选择高亮度并使用软件调光),可以避免进入此范围。
在室外,高反光的触摸屏很成问题,因为你要经常与反光作斗争。在可视角度稳定性方面,没有任何问题。
性能 - 禅宗 5 与阿达-拉芙蕾丝的结合
ProArt PX13 的每个配置都配备了新的 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370。基本型号配备 24 GB 内存(LPDDR5x 7500)和GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑,配备 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑或 4070 笔记本电脑的版本则配备 32 GB 内存。内存不可扩展。
测试条件
华硕提供各种性能配置文件,可通过 MyAsus 软件或 ProArt creator hub 软件进行选择。在下表中,我们列出了不同的配置文件及其相关性能值。
能源模式 | CPU TDP | CBR 23 Multi | GPU TGP | Time Spy 图形 | 压力测试 TDP/TGP | CP 2077 1080p Ultra | 最大风扇容量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whisper | 80/50 瓦 | 20,010 分 | 58 瓦 | 8,856 分 | CPU: 20 瓦 GPU:33 瓦 |
62.7fps | 40.1 dB(A) |
标准 | 80/55 瓦 | 20,247 分 | 65 瓦 | 9,680 分 | CPU: 20 瓦 GPU:55 瓦 |
69.1fps | 47.5 dB(A) |
性能 | 80/65 瓦 | 23,236 分 | 75 瓦 | 10,693 分 | CPU: 25 瓦 GPU:65 瓦 |
74.1fps | 53.3 dB(A) |
按照标准,我们使用 "性能 "模式进行了所有基准测试和测量。在电池模式下,系统会自动切换到标准 模式。此外,还有一种手动模式,可对 CPU 和 GPU 进行各种调节。
处理器 - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
新的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 是 15-54 瓦 TDP 级的三款新 Zen5 移动处理器之一,这意味着根据 TDP 配置的不同,新的 Ryzen AI 300 芯片是之前 U/HS 处理器的继承者。新的 HX 370 提供 12 个 Zen5 内核,最高主频为 5.1 GHz。换句话说,比老款移动处理器多了四个内核。更多技术细节,请参阅我们的详尽分析文章。
在 ProArt PX13 中,处理器的功耗可短暂达到 80 瓦,然后降至 65 瓦。在我们所有的 CPU 基准测试中,新处理器的性能数据都非常出色,平均而言,比 Razer Blade 14 中的老款 Ryzen 9 8945HS 高出 14%--尽管在 90/75 瓦时,处理器的功耗会更高。在持续负载情况下,性能的下降幅度仍然很小,但结果略有波动。不过,这是 Cinebench R15 测试时间相对较短的结果,因为根据运行情况,这只是处理器使用其最大 80 瓦功率的时间长短问题。不过,即使在 "最糟糕 "的情况下,Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 也是速度最快的芯片。在电池模式下,最大功耗被限制在 55 瓦,这导致 Cinebench R23 多核测试中的性能下降了近 10%(20629 分)。尽管如此,这仍然足以让它稳居榜首。总之,这意味着我们所面对的是市场上 CPU 性能最快的 13.3 英寸电脑。其他 CPU 基准测试 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM -2! | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Average of class Multimedia |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23786, n=16) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1953 - 2049, n=9) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6469 - 9246, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (772 - 804, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3498, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (298 - 315, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (140 - 192, n=8) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67615 - 83572, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6063 - 6208, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13648 - 15367, n=9) | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2780 - 2884, n=9) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (12487 - 15012, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1957 - 2108, n=8) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 26.9, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (49.6 - 66.6, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.4041 - 0.4257, n=8) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37654, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (97073 - 147937, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5843, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84460 - 99088, n=8) | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19021, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (51277 - 79251, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (68042 - 81929, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1086 - 1520, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13959 - 20608, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37747 - 50118, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV |
系统性能
ProArt PX13 是一款反应非常灵敏的系统,也为要求苛刻的任务提供了足够的储备。有些用户当然希望能像较大的 ProArt P16 那样升级 64 GB 内存。在测试过程中,我们无法启动 LatencyMon 应用程序,而且在 F1 24 中出现了蓝屏。不过,我们认为这是驱动程序的问题,并已与 AMD 联系。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7696 - 7752, n=3) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9856 - 10144, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9713 - 10027, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12165 - 13205, n=3) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1785 - 1794, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1611 - 1611, n=2) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2212 - 2270, n=2) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1225 - 1274, n=2) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (282 - 298, n=2) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (244 - 247, n=2) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (439 - 460, n=2) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7696 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (88377 - 92030, n=8) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98398 - 100903, n=8) | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98429 - 108954, n=8) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (108.5 - 119.4, n=8) | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
如前所述,我们无法在评测设备上启动 LatencyMon。至少,在播放 4K 视频(YouTube)时没有出现丢帧问题。
大容量存储器
在 PX13 中,华硕使用了紧凑型 M.2 2230 固态硬盘,原则上这不是问题,但这限制了升级硬盘的选择,而且价格也高于普通的 M.2 2280 固态硬盘。评测设备采用的是西部数据 SN740 1 TB 变体,首次安装后,用户可访问 875 GB。与同类产品直接比较,该固态硬盘的性能一般,但在持续加载过程中非常稳定。其他固态硬盘基准测试可在 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
显卡 -GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑
在日常使用中,计算由集成的 Radeon 890M 处理。要求苛刻的任务则由专用的GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑(8 GB VRAM)通过 Optimus 显卡开关提供帮助。这是 75 瓦的变体(65 瓦 TGP + 10 瓦 Dynamic Boost),考虑到紧凑的机身,性能还是不错的。在 13 英寸的竞争对手中,4070 的最大功耗为 65 瓦,而在使用性能配置文件的较大型 Zephyrus G14 中,功耗也达到了 75 瓦。
总体而言,基准测试结果非常好,甚至优于大多数竞争对手。只有采用 90 瓦 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的 Razer Blade 14 快了约 20%。同样令人欣喜的是,图形性能在连续负载情况下仍能保持稳定,而考虑到设备的尺寸,这并不是理所当然的。在电池模式下,图形处理器的功耗被控制在 45 瓦,导致性能下降超过 20%。更多 GPU 基准测试请参见我们的技术部分。
3DMark 11 Performance | 31157 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24888 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10691 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2386 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 10952 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=46, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=64) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 181, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=66) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Multimedia (167 - 946, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 440, n=63) |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
当然,ProArt PX13 可以处理要求苛刻的游戏。新的 Ryzen 处理器在这方面也有不俗的表现,PX13 在大多数游戏中的表现都非常接近 Razer Blade 14。所有现代游戏都能在全高清甚至 QHD 分辨率下轻松运行。不过,在某些游戏中,我们无法选择 QHD 分辨率,但这一点肯定会通过驱动程序更新得到纠正。在较长时间的负载情况下,游戏性能保持完全稳定。其他游戏基准测试 这里.
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=81, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 174.2 | 167.1 | 104.5 | 82.2 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 380 | 201 | 110 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 157.1 | 146.7 | 131.9 | 122.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 173.8 | 140.5 | 104 | 75.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 96.5 | 90.7 | 74.1 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 139 | 123 | 119 | 111 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 357 | 268 | 217 | 191.7 | 121.8 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 127.4 | 109.7 | 72.7 | 66.7 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 115.2 | 101.9 | 86.1 | 74.1 | |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 145 | 130 | 99 | 92 | |
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 80.5 | 79.8 | 62.4 | 54.6 |
排放 - 风扇噪音大,但温度适宜
噪音排放
散热装置由许多热导管和两个风扇组成,可将废热从机箱两侧和后部排出。由于机箱结构紧凑,部件运行速度快,因此散热系统的工作十分繁重,这一点也不奇怪。特别是在性能模式下,风扇甚至在执行日常任务时也会启动。这就是为什么你可以毫不犹豫地使用耳语模式执行简单任务的原因,因为 CPU 的性能在此模式下依然出色。在游戏和压力测试中,CPU 的噪音为 53.3 dB(A),声音也非常大,这就是为什么要使用耳机的原因。不过,使用耳语模式测试性能也是值得的。在下表中,我们汇总了各种配置文件的测试结果。评测设备中没有其他电子噪音。
能源模式 | 3DMark 06 | 赛博朋克 2077 | 压力测试 |
---|---|---|---|
Whisper | 37.7 dB(A) | 40.1 dB(A) | 40.1 dB(A) |
标准 | 43 dB(A) | 47.5 dB(A) | 47.5 dB(A) |
性能 | 43 dB(A) | 53.3 dB(A) | 53.3 dB(A) |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.7 / 28.4 / 30.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43 / 53.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 | Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | 3% | 9% | 10% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 24.7 | 21.42 13% | 24 3% | 23.9 3% | 24.3 2% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 29.07 -18% | 24 3% | 23.9 3% | 25 -1% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Average * | 28.4 | 29.07 -2% | 24 15% | 23.9 16% | 25 12% | 24.4 14% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.9 | 29.07 6% | 36.5 -18% | 23.9 23% | 25 19% | 26.9 13% |
Load Average * | 43 | 44.54 -4% | 41.3 4% | 46.2 -7% | 33 23% | 48.5 -13% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 53.3 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 53.3 | 47.08 12% | 46.9 12% | 46.2 13% | 51.9 3% | 51.8 3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.1 | 44.7 | 46.2 | 49.5 | 51.8 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
风扇的声音可能会比较大,但表面温度仍然可以接受,即使在压力测试中也是如此。在设备底部的一个位置(后部中间),我们测得的温度超过 47 °C,但两侧的温度仍然较低,这意味着你甚至可以把设备放在膝盖上。总之,上侧的温度要低得多,尤其是风扇上方的区域。在红外图像中,你还可以清楚地看到 WASD 区域在游戏时非常凉爽。在执行日常任务时,机箱也几乎不会发热。
在综合 CPU 负载的压力测试中,处理器的运行功率短暂达到 40 瓦,然后稳定在 25 瓦。显卡最初以 60 瓦运行,然后在压力测试的其余时间里以 65 瓦运行。总之,对于一款 13.3 英寸二合一电脑来说,这些数据非常不错。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.9 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.4 °C / -8 F).
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -6% | 10% | 3% | -7% | 10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.3 | 45.6 -1% | 42.5 6% | 46.6 -3% | 41.8 8% | 40.4 11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.9 | 44.2 8% | 42.6 11% | 47.8 -0% | 42.2 12% | 42.2 12% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.5 | 33.8 -19% | 26.2 8% | 26.7 6% | 34.8 -22% | 26.6 7% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.9 | 32.8 -10% | 26 13% | 27.8 7% | 37.4 -25% | 27 10% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
PX13 的音响系统使用了两个模块,音质不错,优于 13 英寸的直接竞争对手。不过,Zephyrus G14 上的出色音响系统仍遥遥领先。
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 平均电池寿命
耗电量
我们对耗电量的测量没有发现任何意外,在空闲运行时,全亮度下的耗电量不到 10 瓦,这款小巧的二合一设备相当经济。游戏时的功耗为 120 瓦,而在压力测试中,我们记录的最大功耗为 185 瓦,几秒钟后稳定在 137 瓦,然后在接下来的 90 秒内降至 124 瓦。这说明所提供的 200 瓦 PSU 非常适合。
Off / Standby | 0.12 / 0.87 Watt |
Idle | 7.5 / 9.3 / 9.6 Watt |
Load |
74.1 / 185 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4" | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -84% | -17% | 7% | -122% | 27% | -71% | -1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.5 | 16.63 -122% | 8.9 -19% | 6.9 8% | 20.9 -179% | 3 60% | 12.4 ? -65% | 6.54 ? 13% |
Idle Average * | 9.3 | 20.68 -122% | 12.6 -35% | 8.6 8% | 25.6 -175% | 7.1 24% | 17.5 ? -88% | 11.3 ? -22% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.6 | 29.88 -211% | 13 -35% | 9 6% | 32.1 -234% | 7.6 21% | 24.2 ? -152% | 13.3 ? -39% |
Load Average * | 74.1 | 75.5 -2% | 92.5 -25% | 75.2 -1% | 72.7 2% | 73.1 1% | 97.6 ? -32% | 70.7 ? 5% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 121.6 | |||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 121.5 | |||||||
Load Maximum * | 185 | 113.3 39% | 133.6 28% | 161.6 13% | 228.4 -23% | 128.5 31% | 222 ? -20% | 116.1 ? 37% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 92.6 | 104.4 | 109.7 | 182.1 | 113.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
总的来说,73 Wh 电池的续航时间还算不错,只有少数直接竞争对手能提供更好的续航时间。在 150 cd/m²(相当于评测设备最大 SDR 亮度的 69%)的 Wi-Fi 测试中,我们记录了 8.5 个小时,在全亮度条件下记录了近 7 个小时。在 150 cd/m² 的条件下,视频播放可持续 10 个多小时。
电池还可通过 200 瓦 PSU 快速充电。在设备开启的情况下,一个完整的充电周期大约需要 100 分钟,24 分钟后可充满 50%的电量,49 分钟后可充满 80%的电量。
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 56 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 58 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 26% | -32% | 7% | -6% | 33% | 35% | |
H.264 | 616 | 685 11% | 312 -49% | 725 18% | 675 10% | 847 ? 38% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 510 | 712 40% | 398 -22% | 555 9% | 428 -16% | 498 -2% | 640 ? 25% |
Load | 69 | 52 -25% | 64 -7% | 72 4% | 132 91% | 97.1 ? 41% | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 90 | 76.3 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - ProArt PX13 是世界上速度最快的 13 英寸设备,尽管其 60 Hz OLED 屏幕并不完美
如果您想在最小巧的外形中获得最高性能,那么新款华硕 ProArt PX13 2 合 1 就是目前世界上速度最快的 13 英寸设备。全新的 AMD Ryzen 处理器也功不可没,其 Zen 5 内核与旧机型相比优势明显。在游戏方面,如果与GeForce 4070 笔记本电脑结合使用,它的表现也非常出色。此外,这两个组件的性能也相当稳定,总而言之,散热效果很好--尽管在性能模式下风扇的声音会非常大。尽管如此,表面温度仍保持在可接受的范围内。
这款机箱非常出色,具有极其稳定的底座和优质的制造质量。PX13 配备了足够多的可用端口,可能是目前移动领域中最好的键盘(与 Zephyrus G14 一起)。触摸板中的 DialPad 可以派上用场,不过这取决于用户使用 Adobe 应用程序等程序的个人工作流程。此外,还有一个速度极快的 Wi-Fi-7 模块和所有 Copilot+ AI 功能,如实时字幕。
得益于全新的 AMD Zen 5 处理器和GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑,新 ProArt 是目前能买到的最快的 13.3 英寸设备。除此之外,还有出色的键盘和充足的端口。不过,我们不明白为什么华硕会在如此高昂的价格下选择 60 Hz OLED 显示屏。
从原理上讲,OLED 显示屏的高分辨率和准确的色彩还原带来了非常好的图像质量,但明亮区域会出现轻微的颗粒感。60 Hz 频率值得商榷,与 120 Hz 面板相比有明显差异。考虑到高昂的售价,这个决定很难让人接受。不过,这不仅与 PX13 有关,因为更大的 ProArt P16 也配备了 60 Hz OLED。
最大的竞争对手来自华硕本身,但说到其他竞争对手,你必须看看 14 英寸的细分市场,才能找到性能相当的产品。因此,新款 ProArt PX13 在性能上可谓独树一帜。
价格和供应情况
新款 ProArt PX13 现在可以直接从华硕网站订购,起价为 1,999 美元。.我们的评测配置为 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑,售价为 2999 美元。
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306
- 07/27/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.