Razer Blade 14 2024 笔记本电脑评测：搭载 Ryzen AI，面向未来
由于 2023 款 Blade 14 已经是 2022 款的重大更新，最新的 2024 款相对于 2023 款只是小幅更新。最新版本将 2023 型号上的 "凤凰 "Ryzen 9 7940HS CPU 替换为 "鹰点 "Ryzen 9 8945HS。除此之外，2024 机型的其他方面几乎都与 2023 机型相同，因此我们建议您查看上关于 2023 机型的评测 ，以了解有关 Blade 14 物理特性的更多信息。
我们的测试机是最高端的配置，配备了上述 Zen 4 CPU、32 GB 可移动 DDR5-5600 内存、140 WGeForce RTX 4070 GPU 和 1600p 240 Hz IPS 显示屏，售价约为 2700 美元。较少的 SKU 则配备 RTX 4060，但所有 2024 配置都配备相同的 Ryzen 9 CPU 和显示屏。只有配备 RTX 4070 图形处理器的 "水银 "色选项才可用。
刀锋 14 的替代品包括其他 14 英寸游戏笔记本电脑，如联想Legion Slim 5 14 ，宏碁掠夺者 Triton 14 ，戴尔 Alienware x14 ，或流行的华硕 Zephyrus G14 。
更多 Razer 评论：
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.7 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 92.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 20.79 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1600 | |
| 87.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 19.81 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 20.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
交流
为了兼容 Wi-Fi 7，无线模块已从高通 WCN685x 升级到高通 FastConnect 7800。由于 Wi-Fi 7 路由器尚未普及，绝大多数用户不会受益于该芯片的新功能。因此，加入该芯片更多的是为了在用户决定将家庭网络升级到 Wi-Fi 7 时为未来做好准备。
与华硕 AXE11000 Wi-Fi 6E 测试路由器配对时，我们没有遇到任何连接问题或不稳定问题。
网络摄像头
维护
2024 和 2023 型号之间没有重大的内部差异。
显示屏 - 用于游戏和内容创建的 IPS
有趣的是，今年的 Blade 14 型号的面板与去年的型号（TL140ADXP04-0 与 B140QAN06.U）不同。用我们的色度计测量，新面板的亮度稍暗一些，但包括快速响应时间、DCI-P3 全彩、240 Hz 刷新率和 ~1300:1 对比度在内的其他性能基本保持不变，可提供与去年类似的观看体验。
需要注意的是，和去年的机型一样，它支持 FreeSync Premium，但不支持 G-Sync。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 484.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 1274:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.74
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B140QAN06.U, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 Samsung SDC ATNA45AF02-2, OLED, 2880x1600, 14.5" | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 BOE NE140QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY B140QAN06.S, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14" | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Samsung SDC4192 (ATNA40YK14-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 2% | 6% | 0% | 4% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 96.9 | 97.3 0% | 99.2 2% | 99.9 3% | 96.9 0% | 99.6 3% | 99.8 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85 | 85.3 0% | 96.5 14% | 85.5 1% | 93.4 10% | 88.7 4% | |
| Response Times | -47% | -1048% | 88% | -61% | -103% | 66% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6 ? | 11.9 ? -98% | 80.8 ? -1247% | 0.79 ? 87% | 15.1 ? -152% | 17.2 ? -187% | 2.4 ? 60% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.3 ? | 8 ? 4% | 78.8 ? -849% | 1.01 ? 88% | 5.8 ? 30% | 9.9 ? -19% | 2.4 ? 71% |
| PWM Frequency | 14878 ? | 240.5 ? | 5430 | 300 | |||
| Screen | -51% | 18% | -22% | -45% | 19% | 50% | |
| Brightness middle | 484.1 | 559.3 16% | 610 26% | 377.5 -22% | 547 13% | 535 11% | 423 -13% |
| Brightness | 466 | 560 20% | 600 29% | 381 -18% | 516 11% | 563 21% | 427 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 96 8% | 97 9% | 88 -1% | 91 2% | 98 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.44 -16% | 0.56 -47% | 0.1 74% | |||
| Contrast | 1274 | 1271 0% | 977 -23% | 4230 232% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.23 | 4.44 -99% | 1.7 24% | 4.19 -88% | 3.28 -47% | 1 55% | 0.55 75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.57 | 9.3 -104% | 2.3 50% | 7.02 -54% | 8.57 -88% | 2.8 39% | 1.15 75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.74 | 0.39 47% | 0.81 -9% | 1.09 -47% | 1.15 -55% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 6.8 -325% | 2.1 -31% | 1.2 25% | 4.4 -175% | 1.8 -13% | 0.69 57% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.168 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.42 91% |
| CCT | 6816 95% | 6242 104% | 6874 95% | 6296 103% | 7767 84% | 6337 103% | 6479 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -33% /
-40% | -343% /
-221% | 24% /
3% | -35% /
-38% | -27% /
-7% | 39% /
42% |
* ... smaller is better
所有设备都经过预校准，以更好地利用面板的广泛色彩覆盖范围。如下文的 CalMAN 结果所示，我们的特定设备在 P3 标准下的平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别仅为 1.6 和 2.23。因此，对于大多数用户来说，不需要进行最终用户校准。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们通过预装的 Synapse 软件将系统设置为 Turbo 模式和 dGPU 模式。如果设置为平衡模式，性能会降低，详见 GPU 性能部分。
Synapse 今年新增了 MUX 切换功能，而 2023 型号上的旧版本没有这个选项。电源配置文件也进行了精简，新增加了 "Turbo "选项，而不是 CPU 和 GPU 的单独设置。
伪装的 Ryzen 9 7940HS 处理器
... Ryzen 9 8945HS是重新命名的 Ryzen 9 7940HS的核心。这两款处理器的目标时钟频率相似，缓存大小和核心数量相同，都是在相同的 Zen 4 平台下制造的。因此，这两款处理器在 CPU 密集型基准测试中取得几乎完全相同的成绩也就不足为奇了。对于视频编码、文件压缩或游戏等传统任务而言，2024 Blade 14 与 2023 型号相比最多只能算是略胜一筹。
Ryzen 9 8945HS 和 7940HS 的主要区别在于，新处理器集成的 NPU 速度更快，可以启用 Windows Studio 特效，如网络摄像头自动取景、眼神矫正和背景模糊等。不过，基于英特尔处理器的笔记本电脑至少在一年前就具备了这些功能，因此它们并不新鲜。自动取景功能与 Razer 的低分辨率 200 万像素网络摄像头也不匹配；惠普提供了相同的功能，但配备了分辨率更高的 500 万像素网络摄像头，可实现更清晰的平移和缩放。
除了 Windows Studio Effects 之外，Ryzen 9 8945HS 中集成的 NPU 还可以在本地运行 Microsoft Co-Pilot，而不是依赖云和互联网连接。通过这种方式，几乎可以瞬间生成结果，而旧处理器则需要数秒。遗憾的是，截至目前，Co-Pilot 完全基于云，没有本地或离线运行的选项，这意味着你甚至无法使用新的 NPU 来完成其设计目的。当然，未来人工智能应用成熟后，这种情况有望改变，但截至 2024 年初，NPU 的功能还非常有限。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (26817 - 28836, n=4) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (113231 - 122633, n=4) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (4839 - 5077, n=4) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (119279 - 125044, n=4) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (15026 - 15661, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (60420 - 65746, n=4) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (86495 - 169431, n=4) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (1029 - 1135, n=4) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (14216 - 15588, n=4) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (33371 - 40815, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
压力测试
仔细观察系统的实时性能，我们就会明白为什么 2024 机型的 GPU 性能始终优于 2023 机型，尽管两者都使用了相同的 RTX 4070 显卡。当在 Turbo 模式下运行游戏时，较新的 Blade 14 的 GPU 将稳定在 114 W 的较高 TGP 上，而去年的型号仅为 87 W。因此，更新机型的 GPU 时钟率（2550 MHz 对 2310 MHz）和核心温度（76 C 对 67 C）都更高。降到平衡模式后，TGP 和 GPU 时钟率将分别略微降低到 103 W 和 2475 MHz，但温度和风扇噪音也随之降低，从而带来更安静的游戏体验。
需要注意的是，虽然 Razer 宣传的最大 TGP 为 140 W，但这一目标在大多数情况下是不可持续的。相反，2024 Blade 14 在游戏时 GPU 的恒定功率为 114 W，这是更准确的预期。
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时，Ryzen 9 8945HS CPU 的核心时钟频率、温度和封装功耗几乎与去年机型的 Ryzen 9 7940HS 相同。这一结果补充了我们在 CineBench 上的观察结果，在 CineBench 上，两款处理器的性能数据几乎完全相同。Turbo Core 时钟频率、温度和功耗分别在 4.7 GHz、97 C 和 90 W 时达到峰值，仅在压力测试的最初几秒钟才会下降并稳定在稍低的值，如下表所示。
系统性能
PCMark 结果与 2023 机型的差距仅为个位数百分点，这表明浏览和轻度编辑等日常任务在最新机型上并没有明显加快。不过，内存性能始终比以前更快，这有助于提升游戏性能，哪怕只是微弱的提升。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7436 - 8312, n=3) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9672 - 11290, n=3) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9502 - 10332, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (11907 - 13363, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1767 - 1830, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1686 - 1783, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1935 - 1960, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1489 - 1672, n=2) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (268 - 324, n=3) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (226 - 269, n=3) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (488 - 586, n=4) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8312 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (62371 - 68976, n=4) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (49966 - 61710, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (78351 - 93153, n=4) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (91.2 - 110.4, n=4) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
虽然 LatencyMon 的结果与去年的机型相当，但 4k60 视频回放的情况更糟。在 60 秒的时间范围内，我们能记录到 6 个丢帧，而 2023 型号则为 0。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
该系统配备的三星 PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘与去年的 Blade 14 相同，没有重大变化。不过，如果能支持 PCIe5 x4 固态硬盘就更好了。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
尽管运行的是与 2023 型号相同的 140 W 移动GeForce RTX 4070 GPU，3DMark 图形分数却提高了近 10%。其成绩甚至一直高于配备相同 RTX 4070 GPU 的微星 Raider GE68 HX。请注意，系统必须在 "性能 "模式下才能获得比预期更好的成绩。否则，根据我们的Fire Strike 结果表，在平衡模式下运行会导致整体性能下降多达 11%。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 33451 | 29228 | 14940 |
| 均衡模式 | 32305 (-4%) | 28019 (-4%) | 13356 (-11%) |
| 电池电量 | 21602 (-35%) | 24961 (-15%) | 8881 (-41%) |
Blade 14 选择 RTX 4060 配置预计会影响 GPU 性能约 10%至 20%。遗憾的是，Razer 没有提供 RTX 4070 以外的图形选项，而竞争对手华硕 Zephyrus G14 则可以升级到 RTX 4090，以获得更高的性能和两倍的 VRAM。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG, i7-13700HX -1! | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF -1! | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 -2! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 -2! | |
| Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
| HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU -2! | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 35995 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 29200 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12924 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
与 2023 机型相比，绝大多数测试游戏在 2024 Blade 14 上的运行速度都略快于上述 3DMark 分数。像《最终幻想 15》或《赛博朋克 2077》这样对 GPU 要求较高的游戏运行速度往往会稍快一些，而像《DOTA 2 重生》或《GTA V》这样对 GPU 要求较低的老游戏则没有任何改进。
4K 游戏是有可能实现的，尽管只有采用 DLSS 和帧生成技术来提高帧率的游戏才能令人满意。以《赛博朋克 2077》为例，在最大原生 4K 设置下，平均帧数仅为 5.8 FPS，而如果同时启用 DLSS Auto 和帧生成功能，则平均帧数为 41 FPS。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 183.1 | 179 | 169 | 109.9 | 92.3 | 90.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 313.8 | 277.3 | 228.7 | 116.8 | 69.4 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 165.3 | 149.8 | 145.3 | 136.1 | 119.6 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 212 | 166.2 | 121.5 | 89 | 48.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 109.9 | 101.9 | 76.8 | 65.2 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 138 | 133 | 123 | 114 | 61 | |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 239.8 | 201.5 | 137.8 | 107.7 | 73.7 | 35.2 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 247 | 240 | 217 | 84.2 | 55.1 | 26.3 |
| Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 99.8 | 91.7 | 86.5 | 80.1 | 51.1 | 24.2 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 235 | 240 | 206 | 77 | 49 | 23 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 162.1 | 136.5 | 89.2 | 71.3 | 54.4 | 34.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 142.5 | 118.9 | 100.2 | 88.6 | 52.1 | 22.5 |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 180 | 158 | 124 | 114 | 82 | 50 |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 101 | 94 | 82 | 62 | 41 | 20 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音的表现与我们在 2023 机型上观察到的大致相同，但由于上述功率曲线的变化而略有不同。例如，在平衡模式下运行时 Witcher 3例如，在平衡模式下运行时，风扇噪音会稳定在 43.2 dB(A)。但是，如果使用 Turbo 模式，风扇噪音会明显增大，在 46 至 50 dB(A) 之间。在平衡模式下进行游戏时，性能差距相对较小，只有几个百分点，因此如果风扇噪音是个问题，用户可以考虑使用该模式，而不是 Turbo 模式。
50 dB(A) 的低噪音范围使 Blade 14 与竞争对手 Zephyrus G14和其他大型游戏笔记本电脑的 "高性能 "模式。如果声音太大，我们建议使用平衡模式玩游戏，然后在支持的情况下启用 DLSS，这样既能提高性能，又能降低风扇噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 25 / 25 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 33 / 51.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) | ||
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 7% | -7% | -7% | -10% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 24.3 | 22.7 7% | 24.8 -2% | 22.8 6% | 25 -3% | 23.3 4% | 24 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 23.4 6% | 24.8 1% | 22.8 9% | 27 -8% | 23.6 6% | 24 4% |
| Idle Average * | 25 | 23.4 6% | 24.8 1% | 27.3 -9% | 29 -16% | 23.6 6% | 24 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25 | 23.4 6% | 24.8 1% | 30.7 -23% | 31 -24% | 33 -32% | 35.71 -43% |
| Load Average * | 33 | 33 -0% | 25.8 22% | 41.6 -26% | 42 -27% | 49.5 -50% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 51.8 -5% | 43.4 12% | 52.8 -7% | 43 13% | 52.2 -5% | 40.22 19% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.9 | 55.6 -7% | 43.4 16% | 52.6 -1% | 45 13% | 52.2 -1% | 51.93 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于风扇在没有高负荷运行时往往比较慵懒，因此即使在桌面上空转，表面温度也相当高。因此，在浏览网页或播放视频时，系统的平均温度比其他超极本要高，但更安静的风扇是一个很好的权衡。
请记住，如前所述，Razer 的交流适配器会比市场上大多数其他交流适配器温度更高。为了安全起见，您需要提防接触到任何敏感材料或电线。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 9% | 15% | 6% | -9% | 7% | 8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.8 | 37.4 11% | 45.9 -10% | 40.4 3% | 54 -29% | 47 -12% | 42 -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 42.2 | 35.2 17% | 42.1 -0% | 49.4 -17% | 56 -33% | 46.5 -10% | 52 -23% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34.8 | 33.2 5% | 23.4 33% | 28.2 19% | 31 11% | 25.9 26% | 26 25% |
| Idle Bottom * | 37.4 | 36.2 3% | 23.8 36% | 29.8 20% | 31 17% | 28 25% | 27 28% |
* ... smaller is better
| CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 46 | 45 |
| Prime95 压力 | 4.4 | -- | 87 | 49 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 4.1 | 1980 | 90 | 75 |
| Witcher 3 压力（涡轮增压模式） | ~1.1 | 2550 | 81 | 76 |
| Witcher 3 压力（平衡模式） | ~0.8 | 2475 | 59 | 69 |
发言人
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
可以说，GPU 性能的逐年提升并不是 "免费 "的，因为 2024 款 Blade 14 在游戏时的耗电量要比 2023 款稍高一些。例如，运行Witcher 3 时，功耗会比以前高出 9% 至 10%，这也许并非巧合，而是与 2024 机型 GPU 性能提升 9% 至 10% 相吻合。
根据亮度和 MUX 设置的不同，在台式机上空转耗电在 20 W 到 32 W 之间。从最低亮度跳到最高亮度将多耗电约 5 瓦，而启用 dGPU 模式将多耗电 7 瓦。
| Off / Standby | 0.61 / 1.5 Watt |
| Idle | 20.9 / 25.6 / 32.1 Watt |
| Load |
72.7 / 228.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, OLED, 2880x1600, 14.5" | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14" | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | 45% | 36% | 22% | 26% | 51% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 20.9 | 19.5 7% | 2.6 88% | 7.3 65% | 12 43% | 9.4 55% | 7.4 65% |
| Idle Average * | 25.6 | 24.7 4% | 11.8 54% | 9.6 62% | 14 45% | 14.2 45% | 8.3 68% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.1 | 27 16% | 12.2 62% | 17.3 46% | 26 19% | 14.5 55% | 8.7 73% |
| Load Average * | 72.7 | 83.2 -14% | 99.9 -37% | 76.6 -5% | 88 -21% | 79 -9% | 76 -5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 182.1 | 165.8 9% | 92.5 49% | 152 17% | 114.9 37% | 172 6% | 70 62% |
| Load Maximum * | 228.4 | 204.5 10% | 101.7 55% | 160.9 30% | 213 7% | 220.8 3% | 132 42% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池续航时间略高于 7 小时，比去年的型号延长了近一个小时。请记住，当使用电池时，Synapse 会自动将刷新率从 240 Hz 改为 60 Hz，以延长运行时间。否则，我们 2024 型号的电池续航时间将更接近 2023 型号的结果。
使用专有交流适配器从空载充电到满载需要 90 到 120 分钟。支持通过第三方 USB-C 适配器充电，但和去年的机型一样，最高只能充电 140 W，尽管 配备 240 瓦 USB-C 充电器的笔记本电脑市场上已经有配备 240 W USB-C 充电器的笔记本电脑。令人遗憾的是，既然有通用的 240 W USB-C 接口可供选择，Blade 14 却仍然依赖于专有的 240 W 充电接口。
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, 72.6 Wh | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73.6 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76.3 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -8% | 57% | 16% | 20% | -7% | 25% | |
| Reader / Idle | 480 | 513 7% | 629 31% | 669 39% | 678 41% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 428 | 374 -13% | 911 113% | 448 5% | 302 -29% | 448 5% | 457 7% |
| Load | 72 | 59 -18% | 73 1% | 80 11% | 109 51% | 58 -19% | 92 28% |
| H.264 | 1077 | 539 | 431 |
Pros
Cons
结论--Ryzen 人工智能尚未解锁
到 2024 年初，从 Ryzen 9 7840HS 跳转到 8945HS就像从 Wi-Fi 6E 跳转到 Wi-Fi 7 一样微不足道。目前，大多数应用还没有完全利用 Ryzen AI 来使新处理器物有所值，就像大多数用户还没有 Wi-Fi 7 路由器来充分发挥 Wi-Fi 7 的优势一样。因此，对于绝大多数用户来说，购买 2024 Blade 14 更多是为了在日后 "解锁 "系统的 AI 和 Wi-Fi 7 功能。
2023 和 2024 机型之间更重要的区别在于新机型的 GPU 速度更快。2024 Blade 14 能以稍快的时钟频率运行相同的GeForce RTX 4070，性能提高 5%至 10%。因此，核心温度和功耗略高，但对于希望最大限度提高单位体积性能的性能猎人来说，这只是一个很小的代价。
如果你对 CPU AI 或 Wi-Fi 7 没有兴趣，那么 2024 Blade 14 的 GPU 性能小幅提升可能会赢得你的青睐。如果没有兴趣，那么外观相同的 2023 型号也能以更低的价格提供基本相同的性能。
虽然今年微不足道的升级是可以理解的，但我们希望在未来看到更多重大变化，比如改用通用的 240 W USB-C 充电、Windows VRR 以及支持 RTX 4080 或 4090 选项。竞品华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 仍然是仅有的能够超越 Blade 14 的 14 英寸游戏笔记本电脑之一，因此很遗憾看到新款雷蛇再次以 RTX 4070 封顶。
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508
- 02/13/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
