Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy S23+智能手机评论 - 更好的Galaxy S23

大的附加值。

除了6.6英寸的外形因素外,三星S23+旗舰智能手机几乎在每个细节上都与它6.1英寸的小兄弟姐妹相似。当涉及到电池寿命时,加号版本走得更远,这样做,是目前最持久的Android 智能手机之一。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen Galaxy S
三星Galaxy S23+

今年,三星再次扩大其Galaxy S系列旗舰智能手机。排在首位的是6.8英寸的Galaxy S23 Ultra.由于集成了S笔手写笔,它成功地弥补了Galaxy S和已停产的Galaxy Note系列之间的差距。如果你追求的是更小的尺寸,6.1英寸的Galaxy S23就在手边,提供相同的 骁龙8代的Galaxy在Galaxy S23系列的所有代表产品中发现,从而使其成为目前最快的智能手机SoC之一。

6.6英寸的三星Galaxy S23+是该组中的第三款,位于入门级和顶级机型之间。然而,就功能而言,这款评测竞争者要比Galaxy S23更接近Galaxy S23 Ultra。

对于其新的Galaxy S智能手机,三星正在要求典型的雄心勃勃的旗舰价格。配有128GB内存的Galaxy S23起价为799美元。Galaxy S23+正式起价为1049美元,至少配备256GB内存。Galaxy S23 Ultra也是如此,三星的要价是1199美元起。

Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Galaxy S Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.60 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 390 PPI, capacitive, Dynamic AMOLED 2x, Adaptive Refresh Rate 48 - 120 Hz, Corning Gorilla Glas Victus 2, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 213.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Compass, Barometer, Fingerprint Reader, UWB, Wi-Fi Direct
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/38/39/40/41/66), 5G Sub6 (1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/25/28/38/40/41/66/77/78), Head SAR 0.77 W/kg, Body SAR 1.45 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 157.8 x 76.2
Battery
4700 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 85°, 23 mm, OIS, Dual Pixel AF) + 12 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 120°, 13 mm, PDAF) + 10 MPix (3x opt. Zoom, 36°, 69 mm, f/2.4, OIS, DPAF)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, 80°, 25 mm, HDR10+)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, One UI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, IP68, Dolby Atmos, Wireless PowerShare, DeX, fanless, waterproof
Weight
195 g
Price
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
90.3 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23+
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
195 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.60"2340x1080
90.3 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core
206 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2556x1179
89.1 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7
212 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3120x1440
88.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080
89.1 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Vivo X90 Pro
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11
214.9 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2800x1260
89.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Xiaomi 13 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
229 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440

机箱 - 由玻璃和铝制成的优雅的机箱

三星为Galaxy S23+提供了与Galaxy S23相同的6种哑光颜色变化。这包括四种标准颜色:薰衣草色奶油色幻影黑绿色。此外,还有两种独家颜色可通过三星的在线商店购买,即石灰色石墨色

就像 Galaxy S22+Galaxy s23+有一个无框架的、从边缘到边缘的、带有圆角的平面设计,并因其出色的制造质量和坚固性而获得评分。IP68认证依然存在,证明该智能手机在1.5米的清水中浸泡30分钟后仍能保持不受损害。Galaxy S23+的厚度保持不变,为7.6毫米,只比前代产品长和宽一些,拿在手里仍然感觉很平衡。

与Galaxy S22机型相比,最大的设计变化可以在该设备的背面找到。后盖现在与位于左上方的三摄系统齐平。然而,由于其镜头仍然突出于机身约2毫米,Galaxy S23+在桌子上非常轻微地来回晃动,除非它被放在一个保护套中。

与它的前辈类似,Galaxy S23+机箱的框架由铠甲铝组成。与设备的正面类似,后盖也得到了升级,现在由大猩猩玻璃Victus 2保护。这给智能手机带来了一种非常高级的感觉。一个很好的副作用。由于采用了磨砂玻璃表面,后盖相对来说可以防指纹。三星还提高了其可持续发展标准。据制造商称,Galaxy S23+的外壳由大约22%的回收材料组成。

三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+

尺寸比较

164.1 mm 74.5 mm 9.3 mm 214.9 g162.9 mm 76.6 mm 8.9 mm 212 g162.9 mm 74.6 mm 8.38 mm 229 g157.8 mm 76.2 mm 7.6 mm 195 g157.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.6 mm 196 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 7.85 mm 206 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

特点 - 8GB LPDDR5X内存和至少256GB UFS 4.0存储空间

三星提供Galaxy S23+的两种内存版本。配备8GB LPDDR5X内存和256GB UFS 4.0大容量存储,该设备的官方价格为1049美元,制造商对配备8/512GB的版本收取1199美元。这款智能手机没有配备microSD插槽。

在端口选择方面,Galaxy S23+与它的前辈基本相似。再一次,USB-C端口以USB 3.2 Gen.1的速度运行,在适配器的帮助下,可以作为音频端口使用。它还支持USB OTB,从而帮助周边设备的连接。我们的测试证实,数据传输速度为287MByte/s。除此之外,DRM Widevine L1也在其上。

Galaxy S23+还采用了典型的三星功能,如DeX桌面模式和使用电源键(标准设置)激活三星自己的Bixby语音助手的选项。任何希望关闭智能手机的人都可以通过快速设置来实现。

除了内存变体、电池容量和更高的性能之外,Galaxy S23+与Galaxy S23几乎完全相同。就像 Galaxy S23 UltraGalaxy S23+有一个额外的功能,即超宽带芯片(UWB),可用于智能标签和数字钥匙等。

左边:没有端口
左边:没有端口
右边:音量摇杆,功能键
右边:音量摇杆,功能键
顶部: 麦克风
顶部: 麦克风
底部:扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 Gen.1、双卡。
底部:扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 Gen.1、双卡。

软件 -Android 13和4年的操作系统升级

开箱后,Galaxy S23+配备了Android 13和三星内部的One UI层。这个版本(5.1)带有许多新功能。三星已经汇编了一份完整的清单,可以在这里找到https://www.samsung.com/us/apps/one-ui/features/.

Galaxy S23+的一个强有力的卖点是长期的软件支持,三星保证从全球市场推出日期(2023年2月)开始,Android 操作系统升级4年,安全更新5年。

根据官方支持网站,Galaxy S23+每月直接从三星接收Android 安全补丁。就在2月中旬的发布会上,这款智能手机及时收到了一个更新,将安全补丁级别更新到了2023年2月1日。

除了标准的谷歌应用和一些三星应用,如SmartThings、Galaxy Wearable、Samsung Pay和Galaxy Store,还有一小部分预装的微软应用,以及Facebook和Spotify。除了OneDrive之外,任何超出要求的第三方工具都可以被卸载。OneDrive只能被停用。

三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+

通信和GNSS--超速的WiFi 6E

Galaxy S23+支持目前所有的移动通信标准,包括5G Sub6,只有5G mmWave缺席。这款智能手机拥有22个4G频段和16个5G频段,覆盖了广泛的频率范围,因此应该能在任何地方收到信号。同样,NFC和蓝牙5.3等通信功能也是该套餐的一部分。

Galaxy S23+有WiFi 6E,与我们的参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000配对,提供非常好和稳定的传输速率,就竞争而言,只有华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000可以挑战。 小米13 Pro.当涉及到5GHz的WiFi时,三星Galaxy 智能手机在竞争中遥遥领先,甚至能让它的前辈站起来。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1491) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1810 (min: 1724) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1804 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1403) MBit/s ∼85%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
822 (min: 409) MBit/s ∼45%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
904 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
945 (min: 917) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1645 (min: 1586) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1743 (min: 1585) MBit/s ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
826 (min: 765) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
899 (min: 432) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1346 (min: 696) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1565 (min: 777) MBit/s ∼86%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1787 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
227 (min: 115) MBit/s ∼13%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
229 (min: 219) MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1814 (min: 1250) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
809 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
993 (min: 972) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1859 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1637 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼75%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1774 (902-1862)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1323 (696-1430)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1533 (1403-1594)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1538 (777-1666)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1623 (1491-1679)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø825 (765-881)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1810 (1724-1871)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø885 (432-966)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

Galaxy S23+使用卫星导航服务GPS(L1,L5)、Glonass(L1)、Galileo(E1,E5a)和Beidou(B1,B1C,B2a)来确定其位置。在测试中,该智能手机在室内和室外都能实现非常快速和准确(3米以内)的卫星定位。

在移动中,这种精度显示出它足以满足日常导航任务的需要。在一次大约10公里的自行车旅行中,Galaxy S23+在与Garmin Venu2健身追踪器的对抗中保持了自己的优势,尽管它偶尔会稍微偏离实际的骑行路线。然而,这种情况在Garmin Venu2上也时有发生。

GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:环湖航行
GPS测试:环湖航行
GPS测试:转折点
GPS测试:转折点

电话功能和通话质量

和它的前辈一样,Galaxy S23+在通话质量方面得分很高。声音的再现非常自然,在较高的环境中也很容易理解。启动扬声器后,轻微的混响悄然而至。这在较远的距离上变得更加放大,但仍能清楚地理解呼叫者的意思。

除了VoLTE,Galaxy S23+还支持WiFi通话,并可接受两张5G功能的SIM卡。可以选择激活eSIM,而不是物理SIM卡。

照相机--具有5千万像素的三相机系统

自拍相机拍摄
自拍相机拍摄

Galaxy S23+与Galaxy S23共享同样的三摄像头设置,也是Galaxy S22系列中的设置。它包括一个具有光学图像稳定功能(OIS)的5千万像素广角摄像头,一个12百万像素的超广角摄像头,以及一个具有OIS和3倍光学变焦功能的10百万像素长焦摄像头。

1000万像素的前置摄像头位于显示屏边缘顶部的一个冲孔中,可以进行良好的自拍。此外,它还能以每秒60帧的速度录制高达4K的视频,并具有视频稳定功能和HDR10+。用户还可以从Galaxy S23+的5000万像素前置摄像头中受益,它可以录制最高8K和每秒30帧的视频。在4K时,最大可达到60fps。在专业视频模式下,全高清的120帧/秒以及其他分辨率的其他帧率也可以使用。

在像素分选的帮助下,在拍摄照片时,5000万像素的主摄像头将4个相邻的像素合并成一个,从而产生12.5万像素的图像。使用照片标准模式,相机软件自动选择最佳场景设置,这在我们的测试中产生了良好的效果。

主摄像机拍摄
主摄像机拍摄
主摄像机拍摄
主摄像机拍摄
超广角相机拍摄
超广角相机拍摄
主摄像机拍摄
主摄像机拍摄
主摄像机拍摄
主摄像机拍摄
主摄像机拍摄
主摄像机拍摄

总的来说,清晰度和对比度都很好,颜色显得很自然。对于三星来说,典型的情况是,它们可能会表现得有些过于饱和和鲜艳。特别是,这是影响红色和橙色色调的东西。对于希望调整所有照片设置,如光圈、曝光和白平衡的人来说,切换到专业模式会有帮助。使用这种模式,图像可以保存为RAW格式,而不是标准的JPG图像格式。

夜间拍摄可能经常对许多智能手机构成难以克服的挑战,但对于Galaxy S23+的主摄像头来说,它们没有任何问题。在夜景 模式下,它能拍出细致的照片(即使在低光下),并能相对真实地再现色彩。

凭借其3倍光学变焦(数字可达30倍),长焦相机(数字可达30倍)在选择拍摄对象时提供了更多的自由,并且由于其最佳的图像稳定功能,可以拍摄出质量好、无颤抖的图像。1200万像素的超广角相机是这三个镜头中最弱的一个。虽然这里的色彩和对比度也很好,但图像的边缘既模糊又有噪音。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2Ultraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme

在受控的照明条件下,主摄像头也能提供良好的结果。由于Delta E为17,ColorChecker测试图的颜色被相当准确地再现。即使在1勒克斯的低光下,色彩准确性仍然比较高。在这些困难的照明条件下,相机能很好地捕捉和再现测试图表,即使有点模糊。

ColorChecker
10.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
17 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S23+: 9.31 ∆E min: 2.42 - max: 17 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.9 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S23+: 16.89 ∆E min: 7.9 - max: 27.31 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - a spartan package

据三星称,Galaxy S23+的黑色包装由100%的再生纸组成。这已经表明了配件的简陋程度,这一点后来在打开包装时得到了证实。内容仅限于一个SIM卡工具、一条USB-C电缆、一份快速入门指南以及一些小册子和保修提示。

任何寻求最大充电速度的人--Galaxy S23+支持高达45瓦--将不得不购买一个额外的充电器。然而,在其自己的网上商店,三星提供了一个45瓦的充电器它的价格高达50欧元。如果原厂配件不是必须的,第三方供应商提供的充电器价格要低得多。

三星为Galaxy S23+提供24个月的保修。这可以通过Care+保险来延长。该保险提供一年或两年的合同长度,还提供可选的防盗保护。这些服务从99美元到249美元不等。

输入设备和操作--快速而流畅

得益于其引擎盖下强大的硬件--一台 骁龙8代处理器Galaxy,8GB的DDR5X内存和最低256GB的UFS 3.0存储,Galaxy S23+运行非常流畅,无论在什么情况下。

在测试中,这款智能手机运行起来,好像没有什么能真正让它承受压力。自适应AMOLED显示屏对所有的输入做出了快速而准确的反应,这在很大程度上有助于形成这种整体印象。

Galaxy S23+在超声波指纹传感器和面部解锁的帮助下,也有生物识别认证。前者位于显示屏下方,可以快速、可靠地解锁三星设备。同样,该智能手机的二维人脸识别也因其高命中率而得分,但并不十分安全。

键盘人像
键盘人像
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示屏 - 亮度明显高于1000尼特的AMOLED面板

子像素
子像素

Galaxy S23+的AMOLED面板显示2,640 x 1,080像素(FHD+),这样一来,它的分辨率与6.1英寸的同胞型号Galaxy S23相同。在标准设置中,OLED屏幕动态地将其帧率从48到120赫兹进行调整,这取决于应用程序。另外,它也可以被限制在60赫兹,以节省电力。在游戏模式下,AMOLED显示屏以高达240 Hz的触摸采样率运行。还支持HDR10、HDR10+和HLG。

现在,四位数尼特区域的亮度是可以预期的。三星Galaxy S23+轻松跨越了这个障碍,在显示纯白色背景时,平均亮度为1136cd/m²。这甚至比Galaxy S22+的亮度还要高一丝。在直接比较中,只有 小米13 Pro能超过Galaxy S23+,其平均亮度为1244 cd/m²。

当我们重复测量亮度时,Galaxy S23+接近制造商规定的1750 cd/m²的规格,这一次有了确定数量的黑暗区域。随后,在APL18测试中,亮度明显增加,最高达到1630 cd/m²。在停用亮度传感器的情况下,最高可达429cd/m²,而在激活额外亮度 选项时,最高可达723cd/m²。在最低亮度设置下,我们测得1.18 cd/m²,当在辅助功能 菜单中选择额外调光时,可以降低到非常好的0.81 cd/m²。

在最低亮度下,Galaxy S23+的AMOLED面板以恒定的120Hz运行。乍一看,这似乎很低,但由于平坦的振幅曲线,它对眼睛很容易。在亮度大于3%的情况下,频率翻倍至240赫兹,并设法保持在一个恒定的水平。Galaxy 显示器的亮度控制与具有永久直流调光的AMOLED面板相对应。

1135
cd/m²
1129
cd/m²
1145
cd/m²
1134
cd/m²
1128
cd/m²
1141
cd/m²
1134
cd/m²
1133
cd/m²
1145
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1145 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1136 cd/m² Minimum: 1.18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1128 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.05
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1"
Google Pixel 7 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy S22+
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Vivo X90 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"
Xiaomi 13 Pro
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
18%
27%
5%
20%
24%
Brightness middle
1128
1046
-7%
1022
-9%
1090
-3%
1018
-10%
1230
9%
Brightness
1136
1049
-8%
1025
-10%
1097
-3%
1026
-10%
1244
10%
Brightness Distribution
99
98
-1%
99
0%
98
-1%
93
-6%
94
-5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.7
1.2
56%
0.9
67%
2.5
7%
0.9
67%
1
63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.5
3.1
31%
2.1
53%
3.8
16%
2.2
51%
2.8
38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
1.7
35%
1.1
58%
2.3
12%
1.9
27%
1.8
31%
Gamma
2.05 107%
2.19 100%
2.22 99%
2.04 108%
2.26 97%
2.24 98%
CCT
6644 98%
6538 99%
6650 98%
6492 100%
6473 100%
6446 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25%的显示亮度
25 %
50 %的显示亮度
50 %
75%的显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示。

在色彩再现方面,Galaxy S23+提供了良好的结果,但在色彩准确度方面,由于最大Delta E为4.5,它远远低于其他产品。该显示器在使用sRGB色彩空间的自然 图片模式下产生了最佳效果。任何喜欢更醒目但不完全准确的颜色的人,最好使用预装的生动图片模式,因为这也涵盖了明显更广泛的DCI P3色彩空间。

色彩检查器(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
色彩检查器(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
色彩空间(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间sRGB)
色彩空间(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间sRGB)
灰度(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
灰度(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
色彩饱和度(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间sRGB)
色彩饱和度(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7305 ms rise
↘ 0.635 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.98 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.493 ms rise
↘ 0.4875 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

S23+的AMOLED显示屏具有明亮和稳定的可视角度,在户外总是清晰可辨。即使在阳光直射下,情况也是如此。

户外使用(自动亮度)
户外使用(自动亮度)
户外使用(最大亮度)
户外使用(最大亮度)
三星Galaxy S23+

性能 -- 骁龙而非Exynos

与Galaxy S23系列的所有手机一样,Galaxy S23+搭载了一个 骁龙8代处理器,用于Galaxy.与普通 骁龙8代2Galaxy ,该变体运行的主频较高,达到160兆赫,最高频率为3.36 GHz,而不是正常的3.2 GHz。

正如预期的那样,在单核性能方面,Galaxy 的骁龙8代2接近领先水平,但不是高端SoC中最快的。在这方面,Galaxy S23+与之保持着明显的、令人尊敬的距离Apple iPhone 14 Pro与其 A16 Bionic。Galaxy 的骁龙8代2在AImark人工智能计算方面很挣扎,但许多其他SoC,如 谷歌Pixel 7 Pro的谷歌Tensor 2并没有做得更好。然而,在一天结束时,这些只是数字,因为性能始终是流动的,在日常使用时,该设备有丰富的性能。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1878 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1563 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1542 - 1598, n=7)
1561 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1499 Points -4%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1384 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1133 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1048 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5538 Points +13%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5201 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (4906 - 5198, n=7)
5020 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4906 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4232 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3599 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3222 Points -34%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1277795 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1210674 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1086936 - 1286774, n=8)
1181107 Points -2%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1175789 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
965593 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
850401 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points -34%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
773857 Points -36%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (15270 - 17267, n=8)
16185 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
15483 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14998 Points -3%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
14789 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points -16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11397 Points -26%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9765 Points -37%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1332 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1332 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1120 - 1332, n=8)
1239 Points -7%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1224 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1129 Points -15%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
932 Points -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
886 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points -34%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (8541 - 9337, n=8)
8859 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8730 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7376 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7186 Points -18%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
6755 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
6164 Points -29%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
13602 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1374 - 14401, n=8)
12462 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11373 Points -16%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10786 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points -25%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9767 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
9294 Points -32%
Memory
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9245 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
9212 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (8467 - 9212, n=8)
8823 Points -4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7232 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6844 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points -27%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5456 Points -41%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (21505 - 31928, n=8)
28672 Points +12%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
27698 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
25642 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
22986 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17475 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points -34%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16375 Points -36%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1960 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1808 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1460 - 2032, n=8)
1768 Points -2%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1739 Points -4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1665 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points -13%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
843 Points -53%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
44483 Points +170%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
42662 Points +159%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16464 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15778 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1267 - 16702, n=8)
14423 Points -12%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
37396 Points +2975%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
31865 Points +2520%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1216 - 156427, n=6)
27143 Points +2132%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points +2028%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1354 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1216 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1008 Points -17%

ǞǞǞAdreno 740骁龙8代2中的Galaxy ,负责图形计算。这个像素加速器帮助Galaxy S23+实现了美妙的GPU性能,但只有在充分冷却的情况下才能实现。换句话说。为了获得最高的测试分数,我们必须在每次测试后让手机冷却一段时间,这样才能在随后的基准测试中避免节流。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3792 Points +7%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3784 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3528 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3265 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1935 Points -45%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1807 Points -49%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3877 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3843 Points -1%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3783 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3383 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2202 Points -43%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1847 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14566 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13984 Points -4%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13492 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
12429 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7890 Points -46%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6721 Points -54%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6894 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5777 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4672 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3909 Points -32%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24098 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22483 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14680 Points -39%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10987 Points -54%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14878 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14136 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9105 Points -36%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8449 Points -40%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
497 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
480 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
462 fps -4%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
320 fps -33%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps -48%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +19%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
292 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
278 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
265 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
214 fps -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps -5%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -9%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -53%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
222 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
215 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
197 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps -40%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps -47%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -53%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps -34%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -43%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -45%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -66%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
126 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
114 fps -10%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps -43%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -46%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -49%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -72%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -3%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -19%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
44 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -51%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -12%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -44%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -68%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
164 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
133 fps -19%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -63%

在浏览器基准测试中,Galaxy S23+提供了非常扎实的性能,帮助它属于,连同小米13 Pro属于这一领域中最快的Android 智能手机。然而,当涉及到网络冲浪测试时,无法绕过Apple ,因为iPhone 14 Pro已经令人印象深刻。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
281.762 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
176.612 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (152.9 - 196.3, n=8)
173.4 Points -2%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
137.873 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
107.364 Points -39%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
98.153 Points -44%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
67.646 Points -62%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
375 runs/min +150%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (136 - 197, n=6)
168.7 runs/min +12%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
150 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min -9%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
110.9 runs/min -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
105 runs/min -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
104 runs/min -31%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
60.2 runs/min -60%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
202 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (145 - 187, n=8)
165.5 Points +10%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
157 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
151 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points -25%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
90 Points -40%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
66 Points -56%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
74261 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
60423 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (49582 - 64715, n=8)
59058 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
44398 Points -27%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
44245 Points -27%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
42544 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points -38%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
21648 Points -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
1847.5 ms * -164%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -124%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
1557.9 ms * -123%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
1011.5 ms * -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (634 - 1533, n=8)
795 ms * -14%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
699 ms *
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
690.6 ms * +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
475.3 ms * +32%

* ... smaller is better

快速的UFS 4.0存储确保了Galaxy S23+的加载时间特别短。然而,在写入性能方面,该设备难以跟上智能手机的步伐,如vivo X90 Pro小米13 Pro- 一个同样拥有UFS 4.0存储的设备。在竞争的智能手机中,Galaxy S23+在4KB的随机写入方面表现突出。

Samsung Galaxy S23+Google Pixel 7 ProSamsung Galaxy S22+Vivo X90 ProXiaomi 13 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
2%
99%
101%
80%
14%
Sequential Read 256KB
3250.14
1346.78
-59%
1629.99
-50%
3866.75
19%
3587.83
10%
Sequential Write 256KB
1014.33
874.73
-14%
1001.67
-1%
2643.38
161%
2601.45
156%
2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26)
149%
Random Read 4KB
441.77
219.01
-50%
306.7
-31%
367.89
-17%
387.72
-12%
Random Write 4KB
156.82
253.18
61%
297.67
90%
521.43
233%
546.98
249%

游戏--并不总是像预期的那样顺利

在游戏方面,Galaxy S23+拥有丰富的动力,Armajet充分展示了AMOLED显示屏最大可能的120Hz。然而,在其他游戏中,这并不总是能保证。例如,在PUBG移动游戏中,智能手机在高清/极限设置下只能达到每秒60帧,在高清/极限下只能达到40fps。这两款测试游戏的帧率都频繁下降。虽然在游戏中并不明显,但它们确实显示出驱动程序仍有优化的空间。

我们使用我们的测试工具,Gamebench来确定游戏帧率。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23+; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø116.5 (104-120)
Samsung Galaxy S23+; PUBG Mobile; 2.4.0: Ø59.6 (55-60)

排放--在运行中冷却,但有明显的节流作用

温度

在运行时,Galaxy S23+保持低温。即使经过一个小时的压力测试,我们也只能从设备上哄骗到32.7℃的最高表面温度。然而,为了实现这一目标,内部性能必须被严重扼杀。

3DMark压力测试显示了这种情况的迅速发生。在某些情况下,在前20次基准运行后,性能已经下降。最后,只剩下不到60%的原始帧率。然而,在日常使用中,这种性能损失应该是不明显的,因为即使在最坏的情况下,仍然有足够的动力。

Max. Load
 32.2 °C30.4 °C30.5 °C 
 32.7 °C32.2 °C30.2 °C 
 32.2 °C30.9 °C29.5 °C 
Maximum: 32.7 °C
Average: 31.2 °C
29.4 °C29.9 °C30.7 °C
29 °C29.7 °C30.8 °C
29.1 °C30.5 °C30.5 °C
Maximum: 30.8 °C
Average: 30 °C
Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.1 % +55%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
82 % +53%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.1 % +38%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.9 % +27%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.2 % +9%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.6 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.2 % +53%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.7 % +41%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.6 % +31%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
68 % +18%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.9 % +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.8 %
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.3 (13.4-23.1)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø15 (13.7-20.2)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø9.11 (8.06-13.3)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø21.1 (19.4-22)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.7 (43-80.2)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø53.3 (48.7-59.4)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.4 (27.4-47.1)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73.8 (64.6-77.7)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø57.9 (54.7-74.4)
三星Galaxy S23+
三星Galaxy S23+

发言人

Galaxy S23+的杜比-阿莫斯认证的立体声扬声器能产生良好的声音,即使在最大音量下也不会失真。低音在声音组合中有些丢失,但仍然比许多智能手机的声音要好得多。

有线耳机或扬声器可以通过USB-C电缆(不包括)连接到智能手机上。无线方面,通过蓝牙5.3完成。然而,由于有AAC、SBC、aptX、LDAC和三星的无缝编解码器(SSC),蓝牙编解码器的选择不是特别广泛。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.836.82527.940.23124.336.54028.236.25036.742.26322.239.38025.440.21002140.712518.647.916015.455.520015.157.125013.161.43151261.840012.763.350011.868.563012.967.780010.472.6100013.376.8125013.278.7160012.181.4200012.281.9250012.981.4315014.880.3400015.881.4500016.180.2630014.481.8800013.680.61000013.575.81250014.471.1160001567.6SPL25.991.8N0.790.6median 13.5median 75.8Delta1.39.437.434.32836.532.636.327.731.23441.32736.523.635.922.338.317.739.516.151.612.850.913.156.312609631167.910.770.910.374.310.977.112.17911.879.61281.511.881.711.983.312.980.813.378.613.472.713.578.613.671.414.868.914.16424.691.30.686.3median 12.8median 72.71.29.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S23+Samsung Galaxy S22+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--几乎无限的持久力

消耗功率

Galaxy S23+的SoC切换到骁龙8代2的好处不仅体现在更高的性能方面。从正面看,与 Galaxy S22+和它的三星Exynos 2200相比,该设备的耗电量明显减少。

超越三星的世界,Galaxy S23+对其电池容量的预算变得更加明显,它的运行比所有其他竞争设备更经济。竞争者 Apple iPhone 14 Pro最接近我们的评测竞争者。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.12 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.64 / 0.88 / 0.94 Watt
Load midlight 4.18 / 6.59 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S23+
4700 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3200 mAh
Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22+
4500 mAh
Vivo X90 Pro
4870 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-12%
-30%
-39%
-69%
-36%
-103%
-56%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
0.56
12%
0.78
-22%
0.71
-11%
0.9
-41%
1.02
-59%
1.531 ?(0.44 - 3.4, n=8)
-139%
Idle Average *
0.88
1.37
-56%
1.61
-83%
1.1
-25%
2.32
-164%
1.36
-55%
1.848 ?(0.69 - 3.68, n=8)
-110%
Idle Maximum *
0.94
1.42
-51%
1.63
-73%
1.19
-27%
2.39
-154%
1.58
-68%
1.998 ?(0.83 - 3.91, n=8)
-113%
Load Average *
4.18
3.42
18%
3.29
21%
7.74
-85%
3.64
13%
4.29
-3%
Load Maximum *
6.59
5.56
16%
6.01
9%
9.64
-46%
6.53
1%
6.15
7%
10.7 ?(6.16 - 15.9, n=8)
-62%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.63 (0.82-14.8)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.01 (1.002-15.6)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.746 (0.695-0.926)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.814 (0.76-1.222)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.4 (11.2-13.4)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.3 (6.26-14.5)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.746 (0.695-0.926)
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.814 (0.76-1.222)

电池寿命

在电池寿命方面,Galaxy S23+是令人信服的,而且持续的时间要比Galaxy S22+.这款智能手机以近20小时的模拟互联网冲浪和超过25小时的视频播放,让竞争对手望尘莫及--两者都是在使用自适应显示亮度的150cd/m²下。总而言之,只有Apple iPhone 14 Pro能达到类似的良好电池寿命,其次是Galaxy S22+,位居第三。

Galaxy S23+的4700毫安时电池可在最大45瓦特的条件下充电。然而,寻找合适的充电器的工作是留给用户的,因为盒子里没有附带充电器。通过无线方式,Galaxy S23+可以以高达15瓦的功率进行补充。由于有了无线PowerShare,该智能手机可以用来为其他设备无线充电(Qi无线充电标准)。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
43h 05min
WiFi Websurfing
19h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
25h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 25min
Samsung Galaxy S23+
4700 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3200 mAh
Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22+
4500 mAh
Vivo X90 Pro
4870 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh
Battery Runtime
-12%
-39%
-18%
-24%
-31%
Reader / Idle
2585
2659
3%
1210
-53%
2575
0%
1509
-42%
H.264
1524
1397
-8%
1213
-20%
1021
-33%
1263
-17%
WiFi v1.3
1196
807
-33%
676
-43%
788
-34%
909
-24%
846
-29%
Load
385
351
-9%
226
-41%
364
-5%
254
-34%

Pros

+ 优质的制造质量
+ IP68 认证
+ 漫长的更新期
+ 良好的摄像头
+ 明亮的120赫兹amoled显示屏
+ 系统性能高
+ 非常长的电池寿命

Cons

- 负载下的节流
- 不含充电器
- 充电时最大功率为 45 瓦特
- 没有WiFi 7

结论 - 三星Galaxy S23+

审查。三星Galaxy S23+。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。
审查。三星Galaxy S23+。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。

与S23系列的兄弟姐妹机型一样,三星Galaxy S23+是目前最好的Android 智能手机之一。与它的前辈相比,变化相对较小。然而,三星对其智能手机进行优化的几个领域增加了真正的价值。

通过从Exynos SoC切换到Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 forGalaxyGalaxy S23+不仅受益于性能的提高,而且该设备还以明显更经济的方式处理其4700毫安时电池所提供的电力。因此,与 Galaxy S22+电池寿命明显改善,使Galaxy S23+成为真正的长跑运动员。

三星Galaxy S23+是目前最好的Android 智能手机之一,其电池寿命比前代产品要好得多。

仍然存在的是Galaxy S22+也很有名的品质:自适应120赫兹显示屏、良好的三摄系统、带有双卡和eSIM的5G、超宽带芯片(UWB)、WiFi 6E和长期更新的承诺。

顺便说一句,Galaxy S23+的起价并不比Galaxy S22+高多少。那时,三星对8/256GB存储模型收取1049美元,或者说,比Galaxy S23+少50美元左右。除了现在可以以低于700美元的价格买到的Galaxy S22+之外,还有谷歌Pixel 7 Pro提供了一个更便宜但同样强大的替代品。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

如果直接从三星购买Galaxy S23+,8/256GB型号目前的价格为999美元,8/512GB版本的价格为1119美元。在审查时,这两种内存变体在各种网上商店都可以买到,价格略低。

Samsung Galaxy S23+ - 03/07/2023 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
69 / 70 → 98%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
92%
Games Performance
68 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
94 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 85%
Camera
79%
Average
85%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S23+智能手机评论 - 更好的Galaxy S23
Manuel Masiero, 2023-03-13 (Update: 2024-08-15)